The 6600 non-XT is the real champ of the rx 6000 series, along with the 6700 non-XT and 6800 non-XT. They are very efficient for their performance tier and the prices were great too once the mining died down.
They’re all memes, we can’t even get 1080p 60 on games now (no upscalling doesn’t count) both AMD and NVIDIA are scummy and so are the publishers that enable these dev teams to shit out horrible code where resolution and performance is heading backwards relying on AI to perform decently
@@GregoryShtevensh Nope the 4070 has a die size of 224mm^2 cut from 294mm^2. The rtx 3050 has a die size of 197mm^2 cut from 276mm^2. The gtx 1650 has a die size of 200mm^2 The gtx 1650 super(basically the Ti) has a die size of 237mm^2 So if anything it's actually between a 50 and a 50Ti class card. The rtx 4060 is a 40/30 class card. Here is how it goes: The rtx 4060 is a 30/40 class card, marketed as 60 class card sold for 60 class prices The rtx 4060Ti is a 50 class card, marketed as a 60Ti class card sold for 70 class prices. The rtx 4070 is a 50Ti class card, marketed as a 70 class card, sold at 80 class prices. The rtx 4070Ti is a 60 class card, marketed as a 70Ti class card, sold at 90 class prices The rtx 4080 is a 70 class card(389mm^2 vs rtx 3070 392mm^2), marketed as an 80 class card sold at insane prices The rtx 4090 is an 80 class card, markted as a 90 class card, sold at ludicrous prices... So here are how prices go: 4060 8GB - 220$ 4060Ti 8GB - 270$ 4070 - 350$ 4070Ti - 420$ 4080 - 600$ 4090 - 900 -1000$ Anything more is unacceptable. RX 7900XTX is a 800XT class GPU that should cost 700$ RX 7900XT is a 800 non-XT class GPU that should cost 600$ RX 7800 XT is a 700 XT class GPU that should cost 400$ RX 7700 XT is a 700 non-XT class GPu that should cost 350$ RX 7600 is on 6nm so it is in fact a 600 class GPU by die size alone, but the process node is cheaper so it should cost 220$ and for a 16GB variant 250$
@@nexus_tech I've been playing at 4k for 10 years, starting with the r9 290x. Only reason I can think people stick with 1080p is esports and need 8 million FPS. Though 1440p is quickly catching 1080p, at least in the steam hardware survey. Also the question wasn't a jab at you, I just mean in general why do we still have companies like amd and nvidia advertising 1080p cards when we should be at least moving to 1440p.
You should test cyberpunk 2077 without RT too.
I agree, will do for next round 😉
The 6600 non-XT is the real champ of the rx 6000 series, along with the 6700 non-XT and 6800 non-XT. They are very efficient for their performance tier and the prices were great too once the mining died down.
Rt is a meme! Even with the fastest nvidia card you can not play with native resolution! For rt is not a thing maybe until the next two gen.
My 3080ti can raytrace cyberpunk with more than 60fps
@@donottouch9110 path tracing? native resolution?
@IsraelSocial at native 1440p on max except reflections reflections takes up 30 fps alone at the max setting but yeah high raytracing aswell
he asked pathtracing@@donottouch9110
They’re all memes, we can’t even get 1080p 60 on games now (no upscalling doesn’t count) both AMD and NVIDIA are scummy and so are the publishers that enable these dev teams to shit out horrible code where resolution and performance is heading backwards relying on AI to perform decently
I mean the 7700xt and 4070 is the ultimate 1080p cards for the "future proof" builder.
but both should be 350$ and they are not. Keep in mind the rtx 4070 is a 50Ti class card and the 7700XT is a sub-700 class card.
@@ivankovachev8835 the 4070 isn't a 50ti class at all? The 4060 is sure
@@GregoryShtevensh Nope the 4070 has a die size of 224mm^2 cut from 294mm^2.
The rtx 3050 has a die size of 197mm^2 cut from 276mm^2.
The gtx 1650 has a die size of 200mm^2
The gtx 1650 super(basically the Ti) has a die size of 237mm^2
So if anything it's actually between a 50 and a 50Ti class card.
The rtx 4060 is a 40/30 class card.
Here is how it goes:
The rtx 4060 is a 30/40 class card, marketed as 60 class card sold for 60 class prices
The rtx 4060Ti is a 50 class card, marketed as a 60Ti class card sold for 70 class prices.
The rtx 4070 is a 50Ti class card, marketed as a 70 class card, sold at 80 class prices.
The rtx 4070Ti is a 60 class card, marketed as a 70Ti class card, sold at 90 class prices
The rtx 4080 is a 70 class card(389mm^2 vs rtx 3070 392mm^2), marketed as an 80 class card sold at insane prices
The rtx 4090 is an 80 class card, markted as a 90 class card, sold at ludicrous prices...
So here are how prices go:
4060 8GB - 220$
4060Ti 8GB - 270$
4070 - 350$
4070Ti - 420$
4080 - 600$
4090 - 900 -1000$
Anything more is unacceptable.
RX 7900XTX is a 800XT class GPU that should cost 700$
RX 7900XT is a 800 non-XT class GPU that should cost 600$
RX 7800 XT is a 700 XT class GPU that should cost 400$
RX 7700 XT is a 700 non-XT class GPu that should cost 350$
RX 7600 is on 6nm so it is in fact a 600 class GPU by die size alone, but the process node is cheaper so it should cost 220$ and for a 16GB variant 250$
The better question is why are we still talking about 1080p in 2023?
why are you even watching this video then?
Great question, I think the majority of gamers are still using 1080. Plus, if new GPU'S were progressing faster, we wouldn't? 🙂
@@nexus_tech I've been playing at 4k for 10 years, starting with the r9 290x. Only reason I can think people stick with 1080p is esports and need 8 million FPS. Though 1440p is quickly catching 1080p, at least in the steam hardware survey. Also the question wasn't a jab at you, I just mean in general why do we still have companies like amd and nvidia advertising 1080p cards when we should be at least moving to 1440p.
@@thatguy3213 Because I'm subscribed to the channel and enjoy his content. Not that I have to justify myself to you.
No worries, I agree, 1440p should be the resolution to aim for in 2023