Sigma 18-35 vs Tokina 28-70 (angie) - Ursa Mini 4.6k

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 44

  • @scotey
    @scotey 6 місяців тому +1

    Such an oddly emotional video. The images and music combined are transcendant.

  • @oliverticalstudios
    @oliverticalstudios 2 роки тому +2

    AMAZING VIDEO!!! Just got my hands on the Tokina 28-70 and it’s a gem!!! Love your work. 🏁

    • @davidevans000
      @davidevans000  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks! It really is an amazing lens full of character.

  • @xedslo
    @xedslo 4 роки тому +5

    I love this Tokina lens, and I'm considering buying it. I prefere it over the sigma, much more character and contrast compared to sigma. Great video, I'm glad I found it. Nice shooting!

  • @dylanyanes
    @dylanyanes 2 роки тому +1

    bruh you were ahead of the game

  • @johnnguyen-xt9nd
    @johnnguyen-xt9nd Рік тому

    Stunning

  • @briantorsell
    @briantorsell 2 роки тому +1

    That flare at 2:50 is perfect!

  • @dimitrischronisanimusmenti6973
    @dimitrischronisanimusmenti6973 6 років тому +3

    My eyes may trick me but i prefer the tokina! Nice video, only thing i didnt like was the halo around objects against the sky. Did you mask the sky to make it bluer?

  • @camerynrichards5211
    @camerynrichards5211 2 роки тому +2

    Holy shit, incredible...Pro I or Pro II (please say Pro II haha)

  • @Theo_wu
    @Theo_wu 2 роки тому

    Hi i wanna ask how do u achieve the square flare in 2:51 looks amazing

    • @ayu_anime
      @ayu_anime Рік тому

      The square flare happens do the aperture circle inside the lens (if you have lens at home and change the aperture you will notice that the stuff that rotates inside the lens to allow more or less light are perfectly circle at all times hence you get those round flares) however some lens are designed in a way that's not perfectly circle and it makes these square looking flares, cheers!

  • @antoniolazarski9361
    @antoniolazarski9361 2 роки тому

    Don't look like the 2.6-2.8, are you using a focal reducer? Keep it up, great filmmaking!!!

  • @peakyan
    @peakyan 3 роки тому

    nice work!!!

  • @RandomRyman
    @RandomRyman 7 років тому +1

    Hey nice video. Can you use the rocker zoom that comes with the camera with these lenses? And how does the focus hold up when you do zoom?

  • @datamedicpr
    @datamedicpr 3 роки тому +3

    Tokina looks more in the Cinema ground

  • @tylou4479
    @tylou4479 4 роки тому +2

    I have 18-35mm and just the other day I got the Tokina too... What F stops were you using most on the Tokina?

    • @davidevans000
      @davidevans000  4 роки тому +1

      Hi. I find that 5.6 is the sweet spot of the Tokina

  • @tomonoriwatanabe2188
    @tomonoriwatanabe2188 8 років тому +3

    What Luts did you use?

    • @davidevans000
      @davidevans000  8 років тому +1

      Tomonori Watanabe I used a kodak LUT, but can't remember which one. One of those that comes with Resolve, under film looks.

    • @tomonoriwatanabe2188
      @tomonoriwatanabe2188 8 років тому

      Thanks! Nice video btw!

  • @NathanFollmer
    @NathanFollmer 7 років тому +1

    Dumb question here, but the art lenses say they are designed for APS-C sensors. Do you use any kind of adapter with them on the 4.6k or do they cover the sensor fine with the EF mount?

    • @davidevans000
      @davidevans000  7 років тому +1

      Nathan Follmer hi. There is vignette at 18mm when using the full 4.6k. I don't see many people complaining about it, but I definitly get CA and vignette at 18mm

    • @NathanFollmer
      @NathanFollmer 7 років тому

      davidevans000 would you say it's unusable? Just trying to put together a decent lens pack for this camera. Your video looks amazing, so I'm hoping the Sigma will work. I'll probably only shoot at 1080p and 4k anyway.

    • @davidevans000
      @davidevans000  7 років тому

      Nathan Follmer it's perfectly usable. A lot of people use the combo ursa mini 4.6k and sigma 18-35. But it's something to consider. Don't forget that even if you shoot at 1080p, you are using the full sensor, unless you window the sensor like when using raw

    • @NathanFollmer
      @NathanFollmer 7 років тому

      davidevans000 thanks for your help! I'll add the Sigma to my list.

    • @LarrySmith-zj2zl
      @LarrySmith-zj2zl 7 років тому +1

      Nathan Follmer apsc cover super 35mm sensors fine no crop from the lens like full frame with crop lenses.

  • @DUST35
    @DUST35 6 років тому

    Are there different versions of the Tokina 28-70, regarding the Angenieux optical formula? It looks nice 👌

    • @sittingnow
      @sittingnow 4 роки тому +3

      yeah, you want to get the 1st or 2nd gen lens, they changed the formulae after that

  • @danielgreenberg4751
    @danielgreenberg4751 4 роки тому +1

    Is this the constant aperture 2.8 Tokina?

    • @davidevans000
      @davidevans000  4 роки тому +2

      Hi, this lens is 2.6 on the wide end and 2.8 on 75mm. It's the angenieux design.

    • @therealsondu5371
      @therealsondu5371 3 роки тому

      @@davidevans000 It's actually only 2.6 up to about 35mm, from there it's 2.8 up to 70mm. This is why the Japanese version doesn't even state 2.6-2.8 on the lens barrel...they mark it as a straight 2.8 since the 2.6 range is so small. Regardless, incredible lens...mine is on the "Untouchables" list.

    • @stephenericwalsh
      @stephenericwalsh 2 роки тому

      Hey there. Was this stabilised in any way? The footage looked shaky but in that good way that handled film used to be. Doesn’t have the floatiness of stabilisation but doesn’t seem to have that horrible jitter of regular handheld video.

    • @zaymax_7
      @zaymax_7 2 роки тому

      @@stephenericwalsh it’s because the whole setup is heavy enough to not have microjitters. The lens itself weighs 700g+, plus the ursa which is chunky

  • @dark-california
    @dark-california 2 роки тому

    Definitely prefer the Tokina
    Actually I'm just gonna grab one
    Pro I or II, as long as it's mint
    Funny since we're 5 years later as when you posted it ...

  • @folkmotion479
    @folkmotion479 7 років тому +1

    Nicely shot. I reckon you had to add crop bars yea?

    • @davidevans000
      @davidevans000  7 років тому +2

      Nochie Divine hi. yes, on Resolve I chose 2.39 output blanking. I also shoot with 2.39 frame guidelines

  • @DFranco91
    @DFranco91 7 років тому

    Nice!
    What would you say is the best aperture range for the Sigma?

    • @davidevans000
      @davidevans000  7 років тому +1

      Hi. The Sigma is incredibly sharp at whatever aperture you use. Traditionally, I don't go past f5.6 on most of my lenses.

  • @bijosn
    @bijosn 4 роки тому +1

    is it the tokina 2.8 from the 90s?

  • @chardonwaite
    @chardonwaite 8 років тому

    I also have the Sigma and love it on this camera but I'm impressed by the Tokina it looks great 👍

    • @davidevans000
      @davidevans000  8 років тому +3

      Chardon Waite This particular version of the tokina was made with the original angenieux optical formula. I love it a lot.

    • @chardonwaite
      @chardonwaite 8 років тому

      davidevans000 you have made me want one of those lenses now

    • @oninofernandez
      @oninofernandez 3 роки тому

      @@davidevans000 which is the first version, right?