The Legend Of King Arthur | King Arthur's Britain (Part 1 of 3) | Real Royalty

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • Finding new and previously unexplained evidence, Francis Pryor overturns the idea that Britain reverted to a state of anarchy and disorder after the Romans left in 410 AD. Instead of doom and gloom Francis discovers a continuous culture that assimilated influences from as far a field as the Middle East and Constantinople. Through scrutinising the myth of King Arthur to find out what was really going on when the Romans left, Francis is confronted by evidence that confounds traditional views of the 'Dark Ages'. There was also no invasion of bloodthirsty Anglo Saxons, rampaging across the countryside. With new archaeological evidence Francis discovers a far more interesting story.
    From Elizabeth II to Cleopatra, Real Royalty peels back the curtain to give a glimpse into the lives of some of the most influential families in the world, with new full length documentaries posted every week covering the monarchies of today and all throughout history.
    Subscribe to Real Royalty: bit.ly/3tofGQL
    Content licensed from DRG to Little Dot Studios.
    Any queries, please contact us at: owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 373

  • @FromaTwistedMind
    @FromaTwistedMind 4 роки тому +81

    I live in Chichester which still has its Roman walls & is near to Fishbourne Roman palace, which is next door to equally historic Bosham, home to King Harold and reputedly his burial place in its church, built by his mother. Nearby Kingley Vale is an ancient yew tree forest once inhabited by druids which contains trees over 2 thousand years. There are hill forts aplenty atop the ancient South Downs way...... I'm VERY lucky to have been born here in this timeless landscape.

    • @FromaTwistedMind
      @FromaTwistedMind 3 роки тому +7

      @@karilynn7486 Hi there, I'd say for sure your town is named after mine. Our Chichester was founded by the Romans and called Noviomagus Reginorum, then the Saxons landed it became an important Saxon town in the late 5th Century under King Aelle. It was then named after his son Cissa and become
      Cissaceastre ( Cissa's fort/Ceastre), then the Norman's took over after 1066 and it became Cicestre - Chichester.
      Funnily enough, in the last 60 years Chichester has become a very popular place for the wealthy, the wealthy retired and generally for the rich..... it's easy to identify them by their accents, and by the way they call Chichester Chi- Chester without any sign of a Sussex accent.

    • @932ForeverLove
      @932ForeverLove 3 роки тому +4

      Lucky/blessed indeed!

    • @michael7324
      @michael7324 3 роки тому +4

      Wow. I envy you.

    • @johnsoucy5977
      @johnsoucy5977 3 роки тому

      1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111a111a11111111a111a1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111a111a11111111a111a11aaaa1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111a111a11111111a111a11aaaa1111aa11a1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

    • @caidenkhari5756
      @caidenkhari5756 3 роки тому +1

      You prolly dont care at all but does someone know a tool to get back into an Instagram account??
      I stupidly forgot my login password. I love any tricks you can offer me.

  • @notsure64
    @notsure64 4 роки тому +15

    Read Mary Stewart's "The Crystal Cave" and the "Hollow Hills," they are fictional but they contain a lot of these ideas even though written in the 1970s. Good show though!

    • @lauravonutassy1919
      @lauravonutassy1919 3 роки тому +1

      I read those books years ago. Absolutely fascinating !!

    • @vickismith4422
      @vickismith4422 3 роки тому +1

      1=

    • @theresamorale2397
      @theresamorale2397 2 роки тому +1

      Mary Stewart's books captured the imagination of a young me long ago. Then I read everything I could get my hands on about Arthur. I don't care of highly educated others don't believe. I always will...

  • @user-xv9pb1fs5w
    @user-xv9pb1fs5w 3 роки тому +68

    Anyone else binge watching this channel? I've learned more here than from any history class.

    • @robcrotts
      @robcrotts 3 роки тому +3

      Yes!

    • @mickltlbjhbih3909
      @mickltlbjhbih3909 3 роки тому +2

      Nope

    • @vincentzack
      @vincentzack 2 роки тому

      Arthur was know king at all. He was known as the the “Boar of Cornwall”. His
      infamous knights of the round table truly were bloodthirsty murderous thugs. Merlin on the other hand was truly a man of peace, for a time. Merlin was born on May 1st, 449 a.d. His first name, Merlin means the one with great knowledge. The Welsh version of Merlin is: Myrrdin, which means ‘the laughing one’. His last name was Emrys (Welsh), which means Ambrosia/Ambrosius, so he was also called Merlin/Myrddin Ambrosius Merlin’s mother was a daughter of the King Of the Demetier region. Merlin's father, King Morvyrn, was a visionary, and these visionary capabilities led to Merlin being referred to as a "scion of the devil," a magician, a sorcerer. The naïveté and simplicity of the Christian interpretation held that Merlin and his father's paranormal abilities meant that they were satanical, and that father and son were allied with the devil and thus fathered by him. Merlin was also a bard, a doctor, a teacher, a prophet, a historian and ultimately the Prince and King of the Druids of the Demetier tribe from South Wales. This whole area was the homeland of the Celts. The Plejaren Keridwena, who was a sister of Ptaah’s grandfather Ezekiel. Thus an Aunt of Sfaath, was sent on a mission to instruct Merlin in Henoch's teachings. Merlin, being a Celtic druid, was chosen in the hoped that with his help, Arthur, would transform Henoch's teachings of love, peace, harmony and the freedom and equality for all people into reality. The Holy Grail? A Grail was a sacred place with a spring, usually located on a mountain that the Celts considered a nature sanctuary, where also a druid’s grove was erected, surrounded by trees and other plants and was where the druids meditated in deep consciousness-related interconnection with water, the earth and plants as well as with the inexhaustibleness of life. These holy places were intended as places of meditation for the druids. They were numerous and indeed existed wherever druids lived and fulfilled their obligations. Over the years and centuries after this time Christian writers changed the word grail to mean the actual vessel, or cauldron into which Myrddin put Keridwena’s transcription of Henoch’s teaching. This is a fabrication woven into the stories and passed down through the ages as scripture which are nothing but falsehoods and fantasies. The grail was a place and had nothing to do with the apparent ’‹holy grail’ of Christianity which was only based on lies and deception; it never existed and therefore was not used by Joseph of Arimathea to collect the blood of Jmmanuel (Jesus) at his crucifixion as Christian lore attests, which on top of everything, represents a mishmash of different time periods, given that Myrddin existed about 350 years after the death of Jmmanuel. The true ‘holy grail’ only existed as a holy place.

