DAMN YOU DAVID ZASLAV!!! What do you think about the Suicide Squad game & all future WB games being live-service experiences? Let me know all of your thoughts and be sure to like, share, comment, and subscribe! Thank you all so much for watching!
I actually don't mind it and think the gameplay looks good along with amazing movement mechanics. If they play this cards right than it could be a pretty decent live service game.
Well it's a good thing I like DC and Marvel so until DC get their s*** together I'm going to side with Marvel and their characters and Spider-Man is already a hit and it's going to be a matter of time before Wolverine be next.
It still drives me crazy that we don’t have a rocksteady Superman game because personally for me a Superman game under rocksteady flying around metropolis using his powers would’ve been really awesome and tons of fun in my opinion.
@@thedarkknightman6150 same here as well and honestly if there’s one character who deserves there own game it would be Superman, especially seeing Superman Clark Kent Lois lane and my boy Jonathan Samuel Kent superboy as his little 10 year old self being a family in a video game would be freaking fantastic in my opinion.
Same, especially since this game will be the very last time we'll hear the late Kevin Conroy's Batman in anything really. Sheer goddamn arrogance and hubris.
@@M64brosI did. I know what he said. It's not his personal decision. It's an entire board of execs and investors who want to do what Bungie did. Build a on the surface live service system and than sell for a profit and get out of the video game industry which is losing everyone money atm with costs of making games being ridiculous. So WB wants out. They've wanted out for a while now, and they're long term plan is to sell their studio and let someone else deal with game making whilst they'd get royalties of course because they own the properties still. Does that suck for consumers who would like to see good SP DC games? Absolutely. But that's more a reflection on the state of the gaming market atm than on David personally. You can blame him if you want though, never said anyone can't.
@@Tedi652 I get what you're talking about and I get what you mean, however and regardless, I still have faith in this game and I really don't want it to get screwed up from the get-go, It might a tiny bit but hopefully it should get some positivity by the time it releases.
When WBs president said hes going to be foucusing on live service games for the future of their gaming division, I lost all hope for any future games from them. RIP WB games.
I am really sad.. A company that discriminates against people. The company that sells this game. It is "Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League - Deluxe Edition" and its sale is not allowed in my country. Guys, what kind of platform is this? What does it mean to distinguish people? Game is a means of entertainment. Why did you restrict children's access to games? I've seen companies go bankrupt. and I've seen companies rising. Those who rise are those who serve without discriminating against anyone. By doing this, by separating people, their name gradually disappears. Give up this wrong practice. Putting obstacles in the world's children and the game world will not gain you anything, it will only make you lose.. Also when I learned that the game was not good and not worth buying. I said, "I'm glad I didn't buy this game." My only regret is that, as a human being, the sale of this game has been blocked in my country, which makes me feel very bad. Imagine that you can buy games on a platform. When you want to buy this game, it says that the game is not available for sale in your country. Imagine if such a situation happened to you. Even though I have no bad intentions, I'm just an innocent game enthusiast. Isn't this unfair?
WB Games just gave me all the good reasons to skip EVERYTHING they are going to make in the future. This just shows how lacking their research skills are. How come Marvel's Avengers, the Suicide Squad gameplay feedback and Spider-Man franchise destroying records weren't enough for them to acknowledge nobody wants live-service superhero garbage? Single player has ALWAYS been better than multiplayer. The last good Batman game was Arkham Knight and the TRUE last good DC game in general was Injustice 2.
WB is already in talks of turning Hogwarts Legacy into a live-service game for the sequel. The game is already being eyed down, as I’ve heard & being considered with that attempting approach. They are their own downfall, such a greedy company. I hope people wake up, and put their foot down that this isn’t what majority of us gamers want in these games.
That intro 😂. I am definitely interested in the story, since it’s set in the Arkhamverse (Arkham City is in my top 5 games of all time) and Harley and Deadshot look fun to play but it’s everything else I am concerned about. The live service and that Rocksteady have made their open world lifeless once again, with no civilians, only Brainiac’s goons. Plus, the fact that it’s online only, even if you play solo with AI bots for your companions, is stupid.
For me the worst part is that the movement and shooting actually looks pretty fun. If this were a 10-15 hour linear single player game it’s probably be good. But the fact they’re forcing in an open world, multiplayer, battle passes, loot that only serves to grind, a billion different currencies, and constant updates to keeps you playing for hundreds of hours kills any chance of that.
I actually thought the recent presentation focusing on the story and gameplay actually was quite good but it's disappointing to see a full open world metropolis that isnt focused on being a Superman game I don't want to kill the justice league I want to play as them
Dc games used to be good now they have gone downhill. Their last great game was I think it's Injustice 2. But seriously they used to beat Marvel in ganing now Marvel is beating them. Gotham Knights was atrocious and this seems like it will be even worse. Marvel's Spider Man 2 > all DC live service games
In the quest to over monetize a game they are going to shoot themselves in the foot, it’s looking like Marvels Avengers all over, but worse because this time they “should” know it’s a bad idea
@@briandavion right lol maybe I’m the only one that checked out halfway through the game 🤷🏽♂️ 😂 never touched a dlc luckily didn’t experience how trash their version of Spidey was 🙏
And not to mention, Marvels Avengers at least had melee combat the characters were more true to their origins than what they are doing with suicide squad 🤦🏽♂️
@@jordanmichael6263 yeah, TBH avenegrs end game online stuff was boring and grindy but the game play wasn't bad, had they not forced a live service aspect and just kept the campaign as the thing people proably woulda had mostly positive things to say about the game.
