Look inside a Fury Movie Sherman TANK!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 270

  • @overvieweffect9034
    @overvieweffect9034 3 роки тому +148

    "not masses of room"- one of the roomiest tanks of WW2 by far

    • @ArmourgeddonTanks
      @ArmourgeddonTanks  3 роки тому +50

      Very true but still a squeeze when there are 5 guys inside

    • @haydenalvaro6276
      @haydenalvaro6276 3 роки тому

      i dont mean to be so off topic but does someone know of a way to get back into an Instagram account..?
      I somehow lost my account password. I love any assistance you can offer me.

    • @jerichojayce7904
      @jerichojayce7904 3 роки тому

      @Hayden Alvaro instablaster ;)

    • @haydenalvaro6276
      @haydenalvaro6276 3 роки тому

      @Jericho Jayce thanks for your reply. I found the site on google and I'm in the hacking process now.
      Looks like it's gonna take a while so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.

    • @haydenalvaro6276
      @haydenalvaro6276 3 роки тому

      @Jericho Jayce it did the trick and I actually got access to my account again. I'm so happy:D
      Thank you so much you saved my ass !

  • @johnkelly6942
    @johnkelly6942 Рік тому +9

    I knew a guy in my hometown who was an WW2 Army mechanic in Europe and one of his jobs was cleaning out damaged tanks brought back from the front. We can never forget the sacrifice was very real.

  • @johndoe-zk1yu
    @johndoe-zk1yu 4 роки тому +73

    thank you for saving history.

  • @robertwoods2505
    @robertwoods2505 3 роки тому +74

    Thank you Alex for sharing this. My father was a Tank Commander during the Battle of the Bulge and it very nice to see what he experienced. Liked and subscribed.

    • @ArmourgeddonTanks
      @ArmourgeddonTanks  3 роки тому +7

      Glad you enjoyed it!

    • @ssherrierable
      @ssherrierable 2 роки тому +1

      Sure he was, all of our dads were in that battle. My dad has hitlers real skull in our garage.

    • @bryanjames5256
      @bryanjames5256 2 роки тому +3

      Amazing. My grandfather was as well, and among some of the first to cross that river into Germany with Patton. Would say he had nightmares about those days. He wouldn't talk about it, but I could imagine.

    • @TheStephepps
      @TheStephepps 2 роки тому

      @@ssherrierable I'll bet he killed fitty Tojos to get it.🤣🤣

    • @ghostmourn
      @ghostmourn 2 роки тому

      @@ssherrierable Well most of our Dads or Grandparents were involved in the war, everyone was at the time. All hands on deck kind of thing I suppose. My Grandpa was in Iwo Jima. No skull but i grew up with a Samurai sword in the closet and a japanse grenade turned into a cigarette lighter.

  • @j.s.connolly8579
    @j.s.connolly8579 3 роки тому +15

    Later versions had actual small "Lights" that you could turn on when it was dark and the turret was motorized.

  • @jamesshantie1923
    @jamesshantie1923 3 роки тому +20

    That’s why the later tanks had a hatch for the loader as well.

  • @markbrandon7359
    @markbrandon7359 2 роки тому +9

    Two things #1 there came a point when the crew would scrape off the white stars as the German's used them for bullseyes and the hull star just happened to line up with an ammo storage bin
    #2 he mentioned small hatch but fact is the sherman had the highest crew survival rate as it was easy to get out of. I can't tell if this is a small hatch or the larger hatch version that had a decrease angle on the frontal armor and a spring on the hatch to open it faster

    • @ethanquarles9811
      @ethanquarles9811 2 роки тому +2

      Arourgedon: it’s a bit small in the driver’s seat.
      T-34 driver: First Time?

  • @Jjrmtv
    @Jjrmtv 3 роки тому +6

    this is by far the best video of inside a Sherman tank- great job!

