WATCH OUT! Anti Braking Cameras to Fine You for Slowing Down!!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 вер 2024
- How can there be a law against braking or slowing down? And yet there are reports that anti-braking cameras might be deployed in the UK!
Please subscribe/follow
UA-cam: www.youtube.co...
And follow all my channels linktr.ee/brow...
If you enjoy my content, there are really easy ways to show your support
Channel membership: www.youtube.co...
Buy me a Coffee! ko-fi.com/brow...
Patreon - / browncarguy
🙏🏽☺️
Big Thanks to
AutoExotica (AutoExotica.com)
CraftLab (www.CraftLab.my)
Tom Conway-Gordon ( tconwaygordon)
Marc Waddell ( elocutus55)
Shaheer Hakki
Reza Adil ( Alizarde.Cigars)
Mohammed Qasim (wehms.com)
Salman Hussain ( szhus13)
TheCaffeineGTShop (caffeinegt.com)
Muhammad Ali Haji ( behindthewheel.life)
Please subscribe to my channel for more videos like this - and make sure you hit the bell icon to switch on notifications.
---------------------------
Brown Car Guy
#gatso #trafficcamera #speedingcamera #brakingcameras #antibrakingcameras #braking #driving #roadsafety
#car #cars #carblogger #carjournalism #motoring #automotive #carinfluencer #carguru #carguy
not allowed to accelerate, not allowed to brake. All we're allowed to do is sit in traffic and pay multiple different road user charges
@spanishjohn. That’s because we are British. We do what our abusers tell us and we form an orderly queue to take the instructions. We really must ask what our friends only 20 miles across the channel would do.
Don't worry, the board game will be out just in time for Christmas. You'l be able to play in your front room, so no need to even use your car.....
People are becoming Incensed with Authority, Authority is beginning to make a rod for its own back if it doesn’t smell the coffee ! There’s enough evidence around that The Coffee is boiling over, Just my opinion,
Stupid and ridiculous, which means they will implement it!
@@barryhill1044 we need a revolution out of this eco gulag, it's gone way too far already.
So the war on motorists i.e. the easy target, continues. No one can tell me otherwise.
These can't be legal. I would definitely challenge a penalty notice in court.
@johnb3141. What can they do if you refuse to pay ? Put you in prison ? It costs £412 pound a day for every day you spend in prison ! That’s £ 7 days at £412 = £ 2884.
They will do everything possible to avoid that being the outcome, just my opinion,
@@barryhill1044Like most motoring offences, it won't involve prison it'll be points and a ban.
They are counting on people who will just pay up.
Me to
Like the covcon fines, fine everyone in sight,and see what sticks, many won't pay, --- some will.
they are so low down they will be far easier for the Bladerunners and other people to closely inspect them
haha your right
they may need cleaning etc
@@acidtechno pmsl
Wear stealth attire, Armed with a tyre and Jerry's can.
@@CarlSab9088 belter lol
Sadly there are too many corrupt people in Westminster. Money, money, money. Anyway, Brown Car Guy thank you for bringing this to our attention. And if you ever see a Politician crossing the road, don't put your brake on. 👍
So we'll now be holding motorists to a 100% perfect standard. Good job our Police, Councils and Government meet similar high standards.
Touché! 🤣
Braking is not perfect standard driving. Acceleration sense is and smooth braking. This does not stop progressive braking it stops sudden braking which is 99.9% the cause from bad observation and forward planning. The .1% of sudden braking is absolute emergency
I'd like to see a scenario where us, the voting/taxpaying public, can hold the Government to a 100% perfect standard. I'm not sure how we'd go about it, given the shambolic, law breaking behaviour of the Government we have now..... We'll pass judgement on these cameras at the ballot box next year........ I'm voting for the Monster Raving Looney Party, because it seems the only way to actually get what you voted for.....
Government in the UK have never been Lower quality
@@cameronleehoraceNo the braking is from perfect observation, I'm trundling along at 30 in a 20, when I see a camera I brake, no speeding tickets yet.
What happens when a person steps in front of you - are you supposed to just run over them and then say sorry but you can't afford another fine.
That's the lovely atomised socirty socialists crave!
You will get the option - either pay the fine for potentially saving a pedestrian and other road users or prison for abiding by the DVLA rules
Only if it's a parliament member or Kahn. You will be find if you hit him and don't repeat the action several more times.