It really is a shame because DC has so much potential to make bangers with a lot characters in the roster they could make games for besides just Batman, we could've got a rocksteady Superman game after the Arkham series but instead WB makes them work on a live service suicide squad game nobody asked for. They could've learned from Spider-man 2 or their own game released this year called Hogwarts legacy but it looks like WB doesn't want good money. 🤷♂
You dont tell a world champion in ping pong to change racket sport and start playing tennis because its more money to earn. This is what greedy WB did. They only saw the money that " could be made" out of a live service game and not if the developers had knowleadge to do it. I hope it will bite WB in the ass and i think it will. 8 years of development cant be cheap and i dont think it will sell very well or that people play it for long or that sold cosmetica will earn them more than if they had sold millions more copies of a great single player experince.
Feel so bad for rocksteady this isn't something they ever wanted to do. This easily could've been a justice league or shit even a superman game but they choose the freakin suicide squad 😂
This games traversal looks good but the combat looks terrible, the opposite of the avengers. Whoever decided to make this game over a new superman game or a justiceleague game should be fired. Also how are they teasing ivy , isnt she dead??
I cannot believe we will have gotten 3 crappy looter/shooter superhero games in the last 3 years. First it was Avengers, then Gotham Knights, and now Suicide Squad. Why do they keep trying this??? The two genres clearly don’t mix
Guardians of the galaxy was a looter shooter 🤷♂️ and it was good. Problem is nobody gave it a chance at first after avengers, not until it was too late and the game did bad financially and it’s why we don’t have a sequel
@@morris01 it was great. I don’t think it qualifies as a looter shooter though. Looter shooters almost always involve a gear-based progression system (which I hate with every fiber of my being) which Guardians didn’t have. Looter shooters can have good combat, it’s just that Avengers and (somewhat)Gotham Knights had really bad and repetitive combat. It was such a chore to progress through both of those games because of how grindy the progression was, and how unrewarding the combat felt. Guardians was awesome all around though. Hopefully Suicide Squad will follow in its footsteps
A very wait and see experience. I think the game will be decent gameplay wise. The worst that can happen is being too heavy on the shooting looter aspect.
The reason games like this exist is honestly something you have to blame the modern gamer for. I know company's are the easy ones to blame, (and yea I completely agree) but I can't put 100% fault on the company's or devs. It's the success of games like Fortnite, PUBG,etc that bring in the large bucks over time. When there was a boom for single player offline games, some gamers took that for granted, while other just couldn't be satisfied with what they got... always craving more and asking the devs to provide the content for free or paid dlc. Unfortunately devs are people to and they need to eat too, so when they came up with live service games to provide everything gamers wanted... people still complained. I get it I want a good Rockstedy game too, but until the consumers truly change and understand the true value of what they want and not buy into Major games like fortnite, 2k etc. This is what we'll get, so that they can bring home the bread, and satisfy the people that thus game targets.. Sorry for the long rant, but this problem is on both sides.
I think the biggest problem for people with these games is the story almost always suffers the game play loop is always repetitive and not fun after a couple hours that being said I think this one has a chance to fix those things just maybe
Well good thing I like both and until DC get their s*** together I'm going to side with Marvel for now and Spider-Man it's already a hit what's the matter of time before Wolverine
I wonder why they don’t give the 4 player co-op games a buy 1 get 1 deal, the biggest appeal is that you get together with 3 of you friends as the suicide squad and kill the justice league, if I were to buy the game, my friend would automatically get it as well because we are game sharing but then only two out of four of us get to play the game, so if they were to give a code to give to my friend, he would get the game for free and our other friend that he game shares with will too. It would be the best way to bring in people in my opinion. Because I know I won’t get the game if my friends don’t get it, so it will really encourage people to spend 70 dollars for it. Does this make sense chat or would they lose money doing this?
It Takes Two did it so you could experience the game with your friend, why can’t they start doing this with more co-op games that are more than 2 players ya know??
With this way all 4 of us could play the game but we don’t all have to spend tons of money to actually play it. I mean come on. Do they really expect 4 people to spend 70$ each to play together, everyone’s situation is different but this is the type of game that SHOULD be played with all of your friends.
WB learned nothing from Gotham Knights. Know your audience. DC gamers just want a new single player game that plays like the Arkham games. People already hate games as a Service as it is, but I think there going to be surprised just how much Arkham fans hate it.
Learned nothing from the failure of Gotham Knights & Avengers. Learned nothing from the success of the Arkham & Spider-Man games. It’s concerning how out of touch WB is.
The only reason I'm getting this game next year is the story, open world, cutscenes, graphics, and character designs. I'm not going to buy any mirotransations but if there are story dlcs or new characters I'll buy.
I’m getting this game cause it looks fun to play with my friends Graphically it looks good Traversal looks fun Story looks good And Kevin Conroy… period I don’t mind the shooter aspect but I would’ve definitely preferred something else. Only thing that really bugs me is always online… I have great internet but the fact that when they are done with this game you’ll never be able to play ever again even if you love it. That’s really sad and dumb for me.
@@ID0XX I have money to spend, just ain't spending it on live service trash. Got better games to buy FF7 Rebirth, Wolverine, Elden Ring DLC, etc, etc. I will be playing quality games while yoi have fun doing chores with those trash battlepasses.
