Deconstructing Devduttology - Nityananda Misra Reviews 10 Heads Of Ravana

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 131

  • @vanhannu
    @vanhannu Рік тому +40

    Such a scholarly work by Subhodeep ji and then the intellectual comments from Shri Nityanand ji is so nice to watch.

  • @aniltiwary7032
    @aniltiwary7032 Рік тому +17

    Wonderful. Waiting for kindle edition. Thanks Infinity Foundation. Immense work!!!❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @shephherd
    @shephherd Рік тому +3

    It makes me happy to think this content is available online. Grateful for your contributions...

  • @vivekanandsharma4327
    @vivekanandsharma4327 Рік тому +6

    India and Hindus are proud on infinity foundation. Such a great and most assential required work. We are obliged and thankful for their hard work. I wish all the best for their success.

  • @srinivasrg5125
    @srinivasrg5125 Рік тому +7

    Thank you Nityanand Sir, and thank you, Rajiv Sir, for everything.

  • @shyama5612
    @shyama5612 Рік тому +16

    You should interview Shubhodeep - list down top 5 issues and ask him to address them - that would make it more interesting and reach more audience. Similar to the sanskrit nonstranslable series of videos - the best and most engrossing content on your channel.

  • @snehashispanda1651
    @snehashispanda1651 Рік тому +41

    monotheism is blamed as the instigator of ignorance, oppression, and violence. Monotheism has been a "totalizing discourse", often co-opting all aspects of a social belief system, resulting in the exclusion of "others". Monotheism is less pluralistic and thus less tolerant than polytheism, because monotheism stipulates that people pigeonhole their beliefs into one tenet. "Monotheism is irreconcilable with the existence in our nature of the instincts of benevolence" because it compels followers to devote themselves to a single Creator. The logic of monotheism ... yields little basis for tolerating other religions". Monotheism anesthetize the sense of wonder as if one were committed to a single line of thought by a cosmic legal contract".

    • @seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388
      @seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388 Рік тому

      Monotheism is the belief in The One True God , The Creator of ALL, Who created man and woman in His Image having great value. It’s the separation of man from God that brought in selfishness which results in greed and exploitation. And that’s why His constant drawing to Himself of His sons and daughters
      In fact monotheism will bring Righteousness peace and Joy

    • @binaysingh4883
      @binaysingh4883 Рік тому +1

      How come monotheism being less pluralistic becomes less tolerant?

    • @vish2553
      @vish2553 Рік тому +5

      oh, the male egocentric guy sitting on high clouds ( btw being formless but a male and sitting on a formless bottom )has a MIND! And imagination!! And thoughts like ordinary mortals 😳
      Ishwara/ Bhgvan is beyond mind body and senses!

    • @vish2553
      @vish2553 Рік тому +3

      @@binaysingh4883 my or the highway is the answer.

    • @RajshekherGarikapati
      @RajshekherGarikapati Рік тому +1

      Neither is monotheism the problem, nor is it the solution; it is just one among many beliefs. The belief that God does not exist, is also an intolerant bigotry. The real problem is being “Naastik” - the belief that there is no relationship between one living creature with another - that life is solely for the pleasure of my existence. Whether God exists or not in your belief system, you can be a better person if you find some way to believe in the rights and needs of others before you come to your own rights and needs. No religion is needed for this, and no religion which does not make you selfless has value to Mankind.

  • @jadabeswarbhattacharjee3537
    @jadabeswarbhattacharjee3537 Рік тому +32

    Devdutt started his career as a writer on Hinduism to promote it. But down the line, he became a Macaulay putra.

  • @jaym_108
    @jaym_108 Рік тому +7

    Great analysis by Subhodeep ji. "Masala Author" 😆😆😆

  • @Seevawonderloaf
    @Seevawonderloaf Рік тому +3

    You guys are killing it! Keep up the good work!

  • @allbritecarcare
    @allbritecarcare Рік тому +4

    Thx for discussing Devdata’s work. I being in the west was initially fooled by his analysis but had some doubts. Now I know why he was treating everything as mythology by using western scholars. Good work. Thx and keep up good work. 🙏

  • @JrJ2016
    @JrJ2016 Рік тому +5

    Thank you both!

    • @JrJ2016
      @JrJ2016 Рік тому +3

      Great service to Indians by exposing shallowdutt patanaik

  • @neelghosh3970
    @neelghosh3970 Рік тому +7

    জয় শ্রী গনেশ। জয় সীতা রাম। জয় বজরং বলি হনুমান কি জয়। জয় রাধে কৃষ্ণ। হর হর মহাদেব। সত্য সনাতন ধৰ্ম কি জয়।

    • @simpleboy4392
      @simpleboy4392 5 місяців тому

      জয় শ্রীরাম।❤❤🤝🤝

  • @shravanyalala
    @shravanyalala Рік тому +7

    New title - Devdutt Pattnaik's masala world!!