    • @davidstevenson9517
      @davidstevenson9517 Рік тому

      You attended History classes? Lucky You! I was condemned to New Zealand's oldest high school (est.1880) where History as a subject was never taught, NEVER. So the only way I could study was courtesy of our public libraries (Humanity's greatest invention).

    • @emilychen3839
      @emilychen3839 Рік тому

      I was a history major for my undergrad and they went pretty in-depth in class lol

  • @fabricelegascoin2485
    @fabricelegascoin2485 4 роки тому +30

    I love it when science meets myths. Great video, insightful and entertaining!

  • @mr.k1611
    @mr.k1611 Рік тому +5

    Facts. In the future, people will call us myths and legends. Stories have been past down the generations. No one simply "makes up" a story without looking at our past for inspiration.

  • @kathrynjordan8782
    @kathrynjordan8782 4 роки тому +41

    A very interesting perspective. Thank you. I'm a fan of King Arthur.

    • @kwokchongyum1935
      @kwokchongyum1935 4 роки тому

      @@ashleyguillot8986 questions u!

    • @ashleyguillot8986
      @ashleyguillot8986 4 роки тому

      @@kwokchongyum1935 omg! I must have fallen asleep on my phone the other night. I would have never known I did that 🤦

    • @annlouiseorgan3775
      @annlouiseorgan3775 4 роки тому +1

      I have always loved the stories of King Arthur,perhaps because of the comic strip “Prince Valiant” that was beautifully produced and appeared in the Seattle Times on Sunday’s. I didn’t know he wasn’t a real person until I was told by my future husband when we were in college! I was appalled! But this interest in Arthur led to my wanting to find out about him, and then to British history.

    • @lazaruskarl2629
      @lazaruskarl2629 3 роки тому

      Me too..

    • @harrietharlow9929
      @harrietharlow9929 2 роки тому +1

      Me, too!

  • @firstwavepuresoul
    @firstwavepuresoul 2 роки тому +12

    "As an Archeologist I have always been skeptical about King Arthur"...Well that's not your job is it? King Arthur is an historical legend and means a lot to the British people not to be dismissed out of hand right at the beginning of your video. A good Archeologist goals are to document and explain the origins and development of human culture, understand culture history, chronicle cultural evolution, and study human behavior and ecology, for both prehistoric and historic societies. Also the sarcastic remarks might well have been left out.

    • @onearmdaddy
      @onearmdaddy 2 роки тому +2

      And as the video series progresses he gets even more arrogant, ironically ending with him creating his own mythology and presenting it as fact.

    • @socrabe
      @socrabe Рік тому +1

      @@onearmdaddy thanks! I will watch something else

  • @nicholassudov2299
    @nicholassudov2299 4 роки тому +8

    Like. Of course, Rome did withdraw its legions from Britain, but not Roman colonists. it was no a sudden switching off the lights. The inter-ethnic integration had been going for 4 centuries. Just like India did not go back into its previous stage of history after the end of the British Radj.

  • @Schwarzkald
    @Schwarzkald 3 роки тому +11

    Am not surprise that the Celts had a good relation ship with Rome before things went sour. Celtic race went from Turkey to Ireland therefore they had contact with the Latin races. Plus Latin and Celtic are sister languages very similar. They understood each other. Culture wise Latins were more advance.

    • @72Yonatan
      @72Yonatan 3 роки тому

      Schwarzkopf, Latin and Celtic languages are not similar at all. You need to do more research.

    • @jerrythetrucker1211
      @jerrythetrucker1211 2 роки тому

      The Celtics are Vikings that are own the throne right now. Count dracula

  • @skyqueen152
    @skyqueen152 4 роки тому +11

    Thank you for a wonderful video and perspective. From a fan in San Francisco.

  • @RE-bg9ds
    @RE-bg9ds 4 роки тому +28

    In the background the movie that's being filmed that version of King Arthur was hands down the best I was a little skeptical at first but I think they got everybody in the cast spot on and the story to me seems a little more realistic

    • @gregoryrandall4819
      @gregoryrandall4819 4 роки тому +3

      The latest King Arthur movie
      Was nothing but rediculous PC crap

    • @RE-bg9ds
      @RE-bg9ds 4 роки тому +1

      @@gregoryrandall4819 are you talking about the Guy Ritchie legend of the sword because that's actually really f****** good too

    • @prepperjonpnw6482
      @prepperjonpnw6482 4 роки тому +5

      I enjoyed Excalibur with Helen Mirren the best.

    • @lestc8579
      @lestc8579 4 роки тому +2

      @@prepperjonpnw6482 does she get her tits out 🤔

    • @vitoriamichell8045
      @vitoriamichell8045 3 роки тому +1

      you should read the warlord chronicles by bernard cornwell, hands down the best story written about arthur

  • @One.DeSanctis.
    @One.DeSanctis. 4 роки тому +18

    Posts whinging about adverts are far more tedious than figuring out how to avoid adverts.

    • @1234cheerful
      @1234cheerful 3 роки тому

      @Percy Harry Hotspur Quite a word salad you got going there! I think I threaded through and got your point....

    • @legacyShredder1
      @legacyShredder1 3 роки тому

      @@1234cheerful Verbose is the word you're seeking.

  • @robertjones-yo4ql
    @robertjones-yo4ql 3 роки тому +5

    Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett know the History very well, Wales and the Welsh know most about Arthur, mind you there were 2 Arthurs 2 centuries apart , one a decendant of the other, South Wales is were to look

    • @FireInTheSoul
      @FireInTheSoul 3 роки тому +1

      True. I find it astonishing when people say King Arthur is a mystery. I've just finished reading the black books. How can anyone say he was a myth 🤷‍♀️

  • @vestofholding
    @vestofholding 3 роки тому +4

    47:26: "It has long been imagined that the figure who led this resurgence was King Arthur."
    Hmm? OH! Right! I'm watching a video about King Arthur, lol. No shade to the video, it's all interesting stuff. Just definitely went on a wild history trip to get back to this.

  • @godrickosei8775
    @godrickosei8775 3 роки тому +3

    Scroll the video all the way to the end and press replay cheat way to not get no adverts thank me later

  • @sallysassa
    @sallysassa 2 роки тому +5

    This series is absolutely wonderful. I watched Part 3 first. I am thoroughly enjoying it, thank you for posting.