This reminds me of the "greed is good" quote. I hope it tanks hard so that other publishers stop trying to force these kinds of games on gamers only for them to die in agony. The future of gaming seems bleek if publishers keep focusing on game design that tries to maximize profit over enjoyment. RIP Rocksteady
I love Rocksteady but we shouldn’t support this game at all, this is a wake up call to everyone who still believes in storytelling/singleplayer games, wb needs to learn people won’t support their garbage pressured projects 😅
The world looked so bland in the first trailers I saw, now it looks gorgeous. Its very important to have visual great environments to traverse in these open world games. Traversal looks very good and I combat looks ok for a shooter. This game is defiantly 100% going to be and do better than Gotham Knight . Might get it but I dont do ministrations, so would treat it as a single player. If I have to pay to beat the game I wouldn't get it
@JustAG3mini I could be fooled like gotham nights, but it's cool that you can shoot swinging from the grappling hooks with Harley Quinn. I mean it's a shooter so that different. There seems to be melee finishes like in Spiderman. But in the Arkham Knight the combat is so much better, more animations
I am super worried with Wonder Woman game now thanks to stupid david zaslave nonsense logic with his terrible live service logic which isn’t going to work in my opinion.
Guy named Captain Boomarang - Rocksteady give him a gun Harley quinn who's iconic item is a bat or huge mallet - Rocksteady give her a gun A mutated man into a shark - Rocksteady give him a gun 😅 So yeah strip away all their unique traits from the comics and give them guns gotcha! No thanks Rocksteady you are no longer getting my money.
It’s one of those things that they just keep trying to push. I say boycott the whole thing because it worked with Shadow of War and if ppl stay strong, it will work with this too. They will also push it very hard to get sales because this insider vid proves it. Spider-Man didn’t have one. It’s a disappointment, for me. I think if anyone is interested will lose money.
I think If they made it were you play as the justice league instead people would like the game more. Though in my opinion, everyone would be wanting to play probably either Superman or Batman but that be a fun co-op game.
The Suicide game I don't like the whole live service thing but I will say not every superhero game has to be single-player this, single-player that, etc.
Its so crazy that every live service game fails. Literally everyone. They close server after server. Break promise after promise and dont deliver on half the shit they talked about. Just at a chance at that fortnite type money. Pathetic, they have to know nobody wants this shit. They have to know, it would be impossibke for them not to know.
live services based of single player projects can work as long as there a standalone expansion of an already existing complete single player package. gta 5 literally laid out the clear groundwork of how you do this thing you make an amazing full content single player experience and then use that map, gameplay, assests to then make a multiplayer live service experience for people to keep stay around for if they want to. For example look at arkham knight Great single player game that rocksteady released now imagine if wb had just got Montreal to work on a arkham online mode that released the next year after knight it was canonically set after where they used the same Gotham map and playable characters from the base game but you have you and your friends play as robin, nightwing, catwoman and red hood in co-op together where you fight random crimes, and play co op tailored AR challenges and most wanted missions and tie up loose character and story threads together whilst ranking up a battle pass where you unlock some free and premium pass skins for those characters Would of saved Montreal wasting years on Gotham knights, people would of actually been receptive to it as bonus content probably more so then the short Arkham episodes we got. It doesn’t need to be one or the other you don’t need to sabotage your single player experience and force in live service elements you could literally just do both as separate modes and experiences on the same game
I hope this game is a monumental failure so that they decide to not follow this formula and go back to making games like the Arkham series. Considering the amount of superman Easter eggs in Arkham knight we should of just got a superman game / series.
Mark my word now. This one is gonna work. I got a good feeling about this one. They gotta know egregious monetization practices will just make it flop early
ya know the worst part about this game? its not the avengers style live service bs they're shoving down everyone's throats its the fact that THIS GAME will be the last time we will ever hear Kevin Conroy voice
This game does not have to be a live service multi-player game to work. It can totally be like a fighting game where you take control of different characters depending on the chapter. We've already seen that most gamers hate live service already, so why make a game based on the most hated genre right now? It doesn't make any sense financially or otherwise.
It just looks like if ubisoft got fortnite,destiny 2 and sunset overdrive and made it into one game but then also decided to use unreal engine 4 so then we also get a side order of shader compilation stutter, traversal stutter and poor cpu optimisation and a reliance on upscaling
I don't care what anybody says I'm still getting this game for the story and the boss fights I want to know exactly how we going to kill the Justice League or are we going to fail a lot of people needs to take a chill pill the game hasn't even come out yet positivity people come on and if it's bad it's just bad it's not the end of the world you feel like you don't want to buy the game just don't buy the damn game
I am getting this game for the story & for Kevin Conroy's final performance as batman however i have reservations with this game in regards to the live service elements plus the gameplay doesn't look great. Plus its silly that a character like Captain Boomerang who is famous for using Boomerangs as weapons is mainly using guns in this game 😅
I like how you mentioned Guardians of the galaxy... which was a single player game... that released after that shit fest marvel Avengers. That game did poorly due to avangers and any game after suicide squad will do poorly as well
I can ALREADY tell that this game is gonna flop and don't be surprised when the executives at WB *Cough* David Zaslav *Cough* see the game flopping and wonder "uh why is this game flopping, it should be loved and played by everyone, I think it's the gamers fault for not buying it" or some BS like that, No David we didn't buy it because it's not what we wanted and we don't want future DC games like Wonder Woman to be all live service, be better WB.