  • @raviji7950
    @raviji7950 Рік тому +1

    Rajiv ji, stands - a Rishi, a modern Vyas - dealing in Hindu literature for our times at the same time defending and attacking, Kshatreeta Brahman. It is an act to emulate as much as one can by us all. raviji T&T.

  • @shyamkantverma1262
    @shyamkantverma1262 Рік тому

    Nityananda ji 🙏 for a very Rational Analysis .

  • @jyotivyas9286
    @jyotivyas9286 Рік тому +9

    हिन्दू सबसे evolved है और रहेगा सदा ही😊👌💐👍😊

  • @yoeselnima5587
    @yoeselnima5587 9 місяців тому +2

    Buddha had never accepted untouchability and caste system. Buddha said anyone can practise Buddha dharma and become Buddha. Buddha said that all sentient beings are Buddha by nature. 'Hinayana' is a name given by Mahayana to Shravakayana Buddhists on the basis of their view, path and fruit. Buddha was against the prevailing untouchability tradition. He denounced the untouchablilty tradition propagated by certain traditions.

  • @jyotivyas9286
    @jyotivyas9286 Рік тому +1

    यस🎉प्रणाम

  • @AbcDef-gw4dg
    @AbcDef-gw4dg Рік тому +1

    Ravana had 10 heads in real. Old painting, craving before 18th century show it.

  • @anitamanns
    @anitamanns Рік тому +1

    So agree with you...his interpretation is so misleading ... Nothing like what advaita Vedanta Talks about

  • @nisargparmar9022
    @nisargparmar9022 Рік тому

    Next round for PRASHANTOLOGY please.

  • @statickk14
    @statickk14 Рік тому +1

    If Devdutt Pattanaik is an expert on Hinduism , then I am Marilyn Monroe

  • @Dog_Car_2468
    @Dog_Car_2468 Рік тому +3

    Excellent analysis!

  • @sujathadorairaj429
    @sujathadorairaj429 Рік тому +9

    I am worried about the future of Hinduism/ Sanatana Dharma because of people like Dev Dutt who’ll misguide the youth /future generations of secular Hindus.

  • @kameswararao3058
    @kameswararao3058 Рік тому

    Jaigurudev

  • @swarup.k.dasgupta537
    @swarup.k.dasgupta537 Рік тому

    *Devdutt Pattanaik* playing a good role to deviate the Hindu young generation and we can say that he born as Hindu but to work for the devaluing, defaming, degrading and demeaning of the original, philosophies, philosophical mythology of Sanatan Dharma and its structural integrity.
    *Devdutt Pattanaik* written so many books applying his *Intellect* and after little study, I found him a man of *"Tāmasik Intellect" !*
    *Intellect (Buddi):*
    *Classification of Human in terms of INTELLECT into 3 types: GITA, chapter 18:*
    🔴Bhagavad Gita 14.1
    The Divine Lord said: I shall once again explain to you the *supreme wisdom, the best of all knowledge;* by knowing which, all the great saints attained the highest perfection. *(To explain different types of Intellects possessed are called "Supreme wisdom".)*
    *Intellects of all human beings are classified into 3 main categories, namely, "Tāmasik Intellect", "Rajasic Intellect" and "Sattvic Intellect."*
    *Sattvic Intellect(Buddi):*
    Bhagavad Gita 18.30. The intellect is said to be in the nature of goodness, O Parth, *when it correctly understands* "difference between Dharma and Adharma", "path of activities and renunciation" and "what is proper action and what is improper action", "what is duty and what is non-duty", "what is to be feared and what is not to be feared", "what is binding force and what is liberating force" and "what is called bondage and what is called liberation" is called *Sattvic Intellect.*
    *🔴Rājasik Intellect (Buddi):*
    Bhagavad Gita 18.31. *The intellect* is considered in the mode of passion when it is confused between righteousness and unrighteousness, and cannot distinguish between right and wrong conduct. Humans under raja do not truly perceive "what is Dharma and what is Adharma," "what ought to be done and what should not," though they try to know and want to know all about the realities but can't.
    *🔴Tāmasik Intellect(Buddi):*
    *Bhagavad Gita 18.32. That intellect which is shrouded in darkness, imagining "irreligion to be religion", "good as bad and bad as good", "duties as non-duties and non-duties as duties", "adharma as dharma and dharma as adharma", and "perceiving untruth to be the truth" and all kinds of things contrarily, knows all knowable vice versa, sees all things upside down, is of the nature of "ignorance".*

  • @sanjayssane
    @sanjayssane Рік тому

    I also would like to know Rajiv ji's current opinion on Nithyanand of Kailasa

  • @vinayb5746
    @vinayb5746 Рік тому +10

    Also there is a guy Ranbeer who does podcasts.. he is not like devdutt but he is definitely confused and falls under spiritual but not religious bracket..

