Alex from the AngryJoe show put it best. When a man in his fucking 40s (who is also married with a child) starts talking about the age of consent in specific areas, he is a creepy freak.
So then you are against someone in congress debating why other countries should raise their age of consent law? So in that case you would call them a creep because they’re 40. See how your logic makes no sense?
@@anaalicia5029the difference between the two being anti trans will at least give you support from the conservative but talking to kids while being 36 is weird no matter what's your political belief
@@isosceles1476 Drake "leaked" to Kendrick that he talks to minors and is a pedophile and fed him misinformation for their diss track beef. But like.. "ha ha ha i made you make a top 1 song about how im a pedophile! fool!" also he said that he was getting his information from clowns; he called himself a clown
His followers are incels, and they genuinely don't see a problem with creeping on or marrying teenagers because it means they get an easily-manipulable or abusable girlfriend/wife out of it.
Dr Disrespect really thought he’d be able to gaslight us into forgetting his admission of guilt if he deleted the tweet and denied it on stream with enough confidence 😭😭
What admission of guilt? You literally have no clue. He said inappropiate?> But if it's not sexting and not a minor than...he used cuss words and talked like a gamer online? STFU!
@@timekeeper2538 Right? His family is standing by him pretty strongly actually. That says enough. People Like @smoothlikesilk will hate anyone as long as their eceleb gods like Jamari tell them what to think how to think it. Low IQ low information NPCs
@timekeeper2538 whoa sorry bro, please leave my message board. Only people who are adults and date 18 and up can reply here. Any supporters of such shenanigans need to leave as well. Thank you.
I don't care, the argument of "well in their state, age of consent" is where Doc lost me. No late 30s married man should be talking sexual or having inappropriate conversations with a teen.
5:49 he said “it worked for drake, i’ll try it too!” little does he know the whole “i fed you that information” angle is ridiculous and logically serves no just cause even if you reach for one. because what reason would you have to benefit from pretending to be a PDF file? really sad man
@@downhillgangmoney isn’t everything little guy believe that. A broke guy like you thinks money means everything, hopefully you figure it out little dude lol
@downhillgang idk man, if my dad/partner was outed as a cheater and an alleged pedo, i think I'd be pretty embarrassed and wouldn't wanna be associated with them
Man I see you everywhere. Also bro your community tab polls are so fun to do, that tournament is so heat man. I'm subscribing to not miss any rounds in the future, also featherine mommy > mob the legend frankly :3
i mean come on i play world of warcraft and have since 2004. if that was the case i would not be able to communicate with like half of the playerbase. lol
@@AutocrossAhole oh man im so sorry! So you're admitting he cheated on his wife with a minor but I'm In the wrong because I say he cheated multiple times. Truly 8th dimensional chess my good sir/madame. Ladies and gentlemen i present, Dr. Disrespect's fan base. Spoon sucking brainlets. That think cheating with kids, is better than cheating multiple times. Applause all around I usually have to pay for a clown show like you. If a lifeguard has had to save you when drinking from a water bottle, you're probably on the same wavelength as the average Dr disrespect fan.
@@AutocrossAhole you're right my bad. It's ONLY a 40 year old man that cheated on his with with a kid. Whats the big deal. Lmao do you even hear yourself? You eat soup with a fork obviously.
the last few days i’ve seen people try to justify his actions. it’s so weird. i’ve seen people admit they wouldn’t care if their daughter talked to him while underage. these people are sick.
We don’t the full details. Where did he or they say it was girl he talking to? I thought he said 3 separate departments of safety found nothing sexual in the chats
Its wild that you as a MARRIED MAN WITH A CHILD thinks that any of these actions or messages were appropriate even if the person you were talking to was over the age of consent.
9:44 Doc you slipped up. Why would twitch need to investigate the age of consent in that area. The way you stated that makes it sound like the age was not atleast 18. Also he hasn’t once stated the individual age.
I don’t think he’s changing his statement that they were a minor lol but he is exposing himself because why would they need to worry about the age of consent if he wasn’t sexting them? Makes no sense. If what he said wasn’t sexual the age of consent is a non factor. He’s clearly a fucking liar and was sexting a teenager and for whatever reason knows they can’t share the dms so he feels confident lying about it.
He will not sue anyone, because if that was to happen all the evidence would have to become public information. Such as the girls name, age, location, and all of the messages.
His whole stream wasn’t for logical people. It was for the people that is still going to sub to him to give them an excuse to still follow him. It’s a PR play. He’s still the same dude who messaged a young person messages that were on the wrong side of inappropriate. Guy needs to just go away and take care of his family.. and maybe not cheat on his kids mother.
@byae your applying your morals to him so you can find him guilty. This is why we have laws with clear cut lines you don't cross, because your morals shouldn't govern anyone else. Did he break the law? No. I'll trust the professionals and not some UA-cam rumor video makers. They are professionals for a reason.
@byae logical people would trust the professionals who had access to all the evidence and chat logs. Illogical people would believe rumor video makers who have access to zero evidence and have demonstrated they twist evidence for views and clicks. So yeah, let's be logical about this.
@@DrSpoculus he did make a bold move claiming intentions on all sides (like saying there were no plans to meet or the problem being how other people could willfully misinterpret certain words) and reframing the context of the conversation from sexting with a minor to engaging in content with his audience, then refusing to show the actual conversation, and he did it pretty well but come on now. are you seriously arguing that we should put the bar so low it's just whether they broke the law or not? what about playing emulated ROMs of games you don't own? surely that's against the law...! you wouldn't engage in content with a pirate, wouldn't you? it is a pretty braindead argument is what i am saying, what you did and where it comes from. to put it in more words, if you don't want to come to your own conclusions given all the needed data given the claims, that's fine if you don't care but if you do, you might be having a case of the dead brains.
@mnemot yes, the standard we set as a society isn't based in your morals. That's why we have laws. You can judge him on your morals all you want. Nobody is stopping you from doing that. But we have laws to define clear cut lines you dont cross. He didn't cross those lines. What if his wife and him are swinger's? That may be wrong to you, but it's their choice. The point is that there were professionals who do this stuff every day on the case. They know what they are doing. You have to trust the professionals in this. He doesn't need to show any messages to UA-cam commenter's. They have no authority. It's more like you have gone so hard on doc that you can't back off now. Even when the evidence suggests he didn't do anything wrong. You're trying to draw a line in the sand, but you don't have that authority to do thar. He doesn't have to prove anything to you. You aren't involved and your not a lawyer. So, fuck the system, you need to see evidence to clear anyone of wrongdoing? Your the judge now? That's weird.
@insidemymindinc adults are allowed to tall to minors about business. Am I not allowed to talk to my female cousin because I'm an adult and she's 16? The intent is what matters. It's kind of crazy how everyone is saying there is no reason to ever text a minor when that's clearly not the case. One of the messages was, "What are your plans for twitch-con?". That's it. That message got twisted into "wanna fuck at twitch-con?" By rumor video makers. Professionals.... have gone over all the evidence. They determined nothing was wrong. Why should I believe UA-cam content creators who have zero access to any evidence, and the message they did have access to, they twisted out of context to an extreme?
@insidemymindinc what hill? Again, you're taking the moral high ground, but your morals don't matter here. What did he do that was wrong, and according to what law? Insisting that someone is a pdf without any evidence isn't a hill you should die on. Might as well be in a lynch mob hunting down a black man based on rumors. You gonna lynch doc based on videos made by people who have access to zero evidence and ignore the professional investigation findings? Wow, super morally superior stuff you do there. Lol
@@insidemymindinc let's say he releases the text messages. What do people think they are going to find that professional investigators didn't find in them?
@@ubergoober25 people wouldn't have even cared, and would have let it all pass eventually with no proof... IF he didn't make a tweet admitting it. that's where all this comes from.
Wait so you believe a random person making a single tweet saying he sexted a minor but since he has no screenshots or anything when defend himself, you don't believe him? That's kinda retarded fr.
@@ubergoober25yeah, the difference between both arguments of him being a creep and him being innocent is that he actively admitted to texting a minor inappropriately. If he gave a better response then he would never be in this situation in the first place
and the fact that hes somehow managing to keep his career and people on his side is wild to me. If you check his comments you can see that some of these people genuinely believe he’s an amazing guy. This man essentially says “i planned on you guys thinking they were under consent” which is such an ass pull because why frame yourself as a pdfile?? crazy situation
@@RedneckZach good intentions at times? yes. Saying he did one bad thing like it’s not that deep is insane. If I was to sext you’re teenage daughter then donate to charity would you say the same my friend?
@@RedneckZachreply was filtered. good intentions at times? yes. Saying he did one bad thing like it's not that deep is insane. If I was to be inappropriate with your teenage daughter then donate to charity would you say the same to me?
Like kids that what it means and doc likes kids in secret hes just only known for talking to kids which isnt a pedophile but we all know inside if he wouldnt get canceled he'd get with little girls so technicallyyy he's a pedophile just not because he talked to a minor hes a pedophile because he likes kids period.@webbike
@@webbikei mean if she was a minor at the time what business would you have talking to a minor if ur already married and have kids? Just puts yourself in a shitty situation that you dont need to be in
Dude...if you're a guy Docs age and you have to start using age of consent in certain jurisdictions as a defense...I'm not a gamer, I don't know much about Doc. What I do know is this is a godawful explanation and the man has some serious soul searching to do.
How does He disrespect it when its 100% legal to "sext" the Person and He claimed that He didnt even do that. so wtf are you on about. He didnt sext her and If He did it would Still BE legal.
@@MrMrbobo46 Actually, It's illegal to sext a minor/any underage individuals in the US, where Doc is from. People often confuse it with the "Age of Consent," which is 16 in some areas but just cause age of consent is 16, it would still be illegal to sext and receive nudes from anyone under the age of 18.
