Some people don't have a good command of English and grammar. She should've said, she went to wake him up for school, he wasn't there. Woke him up, is past tense, meaning she already did it. Her grammar was off, that's all.
Did she mean they should go to jail before she gets her hands on them and does something to them for hurting her child and then she would go to jail? For harming the people who harmed her child? That's the way I took it..
And that'd probably more than likely what she meant when she said it We have to use our critical thinking skills when we look at things like this.. Great work 👏
I see this one differently. I think what Katie is saying is that if the person responsible for this isn’t held accountable, then if she finds them, she’s going to end up in jail for dealing with the person who did. But it’s pretty obvious who is responsible and I think Katie’s trying to sound like a protective mother, which we know she isn’t. Now, Chris, that’s a whole other story. IMO.
My question is, "Who are 'they' that they continuously mention?" IMO, they know who has Sebastian. Why does KP want "them" in jail, before she gets her hands on "them?" Who, Katie? Again, IMO.
What I find interesting with Katie’s interview on Reelz is that she says “Sebastian can be temperamental if he’s over stimulated or stressed out.” That being the case, why did she have him on so excursions on Feb25th? Was she deliberately causing Sebastian to act out so that she would have an excuse to b- - t him; therefore, causing something horrible to happen to hi ?
I wondered how Chris would answer that question if it was about Faith, his daughter. I would have asked that first, then asked the same about Sebastian. I agree about NG. She fed them answers, instead of asking open ended questions. The “interview “ accomplished absolutely nothing.
Katie means they better go to jail, so I dont. I think like a threat if she gets her hands on them first she will be the one put in jail for harming the person/s who harmed her boy? Imo
I don't recall an interview where I heard Katie say this. Was this something said off camera that was picked up later by the media or left out? Maybe I should listen to that particular interview again.
There is a Statement from Seth.. He "left California and went back to the States" an interesting thing to say for someone who is American. Why is California not part of the USA for him? I have said a similar thing as Katie.. Police better find the person who assaulted my grand daughter before I do, or I'll end up in jail. implied retaliation, not a fear of going to jail. If they don't get convicted and jailed I will take care of them myself... They won't get away with harming her. It isn't a hard statement to understand unless you are trying to twist it.
One of Katie’s first statements that doesn’t make sense to many is, “When I woke him up for school, he wasn’t there.” Thoughts?
Some people don't have a good command of English and grammar. She should've said, she went to wake him up for school, he wasn't there. Woke him up, is past tense, meaning she already did it. Her grammar was off, that's all.
Great work! Thank you!
First time seeing your content - really appreciate your breakdown of their cp&kp actual verbal interviews
Did she mean they should go to jail before she gets her hands on them and does something to them for hurting her child and then she would go to jail? For harming the people who harmed her child? That's the way I took it..
And that'd probably more than likely what she meant when she said it
We have to use our critical thinking skills when we look at things like this.. Great work 👏
I see this one differently. I think what Katie is saying is that if the person responsible for this isn’t held accountable, then if she finds them, she’s going to end up in jail for dealing with the person who did. But it’s pretty obvious who is responsible and I think Katie’s trying to sound like a protective mother, which we know she isn’t. Now, Chris, that’s a whole other story. IMO.
Right on
My question is, "Who are 'they' that they continuously mention?" IMO, they know who has Sebastian. Why does KP want "them" in jail, before she gets her hands on "them?" Who, Katie? Again, IMO.
💥💥💥
@@BrandyinIndy....
KP & CP will be the ones going to jail.... IMO
Fascinating analysis. Keep it coming! 👍
So on point
What I find interesting with Katie’s interview on Reelz is that she says “Sebastian can be temperamental if he’s over stimulated or stressed out.”
That being the case, why did she have him on so excursions on Feb25th? Was she deliberately causing Sebastian to act out so that she would have an excuse to b- - t him; therefore, causing something horrible to happen to hi ?
There was no 911 call. Chris called the Sheriff's department and there was no recording that we know of.
@@Emy53 except that perhaps all calls into the Sheriff’s Office are recorded… time will tell.
Imo, KP may have meant that if she goes after them, she will do something to the abductors that may not be nice/ legal.
💚
I wondered how Chris would answer that question if it was about Faith, his daughter. I would have asked that first, then asked the same about Sebastian. I agree about NG. She fed them answers, instead of asking open ended questions. The “interview “ accomplished absolutely nothing.
Interesting point of view
Both are trying to sound like lovi g caring parents. Lol 😂 how funny
I’miunsubbing to all the liars
Katie means they better go to jail, so I dont. I think like a threat if she gets her hands on them first she will be the one put in jail for harming the person/s who harmed her boy? Imo
I don't recall an interview where I heard Katie say this. Was this something said off camera that was picked up later by the media or left out? Maybe I should listen to that particular interview again.
There is a Statement from Seth.. He "left California and went back to the States" an interesting thing to say for someone who is American. Why is California not part of the USA for him?
I have said a similar thing as Katie.. Police better find the person who assaulted my grand daughter before I do, or I'll end up in jail. implied retaliation, not a fear of going to jail. If they don't get convicted and jailed I will take care of them myself... They won't get away with harming her. It isn't a hard statement to understand unless you are trying to twist it.
so you think who did it someone they know?
I am really enjoying your views and thoughts