Regarding the first mass, you said " if x1 >x2" and for the second mass you said "if x2>x1" , could you please explain why did you assume these two contradicting assumptions for the same system? Thank you.
7:18 Regarding the first mass, you said " if x1 >x2" and for the second mass you said "if x2>x1" , could you please explain why did you assume these two contradicting assumptions for the same system? Thank you.
They are assumed to be different in both the cases just for the sake of simplicity. You can stick to a single assumption for both the masses and will end up getting the same pair of equations of motion.
Best explanation on the beats. In a manner, I use expressions on Adobe After Effects, using the “wiggle expression” on AE to adjust the frequency and amplitude for given visual effects (47:45) Kudos!!
For the first mass, you considered x1 to be greater than x2 (at 5:18) And here (at 7:13) as for the second mass you considered x2 to be greater than x1!!! Why???? How can this even be possible at the same time? (Like Schrodinger's cat) 🤔🇧🇩
All this talk about SHM. Let's add some DAMPING :)
ua-cam.com/video/8AHQ6gBSxAU/v-deo.html
Tomorrow exam😂... anyone from NIT SILCHAR....
Bhai 😂😂 same
Aree Bhai main bhi😂
bhaisahab 🫡🫡
Bhai Bhai bhai😂
Bhai same😂😂
Regarding the first mass, you said " if x1 >x2" and for the second mass you said "if x2>x1" , could you please explain why did you assume these two contradicting assumptions for the same system? Thank you.
suppose x1>x2 while considering second mass, then the direction of force would be opposite (in this case rightwards). - k(x2 - x1)= + k (x1 - x2).
Sir, I am fan of your pronunciation♥️♥️
7:18 Regarding the first mass, you said " if x1 >x2" and for the second mass you said "if x2>x1" , could you please explain why did you assume these two contradicting assumptions for the same system? Thank you.
They are assumed to be different in both the cases just for the sake of simplicity. You can stick to a single assumption for both the masses and will end up getting the same pair of equations of motion.
When considering the change in length of the second spring, why is it (x1-x2) for the first mass and (x2-x1) for the second mass?
God level explanation....far better than IIT professor....❤
Sir just wow...watching b4 xm n8😅
Your explanation is just mind blowing 🔥🔥
Best explanation on the beats. In a manner, I use expressions on Adobe After Effects, using the “wiggle expression” on AE to adjust the frequency and amplitude for given visual effects (47:45)
Kudos!!
Ha bhai DU waale Kitne h..? 😃
Itna bekar kon pdata h 😢😢
Watching From IIT Kharagpur,,Anyone Here?
sir, pls include lagranges eq for coupled oscillator
wow , your explanation is just mind blowing ! thank you very much🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Please make a play list putting the vedios in order.
Your way of teaching is great.
For the first mass, you considered x1 to be greater than x2 (at 5:18)
And here (at 7:13) as for the second mass you considered x2 to be greater than x1!!! Why????
How can this even be possible at the same time? (Like Schrodinger's cat)
🤔🇧🇩
Thank you sir for this simple explanation
I'm 3rd year hons students
Thank you sir
sir how you explained this confused topic is very nice
Simple and crisp explanation. Thank you sir.
Thank you very much sir..keep up the good work
Thank you very much
extremely well presented in the simplest manner.. hats off to the efforts
extremely helpful topic🙏
Very informative! Thank you very much!
Amazing lecture❤
7:05 Force due to middlespring.. If we take it as x1-x2..is it right.. Like what u did in the case of fst mass
Sir are this lecture is from book nk bajaj wave and oscillation.
complete realization ho gya topic ka thank you sir
What if the entire system is being suspended vertically with both the ends being fixed and gravitational force also needs to be considered.
Sir pls put a video for linear tri-atomic molecule in classical mecanics
Amazing ❤🎉🎉
Amazing ❤🎉🎉
Great explanation Sir 😊🙏🙏
Hindi mein nahi hai😭
Which tools you used to teach!!
Please tell me!??
thanks very much!
thank you so much
Best video on this topic
Wonderful Explanation
Made us love Physics
Well explained
Amazing
tq sir
Maza ayae 👌
king
T
Ultimate sir
💖