The defunding of federal education is going to raise our state, county and local taxes. It’s not saving us money. The school voucher program drives the private schools tuition higher and ppl in lower and middle income can’t afford that increase. Schools are going to close and that creates overcrowding and poor performance in the remaining schools.
You caring that the same amount of money is coming out of your paycheck but not recognizing that your ability to control how and where that money is spent shows how absolutely vapid your worldview is.
Well considering many schools don’t have funding cause the federal government refuses and withholds funding based on test scores ,this will make sure poor schools get more funding so ofc it’ll cost more and most school funding comes from state and local taxes anyways
@@abelflores1593 That’s where the problem lies. School choice is funded by taxpayers, above and beyond what they are already paying for public schools and other public works. So, even if we send our kids to public schools, school choice vouchers cost us even more for exclusionary schools. Most, nearly all, private schools do NOT have fully funded SpEd programming, TAs for the kids with disabilities, well-funded arts programs, or even transportation to the schools (school buses). Some may have a couple of those, or if they are in wealthy districts, might replicate most of those programs, but they do not allow profoundly disabled kids, ED students. And, they do not have decent pay for teachers and ancillary staff. I know , because I have worked in assorted private and public schools. Public schools are for all citizens.
Private schools are also a problem because they aren’t covered by government regulations. In other words they can teach what they want and more importantly accept who they want.
What a joke-I was a special education teacher when the IDEA started. Here’s the dirty secret-school districts have NEVER been fully funded as IDEA promised.
So that falls on the States not the Department of Education. They are the ones that request funding. So either the school, district, the county, or the state was mk or doing their part in getting the correct resources and funding. we never had an issue getting funding for the schools my kids were in, in Florida or North Carolina.
If the DOE is eliminated what will happen to IDEA and the funding tied to it?!? That’s the question people should be asking. Special education is expensive and costs many public districts anywhere from 25-40 percent of their M and O budget. Many special education teaches are very worried how this will impact our careers and the students we serve
Life goes on. Doe is 40 years old. Are people saying we did have Education prior. Different parts would take bake control of what they did do 40 years ago. Is anyone saying the doe is doing a good job
Many of these comments are missing the point that everyone who is getting a college degree, master's degree, going for a doctorate, or in law or medical school may be unable to finish those degrees because FA is determined through Dept. of Ed even if loans are distributed by private companies. DOE does not just manage K-12 education but does a lot to manage educational initiatives at multiple levels. It will be terrible. Education has a lot of challenges, but eliminating the DOE will certainly create more problems than solving them.
Yes, you are correct. However, this will affect K-12 greatly. Trump stopped giving public schools any funding last time he was in office. Only Private and Charter schools received the funding. He wants ALL school students to pay tuition. No more free education. Just think……now a student will have that debt their WHOLE life, not just in adulthood.
Student aid is the main cause of the problem it tries to cure. A 2017 study from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that the average tuition increase associated with expansion of student loans is as much as 60 cents per dollar. That is, more federal aid to students enables colleges to raise tuition more. Salaries rise
@@analogia_entis no one is denying that. There are more layers to this than just to say it’s DOE fault. One of the main things is States have reduced spending in these sectors as they know DOE will foot the bill.
The same way they afford public schools. Most states have vouchers so parents can choose to put their kids in public or private school and the schools gets paid through the state voucher. So they would make it universal. So parents can choose what school best fits their child.
@dustin2269 they don't afford or pay for public schools. And my state of NC just siphoned over $200 million from public schools to try to force children into private schools. There is no way poor people can afford private schools on their own without state support.
@@dustin2269 Vouchers don't give most families enough money to attend the private secular or religious school of their choice. Additionally, vouchers are given to affluent families who don't need and shouldn't be allowed to have them. And, in some states, vouchers can be used for purchases rather than for school admission. Private schools are $30K+ annually and that's probably low balling it. Most families aren't getting that kind of money. Even with a voucher, they won't be able to afford private school. It's a scam.
Ya know, if We the People cut the paychecks of ALL politicians in Washington DC, we would have more than enough money to run the country. Who's with me on this?
It's a funny idea but they do deserve to get paid 😂 Now, do they deserve all they get? Do they deserve lifelong pensions? Those are questions that could be debated. One thing I DO feel though is that they should not be able to vote to give themselves raises. I don't know the way to handle that or what the solution should be, but voting for your own raise? When do they ever say no?😂
It sounds to me like if you live in a poorer district the schools would suck, the disabled kids wouldn't be able to attend school, and public school would no longer be free for kids to attend. Might even go the way of colleges--it was free to attend college once upon a time. Now it's quickly becoming something only wealthy people can afford. Seems like the rich folks who fund the Republicans maybe don't want poor people to have any education at all, or only very little.
Odd how Putin took the crimea under Obama and Biden's noses, then behaved under Trump, and now are pounding the rest of the ukraine under Biden and Harris. Maybe Admiral Levine will come to the rescue? He still has two months!
@@imperialmotoring3789There was more focus and funding to support the HUMANITIES. (Arts, Music, Literature, History) These subjects INCREASE IQ IN CHILDREN. These subjects improve CRITICAL THINKING and DISCERNMENT SKILLS. And…in 1979, children were NOT being “groomed” by computer and phone screens to BE PASSIVE RECIPIENTS! Kids were engaged in social play, and the outdoors, etc. I’m an educator. I’ve seen the myriad research. We know HOW to deliver a “quality” education. The fact, the tragedy, is that fewer and fewer students in the United States receive a “quality” education. Republicans have systematically DE-FUNDED EDUCATION FOR DECADES! Why? Because it is FAR EASIER TO CONTROL AN UNDER-EDUCATED POPULACE. This a serious matter.
Each generation gets dumber and dumber bc companies knew it would be the accumulative effect of dumping!!! There is even documention in WRITING showing companies KNEW the effects of dumping byproducts and what environmental impact it would have!!! These kids are legit getting ret@rded from pollution and each generation, it will continue to snowball. And, nobody wants to admit this because we all are just money hungry and more focused on the money....
The Pacific Northwestern, Northeastern (New England areas), and Utah schools will be fine. Public schools everywhere else will take a major hit... upper-middle-class areas will churn out less educated students, and students in districts with high poverty levels won't get the support they need. Our public school system is currently crap, but demolishing the DOE isn't the answer. Overhauling it is. States' Rights via public education will create a worse situation (which we've seen historically) than we currently have.
I'm a devoted sub, it's not like we aren't trying. Our relationship with technology has allowed our social skills to deteriorate, but there's a lot of other "moving parts" besides
Say goodbye to middle and lower class people going to college as there will be no more federal student loans. Private loans are horrible-most don’t offer forbearance while in school; if forbearance is offered, interest still accrues while you’re in school and then is added to the balance when you are done; if you’re having hard times, there’s no changing of your monthly payment until you can get a better job. This means that doctors, lawyers, anybody that needs a PhD or a masters degree, are all gonna have to be upper class people?