@@MrMrbobo46 Actually, It's illegal to sext a minor/any underage individuals in the US, where Doc is from. People often confuse it with the "Age of Consent," which is 16 in some areas but just cause age of consent is 16, it would still be illegal to sext and receive nudes from anyone under the age of 18.
The case was a suit over Twitch breaking their contract with Doc- it wasn’t brought to a Federal Hearing because it was never filed under that. The most probable reason for the initial accusations never reaching a criminal court probably has to do with lack of evidence (the “sexting” was probably one off messages and no real intent could be acquired under legal statues). As a result, we can comprehend that Doc, by a criminal court, has never been proven innocent or guilty, and that in a civil arbitration, Doc was cleared by an arbitrator “judge” (they aren’t actually judges) for his messages not constituting “sexting.” HOWEVER, you shouldn’t let the arbitrator judge’s conclusion be a representation of truth. There are many times where an individual is found innocent or acquitted in criminal court but found liable for their proposed charges and must pay fees. A famous example of this is OJ- acquitted for the murder but then proven liable in the deaths. How does that work? Well, it’s complicated…
That's what I found odd. "Twitch makes the decision to terminate my contract and ban me while admitting that they never investigated the age of consent in the jurisdiction where the users messages were sent and received ." That tells me that these messages were sent across state lines, possibly out of country where the age of consent would go up to 18. The fact that he's tap dancing around saying her age says a lot.
@llokgygvtfactually kissing a minor is legal. Technically sleeping with a minor is legal as long as they’re old enough to consent. But at the same time taking pictures of the minor you’re sleeping with is illegal and will get you thrown in jail. Does it make sense? No. But that’s how it works legally
@@notyourdad9548 but there’s so many registered and not registered sex offender weirdos in this world so they love it when one of their kind gets off the hook! Just like they did with Kobe
I think you have the best take so far. Seen a bunch of people just saying..."bro he tried to F a kid blah blah blah" and then there are others saying he is totally innocent. I think your right about the legal gray area. Or it's probably not even Grey. Legally he is ok. But that doesn't mean what he did was ok. Never should of been talking to someone 16-17 to begin with. He will still have a lot of fans. But we also have this follow him the rest of his career.
You can't interact with the same people who pays his bills? Every single streamer out there talks to their audience all the time, no matter the age. I make stupid jokes to random kids online all the time in game chats, is that not allowed too? Inappropriate can be absolutely anything, it doesn't need to be sexual....which he clearly stated btw, even Twitch admitted to that.
i mean, he goes on about how Twitch didn't go threw a legal process to suspend him and all that, but what he DOESN'T want to say, is that Twitch doesn't need any sort of Legal response for a ban, you're on their website under Their Terms and Conditions. And if they feel you've violated them, then they have ALL the right to ban or suspend you period.
@@l__f0 Nothing "DID" him in, he's still wildly popular on UA-cam. Twitch themselves admitted he did nothing wrong. He baited the media so hard, they ALL fell for it.
So because Twitch was incompetent and didn't do a proper investigation before banning him. Twitch didn't investigate whether the minor in question was in an age of consented state. Since it was a civil case to begin with there were never criminal charges levied out to Doc. So legally he's innocent, however since Doc admitted the messages were inappropriate at times hints to that morally he was doing something. See if he would have just released the Twitch Whispers we could form our opinions but Doc doesn't want to release those messages because he knows that they make him look bad. He's hiding something which goes against his "I'm always real and unfiltered" brand he set up. Unless he releases the messages no one should trust him.
He sued twitch the first time and risked discovery. Twitcj could have forgone arbitration and went to discovery. But they didn't and paid his contract. So....your theory needs some revisions to add up.
@bryancollier704 again they didn't do a proper investigation. It was a civil case that was about contract violations the lawsuit wasn't about the messages but rather why twitch decided to terminate Docs contract. The courts were leaning in Docs favor in regards to Twitch wrongfully terminating Docs contract which is why they settled to avoid it going further and possibly losing more money. Since Doc decided to corroborate the ex twitch staff members claim in his now deleted Twitter post it's odd that he's now saying that this was all just a "You activated my trap card, you thought I was a PDF but I made it all up to expose the media" it makes no sense. Why didn't Doc say this two months ago? If the messages aren't as bad as he claims why not show the messages? This could have been avoided months ago but all this latest response did was prove that he can't be trusted off of his word alone since he's contradicted his own previous statements about this situation.
Soo if they are in school , they can not watch Dr. Disrespect….if they are on vacation they have all the time to watch. Your argument don’t make sense but u are not the only one to say it
As a corp attorney I will say I believed him when he said he couldnt speak due to an NDA. But now I am certain he did something detestable. Because the fired twitch employee had nothing to lose so a NDA does nothing to him. It would be like saying I will sue a homeless person. But for DDR to speak out while still being allegedly under an NDA involving those twitch related dealings. It means he would stand to lose at minimum any amount he earned with them due to backlash of community outcry potentially. Which would result in quite a large amount of punitive damages. But since he spoke freely it means there was never any NDA directly saying he couldnt explain the details of the issue that resulted in a NDA. It would also be the reason he isnt able to reveal the chatlogs because he did something he knew wasnt right but the NDA is what protects that aspect of the agreement. Sealed message logs and no "employee" can refer to the situation in public formats. Which is a standard separation NDA contract for any private contractor dealings.
Twitch was responsible for keeping employees silent. He can defend himself from criminal allegations and speak on the subject to some extent after twitch violated NDA. Now if doc is lying, twitch can easily speak up and show he is lying. So we will see. Just cause one person breaches NDA, it's not gone.
@@bryancollier704 The keyword being "employees" silent. You will notice with most jobs they come with a similar disclosure agreement which would be similar to the standard NDA settlement contracts. Once he was fired he had no more obligation to abide by the "twitch company's" NDA. But even if we take your point right, he can defend himself against "criminal" allegation right? So this still would mean he can not speak to the public since gossip columns are not law enforcement warrants/indictments. Okay, lets say that doesnt matter and we continue sticking with your opinion. Why verbally spill the entire beans on the NDA but refuses to show chatlogs and offered several apologies while saying he indirectly did something clearly wrong. Which would be much more logical in my expert opinion of 9 years in corp law. NDA settlements arent done because someone is "innocent" of conduct violations to that company lol. He wasnt just signing that for giggles so if it was all harmless and so forth with the millions of dollars he had on hand couldve easily been spent on a clear contract violation lawsuit since he was terminated in the action of all the claims. He said they did no investigation and he had those messages confirming he was perfectly fine in what dialogue he had. But again he refuses to show the chatlog he vanished for months after this all hit social media, now he does a full turn around and still cant show what was said in full context? In my career I have NEVER seen that done or even heard of it being done lol. Twitch NDA's cant compel broke ex employees but they can compel rich contract workers on NDA locked resignations. Meaning the fact he spoke on the matter at all shows he had no true NDA but a normal buy out. It shows it was pretty serious at that time and the business move was to cut ties on both parties involved. So something questionable for sure happened and he knows it. It just took him time to remember that twitch wont put those messages out there because it hurts their money as much as his. But the ex employee had nothing to lose and everything to gain. I think him and that ex employee are morally bankrupt but contract wise i dont see a NDA be present in this that would not allow him to speak on or show what happened.
@@Rome__kingSeeing as Cody never technically referred to Doc does any issue arise? I can’t see it where Cody ever even alluded to the messages being about Doc. It wasn’t until Doc responded that we knew who Cody was talking about. I don’t follow Cody nor Doc. An average person would not know who or what Cody’s messages were about. An average person would have no way of knowing who the messages were about because no identifying information was given.
@@Michael-pi8ps I think we are on the same page then lol. I am only saying his behavior doesnt match "i cant talk due to NDA" but he continues to talk while showing he has suffered no significant financial loss. He didnt issue a lawsuit again anyone for breach of contract or defamation of character. That saying "a hurt dog will holler" is more true than not I found. I hope he isnt that type of person but if it were me and I know for certain i never did anything that sketchy regardless of context like you said i wouldnt even know to respond or care to do so. Especially making the amount of money he was at the time.
@@Rome__kingThe thing is even if what he did wasn’t considered unlawful, which wouldn’t be much of a surprise seeing how the laws have various loopholes and grey areas, morally he was in the wrong. Why entertain a conversation with said person who he admitted was a minor. Everything fell flat once he put out the apology, anything he says now is just him attempting to save face
I'm curious to see how this ultimately plays out. It's a reminder for everyone online to always maintain appropriate boundaries and consider their actions' potential impacts.
Doc is cappin' HARD. Either show the actual chat logs and list the age of who you were talking to or STFU. He already admitted to his actions, there's literally no point in him trying to walk it all back months later after he saw all the demonetizations and canceled brand sponsor ships. He needs to reach harder.
So you are saying that Twitch caught their streamer beeing a pdf and lost in court to him and payed him money for catching him? And they decided to never even show the messages or never mention what was in those messages? And on top of that judge as well was ok with pdf messages and did not put him in jail? Are you srsly that stupid??
Doesn’t take a genius to work out that he obviously has a lawyer behind him on it. If you know twitch also there many shady things twitch have done, people literally committing crimes snd having sex on it and still don’t get banned so wouldn’t surprise me if what he says about twitch has truth behind it.
God, I am soooo sick of the phrase "out of context" because all these UA-camrs that get caught doing something horrific always jump to "out of context" it's like bruh we know the context. You're just trying to gaslight us into thinking there's something we're missing but there's not. What's the context Doc? Y'all were roleplaying and you didn't know she wasn't underage? Another classic go to 🙄
@@Vergil666. “they took my messages out of context.” Okay, then show us the messages so we know the context. “Lol, what, are we in second grade?” Dude’s guilty AF
Having to include the "jurisdiction" where the "not quite minor" lives means they are for certain under 18. It should absolutely destroy your career directed at interacting with children.