I got an idea for a good rocksteady video game. How about a detective Gordon action game similar to the detective Gordon in the Gotham series that used to come on Fox. As he gets older, his daughter Oracle should be a part of his solo game to.
The game is going to be crazy. I don’t think that this is going to be the best game for next year. In addition, we have waited for this game for such a long time.
The always online of this game Will broake this shit,honestly this game should be a rougelike game,i dont hate this style but after Gears 5 and avengers i dont want this game to be this type of experience
They could easily remove battle pass mtx and always online requirements. That made the much much better and also the only way m. We aid multiple times we don’t want mtx battle pass paywalls dlc in out games
They dropped a new release date with every trailer first it was supposed to come out in 2022 then 2023 and now 2024 tf you doing I mean it's good that the developers take their time with the game but if you drop a new release date with every new trailer it just pisses you of
Can’t lie the story elements make me interested and even the traversel look fun, but shooting at members of the justice league just seems uninteresting, this game looks like it wants to be Fortnite 🤦🏽♂️
Man it looks like DC ain't going to get back on his feet because they lost in movies and it looks like it's going to be in games too man DC needs to get out of Warner Bros looks like it's going to be another victory for Marvel Spider-Man is already a hit and pretty soon Wolverine
The story has me interested. It looks fun, funny, energetic and thrilling. But the gameplay looks kinda basic. Especially the combat. My problem is would it feel incredibly repetitive after a while. Anyway if it is online only, it's a hell nah from me. Doesn't matter how good the story is. It's rocksteady so I have hope but let's see.
I’m not a fan of live service games and battle passes but it’s obvious WB been losing a lot of money especially lately with that being said how do ya expect them to fund us free dlcs if they’re not recouping and getting the money out from the battle passes, if ppls are worried about spending 7.99 every other month or so are worried about the wrong thing, stop feeding ur time into gaming and worry about actually working atp
WB is quickly becoming the new EA and Activision. Why tf are they not listening. LIke.. Sefton Hill left Rocksteady during this game's development and he was the father of the Arkham series. Him leaving Rocksteady is probably due to his frustration of WB
DAMN YOU DAVID ZASLAV!!! What do you think about the Suicide Squad game & all future WB games being live-service experiences? Let me know all of your thoughts and be sure to like, share, comment, and subscribe! Thank you all so much for watching!
I don't why they changed the race deathshot
I actually don't mind it and think the gameplay looks good along with amazing movement mechanics. If they play this cards right than it could be a pretty decent live service game.
WB is making EA look good like this.
@@MatthewK122 cus hes black in the movies jimbob
Well it's a good thing I like DC and Marvel so until DC get their s*** together I'm going to side with Marvel and their characters and Spider-Man is already a hit and it's going to be a matter of time before Wolverine be next.
This is the game we're getting after waiting almost a decade for a new game from rocksteady
Well done WB
With this news I’m now really concerned for the Wonder Woman game
Yep especially after the rumor today that Wonder woman may be another live service game.
I had no idea someone managed to get a Wonder Woman game in production 😂
@@iraford5788 Is it too much to ask for a good DC game? 😢
@@savageone22guss Batman do not count.
Funny we still haven’t gotten a Superman game the city looks like it was supposed to be a Superman game but the were told to change it
It still drives me crazy that we don’t have a rocksteady Superman game because personally for me a Superman game under rocksteady flying around metropolis using his powers would’ve been really awesome and tons of fun in my opinion.
And we where so close too. UUGGG! DC needs to get out of Warner Bros
@@thedarkknightman6150 indeed this sucks because a rocksteady game with Superman as the main protagonist could’ve been amazing in my opinion.
@@TevyaSmolka me too.
@@TevyaSmolka and he's my second favorite DC character right behind Batman
@@thedarkknightman6150 same here as well and honestly if there’s one character who deserves there own game it would be Superman, especially seeing Superman Clark Kent Lois lane and my boy Jonathan Samuel Kent superboy as his little 10 year old self being a family in a video game would be freaking fantastic in my opinion.
If this game is going to flop big time which I'm betting it's already going to do, I'm going to blame this all on David Zaslav!
Same, especially since this game will be the very last time we'll hear the late Kevin Conroy's Batman in anything really. Sheer goddamn arrogance and hubris.
It's not his fault but ok bud 😂 whatever floats your boat I guess
@@Tedi652I don't think you watched the video entirely 4:43
@@M64brosI did. I know what he said. It's not his personal decision. It's an entire board of execs and investors who want to do what Bungie did. Build a on the surface live service system and than sell for a profit and get out of the video game industry which is losing everyone money atm with costs of making games being ridiculous. So WB wants out. They've wanted out for a while now, and they're long term plan is to sell their studio and let someone else deal with game making whilst they'd get royalties of course because they own the properties still. Does that suck for consumers who would like to see good SP DC games? Absolutely. But that's more a reflection on the state of the gaming market atm than on David personally. You can blame him if you want though, never said anyone can't.
@@Tedi652 I get what you're talking about and I get what you mean, however and regardless, I still have faith in this game and I really don't want it to get screwed up from the get-go, It might a tiny bit but hopefully it should get some positivity by the time it releases.
WHY ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH IS THIS NOT AN OPEN WORLD JUSTICE LEAGUE GAME?!?!
Cause Fortnite pew, pew, pew.
That's what I'm saying
Because that would make sense. 😅
When WBs president said hes going to be foucusing on live service games for the future of their gaming division, I lost all hope for any future games from them. RIP WB games.