Hi I would like to tell you about a law you may not have heard of ". The little signs that show a picture of a camera to warn of speed cameras, is always edged black. Which means the camera is void". As the law says it is to be red edged". I'm a registered lantra traffic operative " and that is the law. Also the vans can be called out as un lawful if they park where they want". It has to be a home office approved speed check site so no tickets are valid if the law is not followed. , I also know how you all can never get a ticket even if caught if you ask the right question ❓❓ to the office. Iv never seen a red edged cam sign. And have used it in two speeding court appearances , and the judge and police. And lawyers didn't know the law exists ". How many have paid fines and had points" without knowing this law. "
@@kaiwenwu1947 entire nation of cucks.
The good work of the blade runners needs to be extended to all cameras…
Braking cameras... so you're not allowed to speed now you're not allowed to slowdown, if you see a camera, you are supposed to just run through them at an illegal speed over the given limit, because now you are not allowed to brake if you see a speed camera, yet again solid proof as if proof was needed tbh, speed cameras, ULEZ and all that are "just" about draining the motorists pocket, because we are an easy soft target.
But isn't the point that you would have had to be going over the speed limit in the first place to "just run through them at an illegal speed over the given limit"?
It's about more than legalised larceny ... they want everyone to be carless ... it helps their totalitarian control agenda.
I slowly clicked the 'like' button just in case of any new "like button speed clicking detection" law that may come into effect in a few months time.
🤣🤣🤣
😂😂. Love it! A bit of humour is incredibly important especially in these times 👍
I've just hit it 👍13 × times for good luck. 👍 😊
In my area they have been using countdown signs to let you know that the speed is changing from 40 to 30, this is to stop drivers from doing 40 right to the sign, they went to trial an idea like these cameras to catch people braking heavily in to 30 zones and the only drivers caught were the police
is that real ?
Yes it was a trial to see if they could justify using these new cameras, the whole idea is that they want to place them at speed limit signs. I think the offence would be driving without due care and attention
In the Advanced Driver course, I was trained to slow before reaching a lower limit speed sign, not on reaching it. But unless the lower limit is written on the road surface the roadside sign can be hidden by a parked truck etc.@@IanJLennard
So they want to charge people for being reasonable ......typical!
I’ve come across those on some roads in various English counties, but they also been used on parts of the M4 in Wales, for many years, as far back as 3/4 mile. They don’t use countdown markers, like approaching slip lanes, just blue signs with a standard speed limit sign accompanied by relevant text (in both languages). Those were actually non-compliant with normal standards for the Road Sign Assistance RSA) kit in some cars, so that they display the wrong value early. They only recognise the standard symbols, not text in any language that overrides it! Here’s an example on Google street view: www.google.com/maps/place/Newport/@51.5763329,-3.7546159,127a,35y,326.76h,45t/data=!3m1!1e3!4m6!3m5!1s0x486e1e131ca04b95:0x495c163a920de244!8m2!3d51.584151!4d-2.997664!16zL20vMDF4cjZ4?entry=ttu Note that this lot is often well out of date, notwithstanding their quoted dates on the bottom of the display.
Let the blade runners be an inspiration to us all, treat all spy cameras with the same contempt, they make a real funny noise when they crash to the ground
Obviously Sunak's 117 "special advisers"have run out of ways to tax us and see this as ,yet another,cash cow.
He has to afford the billions he's spending on other Countries somehow.
Oh there's plenty for the Gov to go at yet - Opening your car door tax, putting your keys in the ignition tax, putting your car heater/air con on tax, carrying friends and family tax..............etc, etc, you get the picture
Almost ALL of the new legislation passed / new tech installed over the last 5+ years has NOT been about making the roads safer. So this is no different.
It has been about making car ownership as stressful, joyless, expensive and inefficient as possible, in the hope that people will simply give up their cars.
For too long motorists have been the easy target when it comes to raising revenue but, as with ULEZ, we are now (finally) starting to see some push back!
Yes this typical WEF agenda shit, and it is 100 times worse now in UK after you got a WEF cult member as PM. Here in Norway we are sadly not far behind... WEF wants to ban all private car ownership and there is l cities they have planned to implement it in soon.
