AUSA 2019: GM Defense's Infantry Squad Vehicle (ISV) for U.S. Army

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 жов 2019
  • Shaun Connors talks to David Albritton, President, General Motors Defense LLC and Matthew Scrase, Performance Variant Manager, General Motors Defense LLC about GM Defense’s Infantry Squad Vehicle (ISV) proposal for the U.S. Army.
    Underpinned by Jane's verified and validated open source equipment, security and defence industry data, Jane's Data Analytics supports entity recognition, capability assessment and market analysis, find out more bit.ly/2x6tlQ9
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 195

  • @jameslynn7271
    @jameslynn7271 4 роки тому +102

    What people miss about this program is the operational requirement that it is supposed to fit. It is for rapid mobility for Airborne/ Light Infantry units to move from the DZ/ LZ to the objective in a Air Defense Heavy environment. It is not made for combat patrols or for a large force on force operation. It is a taxi service, so the vehicles need to be cheap, light, and fast.

    • @saltymonke3682
      @saltymonke3682 4 роки тому +9

      Exactly, JLTV is good but also heavier for a light Airborne/SOF raid/Air assault operation.

    • @multimossad
      @multimossad 4 роки тому +8

      I remember that the Rangers used Land Rivers around the 90s / 2000 not sure , so this would be something like the british vehicle , cheap , light and with spare parts in the civilian market.

    • @jameslynn7271
      @jameslynn7271 4 роки тому +3

      @@multimossad they got the Mercedes truck not too long ago.

    • @swmark78
      @swmark78 4 роки тому +7

      The problem with that is there is no such think as what it's built for. You have to assume enemy forces will be present and they'll have the least common denominator of AKs, LMGs and RPGs.

    • @Veldtian1
      @Veldtian1 4 роки тому

      @@swmark78 exactamundo.

  • @VDawg-cr1gb
    @VDawg-cr1gb 4 роки тому +18

    Judging from the comments, most people really don’t understand the role of this vehicle at all. 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @45obiwan
    @45obiwan 4 роки тому +20

    They need to send one to Montana and let me put it through the works.

  • @QuantumAscension1
    @QuantumAscension1 4 роки тому +13

    mount a GAU-19 .50 rotary cannon on the back and you've got yourself an M12 Warthog, lol

    • @tomatos9445
      @tomatos9445 4 роки тому +1

      were going to need this for when the Terminators come.

  • @anthonythomas1735
    @anthonythomas1735 4 роки тому +11

    It's very clear to see the dust being kicked up is entering the cab, I sincerely hope that they put substantial mud guards on the final product, I wouldn't want to be in it over dusty terrain, especially the rear seats area. If its a prototype then I am sure that will be addressed, otherwise there are going to be some very miserable people using colourful language.

    • @miletello1
      @miletello1 4 роки тому +2

      Private, get in the back.

  • @miketaylor5212
    @miketaylor5212 4 роки тому +4

    i have seen the heavy troop vehicles they are mine rsistant i think these are for rougher terrain where those behemoths wont be able to go.

  • @shawnblanchette7228
    @shawnblanchette7228 4 роки тому +3

    That "truck" is awesome!

  • @whiskeyactual.
    @whiskeyactual. 3 роки тому

    I saw the Flyer Defense ISV on the sling load pad at BAF like a month and a half ago. It's already here in theater and probably was delivered to some ODA or other SOF element. So I'm guessing GM didn't get the contract?

  • @ap1hondaking
    @ap1hondaking 3 роки тому +1

    Yeah my Hummer H3 is solid rear axle...it is great!

  • @Anolbea
    @Anolbea 4 роки тому +14

    Them seats behind the back axle is going to be a shit place to be.

    • @miletello1
      @miletello1 4 роки тому +2

      Uh private, what are you doing? Get to the back!

    • @JT-nn8nj
      @JT-nn8nj 3 роки тому +1

      I volunteered to sit back there, it’s not awful. And we went through some pretty good mud puddles, we actually barely got any on us. Not too bad

  • @Sloba1992
    @Sloba1992 3 роки тому +1

    Would be nice to see regular cab with flatbed option

  • @manchurob6432
    @manchurob6432 3 роки тому +2

    As an outdoorsman, that looks fun.....if the weather is right. As an old school Infantryman, it looks like nothing short of a death trap. I'd rather walk.