  • @beenaplumber8379
    @beenaplumber8379 4 роки тому +7

    "Now all of this would be fine, were it not complete rubbish!" Don't hold back! Say what's on your mind, my friend! (And yes, he's convinced me to his point, absolutely.) Question though - he says Britain hasn't been invaded since 1066, and many people say that, but what about Henry Tudor and his band of foreign mercenaries invading in 1485 to take England by conquest, which he did? I've heard that called an invasion too, and I think it has all the signs.

    • @almacmathain6195
      @almacmathain6195 4 роки тому +3

      Beena Plumber: And 1688 when the Dutch invaded England and the ruling class acted like quislings and crowned Dutch William. Only the Scots and Irish fought the Dutch invaders.

    • @beenaplumber8379
      @beenaplumber8379 4 роки тому +2

      @@almacmathain6195 Loch Sloy! (Battle cry for clan MacFarlane - my bunch.)

  • @vincentzack
    @vincentzack 2 роки тому +2

    Arthur was know king at all. He was known as the the “Boar of Cornwall”. His
    infamous knights of the round table truly were bloodthirsty murderous thugs. Merlin on the other hand was truly a man of peace, for a time. Merlin was born on May 1st, 449 a.d. His first name, Merlin means the one with great knowledge. The Welsh version of Merlin is: Myrrdin, which means ‘the laughing one’. His last name was Emrys (Welsh), which means Ambrosia/Ambrosius, so he was also called Merlin/Myrddin Ambrosius Merlin’s mother was a daughter of the King Of the Demetier region. Merlin's father, King Morvyrn, was a visionary, and these visionary capabilities led to Merlin being referred to as a "scion of the devil," a magician, a sorcerer. The naïveté and simplicity of the Christian interpretation held that Merlin and his father's paranormal abilities meant that they were satanical, and that father and son were allied with the devil and thus fathered by him. Merlin was also a bard, a doctor, a teacher,
    a prophet, a historian and ultimately the Prince and King of the Druids of the Demetier tribe from South Wales. This whole area was the homeland of the Celts. The Plejaren Keridwena, who was a sister of Ptaah’s grandfather Ezekiel. Thus an Aunt of Sfaath, was sent on a mission to instruct Merlin in Henoch's teachings. Merlin, being a Celtic druid, was chosen in the hoped that with his help, Arthur, would transform Henoch's teachings of love, peace, harmony and the freedom and equality for all people into reality. The Holy Grail? A Grail was a sacred place with a spring, usually located on a mountain that the Celts considered a nature sanctuary, where also a druid’s grove was erected, surrounded by trees and other plants and was where the druids meditated in deep consciousness-related interconnection with water, the earth and plants as well as with the inexhaustibleness of life. These holy places were intended as places of meditation for the druids. They were numerous and indeed existed wherever druids lived and fulfilled their obligations. Over the years and centuries after this time Christian writers changed the word grail to mean the actual vessel, or cauldron into which Myrddin put Keridwena’s transcription of Henoch’s teaching. This is a fabrication woven into the stories and passed down through the ages as scripture which are nothing but falsehoods and fantasies. The grail was a place and had nothing to do with the apparent ’‹holy grail’ of Christianity which was only based on lies and deception; it never existed and therefore was not used by Joseph of Arimathea to collect the blood of Jmmanuel (Jesus) at his crucifixion as Christian lore attests, which on top of everything, represents a mishmash of different time periods, given that Myrddin existed about 350 years after the death of Jmmanuel. The true ‘holy grail’ only existed as a holy place.

  • @BaneHuntress
    @BaneHuntress 4 роки тому +12

    So the UK's love/hate relationship with rome and the pope goes back further than Henry VIII?... lol

    • @seanbeak4155
      @seanbeak4155 4 роки тому

      I think the 1st pope was British?

    • @ziggyzap1
      @ziggyzap1 4 роки тому +5

      @@seanbeak4155 the first pope was Saint Peter and he was born in Bethsaida, Galilea, Roman Empire Modern-day Israel/Syria depending on whose side you take on the Golan Heights issue.

    • @seanbeak4155
      @seanbeak4155 4 роки тому

      @@ziggyzap1 Nope, it was Linus I think

    • @ziggyzap1
      @ziggyzap1 4 роки тому +1

      @@seanbeak4155 Linus was the 2nd pope en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_popes#1st_millennium

    • @ziggyzap1
      @ziggyzap1 4 роки тому +2

      @@seanbeak4155 *About Saint Peter "He is recognized by the Catholic Church as the first Bishop of Rome appointed by Christ."

  • @nancygee1156
    @nancygee1156 4 роки тому +8

    Can you see the correlation to Jesus and the 12 disciples? The swords even look like crosses. The beginning of the Knights Templar.

    • @tesselaynes5428
      @tesselaynes5428 4 роки тому +3

      Thats what I figured. I also figure Arthur was manipulated by the catholic church and probably had some monk telling him what to do as this is when the catholic church took the opportunity or even made the opportunity to get their religious digs into the people with their false religion and their dreams of Roman supremacy. Thats what its all about. This whole world.

    • @layedbacklester
      @layedbacklester 4 роки тому +1

      The swords are that shape purely for practicality ,and the smithing technology of the day .

  • @philipmcdonagh1094
    @philipmcdonagh1094 3 роки тому +7

    Nothing like a good Francis Pryor documentation to make your day.

  • @traciaustin3613
    @traciaustin3613 4 роки тому +6

    Reminds me so much of The Art of fencing, which requires a certain amount of charisma, imo. A certain "gennosay qua"(sp).... perhaps that's why I'm so drawn towards all that....😉

  • @hihi-nm3uy
    @hihi-nm3uy 2 роки тому +1

    7:50
    it's so bullshit because when arthur DID come back, she ended up saving some small ass japanese town. twice. and didn't even set foot in britain.

  • @nathanf1162
    @nathanf1162 4 роки тому +10

    Don't people still throw weapons in rivers and lakes?

    • @nupurgautam1
      @nupurgautam1 4 роки тому +3

      Yes they do, not limited to Europe this happens in many other cultures

    • @almacmathain6195
      @almacmathain6195 4 роки тому +1

      In the UK weapons were thrown off of bridges and causeways until about 1400, but coins continue to be deposited in water even today.

    • @legacyShredder1
      @legacyShredder1 3 роки тому +5

      Yes. It's typical after a homicide.

    • @nupurgautam1
      @nupurgautam1 3 роки тому

      @@legacyShredder1 good one...😂

  • @72Yonatan
    @72Yonatan 3 роки тому +1

    Of course ancient British traditions survived Roman invasion. Fishborn is the evidence. Syncretism was the normal fashion, not oppressive colonization.

