‘I’m Struggling With That Argument’: KBJ Questions Special Counsel Lawyer On Trump Immunity

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 кві 2024
  • On Thursday, Special Counsel Attorney Michael Dreeben was questioned by Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on the immunity of former President Trump in the oral arguments of Trump v. United States.
    Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
    account.forbes.com/membership...
    Stay Connected
    Forbes on Facebook: forbes
    Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
    Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
    More From Forbes: forbes.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 350

  • @mariongranbruheim4090
    @mariongranbruheim4090 20 днів тому +82

    A woman who doesn't know what a woman is gets to contribute to decide one of the most important questions on this planet. Why do I not feel reassured? 😖

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @NorCalNeel
    @NorCalNeel 20 днів тому +70

    The Woman judge who can’t define what a woman is, is helping the prosecution should’ve been the headline

    • @alexh1524
      @alexh1524 19 днів тому

      She may not be able to define what is a woman but she can sure point out the idiocy and fallacy of Trump claiming absolute Presidential immunity vis-a-vis the US Constitution.

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

    • @jasonbeck7579
      @jasonbeck7579 18 днів тому

      @@alexh1524 hahahahahahahahahaha

    • @marigee3741
      @marigee3741 18 днів тому

      @@alexh1524but that’s not what she is doing, so…

    • @debrasnipes7431
      @debrasnipes7431 17 днів тому +1

      @@alexh1524She’s doing the absolute opposite. lol

  • @pjones1403
    @pjones1403 20 днів тому +66

    This is the judge that your corrupt Congress and senate allowed to be placed on the bench who could not define what a woman is? Wow! She’s pathetic!

    • @user-ti3fe6gg4s
      @user-ti3fe6gg4s 20 днів тому

      I never agreed with her appointment. Your side is corrupt also . The senate is dem. Congress is gop .

    • @mangos2888
      @mangos2888 20 днів тому +2

      No, this is the judge with logic and sound reasoning!

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @juliofuentes3782
    @juliofuentes3782 20 днів тому +85

    She struggles not knowing what a woman is. How the hell did she get appointed? That's right, that's our DEI at work

    • @mangos2888
      @mangos2888 20 днів тому

      She's 1,000 time better than Thomas!

    • @johntaylor8548
      @johntaylor8548 20 днів тому +4

      @@mangos2888 that not even possible to say ,

    • @juliofuentes3782
      @juliofuentes3782 19 днів тому +1

      She can't give you the definition of what is a woman. Right, 1,000 time better. You might want to research her track records as a judge before she was DEI to the Supreme Court. 🤔

    • @Daniel-nr2uf
      @Daniel-nr2uf 19 днів тому

      @@mangos2888obviously many would disagree with you

    • @mangos2888
      @mangos2888 19 днів тому

      @@johntaylor8548 It's absolutely true!

  • @ClaudiaSnyder-id9xj
    @ClaudiaSnyder-id9xj 20 днів тому +47

    Why don't they ask why they brought the prosecutions until now that he is running as president?

    • @AE-yt4lx
      @AE-yt4lx 20 днів тому

      Because they realized that the devil is not going away. They have taken him lightly, suffered the fool for too long.

    • @shreder75
      @shreder75 20 днів тому +2

      ​@@AE-yt4lx keep cashing those fed checks, fedbot

    • @bullmoose5574
      @bullmoose5574 20 днів тому +1

      ​@AE-yt4lx yes, your right, it is purely political.

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

    • @mangos2888
      @mangos2888 13 днів тому

      You don't just decide to bring charges to the Supreme court....that's not the starting point....ever.

  • @bacsi19461
    @bacsi19461 20 днів тому +71

    Has she learned what a woman is? Should never got away with that and now she will have some controll o er those of us who are sane.

    • @harryfarber6435
      @harryfarber6435 20 днів тому +1

      She called Barry and told him that he better lawyer up

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

    • @ThomasNiemann-qe5fo
      @ThomasNiemann-qe5fo 18 днів тому +2

      For any one with a brain, her hesistance in answering the question"what is a woman?" is rooted in the desire to include trabs women. The question deserves a well-thought and theoretical answer.

    • @mangos2888
      @mangos2888 13 днів тому

      ​@@ThomasNiemann-qe5foAgreed, and Forbes commetors don't have one, and Forbes isn't cleaning it up. They're completely off the rails....