  • @Siege-v3m
    @Siege-v3m 3 роки тому +36

    That actually Sherman tank with the 105mm howitzer gun, it was to support infantry, still rare a Sherman variant and good look inside. But yeah that Sherman with the 105mm howitzer gun.

    • @gerarddagle7580
      @gerarddagle7580 3 роки тому

      Thats not a howitzer

    • @Siege-v3m
      @Siege-v3m 3 роки тому +5

      @@gerarddagle7580 its a 105mm howitzer gun to support infantry while real gun was 75mm, 76mm and 17 pounder guns to fight tanks and infantry. That’s a howitzer.

    • @gerarddagle7580
      @gerarddagle7580 3 роки тому

      @@Siege-v3m mk

    • @notable9499
      @notable9499 3 роки тому

      Yeah that’s a 105, as you can see it’s shorter than a 75mm and a bit stubbier

    • @slaughterhouse5585
      @slaughterhouse5585 2 роки тому

      @@gerarddagle7580 She told me it felt like a howitzer to her. ☺️

  • @williamjohnston3770
    @williamjohnston3770 2 роки тому +24

    Great review and I didn't know that there was a 105mm version. 👍

    • @IrishAmerican17
      @IrishAmerican17 2 роки тому +3

      Actually the "Jumbo" had a 105mm, but I believe this tank is the 75mm version, even though he had 105 rounds, as the gun mantlet on the Jumbo was much different from any other version.

    • @Youeatbabies
      @Youeatbabies 2 роки тому +3

      M4A3 105mm, disappointing traversal speed, used as howitzer most of the time.

    • @senseofthecommonman
      @senseofthecommonman 2 роки тому +10

      @@IrishAmerican17 the jumbo was an assault tank with the 75mm, some were field modified with the 76mm could you provide your source that states it had the 105mm as I’ve never seen that.

    • @michaelbroshears2246
      @michaelbroshears2246 2 роки тому

      Aimer? I've always heard them called gunners

    • @Youeatbabies
      @Youeatbabies 2 роки тому +4

      @@IrishAmerican17 The jumbo only had the 75 and 76mm calibre, the HVSS Sherman did have the 105mm, it was only used as a howitzer.

  • @finbah5706
    @finbah5706 2 роки тому +4

    awesome!. amazing to get a first hand perspective of the INSIDE of one. From my computer! Thanks so much fo doing this. maybe do the same on the other vehicles. and an outside walk around tour too would be nice.

  • @TheCerberusInferno
    @TheCerberusInferno 3 роки тому +10

    This sherman tank is the kind of toy i want for my anniversary .

  • @robertmcwhinney4596
    @robertmcwhinney4596 2 роки тому +13

    I've always preferred the sherman, even as a kid, even though there are larger tanks, I just love the shape, speed, maneuverability, reliability and in the hands of a very experienced crew, I believe it was undefeatable even against a tiger.😳🤠👍

    • @michaelpielorz9283
      @michaelpielorz9283 2 роки тому +1

      undefeatable for shure , but only when the tc`s name was Brad Pitt as could be seen in that Fury documentation!

    • @charlestaylor253
      @charlestaylor253 8 місяців тому

      'I believe it was undefeatable, even against a tiger.'
      You must also believe in the Easter Bunny. 🐰

  • @volarre450
    @volarre450 4 роки тому +13

    Wow... i never imagined that the periscopes of the driver is so tiny. I thought it has a wide angle of some sort

  • @mraap4095
    @mraap4095 3 роки тому +9

    Excellent, just what I need to scratch build the interior for a M4A3(105)/HVSS scale model.

  • @longjohnsilver5179
    @longjohnsilver5179 3 роки тому +9

    Back in 1975 I was lucky enough to climb inside a Sherman left abandoned in the woods near Ettelbruk, Luxembourg. The top hatches were welded closed but I was able to enter from the bottom. My lasting impression is how little room there was for a crew to operate inside. I could see why so many tankers died. There's no way you could get out quickly.