  • @Irish_For_Life1842
    @Irish_For_Life1842 Рік тому +1

    ""As an Archeologist I have always been skeptical about King Arthur"...Well that's not your job is it? King Arthur is an historical legend and means a lot to the British people not to be dismissed out of hand right at the beginning of your video." "Also the sarcastic remarks might well have been left out." Both from Vincent1000. "And as the video series progresses he gets even more arrogant, ironically ending with him creating his own mythology and presenting it as fact." from One Arm Daddy. I will add that I am deeply disappointed about the series. The arrogant and self righteous tone throughout was shameful. IMO there are two types of people when they look at myths like King Arthur. 1 Looks to understand the historical truth that was a basis for the myth. 2 Looks to do everything they can to bash at the myth. I see this series as the latter. Decide for yourself as you know what you like.

  • @reencollett6835
    @reencollett6835 4 роки тому +8

    This nice narrator reminded me of Theoden King of Rohan. [Apologies to that actor - he was very good] I tend to the idea of Atlantean immigrants much much earlier than the 'Romans', anyway. I don't suppose one would find any remnants of that.

    • @jm2058
      @jm2058 4 роки тому

      If they did it would be highly controlled, "Need to know" . Or it is kept in secret to not be lost to feed the narrative.

    • @annlouiseorgan3775
      @annlouiseorgan3775 4 роки тому +1

      Reen Collett I thought that some of the Celtic people came from Spain.

    • @reencollett6835
      @reencollett6835 4 роки тому

      @@annlouiseorgan3775 Totally! The Basques.

  • @Sean12248
    @Sean12248 4 роки тому +5

    As Cheesy as this dude is....it's very interesting.

  • @douglasg8827
    @douglasg8827 3 роки тому +3

    Camelot is an anglacized version of Cam-bus-Mael-Loc, meaning monstary of Saint Maeloc also known as Maelog and is a real place. Maeloc is the brother of Hael who became king of Strathclyde and fought against King Arthur. The cambus or campus is the seamonster the most common is the hippocampus - horse sea monster which was depicted as being white which was arthurs symbol and then there was the Wyrn which was the red dragon which was Hael's symbol. Hael is a abbreviated form of Michael (he who is like god) and he is known today as Saint Michael. Maeloc (MLK in paleo hebrew) was the spear bearer in ceremonies and his shorterned name Loc got added with Lance, i.e. Lancelot. Lancelot was expelled to Lugo in Email, Maeloc ended up in North West Spain in a place called Lugo, sound familure? ua-cam.com/video/VyaMqLaZoQo/v-deo.html, Rhydderch Hael king of Strathclyde, Rhu = red derch (Drake)=dragon saint Michael.

    • @petrovonoccymro9063
      @petrovonoccymro9063 10 місяців тому +1

      Nope. Named after Caermelyn, near Cardiff, which was the royal palace of the Kings of Glamorgan. Arthur, or Arthrwys, Welsh version, is named in the Llandaff. Cathedral Charters in both versions as King of Glamorgan after his father, King Meurig, and Grandfather, King Tewdric, an early Catholic saint. The charters thank the family regularly for the land gifts to the early Welsh Church. All of this was taught in Welsh schools until the 1920s, when Westminster decided to anglify British history and pretend Welsh history never happened at all. In the late 19th century, all Welsh speaking teachers were sacked and replaced by English speaking ones, even though ninety five per cent of kids spoke only Welsh. Arthur never was a myth. He was as real as you or I.

  • @shibolinemress8913
    @shibolinemress8913 3 роки тому +3

    The Romans being invited to Britain doesn't surprise me. As I've read, they liked to have a logical reason (real or fabricated) to conquer new territory. Often they were glad to "oblige" client kings or other friends of Rome who asked for their help in defeating local enemies.

  • @Schwarzkald
    @Schwarzkald 3 роки тому +1

    Christianity the destroyer of beautiful and marvelous things what a pity.

    • @whoarewe7515
      @whoarewe7515 3 роки тому

      Humans would do it for any reason doesn't have to be religion

  • @steviemadison2127
    @steviemadison2127 4 роки тому +4

    A Roman apologist "documentary."

    • @harleyquinn5774
      @harleyquinn5774 3 роки тому +2

      @U X Your beloved narration of history was originally a revisionist narrative for political/religion/patriotic/empire propaganda purposes. We now have better analysis through archeology (both analysis of old with updated technology and discovery of new excavations) to bring a more accurate narration to light with more accurately confirmed evidence to support it.

  • @ellenmarch3095
    @ellenmarch3095 4 роки тому +16

    Fun drinking game: Take a shot anytime Francis Pryor uses a first-person pronoun...

  • @gonefishing167
    @gonefishing167 3 роки тому +4

    If one wants ( or needs) to believe in the Arthurian legend ( and behind all stories of legend , there are facts) - then why not believe that Arthur did return in Britain’s darkest hour. Many believe that without Churchill , Britain may not have won the war. Arthur, true to legend, did return. He came back as Churchill to save his beloved Britain. O.k, Churchill may not have looked like an ideal ‘knight’ but he certainly did the job

  • @jowen85
    @jowen85 3 роки тому +1

    no Roman invasion? So why the huge fortress at Chester? Maybe looking at the Fens is the wrong place to look for Rome in England. The huge villa? The biggest profits with externals to huge empires like Rome are always made from trading something. The question should be, what was the person who owned that villa trading in order to be so connected with the emperor? People for the Roman armies?

    • @philaypeephilippotter6532
      @philaypeephilippotter6532 3 роки тому

      At the time *Britain* was tribal. A few tribes welcomed the *Romans,* a few fought them and a few, mostly in *Wales* and *Scotland,* ignored them.

  • @autumndemeranville7268
    @autumndemeranville7268 4 роки тому +5

    Too many commercials.

    • @TheBandit7613
      @TheBandit7613 3 роки тому +1

      Autumn, I'll assume you are watching on your phone.
      Anyway, take your finger and fast forward past the entire show, close to the end or at the end. Let the video finish. When it's finished, click on the re-watch button and all the commercials will be gone. Enjoy!

    • @tylerjerabek5204
      @tylerjerabek5204 3 роки тому

      Or get an Adblock

    • @TheBandit7613
      @TheBandit7613 3 роки тому

      @@tylerjerabek5204 Doesn't work well on phones. So fast forward and you're good to go.