I am really sad..
A company that discriminates against people. The company that sells this game. It is "Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League - Deluxe Edition" and its sale is not allowed in my country. Guys, what kind of platform is this? What does it mean to distinguish people? Game is a means of entertainment. Why did you restrict children's access to games? I've seen companies go bankrupt. and I've seen companies rising. Those who rise are those who serve without discriminating against anyone. By doing this, by separating people, their name gradually disappears. Give up this wrong practice. Putting obstacles in the world's children and the game world will not gain you anything, it will only make you lose..
Also when I learned that the game was not good and not worth buying. I said, "I'm glad I didn't buy this game." My only regret is that, as a human being, the sale of this game has been blocked in my country, which makes me feel very bad. Imagine that you can buy games on a platform. When you want to buy this game, it says that the game is not available for sale in your country. Imagine if such a situation happened to you. Even though I have no bad intentions, I'm just an innocent game enthusiast. Isn't this unfair?
Atleast we got marvel to turn to.
WB Games just gave me all the good reasons to skip EVERYTHING they are going to make in the future. This just shows how lacking their research skills are. How come Marvel's Avengers, the Suicide Squad gameplay feedback and Spider-Man franchise destroying records weren't enough for them to acknowledge nobody wants live-service superhero garbage? Single player has ALWAYS been better than multiplayer.
The last good Batman game was Arkham Knight and the TRUE last good DC game in general was Injustice 2.
Well, we are most certainly going to get an Injustice 3, at least.
@@GoodbutevilgeniusWhich will be turned into a live service type game lmao.
@@Goodbutevilgenius wonder woman??
But if all else fails we got marvel.
Well. At least we had Spiderman 2😂
And soon Batman Arkham Trilogy for the switch to take with you I cannot wait
@@thedarkknightman6150 indeed!
WB is already in talks of turning Hogwarts Legacy into a live-service game for the sequel. The game is already being eyed down, as I’ve heard & being considered with that attempting approach. They are their own downfall, such a greedy company. I hope people wake up, and put their foot down that this isn’t what majority of us gamers want in these games.
That intro 😂. I am definitely interested in the story, since it’s set in the Arkhamverse (Arkham City is in my top 5 games of all time) and Harley and Deadshot look fun to play but it’s everything else I am concerned about. The live service and that Rocksteady have made their open world lifeless once again, with no civilians, only Brainiac’s goons. Plus, the fact that it’s online only, even if you play solo with AI bots for your companions, is stupid.
For me the worst part is that the movement and shooting actually looks pretty fun. If this were a 10-15 hour linear single player game it’s probably be good. But the fact they’re forcing in an open world, multiplayer, battle passes, loot that only serves to grind, a billion different currencies, and constant updates to keeps you playing for hundreds of hours kills any chance of that.
I actually thought the recent presentation focusing on the story and gameplay actually was quite good but it's disappointing to see a full open world metropolis that isnt focused on being a Superman game I don't want to kill the justice league I want to play as them
Way I heard it, the developers themselves wanted to actually make a Superman videogame. But WB rejected the idea.
@@gunstrokethecybertronian8659well that's frustrating
Dc games used to be good now they have gone downhill. Their last great game was I think it's Injustice 2. But seriously they used to beat Marvel in ganing now Marvel is beating them. Gotham Knights was atrocious and this seems like it will be even worse.
Marvel's Spider Man 2 > all DC live service games
If this game flops (in which it is showing signs that it might) it’s gonna hurt since it’ll be last time we will hear Kevin Conroy’s Batman.
Its not just gonna hurt its gonna cut deep
We want something like the Guardians of the Galaxy game.
it's truly unfortunate to see such a beautiful series fall victim to corporate, live-service shenanigans
In the quest to over monetize a game they are going to shoot themselves in the foot, it’s looking like Marvels Avengers all over, but worse because this time they “should” know it’s a bad idea
Now now, I'm sure this game'll be GREAT! I mean... the Avengers was a live service game and people lvoed that... right? right? umm.... ohh wait
@@briandavion right lol maybe I’m the only one that checked out halfway through the game 🤷🏽♂️ 😂 never touched a dlc luckily didn’t experience how trash their version of Spidey was 🙏
And not to mention, Marvels Avengers at least had melee combat the characters were more true to their origins than what they are doing with suicide squad 🤦🏽♂️
@@jordanmichael6263 yeah, TBH avenegrs end game online stuff was boring and grindy but the game play wasn't bad, had they not forced a live service aspect and just kept the campaign as the thing people proably woulda had mostly positive things to say about the game.
It really is a shame because DC has so much potential to make bangers with a lot characters in the roster they could make games for besides just Batman, we could've got a rocksteady Superman game after the Arkham series but instead WB makes them work on a live service suicide squad game nobody asked for. They could've learned from Spider-man 2 or their own game released this year called Hogwarts legacy but it looks like WB doesn't want good money. 🤷♂
They will learn soon when these games fail
You dont tell a world champion in ping pong to change racket sport and start playing tennis because its more money to earn.
This is what greedy WB did. They only saw the money that " could be made" out of a live service game and not if the developers had knowleadge to do it.
I hope it will bite WB in the ass and i think it will.
8 years of development cant be cheap and i dont think it will sell very well or that people play it for long or that sold cosmetica will earn them more than if they had sold millions more copies of a great single player experince.