  • @darrellepickering8433
    @darrellepickering8433 20 днів тому +33

    If she can't describe a woman, how the hell can she call herself a judge?

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

    • @lisabaltzer4190
      @lisabaltzer4190 16 днів тому +3

      Affirmative Action appointment.

  • @TrumpWon-uc7hi
    @TrumpWon-uc7hi 20 днів тому +51

    Jackson DEI 💩 MAGA 🇺🇲 FJB

    • @reneem3895
      @reneem3895 20 днів тому

      KBJ is more qualified than anyone else on the SCOTUS. Check her resume.
      If anyone is a DEI hire, it would be AKB. She never served as a judge or won any meaningful case as a lawyer. Do the research & get back to me. Bet you won’t admit you’re wrong & bigoted.

    • @killmongerwasrightong3954
      @killmongerwasrightong3954 20 днів тому +1

      You think being racist helps you win elections? Watch and see

    • @killmongerwasrightong3954
      @killmongerwasrightong3954 20 днів тому +3

      You wanna call her the n word we see that and we will respond accordingly

    • @reneem3895
      @reneem3895 20 днів тому

      @@killmongerwasrightong3954They just can’t stand that a POC is in any position of power. Makes them feel inferior.

    • @ac9559
      @ac9559 20 днів тому +5

      ​​ stupid drunk and angry is no way to go through life son@@killmongerwasrightong3954

  • @user-et6se3hl1v
    @user-et6se3hl1v 20 днів тому +10

    If we can’t define what a woman is, can we define if it’s a man or a woman who committed a crime in a country we have no idea who is running it. And what is a crime if there is no justice or impartial jury???

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @guitarzan73
    @guitarzan73 20 днів тому +31

    Q-"What is a woman?"
    KBJ="I don't understand the question."

    • @Lace71421
      @Lace71421 20 днів тому +2

      There’s a lot more than that she doesn’t understand, obviously.

    • @luciboras
      @luciboras 20 днів тому

      What was the intend of the questioner for asking the definition "woman"? Genital, ideas, womb-man or how would define

    • @mangos2888
      @mangos2888 20 днів тому

      That's not before the judge today

    • @Lace71421
      @Lace71421 19 днів тому

      @@luciboras to prove credibility and sanity which, sadly, didn’t happen.

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @berfderfington6947
    @berfderfington6947 20 днів тому +12

    She struggles with the most simple questions.... like "What is a Woman?

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @kevinharrah2260
    @kevinharrah2260 20 днів тому +51

    She sounded like a triggered TDS liberal college student today live

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @et1016
    @et1016 20 днів тому +33

    Bless her heart. I bet she struggles with a lot of things. 😂

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

    • @micdom43
      @micdom43 13 днів тому

      😂

  • @jbsang54
    @jbsang54 20 днів тому +33

    This woman can't even define a woman let alone make a single argument.

    • @reneem3895
      @reneem3895 20 днів тому +1

      The other woman didn’t know there were three branches of government. That is way more disturbing.

    • @rikeshpr85
      @rikeshpr85 20 днів тому +1

      ​@reneem3895 like AOC?

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @Richard-xc3jd
    @Richard-xc3jd 20 днів тому +10

    The Supreme Court will ponder, not decide . They demanded they, and no one could make the correct decision. They won't make a decision. Maybe send it back down to a lower court . Oh, woe , and alas, a district court might know Constitutional law . We will ponder .

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @Ultrajamz
    @Ultrajamz 20 днів тому +82

    KBJ isn’t a biologist, so we expect many struggles ahead.

    • @texasrepojoe6755
      @texasrepojoe6755 20 днів тому +12

      She's a DEI hire.

    • @clairepesarik4897
      @clairepesarik4897 20 днів тому +7

      I was going to say both of those!!😊

    • @reneem3895
      @reneem3895 20 днів тому +2

      @@texasrepojoe6755That would be Amy. She didn’t even know there were three branches of government.

    • @rikeshpr85
      @rikeshpr85 20 днів тому

      Shaddap ​@@reneem3895

    • @kandipoopipants1794
      @kandipoopipants1794 20 днів тому +1

      "The first amendment hamstrings the government" ... - Jackson

  • @stephaniekerr
    @stephaniekerr 20 днів тому +35

    She struggles knowing what a woman is. 🙄

    • @reneem3895
      @reneem3895 20 днів тому

      No woman has ever strut with knowing what a woman is.