    • @GustavoRodriguez-cv5qw
      @GustavoRodriguez-cv5qw 3 роки тому

      Don't watch them

  • @infinightsky
    @infinightsky 3 роки тому +1

    I like and respect Francis but I feel like his documentaries are mostly just him complaining that everyone is wrong about history

  • @sluggodna
    @sluggodna 7 місяців тому

    Looking in my family's past, i found a "Tristan" that arrested a "Loot Jackson" for killing a rabbit. This "Loot" had to do 20 years of silence at castle Uither.
    .
    Tristan could be Lancelot. But notice the name "Camelot" and (Lancelot) are To close. Did Loot write this under Silence of service?
    .
    Now, Loot was ?born? 1100 01-01..
    Or, his Knights were assembled on 01-01-1100?
    .
    Celts.
    Now , there is an ancient castle in England, half way over a hill. It had the tallest draw bridge ever seen. 9 stories tall..??
    .
    Update: 04/24/2024
    The king Arthur story was written to claim Britain had the stone of destiny. It was probably a sword in the destiny stone story at first. And the watcher Merlin. As you know, Merlin is a missing stone in a wall to give you a window.

  • @harrietharlow9929
    @harrietharlow9929 2 роки тому +1

    I think that the church picked up on the power of the land. Also, monasticism in general began in the desert and the fens and moors are about as close to a desert as you'll get in Britain.

  • @Shervin86
    @Shervin86 4 місяці тому

    This is the work of an angry nationalist refusing to accept their history, including backward trends and horrendous acts of their ancestors (much like all human civilizations during those times).
    As an "archeologist" using myths of Arthur to prove a personal opinion about historical fact, is like using the Bible to argue the existence of God; or for a better more relative comparison, and Iranian claiming that the works of Ferdowsi in Shah'name are all factual and true history of Iran.😂
    I watched all episodes, and it's all subjective speculations.

  • @davidnelmes5357
    @davidnelmes5357 4 місяці тому

    The Roman empire constructed the misnamed Offa's dyke. A king whose presumed greatness is directly related to the attribution of a part of the Roman limes system to his hand. It is a work of Empire and of Septimus Severus who both constructed the dyke and repaired the northern walls. Just excavate and all will be clarified.

  • @oldmanfromscenetwentyfour8164
    @oldmanfromscenetwentyfour8164 5 місяців тому

    The only things the Romans took when they left was their Army, Families, Gold and Silver that they had and Personal effects. The Britons learned how to build roads and bridges, stone walls and towers, writing and accounting, additional medicines, improved skills at all levels. It wasn't a Dark Age, there were a few natural disasters that set things back, the Comet of 562 did a lot of damage and the Plague of 541 decimated the Population. With all that going on who has time to document it all!

  • @ilkeadrall710
    @ilkeadrall710 3 роки тому +1

    Archaeologists invented, archaeologists have invented, archaeologists intent. Will archaeologists invent? A coming future on real facts?

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    So It means through prince Linus of Brittany also known as Tiberio Claudio Herculinus I descent also from king Uther Pendragon and from his son king Arthur Pendragon through Cunedda Wledig of Wales but also Macsen Wledig of Wales

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    I descent also from queen Cordelia also known as Cornelia Locrina of England daughter of King Lyr of England, queen Cordelia Locrina She was mother of prince Heli Belinus of Gauls

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    Through my grandfather and my father I descent from Tiberio Claudio Herculinus also known as prince Linus of Brittany son of King Caractaco the Pendragon and of Claudia Herculina also known as empress Claudia of Rome daughter of Claudio of Rome also known as Claudio Ercolano or simply Ercolano

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    Grandchild's Genealogy Tree of King Caractaco the Pendragon from Rome to Gargano Mount in Northern Apulia and I belong to Caractaco's Genealogy Tree

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    Because king Caractaco the Pendragon he was send in exile from Brittany to Rome in Italy by emperor Claudio of Rome father of empress Claudia of Rome Caractaco's wife

  • @Willy_Tepes
    @Willy_Tepes Рік тому

    Churches and abbeys were built beside ancient pagan sites to stamp out the former religion. That is why you will often find them with bronze age grave mounds. The collapse of this civilization was due to the sea receding and leaving all their maritime infrastructure 90 meters above sea level. People just kept on living there, but the social and economic structure collapsed. With all their coastal forts (hill top forts) now miles innland, the country was open to invasion.
    By the way. There is a port at Fisherton de la Mer, just south west of Stonehenge. You will see it if you realize the importance of the shoreline to human habitation. But you archeologists are so set in your theories. Take a good look at those LIDAR images, zoom out, see the greater picture.

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    Princess Anna Angharad of Aremathea She was daughter of Joseph of Aremathea the Holy Grail's Guardian

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    So It means I descent also from prince Heli Belinus of the Gauls too because he was father of King Lud III and princess Anna Angharad of Aremathea She was mother of King Lud III

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    King Tasciovan also known as Theomantius of Britains and Celts he was son of King Lud III of Britains and Celts and from queen Luna Locrina also known as Antonia Minor

  • @messymatthewstudios
    @messymatthewstudios 8 місяців тому

    I love how at some point after the six minute mark, this guy just rants off a list of random places reputed for having some Arthurian connection to it like he trolling them xD

  • @12HDudeY12
    @12HDudeY12 4 роки тому +3

    Someone nicked the sword 😂

  • @matthewthomas0330
    @matthewthomas0330 Рік тому

    PROPHECY BECAME LEGEND
    REVELATION 14:14
    "ONE LIKE THE SON OF MAN"
    14 OVER-SEAS TERRITORIES

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    So It means I descent also from king Divitiacus II of Soisson he was father of prince Heli Belinus of the Gauls

  • @andyaim4764
    @andyaim4764 4 роки тому +2

    My history teacher LIED to me!!! 😂😂😂

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    I descent also from king Tasciovan also known as king Theomantius of Britains and Celts or called Tiberio

  • @GrizrazRex
    @GrizrazRex 2 роки тому +1

    Arthur indeed returned to save his nation. He came as The Few of 1940.

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    Soisson Is the Land of the famouse Cup of Soisson but also Franks and Merovingians land

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    Divitiacus II 's Kingdom between Brittany and France Belgium

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    So I am the last princess and future Pendragon Queen of Holy Grail

  • @billybeerman2657
    @billybeerman2657 4 роки тому +1

    Interesting stuff. But the adds every 3 minutes, so annoying!