Here’s one thing I haven’t seen anything though on. The Dept of Education funds public kids broadcasting like Sesame Street ,Arthur and other learning shows on PBS kids off a grant from the dept. if it’s gone. What will happen to things under “Ready to Learn” grant? Will it just all be brain rot Cocomelon and skibi toilet?
Anyone whose kid has an IEP or college student wanting a Pell Grant hopefully knew this before voting, but I fear there will be some difficult surprises.
It will. We already have high school graduates (substitute teachers) teaching high school. In some places drop outs can be substitutes for the entire school year bc it’s just that bad finding someone educated enough to teach. The dumb teaching the dummies smh. No one is majoring in education anymore. None of these people even understand how the brain works for learning or can pass a urine test bc they’re all high on substance.
I was responsible for disability compliance on several college campuses, and can say that, without the Office of Civil Rights, there would be horrible disability discrimination in colleges and universities (think disabled vets). College professors often are “against” disability accommodations and college administrators often agree. One college admissions director actually asked me how to prevent students with disabilities from being accepted. Without the enforcement of the OCR, this would be commonplace.
Irony is that every employee of the DOE probably makes more money that most of the teachers in this country. What if we took the DOE Budget, gave it to states to pay teachers more money.
And be replaced with what??? The reason that education is free is because traditionally it was only for the aristocracy. Many revolutions were fought to get these freedoms but it sounds like you are probably wealthy so you don't care or you're working class and simply deluded because most private and charter schools don't want kids with special needs. They cost a lot to teach and cater to their needs. That is why public schools get more money for that population. Not enough by any means but at least a poor or working class family can get their child educated. So again... it all comes down to money and guess who will fall behind?! 🤔
@agravery223 you really are a lost little child without your precious government aren't you? The state legislatures might actually have to balance their budgets and properly spend the money. I've personally seen how school systems waste money in some areas and complain of short falls in others. Upon investigation the unnecessary spending was money ear marked by the Fed.
@@agravery223 half your comment is making assumptions about me that's absolutely hilarious. I'm someone who has watched these systems waste money for decades. Why? Because there's money in X budget for it. 1 dollar to the Fed doesn't equal 1 dollar on the local level. The money is being spent on office expenses, sweet payroll and benefits for bureaucrats that could have, or do have state level counterparts and surprisingly enough aren't all that necessary to public education. They exist only because the system is too big.
No. The No Child Left Behind Act, passed in 2002 by Republicans, wrecked the system, as we warned that it would. And, was intended by the Republican Party…
I know ONE thing. If the DOE were abolished, they wouldn't take money from well performing districts like MINE and give it to failing districts in the state made up mostly of minorities where they squander the money on administrative salaries, perks like cars for the superintendent and vacations disguised as workshops. While those districts continue to fail and the drop out rate is still high.
I teach in a well performing district where the superintendent makes a breathtaking $300k, plus perks. What is your point? What needs to happen is cutting administrative bloat from all districts across the country. It’s disgraceful that districts give CEO salaries to admin while I have to buy my own pens & pencils IN A WELL PERFORMING SCHOOL.
@@ronswansonsdog2833 What is my point? You say you teach in a well performing district. If your district's board of education chooses to give your superintendent that kind of a salary and the voting taxpayers are okay with it, so be it. However, how much of that salary is supported by both federal and state aid? If you are in a well performing district, you should get very little aid if any at all. In MY state, the bulk of the aid goes to poor performing districts where the money is supposed to be pumped into education but is instead squandered by the administration. Let me tell you a little story. In my state there is a city who's schools are known for underperformance and a high drop out rate. The state and the federal government for years kept pumping money into it but to no avail. Over 20 years ago, it was discovered that the superintendent had TWO chauffer driven limousines. The state legislature tried to cut back the money and the district took them to court. The state won and money WAS in fact cut back. When the superintendent whined and cried to the judge, the judges exact words were 'well, I guess you're going to have to learn to get by on just ONE chauffer driven limousine.' I DO agree with you about administrative salaries though. It's gotten WAY out of control in so many districts. While good teachers like yourself buy supplies for their students with their own money. Where change needs to begin is with the elected boards of education. It needs to be a cooperative effort across the states. Because if one district cuts a superintendents salary, they just leave and go to one which pays them more. I hate to say it, but unions are another problem, at least in MY state. They just want more and more and more. They seem to forget that the taxpayers who pay for those stipends and perks don't make as much as some teachers and in some cases, the higher property taxes takes food out of their kids mouths.
Money from the Department of Education isn’t “taken away” from one district and given to another. If that is happening, your state or local school district is doing that. Federal money from the Department is given based on head count (about $1,000 per student). There are also federal competitive grants given to programs that can demonstrate the most need. Anything that is going on in your state that is not on the up-and-up is not at the federal level.
Since it's inception... the average test scores have fallen, like clock work, across every single matrices!!! Not to mention, the entire educational industry has gone completely insane with the hiring of activists... not educators!!!
That my friend is a social issue. Parents that dont discipline their children and dont instill the value of education. So you parents have failed society. The kids dont care about getting educated, they dont see the value of it and whose fault is that ?
Well, you're obviously among the less well-educated, especially considering you don't know the difference between it's and its, plural versus singular, and the correct use of an ellipsis. You know nothing about education or the federal Department of Education. But as you're a Trumper, I am not at all surprised.