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @Mythos1981
    @Mythos1981 20 днів тому +2

    Hearing this prosecutor say that he is against political prosecutions and NOT A SINGLE Justice gets up and says "Do you think we don't see what's happening today with Trump and the Justice Department?" is really breath-taking.......WTF?

  • @kennethw.ratcliff250
    @kennethw.ratcliff250 20 днів тому +9

    This would be a dangerous precedent.😢😢

    • @cyborgishere9551
      @cyborgishere9551 20 днів тому

      ​@TheJeffSux so, u want presidents to be above the law. Godking

    • @desireelaurelli4579
      @desireelaurelli4579 19 днів тому

      Definitely. I'm seeing a Pandora's box on political persecution. But, obviously, this would only ever be applicable against Republicans.

    • @RecoveringUGrad
      @RecoveringUGrad 19 днів тому

      @@cyborgishere9551strawman much?

    • @cyborgishere9551
      @cyborgishere9551 19 днів тому

      @@RecoveringUGrad that's what absolute immunity is

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @ronnieterry4916
    @ronnieterry4916 20 днів тому +29

    If my memory is correct this is the individual who when ask what is a woman? Could not answer that question. The question was ask during a senate confirmation hearing. I find it odd if a person can't define what a woman is how could a Supreme Court member decide legal matters? How did someone so disqualified be confirmed to the us supreme court?

    • @realtree297
      @realtree297 20 днів тому

      Black Female, only quals she needed, law qualifications weren’t necessary

    • @ktbn22
      @ktbn22 19 днів тому

      How could you expect someone who isn't a biologist to define what a woman is? I think you expect to much😉

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @MfBadass
    @MfBadass 20 днів тому +26

    DEI 💩 Trump ❤ FJB

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @kingforaday8725
    @kingforaday8725 20 днів тому +18

    Does anyone believe this is what happens when standards are lowered for certain folk? Just askin!

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @desireelaurelli4579
    @desireelaurelli4579 19 днів тому +2

    But this widens the latitude on what could fall outside of the immunity clause which would obviously have to broaden the risk of precisely political persecutions! It's taking a supposed outlier and trying to codify it. The reward they want is coming at a risk not only to the separations clause but protection of the Presidency from its own cabinet and departments.

  • @brendanokeefe5918
    @brendanokeefe5918 20 днів тому +10

    This lady doesn’t know what a woman is so I doubt she understands anything

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @milliepuryear5335
    @milliepuryear5335 17 днів тому +1

    Can we the American people not call for her impeachment

  • @brianmcalister1730
    @brianmcalister1730 20 днів тому +2

    She struggles alot. Guess thats what happens when you hold a position that you're not qualified for.

  • @milliepuryear5335
    @milliepuryear5335 17 днів тому +1

    She should have never been added to the court system

  • @leonardl8241
    @leonardl8241 20 днів тому +9

    In time of War?

  • @user-ti3fe6gg4s
    @user-ti3fe6gg4s 20 днів тому +15

    Dem witch hunt . Wow they fear DJT .

    • @c.s.440
      @c.s.440 20 днів тому

      *communist political opponent hunt

    • @seanwattles9264
      @seanwattles9264 20 днів тому

      They fear us, take out who we put in power and they expect us to cower. No.

    • @remy333
      @remy333 20 днів тому

      @@c.s.440same exact thing in 2024. If there was still a difference the Dems would have cleaned up these bad apples from their party and enlightened them on reality. Democrat = socialist if just by association or complacency alone.

    • @skyboy1956
      @skyboy1956 20 днів тому

      TDS outbreak

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @pjgraves03
    @pjgraves03 15 днів тому +1

    Americans are continuing to struggle as this Justice cannot define 'woman'..

  • @Far2hip
    @Far2hip 19 днів тому +2

    I was not in support of KBJ’s nomination, but to be an unbiased observer I have to say, she presented some highly relevant and poignant questions in this run of questions. No doubt. 👍🏻😎👍🏻

  • @markclough4710
    @markclough4710 19 днів тому +1

    I imagine most arguments are hard to understand if you are the kind of person that doesn’t even know what a woman is.

  • @robertnorris1808
    @robertnorris1808 20 днів тому +3

    I hope this women turns the tables on the likes of Biden with her BS over Trump.

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @jeffsoly1972
    @jeffsoly1972 20 днів тому +2

    God bless Donald Trump 🙏

  • @dstorm7752
    @dstorm7752 15 днів тому +1

    A person who can't define "woman" is destined to struggle with pretty much any complex intellectual scenario...