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    In old welsh language Angharad It means Stone's Lord also known as The Scone

  • @GregJay
    @GregJay 4 роки тому +1

    Cramming for an upcoming stream on Arthur in America looking forward to it. The 2nd Arthur that is, apparently there were 4 of them, I feel there is some kind of a connection with King Arthur and Hyperborea, judging from the brief shot of the swans perhaps that is a popular thought.Interesting the sun was in Southern skies, the Native Americans north and south claimed the same thing, but it was not the sun it was our first sun. Pretty crazy.

    • @davidgould5708
      @davidgould5708 4 роки тому

      Check out alan wilson/ king Arthur. Bloody mind blowing stuff

    • @philaypeephilippotter6532
      @philaypeephilippotter6532 4 роки тому +1

      @@davidgould5708
      I have apparently investigated more rigorously than you.
      *Alan Wilson* is apparently a delusional, probably paranoid, schizophrenic who won't allow any of his so-called evidence or artefacts to be tested by experts. If any _properly qualified_ archæologist or historian disagrees with him he just vehemently says he is right and they are wrong. The so-called _ancient_ *Welsh* language he lauds, *_Coelbren y Beirdd,_* is actually an alphabet, a forgery perpetrated by *Edward Williams,* aka *_Iolo Morganwg,_* in the eighteenth century. *Wilson* actually hates the *Welsh* so the *_Arthur_* of legend doesn't get a look in. He and *_Blackett_* had his books published by a _vanity_ publishing company they bought for the purpose as no reputable publisher would touch them. They have almost certainly damaged archæological sites.
      *_Blackett,_* whose real name is *Brian Andrew Terry,* was convicted of handling stolen property and, like *Wilson,* is deluded although he may have encouraged *Wilson* out of some kind of malice or mischief.
      www.badarchaeology.com/controversies/looking-for-king-arthur/the-archaeology-of-arthur/
      beechwood44.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/wilson-and-blackett-for-beginners/
      ua-cam.com/video/bI5MlEZSHdw/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/2pkJKy6HxKE/v-deo.html

    • @davidgould5708
      @davidgould5708 4 роки тому

      @@philaypeephilippotter6532 oh dear another sap. Ever considered why certain people that go against the accepted narrative have their characters assassinated?
      Suppose you believe all mainstream media...hows the hypoxia treating you?

    • @philaypeephilippotter6532
      @philaypeephilippotter6532 4 роки тому

      @@davidgould5708
      Have _you_ ever considered that mainstream media can be *_right?_*
      *_Johnny_* is rarely the only one in step.

  • @visitrasyidmanapadvertiser4875
    @visitrasyidmanapadvertiser4875 2 роки тому +1

    🇲🇾visit

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    So It means I descent also from king Cunobelinus the Pendragon too

  •  4 роки тому +2

    Er china Had a great Wall OOOOOooooooOOOOOO

  • @moyiezung5200
    @moyiezung5200 3 роки тому +4

    I have been searching for this for a long time now. Artorius!!!!

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    King Caractaco the Pendragon he was born in Avalon in Wales

  • @stevecox339
    @stevecox339 4 роки тому +23

    I love this subject matter but I just can't take an ad roughly every two minutes. So frustrating and disruptive, and disrespectful to the material being covered.

    • @waynemcgowan3221
      @waynemcgowan3221 4 роки тому +8

      Skip to end let it finish then Replay

    • @flashers.5212
      @flashers.5212 4 роки тому +2

      Isn’t it just but try Wayne’s tip... sit back & enjoy.

    • @americanparser
      @americanparser 4 роки тому +1

      @@flashers.5212 It isn't "just?" What does that mean?

    • @americanparser
      @americanparser 4 роки тому

      UA-cam Premium, my friend. No strategies, no tricks, no commercials.

    • @angluneenon
      @angluneenon 4 роки тому

      it's because it's briton stuff on an american website.

  • @nickacelvn
    @nickacelvn 4 роки тому +2

    16min is that an ulfberht sword?

    • @RaidenWard
      @RaidenWard 4 роки тому +1

      no its not. Wrong type of blade. notice the lack of central ripple.
      Wrong crossgaurd as well but they could a aftermarket lol

  • @tammiejahshan8233
    @tammiejahshan8233 4 роки тому +2

    Fond it very interesting

  • @komododragon118
    @komododragon118 3 роки тому +1

    Why was King’s Arthur’s history suppressed? Why was he made mythical? What are they hiding about him? He was real!!!!!!

    • @douglasg8827
      @douglasg8827 3 роки тому +1

      Why was King’s Arthur’s history suppressed? because he was descended from Scythian cavalry officer that was attached to the 6th legion on Hadrians wall. Arthur was therefore pagan specifically worshipped the great snake in the sky which originally was called Apep from ancient Egypt. The symbol in the 2nd century was a curved double headed snake which represented the milkyway. Apep swallowed the sun, and if you look on Scythian cavalry shield you will see the snake swallowing the sun. For evidence of this symbol look at trusy's hill Dumfries scotland. by the 6th century this snake had become romanised as a white sea horse monster called the hippocampus. The christians of the 11th century could not accept a hero as a pagan and therefore Arthur became a christian despite his adviser Merlin being pagan. Merlin is Mere = horse and Linn = pool associated with a waterfall, and this itself is a direct connection with the Hippocampus. The white hippocampus later became the white unicorn the national animal of Scotland. The old swastica symbol is the same origins and would represent the everlasting night and day cycle.

    • @douglasg8827
      @douglasg8827 3 роки тому

      In simple terms, Arthur was pagan hence Arthur's advisor Merlin also being pagan. He did not covert to Christianity but actively fought against them. It was not politically correct for Geoffrey of Monmouth to make Arthur pagan but change the storey slightly to Arthur Christian. Arthur was descended from Scythian horsemen who were stationed on the Hadrian's wall and if you research this you will see they worshipped the snake or at least the snake in the sky which swallowed the sun. This comes directly from ancient Egyptian cult of Apep and Set. Set is the snake in the night sky (constellation of drako (dragon)) Set is where we get the name Satan prince of darkness, the en at then end means the people of Set, in the same way Women is Womb-en, people with a womb. In Scotland we have Arthur's Or'n often called Arthur's oven where babies and animals were burned in ritual sacrifice in a paleo hebrew (before Isaac) tradition. This fire festival was called Baal worship and where the term Beltaine, Bael-Stain comes from in the UK and is also a fire ceremony. The stain or stone was the base of the Baal ritual temple with a metal image of a human cow on top. So you can clearly understand why this was suppressed. Arthur fought and killed Hael king of Strathclyde who's name is an abbreviation of saint Mic-Hael, which itself is also supressed, you can't tell the tale of Arthur without saint Michael king of Strathclyde. The swords name is interesting Excalibur, ex as an prefix is to make the name Christian, this in modern terms is where we get the term crossing something out. Bar at the end is the old term for a hill signifying a location. Cali is the old name of Scotland Caledonian, however there is a specific location for Cali and this is the same location as where we get the name Camelot. Its the same place with different names for different reasons. So the story is true it has just been distorted over the years. There are placename nearby with the name Arthur but I fall into the belief Arthur is a nickname coming from the Roman Atheos (atheist) and thir meaning land, or land of the atheist. His real name is likely to be Coroticus, read Saint Patrick's Confessio, letter to the soldiers of Coroticius. This term Coro is similar to Cora which again is a short distance away and this translates in greek to Maiden and where the legend of the castle of maidens comes from. And yes I can also tell you what Camelot is, what it means and where it is.