Dive into the effectiveness of those tests in determining true growth in learning. And don’t skip the part about Pearson. I agree that there must be periodic assessments, but instead of a series of formative assessments to help us really pinpoint growth and areas of weakness that we can then try to fix before the summarize assessment. Unfortunately core teachers can’t do that AND teach to the test. There is literally not south time in the day. We’ve seen examples from the ACT, for instance. That’s the only one I absolutely crushed many moons ago, and I’d forgotten how exhausting it is. The passages you have to read alone are mind numbingly dry, some of them are truly at college level. The benchmarks and expected growth pacing are possibly accurate for very advanced students, but not for your average high schooler with a job, an after school activity, and whatever problems are happening at home (hey, we all have problems at home). No Child Left Behind was the rise of the testing industry and the massive profits those people make. I mean I voted for him in 2004 (I was only 18 and didn’t know any better). I bear some blame, too. But that was the real turning point. The pandemic has also caused a major disruption that we’re still seeing. In fact the kids now entering high school are some of the ones that were most impacted. We’ve spent 4 years frantically playing catch up. I’m even having to teach to the test in art by having them do written assignments and build endurance by reading long and unnecessarily boring passages on art history. There are SO many ways to make those topics fascinating. None of which they’ll encounter on tests. Kind of a bummer to have to use art time for that. As for activists, not sure where that’s coming from. I don’t have any colleagues doubling as activists, except for the one that’s all about the animals. Nothing crazy, no PETA protests. Just pretty adamant about their views on hunting and eating meat. 🤷🏻♀️. Most of us are trying to do our jobs for which we are highly qualified. And most of us have masters degrees in the field. I have a BA in art, a BFA concentrating in drawing and printmaking (that is a studio arts degree), and a masters in K-12 art education. I’m too tired and too broke to “activate” 😂. We’re also having to pick up parenting gaps in many cases. That includes mandated reporting, relationship building, academic support, passing out food, hygiene products, and cloths for those that can’t afford it, helping with emotional regulation and how to navigate the world, working sports games (out of contract hours), showing up to events, extra tutoring… Whatever your issues are, those of us that are trying to stick it out are awesome. I’m patting us on the back for the effort we’re putting into our craft. Sure, bad, lazy, and/or crazy teachers are out there. Pretty much all of us had at least one of those as a kid. But most are giving 100%
That my friend is a social issue. Parents that dont discipline their children and dont instill the value of education. So you parents have failed society. The kids dont care about getting educated, they dont see the value of it and whose fault is that ?
That my friend is a social issue. Parents that dont discipline their children and dont instill the value of education. So you parents have failed society. The kids dont care about getting educated, they dont see the value of it and whose fault is that ?
Trump & all his cabinet picks tells me the circus is back in town.....gunna do what I did last time....make a lot of money off of their stupidity & sit back with my bowl of popcorn & watch the sh*t show 💙☮️🙏🇺🇸🤪
Just the fact that they fund all the programs for students with disabilities for each state and make sure those programs are going properely is enough reason to have them. You should really look up what the DOE does before making such a statement because it is nothing what you seem to think it is.
@@debikeeney We should do what other countries do and fund the students not the schools. In other words the money should follow the student regardless of the school they go to.
@@norbertamberg8730 which other countries specifically? Better question is, you ready to fork over billions more in taxes just to get more buses to get kids across town twice a day so their parents can work to afford the higher tuition costs from private schools? And rural America can't afford the time or money to do that, so they'll just not have schools anymore. This isn't going to work, red states will fall further behind and their degrees won't even be valid in blue states who don't teach the Bible as historical fact.
You’re absolutely right. It does fall on the states. People think that the federal government fully funds special education. It does not. Send all the money used for the D.O.E. back to the states. It would be better used for the students.
@ education is by and large determined on the state and local level.. hence all the variations state to state, but I wouldn’t expect a knuckle dragging Trump supporter to understand.
@@garrett7101 first thanks for the name calling "how old are you" i said 52 billion would go to the states instead of a do nothing Department !!! you actual just made my point ! thank you
For those who don't seem to know this, we had public schools (operating at a level far above where they are now) LONG before we had the Department Of Education. As a matter of fact, I went through grade school AND high school before the DOE existed, and I can read, do math without a calculator, find any country on a map, READ a map, and can successfully tell the difference between a man and a woman.
@painkillerjones6232 Yeah you're right, providing kids with disabilities with the same equal opportunity to educate doesn't benefit anyone. Providing grants to under privilege kids does help anyone. Providing school meals to kids at school does help them. Providing resources and funding to schools and under privilege kids and areas does improve education at all. 🙄 Just remember if trump cuts the Department of Education and the funding for these programs it will fall on the states. So don't complain once your taxes increase.
@painkillerjones6232 And Schools, districts, counties, and states were not abiding by them. Title 1 was created in 65 and kids were still left without educational opportunities. Can we say Segregation. IDEA was created in 75 and kids with disabilities were still not able to get access to schools and education. The Department of Education was created to make sure these programs and funding was ACTUALLY distributed. It also made sure that schools are not violating kids Civil Rights to get an education. As much as you want to pretend that minorities, under privilege people and people with disabilities weren't discriminated against actual history shows you why these laws were passed. So again just get ready for your taxes to majorly increase under trump. Someone has to pay to keep these programs and funding going.
Can't eliminate it fast enough....I have taught college since for 2016 and every year the students are worse. Why do we call the first 8 years (8 YEARS) Grammar School and my class doesn't know what adverbs or participles or Genitives are. An indirect object is a mystery of mystieries.
I grew up without the department and went to public school. I went to an inner city school. The schools functioned better then than now. Schools were about learning not about woke crap.
Considering how nationwide test score have steadily gone down to pathetic levels since the DOE was invented, I'd say getting rid of it can only improve things. Anytime you get the government involved in something, it ends up worse off, while spending record amounts of money to destroy whatever it was they came to "fix" 😊
@primuskuhl no they just spread around the money to teacher unions and other left wing groups that have gutted the ability to actually educate children and not indoctrinate them.
Without that department, I'm sure it would just be up to states and cities to oversee their educational systems. It's easier to adjust to individual needs when you aren't getting the same rubber stamp systems that don't apply or help you and your school. The responsibilities would have to be absorbed, which would cause confusion at first, but more than likely, it would create new jobs in the local areas as more people would need to assume those responsibilities.
States already over see their schools and their curriculums. The Department of Education over see fund for children with disabilities, food for chips, Grants, programs for under privilege children, and assistance with Civil Rights protection. If they get rid of the Department of Education, you first better hope States will enact something to protect those rights for and then get ready because your taxes are going to go up so they are able to keep those assistance's available. Because you know for a fact the federal government is not going to give you a refund on the taxes that covered the Department of Education.
@tristanrouse6150 totally, I got a Pell grant from them to go to school for a while. But the state college I went to had a lot of different scholarships and grants available and only 1 was offered by the department of education.
The State and Local Governments would Take control of the schools Like it did many years ago and get rid of the Bloat of The Dept of Education Bureaucracy
Look at all the Cabinet level departments and why they are needed. Department of State because only the Federal government can negotiate with other countries and issue passports. Department of Defense because only the Federal Government can raise the military. Treasury because only the federal government can print money. DOJ because only the federal government can enforce federal laws, but should be cut back and restrained. Most Departments do things only the federal government can do, so why the Department of Education. There is nothing in the Constitution saying the Federal government has power over education. It was a payback for the NEA endorsing Jimmy Carter. All the DOE does is create layers of paperwork for schools and enforce stupid laws. Example, a school built a new gym but could not put urinals in the boys locker rooms because that was unfair to girls who could not use urinals in their bathrooms, that was a DOE mandate. I think there are more departments that could be ended or collapsed into other departments.