    • @brennanleadbetter9708
      @brennanleadbetter9708 2 роки тому +1

      The Sherman was quite easy to get out of. They also had among the lowest crew casualty rates.

  • @ryanlewington6
    @ryanlewington6 2 роки тому

    Visited the museum last year. Really wanted to take a look inside so glad this video has been uploaded!

  • @bradjames6748
    @bradjames6748 2 роки тому +1

    Canada had a lot of wide tracked Shermans in the Italian campaign

  • @alexipilon8319
    @alexipilon8319 3 роки тому +11

    "As you can see we are moving"
    *Cling*
    "......good thing that wasn't live" then all of a sudden the last thing the camera records is the sound of the tank blowing up

  • @selflesscord8861
    @selflesscord8861 3 роки тому +12

    There was a 105 in fury? I gotta watch it again lol

    • @fdmackey3666
      @fdmackey3666 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah, I caught that too....It was, as I'm sure you're aware, a 75mm round. As a 1980s era U.S. tanker I "humped" enough 105mm rounds onto and into both M60A1 and (first model) M1 MBTs that I can spot one a mile away so to speak.

    • @davidvines6498
      @davidvines6498 3 роки тому +3

      He said that the tank was in the movie, not the Fury Tank Brad Pitt was in

  • @stephenmudiecastles.2938
    @stephenmudiecastles.2938 Рік тому

    I have been there, great little museum and well worth a visit.

  • @ianwatson7920
    @ianwatson7920 3 роки тому +10

    My Dad was a sergant in Sherman Tanks that after the breakout at El Alamein went up thru Italy with the NZ Division. He was at cassino and got shrapnel in the head while crossing the Sangro River..

    • @trevoratchison3904
      @trevoratchison3904 3 роки тому +2

      My father in law was a driver in Italy with the NZ 19th armoured Division. He told me a lot of funny stories about what they did to the Americans there.

    • @gerarddagle7580
      @gerarddagle7580 3 роки тому

      U mean a commander watson?

    • @jamesjarman5003
      @jamesjarman5003 3 роки тому +2

      My grandfather was also in Italy in Sherman’s with Nz division. Joined just after casino then went all the way to Trieste. Initially loader/ operator then eventually in charge of a troop.

  • @mememine69
    @mememine69 3 роки тому +5

    I worked in a park that had one on display and I managed to get inside because someone removed the original bottom of the tank and replaced it with thin sheet metal and a hole had developed from years of rust. I suppose it was to reduce weight. But I was amazed how there was literally nothing left inside. It was like being inside a balloon. Now they want to get this hunk of metal running again. How is it even possible?:)

  • @davidcoleman2796
    @davidcoleman2796 5 місяців тому

    I am playing with my son and his RC Sherman . He understands the history and the brave men . It's not all fun and games . Children must understand real life .

  • @niai69
    @niai69 4 роки тому +7

    "rare" seems a bit of an overstatement. Still, always good to see more details.

    • @phant0m879
      @phant0m879 4 роки тому

      They are rare most where destroyed in world war 2

    • @peterson7082
      @peterson7082 3 роки тому +7

      @@phant0m879 not the case, but very few 105mm. howitzer tanks were produced.

  • @dmitrymolotov6428
    @dmitrymolotov6428 3 роки тому +7

    0:38 not the most room?! That’s like a Cadillac compared to some tanks

  • @tomnolan9651
    @tomnolan9651 2 роки тому

    Thank you for your wonderful presentation of this piece of history.

  • @EverybodyKnowsJulian
    @EverybodyKnowsJulian 3 роки тому +2

    I did this before and there is still a tank at Lexington NE there’s a tank museum there

  • @volarre450
    @volarre450 4 роки тому +7

    I never noticed that the movie used 105 howitzer shermans. I thought it was all 75mm and 76mm

    • @stuartgarner5072
      @stuartgarner5072 3 роки тому

      This Sherman was in the early battalion scenes

  • @visi7754
    @visi7754 4 роки тому +2

    Simply Awesome and Thanks! Bet you wouldn't Swop Places! Smiles Xxx

  • @nelsonmedeiros3792
    @nelsonmedeiros3792 2 роки тому

    Cool! I watched the movie and was curious to see inside the tank, thanks for shared!