  • @belindaelisa5618
    @belindaelisa5618 2 роки тому

    'Billy' Eduard Albert Meier (BEAM) ua-cam.com/video/6hhxgdHhzY4/v-deo.html

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    All the Pendragons Kings crowned on Scone

  • @donnablackman3954
    @donnablackman3954 2 роки тому +1

    Very educational ❤️

  • @denisestevens2540
    @denisestevens2540 2 роки тому

    Arthurien Lagend is Real History mixed with Tall Tales of real Prophesy War of the Roses 🌹

  • @elijahhodges4405
    @elijahhodges4405 3 роки тому

    The Islands helped keep Rome in bread. You don't mess with the society in the Islands if you want the bread. As long as Britain paid their taxes Rome was happy.

  • @valnpaulvanorden
    @valnpaulvanorden 3 роки тому

    I have studied a "book of hours" of Anne of Cleves....I believe she was a Mrs. Henry #8 (queen Anne...like Queen Annes lace..the wild carrpt flower. or a time. Anyway it has lots of little gargoyle creatures in margin.

  • @richardwilmotph.d6747
    @richardwilmotph.d6747 4 роки тому +7

    Ads every 6 minutes!

  • @nicholassudov2299
    @nicholassudov2299 4 роки тому

    Romans as "liberators"? Why not? Conquistadores liberated a number of lesser Indian tribes from Aztec imperial oppression, replacing it their own less brutal abd blood-thirsty oppression.

  • @nicolakunz231
    @nicolakunz231 2 роки тому

    "All of this would be fine, were it not Complete Rubbish!" Such a Brit! Now I have to watch the whole thing.

  • @chriswilliams7480
    @chriswilliams7480 4 роки тому +1

    England centric. No mention of the Llyn Fawn Hoard

  • @chrisphilhower6029
    @chrisphilhower6029 4 роки тому +1

    At 43:26, Did I see Swastikas in the Mosaic floor?

    • @jm2058
      @jm2058 4 роки тому +4

      That sign existed long before it was called a swastika. Look up Atlantean Gardens.

    • @nupurgautam1
      @nupurgautam1 4 роки тому +6

      @@jm2058 Swastika is a Sanskrit word, it has been called Swastika for over 5000 years, and we(My culture) still worship it till date..... As we still associate ourselves to our ancestors.

    • @yatinpatil4067
      @yatinpatil4067 3 роки тому +2

      Yes holy hindu symbol

  • @erc621
    @erc621 Рік тому

    I belong to Catuvellauni tribe

  • @jamesdolan4042
    @jamesdolan4042 4 роки тому +18

    I was always taught that the mythological King Arthur and his knights of the roundtable were from Wales, and did not regard themselves as Britons. I was always taught the Anglo Saxons were from the very north of Germany and the very east of Denmark and their coming was characterized by the saga of Beowulf. They apparently settled in east Anglia.

    • @mariapierce2707
      @mariapierce2707 4 роки тому +3

      check out Alan Wilson

    • @Armylady74
      @Armylady74 4 роки тому +5

      Maria Pierce thanks for the suggestion! I’m going to finish this series and the watch the Alan guy. Interesting topic about the 2 Arthur’s! Shame real history is covered up!

    • @mariapierce2707
      @mariapierce2707 4 роки тому +2

      Yes his research is not to be ignored!

    • @tesselaynes5428
      @tesselaynes5428 4 роки тому +1

      So did you find out what you think you know from movies?

    • @jamesdolan4042
      @jamesdolan4042 4 роки тому +1

      @@tesselaynes5428 No Tess.

  • @gabemore1766
    @gabemore1766 Рік тому

    King Arthur was Welsh

  • @tesselaynes5428
    @tesselaynes5428 4 роки тому +1

    Apparently you havent read the royal family tree which says that theyre descended from King Arthur and King David. I think they went from Babylon through Egypt then Greece then Rome then Germany and then Britain then North America and thats why first nations have to deal with the supremecist attitude from visitors..

    • @rubynibs
      @rubynibs 4 роки тому

      Ambitious royals, royal wannabes, aristocrats, and aristocrat wannabes often (if not always) padded their pedigrees. The King David they refer to is King David of Scotland. They didn't begin in Babylon, or Egypt, or Greece, or Rome. The "Germans" on the throne today were royal Germans, related to many royal houses of Europe, including the English, via Queen Victoria.
      Indians do not have to deal with any sort of supremacist attitude.
      Where on earth do you get these wild stories?

    • @teovu5557
      @teovu5557 3 роки тому

      @@rubynibs The English Are Germans linguistically and ethnically are they not?

    • @teovu5557
      @teovu5557 3 роки тому

      @@rubynibs The English Are Germans linguistically and ethnically are they not?

    • @rubynibs
      @rubynibs 3 роки тому

      @@teovu5557 English is a Germanic language, as are Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Icelandic, Old Norse, Dutch, Flemish, and a few others. This does not mean the English are Germans linguistically. And English was strongly influenced by French and the Scandinavian languages. English royalty will almost certainly find their beginnings can be traced back to the Normans, who's forefathers had been Danish and Norwegian Vikings.
      The English have been estimated to have a good deal of northern German blood, and Scandinavian blood, too, though I'm not certain enough tests have been carried out to determine that. Ethnically, however, they are English.
      I do use the term, "anti-Germanic" when anyone criticizes behavior by an any member of the English tribe - and make no mistake: the English tribe's roots go deeper than some tribe's do. There's a group from out of an area north of Georgia, who converted to a religion starting around 700 AD, I think it was. The conversion seems to have continued for several centuries, while these largely nomadic people roamed all over the place. Today, they claim to have roots in still another part of the world. DNA tests, however, are surprising them, as they are finding out their roots are not from where they thought, and are far shallower than the average Englishman's roots.