“Do you know the legal definition of sexting? Because I do” does not sound nearly as good as he thought it did. If you have to get THAT technical, you clearly did something wrong and are using legal loopholes to finagle your way through the system
this guy had to accuse himself of being a predator first to control the narrative and like jamari said used lots of legal grey area to turn this back on twitch, even after they paid off his contract. thats what sickening about old pedos, they are really that constructive to get what they want
@@TheAlamzynot 100% certain but i think it’s cause in some states 16 is the age of consent but technically you’re not an adult until you are 18. so while a 16 year old could consent in certain states they aren’t adults yet and morally it’s wrong imo
@@TheAlamzy the legal of age on consent depends on where you live. In the U.S. it can be as low as 16. He also said that the person was a minor which means they are under 18. Taking both of his comments into consideration, this means the person he was talking to was either 16 or 17. I’ll like to mention that a lot of people maybe are confused about that, but doc is choosing his words very carefully to confused people. But at the end of the day the second a person mentions age of consent that means the person is under 18, that’s the only detail that actually matters here. He got away with it legally due to age of consent laws in which the user lives in. Which is why he brings that detail about.
@@iiheartevangaming Where is the "flirting" part? Did you even watch the video? Twitch themselves found nothing wrong in the chat logs, how is that considered "flirting" then?
@@iiheartevangaming Yeah "my bad" indeed. Just making shit up about people is not the way to go kiddo. Inappropriate could be a random fart joke, doesn't mean it was anything sexual. You're just guessing at this point.
@@fred6907 yea that’s definitely not what he meant and a grown man talking to a 17 year old is still crazy and defending it doesn’t look good on you either at the end of the day you had a daughter talking to a man in his late 30s at the time is very strange and should have never happened in the first place but let’s keep defending it because it’s ok for grown men to talk to highschool women👍🏽
I'm gonna be the minority here, looking at the comments, but let's say he was actually guilty of these stuff. Let's say, everythign is true that the Twitch guy says. He lost most if not all of his sponsors and partners during this process. He did suffer the consequences of his actions. But everybody acts like that this is the end of the road for him and there is no coming back. Which means that ppl think that if you make a mistake once, then you are done and you should be forgotten and outcasted from sociaty. I think this whole comeback for him probably is his way of saying he does not want to be cancelled because of one mistake. Let me just give you an example. Michael Vick literally killed dogs. multiple of them. I love dogs and I love Vick too. He spent his 2 years in prison, sacrificed 2 of his peak carreer years because he made multiple and horrible mistakes. But he did everything since then to right his wrongs and ppl slowly forgave him, networks are employ him, he is in a good place. I am definitely not saying that Doc didnt do anything bad. Looking at all these stuff he probably did. But for me it doesnt mean he should be in social purgatory for the rest of his life.
He’s made multiple mistakes. 1. Cheats on his wife constantly, we know about a few, there are most likely plenty. Once a cheater, always a cheater. 2. Talked to a minor inappropriately. Now, number two should have you publicly ostracized no matter if they’re 17 or 13. What’s the problem? What is the difference between 17 and 18? Legality, that’s it. Mentally? Nothing. 18 year olds still have, most of the time, a teenage mentality and still act like teenagers. Most young adults will regret or feel uncomfortable with past relationships because of age gaps. Look at Tana and Cody Ko; Tana was down and underage and later on in her life thought it was a terrible situation she put herself in. On the other hand, Cody should have known better but he did it anyways.
@@HomeboyMcGoo I dont understand your point. I started with let's say he is in fact guilty. I never argued that he shouldnt be punished for it. My argument was about a whole other thing
@@bencemester13 so what you are trying to say is if someone serves their time they should be forgiven? If you talk to minors you will do it again. If you cheat on your significant other, you will do it again. He is a repeat offender. He will not stop. Give Doc an inch he *will* take a mile. The severity of your offense determines the forgiveness. If a guy kills someone in cold blood, they should not be in society. If your prey on minors, you should not be in the general public. If you get in your car drunk and kill someone, you don’t deserve to be able to drive ever again. There needs to be consequences for bad behavior.
Technically inappropriate doesn't always mean sexual so only when the messages are released and all the evidence is shown can we really make a final verdict as the constant speculation without solid evidence is just incoherent at this point.
He also pulled out the age of consent “in their jurisdiction” argument, which is heavily implying 16-17 because if they’re over the federal AoC of 18, there’s no need to include the second part of the statement 😂
@RobGradyVO because it was brought up in the court case he won. It was a case about sexting. You think the definition wasn't brought up? This is what bothers me about the haters. The obvious reasons for things are thrown out so they can find the worse possible way to paint it. Professionals had access to all the evidence and chat logs. They went over it numerous times and fund nothing wrong. There were 3 possible charges they could have got him on and they could not even get 1 of them to stick. The issue was reported to child safety, and they decided it wasn't something to follow up on. But, rumor video makers who have access to zero evidence are controlling the narrative. These are people who make fake thumbnails showing people saying fake quotes to get views and likes. They literally start off with a lie to get you to watch their videos. Clickbait. They are who everyone believes? People who took the text that read "what are your plans for twitch-con?" And acted like it said "wanna fuck at twitch-con?" So they would get views. Ima go ahead and trust the professionals here.
@Faminetheblack why does he need to release the dms and show you to clear his name? The professionals who do this for a living didn't find anything wrong. Why does he have to prove it to anyone else? Why don't people trust the professionals who had access to all the evidence and chat logs? Why trust video creators who start with lies? Fake thumbnails showing people saying fake quotes.... all of them do it. They all LIE to get views. I'll trust the professionals who have seen the evidence.
Funny to see how different channels still trying to shit on Dr Disrispect, you guys can't win, can't you see how much support Doc is getting all over the internet, everyone is happy to have him back....
Its funny. Dude is doing everything to defend himself..except actually release the dms. The one thing that will fully exonerate him. To all of his stans in denial still..why wont he?
@@BruceLee-rc2dr Calling me a simple person while acting like that nda is still in play is hilarious. And even it was, which it isn't, anyone in his circumstance would 1000% release the dms regardless of being sued if there was nothing sus in the dms. But yeah man..I'm the dumb human here.
@@hotfunyunsop6196Don’t worry about doc sympathizers man. They don’t realize that NDA doesn’t protect criminal acts… Most likely a legal mandate was set from the case to keep the minor’s identity anonymous to prevent further harassment from the Doc’s fans.
@@BruceLee-rc2dr actually his NDA was nullified when one party decided to talk first. He is fine in that respect. The real issue is it's communications with a minor, you need their express permission to release the statements made. Which he is not in contact with that person for very obvious reasons. He was talking to kids privately and he admitted as much.
I think it's weird how he spun this narrative about how he "fooled" everyone with using the word inappropriate and minor in his tweet..like he had some kind of grand plan. The gaslighting he's doing in his "explanation" around people who asks for the messages.."are u second grade"..it just doesn't suit him. He was building up his speech as he was putting hard evidence on the table at the end ...witch it didn't.. Show the messages..how hard could it be?? He comes of as a narcissist not taking responsibility for jack. He just doesn't get it.Thinking he's the victim.
I'm confused, does it not matter that the US judicial system determined nothing illegal happened? Edit: And apparently, they also determined that nothing sexual was said in the messages
@9:08 Nah dawg. You can't find any messages of me being inappropriate with a minor. With or without context/cherry picking messages. Insane that he thinks everyone does this kinda shit. What a creepy pedo.
I mean, he did get all of us lol twitch admitted there was no sexting too. They had it out for him and he paid the price. He legally can’t announce he’s going to sue Cody. But we can be sure that he is. Naw, we all fucked up here and clearly had it wrong
Yeah it’s gonna be hella weird seeing all these people calling him a ped for the foreseeable future while having no evidence to support the claim other than a guy who is going to be sued for his entire life’s earnings x10 lol. It’s like the new red scare. Everyone thinking everyone is a ped
4:55 doc is getting “technical” and saying technically a lot and getting very specific on some of these definitions and anytime someone does that it always means that they either did do it and are trying to distract people from thinking that he might not have done anything. Or, he did something and he is trying to make qualifying statements so he can say “technically I did this, this, and that, and technically that’s not illegal to say this, this, or that”. It always shows you are some what guilty and you are trying to seem innocent in some aspect.
I kinda still question Cody tweet, Twitch actions (especially them after finding 17 year old hot tub streamers being allowed to do that type of content) and Doc making that stream and actions. I am gonna see how things on unfold with this one tbh. EDIT: inappropriate behavior doesn't always mean it's something 18+ so while that doc tweet was self incriminating. Cody tweet looks more questionable as I am listening to Doc more. Cody did claim he sent lewdtexting to a minor so it did actually create that narrative from Cody original tweet which is why folks started using the pdf jokes/memes
@@PeruvianPotato you mean the "pedophile" who went through legal processes and was told there was nothing sexual in the messages and no legal action was taken? that "pedophile"? I understand you just parrot what you see on the internet because youre stupid, but words have definitions. The device youre typing on has access to every definition of every word in the world. You should try looking up the definition of the word pedophile.
The thing he says that i notice is he said "twitch didnt investigate the age of consent for where the other person waa from" which leads me to assume she was very young but from a country like japan where the age of consent is 16😊
Doc ain't one though, was cleared of all wrong doings by the cops, a judge, and Twitch's own team post incident. If he were he would have been charged and convicted by now. But he isn't and there is ZERO proof to say he is one. so he is innocent.