Feel so bad for rocksteady this isn't something they ever wanted to do. This easily could've been a justice league or shit even a superman game but they choose the freakin suicide squad 😂
It's Warner Bros and DC company needs to get out of there
Dude, I love the the Persona 5 music in the background
8:55 Crafting, stamina bars, vision for food isn't what makes an RPG game an RPG game.
This games traversal looks good but the combat looks terrible, the opposite of the avengers.
Whoever decided to make this game over a new superman game or a justiceleague game should be fired.
Also how are they teasing ivy , isnt she dead??
Just saw that Remedy is remaking the 1st 2 Max Payne games and that made me so hyped for that, not this
For me I'm hype for the Arkham Trilogy for the Nintendo switch where I can take it with me anywhere
I cannot believe we will have gotten 3 crappy looter/shooter superhero games in the last 3 years. First it was Avengers, then Gotham Knights, and now Suicide Squad. Why do they keep trying this??? The two genres clearly don’t mix
Guardians of the galaxy was a looter shooter 🤷♂️ and it was good. Problem is nobody gave it a chance at first after avengers, not until it was too late and the game did bad financially and it’s why we don’t have a sequel
@@morris01 it was great. I don’t think it qualifies as a looter shooter though. Looter shooters almost always involve a gear-based progression system (which I hate with every fiber of my being) which Guardians didn’t have. Looter shooters can have good combat, it’s just that Avengers and (somewhat)Gotham Knights had really bad and repetitive combat. It was such a chore to progress through both of those games because of how grindy the progression was, and how unrewarding the combat felt. Guardians was awesome all around though. Hopefully Suicide Squad will follow in its footsteps
A very wait and see experience. I think the game will be decent gameplay wise. The worst that can happen is being too heavy on the shooting looter aspect.
If you view the pre order items it says in the most expensive edition you get a battle pass token with it.
The reason games like this exist is honestly something you have to blame the modern gamer for. I know company's are the easy ones to blame, (and yea I completely agree) but I can't put 100% fault on the company's or devs. It's the success of games like Fortnite, PUBG,etc that bring in the large bucks over time. When there was a boom for single player offline games, some gamers took that for granted, while other just couldn't be satisfied with what they got... always craving more and asking the devs to provide the content for free or paid dlc. Unfortunately devs are people to and they need to eat too, so when they came up with live service games to provide everything gamers wanted... people still complained. I get it I want a good Rockstedy game too, but until the consumers truly change and understand the true value of what they want and not buy into Major games like fortnite, 2k etc. This is what we'll get, so that they can bring home the bread, and satisfy the people that thus game targets..
Sorry for the long rant, but this problem is on both sides.
Barely any melee combat I wanted to see more of it but it’s literally a looter shooter
I think the biggest problem for people with these games is the story almost always suffers the game play loop is always repetitive and not fun after a couple hours that being said I think this one has a chance to fix those things just maybe
i just want dc games to be as good marvel games is that to much to ask
Well good thing I like both and until DC get their s*** together I'm going to side with Marvel for now and Spider-Man it's already a hit what's the matter of time before Wolverine
Dc games are better than marvel games lmao marvel just have Spider-Man going for them rn lol
Dammit I was excited for Wonder Woman but they are ruining it with live service
Maybe they think we’re stupid, and we’d assume that a delay meant they made changes that’ll make us want to buy it again.
It’s sad that they’d make a Suicide Squad game before they make a Superman or Flash game. Why play them when you can k!Ll them.
"We want to nickle and dime our fans" -David Zaslav
I will play this game no matter what, I love all the settings and design.
I wonder why they don’t give the 4 player co-op games a buy 1 get 1 deal, the biggest appeal is that you get together with 3 of you friends as the suicide squad and kill the justice league, if I were to buy the game, my friend would automatically get it as well because we are game sharing but then only two out of four of us get to play the game, so if they were to give a code to give to my friend, he would get the game for free and our other friend that he game shares with will too. It would be the best way to bring in people in my opinion. Because I know I won’t get the game if my friends don’t get it, so it will really encourage people to spend 70 dollars for it. Does this make sense chat or would they lose money doing this?
It Takes Two did it so you could experience the game with your friend, why can’t they start doing this with more co-op games that are more than 2 players ya know??
With this way all 4 of us could play the game but we don’t all have to spend tons of money to actually play it. I mean come on. Do they really expect 4 people to spend 70$ each to play together, everyone’s situation is different but this is the type of game that SHOULD be played with all of your friends.
WB learned nothing from Gotham Knights. Know your audience. DC gamers just want a new single player game that plays like the Arkham games. People already hate games as a Service as it is, but I think there going to be surprised just how much Arkham fans hate it.
Learned nothing from the failure of Gotham Knights & Avengers.
Learned nothing from the success of the Arkham & Spider-Man games.
It’s concerning how out of touch WB is.
The only reason I'm getting this game next year is the story, open world, cutscenes, graphics, and character designs. I'm not going to buy any mirotransations but if there are story dlcs or new characters I'll buy.
That’s a good attitude.
I ain't giving WB jack. Live service = fail.
They should have created new dc game universe not in Arkhamverse
I’m getting this game cause it looks fun to play with my friends
Graphically it looks good
Traversal looks fun
Story looks good
And Kevin Conroy… period
I don’t mind the shooter aspect but I would’ve definitely preferred something else. Only thing that really bugs me is always online… I have great internet but the fact that when they are done with this game you’ll never be able to play ever again even if you love it. That’s really sad and dumb for me.
