Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
QUAD CORTEX GOT A HUGE UPDATE!! CorOS 2.1.0
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 сер 2024
- Want to support the channel? Check out my affiliate links here sweetwater.sjv...
Write in your requests for future QC content in the comments!
NDSP QUAD CORTEX HUGE UPDATE CorOS 2.1.0
This video is a run through of some of my favorite features added in the new CorOS update from NDSP for the Quad Cortex.
Tip Jar - paypal.me/stevensterlacci
Gear I Use (Amazon Affiliate)
Guitar Related
Line 6 HX Stomp amzn.to/3cl8M5N
Line 6 HX FX amzn.to/3fD4JDJ
Reunion Blues RBX 2E Double Bag amzn.to/3d1iw4B
Studio Headphones (Cans) amzn.to/3cmfZ5t
My Favorite Cables amzn.to/2WNhZxg
Strings I use amzn.to/2yHd5tv
Suhr Reactive Load IR amzn.to/2yHsOJ1
Picks! amzn.to/2Ackm4R
Guitar Rack amzn.to/2YNxhVa
Camera and Lighting Related
Camera amzn.to/3ckvDhF
Best Lens for M50 amzn.to/3fE4iso
Camera AC Power amzn.to/36BpJXr
Camera Shotgun Mic amzn.to/37v88AR
Camera Batteries amzn.to/2TLh1AL
B Camera amzn.to/3biNYuj
Cell Phone Mic amzn.to/2YMwoMu
Vocal Mic amzn.to/3fBPafy
Tabletop Lights amzn.to/35JptFu
Light Ring amzn.to/3bmiyDc
00:00 Intro
00:35 CAB SIM FOR CAPTURES!!!
1:25 New Devices
2:37 Redesigned Cabs
3:17 New Gig View
4:06 Making a Basic Preset with New Additions
Dude, I was honestly thinking about selling mine, but this update totally surprised me, it will hold me over for a while. I too could notice a difference in the latency immediately, I've been gigging with the consistently for about 6 months now
I had huge problems with latency through the system. I guess some people are more susceptible to that than others. anyhow I cured it by not using the cab blocks. take that out and put an IR in there or even an eq and bingo all the latency went away! I like it now.
Great demo, thanks for playing the MK3 for so long :)
I love dirty fuzzes and having tested it myself yesterday the MK3 in more extreme settings gives me this fuzzy/'alive' feeling under the fingers. Awesome addition to the QC.
Definitely any tutorials or amp comparisons. You do a really great job of explaining stuff.
Good stuff, thanks. Would love to hear a shootout between your Sampson-era Matchless and the new capture.
Yes. Tutorial of your matchless capture vs their model.
I'm always tryin to find a good edge of breakup tone on the QC...if you need a video idea! Great stuff though, you always help put these updates into context for me
I'm so with you on the auto-assign thing. I Spend too much time turning assigns off!!!
The best just got better. I already captured my DC30 really well so I'm not that interested in that new amp, but I did sell my Chieftain 20 years ago so I dialed that up and I can't leave it alone so I'll get to the rest later. Listening to you play the DC30 now, I definitely like my capture better.
Yeah theyre great additions! I can't imagine id use the model over my captures as well. My DC30 is a sampson era so its got special sauce according to the internet. And Ive got some cool mics. Maybe if theres ever a marketplace I will make a pack
Share your DC30 then 😊
Buy your own@@DjazzStyle
Scene mode is super cool!
I wish the new colors were on the multi assign as well! Very cool
@@SteveSterlacci - I'm pretty exclusively Scene Mode - so this works for me. In your scenario, I can absolutely see where it would be beneficial to have that in Stomp mode as well. How's the overseas tour? Been watching your videos - looks like it's going well!
@davidmock9093 its good to be back home! Have to edit 2 months of vlogs though 😅🤣 i shouldve been editing as we went but was too busy. Thanks for following along 🤘🤘🤘
Good news for QC users. I have an HX Stomp, but I want the makers of Modelers to succeed, and deliver on the promises they made to their customers. The QC has a particularly nice overall design and size, and has tremendous potential. But, they really need to get that unit up to speed on all the important features users need for a productive and enjoyable experience.