Agree tottally
I do agree, they're making driving so expensive and such a chore, that people just give up, and yet the car ads still show smiling drivers in totally empty cities with no congerstion or traffic lights racing along. Even better, EV's out in the middle of nowhere going off-road or driving through a desert, which absolutely cracks me up.
Here in Canada, we're living in a dystopian nightmare. All we can do is take solice in the fact we're not alone.
I like what Mexico did to thier mayor.
Maybe you can hang on until the elections and throw the idiot out.
It is all across the Western world as the communists take over more institutions . They don't call themselves that anymore but , that is what they are , they are not "liberals"
Hang on in there mate, Trudeau isn't invincible, just vote wisely, good luck from Britain.
What kind of crap is happening there mate ??
I haven't seen any mention in the highway code about the use of brakes being illegal, so how could they possibly prosecute anyone for using them???
Because that’s what brakes are for right ??
Unless they can somehow regulate the situations and scenarios where you may need to brake, I just don;t see how this can be enforced or policed.
@@Brian-om2hhApparently they detect sharp braking, so they will stop what every sensible driver does.
Ignore the limit and drive to the road/weather conditions, brake for the speed cameras, then get up to a sensible speed again.
There is also talks about removing the speed limit fresh-hold, you can see where this is going.
Exactly the same as ULEZ Shite. How can you be penalised for entering any zone once your car has passed a valid M.O.T. if your vehicle didn't meet the standards, it wouldn't pass an M.O.T. ...😉
SCAM!
I heard about this. These scameras look quite low down. If this comes to fruition, all I'm saying is they won't last long.
bad enough doing 20 but anti brake cameras , its mental all greed, great info bro
There are speed cameras in a 50 mph limit near me 3 of them , you can be doing 50 mph and the car in front slams on because they see the camera and dont know the speed limit so they brake to 30 mph it happens more often than you would think.
This annoys me daily. I travel along several 50mph roads into work, and the amount of idiots doing 30 just astounds me. No one can read a speed sign, or they are just so slow witted anyway and their brain cannot see more than 15 feet in front of them.
And you don't follow too close to them, so it's only an annoyance. Perhaps they need a 50 sign at the camera?
I think it's time to start making number plates unreadable
Similar happens on Revenue road in Lucan, Dublin. A motorway posing as a dual carriageway with a ridiculous 80 kph limit. Most drivers do about 90kph on it and some outliers get up to 100kph. All drivers brake harshly to 50kph when they see a speed van parked up on a corner near one of the junctions, conveniently parked behind some overgrown bushes to catch the unwary.
Other idiots on the other side behind a concrete barrier slow down to have a gawk confounding things further. This odious practice is known as rubbernecking and has caused many collisions on Irelands motorways and dual carriageways.
I do not know if the van catches many victims but the sea of redlights from people braking harshly in over reaction is a dead give away to aspiring speed merchants.
@@jgdooley2003That road should be 100kph but they need the €€€
Can you setup a petition to have them banned before their introduction?
Yes , slowing down by using pedestrian releases fewer particulates into atmosphere than using brakes .
😲🤦🏽♂️🤣
"It was either Dorris or everyone's lungs. That's why a drove over her your honour"
Pedestrians are 18% carbon.
@@stepbackandthink The latest in carbon capture technology.
Major road works on M1 near Dunstable had average speed camera installed. This of course was an attempt to stop those who ignored the roadworks speed limit and braked hard for the ordinary speed cameras. The rumor going around is the average speed cameras caught so many drivers, the fines collected were more than the construction costs. If that's the case I'm sure the local authority wanted the cameras to stay.
Pointless tech when average speed cameras already cover this
These are perfectly designed for the objective of gathering vast quantities of cash. If, on the other hand, SAFETY is the objective anything that slows people down is a good idea. Absolutely no need for any fines!
It’s another chance for out of control public authorities to catch us out for a minor misdemeanour and grab some of our money.
I did about a 100 mile car journey for work the other day but never again! I’ve realised I took 100’s of chances of trial by camera of getting fines, points on my licence and ending up with a higher insurance premium.
So they fine you for speeding and they want to fine you for slowing down to keep the speed limit?
So no matter whether you speed or slow down you pay a fine, next one will be because you are using a car, Oh they already did that one in ULEZ !!
Been hearing more and more the conspiracy theory that they want privately owned vehicles off the road and the more stuff like this that happens the more im believing this theory.