  • @BrianSmith-gp9xr
    @BrianSmith-gp9xr 20 днів тому +1

    Wow. Justice Jackson suprised me. Asking real questions. Hope it is not just a false or fake .

  • @renaldolopez6972
    @renaldolopez6972 20 днів тому +7

    Criminal case?

  • @RevaPayne
    @RevaPayne 19 днів тому +1

    since your court is the final appeal then make a much more focused decision

  • @NishiyamaArtist
    @NishiyamaArtist 20 днів тому +1

    She is precise in her inquiry at 04:19 with tantalizing questions probing the position and integrity of the arguer. Had to rewind and listen several times to comprehend the exacting legal-positioning structure of this issue presented to include all "concerned," with an importance to be experienced over Centuries and further into the distant Future of Our Country

  • @tomriggs699
    @tomriggs699 19 днів тому +1

    KBJ is not among our brightest minds.

  • @ryleighloughty3307
    @ryleighloughty3307 20 днів тому +1

    If you cannot define what a woman is, can you define what a President is?

  • @NickCager
    @NickCager 17 днів тому +1

    She's so obviously unqualified.

  • @joevi30
    @joevi30 16 днів тому +1

    Did she not know what is a woman or could not say what is a woman? DEI has failed America.

  • @leeparker4903
    @leeparker4903 20 днів тому +4

    KJB is an embarrassment to the Court.

  • @kellykiser7600
    @kellykiser7600 20 днів тому +3

    DEI hires are awesome! What in the actual ****!

    • @67Pepper
      @67Pepper 20 днів тому +2

      She and Kamala Harris speak the same lingo. A Briben appointee.

  • @jonathanahten5065
    @jonathanahten5065 19 днів тому +1

    A most impressive analysis! By Brown.

  • @user-cw2yj5jo3h
    @user-cw2yj5jo3h 20 днів тому +11

    Jumanji has NO business on this court.

    • @samcalven12
      @samcalven12 19 днів тому

      If Trump gets immunity. Then Biden should take full advantage of this immunity. Let’s see how Trumpers react they will suddenly be against immunity.

  • @tmadd1956
    @tmadd1956 17 днів тому +1

    The President has stronger powers during a National Emergency. That was the situation at the end of the Trump Presidency. This is all moot.

  • @joepepsi4127
    @joepepsi4127 17 днів тому

    im a law student and she genuinely seems to misunderstand the role of the Supreme Court.

  • @charlesharris9965
    @charlesharris9965 20 днів тому

    Please point to the Constitutional provision that places the President under the authority of Article III Courts or the DOJ. I'll wait.

  • @lirmchip
    @lirmchip 20 днів тому +1

    Is she talking to men or women and how would she know the difference?

  • @x3dominator28
    @x3dominator28 13 днів тому

    Why does the justice dept attorney keep going back to the constitution when his boss wipes his ass with it daily?

  • @Anne_Onymous
    @Anne_Onymous 19 днів тому

    We're all struggling

  • @cperera910
    @cperera910 20 днів тому +1

    Give her time she will eventually come with the first question " What is a Women"

  • @joshwoodford9332
    @joshwoodford9332 17 днів тому +1

    What a joke of a scotus justice .. this woman is horrible..

  • @franny4846
    @franny4846 20 днів тому +3

    Aledged act; hummmm

  • @hotchihuahua1546
    @hotchihuahua1546 20 днів тому

    Character went out the door with this Supreme Court judge before she became one !
    “ This president “ is the key to her statement ! Not all presidents in an argument !
    She is bias and that is unacceptable!!!!!!

  • @peace-yv4qd
    @peace-yv4qd 20 днів тому

    I don't get the impression that Justice Jackson knows what she's talking about. She sounds like a college student in a debate. She is struggling to understand because she's a DEI appointed Judge.

  •  17 днів тому

    How did this WOMAN get on the Supreme Court? Just my opinion. Exercising my 1st ammendment rights.

  • @MrCarrillo26
    @MrCarrillo26 16 днів тому

    A woman that does know what they are! Wow

  • @rolandgothburgh7708
    @rolandgothburgh7708 13 днів тому

    She struggled to define a woman. Can she be certain about anything?