FIRST thing 2nd+3rd world countries do TO ELEVATE THEMSELVES ISHAVE A STRONG NATIONAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT:post kindergarten classes ARE TAUGHT IN ENGLISH :)
The commentary touched on (just briefly) one aspect involved in where this issue may be headed on a fairly "generalized" basis when the statement was made that they think that trump will be "more" "supportive" of a move toward charter schools ; BUT with "the Fed" not having been playing much of a role in shaping primary education to begin with and a supposed preference to policy which leaves such matters to be considered and managed by the States ; what is that influence going to look like , AND without a national Dept. of Education managing those "efforts" how is it that "support" rendered is going to occur in a form which amounts to equal representation in and between every State ????
I just think kids should be worried about math and reading instead of what is on social media and gender take away the tablets us 80 s and 90s kids grew up watching reading rainbow sesame street barney and Cartoon Network and pbs thirteen we didnt have facebook or tik tok or UA-cam and we are fine
That my friend is a social issue. Parents that dont discipline their children and dont instill the value of education. So you parents have failed society. The kids dont care about getting educated, they dont see the value of it and whose fault is that ?
It also means red states degrees will be worthless outside of red states in a couple years, you'll have to go through remedial classes just to catch up to blue states if you try to flee a red state.
That my friend is a social issue. Parents that dont discipline their children and dont instill the value of education. So you parents have failed society. The kids dont care about getting educated, they dont see the value of it and whose fault is that ?
Do you know this for a fact? Have you thought about actually going to your local elementary school and talking to the kindergarten teachers about what is actually read to them in class and by whom? Have you thought of volunteering your OWN time to read to them books that are good and clean and wholesome that you want to read to them. If you're so concerned about what kindergarteners are being read and who is doing the reading, then put your money where your own mouth is, get off your duff and go read to them!
I'm shocked at how many people support this without our nation even having a plan without it!!! Like wtf... there isn't anything to replace it! Just oh. We'll leave it to the wind to figure it all out... Somehow, the kids will be educated... somehow! 🙄 Yeah ok... just like how these companies police themselves!!! 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
@@randallwinters7387 It benefits children with disabilities. It benefits children of poor families. It provides funding for grants. It defend childrens Civil Rights. The Department of Education doesn't create curriculums for schools or test.
Unfortunately, that's what they did with the abortion issue as well. Nothing was thought out, just "let the States decide" and now we have women dying when their own bodies are naturally aborting the fetuses. For shame!
The defunding of federal education is going to raise our state, county and local taxes. It’s not saving us money.
The school voucher program drives the private schools tuition higher and ppl in lower and middle income can’t afford that increase. Schools are going to close and that creates overcrowding and poor performance in the remaining schools.
You caring that the same amount of money is coming out of your paycheck but not recognizing that your ability to control how and where that money is spent shows how absolutely vapid your worldview is.
Well considering many schools don’t have funding cause the federal government refuses and withholds funding based on test scores ,this will make sure poor schools get more funding so ofc it’ll cost more and most school funding comes from state and local taxes anyways
School choice means poor kids won’t go to school.
It's called private school pay your own way
We've heard this nonsense for decades. But all that's happened is that US standards keep dropping and dropping.
@@abelflores1593 That’s where the problem lies. School choice is funded by taxpayers, above and beyond what they are already paying for public schools and other public works. So, even if we send our kids to public schools, school choice vouchers cost us even more for exclusionary schools. Most, nearly all, private schools do NOT have fully funded SpEd programming, TAs for the kids with disabilities, well-funded arts programs, or even transportation to the schools (school buses). Some may have a couple of those, or if they are in wealthy districts, might replicate most of those programs, but they do not allow profoundly disabled kids, ED students. And, they do not have decent pay for teachers and ancillary staff. I know , because I have worked in assorted private and public schools. Public schools are for all citizens.
Private schools are also a problem because they aren’t covered by government regulations. In other words they can teach what they want and more importantly accept who they want.
@@jormungaurd You are correct!
What a joke-I was a special education teacher when the IDEA started. Here’s the dirty secret-school districts have NEVER been fully funded as IDEA promised.
So that falls on the States not the Department of Education. They are the ones that request funding. So either the school, district, the county, or the state was mk or doing their part in getting the correct resources and funding. we never had an issue getting funding for the schools my kids were in, in Florida or North Carolina.
THey take your money , lop off a chunk, send some back to the state, and want you to say "gee, thanks!"
Why send it to them in the first place ??
If the DOE is eliminated what will happen to IDEA and the funding tied to it?!? That’s the question people should be asking. Special education is expensive and costs many public districts anywhere from 25-40 percent of their M and O budget.
Many special education teaches are very worried how this will impact our careers and the students we serve
The state and local agencies can fund that we need to get rid of that bloated system
States would have more money to allocate to special needs when they don’t need to pay billion in DC overhead.
@@LechnerFamily are you Imagining that we would stop paying taxes for Education? 😂😂😂😂 delulu
@@paulettelamontagne6992 And where would state and local agencies get the money from?
Life goes on. Doe is 40 years old. Are people saying we did have Education prior. Different parts would take bake control of what they did do 40 years ago.
Is anyone saying the doe is doing a good job
Abolish the department but keep the money…. This is a money grab
They wanna attach the money to the students
tHiS iS,a MoNeY gRaB!!
@@claudeyazmagical thinking isn't thinking
Musk at his finest!!
it's called draining the swamp 🤣
Many of these comments are missing the point that everyone who is getting a college degree, master's degree, going for a doctorate, or in law or medical school may be unable to finish those degrees because FA is determined through Dept. of Ed even if loans are distributed by private companies. DOE does not just manage K-12 education but does a lot to manage educational initiatives at multiple levels. It will be terrible. Education has a lot of challenges, but eliminating the DOE will certainly create more problems than solving them.
Yes, you are correct. However, this will affect K-12 greatly. Trump stopped giving public schools any funding last time he was in office. Only Private and Charter schools received the funding. He wants ALL school students to pay tuition. No more free education. Just think……now a student will have that debt their WHOLE life, not just in adulthood.
I think I should start my masters while I still can. Would you agree?
Student aid is the main cause of the problem it tries to cure.
A 2017 study from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that the average tuition increase associated with expansion of student loans is as much as 60 cents per dollar. That is, more federal aid to students enables colleges to raise tuition more. Salaries rise
@@analogia_entis no one is denying that. There are more layers to this than just to say it’s DOE fault.
One of the main things is States have reduced spending in these sectors as they know DOE will foot the bill.
How are poor and disabled people supposed to afford private school tuition? In addition to medical expenses, living expenses, etc.?
The same way they afford public schools. Most states have vouchers so parents can choose to put their kids in public or private school and the schools gets paid through the state voucher. So they would make it universal. So parents can choose what school best fits their child.