  • @Ronaldl2350
    @Ronaldl2350 2 роки тому

    Neat inside the tank. I have been by the arsenal that the gun was made at!

  • @markcantemail8018
    @markcantemail8018 2 роки тому

    Thank you for the Tour . Is that Watervliet Arsenal on the Breech ?

  • @stevewaller9346
    @stevewaller9346 3 роки тому +3

    Very interesting and informative video. You now have a new subscriber.

  • @lynnwood7205
    @lynnwood7205 2 роки тому

    Thank you for the tour.

  • @eliaslundstedt5607
    @eliaslundstedt5607 4 роки тому +8

    Clean that 50 cal up and blue it so it becomes a little nicer

    • @ArmourgeddonTanks
      @ArmourgeddonTanks  4 роки тому +2

      We have that many things to do hopefully one day we will have the time haha!

    • @paoloviti6156
      @paoloviti6156 4 роки тому +2

      Although the tank is well restored there also is rust on top of the breach but still I wouldn't mind to have the M4 in my garage. Lol...

    • @johnmcdonald587
      @johnmcdonald587 3 роки тому +1

      The .50, and all the MG's, would have been parkerized, not blued.

    • @eliaslundstedt5607
      @eliaslundstedt5607 3 роки тому

      @@johnmcdonald587 oh yeah true, allthough I have seen a 50cal blued before.

    • @johnmcdonald587
      @johnmcdonald587 3 роки тому

      @@eliaslundstedt5607 As have I. But not for that time period and application.

  • @timsparks1858
    @timsparks1858 10 місяців тому

    The Shermans were medium tanks. Against Panzer IIIs and IVs it dominated them. Heavys Panthers and Tigers were another matter. Until Firefly s and M-4 A8s they had to wait for Tank Destroyers or P-47s with 500 lbs bombs or try to gang up on them.

  • @stevemurtagh8071
    @stevemurtagh8071 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent piece of film. Very informative. ☘️☘️

  • @fredlance2538
    @fredlance2538 2 роки тому

    nice video my dad was a commander , he stood 6 foot 3 and hated to ride buttoned up , he was in the first Armored division , served in North Africa Sicily and Italy . I wanted to crawl inside A Sherman for as long as I can remember .

  • @geraldfrasure9849
    @geraldfrasure9849 3 роки тому

    Thanks for video I have been a WW2 war buff ,most my life

  • @theochan2911
    @theochan2911 3 роки тому

    Love the Sherman, thanks for sharing.

  • @jimhenry9936
    @jimhenry9936 3 роки тому +8

    I just cringed when I looked at the inside front glacis,solid steel.
    They hadn't figured out the concept of spall liners yet.
    A round coming through the tank armor is going to splatter molten metal shards all through interior, those poor guys inside.
    What hell is like.
    I worked in the early 70's with a number of former WWII vets.
    One of them was a Sherman tank driver.
    He never said much, he just cringed and shook his head when asked what tank warfare was like.
    If not his tank, seeing other tanks "brewed up" and witnessing the charred ,mangled remains of fellow tankers after getting hit.
    These young men lived through their own hell, the same in every war.
    I wanted to be a tank commander, when I was going through the Army Induction Center in 1970.
    I still love tanks.

    • @Vincent98987
      @Vincent98987 2 роки тому

      That m4a3 hvss hull can still bounce shots from panzer 3's

    • @Vincent98987
      @Vincent98987 2 роки тому

      Probably the best angled front glacis of every sherman besides jumbo

  • @deejayimm
    @deejayimm 2 роки тому

    I was lucky enough to get the opportunity to crawl around inside of a Sherman when I was a kid but unfortunately it was so long ago I barely remember it.

