The Future of Cruise Missiles: What You Need to Know
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 сер 2022
- Anti-ship missiles are a large threat to surface ships, which have large radar, radio, and thermal signatures that are difficult to suppress.
Anti-ship missiles are an important part of any country's armed forces armory. These missiles are a huge threat to surface ships, which have very distinct silhouettes whilst sailing around the oceans.
Many of these missiles use a combination of inertial guidance and active radar homing. Some feature infrared homing to follow the heat that the ship is emitting.
For the future, there are multiple options being developed that may soon find their way into the arsenal of many countries.
Join our UA-cam channel by clicking here: bit.ly/3asNo2n
Find us on Instagram: bit.ly/3PM21xW
Find us on Facebook: bit.ly/3t2Huvb
Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/3wQfXzA
Find us on TikTok: bit.ly/3wNsBOu
#engineering #interestingengineering #cruisemissile #navy - Наука та технологія
They showed a Brahmos missile without a warhead strike a ship 3 times, didn't even mention it.
And?
@ that all
They need stock footage showing action to keep viewers interested in an otherwise mediocre video. I saw plenty of ships that were not Moskva getting hit by missiles that were not Neptune.
@@gascan that’s because the Moskva wasn’t hit by a Neptune! The Black Sea Fleet needed a flag-submarine, so they used the Moskva to capture Ukraine’s valuable missile in a special submarine conversation operation.
@@Nunyabizn3ss took my a moment to realize what you meant, made me laugh
most existing antiship missiles are decades old, and the US has opted for the slower sea skimming approach over hypersonic and supersonic higher altitude missiles for many decades now.
Stealthier probably.
Wow! I enjoy seeing your updated information. Thank you very much and keep it up. Very informative and very exciting to see. Congrats.
I thought you gonna explain how the "Anti-ship Cruise Missiles" works from day to day (from the engineering perspectives of course),
but this is just a salesman presentation or high school student presentation
you better learn more about physics first dude before you use that "Engineering" titles
F F >> next! anti-missle cruise ships !
Brahmos supersonic cruise missiles not mentioned!
My favourite series on this channel
The lasted Russia technology in from 1970 . The ship looks great there’s nothing in the heart ❤️.
You’re not making any sense
@@nicholasmupchurch604 Nophoekingway
@@nicholasmupchurch604 mutta Russia
says some idiot on youtube!
To Bad you Attack a country that Made them, so they know the Ship in and out
Brahmos most feared antiship missile
No one fears that thing, I know it makes Indians feel cool about themselves but it has never been combat tested.
@@anthrazite brahmos also known hasis a widow maker by USA
@@prashanth.lgowdas394 Who told you that? It hasn't made any widows yet since it hasn't been tested in combat.
jist like no one believe planes from carrier can sink battleships.
Loitering hypersonic anti ship missile made all surface warship obsolete.
decoy launching to overwhelm would help.the again the high end detection means from eyes in the sky etc would detect before launch
Not really. A lot of systems like the Aegis combat system and the british (forget the name of what they use) are designed specifically for missile saturation attacks.
@@Coinz8 lower cost decoys vs higher end missiles isnt the best yet.we see in the wars hapoening.
I gotta say i never thought I'd be curious about this flying kamikaze salmons
This really proves something, that most "might" is really just hype and ingenuity will always win.
@Interesting Engineering the weather played a significant role in the ships sinking and would have been nice to mention how the moskvas air defences work and how the weather or bad crew training played a significant role in the ships sinking.
As with many cases with Russia, their equipment aren't actually so bad, its the training and organizational structure that fcks them up.
@@sidewinder3422 They had/have the same radar scopes as we used in 1980, to say they are poorly equipped is an understatement, AND their training is terrible because theyre all on short term contracts therefore none of them give a flying...
And they have designated damage control parties that take forever to get to work, while every other navy each sailor is a damage control party first, sailor second. Seen officers on deck putting out fires.
Can you please share how it happened based on what you know ?
Satellite imaging showed calm weather all over the black sea before and during Moskva's sinking, their "it sunk in stormy weather" is complete bs
@@paddington1670 Yeah it's just a huge indecipherable puzzle that the crappy Russian military is crushing the best proxy army NATO ever had.
Argentina almost destroys Royal Navy in 1982 with old bombs and only 5 French Exocet missiles
Russian warship Moskva didn’t have its Radar’s on. So the ship simply didn’t know it had been locked onto and fired at with Anti-Ship missiles. Thus the AK-630 systems never even slewed its turrets to fire.
And we haven’t even talked about hypersonic missiles or the Russian nuclear done torpedo yet 😅
Because those guys are NATO fans.
The Poseidon/Status-6 has a very limited usefulness as an anti ship platform. It's much more a second strike strategic nuclear weapon.
