I have been ignoring glaucoma for a longtime...as it's too difficult to understand from the book. Even videos are difficult n too descriptive. Finally I came across your video. What to say...I'm so grateful to you. Finally understood this tough topic in just 1hour. Thanks a lot maam❤🙏🙏🙏
May nee some correction.. at 11.40 level, you are talking about disc. But you are marking at cup. Either i an wrong or you are wrongly describing. Any way your deliberations are excellent... Keep it up ❤. Dr. Shekhar Yashwant Paranjpe
The cupping theory was mistakenly introduced in the 1850s. One hundred years later, instead of confirming the cupping theory, we introduced a cup-to-disc ratio parameter which inferred that the original (birth) cups begin enlarging as the disease progresses. However, the original cups of various sizes from 0.00 to 0.9 are actually the central meniscus of Kuhnt (fibrous remnants of Bergmeister’s papilla) which lie superficially on the nerve fiber layer of the disc, and have no relevance to glaucoma. The lamina cribrosa appears to be sinking in primary open-angle glaucoma resulting in the peripheral-to-central axotomy of nerve fibers at the scleral edge.
Hi, we always call "PAILLOMACULAR FIBRES". Actually, it should be called as maculopapullary fibres. It denotes direction of fibres. Same holds true about NASOLACRIMAL DUCT. Actually, it should be lacrimonasal duct. 😮😊
![[UA] NAVI проти G2 Esports | Blast Premier Fall Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QWlIm4FGESQ/mqdefault.jpg)
A deep brief description of glaucoma in simple language. Tks a lot mam. 🙏
Good morning mam...big big thank you from the bottom of my heart ♥ 🙏
Thanks
I have been ignoring glaucoma for a longtime...as it's too difficult to understand from the book. Even videos are difficult n too descriptive. Finally I came across your video. What to say...I'm so grateful to you. Finally understood this tough topic in just 1hour. Thanks a lot maam❤🙏🙏🙏
Thats wonderful 👍 glad it helped you @adrita😊!
Salute to you mam
You've just killed my ignorance in glaucoma, could relate to the terms but after your video i have full confidence
Ma'am can u name the book reference u are using???
Thank you very much for this informative and excellent video.
You are welcome 😄
Perfect
Thank you
May nee some correction.. at 11.40 level, you are talking about disc. But you are marking at cup. Either i an wrong or you are wrongly describing. Any way your deliberations are excellent... Keep it up ❤. Dr. Shekhar Yashwant Paranjpe
Mam for rim disc ratio we take rim diameter or rim width
It's the rim width divided by the diameter of the disc
Maam very much informative , outstanding, concepts got clear.
Thank you for your classes 🙏
Glad you like them!
The cupping theory was mistakenly introduced in the 1850s. One hundred years later, instead of confirming the cupping theory, we introduced a cup-to-disc ratio parameter which inferred that the original (birth) cups begin enlarging as the disease progresses. However, the original cups of various sizes from 0.00 to 0.9 are actually the central meniscus of Kuhnt (fibrous remnants of Bergmeister’s papilla) which lie superficially on the nerve fiber layer of the disc, and have no relevance to glaucoma. The lamina cribrosa appears to be sinking in primary open-angle glaucoma resulting in the peripheral-to-central axotomy of nerve fibers at the scleral edge.
Thanks for sharing :)
amazing elaboration on seemingly difficult subject
thank you
Thank you ma'am
This video simplifies the topic so much
Waaaoow I'm amazed!
Thanks a bunch
Mam one eye vision lost affected by glaucoma... is it curable? Possible to get visoin again???
No
During fundoscopy examination, unusually found temporal pallor, is it a normal finding?
Yes we often encounter that ..and it's not normal...there are a lot of causes of temporal pallor
Hi, we always call "PAILLOMACULAR FIBRES". Actually, it should be called as maculopapullary fibres. It denotes direction of fibres. Same holds true about NASOLACRIMAL DUCT. Actually, it should be lacrimonasal duct. 😮😊
True😂
Your concepts are crystal clear . Helped a lot ❤
Rhe way you have taught this is excellent..
After somedays you will get the award of the best teacher ❤️
That's really sweet of you
Just outstanding
Killed it.... amazing..... GOD level lecture mam.... Thanku very much... ❤❤
Thank you ! Glad you liked it 😊
Thank u Ma'am. Pls how do u record an absent cup? Is it as 0.0 or as No cup? Am confused.
I prefer calling it as obliterated cup
Very Informative , enjoyed throughly !
Thank you 😊
Thank you mam
Goood❤
You are great ❤❤
Thanks a bunch! You're awesome too.
You are great...the best ❤❤
Thank you 😊
All your videos are really easy to understand! Thank you👍
🎉❤
Very good information
Nice
Excellent
Outstanding
So confusing