  • @meegangamble6503
    @meegangamble6503 20 днів тому +1

    Time x time =stallllllllling fs bla fckity bla, your tax dollars at work

  • @thetruth3164
    @thetruth3164 20 днів тому +1

    Great question!

  • @user-mw5ut5do3h
    @user-mw5ut5do3h 20 днів тому +1

    Trump are president for 2024👍

  • @user-df9rw6mz2x
    @user-df9rw6mz2x 19 днів тому

    yep and you should make it retroactive ,

  • @josephfdunphymba3241
    @josephfdunphymba3241 17 днів тому

    A biologist would probably understand the question AND use the correct bathroom

  • @almonaster4328
    @almonaster4328 20 днів тому +1

    What ever happened to Justice Scalia? 😒

    • @chriszasada9756
      @chriszasada9756 20 днів тому +3

      He got whacked ,

    • @almonaster4328
      @almonaster4328 20 днів тому

      @@chriszasada9756 I wanted a crazy lib to say it but thanks fellow Patriot 💯❤🇺🇲

    • @JudgeCraven
      @JudgeCraven 20 днів тому +2

      He was smothered with a pillow

    • @almonaster4328
      @almonaster4328 20 днів тому

      @@JudgeCraven How old was the boy?
      I meant the culprit 🤔

    • @JudgeCraven
      @JudgeCraven 20 днів тому +1

      @@almonaster4328 are you implying he was murdered by an underage homosexual lover?

  • @milliepuryear5335
    @milliepuryear5335 17 днів тому

    Is this not the judge that cannot say what a woman is?

  • @BlackRiverGold
    @BlackRiverGold 20 днів тому

    This judge is good because she will never reach any specific point. She knows how to shift around.

  • @riverspirit7
    @riverspirit7 17 днів тому

    Sadly, she struggles with every argument..like first year law students did in the 1980s before dei..

  • @betsydonato6817
    @betsydonato6817 20 днів тому +1

    In retrospect of a pronoun 'Jackson " as a flux core welder, i think someone needs to put a beed on the nomenclature of the robe, and put a staple through the form. I mean since the carbon copy is the same as blue on black written on Jim Carrys face in the movie ' Liar Liar ' subliminal to the object // subject vessel, vehicle, and or persons. A stick shift for M or F in the square, and a double slash for L, G, B, T Static Automatic circle shape forms would address the Generic Form with an accountability to the Organ Donor emission AA Big Book Free Library Dewey Decimal Card Catalog Town Clerk and School Nurses UIA Dewey Decimal Card Catalog DOE // DOE between the Wood Shop and the Metal Shop with such brand name welders as say,,," Lincoln '..if only DMV could establish these transmission sponsors.

  • @cherylbeach318
    @cherylbeach318 18 днів тому +1

    Trump 2024!🎉🙏🏼

  • @charlessheldon5328
    @charlessheldon5328 20 днів тому +1

    Would any act that a president performs be considered an official act except when he is actually campaigning but when campaigning he would have a lesser immunity since he never truly leaves the job?

    • @wasatchm
      @wasatchm 17 днів тому

      I think so. to me, it seems impossible to separate personal acts from official acts. it may even be impossible to separate campaigning as a personal act. the white house staff is really the campaign arm of the current president. they may have some limitations on what they can say. but everything they say and do is to make him look good and hpefully get re-election. and when a president travels for campaigning. he is required to travel with the white house staff. so their on air force one with him everywhere he goes. so, to me there are LITTLE TO NO PERSONAL ACTS while a president is in office.

  • @missy567ful
    @missy567ful 15 днів тому

    Kentaji we cannot prosecute a then-sitting President now without all other ex-presidents being implicated and every future President shouldn't be implicated based on our last ex-president's behavior in official capacity.

  • @charleshodge1157
    @charleshodge1157 20 днів тому +2

    She was struggling when the question was asked what is a woman before being selected as one of the Supreme Court judges.

  • @lindadouglass4692
    @lindadouglass4692 15 днів тому

    I have a problem with this DEI Judge who couldn't or wouldn't define a woman. A life position
    and stupid all in one.

  • @scottpeters346
    @scottpeters346 16 днів тому

    She struggles everyday with which sleeve to put on first.

  • @paulsheppard1108
    @paulsheppard1108 17 днів тому

    It appears that they are talking in circles about a whole lot of nothing.