    • @anjalidalaya6816
      @anjalidalaya6816 Рік тому +4

      Yes he needs to be educated about the true nature of Hinduism

    • @Anti-NWO
      @Anti-NWO Рік тому +6

      He's here for merely money making. Nothing about spiritualism or religion.

    • @vinayb5746
      @vinayb5746 Рік тому +1

      @@Anti-NWO if so that is dangerous..

  • @desicat3563
    @desicat3563 Рік тому

    🙏🙏

  • @renukantsinghyadav8423
    @renukantsinghyadav8423 Рік тому

    धार्यते इति धर्म:

  • @SatyanarayanaNaik
    @SatyanarayanaNaik 7 місяців тому

    Misra ji why discuss about such headless... people

  • @rambaile8398
    @rambaile8398 Рік тому +6

    I used to view devdut views on our culture. Now I understand he is not correct. Please keep up the good work exposing pseudo Hindus. I see Hindus started understanding the kaniving pseudo Hindus like devdut.

  • @rashtrabhakt3002
    @rashtrabhakt3002 Рік тому +1

    हिन्दुओ को खासकर युवाओ को कुछ भी पढ़ने से पहले सोचना समझना चाहिए। पहले अपने ग्रन्थो को पढ़े।जिससे सही गलत का बोध हो सके।हिन्दी या भारतीय भाषाओं के लेखको को अधिक पढ़े।

  • @vidyaamirapu7440
    @vidyaamirapu7440 Рік тому +5

    Excellent analysis! Glad that another scholar has deconstructed this fraud Devdutt Patnaik

  • @rameshmuttur1236
    @rameshmuttur1236 Рік тому +5

    Devdutt Pattnaik is a tasteless masala box, trying to cook masala dosa in a pizz hut

  • @gitamishra7131
    @gitamishra7131 5 місяців тому +1

    Devdutt's writings have always seemed ill-informed, non scholarly , driven by his own fancies. He never seemed to have any knowledge, in fact Prof Rajeev Malhotra has explained about his writings and few other people have also done so but the way u have busted his lies is commendable. Hope Neo sanatanis will benefit from this specially those who know less about sanatan and want to get some knowledge in capsules.

  • @theingloriousvagabond9086
    @theingloriousvagabond9086 Рік тому

    Which 'standard' dictionary says that the meaning of Aryamarg is Buddhist in origin? The concept of "Nation-State" indeed is a recent development. When travellers and invaders came to India, this country was divided into various provinces and the masses of these provinces never had a national consciousness, or the consciousness of being a part of an imagined community called "India".
    Devdutt is not the only one who blames Brahmanism for perpetuating caste. The chairman of the the Drafting Committee, Dr. B.R Ambedkar, also had the same views regarding the Brahmins. Please read "The Annihilation of Caste" if you doubt me. I am not in favour of ridiculing any man for his caste though for a man is far more than his caste.
    Good Luck with whatever you wish to prove.

  • @dracharya5037
    @dracharya5037 10 місяців тому

    Devdutt is at best a 3rd rate mmbs doctor.

  • @संजयगोस्वामी-ग6ह

    Buddha cousin

  • @lalluchettan
    @lalluchettan Рік тому +4

    No, no. There are various Christian myths. They are myths because they may not be historically accurate, but rather intended to convey moral or spiritual lessons. Mythological themes and elements occur throughout Christian literature. The creation story in Genesis, which includes the account of Adam and Eve and the Garden of Eden; the story of Noah and the Great Flood; the story of Jonah and the whale; the story of the Tower of Babel; the story of the birth of Jesus Christ… these are just a few. With Islam, they share these myths.

    • @seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388
      @seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388 Рік тому

      Myths? Books in the Bible are not myths but anything, man made is a myth. That’s why Jesus told us to follow Him and not man. As our heart is deceitful

    • @vish2553
      @vish2553 Рік тому +6

      Take away the “ mythical original sin” and Christianity collapses like a weakling. The very foundation is based on myth.

    • @lalluchettan
      @lalluchettan Рік тому +2

      @@vish2553 yes. You may be right. But then all religions have a heavy dose of mythology. Without that, they can't survive

    • @Anti-NWO
      @Anti-NWO Рік тому +2

      @@lalluchettan yes but Christianity has bigotry.