@dustin2269 they don't afford or pay for public schools.
And my state of NC just siphoned over $200 million from public schools to try to force children into private schools.
There is no way poor people can afford private schools on their own without state support.
Exactly!
Schools in the United States spend an average of $19,973 per pupil.
@@dustin2269 Vouchers don't give most families enough money to attend the private secular or religious school of their choice. Additionally, vouchers are given to affluent families who don't need and shouldn't be allowed to have them. And, in some states, vouchers can be used for purchases rather than for school admission. Private schools are $30K+ annually and that's probably low balling it. Most families aren't getting that kind of money. Even with a voucher, they won't be able to afford private school. It's a scam.
Ya know, if We the People cut the paychecks of ALL politicians in Washington DC, we would have more than enough money to run the country. Who's with me on this?
It's a funny idea but they do deserve to get paid 😂 Now, do they deserve all they get? Do they deserve lifelong pensions? Those are questions that could be debated. One thing I DO feel though is that they should not be able to vote to give themselves raises. I don't know the way to handle that or what the solution should be, but voting for your own raise? When do they ever say no?😂
@@mriccardi825
Do they deserve to be paid if they are working to demolish our working social government?
Yup! But let's be careful; without the DOE, our kids might not learn enough about dinosaurs 😂
@@mriccardi825I think these self-important elementary school teachers are about to learn how the other half lives.
It sounds to me like if you live in a poorer district the schools would suck, the disabled kids wouldn't be able to attend school, and public school would no longer be free for kids to attend. Might even go the way of colleges--it was free to attend college once upon a time. Now it's quickly becoming something only wealthy people can afford. Seems like the rich folks who fund the Republicans maybe don't want poor people to have any education at all, or only very little.
Make people stupid again.
Again? They are already stupid. The Department is Education is an utter failure. Facts.
2008-2016 kind of stupid!
it would free up 52 billion , for 40 straight years our kids are getting lower scorses , so they FAILED
Too late.
@@copyprint-fz2hb The Department of Education does not create the curriculums for the schools.
Guess he could always start up Trump University again since it was such a great success...
Putin is no fool. He knows Trump is.
Odd how Putin took the crimea under Obama and Biden's noses, then behaved under Trump, and now are pounding the rest of the ukraine under Biden and Harris. Maybe Admiral Levine will come to the rescue? He still has two months!
Is Putin responsible for the kids bathrooms issue, or is that straight up Democrats bad?
@@francismarion6400 More on, Seen Nile? Read Tarred?
@leannevandekew1996 So who is the fool in that scenario?
@@francismarion6400 You and Trump.
Trump and the word "education" do not belong in the same sentence. He probably can't even spell it.
Z
I once had a consultant working for me who said "Each generation gets dumber and dumber." Now it will definitely be possible. LOL.
How were people educated before 1979? And why were grades much higher back then?
And yet the older generations are smarter with an 8th grade education than our current crop of college graduates.
@@imperialmotoring3789There was more focus and funding to support the HUMANITIES. (Arts, Music, Literature, History)
These subjects INCREASE IQ IN CHILDREN.
These subjects improve CRITICAL THINKING and DISCERNMENT SKILLS.
And…in 1979, children were NOT being “groomed” by computer and phone screens to BE PASSIVE RECIPIENTS! Kids were engaged in social play, and the outdoors, etc.
I’m an educator. I’ve seen the myriad research. We know HOW to deliver a “quality” education.
The fact, the tragedy, is that fewer and fewer students in the United States receive a “quality” education. Republicans have systematically DE-FUNDED EDUCATION FOR DECADES! Why? Because it is FAR EASIER TO CONTROL AN UNDER-EDUCATED POPULACE.
This a serious matter.
Each generation gets dumber and dumber bc companies knew it would be the accumulative effect of dumping!!! There is even documention in WRITING showing companies KNEW the effects of dumping byproducts and what environmental impact it would have!!!
These kids are legit getting ret@rded from pollution and each generation, it will continue to snowball.
And, nobody wants to admit this because we all are just money hungry and more focused on the money....
Proving that evolution does go in reverse .
The Pacific Northwestern, Northeastern (New England areas), and Utah schools will be fine. Public schools everywhere else will take a major hit... upper-middle-class areas will churn out less educated students, and students in districts with high poverty levels won't get the support they need. Our public school system is currently crap, but demolishing the DOE isn't the answer. Overhauling it is. States' Rights via public education will create a worse situation (which we've seen historically) than we currently have.
And, perhaps overhauls will be coming. Right now, our kids are being cheated.
I wish kids would learn to be nice people in school.
@@JohnMacFergus-oz5cp It'll never happen. We learned about abuse and self defense at a young age.
Why don't they learn this at home ?
Schools aren't there to parent your kids for you. Teach them to be good humans at home.
@llamalover02 I taught mine. It's those other kids. you know. The one's that bullied you in school.
I'm a devoted sub, it's not like we aren't trying. Our relationship with technology has allowed our social skills to deteriorate, but there's a lot of other "moving parts" besides
This is what REAL news is supposed to look like.
Say goodbye to middle and lower class people going to college as there will be no more federal student loans. Private loans are horrible-most don’t offer forbearance while in school; if forbearance is offered, interest still accrues while you’re in school and then is added to the balance when you are done; if you’re having hard times, there’s no changing of your monthly payment until you can get a better job. This means that doctors, lawyers, anybody that needs a PhD or a masters degree, are all gonna have to be upper class people?
*upper class people.
Here’s one thing I haven’t seen anything though on. The Dept of Education funds public kids broadcasting like Sesame Street ,Arthur and other learning shows on PBS kids off a grant from the dept. if it’s gone. What will happen to things under “Ready to Learn” grant? Will it just all be brain rot Cocomelon and skibi toilet?
Sasame Street lmao. Dang.
Well maybe we will evolve and start hiring AI tutors or something.
Anyone whose kid has an IEP or college student wanting a Pell Grant hopefully knew this before voting, but I fear there will be some difficult surprises.
Also, college students with disabilities who need accommodations will be discriminated against admissions and in classes.
Did you hear about Trump suffering from scurvy in college? The best he could do was a C minus.
Liberals have no sense of humor
L.O.L.
I don’t get it can someone explain
@@Black_Caucus More on, Seen Nile? Read Tarred?
@ does scurvy make you bad at school or something or am I just as dumb as Donnie and don’t get the joke 😓
Trump himself said in a speech regarding closing the Department , “The poor states will suffer.”
One thing will be certain, public education in America will not get any worse because that is impossible.