Wait, where does it say you can’t restart the game?
@@scottdrotos8525 You can restart it but if the decide to stop the servers let’s say 10 years down the line you won’t be able to play ever again
I ain't giving WB a dime of my hard earned money for some live service trash.
@@ereyes6718 Good for you
Unlike you I have money to spend and friends to enjoy the game with… wouldn’t have gotten it otherwise 😂
@@ID0XX I have money to spend, just ain't spending it on live service trash. Got better games to buy FF7 Rebirth, Wolverine, Elden Ring DLC, etc, etc. I will be playing quality games while yoi have fun doing chores with those trash battlepasses.
A Steven king horror game is something I might be interested in
This reminds me of the "greed is good" quote. I hope it tanks hard so that other publishers stop trying to force these kinds of games on gamers only for them to die in agony. The future of gaming seems bleek if publishers keep focusing on game design that tries to maximize profit over enjoyment. RIP Rocksteady
They hung themselves when they didnt remove the always onine garbaage
I love Rocksteady but we shouldn’t support this game at all, this is a wake up call to everyone who still believes in storytelling/singleplayer games, wb needs to learn people won’t support their garbage pressured projects 😅
The world looked so bland in the first trailers I saw, now it looks gorgeous. Its very important to have visual great environments to traverse in these open world games. Traversal looks very good and I combat looks ok for a shooter. This game is defiantly 100% going to be and do better than Gotham Knight . Might get it but I dont do ministrations, so would treat it as a single player. If I have to pay to beat the game I wouldn't get it
You do realize they didn't change a single thing right 😂😂
@JustAG3mini looks better, but night probably still looks bland like in Spider Man 2
@@zerobob8586 what are you talking about you gotta be blind spiderman 2 was not bland maybe the ps4 spiderman but not 2
@JustAG3mini I could be fooled like gotham nights, but it's cool that you can shoot swinging from the grappling hooks with Harley Quinn. I mean it's a shooter so that different. There seems to be melee finishes like in Spiderman. But in the Arkham Knight the combat is so much better, more animations
I am super worried with Wonder Woman game now thanks to stupid david zaslave nonsense logic with his terrible live service logic which isn’t going to work in my opinion.
wb can you not be yourself for 5 minutes, FOR 5 Minutes!!!!
I’m honestly really excited for this game even tho I’m probably the only one
Nope, I’m also incredibly hyped for this game. I really don’t care what Filarca or anyone says. I’m hyped!
Will there be an offline mode too? If I don’t have friends who will play it I don’t want to play it with a rando
It's more like Destiny than it is Avengers
Great video Evan keep it up.
Honestly it's an improvement from last year's game reveal
We’re in the weirdest timeline, I swear. Physical media is slowly phasing out and game companies are quadrupling down on live-service games. Sheesh.
Superman would’ve been perfect for the Arkhamverse not this dead horse 🥲
I’m hoping the game doesn’t flop.
Guy named Captain Boomarang - Rocksteady give him a gun
Harley quinn who's iconic item is a bat or huge mallet - Rocksteady give her a gun
A mutated man into a shark - Rocksteady give him a gun
😅 So yeah strip away all their unique traits from the comics and give them guns gotcha! No thanks Rocksteady you are
no longer getting my money.
It’s one of those things that they just keep trying to push. I say boycott the whole thing because it worked with Shadow of War and if ppl stay strong, it will work with this too. They will also push it very hard to get sales because this insider vid proves it. Spider-Man didn’t have one. It’s a disappointment, for me. I think if anyone is interested will lose money.
I think If they made it were you play as the justice league instead people would like the game more. Though in my opinion, everyone would be wanting to play probably either Superman or Batman but that be a fun co-op game.
0:12 wow you appeal to dc fans too
I think it’s time to subscribe
Suicide squad kills rocksteady
the best thing to do is not buy this or any other only live game, it worked for target and budlight
The Suicide game I don't like the whole live service thing but I will say not every superhero game has to be single-player this, single-player that, etc.
Its so crazy that every live service game fails. Literally everyone. They close server after server. Break promise after promise and dont deliver on half the shit they talked about. Just at a chance at that fortnite type money. Pathetic, they have to know nobody wants this shit. They have to know, it would be impossibke for them not to know.
Remove Zaslav as CEO.
live services based of single player projects can work as long as there a standalone expansion of an already existing complete single player package. gta 5 literally laid out the clear groundwork of how you do this thing you make an amazing full content single player experience and then use that map, gameplay, assests to then make a multiplayer live service experience for people to keep stay around for if they want to.
For example look at arkham knight Great single player game that rocksteady released now imagine if wb had just got Montreal to work on a arkham online mode that released the next year after knight it was canonically set after where they used the same Gotham map and playable characters from the base game but you have you and your friends play as robin, nightwing, catwoman and red hood in co-op together where you fight random crimes, and play co op tailored AR challenges and most wanted missions and tie up loose character and story threads together whilst ranking up a battle pass where you unlock some free and premium pass skins for those characters
Would of saved Montreal wasting years on Gotham knights, people would of actually been receptive to it as bonus content probably more so then the short Arkham episodes we got. It doesn’t need to be one or the other you don’t need to sabotage your single player experience and force in live service elements you could literally just do both as separate modes and experiences on the same game
I hope this game is a monumental failure so that they decide to not follow this formula and go back to making games like the Arkham series. Considering the amount of superman Easter eggs in Arkham knight we should of just got a superman game / series.