  • @qinsan1282
    @qinsan1282 3 роки тому +4

    Question
    The 105 Sherman you had was hand cranked?

    • @Tonyx.yt.
      @Tonyx.yt. 3 роки тому +4

      no, there's electric motor too for turrret rotation, manual was for fine movements to aim

    • @qinsan1282
      @qinsan1282 3 роки тому +2

      @@Tonyx.yt. Thank you for the clarification!

    • @stuartgarner5072
      @stuartgarner5072 3 роки тому +2

      The 105mm Sherman turret was only hand cranked but the 75mm and 76mm Sherman's had hydraulic traverse.

    • @lol-un6nl
      @lol-un6nl 3 роки тому +1

      @@stuartgarner5072 some crews jurry rigged a eletric motor in it, but for some reason the army command removed electric traverse when it came out the factory

    • @skriv0in0navn
      @skriv0in0navn 2 роки тому

      @@lol-un6nl there actually was powered traverse kit for the 105, but they never was fitted because the crew belived the commanders on the field would start to treat them as regular 75mm shermans

  • @ExplorersCompass82
    @ExplorersCompass82 3 роки тому +7

    Now I know how my War Thunder crew feels

    • @RandomPerson-ob1hk
      @RandomPerson-ob1hk 3 роки тому

      "Fire in the engine department!"

    • @ExplorersCompass82
      @ExplorersCompass82 3 роки тому

      @@RandomPerson-ob1hk crew can’t perform their duties while putting out fire

    • @alpha-oi3bf
      @alpha-oi3bf 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/1hYftg1-jgw/v-deo.html

  • @bjjace1
    @bjjace1 Рік тому +1

    Fantastic video

  • @davidcoleman2796
    @davidcoleman2796 5 місяців тому

    I love tanks. Also submarines. I have been In lots but .... there is NO way I would have served in one . I would not last a day , these men were so brave .

  • @jameshall1075
    @jameshall1075 3 роки тому +1

    Best job I ever had.

  • @astrayp01
    @astrayp01 Рік тому

    What is the reason to reverse the installation of the left track?(T54E1).

  • @ronaldwatson1951
    @ronaldwatson1951 2 роки тому

    Very Good Alex 👍

  • @2Atreehugger
    @2Atreehugger 2 роки тому +1

    I think the main “fury” tank was an A3 with better float suspension and the big gun.

    • @Little_1-1
      @Little_1-1 2 роки тому +1

      yep, M4A3E8, M3 76mm gun, T23 turret, different transmission etc...

  • @jmuraidajr
    @jmuraidajr 2 роки тому

    When I was a kid we had a Sherman Tank at our American Legion in the small town I grew up in! We use to play Army on and In that Tank, it was open so we could get in it! It was small even for us kids, I don't know how men could work in there?

  • @damirbujan8312
    @damirbujan8312 2 роки тому +1

    It's not the M4A3E8 "Fury" its M4A3(105)

  • @Tawada
    @Tawada 2 роки тому

    Is the periscope movement independent of the coaxial machine gun or do they both move automatically?

  • @robertpeters4075
    @robertpeters4075 2 роки тому

    This is great, Thanks... This guy collects old things like Christmas trees?

  • @jaredharris1970
    @jaredharris1970 2 роки тому

    In warm climates where the humidity was high it must have been horrible inside I bet they all smelled great lol

  • @squire4569
    @squire4569 2 роки тому

    I can tell your heart stopped when that shell dropped

  • @josephbaca9681
    @josephbaca9681 3 роки тому +1

    Pretty snazzy... good job.

  • @robertshoemaker6204
    @robertshoemaker6204 2 роки тому +1

    My father was a tank commander for General Patton...had such stories...ps M4 main gun was a 75mm not a 105mm.