Never say never,
It will. We already have high school graduates (substitute teachers) teaching high school. In some places drop outs can be substitutes for the entire school year bc it’s just that bad finding someone educated enough to teach. The dumb teaching the dummies smh. No one is majoring in education anymore. None of these people even understand how the brain works for learning or can pass a urine test bc they’re all high on substance.
I was responsible for disability compliance on several college campuses, and can say that, without the Office of Civil Rights, there would be horrible disability discrimination in colleges and universities (think disabled vets). College professors often are “against” disability accommodations and college administrators often agree. One college admissions director actually asked me how to prevent students with disabilities from being accepted. Without the enforcement of the OCR, this would be commonplace.
Irony is that every employee of the DOE probably makes more money that most of the teachers in this country. What if we took the DOE Budget, gave it to states to pay teachers more money.
The problem is that in 20 years someone will say the reverse because states will do the same thing
Quality of education has been on steady decline since they were founded. It's a failed system, time for it to go.
And be replaced with what???
The reason that education is free is because traditionally it was only for the aristocracy. Many revolutions were fought to get these freedoms but it sounds like you are probably wealthy so you don't care or you're working class and simply deluded because most private and charter schools don't want kids with special needs. They cost a lot to teach and cater to their needs. That is why public schools get more money for that population. Not enough by any means but at least a poor or working class family can get their child educated.
So again... it all comes down to money and guess who will fall behind?! 🤔
@agravery223 you really are a lost little child without your precious government aren't you? The state legislatures might actually have to balance their budgets and properly spend the money. I've personally seen how school systems waste money in some areas and complain of short falls in others. Upon investigation the unnecessary spending was money ear marked by the Fed.
@@agravery223 half your comment is making assumptions about me that's absolutely hilarious. I'm someone who has watched these systems waste money for decades. Why? Because there's money in X budget for it. 1 dollar to the Fed doesn't equal 1 dollar on the local level. The money is being spent on office expenses, sweet payroll and benefits for bureaucrats that could have, or do have state level counterparts and surprisingly enough aren't all that necessary to public education. They exist only because the system is too big.
No. The No Child Left Behind Act, passed in 2002 by Republicans, wrecked the system, as we warned that it would. And, was intended by the Republican Party…
There would be more funding going to schools because you cut out a middle man.
"Deportation had huge ripple effects on education." She didn't answer the question. What are the ripple effects specifically?
Trauma and upended living conditions for many students.
I know ONE thing. If the DOE were abolished, they wouldn't take money from well performing districts like MINE and give it to failing districts in the state made up mostly of minorities where they squander the money on administrative salaries, perks like cars for the superintendent and vacations disguised as workshops. While those districts continue to fail and the drop out rate is still high.
Agreed!!!!
I teach in a well performing district where the superintendent makes a breathtaking $300k, plus perks. What is your point? What needs to happen is cutting administrative bloat from all districts across the country. It’s disgraceful that districts give CEO salaries to admin while I have to buy my own pens & pencils IN A WELL PERFORMING SCHOOL.
@@ronswansonsdog2833 What is my point? You say you teach in a well performing district. If your district's board of education chooses to give your superintendent that kind of a salary and the voting taxpayers are okay with it, so be it. However, how much of that salary is supported by both federal and state aid? If you are in a well performing district, you should get very little aid if any at all. In MY state, the bulk of the aid goes to poor performing districts where the money is supposed to be pumped into education but is instead squandered by the administration.
Let me tell you a little story. In my state there is a city who's schools are known for underperformance and a high drop out rate. The state and the federal government for years kept pumping money into it but to no avail. Over 20 years ago, it was discovered that the superintendent had TWO chauffer driven limousines. The state legislature tried to cut back the money and the district took them to court. The state won and money WAS in fact cut back. When the superintendent whined and cried to the judge, the judges exact words were 'well, I guess you're going to have to learn to get by on just ONE chauffer driven limousine.'
I DO agree with you about administrative salaries though. It's gotten WAY out of control in so many districts. While good teachers like yourself buy supplies for their students with their own money. Where change needs to begin is with the elected boards of education. It needs to be a cooperative effort across the states. Because if one district cuts a superintendents salary, they just leave and go to one which pays them more. I hate to say it, but unions are another problem, at least in MY state. They just want more and more and more. They seem to forget that the taxpayers who pay for those stipends and perks don't make as much as some teachers and in some cases, the higher property taxes takes food out of their kids mouths.
@@painkillerjones6232 👍
Money from the Department of Education isn’t “taken away” from one district and given to another. If that is happening, your state or local school district is doing that. Federal money from the Department is given based on head count (about $1,000 per student). There are also federal competitive grants given to programs that can demonstrate the most need. Anything that is going on in your state that is not on the up-and-up is not at the federal level.
School choice only sounds like a good idea. It’s much more complicated than it sounds with many unintended consequences.
Since it's inception... the average test scores have fallen, like clock work, across every single matrices!!!
Not to mention, the entire educational industry has gone completely insane with the hiring of activists... not educators!!!
It's from pollution, not the system.... smdh.
That my friend is a social issue. Parents that dont discipline their children and dont instill the value of education. So you parents have failed society. The kids dont care about getting educated, they dont see the value of it and whose fault is that ?
Well, you're obviously among the less well-educated, especially considering you don't know the difference between it's and its, plural versus singular, and the correct use of an ellipsis. You know nothing about education or the federal Department of Education. But as you're a Trumper, I am not at all surprised.
Dive into the effectiveness of those tests in determining true growth in learning. And don’t skip the part about Pearson. I agree that there must be periodic assessments, but instead of a series of formative assessments to help us really pinpoint growth and areas of weakness that we can then try to fix before the summarize assessment. Unfortunately core teachers can’t do that AND teach to the test. There is literally not south time in the day.
We’ve seen examples from the ACT, for instance. That’s the only one I absolutely crushed many moons ago, and I’d forgotten how exhausting it is. The passages you have to read alone are mind numbingly dry, some of them are truly at college level. The benchmarks and expected growth pacing are possibly accurate for very advanced students, but not for your average high schooler with a job, an after school activity, and whatever problems are happening at home (hey, we all have problems at home). No Child Left Behind was the rise of the testing industry and the massive profits those people make. I mean I voted for him in 2004 (I was only 18 and didn’t know any better). I bear some blame, too. But that was the real turning point.
The pandemic has also caused a major disruption that we’re still seeing. In fact the kids now entering high school are some of the ones that were most impacted. We’ve spent 4 years frantically playing catch up. I’m even having to teach to the test in art by having them do written assignments and build endurance by reading long and unnecessarily boring passages on art history. There are SO many ways to make those topics fascinating. None of which they’ll encounter on tests. Kind of a bummer to have to use art time for that.