Words not to use if your not in trade. Vehicle (trade). Driver/operator (trade) and many more . This is how they get you. The police will use entrapment to take you from Public to trade.
WEF lackeys
Governments see cars as a necessary evil to enable people in remote areas to work and as a tool for increasing economic activity and generating more taxes.
It will come to pass in time that rural areas will not allow people to build houses and become car dependent unless they have a genuine reason to live in a rural area such as being a farmer etc. This is current county council policy in many counties in Ireland where moves are in place to push people into towns and cities and allow for the introduction of public transport. Once this is done cars will be taxed so heavily and ICE cars will be banned from sale. Most ordinary people will be forced onto busses and have to endure all the inconvenience and delays that entails.
Already Irish government policy is to limit car-parking spaces in workplaces and offices and workers are TAXED as a benefit in kind if such spaces are provided by their workplace. This has caused endless problems for nurses on shift work outside the normal operating hours of public transport and for people in the bar and hospitality sector who also work odd hours.
A current policy in urban local government circles is the Orwellian sounding " active transport options", good old fashioned walking or cycling. Good for young fit people with no goods or tools to carry but useless for anyone else.
In short, yes governments hate cars and want rid of them ASAP.
Welcome to the real world NEO... :)
No they just want poor people off the road. Then the rich can drive around with no traffic.
It's a pre - speed-camera speed-camera. It can only work by continuously monitoring your speed when in range and calculating the change over a time interval' i.e. the deceleration. The assumption being that you were / could have been / speeding before you saw the camera. Almost a presumption of guilt ...
I would hope that the cameras can tell the difference between a person speeding, then harshly braking to avoid being caught, and being already at the speed limit and doing the same thing for the purpose of an emergency (eg. a child runs in front of your car), I'm just nervous about having to appeal something like that, and taking it to court. The government doesn't have a great track record on using appropriate discretion for stuff like this (case in point: using a bus lane to let an emergency vehicle past).
Of course, they are there purely to catch those sensible drivers who ignore the low limits and brake at the camera, then accelerate off again.
They won't be triggered to go off unless you are over that arbitrary 20mph limit.
I have ONLY gotten speeding tickets from these speed cameras when I was 100% sure I was not speeding, so now I have developed the habit of breaking and slowing down at least 20km/h every time I see one of those cameras even if I am 100% sure I am not speeding. When I am actually speeding I have never gotten a fine from the speed cameras because I slow down when I see them, also best place for speeding is where they have the speed cameras because then there will be no cops doing speed checks lol :)
Why not let the emergency vehicle use the bus lane if it's clear.
That's the issue. They know it's going to be painful for the innocent motorist to appeal and potentially costly and stressful but they don't care. It's using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
Around here deer often run into the road. It's not possible not to break strongly in such circumstances- and vehicles several in the line will also break even tho they haven't seen the deer themselves. When I did advanced driver training it was drummed in that you drove defensively as unpredictable things can happen at any time. Penalising breaking - whether at the site of a speed camera or not is just outright dangerous.
Better be careful. You might get charged with eating a kit kat whilst driving.
You state breaking the way you spell it is as if something is breaking and not as if you are braking to slow down be aware of correct grammar.
@@andrewcarter504 autocorrect messes with my responses (even this one - it put either where I put with). You are welcome to nitpick UA-cam anytime, be my guest.
I see that as a form of entrapment, a ridiculous situation. I would be tempted to strip all cameras of the road at this rate, another money making scam.
No doubt Mp's will just ignore anyone who complains.
And it’s people like you that are making this country worse and worse to live in. Entitlement to think you can go around vandalising and doing criminal damage just because you disagree with something. Get some eduction and deal with situations with diplomacy and words
Oh come on!!! Can't do anything now! 🤦♂️
What are they gonna say next, we can't open our window?
Yes, also you're only allowed to wear pink on Wednesdays
Take out the brake light bulbs.
A quote from future me, in court defending my actions. "Of course I was breaking harshly your honour. Didn't the camera pick up the baby squirrel that jumped out in front of me? Is it now a crime not to fight against our life preserving instincts and if it is, what does that mean for child safety?" CASE DISMISSED!
The judge, "well they only trigger if you are travelling over the speed limit in the first place so..."
@@eyesodd You don't have an proof of this. It is however evident by your comments, that you sir, are a bootlicker!