Understand something my man, one of the huge benefits of digital profiling tech like this is that you aren't bound by the physical limitations of the amp. So sure, maybe the linear volume pot or the tone selector is *different* in reality, being able to have more throw in a volume pot, or to have the ability to fine tune a tone control is a feature, not a downside.
Does it make it more complex? Yes, but, it's a quad cortex, you're not using it because it's simple, you're using it because it's powerful.
And make no mistake, you can grab a capture of your matchless with the power tubes at 16w/ea, which will destroy them in a few hours, and then play it -forever- on your Quad Cortex, whereas you'd be lucky to lay down a single track with the real amp in that state before you'd have to replace tubes. You also get a full TMB tonestack to play with, which can really make an amp way more versatile than it is in real life. Keep in mind that the whole point of all of this is tone, not absolute numbers for numbers recreations, and you'll do just fine.
You should make this a voice over commercial
I'm glad I purchased the FM9T over this thing.
thank you!
I really get a lot from your content. If you have the time could demonstrate how you dial in your EQ on the qc i really would like to learn how they function. Thank Steve.
Woooow - cool!!!
One thing they've never promised but should've been available since release is MIDI Mapping as they have it on their plugins. And if not that, then it least parameters being assignable to switches since switches are mapped to MID control changes. That they've never had this is why I went for the Helix, and I went for the Helix instead of the FM9 Turbo only because Sweetwater had a very helpful financing option. And no, scenes and snapshots do not provide an alternative when what one wants is variable control over parameters.
What you are using as your audio interface for recording? These tones are great!
Good to see ANY updates from QC but using a FM9 I have zero reasons to use this. I'm sure QC owners will be happier.
Did they update or add any of the Bass profiles?
Massive? Let’s not go overboard….
Would like to see you do a cab sim for captures demo.
Hello everybody
AX8 user here thinking into moving to QC. I know QC sound phenomenal BUT, i love ax8's way of use. One great feature is the XY function that allows me to have two different amps with the same pedals, NO scene mode. I'm old school i don't wanna mess with scenes. Can QC do that with its switching system?
Thank you 🤘
Yes you can multi assign to each block so one can bypass while one engages simultaneously! Thanks for coming around and hanging!
The Quad COrtex is the best !!! you can sound amazing out of the box.. you dont need nothing to sounds and work... the rest is your hand!!!
The auto assign annoys me too. Also, I wish there was an auto option for adding 'abcd' scene option. I always want that ability to assign a block to any scene.
keep waiting for the next update like sardines, wondering maybe this time? when you get a good tube amp you just play, no menues no updates just the best tone known to man : tubes and speakers.
Agree on the auto assign. It's annoying.
Wow this is a lot of stuff! I still haven’t tried one but now I really am interested. Uuuggh being an amp snob…purist makes a pt of this like a foreign language at the same time. Haha
You can have both. My amps come first and pedals. I haven’t had them that long between this year and maybe ten yrs. I still use them. They take pedals beautifully tbh the quad is the closest thing in feel n sound to an amp. I’ve been through all of them except Axe fx. The only other overlooked modeler is the powered Yamaha 100hd double or single modeler. It feels and sounds great too. $800 new again with power.
5:30 that could be because your input gain might be set lower than the real amp would recieve it
I use this guitar with every modeler and never have had to adjust the input gain. It would be quite frustrating having to constantly worry about the input gain on every preset. I think because the amp literally has 0 headroom, they maybe added some? I'll experiment more when I do a side by side with the real one ! Thanks for checking out the video
@@SteveSterlacci The input gain on the QC is global and can not be adjusted per preset.
You're right that it's fair to assume with the default setting it should react like real amps do.
Still I find it useful to play around with a gain block before the amp to sometimes get more or less breakup. Similar to the input gain on their plugins, which I find very useful.