  • @davidapacjr1989
    @davidapacjr1989 4 роки тому +3

    Could use some light armor to keep the dust out, and bullets. (Would also look cooler.

  • @chippledon1
    @chippledon1 4 роки тому +4

    Mostly a "parts bin" vehicle - which is fine. Keeps costs down so you can make available large numbers of them. And it does what it's supposed to do. A very rudimentary, single-purpose mission: to transport an infantry squad. However, once the squad is dismounted, what do you do w/the vehicle?

    • @laserbrain7774
      @laserbrain7774 4 роки тому +1

      mount a gau-19 on it and sell it in the ME

    • @NPSpad
      @NPSpad 3 роки тому +1

      Chop block and drip pan

  • @lay1back
    @lay1back 4 роки тому

    This is assuming there is open terrain, or roads. And to carry a battalion, it will require about 120 vehicles, 50 mechanics, parts supply, fuel supply. And will make troops more vulnerable to enemy fire because they are concentrated.

  • @whomagoose6897
    @whomagoose6897 4 роки тому +3

    I know things change. But I will always miss that M-151 Jeep. It's a classic that nothing else can compare.

    • @wipatriot510
      @wipatriot510 4 роки тому

      We had them in the RoK in 82-83...

  • @TTVToxic-yu5ov
    @TTVToxic-yu5ov 4 роки тому +2

    A Colorado that runs on JP-8? Yes please!!!

  • @tomcrouchman
    @tomcrouchman 4 роки тому +1

    Looks like a useful vehicle for the Military.

  • @williamkenny6383
    @williamkenny6383 4 роки тому +1

    6:26 Did he say 286hp? I thought it was barely 200hp

  • @matthewjacobs141
    @matthewjacobs141 4 роки тому

    Does it come with a roof and doors

  • @eliasgonzalez125
    @eliasgonzalez125 4 роки тому +1

    They should use that front end on a Colorado based SUV. I would definitely buy it.

  • @imnotusingmyrealname4566
    @imnotusingmyrealname4566 3 роки тому +1

    Should've been the 3.0 Duramax, although that one might just be too new to use for the military.

  • @1337flite
    @1337flite 3 роки тому +1

    Seating layout looks a bit crap, doesn't look like it has much stowage for POL, water, ammo, batteries rations, maintenance and recvoery equipment, defense stores, etc etc. Yes the raised. roof section above the rear seats might be used for lighter stuff, e.g. the cam net, but I suspect any heavy stores, POL, water up there would mess with the center of gravity.
    Sure a second class ride is better than a first class march, but as shown it doesn't look like there's been much thought about the requirements for living and operating in the field.
    Basically it looks like it can carry the 9 grunts, their personel equipment and that's it - and they don't event have racks for their personel weapons by the look of it.
    I suspect once it gets to the field it won't have enough growth in it to accomodate real battlefield needs and may end up becomng a 6 man troop carrier to allow for all the stores and equipment actually required in the field. Lucky it is a fairly modular looking build.

  • @Residentanimalz
    @Residentanimalz 4 роки тому +2

    how does it stop incoming rounds? well Bob, once you get shot at you stop driving, turn off the ignition, exit the vehicle, and then use your buddies to flip the vehicle over and fire from behind. Good luck.

  • @therustyshack1
    @therustyshack1 4 роки тому +3

    Greatest looking death trap ever.

  • @algnojewski969
    @algnojewski969 3 місяці тому

    I’m guessing nobody will want to just hang out at the truck in truly winter conditions since it has no appearance of weather shelter
    Might as well start planning for 8 man squads since you’re never going to just leave a vehicle unattended or even 6 man squads if the truck is also your medium/heavy gun platform. I guess you could get strap hangers for those positions but you still don’t have the seating for your squad at that point

  • @shawntravelstheworld911
    @shawntravelstheworld911 4 роки тому

    Why does it have a Ford Fusion front end.