    • @ArmourgeddonTanks
      @ArmourgeddonTanks  2 роки тому +1

      I can imagine he did! Yes most were 75mm but this one is a 105 commonly known for bunker busting

    • @robertshoemaker6204
      @robertshoemaker6204 2 роки тому

      @@ArmourgeddonTanks oh wow..sorry my bad...that's cool seen the firefly the Bristish had a 3 or 4 pounder and the late war 76mm....thanks appreciate the response....I remember my dad saying they had to hit the panzer 3 or 4 in the back or in the wheels...the Panzer V and Tigers...run or gang up on them....take them out with numbers. Shoe

  • @Pittsspecials
    @Pittsspecials 2 роки тому

    You said they were 105 mm main gun. I thought they were a low velocity 76mm except the later production “Fire Fly” which had a higher velocity 76 and longer barrel. ????????

  • @seven755zi
    @seven755zi 3 роки тому

    Got the chager for smartfon inside cabin?

  • @laakona8381
    @laakona8381 3 роки тому +1

    105MM? When was an M68 canon installed on a Sherman?

    • @peterson7082
      @peterson7082 3 роки тому +2

      105mm. howitzer, fitted to about ~2000 tanks

  • @Emtbtoday
    @Emtbtoday 4 роки тому +1

    Would love to see a jumbo

  • @Emtbtoday
    @Emtbtoday 3 роки тому

    I'm trying to find out what colour the under side padding of the loaders hatch was, I can't find it in any walk around video's it's one tiny thing that's important for us armour modeler's having the hatches open u think they would be black leather but so many do them Brown!

    • @Bochi42
      @Bochi42 3 роки тому

      I think they look darker here because of aging.

  • @Mrfishreed
    @Mrfishreed Рік тому

    since when did Sherman pack a 105mmm cannon?

  • @robertmcwhinney4596
    @robertmcwhinney4596 2 роки тому

    If a privateer got his hands on a sherman and was license to purchase ammo. How much would it cost each time they shot at a target? How much would each round cost? Just wondering.🤠👍

  • @krispannel488
    @krispannel488 3 роки тому +5

    Claustrophobic? Have you ever seen modern tanks and IFV's? This sherman is like a living room.

  • @jamesharrison6201
    @jamesharrison6201 3 роки тому

    Yeah, STD armament was a 75mm medium velocity gun

  • @bobologic6849
    @bobologic6849 3 роки тому +1

    the WW2 M4 sherman used a 75mm M3 cannon

    • @ArmourgeddonTanks
      @ArmourgeddonTanks  3 роки тому +4

      Hi there! This one used a 105mm as it was commonly known as the “bunker buster” most did have the 76mm though

  • @stevengamer9147
    @stevengamer9147 3 роки тому +2

    Nice M4 Sherman I'm From Indonesia

  • @lindsaychallis3465
    @lindsaychallis3465 4 роки тому +2

    Who was the commander of the tank in fury Peterson big cowskie or davis

    • @paleo1825
      @paleo1825 4 роки тому

      Fury was commanded by “War daddy” or “Top” this sherman in the video is not known

    • @charlessmith8338
      @charlessmith8338 4 роки тому

      This is a regular M4 Sherman which isn’t the same on in Fury. The type of tank Fury was is a M4a1e8 Sherman. And the commanders name is Don Collier

    • @paleo1825
      @paleo1825 4 роки тому

      @@charlessmith8338 ahhh sorry i misread his comment i thought he was specificfically talking about the actual tank named fury in the film thanks for clearing that up tho!

    • @charlessmith8338
      @charlessmith8338 4 роки тому

      @@paleo1825 your all good man

    • @paleo1825
      @paleo1825 4 роки тому

      @@charlessmith8338 :thumbs up:

  • @sadzasnake1755
    @sadzasnake1755 2 роки тому

    I think the name you are looking for is a bump helmet.

  • @charlieneedham9341
    @charlieneedham9341 3 роки тому +1

    Is your museum in London or the UK

  • @philipmason3218
    @philipmason3218 2 роки тому

    Sorry for my stupid question, what happened if someone really needed to use the toilet, so to speak. I'm assuming in action it was just do it.