Twitch fumbled the bag, judge saw no wrongdoing with the messages. Case closed. People are too nosey and love drama. I honestly don't care either way, i never really watched him and especially not after the original cheating drama.
Started to notice the only people that still defend him are literal minors themselves that do not understand how bad this actually is, Most likely 13-15 year olds, Same way other victims of pdf files like with the kris tyson situation, said that when they were still young, they saw it as harmless fun and hanging out with your favourite youtuber, but when they got older they noticed how horrible it actually was, I fully believe its the same with these fans and how they defend him saying he did nothing wrong because he apparently said so, They dont understand yet that this is absolutely horrible and have not formed mature thinking skills yet. also doesnt help that his horrible explanation that makes 0% sense in every single universe that may exist, was done entirely in character, really shows how he is mostly trying to convince his fans that he did nothing wrong so he has a mob to defend him when allegations arise.
@@bryancollier704 Please explain how "oh but in her state she was over the age of consent!!111" when he himself lived in a state where she wasn't, because realize, that does automatically justify pdfiles contacting nigerian children for pictures, a country where the age of consent is 11+. I cant believe me, A 18 year old who dropped out during 10th grade and has worked ever since has to explain to you how little sense anything he said makes when you yourself look around 26.
a 42 year old man talking sexual to 13 year olds should be a big red flag for any kid. their parents must have failed them so hard to not teach them to not talk to strange old men.
@bryancollier704 no it doesn't. The dude literally couldn't stay consistent in his 20 minute statement. He just threw conspiracy theories at the wall and hoped something would stick. Then tried to distract people by harping on the fact that LEGALLY he did nothing wrong. Anyone who's watched any sort of TCAP or actually took the time to look up the definitions of the things he was talking about would know that the bar for being criminally inappropriate with a minor is actually pretty high. But just because he isn't criminally guilty, doesn't mean he isn't a creep. The dude was messaging a girl that he could have been a father of. He was 38 at the time. Just think about that. That's a dad messaging one of your high school friends inappropriately. No one in the real world would say that that is normal and he's not a creep He already he admitted he effed up in his original tweet. I have no idea what possessed him to try and walk it back with this terrible statement but good lord. Anyone not in their early twenties and below saw this for what it is
Doc thinks since he’s not legally in trouble yet that he’s ok. He still admitted as a married adult that he was having inappropriate chats with a minor. But then again weirdos like weirdos so he’ll get away with it.
Him doing this response in his character was wild.
He needs to stop dressing like a clown for the kids and stream to adults. Maybe use his money for therapy for his children.
Moist repeat not
Why shouldn't he?
@@Averagehazmat Doesn’t seem like he’s taking the situation seriously.
Almost 80k+ viewers watching his return on Friday tells me no one really cares 🤷♂️
Bros trying to act like he’s Nikocado Acocado and 5 steps ahead.
Finally it’s completed:
ua-cam.com/video/C7HkRTTMjPk/v-deo.html
Love this lol
you fell for Niko. Fool and a goof. there's legal actions behind this how delusional you are.
@@TheCirticIeDriknerno
5 family meals ahead
That was probably the worst pdf file defence if ever seen since The Heart Part 6
Bro went to the drake school of public defense
@@JAMARISPEAKS😂😂😂
his entire thing was “I planned for you guys to think i was a pdf file” and he was in CHARACTER. 😭🙏
😂😂😂😂 good shit my friend
@@decentcy nasty work champ 😂
Alex from the AngryJoe show put it best. When a man in his fucking 40s (who is also married with a child) starts talking about the age of consent in specific areas, he is a creepy freak.
💯
real shit
Not a fan of Costume boy but do you hold Jerry Seinfeld to the same standard?
@@DeckofLies bro nobody here is talking about Jerry Seinfeld. If he did the same thing then yeah he can get it too.
So then you are against someone in congress debating why other countries should raise their age of consent law? So in that case you would call them a creep because they’re 40. See how your logic makes no sense?
The fact he didn't sue cody for a defamation lawsuit makes this very sus because it just shows that Codys statement carrys some truth
Not just some truth, it means that the case wouldn't stand in court because no defamation occurred.
Why waste money on Cody who has nothing. And even if he did sue, all you would say “he’s trying to silence Cody”
cody hasent said anything about it even after he saw the stream... why is that?
Yup very good observation sir.
@@Boyslim826 this is true lol he's dammed if he does and dammed if he doesnt
He's literally just reading from from a script. He didn't go on vacation. He had his PR team working OT
Straight up noticed it to after the first 3 lines. Bro sounded like he was reading a screenwrite
You could see the reflection in his glasses.
Wow you guys are amazing detectives.
@@Andrew-i2t u want us to find your biological father next?
ok now try proving hes guilty o he made a kid like you cry for being dumb
Who in their right mind would go out and say i baited the media into thinking i talk to kids
Someone who’s actually did all that, that’s who 😂
He baited people into believing he was anti-trans, while being very enthusiastic about trans women
@@anaalicia5029the difference between the two being anti trans will at least give you support from the conservative but talking to kids while being 36 is weird no matter what's your political belief
@@ayouberriouch5973 yeah that’s worse, but it’s both bad
@@chanr9531 Ovo
He really tried the same move Drake made. That "you fell into my trap" bs.
Huh? lmao.... huh..?
@@isosceles1476 Drake "leaked" to Kendrick that he talks to minors and is a pedophile and fed him misinformation for their diss track beef. But like.. "ha ha ha i made you make a top 1 song about how im a pedophile! fool!" also he said that he was getting his information from clowns; he called himself a clown
We fed you the information 🤓
"I only PRETENDED to be a pdf file. YOU FOOLS"
Uhh okay dude.
Dr Disrespect the new EDP of Twitch plus the same guy who stumbles onto his own words because he is his own enemy
Bot
What's EDP
A youtuber getting caught with chld pron@@millhousemillard2140
Admits to being a creep. Now starts gaslighting...anyone who follows doc still needs their heads checked.
Crazy part is 99% of the people still following him are young boys
Guarantee you were one of his fanboys that made him popular
His followers are incels, and they genuinely don't see a problem with creeping on or marrying teenagers because it means they get an easily-manipulable or abusable girlfriend/wife out of it.
Dr Disrespect really thought he’d be able to gaslight us into forgetting his admission of guilt if he deleted the tweet and denied it on stream with enough confidence 😭😭
He thinks he's Christian Bale in the Prestige, fooling the audience with his twin. Really he's Guy Beam, distracting us with Dr. Disrespect.
he’s just a pedo. The comeback ego is wild. Like dude you just barely didn’t go to prison for 15yrs.
What admission of guilt? You literally have no clue. He said inappropiate?> But if it's not sexting and not a minor than...he used cuss words and talked like a gamer online? STFU!
Many of his fans dont care what he had done
I can't speak for others but I do care, say what you want about him as he messed up. Also please leave the fam out of this, I beg 🙏❤
Judge: "It's not illegal, but it's definitely gross, dude."
Dr. Pdf: "You hear that! NOT ILLEGAL"
For real. He thinks that’s a win for him. He can’t even address it as a man, out of character and genuine. It’s absurd.
Literally this whole “argument” in a nutshell
Meh why should I care if he did something "gross" if his wife doesn't even care, she forgave him after all.
@@timekeeper2538 Right? His family is standing by him pretty strongly actually. That says enough. People Like @smoothlikesilk will hate anyone as long as their eceleb gods like Jamari tell them what to think how to think it. Low IQ low information NPCs
@timekeeper2538 whoa sorry bro, please leave my message board. Only people who are adults and date 18 and up can reply here. Any supporters of such shenanigans need to leave as well. Thank you.
I don't care, the argument of "well in their state, age of consent" is where Doc lost me. No late 30s married man should be talking sexual or having inappropriate conversations with a teen.
If you actually listened he stated multiple times the context of the whispers were never sexual but go on......
@joemama2455 then why did all this happen bro???
He literally wasn't. These fucking dishonest haters....
@@joemama2455 if these are such innocent conversations why doesn't he just release these squeaky clean DM's?
But go on.....
@@solidsnek1776we’re hating for thinking it’s weird a 35 yr old man is talking to a 17 yr old????????
5:49 he said “it worked for drake, i’ll try it too!” little does he know the whole “i fed you that information” angle is ridiculous and logically serves no just cause even if you reach for one. because what reason would you have to benefit from pretending to be a PDF file? really sad man
Him addressing his VERY SERIOUS allegations in character shows exactly the kind of person he is.
His family must be so embarrassed brooo
It's Thanksgiving Christmas time;:/
Eh, he made over 30k on that one stream from donations. I don't think they care...
@@downhillgangmoney isn’t everything little guy believe that. A broke guy like you thinks money means everything, hopefully you figure it out little dude lol
@downhillgang idk man, if my dad/partner was outed as a cheater and an alleged pedo, i think I'd be pretty embarrassed and wouldn't wanna be associated with them
@@downhillgang money poisons the soul and ego.
Bro really thought he could sneak back in due to the MrBeast drama 💀
Man I see you everywhere. Also bro your community tab polls are so fun to do, that tournament is so heat man. I'm subscribing to not miss any rounds in the future, also featherine mommy > mob the legend frankly :3
@@AnimeBinger370 💀💀
Bro what mr beast drama? Nothing was done to mr beast he still uploading. He is gucci. Dr can appeal again for the youtube partnership
how delusional you are.
He didn't sneak back in. He stormed in successfully and confidently because he knows he did nothing illegal and the internet's claims are false.