  • @paladin11C40
    @paladin11C40 4 роки тому +5

    Now the enemy only needs a few claymore mines on the sides of buildings and tree to take out the Soldiers in the vehicles. I can see this being used for fast attack to cover a lot of real estate quickly after insertion, but not for regular patrol work where there is an expectation of military forces coming and going from a FOB.

    • @VandalAudi
      @VandalAudi 4 роки тому +1

      I think they’re aiming for a vehicle to replace the Humvees as Light vehicles to cover a lot of real estate with better fuel milage and compatibility with commercial grade spare parts, probably like the old Jeeps. Patrol duties are now mostly delegated to the MRAPs like the JLTV who got more survivability against IEDs and mines but bulkier.

    • @jameslynn7271
      @jameslynn7271 4 роки тому +2

      that's all it's supposed to be used for. Move quickly from the DZ to get to the last tactical mile where they go in on foot. it's not supposed to be an assault vehicle or a patrol vehicle.

    • @yfelwulf
      @yfelwulf 4 роки тому +1

      The Hummer a light truck was lambasted by the press for no protection for the Dupes how did they get here.

  • @iguanaamphibioustruck7352
    @iguanaamphibioustruck7352 4 роки тому

    Hi Shaun, your looking good. If you want to go "off road" then go to a gravel plant and climb the three quarter minus pile, up and down. That is the natural angle of repose. If you cannot do that, then, you cannot stay with the soldiers. You can provide transport to the "end of the road" . A ledge, a swamp with cat tails, a snow bank, fallen timber, tall beach grass, willows, sage brush, mesquite, deep snow, mud or blow sand will reject you.
    Iguana
    Ps I like the comment "open to entertaining"

  • @vinniedayhikerb4977
    @vinniedayhikerb4977 4 роки тому

    Basically its a high tech Jeep........ Hopefully they can simplify the transmission and put durability back into the vehicle with simple maintenance and shorter parts lists to keep the logistics side in check. Yeah I work at a chevy dealer...parts guy

  • @johnhopkins6260
    @johnhopkins6260 4 роки тому +7

    Never never concentrate mobile troops in one target; Disperse them with a hoard/swarm of Polaris quads.

  • @Erin-Thor
    @Erin-Thor 4 роки тому

    Why isn’t reliability an issue? A military vehicle is moot if it can’t get home?

  • @johnnylogan22
    @johnnylogan22 4 роки тому +11

    You need to bring your manufacturing back to the US and make us happy and do a better job for the American people before we think about giving you any defense contracts GM...
    Americans are watching

    • @apachieeeshortbow8909
      @apachieeeshortbow8909 3 роки тому

      Can't contract non-US companies for defense item. The entire powertrain is produced in US + the frame.

  • @stevedaly2676
    @stevedaly2676 4 роки тому

    It looks fun but it doesn't offer much protection from small arms fire.

  • @JackManiaky
    @JackManiaky Рік тому

    Cool but can you throw an LS into it?

  • @JustforFun-ki6fk
    @JustforFun-ki6fk 4 роки тому +2

    This guy answering the questions sounds like a freakin robot !. Lol.

  • @Re.Configured
    @Re.Configured 3 роки тому

    Imagine if they made a variant of this that replaces the rear 4 seats with a full 360 degree swivel turret that could mount a minigun or perhaps someday a railgun lol

  • @agentanderson1383
    @agentanderson1383 4 роки тому

    fine on flat hard surfaces, i need light armor, 50 cal auto targeting turret , more of a rock climbing suspension! needs improvement

  • @yfelwulf
    @yfelwulf 4 роки тому +1

    The Hummer a light truck was lambasted by the press for no protection for the Dupes how did they get here.

  • @paulleepoy7236
    @paulleepoy7236 4 роки тому

    Canada needs to collect on these💼

  • @PBVader
    @PBVader 4 роки тому

    This shows we need not go into regen mode while on exfil from the DMZ.

  • @ArmonMitchell
    @ArmonMitchell 4 роки тому +9

    Call me when Toyota has a model

  • @abysmith9083
    @abysmith9083 4 роки тому +1

    so basically it is a chevy pick up without doors...