    • @teovu5557
      @teovu5557 3 роки тому

      @@rubynibs The Anglo-Saxons came from the German area still called Angles(English) and Saxony(Saxon land). The English are indeed a West Germanic people. And the English Dynasty have changed families many times. Today's Windsor family are from the Germanic Saxe-coburg and Gotha family while the Norman-french line of English royals are no longer ruling England.

  • @terrig5704
    @terrig5704 4 роки тому +4

    Really!!! The ads make it impossible to relax and enjoy the content.

    • @GeorgHaeder
      @GeorgHaeder 4 роки тому +2

      Use an ad blocker. adblockplus.org/

  • @bexhill8777
    @bexhill8777 4 роки тому

    you call it the real,but Start with rome...a whole lot hidden...rubbish

  • @ilkeadrall710
    @ilkeadrall710 3 роки тому

    So, bye by to christianty welcome to pagans, ...

  • @RalphEllis
    @RalphEllis 4 роки тому +2

    Arthur is not mentioned by Gildas or Bede, and Arthur’s story is not narrated by Nennius, Malmsbury (1st chronicle), and Huntingdon, and was mocked by Newburgh. Arthur’s story only arrived in 1135, when Crusaders and Templars arrived back from the First Crusade, and this story was narrated by Monmouth and Oxford. So who was King Arthur?
    The clue is that the Round Table was modelled on the Last Supper table (see book: Merlin Grail). So King Arthur and his twelve knights of the round table, are synonymous with King Jesus and his twelve disciples of the round last supper table. And the table itself was modelled upon the Jewish zodiac at Hamat Teverya on the Sea of Galilee, and its twelve constellations. In addition, many of the early manuscripts say that Arthurian legend was written by Josephus Flavius - which has caused a great deal of head-scratching.
    So what is the answer to all this? In reality, the Crusaders brought home the secular history of Jesus. But since this story was highly heretical, they formulated this story into Arthurian legend. The uncomfortable truth is that King Arthur was King Jesus.
    See book ‘The Grail Cypher’.
    www.amazon.co.uk/Grail-Cypher-secrets-Arthurian-revealed-ebook/dp/B0152BGX7A
    Ralph

    • @philaypeephilippotter6532
      @philaypeephilippotter6532 3 роки тому

      *Ralph Ellis*
      You've got it right.
      The idiot incompetent historian who claims that *_King Arthur_* is real is *Alan Wilson,* apparently a delusional, probably paranoid, schizophrenic who won't allow any of his so-called evidence or artefacts to be tested by experts. If any _properly qualified_ archæologist or historian disagrees with him he just vehemently says he is right and they are wrong. The so-called _ancient_ *Welsh* language he lauds, *_Coelbren y Beirdd,_* is actually an alphabet, a forgery perpetrated by *Edward Williams,* aka *_Iolo Morganwg,_* in the eighteenth century. *Wilson* actually hates the *Welsh* so the *_Arthur_* of legend doesn't get a look in. He and his friend *_Blackett_* had his books published by a _vanity_ publishing company they bought for the purpose as no reputable publisher would touch them. They have almost certainly damaged archæological sites.
      *_Blackett,_* whose real name was *Brian Andrew Terry,* was convicted of handling stolen property and, like *Wilson,* was deluded although he may have encouraged *Wilson* out of some kind of malice or mischief.

    • @RalphEllis
      @RalphEllis 2 роки тому

      @@philaypeephilippotter6532 And Blackett forged the so-called silver cross of Arthur. It was a pure forgery.
      R

  • @lukemcinerny8220
    @lukemcinerny8220 4 роки тому +2

    Lol funny they show 13/14th century longswords when talking about excaliber

  • @catosullivan6790
    @catosullivan6790 4 роки тому

    Hollywood in Wicklow is not in Britain and was not in Britain at that time

  • @kallesmoker1049
    @kallesmoker1049 3 роки тому

    its a werry good folklore but still they have no wer else find any records off real wars that king arthur have be in only folklore on the things but never ever record off it in scripts or books nothing . only just folklore and thats sad . but still great fantazy story!!!

    • @FireInTheSoul
      @FireInTheSoul 3 роки тому

      Arthur, the war king. Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett.

  • @rayjasmantas9609
    @rayjasmantas9609 Рік тому

    The thing about King Arthur having to represent the Gov't being factual - to properly work, is he might have tried to include fact finding of things like ancient aliens hide outs that since have been found as transparent to mass caves and use to be considered as dragon lairs - - or something that should be explained with a expression to help record for the research of how evidence collection is avoiding detections. Easily a myth start by a nation to just taking precautions to stay factual as the road is the way to lead to somewhere in common. The point of being able to share continued.

    • @rayjasmantas9609
      @rayjasmantas9609 Рік тому

      After all the Church uniting was seen to have its spies too of community activities, thus given a story to test if it makes the medieval news.

    • @rayjasmantas9609
      @rayjasmantas9609 Рік тому

      And the other important about Arthur was he a few other men from England use to serve with the Roman Army finding a send out teams to control hostel tribes or such disturbances.
      Thus would have built friendly inside of the unrealistic side of the Roman Empire of the ones wanting to own souls.

    • @rayjasmantas9609
      @rayjasmantas9609 Рік тому

      Look at Cicero, (a town now in Illinois were the mafia has its gang naming name as the Arch Dukes) setting up Rome to be conquered during peace time as a declared spy on the Council of Rome with a mass accumulation of men from other nations to join a attempted assault on Rome.

    • @rayjasmantas9609
      @rayjasmantas9609 Рік тому

      Or working with examples of history building up, is who would believe Mexico having non drug using families, but that is who is warning of their bandidos friend.

    • @rayjasmantas9609
      @rayjasmantas9609 Рік тому

      And I believe the logic of Baptizing is to bring a person back down to feeling like a individual and not influenced without knowing it was part of the person's own decision making.

  • @eifionwynwilliams-iffy1288
    @eifionwynwilliams-iffy1288 2 роки тому

    This myth of one Arthur rolls on and on...

  • @nizaralsammour4051
    @nizaralsammour4051 Рік тому

    P

  • @Tsun_Wu_Kong-Hanuman
    @Tsun_Wu_Kong-Hanuman 4 роки тому

    Bullshit.