Bro acting like hes the victim for talking to kids
lol like you know the insights. You love being a sheep
These people always try to play the victim to garner sympathy from their parasocial fans who are already heavily biased in favor of him
Is there actual proof though? No? Then shut up.
talking sexual to kids*
you can talk to kids. thats not illegal. its the talking sexual part thats illegal.
i mean come on i play world of warcraft and have since 2004. if that was the case i would not be able to communicate with like half of the playerbase. lol
Come on guys its ONLY A 40 year old man cheating on his wife AGAIN, but this time with a kid. Whats the big deal
if you were smart. youd know that he cheated on his wife in 2017. exactly the same time these messages happened. *Facepalm*
@@AutocrossAhole oh man im so sorry! So you're admitting he cheated on his wife with a minor but I'm In the wrong because I say he cheated multiple times. Truly 8th dimensional chess my good sir/madame.
Ladies and gentlemen i present, Dr. Disrespect's fan base. Spoon sucking brainlets. That think cheating with kids, is better than cheating multiple times. Applause all around I usually have to pay for a clown show like you.
If a lifeguard has had to save you when drinking from a water bottle, you're probably on the same wavelength as the average Dr disrespect fan.
@@AutocrossAhole you're right my bad. It's ONLY a 40 year old man that cheated on his with with a kid. Whats the big deal.
Lmao do you even hear yourself? You eat soup with a fork obviously.
@@AutocrossAhole 😂😂😂 "ummm actually he only cheated with a minor once"
@@AutocrossAhole "ummm actually he only cheated with a minor once" 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
How he is not behind bars is beyond me
the last few days i’ve seen people try to justify his actions. it’s so weird. i’ve seen people admit they wouldn’t care if their daughter talked to him while underage. these people are sick.
It's idol worship.... It makes sense sadly if you're religious.
Because they are kids or grown weirdo adults who will never have kids
@@McLovinMcFlurryExactly no adult are gonna waste their time watching people stream a game it’s mainly kids and weird mf sticking up for this pos 😡
We don’t the full details. Where did he or they say it was girl he talking to?
I thought he said 3 separate departments of safety found nothing sexual in the chats
Those people are genuine weirdos
From doc to pdf
make this top comment
@SwiftViIIage are you a bot😂
So you could say he reached his final form
Accurate 😂
Lmfao
Its wild that you as a MARRIED MAN WITH A CHILD thinks that any of these actions or messages were appropriate even if the person you were talking to was over the age of consent.
For real... 😡
You are talking as if you saw the entire conversation yourself. Fucking twitter bot, can't think for themselves.
It’s unfortunate that so many people in the world see this as perfectly fine and still defending him
@@chanr9531 like he has a whole relationship and decides to step out of it for some stupid shit
Hold back with that common sense hon...
9:44 Doc you slipped up. Why would twitch need to investigate the age of consent in that area. The way you stated that makes it sound like the age was not atleast 18. Also he hasn’t once stated the individual age.
I don’t think he’s changing his statement that they were a minor lol but he is exposing himself because why would they need to worry about the age of consent if he wasn’t sexting them? Makes no sense. If what he said wasn’t sexual the age of consent is a non factor. He’s clearly a fucking liar and was sexting a teenager and for whatever reason knows they can’t share the dms so he feels confident lying about it.
He will not sue anyone, because if that was to happen all the evidence would have to become public information. Such as the girls name, age, location, and all of the messages.
His whole stream wasn’t for logical people. It was for the people that is still going to sub to him to give them an excuse to still follow him. It’s a PR play. He’s still the same dude who messaged a young person messages that were on the wrong side of inappropriate. Guy needs to just go away and take care of his family.. and maybe not cheat on his kids mother.
@byae your applying your morals to him so you can find him guilty.
This is why we have laws with clear cut lines you don't cross, because your morals shouldn't govern anyone else.
Did he break the law? No. I'll trust the professionals and not some UA-cam rumor video makers. They are professionals for a reason.
@@DrSpoculus😂😂😂😂😂
@byae logical people would trust the professionals who had access to all the evidence and chat logs.
Illogical people would believe rumor video makers who have access to zero evidence and have demonstrated they twist evidence for views and clicks.
So yeah, let's be logical about this.
@@DrSpoculus he did make a bold move claiming intentions on all sides (like saying there were no plans to meet or the problem being how other people could willfully misinterpret certain words) and reframing the context of the conversation from sexting with a minor to engaging in content with his audience, then refusing to show the actual conversation, and he did it pretty well but come on now. are you seriously arguing that we should put the bar so low it's just whether they broke the law or not? what about playing emulated ROMs of games you don't own? surely that's against the law...! you wouldn't engage in content with a pirate, wouldn't you?
it is a pretty braindead argument is what i am saying, what you did and where it comes from. to put it in more words, if you don't want to come to your own conclusions given all the needed data given the claims, that's fine if you don't care but if you do, you might be having a case of the dead brains.
@mnemot yes, the standard we set as a society isn't based in your morals. That's why we have laws.
You can judge him on your morals all you want. Nobody is stopping you from doing that. But we have laws to define clear cut lines you dont cross. He didn't cross those lines.
What if his wife and him are swinger's? That may be wrong to you, but it's their choice.
The point is that there were professionals who do this stuff every day on the case. They know what they are doing. You have to trust the professionals in this.
He doesn't need to show any messages to UA-cam commenter's. They have no authority.
It's more like you have gone so hard on doc that you can't back off now. Even when the evidence suggests he didn't do anything wrong.
You're trying to draw a line in the sand, but you don't have that authority to do thar. He doesn't have to prove anything to you. You aren't involved and your not a lawyer.
So, fuck the system, you need to see evidence to clear anyone of wrongdoing? Your the judge now? That's weird.
Being dressed in his outfit and referring to himself in third person the entire time was extremely weird.
Like the stream where he admitted he cheated on his wife in 2017 was worth taking off the wig but this wasn't? lol
@@lil-soda-boiyeah it’s wild he took his response to cheating in his wife more seriously than him inappropriately messaging a minor
“How dare you spew lies against the 2 time”
He’s like nearly 50 years old acting like this. My god he’s fucking cringe
Damn he cheated on his wife too? just makes all this that much more believable
That wig looks itchy asf 😂
15 yr old on the passenger seat 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 YOOOO 3:13
😂😂
I died 😂😂😂😂😂
@@nishkaghzala762 me too 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I came to drop this comment 😂
Bro that killed me too
“I’m only cheating on my wife again. Not texting a minor” okay brother. But you made the statement that says otherwise
@insidemymindinc adults are allowed to tall to minors about business. Am I not allowed to talk to my female cousin because I'm an adult and she's 16?
The intent is what matters. It's kind of crazy how everyone is saying there is no reason to ever text a minor when that's clearly not the case.
One of the messages was, "What are your plans for twitch-con?". That's it.
That message got twisted into "wanna fuck at twitch-con?" By rumor video makers.
Professionals.... have gone over all the evidence. They determined nothing was wrong.
Why should I believe UA-cam content creators who have zero access to any evidence, and the message they did have access to, they twisted out of context to an extreme?
@@DrSpoculus this is not the hill to defend brother
@insidemymindinc what hill? Again, you're taking the moral high ground, but your morals don't matter here.
What did he do that was wrong, and according to what law?
Insisting that someone is a pdf without any evidence isn't a hill you should die on. Might as well be in a lynch mob hunting down a black man based on rumors.
You gonna lynch doc based on videos made by people who have access to zero evidence and ignore the professional investigation findings?
Wow, super morally superior stuff you do there. Lol
@@insidemymindinc let's say he releases the text messages. What do people think they are going to find that professional investigators didn't find in them?
@@DrSpoculus well if his midnight company didn’t find something suspect they wouldn’t have said “we assumed his innocence
No evidence, no screenshots, nothing in this video is making him innocent. If anything, he sounds very guilty.
Funny because there’s no screenshots or hard evidence against him either.
@@ubergoober25 Yeah, cause he's hiding it himself
@@ubergoober25 people wouldn't have even cared, and would have let it all pass eventually with no proof... IF he didn't make a tweet admitting it. that's where all this comes from.
Wait so you believe a random person making a single tweet saying he sexted a minor but since he has no screenshots or anything when defend himself, you don't believe him? That's kinda retarded fr.
@@ubergoober25yeah, the difference between both arguments of him being a creep and him being innocent is that he actively admitted to texting a minor inappropriately. If he gave a better response then he would never be in this situation in the first place
and the fact that hes somehow managing to keep his career and people on his side is wild to me. If you check his comments you can see that some of these people genuinely believe he’s an amazing guy. This man essentially says “i planned on you guys thinking they were under consent” which is such an ass pull because why frame yourself as a pdfile?? crazy situation
He's a good guy who did one bad thing and everyone hates him for it.
@@RedneckZach good intentions at times? yes. Saying he did one bad thing like it’s not that deep is insane. If I was to sext you’re teenage daughter then donate to charity would you say the same my friend?
@@RedneckZachI am guessing you support PDFilia? Are you the same kind as him? Don't be shy. Chris Hansen is waiting for you. 😂😂😂😂
@@RedneckZach your hard drive needs to be confiscated and your ass needs to be investigated. that or youre a bad baiter
@@RedneckZachreply was filtered. good intentions at times? yes. Saying he did one bad thing like it's not that deep is insane. If I was to be inappropriate with your teenage daughter then donate to charity would you say the same to me?
Bro is still weird don’t care what anyone says!!!
Exactly!
He’s literally trying to act like because they were over the age of consent it’s legal. I don’t think he understands what a pdf is.
@@sacredalien8011 It seems you're the one who doesn't understand what pdf means, lol.