  • @MrTesedgar
    @MrTesedgar 4 роки тому +1

    That Colorado is tune and deleted to the max black smoke I wonder if the EPA is gonna shut them down .🤔🤔🤔

    • @Chironex_Fleckeri
      @Chironex_Fleckeri 4 роки тому

      The EPA cant touch US mil projects, the fuck are you on about? Lmao

  • @screamingeagle11b
    @screamingeagle11b 4 роки тому +1

    The early stages of the halo vehicles

  • @freidrichnietzsche6643
    @freidrichnietzsche6643 5 місяців тому

    I wonder what the maximum payload for this little rig actually is? 9 bodies, gear, ammo, fuel... that'll add up fast.

  • @jawneelogik5744
    @jawneelogik5744 4 роки тому

    Don't want to sit anywhere other than the front row seats!

  • @donkoh5738
    @donkoh5738 4 роки тому

    maybe further ponder a configuration including say, 6x slant-launched Hellfire loadout? Laser-guided 76mm rocket loadout ?

    • @laserbrain7774
      @laserbrain7774 4 роки тому

      GAU-19

    • @donkoh5738
      @donkoh5738 4 роки тому

      Yes, that too, but I was pondering something also with more 'full-capacity, cost-effective force-multiplication' special capabilities for the warfighter to offser and rebalance various firepower imbalances, or disadvantages shall we say .

    • @laserbrain7774
      @laserbrain7774 4 роки тому

      @@donkoh5738 M-29 davy crockett then.

    • @donkoh5738
      @donkoh5738 4 роки тому

      @@laserbrain7774 twin round ? deal

  • @shawntravelstheworld911
    @shawntravelstheworld911 4 роки тому

    Where is the armor.

  • @scottmason2094
    @scottmason2094 4 роки тому +2

    I don’t know what they are charging for this, but I will built it for half the cost

  • @adminuser9102
    @adminuser9102 4 роки тому

    Actually Guns and Green Paint make many Americans Proud.

  • @VictoriaAlfredSmythe
    @VictoriaAlfredSmythe 6 місяців тому +1

    thank you from manhattan ©2024

  • @Jay121
    @Jay121 4 роки тому

    It would appear the next large scale conventional war will be fought with asymmetric warfare weapons.

  • @twistedhippie7608
    @twistedhippie7608 4 роки тому

    Use the Jeep Truck with a Cummins turbo

  • @importantname
    @importantname 4 роки тому +2

    if you only drive it on roads and tracks - you are not showing what troops will do to it.

    • @PSC4.1
      @PSC4.1 4 роки тому

      David Boson fr, they need to try going off-road not on dirt or gravel roads

    • @patelivid1637
      @patelivid1637 4 роки тому

      That’s what they do, the special forces.

  • @bluemeriadoc
    @bluemeriadoc 2 роки тому

    engine cracks and overheats in desert

  • @vancruising
    @vancruising 4 роки тому +1

    kinda looks like unsc troop carrier.

  • @carlwesternut2434
    @carlwesternut2434 4 роки тому

    Bog standard leaf springs... a cheaper , more reliable suspension system for a fast taxi.

  • @philliplopez8745
    @philliplopez8745 4 роки тому

    Ya , but your not Oskosh are ya !

  • @Adam-su2jj
    @Adam-su2jj 4 роки тому

    So it's a Colorado with a few mods.

  • @buildindian8169
    @buildindian8169 4 роки тому +1

    It’s an H3 hummer, stripped out and beefed up to look tactical.

    • @miletello1
      @miletello1 4 роки тому +2

      Uh no....its a Colorado ZR2, stripped down to look tactical.

  • @MegaAgill
    @MegaAgill 4 роки тому +5

    Another speciality vehicle for a special price. Thanks taxpayers!

  • @jameswells554
    @jameswells554 4 роки тому

    Tell ya what. Put on the gear, with full combat load, and ride around in the bitch for a few days, then re-do the seats. Do have any friggin clue how much shit we have to wear? What about the space taken up by radio mounts, BFT, CROWS, water cans, fuel cans, extra batteries for the radios, extra ammo, and chow inside the crew compartment?

  • @everythingman987
    @everythingman987 4 роки тому +1

    Should've given it independent rear suspension.

