From what I see the 3rd generation (T6) brings not much to the table. They could have waited a while longer (1-2 years) perfect more their tehnology and put on the market a vacuum with a docking base that cleans itself (like the iRobot Roomba i7+), or that mops better (maybe a vibrating or rotating mop to it's «tale» that can be added/removed when needed to mop). They could have very easily upgraded the 2nd generation software more, to remember more maps/floors and to ad that detailed zone cleaning (kitchen, bedrooom, etc). If the robot couldn't insert those zones itself they could have easily done the map customisable and allow clients to draw their zones. I have a 2nd generation Roborock and i see no reason for me to upgrade to Roborock T6. You can make small holles to the 2nd generation mop filters and whater poors faster + i add cleaning solution (both for tile floor or laminated depending what i am clening) and with my method it is perfect. I ONLY HOPE THAT THEY WILL NOT SABOTAGE UNPORPOUSE their old version. By redoucing sound the 3rd generation could vacuum not so good as the 2nd (we will see) and they could send faulty updates that in time could make 2nd generation go worst than the 3rd (reduce vacuum power, worst orientation, etc). Apple (those thiefs) did that to their iphones and i am sure many companies do that too.
I thought as much too, apart from a little insignificant improvement there is nothing much compare to the previous generations. Thanks for the wonderful comment though😘😘
Yes, you have right. I have same 2nd generation. Noise reduction, what to do, doesn't need it. But rooms (zones) and saving maps for normal or wet cleaning can be solved with just SW. When I am using normal cleaning my Roborock can go everywhere, but when I am using MOP, then everytime I need choose 3 areas where I have carpets (no go zones). This is not reason for investition to next generation.
Price?
From what I see the 3rd generation (T6) brings not much to the table.
They could have waited a while longer (1-2 years) perfect more their
tehnology and put on the market a vacuum with a docking base that cleans
itself (like the iRobot Roomba i7+), or that mops better (maybe a
vibrating or rotating mop to it's «tale» that can be added/removed when
needed to mop). They could have very easily upgraded the 2nd generation
software more, to remember more maps/floors and to ad that detailed zone
cleaning (kitchen, bedrooom, etc). If the robot couldn't insert those
zones itself they could have easily done the map customisable and allow
clients to draw their zones. I have a 2nd generation Roborock and i see
no reason for me to upgrade to Roborock T6. You can make small holles to
the 2nd generation mop filters and whater poors faster + i add cleaning
solution (both for tile floor or laminated depending what i am clening)
and with my method it is perfect. I ONLY HOPE THAT THEY WILL NOT
SABOTAGE UNPORPOUSE their old version. By redoucing sound the 3rd
generation could vacuum not so good as the 2nd (we will see) and they
could send faulty updates that in time could make 2nd generation go
worst than the 3rd (reduce vacuum power, worst orientation, etc). Apple
(those thiefs) did that to their iphones and i am sure many companies do
that too.
I thought as much too, apart from a little insignificant improvement there is nothing much compare to the previous generations. Thanks for the wonderful comment though😘😘
Yes, you have right. I have same 2nd generation. Noise reduction, what to do, doesn't need it. But rooms (zones) and saving maps for normal or wet cleaning can be solved with just SW. When I am using normal cleaning my Roborock can go everywhere, but when I am using MOP, then everytime I need choose 3 areas where I have carpets (no go zones). This is not reason for investition to next generation.