Like kids that what it means and doc likes kids in secret hes just only known for talking to kids which isnt a pedophile but we all know inside if he wouldnt get canceled he'd get with little girls so technicallyyy he's a pedophile just not because he talked to a minor hes a pedophile because he likes kids period.@webbike
@@webbikei mean if she was a minor at the time what business would you have talking to a minor if ur already married and have kids? Just puts yourself in a shitty situation that you dont need to be in
It always amazes me how people blame everyone for their own mistakes
Dude...if you're a guy Docs age and you have to start using age of consent in certain jurisdictions as a defense...I'm not a gamer, I don't know much about Doc. What I do know is this is a godawful explanation and the man has some serious soul searching to do.
Dr. Disrespect The age of consent & blame others with no proof.
Feel free to correct me but does he still have access to these messages? Maybe he remembers them so he should atleast make a comment
@SwiftViIIage tf is this trash
How does He disrespect it when its 100% legal to "sext" the Person and He claimed that He didnt even do that. so wtf are you on about. He didnt sext her and If He did it would Still BE legal.
@@MrMrbobo46 Actually, It's illegal to sext a minor/any underage individuals in the US, where Doc is from. People often confuse it with the "Age of Consent," which is 16 in some areas but just cause age of consent is 16, it would still be illegal to sext and receive nudes from anyone under the age of 18.
@@MrMrbobo46 Actually, It's illegal to sext a minor/any underage individuals in the US, where Doc is from. People often confuse it with the "Age of Consent," which is 16 in some areas but just cause age of consent is 16, it would still be illegal to sext and receive nudes from anyone under the age of 18.
Local age of consent doesn’t matter for internet activity. That enters federal jurisdiction, and that age of majority is 18.
yup you're right but people are braindead.
The case was a suit over Twitch breaking their contract with Doc- it wasn’t brought to a Federal Hearing because it was never filed under that. The most probable reason for the initial accusations never reaching a criminal court probably has to do with lack of evidence (the “sexting” was probably one off messages and no real intent could be acquired under legal statues). As a result, we can comprehend that Doc, by a criminal court, has never been proven innocent or guilty, and that in a civil arbitration, Doc was cleared by an arbitrator “judge” (they aren’t actually judges) for his messages not constituting “sexting.” HOWEVER, you shouldn’t let the arbitrator judge’s conclusion be a representation of truth. There are many times where an individual is found innocent or acquitted in criminal court but found liable for their proposed charges and must pay fees. A famous example of this is OJ- acquitted for the murder but then proven liable in the deaths. How does that work? Well, it’s complicated…
@@davidlauderdale7147Nonetheless, he shouldn’t be talking to minors. Anything else is just noise
That's what I found odd. "Twitch makes the decision to terminate my contract and ban me while admitting that they never investigated the age of consent in the jurisdiction where the users messages were sent and received ." That tells me that these messages were sent across state lines, possibly out of country where the age of consent would go up to 18. The fact that he's tap dancing around saying her age says a lot.
@llokgygvtfactually kissing a minor is legal. Technically sleeping with a minor is legal as long as they’re old enough to consent.
But at the same time taking pictures of the minor you’re sleeping with is illegal and will get you thrown in jail.
Does it make sense? No. But that’s how it works legally
Bro dresses up as a character to get a chance to talk to minors. What a freak.
@SwiftViIIage okay yeah youre definitely a bot
I dont think that was the decision behind the costume.
Santa Claus
What an immature take, is that whats hes does? i thought he played video games.
Reminds me of why Disney doesn't allow Cosplay in their parks, because Creeps were using as a means to get to minors.
He just repeated what he said in the tweet and his fanbase of losers said yeah you tricked em Dr Kidinspect. You are a genius and r/im14andthisisdeep/
Ppl actually in the comments defending him with this drake ahh response 😭😭😭
only pedophiles defend pedophiles.
Man got counseled by his expensive lawyer who told him what to say LMAO let’s forget about him admitting guilt at first right? 😂😂😂
The same lawyer Drake used lol
@@notyourdad9548 but there’s so many registered and not registered sex offender weirdos in this world so they love it when one of their kind gets off the hook! Just like they did with Kobe
I think you have the best take so far. Seen a bunch of people just saying..."bro he tried to F a kid blah blah blah" and then there are others saying he is totally innocent. I think your right about the legal gray area. Or it's probably not even Grey. Legally he is ok. But that doesn't mean what he did was ok. Never should of been talking to someone 16-17 to begin with. He will still have a lot of fans. But we also have this follow him the rest of his career.
You can't interact with the same people who pays his bills? Every single streamer out there talks to their audience all the time, no matter the age. I make stupid jokes to random kids online all the time in game chats, is that not allowed too? Inappropriate can be absolutely anything, it doesn't need to be sexual....which he clearly stated btw, even Twitch admitted to that.
Nikocado Avocado returned, now Dr disrespect.
Who's next?
Nikocado aint a predator tho
Edp
EDP445
@@wiseguy4725nah he’s just a regular law abiding sack of shit.
Your mom.
i mean, he goes on about how Twitch didn't go threw a legal process to suspend him and all that, but what he DOESN'T want to say, is that Twitch doesn't need any sort of Legal response for a ban, you're on their website under Their Terms and Conditions. And if they feel you've violated them, then they have ALL the right to ban or suspend you period.
U cant act like you are 2 steps ahead when your brain goes three steps backwards
A guy who ruined his own career from one tweet and now pointing fingers on others?
One tweet wasn't the main reason
Ruined his career? Dude, 250k live stream viewership and 500k new subscribers over night is not ruining ones career lol
@@turboshazed7370 im pretty sure him saying that he texted a minor inappropriately is what did him in.
@@l__f0 Nothing "DID" him in, he's still wildly popular on UA-cam. Twitch themselves admitted he did nothing wrong. He baited the media so hard, they ALL fell for it.
@@fred6907 yeah yeah,
Good luck living it down, or really carrying on with that tainted reputation
So because Twitch was incompetent and didn't do a proper investigation before banning him. Twitch didn't investigate whether the minor in question was in an age of consented state. Since it was a civil case to begin with there were never criminal charges levied out to Doc. So legally he's innocent, however since Doc admitted the messages were inappropriate at times hints to that morally he was doing something.
See if he would have just released the Twitch Whispers we could form our opinions but Doc doesn't want to release those messages because he knows that they make him look bad. He's hiding something which goes against his "I'm always real and unfiltered" brand he set up. Unless he releases the messages no one should trust him.
He sued twitch the first time and risked discovery. Twitcj could have forgone arbitration and went to discovery. But they didn't and paid his contract. So....your theory needs some revisions to add up.
@bryancollier704 again they didn't do a proper investigation. It was a civil case that was about contract violations the lawsuit wasn't about the messages but rather why twitch decided to terminate Docs contract. The courts were leaning in Docs favor in regards to Twitch wrongfully terminating Docs contract which is why they settled to avoid it going further and possibly losing more money.
Since Doc decided to corroborate the ex twitch staff members claim in his now deleted Twitter post it's odd that he's now saying that this was all just a "You activated my trap card, you thought I was a PDF but I made it all up to expose the media" it makes no sense. Why didn't Doc say this two months ago? If the messages aren't as bad as he claims why not show the messages? This could have been avoided months ago but all this latest response did was prove that he can't be trusted off of his word alone since he's contradicted his own previous statements about this situation.
I don’t understand the hype around this dude.
A long time ago he was pretty cool to a lot of teenagers. That's it.
He won’t sue bc then the real age comes out and messages
Coming back when school is around the corner is crazy
All the minors are back in school so Dr Disrespect has a lot of free time on his hands now 💀
Soo if they are in school , they can not watch Dr. Disrespect….if they are on vacation they have all the time to watch. Your argument don’t make sense but u are not the only one to say it
He really came back and said "I was just trolling and yall fell for it"
And ALL the media outlets fell for it, for the whole world to see. Not the first time msm is caught lying.
As a corp attorney I will say I believed him when he said he couldnt speak due to an NDA. But now I am certain he did something detestable. Because the fired twitch employee had nothing to lose so a NDA does nothing to him. It would be like saying I will sue a homeless person. But for DDR to speak out while still being allegedly under an NDA involving those twitch related dealings. It means he would stand to lose at minimum any amount he earned with them due to backlash of community outcry potentially. Which would result in quite a large amount of punitive damages. But since he spoke freely it means there was never any NDA directly saying he couldnt explain the details of the issue that resulted in a NDA. It would also be the reason he isnt able to reveal the chatlogs because he did something he knew wasnt right but the NDA is what protects that aspect of the agreement. Sealed message logs and no "employee" can refer to the situation in public formats. Which is a standard separation NDA contract for any private contractor dealings.
Twitch was responsible for keeping employees silent. He can defend himself from criminal allegations and speak on the subject to some extent after twitch violated NDA. Now if doc is lying, twitch can easily speak up and show he is lying. So we will see. Just cause one person breaches NDA, it's not gone.
@@bryancollier704 The keyword being "employees" silent. You will notice with most jobs they come with a similar disclosure agreement which would be similar to the standard NDA settlement contracts. Once he was fired he had no more obligation to abide by the "twitch company's" NDA. But even if we take your point right, he can defend himself against "criminal" allegation right? So this still would mean he can not speak to the public since gossip columns are not law enforcement warrants/indictments.
Okay, lets say that doesnt matter and we continue sticking with your opinion. Why verbally spill the entire beans on the NDA but refuses to show chatlogs and offered several apologies while saying he indirectly did something clearly wrong. Which would be much more logical in my expert opinion of 9 years in corp law. NDA settlements arent done because someone is "innocent" of conduct violations to that company lol. He wasnt just signing that for giggles so if it was all harmless and so forth with the millions of dollars he had on hand couldve easily been spent on a clear contract violation lawsuit since he was terminated in the action of all the claims. He said they did no investigation and he had those messages confirming he was perfectly fine in what dialogue he had.