  • @robertmanley2687
    @robertmanley2687 20 днів тому

    Even she doesn't want to look stupid in this case it's a joke

  • @PiperLink
    @PiperLink 20 днів тому +2

    Gezzz 🥱

  • @KettlesAdvocate
    @KettlesAdvocate 20 днів тому

    As far as financial fraud, is financial enrichment deriving from private, yet undisclosed or classified information you'd never have access to without government involvement considered fraud?
    Can you rationalize a congressperson or president enriching themselves thus when a civilian can't without fear of prosecution?
    For instance when Biden spoke about yielding dividends spanning generations, could he have shared how and where this would be achieved and which companies the American public could invest in alongside the cognisenti?

  • @carlrockaway1696
    @carlrockaway1696 15 днів тому +1

    Fitzgerald V nixon

  • @BarbTodd
    @BarbTodd 20 днів тому

    I don’t know … she is difficult to follow. And whoever this prosecutor is … is confusing.

  • @jameswild8373
    @jameswild8373 20 днів тому

    What question what is a woman ❤️🇺🇸✌️

  • @catherinemcenhill2921
    @catherinemcenhill2921 13 днів тому

    Has she not been watching the telly

  • @Arealist763
    @Arealist763 16 днів тому

    Unlike the others she mostly makes statements rather than probe. Statements confirming her views and then asking for comments. Her point about maybe just saying yes or no to absolutely immunity is circular as that analysis would have to be done by a lower court but supreme court will ultimately have to decide that on any appeal or at some point in the future. Deciding that now would guide lower courts and avoid pointless prosecutions.

  • @marialogan8786
    @marialogan8786 20 днів тому +3

    Strange...since she can't explain what a woman is!!! 🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️🤦🏻‍♀️

  • @afterthefox
    @afterthefox 20 днів тому +1

    she talks way too much...

  • @Daniel-nr2uf
    @Daniel-nr2uf 19 днів тому

    Well she doesn’t know what a woman is.

  • @sandychenault7006
    @sandychenault7006 14 днів тому

    She has trouble understanding " woman," also

  • @brucevandermeulen4170
    @brucevandermeulen4170 17 днів тому

    I'm wondering if that wouldn't be OK for a while?

  • @ooochakalaka
    @ooochakalaka 16 днів тому

    Does she need a biologist when she has to answer a question on a application that asks to check off if she is male or female?

  • @lmae989
    @lmae989 18 днів тому

    I just can’t listen to her discussion. But I am not worried. BTW is she a “woman” when she doesn’t even know what it is. As a future justice how embarrassing.

  • @RickRoberts_simplyrick
    @RickRoberts_simplyrick 20 днів тому

    Yes, we have no bananas....

  • @snagletoothscott3729
    @snagletoothscott3729 20 днів тому

    She struggles with a lot of thing. 90% of her "questions" were just parroting what Deeben said, then asking things work. She doesn't understand basic stuff.

  • @caseyphillips3567
    @caseyphillips3567 15 днів тому

    I'm struggling with this lady it doesn't apply to the president... my God

  • @HeartofInspiration
    @HeartofInspiration 18 днів тому

    I agree with the not defining a woman statements, but did you all listen to her questions? If you did, you would find that she is leaning towards Trump's position on this. I'm sure she is thinking about the future, and it will not end well for Biden with all the actual evidence that is available. Obama as well.

  • @2real2fall
    @2real2fall 20 днів тому +9

    The more I read the comments the more I wonder if chronic deafness has spread through the nation. Not a single person here is talking about what was actually said in the audio. I also wonder if anyone here can spell all that well. 😂

    • @MordechaiK89
      @MordechaiK89 20 днів тому +2

      mostly bots on here

    • @allonelife699
      @allonelife699 20 днів тому +1

      I totally agree. I don't think anyone actually watched the video. They keep saying she doesnt know what a woman is which has nothing to do with the video. They must be a bunch of bots. They dont have time to watch or listen to the audio

    • @annsantonino9103
      @annsantonino9103 20 днів тому +2

      You said it right!

    • @bigmunnywalt
      @bigmunnywalt 20 днів тому +1

      👀🆘 glad somebody said something

    • @lebohangmohapi8605
      @lebohangmohapi8605 20 днів тому +2

      You're also not talking about what was said in the audio.

  • @beefcattle1543
    @beefcattle1543 19 днів тому

    Thats obviously not a woman.

  • @cheez1213
    @cheez1213 19 днів тому

    DEI usually struggle, yes.