Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Why the URSA 4.6k G2 is legendary
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 сер 2024
- Why is the Blackmagic URSA Mini Pro 4.6k G2 one of the most popular and relied upon cameras in the industry? Is the image quality really that good? Why do hundreds of productions decide to use the URSA 4.6k G2 on a daily basis? Would I recommend picking one up when there are other URSAs to consider? I'll try to answer these questions and more in this review. Thanks for stopping by, I hope you enjoy.
Pick up a URSA 4.6k G2 - amzn.to/46lRbHn
Most Used Lens - amzn.to/3D1NFER
Cinema Lens used for this video - amzn.to/42ZVC7D
Shotgun Mic - amzn.to/433RzXO
Handheld Mic/Recorder - amzn.to/3He9d3F
Fuzzy Windshield for Mic - amzn.to/3J0TOVK
Headphones - amzn.to/3D1m2ff
Tripod Head - amzn.to/3kr1LJt
Tripod Legs - amzn.to/3ZQm03F
*Links are affiliated. No extra cost to you, but a few extra burritos for me (How could you possibly pass up that?)*
Music by Endel - endel.io/
0:00 Intro
0:32 The Differences Between URSAs
1:22 Specs
1:35 Dynamic Range
1:47 NDs
1:57 IO
2:07 Card Slots
2:17 Recording
2:50 Image Quality
4:00 Why the URSA 4.6k
6:16 What Blackmagic Should Do Next
7:30 Conclusion
#ursa4.6kg2 #blackmagicdesign #davinciresolve #blackmagicursa #ursa4.6k #ursa12k #ursabroadcastg2 #blackmagicursa4.6kg2review #blackmagicursa4.6kg2lowlight #blackmagicdesignursa4.6kg2footage #colorgrading #davinciresolvecolorgrading #ursareview #cinemacamerareview #cinemacamera
I have been using this camera all over the world since the week this camera came out. Hands down One of the greatest cameras ever made. I've taken this into corporate shoots, weddings, hanging off cliff faces, and even summiting 16k Ft+ mountains. Not once has this camera ever held me back. Only now can I come close to saying Ive reached the skill cap of this camera. And even then I still could use this camera another 5 years and lose out on nothing.
This cam just went on sale for 3k. I was looking at the Pyxis, but this may make more sense. Did your ursa ce with a PL interchangeable mount or did you have to purchase separate?
Thanks for sharing.
To add to this topic - (1) the Ursa G2 records in Gen4 not Gen5 and (2) buying the Ursa 12K Pro means buying BMD’s best and largest sensor and color science. It’s not about resolution, but about image quality.
Looking to pick up a G2 soon. I agree with your points but the thing that puts me off the 12K is its severe lack of low-light performance. I know the G2 is not exactly great in that field either, but it seems much more usable than the 12K. Do you have any experience shooting with either? Great video Jake btw!
@@ElliotMillson No, I don't have experience with the URSA cameras. What if you used a Pocket camera with dual native ISO for your low-light work?
@@DANAMIONLINE It's a good shout. I have the Pocket 4K already with a Speedbooster and it's pretty decent at the higher ISOs. Just feels like the 12K gets super noisy anywhere above 800 and I'd like to be able to push to at least 1600 on an A cam without having to switch to the pocket. Think I may have to rent an ursa to see for myself!
@@ElliotMillson
Its true, the low light out of the G2 is not great. I use the 4k for all the lowlight stuff I come across. Still far and wide, the URSA is the perfect move up from the pocket range (I'm considering an fx30 as a lowlight dedicated cam)
I tend to not really venture that far out of ISO 1600 on the ursa, but you'd probably be able to work some magic if you were to jump up to 3200. That being said, I'm only really using it in light controlled environments or daylight. Personally, I've found the noise levels at 1600 to be perfectly acceptable and manageable.
I've shot with both the 4k and URSA together and on their own extensively if you've got any questions.
@@iwsfilm_ Thanks for your reply! Really appreciate it. That's good to know the G2 is usable at 1600. The vast majority of stuff I shoot is under controlled lighting (or at least daylight), but there's always those golden hour / dusk moments when you need that extra push. I plan on keeping the 4K for any night stuff but that's an interesting point with the fx30- haven't really looked into that camera much.
The only other thing that bugs me slightly about the G2 is the fact they haven't updated it to gen 5 colours internally yet. Obvs this isn't so much of an issue with Braw but there are times when I'm needing to hand off ProRes directly to a client and I'd much rather be in gen 5. Don't suppose you've heard any news of a future firmware update for this?
Today, they are selling brand new for $3000 USD!!
One thing people forget to mention about its prores option is that its still under the gen 4 colors and not being able to switch over to gen 5 colors in post so i dont even recommended the proress
Yeah that is totally true, the only way to get Gen 5 color is to shoot raw and switch it in post. Thanks for pointing that out
@@jakehayden998 yea no problem, everyone who talks about this camera forgets to mention that. Thats why I don't use prores off the g2.
you were 95% right - pyxis
Ursa g2 is one of the best cameras to buy and invest in. Got my g2 for 2500 and a 18-35 t2 for 1k. Camera outperforms any mirrorless consumer bodies
that's a great purchase price!