  • @JustforFun-ki6fk
    @JustforFun-ki6fk 4 роки тому

    Does it come with a machine gun ? And anti tank missle launcher ?. Lmmfao!

  • @t_sixtyfivex_wing8787
    @t_sixtyfivex_wing8787 4 роки тому

    It s ford ranger army version.

  • @nitroxide17
    @nitroxide17 4 роки тому +6

    these interview questions aren't good

    • @pradeepkumar-qo8lu
      @pradeepkumar-qo8lu 4 роки тому +1

      Some regarding the share holder and environment were not really required but the rest were fine

    • @PBVader
      @PBVader 4 роки тому

      Wrong, this is soft disclosure. EPA needs its peepee slapped. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

    • @Glove513
      @Glove513 3 роки тому

      Government contracts for emergency vehicles come without the emissions systems. That’s the case for police, fire, ambulance and military vehicles. That said, they could probably decrease harmful emissions and increase range as well as engine life with an HHO system...but they won’t do it.

  • @swmark78
    @swmark78 4 роки тому +2

    There seems to be something missing. Hmmm, what could it be?
    Oh yeah, armor. Because apparently nothing has been learned since the early 90s about driving unarmored vehicles in possible combat (or definite combat) situations.

    • @Veldtian1
      @Veldtian1 4 роки тому

      Yeah they gonna dodge that 200 round stream of PKM rounds with the vehicles AGILITY and SPEED, they could put virtually weightless Dyneema panels all over it, I just don't get it.

    • @swmark78
      @swmark78 4 роки тому

      @@Veldtian1 They are desperate trying to believe the last 25 years didn't happen.
      If pressed they would probably spout the unless SOCOM mantra of "Armor the person, not the vehicle". Which didn't help in Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan or anywhere else people actually shoot back.

  • @hellenicculture8169
    @hellenicculture8169 4 роки тому

    with out any armor personel is not ok!

  • @Skydiver139
    @Skydiver139 4 роки тому +2

    South African Combat History has shown that that concrpt is doomed to fail... It needs armour and it has ZERO mine and IED protection... Otherwise.. Maybe a workable idea!... For LRRP behind enemy lines... Yes, maybe!

    • @SecretAgentXD1
      @SecretAgentXD1 3 роки тому +1

      This is just a taxi for airborne infantry. Rather than risk overflying a potentially air defense filled area, drop the paratroopers further away, load them onto this, and let them drive, rather than walk, to the objective

  • @whereswaldo5740
    @whereswaldo5740 6 місяців тому

    What he should have said after the shareholder comment was. With that accent I can tell you’re not from around here. So that was a silly question. We make war stuff.

  • @jesseterrell9354
    @jesseterrell9354 3 роки тому

    Somewhere there is a pkm machine gun smiling at the chance to riddle everyone in this thing with 7.62x54R. Fucking military man sure they say it’s not for frontline use but that’s why they said about the hmmv too

  • @szymonmacieja
    @szymonmacieja 4 роки тому

    Super car.

  • @alikanmaz1871
    @alikanmaz1871 4 роки тому

    Bununla ancak afrikada doğa gezilerine gidilir

  • @c431inf
    @c431inf 4 роки тому

    Lol and it will get to an actual line unit in 10 years , first it has to go to the units that will not deploy

  • @richardmartin3243
    @richardmartin3243 4 роки тому +1

    Need to be able to sell it to the American people

  • @maminbanbhan
    @maminbanbhan 4 роки тому

    Amazing GM going for Sahara only as SAS did ages ago

  • @adama5668
    @adama5668 4 роки тому

    no mine or armor protection for modern warfare=insane idea.

    • @lobushell
      @lobushell 4 роки тому

      Not really .This is meant for ofensive manuevers for special force units. At the same time it also gives you the advantage easy shooting while moving but that is for pro's

  • @75thteaster54
    @75thteaster54 4 роки тому

    Ol FUCK the soldiers will never get on there mission if there driving a GM vehicle, goddam WHHHHYYYYYYY

  • @713devereux
    @713devereux 4 роки тому +8

    I say this as veteran at end day this nothing more than over priced light utility vehicle and no idea what this would cost the U.S. taxpayer.

