Restoring the ottomans to their historical peak in victoria 3

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @mtuumut8400
    @mtuumut8400 Місяць тому +2

    Doing the Nejd war makes sense cuz I can't seem to get grain above 25%. It always gets stuck at 23%

  • @jigioes
    @jigioes 8 днів тому

    Why do you do tenant farming and not homesteading at the beginning?

  • @ikaankeskin7473
    @ikaankeskin7473 Місяць тому

    Great Video! 57:10 you could have gotten double bankroll from UK after declaring on Russia.

  • @No-yp2vo
    @No-yp2vo Місяць тому +1

    nice vid, gdp go up i am happy. construction go up i am happy.

    • @No-yp2vo
      @No-yp2vo Місяць тому

      actually nvm ur budget surplus was too high conner plz construct more and dont hesitate to use auto expands if ur too lazy, still good video but im a little sad😥😓

  • @Mu_Lambda_Theta
    @Mu_Lambda_Theta Місяць тому +2

    If your findings are correct, then this has to be a bug, because:
    1. The *heathen* taxes affect state religion pops as well.
    2. The heathen *taxes* don't go to the government.
    Surely that's a bug, right? No way that's designed to be that way.
    Also, how much exactly do you think the new discrimination mechanics aid the Ottomans? Considering pops with nothing in common with your primary religion can now be brought up to open prejudice with cultural exclusion and favourable religious laws (total separation suffices for non-converted pops in homelands, freedom of conscience suffices for them everywhere). Only sad thing is that even under state religion converted pops in homelands are at 55 acceptance, just 5 away to become second-class citizen and not be considered discriminated by most things (like migration controls etc).

    • @connorvic3
      @connorvic3  Місяць тому +1

      new discrimination is maybe a slight upgrade for ottomans beacuse on cultural exculsion and freedom of conscience you can get them out of the lowest discrimination tier the heathen tax on same religion thing is definetly a bug

  • @No-yp2vo
    @No-yp2vo Місяць тому

    u had to research hydraulic cranes for suez company

  • @TrevorSmithy
    @TrevorSmithy Місяць тому +1

    big nice

  • @pelayla
    @pelayla Місяць тому +1

    L should have done mehmets ambition in victoria 3

    • @connorvic3
      @connorvic3  Місяць тому +1

      what a noob this guy is

  • @earthianspy
    @earthianspy Місяць тому +3

    video starts at 4:10:58

  • @hinkelstein1494
    @hinkelstein1494 Місяць тому +4

    I saw on Reddit that the Channel Companies are all bugged. You need at least five buildings of the 'Channel' type, which is, of course, very silly.
    'I'm sorry, Mr. Investor. We cannot establish the Channel Company because we haven’t acquired enough channels. We need at least five Suez Canals to start this enterprise… nothing we can do…'

    • @dryhad9253
      @dryhad9253 Місяць тому +2

      That's not how it works, the associated buildings are shipyards, not the canal itself (which is why Connor was talking about them).
      The actual bug here is that Laissez-faire lets you buy private buildings instead of using state owned buildings - but it *only* lets you buy private. Connor had 5 state owned shipyards in the target state but only one privately owned one.

  • @Coconut-marcus
    @Coconut-marcus Місяць тому

    neat