@@evanthecameraman it is, cannot recommend the ursa g2 enough
Where'd you catch that deal? I'm looking for one to pair with my 6k pro
@@prostigeMarketing fb market but I had to search around
@@prostigeMarketing negotiate like hell lol
Love it Bro, Keep killing it!
great video jake! im rocking an FX3, and I by no means need a camera like this, but it definitely makes me want one😂 very cool dude
its cheaper than an fx3 lol
Love the way you made this overview of the Ursa. A well-made video with some real craft and love. I've loved filming on these.
Good job. 🎥🎬💙
Awesome review. What is the Ursa case you are using? Thanks
The only critique I've ever seen someone have is that they'd like a smaller size. In terms of performance, it can't be beat.
The GOAT!
Really helpful, thank you.
Really love the footage of the Ursa Mini but a A7S3 gives me a stabilizer and unmatched low light performances which for a run and gun guy like me is a no brainer. A Red Komodo or and Ursa delivers better images out of the box but I can tweak the footage in post prod to have the same results with a Sony. I'm still hesitating sometimes because Blackmagic is such a great company, with an awesome editing workflow and an eye on affordable systems for everyone which is very commandable. But I can't take the plunge until they improve on stabilizer and low lights characteristics.
The A7S3 is insanely good, I say you stick with what you are comfortable with. You can certainly get cinema quality out of an A7S3
Do you prefer the image quality of ursa g2 or the pocket 6k g2/pro?
They're pretty similar at a glance but I would say I definitely the prefer the URSA g2. It's got more dynamic range and less rolling shutter
Very informative review.
awesome review ! I have the 6k pro and now the new 6k FF but i'm considering selling the 6k pro in order to get a G2, especially for the rolling shutter performance and better frame rates than the 6k ff
One thing that also attracts me and would like your opinion is about the codecs, i'm really interested on the G2 for the prores 4444 as wel as XQ for color work, is it better than braw ? even if it's slightly better, this would be helpful for me, considering i'm mostly doing commercial work as freelancer DoP, so having access to better files for post production would be really nice for projects that have the right budget. I know prores will use a lot more media, but it's the quality better on this 12bit codec ?
As far as I know the BRAW codecs (with minimal compression) are almost identical to the higher end Prores codecs (like Prores 4444). I'm not sure if there would be a meaningful difference but I could totally be wrong. I would love to be able to make a video about this at some point though. I'm really curious what kind of image quality differences there might be
@@jakehayden998 Since braw is not a true raw (even though it's a 12bit codec), i thought that by going with a prores 4444 XQ, it would be the best possible way to capture all the information the sensor would give and would be as close to a 'real raw' codec, similar to when you shoot with an Alexa and don't want to use ArriRaw, you go for 4444/XQ.
I know the differences might not be visible in a simple test, but i would love to see some challenging situations, to see if there would be any advantages to use it over braw.
I love braw, don't get me wrong, its an amazing codec, especially with high compression (like 12:1), it holds up a lot and you can record a lot on an ssd, but for some commercials that i've been DoP, i would love to see if the prores 4444 XQ would make a difference.
Great video! Not sure if this is a UA-cam thing, but the footage looks a little noisy.
Yeah, seems we have another gadget guy shooting reviews instead of actual filmmakers who know how to light and shoot a scene. The grain is his thing I guess, trying to make it look like film. I was wondering if he was lighting using a shoplight from Home Depot but nope, just doesn't know what he's doing at all.
The video signal itself coming off of the URSA 4.6k G2 is really clean as long as you are exposed correctly and below 800ish ISO. Chances are the grain you are seeing is the film grain I usually add to introduce a little bit of texture to my videos. Good eye and thanks for asking
@@jakehayden998 main reason why I am going with the Broadcast G2 with that dual ISO for event shooting or when shooting in general and I have little to no control of the lighting. Also, 6K will help a lot when shooting vfx plates
Also the 4.6k G2 has 15+ Stops not 12
It does indeed say on the box that the URSA 4.6k G2 has 15+ stops, but in the review I am talking about dynamic range at a signal to noise ratio of 2 (dynamic range above a certain threshold of noise). The total patch range captured by the sensor is usually around 15 total stops, but I chose to specify levels of dynamic range at signal to noise ratios of 1 and 2 in order to give some idea of dynamic range in relation to the noise floor. Either way the dynamic range is absolutely huge and really impressive
Worth noting: Black Magic has a patent on RAW compression. No other brand can offer compressed RAW, only full uncompressed RAW - talking about storage space. Anoher reason to consider Black Magic cams.
It's Red/now Nikon who has this patent not BMD; and Braw is not true 'raw', hence why it was invented, since BMD had to stop using compressed cDNG, because of the patent.
You have 4.7K views rn..
13-stops of dynamic range is NOT “massive”.
USUABLE 13 stops ARE massive. Blackmagic is real not a number pusher like others
15 stops if I recall correctly. Nothing to sneeze at
@@tyronetolentino
Huh?
Wha?
Jake shows us IN THE VIDEO that this cam has approx 13-STOPS of dynamic range!
@@habcast3978 Oops, my bad! Good day, sir 🫡
plz stop shooting on vespids - your shots look bad with this chromatic abberrations