That wouldn’t work as if you read the Highway Code you would find that only an animal that is large enough to cause damage to the car and cause danger to you or your passengers would be a valid reason to do an emergency stop as risking other drivers lives is far more dangerous. The baby squirrel is expected to be ran over if it’s unsafe to stop as driving a car safely is always deemed the most important.
Try explaining that to a squirrel 😂😂@@cameronleehorace
It's getting totally ridiculous now
These cameras look quite low down to the ground. A bin liner could, errrm, blow over them, for example.
Accidentally get chopped down.
well done and thanks dude for bringing this to light, keep up the good fight. Bless you.
They'll get treated just like the ULEZ cameras. And hopefully it'll spread to all speed cameras & ANPR cameras too. This surveillance state nonsense has to go!
If you do not speed, drive with insurance, wasn’t a criminal, had a good level of driver training past the standard driving test then you would have no worry with ANPR, speed camera, braking camera or any type of camera. They exist for road safety and the benefit of our police force to do their jobs. The only ANPR that shouldn’t exist is in car parks.
@@cameronleehoracewhat an absolute brainwashed 🥾👅
@@cameronleehorace You might like living in an open prison, but many of us don't. We are the 2nd most watched & tracked nation, next to China in the world. And I would also go further by banning all doorbell cameras from capturing footage off the property also. The state has sod all right to know my whereabouts (due to me not being up to no good). Get more, better coppers & have decent sentences for crimes & watch criminality & lawlessness drop. That old nonsense about 'if you're doing nothing wrong, you've nothing to worry about' is laughably, ridiculous & lazy thinking. It's thinking like that, that will march us all in to a techocratic nightmare in the near future!
Robbing motorist time time after time high way robbery they don't want cars on the road I'm waiting for it to go down to 10mph or 15mph you wait
It will , and a man with a flag !
Average speed cameras as we see in roadwork areas are better I guess, there is no definition in the Highway Code that I am aware were it states braking is an offence except doing so is dangerous.
Agreed. On M25 gantry cameras, the traffic is so heavy that they don’t even need average speed checks.
Remember the line the Govt/councils rolled out a few years ago, "speed caneras will only be out in place of accident blackspots"?
Note they are talking about removing the speed limit fresh-hold limit aswell!
Pleased to say hardly any ulez cameras left in my area functioning, hopefully these new cameras will meet the same fate.
I have been guilty of that, I have slammed on the breaks because the light turned yellow on a camera intersection to not risk getting a $400 fine. I didn’t have time to check if I was going to get rear ended. I tended to avoid any intersections that had cameras.
If you had to slam on when the lights turned yellow you were very in the wrong. You know you can go through on yellow right? If it’s too dangerous to stop you go through.
@@cameronleehorace the company that serviced the lights and made a profit from it tweaked the timing of the yellow so if it didn’t turn yellow over your head you couldn’t make it, it would turn red before you got out of the intersection so either you floored it (if there was no one ahead of you) or you slammed on the brakes. They were a predatory company, my wife got a $450 ticket for making a legal right hand turn because the camera said she didn’t come to a complete stop. You couldn’t fight the tickets and were guilty without a way to prove you were innocent. Going to court got you $100 off.
It sees you speeding before you get to the speed camera. Two cameras facing both ways.
These are being rolled out. They sit on the top of a pole with four small camera for both lanes in each direction.
Occasionally I have to brake quite suddenly for a pothole as CWAC has more potholes than decent roads these days 😡
When people start running into each other for fear of getting a "Harsh Braking " ticket, this lunacy will then be replaced with other lunacy.
I just rented a 73 Plate Corsa. It bleeped when it thought I was braking late. Bleeped when I approached a speed hump thinking its a car in front. It knows the speed limit on each road and the icon flashes when I'm over. Bleeps if I change lane without indicating (tho I never witnessed that)The rental company can collate this data and work out who's a regular speeder and late at braking and charge or ban accordingly.
I think it's to make sure you brake early so you don't create excess brake dust cause of the environment/climate BS.
Stop buying cars with computers
what is the name of the rental place?
@@C...G... Enterprise Rent a Car.
it amazing what a handy tool a 36v grinder is ,just saying, great tool ,everybody should have one :)
One day they'll make them really quiet just for this purpose.....
a van with some cutting equipment in the back should do the trick! 👍
I don't think this will come to pass. The public has had enough of this persecution now and they won't stand for it.