There's no need to, if it's Russian won't work properly, nothing to worry about.
The Royal Navy lost 2 ships and a 3rd put out of action for to ASMs in the Falklands.
The lesson learn was Radar Is Life.
This was proven correct during the Gulf War when a Royal Navy shot down a Silkworm missile with a Sea Dart missile, a task that failed during the Falklands.
Made possible by upgraded radar to guarantee the Sea Dart, a 1960s ramjet powered SAM designed for high flying bombers, remained on target.
Anti ship missiles go back all the way to 1943, where the 3rd reich deployed the Hs293 , which was rocket powered for the first 10 seconds of its flight before gliding into its target.
It claims at least 15 ships sunk or so heavily dammaged, they were scuttled.
Not just anti ship but anti land targets too.
Would not want to be aboard a ship during times of war between the US and China.
India's Bhramos is the best anti-ship missile in the world.
The Houthis just shot one of these at the USS Laboon today. An aircraft took out the missile!
You showed Patriot and THAAD launching (land based air defense systems) while you were talking about platforms which could launch cruise missiles.
The footage is generally misleading.
🤓
Welcome to youtube where any correspondence between the audio and video is purely coincidental 😂
Moskova was not hit by 2 Neptune missile maybe they either more than 2 missiles or maybe only 2 missiles able to hit Moskova rest of the missiles were shot down by Air Defence System
It was hit by two missiles because only TWO missiles were fired.
0:38 the best in 80's?
I love the smell of copium in the morning
Lol 33 seconds in, and this guy literally said "anti-defense missiles"
big ships like a aircraft carrier are sitting ducks for enemy
I dont think an aircraft carrier would supposed to rush straight into enemy line and totally destroyed by it speed and size
That's what aegis systems are for.
No it is not. U.S aircraft also have air defense capabilities such as RIM-162 ESSM and RIM-116 missiles. This whole notion of aircraft carriers navigating the oceans undefended is a bunch of BS and goes to show OP knows absolutely nothing about aircraft carriers and battle groups.
Все буде Украïна 🇺🇦🇰🇿
never mind them Arlee Burkes! theys peanuts mere pocket change! we wanna nail a Super Carrier like the Ford or Reagan... some where around $$ 12 or 13 BILLIONs with crews of 5 500 ! to say nuffin about negating their awesome offensive capability... can you illustrate how thats done?
Does anyone know of any sources and or videos that show the real events that led to the sinking of the Moskwa? There's like a thousand different stories.
Moskva may look formidable in the eye of the world's Navy, but when faced with gallant Ukrainian soldiers armed with Neptune Missile, Black Sea suddenly become the perfect graveyard for the ship and its crew. 🥰🤗🥰
That ship was old as fuck. Hardly formidable
stop your propaganda mate, no ones buying
@@jorgesalinas8506 Neptune isn't on the cutting edge of AShM technology either tho. At least in theory it should have been able to counter such a threat with her short range air defences (Osa and AK-630 CISW).
Wonder wich ship will get
the name Moscow?
That's what happens when you have the Sam's and CIWS in stand by mode. The same happened to a US ship when a iraki fighter launch 2 exocets, they had the ciws in stand by and the Sam's
US and Iraki were allies at the time
@@yizeverienametaken so aliades that one fired two ASM to the ship of the other one
@@ser43_OLDC If only there were some terminology for describing firing on friendlies.
@@yizeverienametaken the only time in wich Irak and us were aliades was after 2015 and the relation isn't the best afterall
@@ser43_OLDC Are you saying the US didn't support Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war?
Ballistic missiles are not sea skimming. They attack from the top
That's not actually footage of moszkva being hit, is it? Can't be.
Well ofc its not actually footage
Brahmos is the best.
You should know... Exocet means anything to you?
New weak, they will talk about the amazing discovery of sonar or maybe gun powder.
5:09
5 meter?????
More like flying Torpedo
Sure , its the go to weapon of choose and only answer for those that like to talk up game changers , and yet fail to see that while each country has developed them , fail to see countries that have built the real answer to them , integrated sensor technology which allows example a carrier strike group to operate under a bubble of sensors and shooters from way over the horizon , seeing beyond their own ships sensors , and engaging targets at maximum range and that includes integrating the likes of the new USAF Raider bomber designed to sit right on the edge of the battle space to deliver long rang munitions ! as for those so called long ranged ship killers, one needs to read up on the technology required to first detect a moving ship at long distance in a vast open space of water, and then engage and finally hit that moving target with major course corrections ??
SM2 ans CIWS are designed for that
Nothing would hurt the russians more than sinking ships. do it ukraine !!!!!