    • @jayman0079
      @jayman0079 Рік тому

      You go outside the tank OR do it in a bottle or a bag.

  • @tonycollins2615
    @tonycollins2615 9 місяців тому

    Thanks, my Father was the Kiwi Commander of a Sherman tank who planned and was granted permission to contact a sole effort. In stripped down mode, loaded with armour piecing ammunition broke the Gothic Line at Rimini Airfield by sneaking up and with seven hits destroyed the embedded Panther Turret that had caused utter havoc knocking out many Tanks, especially Canadians. He was awarded an immediate Military Cross.

  • @8Flamingos
    @8Flamingos 10 місяців тому

    This tank isnt in fury but the easy 8, m4a1 76, m4a1 and the m4a2 was this an m4a3 105 sherman

  • @Skipcarey
    @Skipcarey 3 роки тому

    pitt was in a 76mm sherman(either the easy8 or the jumbo)not this tank this tank has a 75mm gun

    • @peterson7082
      @peterson7082 3 роки тому

      This is a 105mm. Howitzer tank

  • @polearm9341
    @polearm9341 4 роки тому +2

    Thats a 105mm sherman it has a modified hull

  • @theodorelee369
    @theodorelee369 3 роки тому +1

    Left side track is on backwards.

  • @西方秀則
    @西方秀則 2 роки тому +1

    シャーマン戦車ですか?

  • @tomsackett4497
    @tomsackett4497 2 роки тому +1

    did not know Shermans had a 105 think he meant 70 or 75 mm gun

  • @CaliforniaFly
    @CaliforniaFly 2 роки тому +3

    Early WWII Shermans had 75mm guns. Later ones had 76mm guns with more velocity. I've never heard of a Sherman with a 105mm.

    • @Litauen-yg9ut
      @Litauen-yg9ut 2 роки тому

      There was one, meant for close support like the Stug origionally was...

    • @michaelcampin1464
      @michaelcampin1464 2 роки тому +1

      The Firefly had a 17lb gun but that was British not American

    • @chadjustice8560
      @chadjustice8560 2 роки тому +1

      The 105 Sherman was in theory to be used against fortifications but was used more in a artillery role. They even went to Korea for the same the role.

    • @wheels-n-tires1846
      @wheels-n-tires1846 2 роки тому

      Didnt the Israeli "Super Shermans" get 105s??? I know this isnt one of them but...

    • @rph111745
      @rph111745 2 роки тому +1

      @@Litauen-yg9ut There was a 105mm howitzer built on a Sherman chassis, but was not a tank., no turret just an open bay artillery piece. i t was the M7 "Priest"

  • @colingibson3921
    @colingibson3921 2 роки тому

    Anyone know how many smoke shell's they had????

  • @ldnwholesale8552
    @ldnwholesale8552 2 роки тому

    But does ithave cup holders?

    • @EliVeach
      @EliVeach Рік тому

      that's on your belt lol

  • @damirbujan8312
    @damirbujan8312 2 роки тому

    The real fury tank is in the museum in Britain

    • @ArmourgeddonTanks
      @ArmourgeddonTanks  2 роки тому +1

      Hi! Yes that’s right the hero tank is in bovington tank museum. This is was also in the film fury and was used in the background as stated

  • @brianharrison8919
    @brianharrison8919 2 роки тому

    Nothing like an old purple heart box

  • @austinrudd5150
    @austinrudd5150 4 роки тому +2

    Go on alex 🤙

  • @sam2753
    @sam2753 2 роки тому

    I had to laugh out loud, literally, when they showed the "interior" of a supposed M1A1 Abrams in the first episode of The Walking Dead (the one where Rick Grimes was trapped inside?) as it showed an expansive smooth floor and LOTS of room! LOL Hollywood at it's "finest"...