    • @michaelstewart3042
      @michaelstewart3042 4 роки тому

      Bullet proof doors for small arms looks to open to protect troops

  • @renehinojosa1962
    @renehinojosa1962 4 роки тому

    It seems these vehicles are being manufactured for whatever environment we are going to invade/operate in. My guess is the Middle East, these vehicles seemed designed for that purpose.
    That being said, where's the protective armor!?!

  • @MrGA555
    @MrGA555 Рік тому +1

    You're not fooling anyone. That's a Warthog

  • @iceman11sdm
    @iceman11sdm 4 роки тому

    Flat bottom so you are F$&@ed if you hit any type of IED, small gun mounts so maybe a 240 at best, small engine for 9 troops and all their gear, limited storage for ammo, food, water, and weapon system. Maybe an SF vehicle but not for a regular squad that is 11-13 people!

  • @garyorrock1729
    @garyorrock1729 Рік тому

    When will the EV be available?

  • @bonkersblock
    @bonkersblock 4 роки тому

    Fucking bullet magnet! Maybe for special forces, not for regular troop transport..

  • @TheAnnoyingBoss
    @TheAnnoyingBoss 3 роки тому

    Military doesn't have to listen to the epa. That tells you the epa makes vehicles more unreliable and dangerous as they age

  • @narasak8463
    @narasak8463 4 роки тому

    🙏🙏🙏❤️🤟👏🇹🇭

  • @t4sturm
    @t4sturm 4 роки тому

    SOOOOOOOO? bad shooting is it's protection? Maybe a sign that says "don't shoot at us"LOL

  • @JustforFun-ki6fk
    @JustforFun-ki6fk 4 роки тому

    Watch the movie death race 2000 thats what the U. S. Is becoming !

  • @nickpelentsov9229
    @nickpelentsov9229 4 роки тому +1

    sorry that guy doesnt have a clue, hes a car salesman, vague fancy words, my opinion, leaf axles are simplicity, thats all, in 4 wheeling, combat, strut shocks, can give out, thats it...

  • @MikeBenko
    @MikeBenko 4 роки тому +1

    Literally everything this is meant to do can be done by run of the mill Toyotas and Nissans for literally 1/10 of the cost of this thing. This is nothing but a political gift from Congress to GM. Keep in mind these things cost 330k a unit. This piece of shit is why you can't have affordable healthcare, bridges that aren't collapsing, veterans who aren't left living on the streets or for that matter gear that troops actually need.

  • @kalbs89
    @kalbs89 4 роки тому

    ....it’s a Colorado with the doors removed

  • @jeffstone7912
    @jeffstone7912 4 роки тому

    The interviewer asks some pretty stupid questions. As if there’s a problem with a solid rear axle.

  • @marksmith8732
    @marksmith8732 4 роки тому

    Good to see a black man in that high of a position, just shows you how much progress has been made .the vehicle reminds me of the british supercat.

    • @miletello1
      @miletello1 4 роки тому +1

      Except this progress is nothing new. 😒

  • @milkeywhey2998
    @milkeywhey2998 4 роки тому +1

    Polaris made it better

  • @psimasters
    @psimasters 4 роки тому

    Замучаются пыль глотать...

  • @frankedgar6694
    @frankedgar6694 2 роки тому

    I wonder if the speaker would have been as impressed if he’d shown up on a rainy day in February. Imagine sitting in a wet seat in 40 degree weather. Imagine being the guy sitting in the middle back seat. You start taking incoming fire. The two outside guys are killed. How quickly can you get out? This thing looks like pork barrel spending. It’ll probably be great for going to the range on post. Not sure I’d want to be in it outside the wire. What about artillery and/or biological weapons? What about IED’s. Did we learn nothing in Iraq?

  • @jasestrong
    @jasestrong 4 роки тому

    Based on the Chevy Colorado ZR2, no thank you for 9 troops

  • @SEC001
    @SEC001 4 роки тому +1

    No footage of this thing stacked with dudes in full gear?
    D I S A P P O I N T M E N T
    *It's still cool though!*

  • @MB-qw1eb
    @MB-qw1eb 8 місяців тому

    Hope these don’t see combat.