This game has to fail. WB can’t think this is the way to make games.
8:50 my favorite part of the video
Mark my word now. This one is gonna work. I got a good feeling about this one. They gotta know egregious monetization practices will just make it flop early
I agree. Already pre-ordered deluxe.
The thing is live service games CAN work as long as the monetization practices Rocksteady uses work as well
Good to see some fair and logical folks giving this a chance. Im gonna be ordering sometime soon too. Looks fun to me and the concept is dope
ya know the worst part about this game? its not the avengers style live service bs they're shoving down everyone's throats
its the fact that THIS GAME will be the last time we will ever hear Kevin Conroy voice
This game does not have to be a live service multi-player game to work. It can totally be like a fighting game where you take control of different characters depending on the chapter. We've already seen that most gamers hate live service already, so why make a game based on the most hated genre right now? It doesn't make any sense financially or otherwise.
It just looks like if ubisoft got fortnite,destiny 2 and sunset overdrive and made it into one game but then also decided to use unreal engine 4 so then we also get a side order of shader compilation stutter, traversal stutter and poor cpu optimisation and a reliance on upscaling
Welp guess I’m not buying any WB games!
I don't care what anybody says I'm still getting this game for the story and the boss fights I want to know exactly how we going to kill the Justice League or are we going to fail a lot of people needs to take a chill pill the game hasn't even come out yet positivity people come on and if it's bad it's just bad it's not the end of the world you feel like you don't want to buy the game just don't buy the damn game
This game makes no sense cause the suicide squad couldn't beat the justice league on a normal attempt to kill them so this game makes no sense
I am getting this game for the story & for Kevin Conroy's final performance as batman however i have reservations with this game in regards to the live service elements plus the gameplay doesn't look great. Plus its silly that a character like Captain Boomerang who is famous for using Boomerangs as weapons is mainly using guns in this game 😅
It’s a shame that most companies want to make live service titles and cash in on micro transactions instead of making a good game with a lot of care.
If insomniac announce wolverine is coming in 2024,they gonna make suicide squad to flopsquad kill rockstedy studio😂😂
I like how you mentioned Guardians of the galaxy... which was a single player game... that released after that shit fest marvel Avengers. That game did poorly due to avangers and any game after suicide squad will do poorly as well
I can ALREADY tell that this game is gonna flop and don't be surprised when the executives at WB *Cough* David Zaslav *Cough* see the game flopping and wonder "uh why is this game flopping, it should be loved and played by everyone, I think it's the gamers fault for not buying it" or some BS like that, No David we didn't buy it because it's not what we wanted and we don't want future DC games like Wonder Woman to be all live service, be better WB.
I got an idea for a good rocksteady video game. How about a detective Gordon action game similar to the detective Gordon in the Gotham series that used to come on Fox. As he gets older, his daughter Oracle should be a part of his solo game to.
interesting, but what's the genre
The game is going to be crazy. I don’t think that this is going to be the best game for next year. In addition, we have waited for this game for such a long time.
The always online of this game Will broake this shit,honestly this game should be a rougelike game,i dont hate this style but after Gears 5 and avengers i dont want this game to be this type of experience
I could tell a big difference in excitement between hearing you spidey fans and dc fans😂
melee attack look so simple. yes I said it. I'm still excited for this game tho. 🔥
They could easily remove battle pass mtx and always online requirements. That made the much much better and also the only way m. We aid multiple times we don’t want mtx battle pass paywalls dlc in out games
Arkham knight was m rated and yet didnt need abusive language.
Somebody said this looks like fortnite and I think I actually agree
They dropped a new release date with every trailer first it was supposed to come out in 2022 then 2023 and now 2024 tf you doing I mean it's good that the developers take their time with the game but if you drop a new release date with every new trailer it just pisses you of
Can’t lie the story elements make me interested and even the traversel look fun, but shooting at members of the justice league just seems uninteresting, this game looks like it wants to be Fortnite 🤦🏽♂️
Man it looks like DC ain't going to get back on his feet because they lost in movies and it looks like it's going to be in games too man DC needs to get out of Warner Bros looks like it's going to be another victory for Marvel Spider-Man is already a hit and pretty soon Wolverine
The story has me interested. It looks fun, funny, energetic and thrilling. But the gameplay looks kinda basic. Especially the combat. My problem is would it feel incredibly repetitive after a while. Anyway if it is online only, it's a hell nah from me. Doesn't matter how good the story is. It's rocksteady so I have hope but let's see.
This is a game that will be on gamepass 3 month after realese or sold dirt cheap.
I’m not a fan of live service games and battle passes but it’s obvious WB been losing a lot of money especially lately with that being said how do ya expect them to fund us free dlcs if they’re not recouping and getting the money out from the battle passes, if ppls are worried about spending 7.99 every other month or so are worried about the wrong thing, stop feeding ur time into gaming and worry about actually working atp
Just give me new Batman Arkham game on the current gen and I'll forgive you WB (if it's great like the previous games).
wb really wants my wallet to be nice and fat cause the money is staying inside it.
WB is quickly becoming the new EA and Activision. Why tf are they not listening. LIke.. Sefton Hill left Rocksteady during this game's development and he was the father of the Arkham series. Him leaving Rocksteady is probably due to his frustration of WB
The state of games are so pathetic 🙁 there is no more risk just a lot of playing it safe games 😒
GTA 6 single player is going to be loaded with micro transactions just like the online mode. I hope it fails.