I bought a mission pedal for the QC is the volume setting now global or you have to program 200 presets to get it work?
Does it have analog dry through?? Is it possible to pass the analog signal through it somehow?? Thnxx brother ❤
Steve, I'm sorry to bother you with this here and I also apologize if it seems like I'm making you into my tech support. But here's my thing: In one of your videos you mentioned a feature on the Quad Cortex that could emulate natural feedback instead of using a device like the Digitech Freqout (which is what I use). I can't remember in which video you mentioned it and I can't find any documentation about this feature. Could you help? Did I just imagine you said that or... ?
No worries ! That was added to the helix stuff. You may have seen my video covering the update that added it. So, right topic, wrong unit sorry to say
@@SteveSterlacciThank you Steve. That would explain it. :)
@@RedHeaven yep! Lol thanks for watching either way
@@SteveSterlacci no problem. I enjoy your stuff quite a bit. It's very relevant to me personally and your presentation is excellent.
@@RedHeaven that really means a lot! Thank you so much
Would it make it more appealing than the HX Stomp considering the price difference? I'm currently satisfied by it, but I would like to get a smaller rig, considering I'm using an MC8 controller, Echosystem Delay and a Ventris Reverb to reduce DSP usage...
I like the HX XL better for right now. Always subject to change. Some feel totally opposite and hate the L6 stuff (for no reason tbh). Theyre both great though. Can't go wrong if it's 1 or the other
AxeFx chads stay winning
Ive got a bunch of FM9 content. I dont discriminate
Guitar man/model?
Does a DI capture of a head with separate IR, as accurate as a full rig capture?
Also are their amplifiers the same as their captures? I’m struggling to get clarity on this.
Any improvement with noise? The QC in my experience was really susceptible to electrical noise like crackling and hum to the point I couldn't use in studio recording. Guessing that may just be hardware design.
I realize ur not talking to me but no noise for me.
Neural Plug Ins FINALLY avaiable on the QC????????
Unfortunately, no....
They’re still updating that thing?
What would you do with it?
Still no editor and no plugs..... 3 years 7 months of broken promises.
Hey, "SOOOON". I am with you tho
You would think it was 5 guys trying to develop the next Call of Duty, not an editor for a modeler lol
Just to offer my perspective, as a professional Neural DSP user, I initially got the QC hoping that I’ll be able to run the plugins on it, but I must say that I think in some ways the QC sounds even better (using the built in models) than the plugins. As for the desktop editor- I think the touchscreen is so responsive and fast, I don’t see how it would speed up the workflow. I’ve been using the QC on NBC’s The Voice for a few weeks now (it replaced a giant tube amp and switching system rig) and I’m loving every second!
Just wanted to throw this out there because ultimately only one thing matters- the sound and the feel of the unit, and I think too much focus is placed on superficial things like visuals and branding of specific artists (in the Archetype series). I love and use both the plugins and the QC every day, and I’ll welcome having the plugins on the QC, but the unit, as it is now, is already far superior to anything else on the market, in my opinion. Just remember to enjoy it and PLAY! ❤🤘
@@dorylobel No, the sound is not the only thing that matters and its not about visuals, its about features that make it more useful and convenient, I have heard not one person talk about cool visuals.
@@masterofreality230 sorry, correction- the sound and feel are the only thing that matter to ME, in my own use case (live television performance and recording). I’ve owned every single brand of modeler on the market, but, for me, this is the first product and technology that is not a sonic compromise compared to the best tube amps. To be honest, it might even sound better and more punchy in a mix context, and definitely more consistent than having to worry about aging tubes, bumped microphones, phase issues, noise etc. Out of genuine curiosity- what would a desktop editor offer that you can’t quickly get on the built in interface? All the best!
Release the KRAKEN!
your not either.
No you
that is not huge lol. that is a very small part of what they should have had 3 years ago lol. what a joke.
You're not huge. On a serious note, I agree theyre still years behind and should be held accountable for it. But hey, "soon"