When it comes to the war on the motorist, nothing surprises me anymore.
What next?! Fined for breathing as you are emitting too much co2!
Bet your life the will find something to do with that
The idea is that, as you are having to brake as you get to a speed camera, you were speeding and, by braking, you are avoiding tripping the speed camera.
It works by detecting the front of the vehicle dipping, so if you brake by hualing on your handbrake, then the system is defeated.
take the break bulbs out. what's next tomorrow?
Exactly
hopefully the blade runners will continue the good works by adding these to the arsenal!!!!
United Kingdom - Land of the "you cant" "your not allowed" and plenty of "No"
The cameras don't just detect people who slam their brakes on. The system has a radar detector before the actual speed camera and will clock you for speeding as you approach the camera. You will be clocked for slow braking as well if you were exceeding the limit when detected by the radar.
The attack on the motorist continues
it sounds to me that if you heavy break, before a camera, then they assume you were speeding
Yeah but if you are not caught speeding then you have not been speeding.
Assumption has no basis in law. Proof is the only way to successfully prosecute.
The only thing I think they could possibly get you on is "driving without due care and attention" 🤔. But goodness knows how the threshold for this can be fed into these new cameras? A bit like the proposed "noise cameras" - too many variables for an effective prosecution?
I believe what they are hoping for is for most innocent motorists to just take the points and not go through the rigmarole of fighting it in court.
So instead of watching out for harsh breaking near speed cameras, you'll get semi-random harsh breaking just before the detection range of the new camera, probably also multiple guesses which will be much safer all round.
Curious, but like it said in the video, there is as yet no legal basis to penalise braking. So we don't have to worry yet.
Brake dust tax is coming
They will use the excuse that hard braking riskes rear end accidents so it must be stopped. The nanny state wants to protect you.
They will argue this by saying that hard braking can reduce the safety of an incoming traffic behind, or how a driver can lose control during hard braking and cause an accident. Anything to squeeze more money out of us...
Missing the point.
It's to stop all us sensible drivers doing what we all do, driving to the limit, braking for the camera, then accelerating up to a sensible speed again.
So no there is no legal basis for braking, but they are framing it as if to say there is no speeding allowed what so ever, so if you were within the limit you wouldn't need to be braking in the first place.
@@eyesodd It's not for a government or a camera to say whether I need to brake or not. It's not illegal to defend your self against a speed trap. This is insanity. SO what YOU are sayin if I inadvertently go to fast, it is now illegal to slow down so I don't get caught, that is pure craziness. SP because you went to fast, you are FORCED to drive in to the speed trap and get prosecuted. Crazy.
I have braked suddenly many times simply because a camera appeared out of the blue. Then realised I was ok anyway. Sect from 30 to 20 suddenly. I am a Nervous driver after 45 years of 50,000 a year as a service engineer. You learn to be careful, but a nervous wreck in the latter years due to cameras. Now retired. Wife does most driving now and worried she may get her first ticket in 30 years of driving. This is now designed to catch those who have avoided in the past. I do 15 mph now to make sure. Car is not designed for 25 mph or less on certain rds. Use to do 25 in a 30 zone as I had been caught 3 times at 33 mph. Never sped deliberately. It's always accidental as I was thinking about my next customers problems., that way I spent less time on the job.
I thought the idea of average speed cameras was to stop speeders going fast, breaking when they see a camera. This seems a bit off. whats next, a camera that fines you because your indicator lights blink too fast or too slow?
You know if the Vulcans ever did make first contact, they would think "ok this an illogical planet" and turn around at warp.. hopefully setting all all the cameras to breaking point on the way
All cars will have the inbuilt GPS monitored by the authorities and they'll charge us per mile, fine us for tail gating in bumper to bumper traffic, fine us for running a yellow, fine us for driving tired, fine us for accelerating too hard and braking too hard, fine us for having old tyres, fine us for not having the car serviced, fine us for parking too long at timed bays. They will use the abolition of petrol and diesel and the taxes we paid and apply these new crimes to electric cars where all the monitoring tech is built in.
I got fined in Thailand because my horn wasn't the correct pitch!
@@kingrobert1st I visited Thailand a few times for work, most of our staff there were ex-pat Brits. Each of them, even in taxis, get pulled over several times a year for non-existent offenses with on the spot fines to pay. It's a tax the police put on the public , especially foreigners.