As for activists, not sure where that’s coming from. I don’t have any colleagues doubling as activists, except for the one that’s all about the animals. Nothing crazy, no PETA protests. Just pretty adamant about their views on hunting and eating meat. 🤷🏻♀️. Most of us are trying to do our jobs for which we are highly qualified. And most of us have masters degrees in the field. I have a BA in art, a BFA concentrating in drawing and printmaking (that is a studio arts degree), and a masters in K-12 art education. I’m too tired and too broke to “activate” 😂.
We’re also having to pick up parenting gaps in many cases. That includes mandated reporting, relationship building, academic support, passing out food, hygiene products, and cloths for those that can’t afford it, helping with emotional regulation and how to navigate the world, working sports games (out of contract hours), showing up to events, extra tutoring…
Whatever your issues are, those of us that are trying to stick it out are awesome. I’m patting us on the back for the effort we’re putting into our craft. Sure, bad, lazy, and/or crazy teachers are out there. Pretty much all of us had at least one of those as a kid. But most are giving 100%
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2002, passed by Republicans, has destroyed education
it would free up 52 billion , for 40 straight years our kids are getting lower scorses , so they FAILED
That my friend is a social issue. Parents that dont discipline their children and dont instill the value of education. So you parents have failed society. The kids dont care about getting educated, they dont see the value of it and whose fault is that ?
@@dcs4219 sure in some casses
And send it straight to private contractors. America was not created to be a corporation, but it sure has become one.
Test scores have fallen ever since Education became federalized. Break it up. Let each state be responsiable for it's own kids.
That my friend is a social issue. Parents that dont discipline their children and dont instill the value of education. So you parents have failed society. The kids dont care about getting educated, they dont see the value of it and whose fault is that ?
Red states will suffer the most.
@@robbiesmith9820 whys that?
Trump & all his cabinet picks tells me the circus is back in town.....gunna do what I did last time....make a lot of money off of their stupidity & sit back with my bowl of popcorn & watch the sh*t show 💙☮️🙏🇺🇸🤪
How has the department of education been doing the last 20 years? Like trash.
So would you prefer some of the money going to religious schools instead?
Back at you if you are a parent what is your part in it? That is where people need to do some real critical thinking and self-examination.
Just the fact that they fund all the programs for students with disabilities for each state and make sure those programs are going properely is enough reason to have them. You should really look up what the DOE does before making such a statement because it is nothing what you seem to think it is.
@@debikeeney We should do what other countries do and fund the students not the schools. In other words the money should follow the student regardless of the school they go to.
@@norbertamberg8730 which other countries specifically? Better question is, you ready to fork over billions more in taxes just to get more buses to get kids across town twice a day so their parents can work to afford the higher tuition costs from private schools? And rural America can't afford the time or money to do that, so they'll just not have schools anymore.
This isn't going to work, red states will fall further behind and their degrees won't even be valid in blue states who don't teach the Bible as historical fact.
You’re absolutely right. It does fall on the states. People think that the federal government fully funds special education. It does not. Send all the money used for the D.O.E. back to the states. It would be better used for the students.
Reagan wanted the Dept. of Ed. shut down because it was President Carter,....no other reason
Our kids would learn cursive writing when they are abolished 😊
You do realize that States create school curriculum and not the federal department of education, right?
WTF do you think it means for education?
it would free up 52 billion , for 40 straight years our kids are getting lower scorses , so they FAILED
@ education is by and large determined on the state and local level.. hence all the variations state to state, but I wouldn’t expect a knuckle dragging Trump supporter to understand.
@@garrett7101 first thanks for the name calling "how old are you" i said 52 billion would go to the states instead of a do nothing Department !!! you actual just made my point ! thank you
@ more money isn’t going to help when you have idiots like Ryan Walters in charge of a state’s education.
For those who don't seem to know this, we had public schools (operating at a level far above where they are now) LONG before we had the Department Of Education. As a matter of fact, I went through grade school AND high school before the DOE existed, and I can read, do math without a calculator, find any country on a map, READ a map, and can successfully tell the difference between a man and a woman.
The Department of Education does not run the schools or create curriculums.
@@primuskuhl It's not in the business of improving the education of our youth, either.
@painkillerjones6232 Yeah you're right, providing kids with disabilities with the same equal opportunity to educate doesn't benefit anyone. Providing grants to under privilege kids does help anyone. Providing school meals to kids at school does help them. Providing resources and funding to schools and under privilege kids and areas does improve education at all. 🙄
Just remember if trump cuts the Department of Education and the funding for these programs it will fall on the states. So don't complain once your taxes increase.
@primuskuhl Those programs existed before the DOE did.
@painkillerjones6232 And Schools, districts, counties, and states were not abiding by them. Title 1 was created in 65 and kids were still left without educational opportunities. Can we say Segregation. IDEA was created in 75 and kids with disabilities were still not able to get access to schools and education. The Department of Education was created to make sure these programs and funding was ACTUALLY distributed. It also made sure that schools are not violating kids Civil Rights to get an education. As much as you want to pretend that minorities, under privilege people and people with disabilities weren't discriminated against actual history shows you why these laws were passed.
So again just get ready for your taxes to majorly increase under trump. Someone has to pay to keep these programs and funding going.
Can't eliminate it fast enough....I have taught college since for 2016 and every year the students are worse. Why do we call the first 8 years (8 YEARS) Grammar School and my class doesn't know what adverbs or participles or Genitives are. An indirect object is a mystery of mystieries.
I grew up without the department and went to public school. I went to an inner city school. The schools functioned better then than now. Schools were about learning not about woke crap.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Describe woke.
Your English teachers failed you.
Then than
Typical example of narrow perspectives. Not everyone has the same opportunities you had.
Why should taxpayers have to pay for private school
Why should my tax dollars pay for drop out factories?
Considering how nationwide test score have steadily gone down to pathetic levels since the DOE was invented, I'd say getting rid of it can only improve things.
Anytime you get the government involved in something, it ends up worse off, while spending record amounts of money to destroy whatever it was they came to "fix" 😊
The Department of Education does not create curriculum for schools or create tests.
@primuskuhl no they just spread around the money to teacher unions and other left wing groups that have gutted the ability to actually educate children and not indoctrinate them.
The levels have gone down bc these kids and all of us are being fed poison and its run-off in the environment
Good morning Esther, I’ll see you soon. Drive safe.
Without that department, I'm sure it would just be up to states and cities to oversee their educational systems. It's easier to adjust to individual needs when you aren't getting the same rubber stamp systems that don't apply or help you and your school. The responsibilities would have to be absorbed, which would cause confusion at first, but more than likely, it would create new jobs in the local areas as more people would need to assume those responsibilities.