    • @lalluchettan
      @lalluchettan Рік тому

      @@Anti-NWO Oh yes. Like the Christian White supremicists in the US and Hungary. Let us go a little further: fundamentalist Jews in Israel, and fundamentalists in Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism. Bigotry is the favourite breakfast for the right wing.

  • @achlan5000
    @achlan5000 7 місяців тому

    Sasta writer hai ye devdutt. Isko to mai amazon pe search bhi na karu !!

  • @minnievenkat
    @minnievenkat Рік тому +2

    I don’t know how I feel about episode. These jokers are even tackling this only because Devdutt was successful

    • @2007krishnan
      @2007krishnan Рік тому +4

      Then why r u watching ? If u r. A fan of Devdutt stay away ...it's clear frm the title wht the video was going to be about ....if facts bother u so much then u hv a lopsided view ...u hv no right to stop someone frm criticizing a shallow work ...u however can choose wht to consume ..if u dnt like dnt watch ..dnt preach n call ppl jokers ..itni mirchi lagi hai aapko toh mat dekho ...he isn't saying anything wrong ...

    • @sanjaybhatt60
      @sanjaybhatt60 Рік тому +3

      so successful he keeps his comment section off, so nobody can expose him.
      He has 0 knowledge of any scriptures.

    • @punisherwarlord
      @punisherwarlord Рік тому +1

      So Devdutt "was" successful????? is he dead now??? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @udayshankarghosal3073
    @udayshankarghosal3073 Рік тому

    Devdutt is a fame chaser and has a cowardice disposition

  • @varunahmitrah
    @varunahmitrah Рік тому +4

    This Nityananda Swami & the casteist Infinity Foundation has significant problems with a non-Brahmin commenting on Indian religion. They have no issues when brahmins like Amish Tripathi rewrite puranic texts. Rajiv Malmutra & his southern black Brahmin companion is making all Nityanandas go crazy. We Indians have the right to opine on our understanding of Indian religion, and we don't need the permission of Brahmins to do so. If you don't like it, then don't read it.

    • @offencebestdefence500
      @offencebestdefence500 Рік тому +10

      Have u heard of purvapaksha ???
      If alll Indians can interpret text why not Rajiv and his southern black brahmin companion????😂😂😂😂
      You kinda gave a self defeating argument there😂
      N the hate u emit is the same or greater than what you accuse others of..

    • @offencebestdefence500
      @offencebestdefence500 Рік тому +8

      N to quote you
      IF U DONT LIKE IT DONT READ IT !!!!
      😂😂

    • @varunahmitrah
      @varunahmitrah Рік тому +1

      They are not interpreting texts but slandering & maligning Devdutt P. They can criticize his texts but comparing him to one head of Ravana is beyond defamation which is a result of a sustained effort from their lobby to defame him.

    • @offencebestdefence500
      @offencebestdefence500 Рік тому

      @@varunahmitrah He must sue them for defamation asap.. !!!

    • @varunahmitrah
      @varunahmitrah Рік тому

      @@offencebestdefence500 Yes he should 😡.

  • @1575ZVPHEF-kien
    @1575ZVPHEF-kien Рік тому

    DEVDUTTOLOGY.
    WHAT RIDICULOUS NONSENSE WORD.
    SHAVAN-MUTROLOGY WOULD BE BETTER.

  • @minnievenkat
    @minnievenkat Рік тому +2

    Shallow or not, he played an important role. This is Monday morning football. Criticism nearly a decade later. Things discussed out of time and context. This is a needlessly hurtful take down of an individual by all the authors of this book. This is bullying. Shame on you

    • @jai6196
      @jai6196 Рік тому +11

      Why is critical evaluation of Devdutt's work shameful? If the critique is factually incorrect, then you respond with facts..

    • @melio_das4543
      @melio_das4543 Рік тому +1

      Bullying 😂😂😂

    • @rajatsrivastava7791
      @rajatsrivastava7791 Рік тому +3

      He presented purva paksha. You come up with uttar paksha.

    • @Athato_Brahmajijnasa
      @Athato_Brahmajijnasa Рік тому +1

      Is he a crybaby 😂😂😂

    • @raviji7950
      @raviji7950 Рік тому +1

      Venkat ji,
      But you have not made any clarification on any of the comments made about Shri Deva Datt ji. raviji

  • @VincentGopal
    @VincentGopal Рік тому

    There are so many not-so-hindu. Hindus who are trying to dismantle Hinduism. Why are they doing this is it money the cause
    Is it notoriety I can understand people from other religions doing this but someone being Hindu and trying to degrade Hinduism befuddling.😢

  • @TheOne-nw5wp
    @TheOne-nw5wp Рік тому

    🙏🙏🙏