Bro showed a clip of a patriot interceptor launch and called it a Neptune cruise missile
These weapons are what war should be ,trying to out build your adversary,out tech em, nuclear weapons take all the fun and sport outta war.conventional weapons are plenty destructive, without poisoning innocent ppl with fallout.
Many more people would be dead right now if not for MAD.
war isnt "fun" nor is it a fucking "sport".
Seems the russian crew was asleep at the wheel
Well "F" being on any ship.
Why you didn't mention brahmos missile 🇮🇳🇮🇳
Even the best defenses only work when they are turned on.
The US navy learned that when the uss stark was hit by an exocet missile because they didnt activate their defenses.
That's true but there are a few details that I believe are very important.
The ship didn't sink and the jet that attacked belonged to an ally. The US wasn't even at war at the time.
Those Chinese anti ship missiles seem scary af.
Maybe to a small nation navy.
A ship is only as good as its crew.
The crew of a ship has nothing to do with the weapons being used against it n
@@rogerout8875 so clearly you have no idea what you’re talking about. An undertrained crew that doesn’t know when to activate it’s self defense systems is a crew failing. Sure the ship’s systems are indeed a bit dated for modern standards but the ship never even fought back. That’s on the poorly trained crew. Not the ship.
@@boejiden7093 what good is the best crew in the world if they're not equipped to see an anti-ship missile coming right at them?
@@rogerout8875 they were equipped. They were shit trained thats why they didnt even think of looking at their radars
@@boejiden7093 Sources?
Ukraine used the new variant of the missiles it is a homing Missiles and a low flying missile
A new anti ship missile a day keeps the american at bay 🤣🤣
it wasnt actually not Neptune the one which sunk moskova it was Swedish anti ship missile and it was usa awacs that might gave the cordination source " crux news"
Yemen ❤
Moskva is not the best ship air defence in Russian navy , not by any chance.....
It's a cold war relic with old air defence missiles
This is not true! Russians fired thousands of projectiles at me in few seconds from a battleship, all disappeared. But in other situation the weapon can take out any missiles with only few bullets. Fighters can’t do this, the plane would flip over.
Did he even actually explain why the Russians decoys didn’t work and why the ship actually sunk?
Thay have been around for 40 years.
I wonder if Taiwan has any and if so, how many.
They do
Chinese actually named their missile "Dong"🤣
FOR MAXIMUM EMOTIONAL DAMAGE to Woke American soldier rename our Big ASM the DONG.
there is no such thing as best ship if the crew are irresponsible. they are probably drunk because they think no one can sink them because ukraine ships are gone
Get Ukraine a few thousand tomahawks 1500 miles range put ship seekers on em.
By supplying Ukraine with missiles is as good as being involved in the conflict.
Falkland Islands...
Those missile launchers and their operators were operating from a civilian port, making all civilian ports potential targets for Russian artillery. Speaking of targets, where is ukraines navy?
Don't be fool! All came from the US, as well as intelligence.
@@drewh3224 Inshallah, Dong Feng missiles will soon be making all American aircraft carriers into corral reefs.
Russians don't need a reason. Russians attacked Ukraine on February 24, 2022, without reason and without provocation. The Russians are simply shooting at civilians throughout Ukraine. Are there missiles, are there no missiles, Russians don't care. They just shoot.
Ukranians sank all their ships in port when the offensive started.
@@strentole6464 lol okay troll
I am so glad that everyone can now see that Russian army is not even close to be on the same Level as NATO. The only reason why Russians are still present to this day is because they have nuclear weapon. Otherwise, a fee EU countries joined could take care of them, not to mention the US.
Stupid approach. Read more mate
Did you even talk about the topic? There a lot of different missiles, nice.
You didn't really talk about anything with substance at all.
How could they sink the moskva? Why couldn't the Russians defend themselves?
You ask questions but don't really answer anything. Feels like a clickbait video.
P. S. : can you tell us again that there are missiles flying 5m above the sea? You repeated the same information one time in metric one time in ft as if it was something completely different...
No c wis!
wowwww
Moskva is old ship,on cold war technology!!!Rassia have new ships, and they ships don't came in war zone!!! Russian ship is in Caspian sea and have Cirkon rocket and nobody else destroyed this ships!!!
What if this ship sinking is a plot of russia
Doesn’t Russia have CIWS?
AK 630 easily take out this missile. 🤔
Something similar yeah like the Kashtan and AK-630.
I wonder what happened that day and why the defenses failed. Or how many missiles were launched.
@@chanakya5480 Apparently not...
@@dianapennepacker6854 indeed, this makes me question did the ciws even shoot or functional? If so how many missiles were actually shot down? I searched and found nothing that stated moskva ciws during the sinking..
Yes but when you have all the air defense systems in stand by that things happens.