  • @西方秀則
    @西方秀則 2 роки тому +1

    それともパットン戦車ですか。

  • @chumbrega2
    @chumbrega2 3 роки тому

    Thank you!

  • @weaponeer
    @weaponeer 3 роки тому +1

    seemed like the wrong model of Browning 1919's (and get some oil on that 50) I was an armorer for 16 of my 18 years in the US Army.

  • @cristiclutch8951
    @cristiclutch8951 4 роки тому +1

    105 mm?

  • @michaelcampin1464
    @michaelcampin1464 2 роки тому

    At 6ft 2 I may be a tad too tall for a tanker.

    • @seanoconnor5968
      @seanoconnor5968 2 роки тому

      I'm 6'4" and I did every job on an M1 tank.

  • @manweller1
    @manweller1 3 роки тому +1

    It must have been bed wetting during battle. Just imagine being in the sight of King Tiger or Panzer Mark 4

  • @upsetdoggo5199
    @upsetdoggo5199 3 роки тому +1

    Hm I thought the fury sherman was a 76mm

    • @ArmourgeddonTanks
      @ArmourgeddonTanks  3 роки тому +1

      The hero tank was i believe. Our Sherman was used in the background of the movie

    • @upsetdoggo5199
      @upsetdoggo5199 3 роки тому

      Ah, makes sense

  • @user-ki8nw5ki5o
    @user-ki8nw5ki5o 3 роки тому

    In modern day the Abrams isn’t any roomier!

  • @ChipEstrada
    @ChipEstrada 2 роки тому

    Brad Pitt's "Fury" was an M4A1 with a 76mm Gun. Not the 75mm shown in this video. The M4A1 had a larger Turret, it would be nice if the people doing these kinds of videos also did a lot more research into the equipment used in the movies they are explaining. (Free Tip from US Army Paratrooper) Still gave you a thumbs up.

    • @ArmourgeddonTanks
      @ArmourgeddonTanks  2 роки тому +2

      Hi! As stated in the video this Sherman was in the film fury. We don’t say it was the hero tank, that’s in bovington, but this was in the background of the camp scene

    • @Vincent98987
      @Vincent98987 2 роки тому

      But m4a1 had a round hull tho

  • @michaelhintz4785
    @michaelhintz4785 2 роки тому

    I thought furry was a 1944 British Sherman variate known as a fire fly with the 17 pound gun that’s why I had a longer barrel Than other Sherman variance in the Movie the British version had a better chance of survival against German panthers and tigers with a 17 pound gun

    • @chadjustice8560
      @chadjustice8560 2 роки тому

      Why would it be a firefly when it's an American tank unit? It wouldn't be because after going through testing the Americans hated the firefly and it's probably the worst version of the Sherman. Per after action reports the Sherman was 5 times better on the defensive and 3 times better on the offensive over the panther so yeah that's speaks for itself lol the tiger, hardly anyone saw them let alone a working one so the chance of survival was great against both.

    • @senseofthecommonman
      @senseofthecommonman 2 роки тому

      @@chadjustice8560 the Americans tested the 17pdr but went with their own less effective 76mm.
      To say the firefly was the worst version demonstrates a lack of knowledge.
      In terms of infantry support the standard 75mm he was more effective, but against heavy German tanks the 17pdr was the ONLY effective weapon in mid 44 when it was needed most.
      Perfect example being the battle of villas bocage, here 1 tiger destroyed many British tanks including 1 firefly that obviously didn’t fire first, the other 75mm equipped Cromwells couldn’t knock the tiger out.
      A few weeks later 4 tigers fell in the space of a few minutes to a couple of firefly’s.
      I have never seen any documented report of firefly crews thinking theirs was the worst version, if I was to go to war I would choose the firefly every time and recommend you get a 75mm.

  • @matthewcullen1298
    @matthewcullen1298 9 місяців тому

    Some how i feel if i was in a battle zone id rather be outside of a tank.

  • @mistrmerrick
    @mistrmerrick 3 роки тому

    5:33, oh my god