States already over see their schools and their curriculums. The Department of Education over see fund for children with disabilities, food for chips, Grants, programs for under privilege children, and assistance with Civil Rights protection. If they get rid of the Department of Education, you first better hope States will enact something to protect those rights for and then get ready because your taxes are going to go up so they are able to keep those assistance's available. Because you know for a fact the federal government is not going to give you a refund on the taxes that covered the Department of Education.
What of the colleges?
@tristanrouse6150 totally, I got a Pell grant from them to go to school for a while. But the state college I went to had a lot of different scholarships and grants available and only 1 was offered by the department of education.
Trump's rhetoric compares to historic fascist language.
@@Chad_Max Trump never liked White Castle because he never understood chess.
How is Trump's rhetoric compared to Socialism (fascism). Do you have an example sir?
@@imperialmotoring3789 Socialism isn't fascism, Genius.
@@imperialmotoring3789 Not college educated, are you.
@@imperialmotoring3789 Are you in your first or second childhood.
IS IT REALLY ABOUT REDUCING THE DEBT ? CUZ THAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE !!!
The State and Local Governments would Take control of the schools Like it did many years ago and get rid of the Bloat of The Dept of Education Bureaucracy
You are forgetting that the department of education also handles stuff like the college system, and establishing education standards.
if they cant teach slow kids to catch up, and regular kids carpentry...its gotta go🤡💩
DOE is just a baybee beauty pageant🤢🤮
Very bad idea
This administration hasnt even started, so let's look at what is decided before people get hysterical.
Look at all the Cabinet level departments and why they are needed. Department of State because only the Federal government can negotiate with other countries and issue passports. Department of Defense because only the Federal Government can raise the military. Treasury because only the federal government can print money. DOJ because only the federal government can enforce federal laws, but should be cut back and restrained. Most Departments do things only the federal government can do, so why the Department of Education. There is nothing in the Constitution saying the Federal government has power over education. It was a payback for the NEA endorsing Jimmy Carter. All the DOE does is create layers of paperwork for schools and enforce stupid laws. Example, a school built a new gym but could not put urinals in the boys locker rooms because that was unfair to girls who could not use urinals in their bathrooms, that was a DOE mandate. I think there are more departments that could be ended or collapsed into other departments.
We just elected Trump, aren't we dumb enough?
Adding another 50 million illegals will help the public (government) schools and the working families that pay for them, right?
The Department Of Idiocation
FIRST thing 2nd+3rd world countries do TO ELEVATE THEMSELVES ISHAVE A STRONG NATIONAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT:post kindergarten classes ARE TAUGHT IN ENGLISH :)
What is that going to schools
Bullchit, that useless department would not be missed bunch of DEI and politicians kids
The commentary touched on (just briefly) one aspect involved in where this issue may be headed on a fairly "generalized" basis when the statement was made that they think that trump will be "more" "supportive" of a move toward charter schools ; BUT with "the Fed" not having been playing much of a role in shaping primary education to begin with and a supposed preference to policy which leaves such matters to be considered and managed by the States ; what is that influence going to look like , AND without a national Dept. of Education managing those "efforts" how is it that "support" rendered is going to occur in a form which amounts to equal representation in and between every State ????
I just think kids should be worried about math and reading instead of what is on social media and gender take away the tablets us 80 s and 90s kids grew up watching reading rainbow sesame street barney and Cartoon Network and pbs thirteen we didnt have facebook or tik tok or UA-cam and we are fine
Bla bla more bs from CBS she needs to be debated.
That my friend is a social issue. Parents that dont discipline their children and dont instill the value of education. So you parents have failed society. The kids dont care about getting educated, they dont see the value of it and whose fault is that ?
It means it goes back to the states and no more common core . Bout time !!! Trump !!!!!
It also means red states degrees will be worthless outside of red states in a couple years, you'll have to go through remedial classes just to catch up to blue states if you try to flee a red state.
Do you actually know what the DOE is? Or what it does?
@CatherineLee3000 the answer is no, the spam bots who deleted my similar reply do not care either.
Yep. Project 2025!
I wasted six minutes of my wife watching this.😒
I think you meant “life.” Not “wife.”
Democracies Segregated school systems across the US will become the normal.
It's not like the DOE actually does anything. Most kids can't read or write at a level 3 grades below their curret ones
That my friend is a social issue. Parents that dont discipline their children and dont instill the value of education. So you parents have failed society. The kids dont care about getting educated, they dont see the value of it and whose fault is that ?
Trump campaign slogan MAGA was from Mussolini:
Make Italy Great Again.
Pretty sure it’s from Reagan’s “Let’s make America Great Again”.
@@bigdima6945 Reagan stole it from Mussolini.
@@bigdima6945 A jpeg confuses you.
@@bigdima6945 "channel doesn't have any content". Describes you well.
@@bigdima6945 13 years, 3 subs: Take the hint, comrade.
the department of education been lame...If it does go away hopefully it gets replaced with something better
I think getting rid of it is great. Maybe no more dirty books and no more stories read by almost naked men. To kindergarteners. 😊
Oh yeah, like that is really happening.
Do you know this for a fact? Have you thought about actually going to your local elementary school and talking to the kindergarten teachers about what is actually read to them in class and by whom? Have you thought of volunteering your OWN time to read to them books that are good and clean and wholesome that you want to read to them. If you're so concerned about what kindergarteners are being read and who is doing the reading, then put your money where your own mouth is, get off your duff and go read to them!
Maybe do your research from actual reliable sources before posting.
I’m loving it that I voted for tr um p❤️🇺🇸
Let's see how you feel in about a year. 😂
@Chuck-js8dy, You like tariffs, eh? I highly doubt you even know what tariffs are. Don’t complain to me when prices skyrocket in the next four years.
lol gender identity I can’t.
I'm shocked at how many people support this without our nation even having a plan without it!!! Like wtf... there isn't anything to replace it!
Just oh. We'll leave it to the wind to figure it all out...
Somehow, the kids will be educated... somehow! 🙄
Yeah ok... just like how these companies police themselves!!! 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
@@randallwinters7387 It benefits children with disabilities. It benefits children of poor families. It provides funding for grants. It defend childrens Civil Rights.
The Department of Education doesn't create curriculums for schools or test.
Unfortunately, that's what they did with the abortion issue as well. Nothing was thought out, just "let the States decide" and now we have women dying when their own bodies are naturally aborting the fetuses. For shame!
Welcome to “America has decided”
Next episode: “Deal with it”
You have no idea what is going to happen to our country!
@@debikeeney it was pretty good 4 years ago !!!
@@debikeeney Why do you think you k ow better than me?
Bibles in every classroom Open Wide. children.
Admiral Levine will be the school nurse!
at least it's better than DEI woke crap