But again he refuses to show the chatlog he vanished for months after this all hit social media, now he does a full turn around and still cant show what was said in full context? In my career I have NEVER seen that done or even heard of it being done lol. Twitch NDA's cant compel broke ex employees but they can compel rich contract workers on NDA locked resignations. Meaning the fact he spoke on the matter at all shows he had no true NDA but a normal buy out. It shows it was pretty serious at that time and the business move was to cut ties on both parties involved. So something questionable for sure happened and he knows it. It just took him time to remember that twitch wont put those messages out there because it hurts their money as much as his. But the ex employee had nothing to lose and everything to gain. I think him and that ex employee are morally bankrupt but contract wise i dont see a NDA be present in this that would not allow him to speak on or show what happened.
@@Rome__kingSeeing as Cody never technically referred to Doc does any issue arise? I can’t see it where Cody ever even alluded to the messages being about Doc. It wasn’t until Doc responded that we knew who Cody was talking about.
I don’t follow Cody nor Doc. An average person would not know who or what Cody’s messages were about. An average person would have no way of knowing who the messages were about because no identifying information was given.
@@Michael-pi8ps I think we are on the same page then lol. I am only saying his behavior doesnt match "i cant talk due to NDA" but he continues to talk while showing he has suffered no significant financial loss. He didnt issue a lawsuit again anyone for breach of contract or defamation of character. That saying "a hurt dog will holler" is more true than not I found.
I hope he isnt that type of person but if it were me and I know for certain i never did anything that sketchy regardless of context like you said i wouldnt even know to respond or care to do so. Especially making the amount of money he was at the time.
@@Rome__kingThe thing is even if what he did wasn’t considered unlawful, which wouldn’t be much of a surprise seeing how the laws have various loopholes and grey areas, morally he was in the wrong. Why entertain a conversation with said person who he admitted was a minor. Everything fell flat once he put out the apology, anything he says now is just him attempting to save face
Loved every second vid! You nailed it!
I'm curious to see how this ultimately plays out. It's a reminder for everyone online to always maintain appropriate boundaries and consider their actions' potential impacts.
Doc is cappin' HARD. Either show the actual chat logs and list the age of who you were talking to or STFU. He already admitted to his actions, there's literally no point in him trying to walk it all back months later after he saw all the demonetizations and canceled brand sponsor ships. He needs to reach harder.
The worst thing is that there are people who actually believe him and are actively defending him.
only pedophiles defend pedophiles.
my problem is the fact twitch is going unpunished even when they knew
So you are saying that Twitch caught their streamer beeing a pdf and lost in court to him and payed him money for catching him? And they decided to never even show the messages or never mention what was in those messages? And on top of that judge as well was ok with pdf messages and did not put him in jail? Are you srsly that stupid??
Doesn’t take a genius to work out that he obviously has a lawyer behind him on it. If you know twitch also there many shady things twitch have done, people literally committing crimes snd having sex on it and still don’t get banned so wouldn’t surprise me if what he says about twitch has truth behind it.
The worst thing is people ignoring that a court cleared him of any wrong doing to try and destroy someone who they're jealous of
Dr disrespect came back ❌️
Dr disrespect tried to come back ✅️
Dr disrespect came back ❌
Dr disrespect tried to come on a minor's back ✅
@@turtleman8968 thats wild asf
God, I am soooo sick of the phrase "out of context" because all these UA-camrs that get caught doing something horrific always jump to "out of context" it's like bruh we know the context. You're just trying to gaslight us into thinking there's something we're missing but there's not. What's the context Doc? Y'all were roleplaying and you didn't know she wasn't underage? Another classic go to 🙄
@@Vergil666. “they took my messages out of context.”
Okay, then show us the messages so we know the context.
“Lol, what, are we in second grade?”
Dude’s guilty AF
I'm glad I'm not in 2nd grade because he'd be in my dms too
@@biospark4758 chat logs are stored server side at Twitch, it's not rocket science.
Having to include the "jurisdiction" where the "not quite minor" lives means they are for certain under 18. It should absolutely destroy your career directed at interacting with children.
“Do you know the legal definition of sexting? Because I do” does not sound nearly as good as he thought it did. If you have to get THAT technical, you clearly did something wrong and are using legal loopholes to finagle your way through the system
this guy had to accuse himself of being a predator first to control the narrative and like jamari said used lots of legal grey area to turn this back on twitch, even after they paid off his contract. thats what sickening about old pedos, they are really that constructive to get what they want
Cody did you donut.
Legal age of consent doesn't mean not a minor
What?
@@TheAlamzynot 100% certain but i think it’s cause in some states 16 is the age of consent but technically you’re not an adult until you are 18. so while a 16 year old could consent in certain states they aren’t adults yet and morally it’s wrong imo
@@TheAlamzy the legal of age on consent depends on where you live. In the U.S. it can be as low as 16. He also said that the person was a minor which means they are under 18. Taking both of his comments into consideration, this means the person he was talking to was either 16 or 17.
I’ll like to mention that a lot of people maybe are confused about that, but doc is choosing his words very carefully to confused people. But at the end of the day the second a person mentions age of consent that means the person is under 18, that’s the only detail that actually matters here. He got away with it legally due to age of consent laws in which the user lives in. Which is why he brings that detail about.
Also “I didn’t sext that person by legal definition” does not mean I didn’t do anything wrong. It just means the law didnt classify it as sexting.
@@guillermoandrade307morally wrong ≠ lawfully wrong
11:23 this is what I’ve been saying the ENTIRE time. If it’s not as bad as doc says it is, why doesn’t the twitch employee just release the chat logs?
At the end of the day why is a 40 year old flirting texting a 17 year old it’s weird
@@iiheartevangaming Where is the "flirting" part? Did you even watch the video? Twitch themselves found nothing wrong in the chat logs, how is that considered "flirting" then?
@@fred6907 my bad “inappropriate” chats with a 17 year old
@@iiheartevangaming Yeah "my bad" indeed. Just making shit up about people is not the way to go kiddo.
Inappropriate could be a random fart joke, doesn't mean it was anything sexual. You're just guessing at this point.
@@fred6907 yea that’s definitely not what he meant and a grown man talking to a 17 year old is still crazy and defending it doesn’t look good on you either at the end of the day you had a daughter talking to a man in his late 30s at the time is very strange and should have never happened in the first place but let’s keep defending it because it’s ok for grown men to talk to highschool women👍🏽
I'm gonna be the minority here, looking at the comments, but let's say he was actually guilty of these stuff. Let's say, everythign is true that the Twitch guy says. He lost most if not all of his sponsors and partners during this process. He did suffer the consequences of his actions. But everybody acts like that this is the end of the road for him and there is no coming back. Which means that ppl think that if you make a mistake once, then you are done and you should be forgotten and outcasted from sociaty. I think this whole comeback for him probably is his way of saying he does not want to be cancelled because of one mistake. Let me just give you an example. Michael Vick literally killed dogs. multiple of them. I love dogs and I love Vick too. He spent his 2 years in prison, sacrificed 2 of his peak carreer years because he made multiple and horrible mistakes. But he did everything since then to right his wrongs and ppl slowly forgave him, networks are employ him, he is in a good place. I am definitely not saying that Doc didnt do anything bad. Looking at all these stuff he probably did. But for me it doesnt mean he should be in social purgatory for the rest of his life.
He’s made multiple mistakes.
1. Cheats on his wife constantly, we know about a few, there are most likely plenty. Once a cheater, always a cheater.
2. Talked to a minor inappropriately.
Now, number two should have you publicly ostracized no matter if they’re 17 or 13.
What’s the problem? What is the difference between 17 and 18? Legality, that’s it. Mentally? Nothing. 18 year olds still have, most of the time, a teenage mentality and still act like teenagers.
Most young adults will regret or feel uncomfortable with past relationships because of age gaps.
Look at Tana and Cody Ko; Tana was down and underage and later on in her life thought it was a terrible situation she put herself in. On the other hand, Cody should have known better but he did it anyways.
@@HomeboyMcGoo I dont understand your point. I started with let's say he is in fact guilty. I never argued that he shouldnt be punished for it. My argument was about a whole other thing
@@bencemester13 so what you are trying to say is if someone serves their time they should be forgiven?
If you talk to minors you will do it again. If you cheat on your significant other, you will do it again. He is a repeat offender. He will not stop. Give Doc an inch he *will* take a mile.
The severity of your offense determines the forgiveness. If a guy kills someone in cold blood, they should not be in society. If your prey on minors, you should not be in the general public. If you get in your car drunk and kill someone, you don’t deserve to be able to drive ever again. There needs to be consequences for bad behavior.
Technically inappropriate doesn't always mean sexual so only when the messages are released and all the evidence is shown can we really make a final verdict as the constant speculation without solid evidence is just incoherent at this point.
"Do you know what the legal definition of sexting is??? I DO!" While defending not being a pedo is CRAZYYYYY lmfao
He also pulled out the age of consent “in their jurisdiction” argument, which is heavily implying 16-17 because if they’re over the federal AoC of 18, there’s no need to include the second part of the statement 😂
@@chanr9531 like bruh is NOT beating the allegations lmfao
Bro just needs to release the dms. But he won't because what's in them is probably not great.
@RobGradyVO because it was brought up in the court case he won. It was a case about sexting. You think the definition wasn't brought up?
This is what bothers me about the haters. The obvious reasons for things are thrown out so they can find the worse possible way to paint it.
Professionals had access to all the evidence and chat logs. They went over it numerous times and fund nothing wrong. There were 3 possible charges they could have got him on and they could not even get 1 of them to stick.
The issue was reported to child safety, and they decided it wasn't something to follow up on.
But, rumor video makers who have access to zero evidence are controlling the narrative. These are people who make fake thumbnails showing people saying fake quotes to get views and likes.