Hmm. Isn’t that corruption? Cash in hand to the old bill and if you don’t you’ll be reported, perhaps.@@peterschmidt1453
Think the time has come for us all to get more involved with stopping this madness and persecution of the motorist.
I’m not a lawyer but I think there is a case of presumption of speeding here since you would only brake sharply if you were driving over the limit and braked sharply to avoid triggering the camera whilst going through the detection zone.
Seems ludicrous to me but then I’m not a blood sucking money grabbing politician whose only original idea is to screw the motorist even further in new and interesting ways. 🤔
In about April 1989, driving from Adelaide to Melbourne, a journey I made regularly for about 15 years, I was stopped for speeding just near Ararat, in the middle of nowhere, in Victoria. When I pointed out the revenue raising aspect of the whole operation, that is to deliberately keep the penalty for minor infractions to an “affordable” level, I received a shocking reply from Constable F.H. The good Constable said “YOU ARE RIGHT SIR AND IF I COULD GET A JOB OUTSIDE THE FORCE THAT PAID THE SAME MONEY, I’D LEAVE. How’s that for honesty? Oh and I had a witness in the car who mentioned the event a few years ago.
😲
Lots more rear end shunts that's going to be great for road safety 😂
Simple. Drive in the distance seem to be clear and not drive too closely. On a drive I never usually need to keep touching my brakes like the majority of drivers seem to. It’s all down to observations and defensive driving will allow you to be protected no matter if there are brake cameras or not.
I used to be a transport driver and it was common for veicles to 'surf' the lights. What I mean is, abiding by the speed limit when passing through the speed camera but speeding up between the speed cameras. Average speed cameras were supposed to address this issue. Obviously this is to deal with 'stand alone' cameras.
This is utter insanity!
This would be an interesting case for the courts. Where is it legislated that you are not allowed to brake harshly?
Revenue , revenue. Eventually they will impose so many new crimes on drivers people will not want to or afford to drive. All the working poor will be pushed into robo taxis or public transport, except for the rich of course.
Exactly. Only the rich will be driving around on trafficless roads
The way it was when cars were first invented, toys for only the rich.@@aries6776
We don't want anti breaking cameras, we want to see cameras breaking.
I got fined for watching this on X2 speed.
🤣🤣🤣
Can we have an autobahn in the uk where you can actually drive your car to the speed that you want 😂😂
That’s in the Isle of Man
@@cameronleehoraceNot that many areas if my recent holiday there was anything to go by!
i hope they get destroyed .
Can they detect the cat/fox/deer/hedgehog that ran out in front of you? No? Then they'll cost more in court proceedings as people challenge any fine (or points). Don't pay! Contest, contest, contest!
Another job for the bladerunners
For all citizens.
There would have to be a change to primary legislation - Act of Parliament - to make this an offence. The cameras would have to be approved to be reliable and don't forget that the normal speed camera requires the white marks to allow a review by a human so that they can operate unmanned.
BUT here is some very important news. On the A217 in Surrey south of Woodhatch near the Bee Hive pub is a new type of speed camera that does NOT use flash. And neither does it use the normal visible white marks - they are pairs of small squares that are easy to miss. The camera is up high has a ULEZ type camera as well as something else. My nephew went through it and is waiting to hear but the internet says that it is functioning. Look at it on Streetview. Never seen one before. Anyone else seen one??
I've got a mate who lives in Cornwell. He's been caught out and fined for slowing down? When will this war on private vehicle ownership end? When we're all locked inside our 15-minute cities where we'll own nothing and be happy, perhaps? Which begs the question how will these councillors and top council directors get their pensions topped up from? A new local death tax perhaps. Oh wait that's happened already, in a way, given how much private companies charge to lay someone to rest! Providing someone continues to keep paying!!
Yet wandering into the the middle of the road on foot, half cut and looking at your phone, hood up, totally oblivious to everything around you ... totally legal!
My sentiments entirely tom. The amount of idiots walking head down with eyes glued to a screen is frightening BUT heyho it's the drivers fault as the highway code told me I can do that. We seriously need jaywalking laws enforcing in the UK. If you don't cross on a designated pedestrian crossing £100.00 instant fine.
New cameras to chop down then.
May have to take out the 'brake light bulbs' too.