ไต้หวันก็ยังมีตาตรวจการทางอากาศสามารถยิงโต้ตอบการรุกรานของจีนได้อย่างต่อเนื่องโดยที่จีนไม่สามารถทำอะไรได้แม้จะระดมพรมเป้าหมายต่างๆ
Лучшая защита у Крейсера Москва????))) Которому несколько десятков лет??? У вас всё в порядке с головой? Тут стоит старинный комплекс аналог с300 который не расчитан на перехват крылатых ракет. Сам корабль выполнен не по стелс технологии. Одним словом чушь не несите!!!!!😄🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😆😆😆😆😆😆
this was done by america not ukraine
I’m going to McDonald’s does anybody want anything
Шо по русні?
that is NATO weapons not Ukraine
Oh, no, another of these click-bait channels with their not even wrong-narration. Yes, the Moskva sank. Was it directly and immediately due to ASM strikes? No. Poor damage control and stereo-typical Russian incompetence doomed the ship, along with poor weather.
The issue is not the sinking, the issue is how the two missiles able to hit the ship without being intercepted.
Significant number of Soviet scientists and most aerospace facilities are in Ukraine.
so then explain Russia having its own very nice air-force and Ukraine having to beg for F-16s?
@@JeanLucCaptain very nice Air Force? You mean the one that fails to control the sky despite 10: 1 ratio? You mean the one that continues to refurbish Soviet leftovers to pretend to be new technologies? Ukraine was the home of Soviet space programs, missile programs, multiple tank production lines, multiple fighter production lines, majority agriculture production and almost all facilities to build large ocean going military & civilian ships. When the Soviet collapsed, Russia was left with a single tank production line, two single missile production facilities, and two fighter production lines.
5:04 stop repeating these unproven claims.
thats how people grossly overestimate russia and china's capabilities
AS I SAY, RUSSIA VS RUSSIA ITSELF, SOVIET UNION VS SOVIET UNION ITSELF
Very dramatic. LOL
Russian sink it on purpose for their cause no way such an advanced warship gets sunk
😂 who told you it was "advanced"?
Best anti ship missile is Zircon.Your country is incapable of making such hypersonic cruise missiles.Glory to Russian scientist.
The Slava class cruiser was over 40 years old. The crew was rescued.
The Kirov class is the best defended Russian ship. It has Zircon hypersonic anti-ship missiles.
Sources on the crew? That sounds made up to me.
@@rogerout8875 Source: Russia said so
It was laid down 40 years ago but costly modernized multiple times since then. Kirov is kinda useless where it is, it couldn't safely operate anywhere in a war szenario.
@@anthrazite I agree. Big, slow ships, especially carriers, are obsolete in a modern conflict. I would build a navy around subs (armed with SAMs), hovercraft, ground effect vehicles, unmanned vehicles, supersonic combat seaplanes (aka Convair Delta Dart), and drones.
@@ViceCoin They are not obsolete. If they were then china and russia wouldnt be trying to build them. Your subs with sams (which is a dumb idea by the way) would be detected by an orion anti sub plane launched from a carrier to locate and destroy it. Hovercrafts are ESPECIALLY vulnerable to missile fire and aircraft (again, launched from a carrier) nothing you said here is effective.
The first 1 minute was just about licking Ukraine's boots. Any person with above average knowledge about these military topics could've noticed that the first minute was full of unconfirmed and unknown "information" disguised as facts. Please stop no matter which side you're on
the only thing that is really known is that US Intel enabled the strike in the first place and it was never repeated. meanwhile Ukraine has no navy at all.
Yet, the moskva shits at the bottom of the black sea.
@@JeanLucCaptain And the russians BARELY have a navy
6 minutes of nothing...
This video is full of misinformation 🙄🙄
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥🤥
Don't be fool! All came from the US, as well as intelligence.
Nope neptunes are ukrainians missiles. The us isnt the only country in the world with a fonctionning army.
@@killian4934 Harpoons were used, not Neptunes.
And it's *Functioning
@@NukeTelAviv On April 14, 2022, when the cruiser Moskva was destroyed, Harpoon missiles had not yet been delivered to Ukraine. Deliveries of Harpoon missiles began in May. The cruiser Moskva was destroyed by Ukrainian-made Neptune missiles.
@@strentole6464 source?
@@NukeTelAviv Nope even us sources say its Neptune.
English insnt my langage, no need to correct every mistake i make.
Well a lot of bs in that video
Great NEPTUNE missile that sinks powerless low tech warship. 👎👎👎👎👎
Clearly you know nothing about warships 🤣
But that's all Russia has??
Lol, What a Joke , Russia's strongest defense ship destroyed by two minor missiles.... Definitely arm selling game is going on.
Nah number of missile launched which can't hold by ship defense system