They literally start off with a lie to get you to watch their videos. Clickbait.
They are who everyone believes? People who took the text that read "what are your plans for twitch-con?" And acted like it said "wanna fuck at twitch-con?" So they would get views.
Ima go ahead and trust the professionals here.
@Faminetheblack why does he need to release the dms and show you to clear his name?
The professionals who do this for a living didn't find anything wrong.
Why does he have to prove it to anyone else? Why don't people trust the professionals who had access to all the evidence and chat logs?
Why trust video creators who start with lies? Fake thumbnails showing people saying fake quotes.... all of them do it. They all LIE to get views.
I'll trust the professionals who have seen the evidence.
"unfiltered" as he is in character showing no recipts, not clarifying anything lmao
Dr. Disrespecting The Law
And the kids
@@ryancampbell1847lmao
“I even dated a 12 year old intentionally. Just to get a reaction from so called journalists, and boy did they react champs!”
Funny to see how different channels still trying to shit on Dr Disrispect, you guys can't win, can't you see how much support Doc is getting all over the internet, everyone is happy to have him back....
DoctorPDF is back
I didn’t know he was charged and convicted 😮 where did you find this info?
Bro called drake and asked for advice and drake thought about this 😂
Its funny. Dude is doing everything to defend himself..except actually release the dms. The one thing that will fully exonerate him. To all of his stans in denial still..why wont he?
NDA you simple person.
@@BruceLee-rc2dr Calling me a simple person while acting like that nda is still in play is hilarious. And even it was, which it isn't, anyone in his circumstance would 1000% release the dms regardless of being sued if there was nothing sus in the dms. But yeah man..I'm the dumb human here.
@@hotfunyunsop6196Don’t worry about doc sympathizers man. They don’t realize that NDA doesn’t protect criminal acts… Most likely a legal mandate was set from the case to keep the minor’s identity anonymous to prevent further harassment from the Doc’s fans.
@@BruceLee-rc2dr actually his NDA was nullified when one party decided to talk first. He is fine in that respect. The real issue is it's communications with a minor, you need their express permission to release the statements made. Which he is not in contact with that person for very obvious reasons. He was talking to kids privately and he admitted as much.
@@BruceLee-rc2dr all there is in your head is air
I think it's weird how he spun this narrative about how he "fooled" everyone with using the word inappropriate and minor in his tweet..like he had some kind of grand plan.
The gaslighting he's doing in his "explanation" around people who asks for the messages.."are u second grade"..it just doesn't suit him.
He was building up his speech as he was putting hard evidence on the table at the end ...witch it didn't..
Show the messages..how hard could it be??
He comes of as a narcissist not taking responsibility for jack.
He just doesn't get it.Thinking he's the victim.
I'm confused, does it not matter that the US judicial system determined nothing illegal happened?
Edit: And apparently, they also determined that nothing sexual was said in the messages
Why would we think the person was above the legal age limit when he himself said it was a minor.
If you have to bring your the age of consent to prove your argument, you already lost 😂
"but it was legal where they were" what a cope and he needs to just stfu at this point. This just makes him look desperate.
its not a cope, it's a fact. If trenny chrys tyson can have CP and talk about comming to america to 13 yo boys
Hey you can talk shi online all you want.
I'm glad that he cleared his name and Many people are back on his side, it warms my heart.
it doesnt work like that online, it doesnt matter where you are.
@@iknownot3336 lol he cleared up nothing, just deleted a post where he admitted to inappropriately messaging a minor.
@@iknownot3336going out of your way in every comment to defend this dude is insane 😂😂
@9:08 Nah dawg. You can't find any messages of me being inappropriate with a minor. With or without context/cherry picking messages. Insane that he thinks everyone does this kinda shit. What a creepy pedo.
I mean, he did get all of us lol twitch admitted there was no sexting too. They had it out for him and he paid the price. He legally can’t announce he’s going to sue Cody. But we can be sure that he is. Naw, we all fucked up here and clearly had it wrong
Facts
Yeah it’s gonna be hella weird seeing all these people calling him a ped for the foreseeable future while having no evidence to support the claim other than a guy who is going to be sued for his entire life’s earnings x10 lol. It’s like the new red scare. Everyone thinking everyone is a ped
Dr. Disrespect the age of consent
If he’s so innocent, he should sue these individuals for defamation because this man can’t do ANYTHING without it be somehow linked back to children
@@JM-qv1ljhe's gonna fail
And with that logic if he is guilty the judge would've sent him to jail... Think.
He has 30k viewers on a daily basis, I'd say he's doing just fine. NOTHING has changed, apart from the fact all the "journalists" fell for the lies.
"Unfiltered, realest mf in the industry.."
Okay old man
Who more real? ill wait...
He's playing a character, I'd argue that's not real 😎
If he’s so innocent why not just show the chat and give the context
4:55 doc is getting “technical” and saying technically a lot and getting very specific on some of these definitions and anytime someone does that it always means that they either did do it and are trying to distract people from thinking that he might not have done anything. Or, he did something and he is trying to make qualifying statements so he can say “technically I did this, this, and that, and technically that’s not illegal to say this, this, or that”. It always shows you are some what guilty and you are trying to seem innocent in some aspect.
He has to be specific because those journalists f****ng lied, did you even watch the video?
I kinda still question Cody tweet, Twitch actions (especially them after finding 17 year old hot tub streamers being allowed to do that type of content) and Doc making that stream and actions. I am gonna see how things on unfold with this one tbh.
EDIT: inappropriate behavior doesn't always mean it's something 18+ so while that doc tweet was self incriminating. Cody tweet looks more questionable as I am listening to Doc more. Cody did claim he sent lewdtexting to a minor so it did actually create that narrative from Cody original tweet which is why folks started using the pdf jokes/memes
The more he talks, the more he lies.
Cope
cope
Don't mind the PDF files, they're just defending their own
@@PeruvianPotato you mean the "pedophile" who went through legal processes and was told there was nothing sexual in the messages and no legal action was taken? that "pedophile"? I understand you just parrot what you see on the internet because youre stupid, but words have definitions. The device youre typing on has access to every definition of every word in the world. You should try looking up the definition of the word pedophile.
Dr Disrespect the new EDP of Twitch plus the same guy who stumbles onto his own words because he is his own enemy 🤔🥶
Bro hasn’t been on Twitch in 4 years y’know.
6:59 dude literally cried and said what if they read your diary lol they not like us
Age of Consent =/= Being an Adult
The thing he says that i notice is he said "twitch didnt investigate the age of consent for where the other person waa from" which leads me to assume she was very young but from a country like japan where the age of consent is 16😊
My friends would abandon me if I was PDFile...
Doc ain't one though, was cleared of all wrong doings by the cops, a judge, and Twitch's own team post incident. If he were he would have been charged and convicted by now. But he isn't and there is ZERO proof to say he is one. so he is innocent.
Bro forgot PDF's come in all shapes and sizes 10:18
Twitch fumbled the bag, judge saw no wrongdoing with the messages. Case closed. People are too nosey and love drama. I honestly don't care either way, i never really watched him and especially not after the original cheating drama.
Never watched any of his streams but im super invested in this drama lol
Started to notice the only people that still defend him are literal minors themselves that do not understand how bad this actually is, Most likely 13-15 year olds, Same way other victims of pdf files like with the kris tyson situation, said that when they were still young, they saw it as harmless fun and hanging out with your favourite youtuber, but when they got older they noticed how horrible it actually was,
I fully believe its the same with these fans and how they defend him saying he did nothing wrong because he apparently said so, They dont understand yet that this is absolutely horrible and have not formed mature thinking skills yet.
also doesnt help that his horrible explanation that makes 0% sense in every single universe that may exist, was done entirely in character, really shows how he is mostly trying to convince his fans that he did nothing wrong so he has a mob to defend him when allegations arise.
Doesn't matter if you believe him or not. What he is saying does make sense.
@@bryancollier704 Please explain how "oh but in her state she was over the age of consent!!111" when he himself lived in a state where she wasn't, because realize, that does automatically justify pdfiles contacting nigerian children for pictures, a country where the age of consent is 11+.
I cant believe me, A 18 year old who dropped out during 10th grade and has worked ever since has to explain to you how little sense anything he said makes when you yourself look around 26.
a 42 year old man talking sexual to 13 year olds should be a big red flag for any kid.
their parents must have failed them so hard to not teach them to not talk to strange old men.
Minors and other Pedo
@bryancollier704 no it doesn't. The dude literally couldn't stay consistent in his 20 minute statement. He just threw conspiracy theories at the wall and hoped something would stick. Then tried to distract people by harping on the fact that LEGALLY he did nothing wrong.
Anyone who's watched any sort of TCAP or actually took the time to look up the definitions of the things he was talking about would know that the bar for being criminally inappropriate with a minor is actually pretty high.
But just because he isn't criminally guilty, doesn't mean he isn't a creep.
The dude was messaging a girl that he could have been a father of.
He was 38 at the time. Just think about that. That's a dad messaging one of your high school friends inappropriately. No one in the real world would say that that is normal and he's not a creep
He already he admitted he effed up in his original tweet. I have no idea what possessed him to try and walk it back with this terrible statement but good lord.
Anyone not in their early twenties and below saw this for what it is
Sunday football and a jamari uploaded the gods have answered
@rb2022 bro it's just a comment chill
Im not gonna lie
I kinda expected Dr disrespect to be like "it was the character it wasn't me it was all an act"
If my private messages were released i wouldn't have a problem im not talking to kids 😂
Doc thinks since he’s not legally in trouble yet that he’s ok. He still admitted as a married adult that he was having inappropriate chats with a minor. But then again weirdos like weirdos so he’ll get away with it.