😂
Cordless Saw and Angle grinders sales up
They record harsh braking so recognise a vehicle exceeding the speed limit, by the amount of deceleration, and to stop you speeding up, it measures your time to get to the next camera further up the road.
This defies logic and rational thinking. We need to ask whether these people want to promote safety or make driving more dangerous.
Harsh braking because you see as yellow box is driving without due care and attention. At all times when driving it is the drivers responsibility to recognise the speed limit and to be aware of how fast you are travelling. Anything less than this is inattentive driving and it's quite legitimate to try and reduce the numbers of people willing to drive their cars in such a manner.
i know it doesn't get foggy much nowdays, but would these cameras think fog lights are brake lights. 4 quid switch on the dash on and off at your leisure, as long as nobody in their audi on the phone is behind you playing bingo.
What if you have a heavy load in a van the weight transfer itself will make the vehicle dip naturally and in some cases enhance the “dip” of the vehicle. They should be called BROKE CAMERAS and we all know why, what a joke
Nothing’s unbreakable … the titanic was unsinkable 😂
If you ever go to Heathrow airport, you’ll notice the speed limit is 40 in the surrounding areas. Google Maps and Apple Maps says “50” for some reason.
But within a few feet, it rapidly changes to 30 and there’s a camera. They lie to people. I’ve never seen a city behave more criminally.
Brake harshly for a hazard like a pedestrian, animals, fallen trees, but carry on at said speed if it's a just stop oil protestor in the road.
So if somebody runs across the road in front of you, near these camera's, don't brake, just run the risk of running them over then.
they added a mass of red light cameras in downtown Chicago and they created an epidemic of rear end accidents from people braking hard to avoid the red light camera and getting rear ended.
Blade runners you know what to do, we need chapters everywhere. We need to fight back now, this just a war on the motorist so we need to take the war to them. Motorists you need to stand for your local councils and take them over and stop this nonsense.
I hope they done a risk assessment and informed their insurance company for liability insurance. There's two types of road users :trade and Public. Public owns the highway and pays for the upkeep. Trade have to pay to use the Public highways. They have just put all highway users under trade. Read the law.
Next time the car in front brakes suddenly, I'll just run into the back of it, and tell my insurance company I thought they were braking for an anti-braking camera ahead. 😊
The uk law states that speed cameras MUST be painted brightly so they are visible to avoid harsh breaking when spotted later if dull
So theyll use the basis of that I suppose.
I dont agree with it btw but i thought id point that out for ppl who dont know
NO WAY!
When you drive 60 mph at 40 mph limit and you hit the break on the measuring line, the camera speed detection fails because you suddenly change the speed from 60 to 30 in a second as the speed detection calculation will be inconsistent. These new cameras have more precise detections because they measure more frequently. Nothing to do with breaking ...
Best way to deal with those cameras is DONT SPEED , STICK TO THE LIMIT
I find it difficult sticking to 20 mph on my bicycle.
At least someone with some sense. Also only drive where you can STOP IN THE DISTANCE SEEN TO BE CLEAR. All this is a load of fuss over nothing. If you don’t speed. Stick to speed limits. Don’t follow too closely and have a good level of driving skill you would not need to worry about these cameras. @midge225
As the video explained many times innocent non-speeding people just instinctually brake even when they aren't speeding because they think they've missed a speed limit change.
This would make no sense. In the UK, cameras are (said to be) in place for safety purposes i.e. to make people slow down in that area. An anti braking camera is the opposite of that, highlighting that even if you think you're speeding then DON'T slow down. On that basis I don't see them ever coming to the UK, when the government wants speed to be enforced over a long distance then they use average speed cameras.
Here's how you break the braking camera:
1 - have a dashcam record your driving
2 - drive towards the braking camera close (but below) the speed limit
3 - if safe to do so, brake harshly when approaching the speed camera
4 - get a fine
5 - appeal and win because you actually didn't break any laws
6 - now they're useless.
The most effective speed cameras are the one that are on the motorways that have 2 cameras and calculate your average speed from point A to B.
How long before your car is automatically restricted to the prevailing speed limit? Not long I suggest. However, thinking again, there wouldn't be any money in that, so maybe not.
I agree. The technology is already here. A family member has a car that can observe speed limits and change lanes by itself. It's just the current UK legislation that restricts it to just motorways.