How SC's

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 781

  • @ThePrintIndia
    @ThePrintIndia  4 роки тому

    Good journalism needs support from smart people like you. Subscribe to ThePrint here: theprint.in/subscribe/

  • @MohsinAli-qv5eo
    @MohsinAli-qv5eo 5 років тому +30

    Best analysis. There seems to be a lot of wisdom in the judgement. Surprisingly no other channel has put it in such a clear manner. Hope people who are whipping passions would understand the intent of the judgement

  • @souravbanerjee8091
    @souravbanerjee8091 5 років тому +345

    Only unhappy people
    UPSC aspirants and Law students
    😒1045 pages
    Syllabus barate raho bas 😭

    • @WOEEW
      @WOEEW 5 років тому +3

      haahhahahahah

    • @veer_Gurjar4
      @veer_Gurjar4 5 років тому +26

      Don't worry questions wouldn't come from that area as it itself quite controversial issue to be part of exam.

    • @veer_Gurjar4
      @veer_Gurjar4 5 років тому +3

      Between I m judiciary aspirant

    • @debdeepghosh9493
      @debdeepghosh9493 5 років тому +3

      @@veer_Gurjar4 not between its by the way..lololol

    • @adityasatpute4337
      @adityasatpute4337 5 років тому +2

      Its our destiny 😂

  • @akhaleefa
    @akhaleefa 5 років тому +6

    A 1000 page plus judgement is explained so clearly in a few minutes. Hats off to Mr. Shekar.

  • @shajimathews2270
    @shajimathews2270 5 років тому +6

    Thank you Shekhar Sir for your de-cluttering. Each time you being to light items in amazing way.
    India needs more journalists of Shekhar Sir's calibre.

  • @saketmundhada2197
    @saketmundhada2197 5 років тому +177

    Court:“History and its wrongs shall not be used as instruments to oppress the present and the future”
    Knock knock
    Aarakshan!!!

    • @theAraAra
      @theAraAra 5 років тому +20

      If you had no way of knowing, would you rather be born as a Brahmin or a Dalit?
      You now have the answer for who's oppressing who.

    • @NidzShah-ps6kr
      @NidzShah-ps6kr 5 років тому +7

      @@theAraAra very poignant and well put :)

    • @abhi-_-
      @abhi-_- 5 років тому +5

      And reservation is not being used to oppress but to provide level playing field... General category people cant see that the SC/ST people dont have adequate standard of living to pursue what they want... General cat is not being brought down but the backward community is being pushed up...

    • @arjunkharbanda
      @arjunkharbanda 5 років тому +1

      www.firstpost.com/india/video-of-dalit-mans-body-being-lowered-from-bridge-for-cremation-goes-viral-after-upper-caste-hindus-deny-access-through-land-7206721.html
      Is this also history?

    • @Machaivelli
      @Machaivelli 5 років тому +5

      Here's the thing folks I am a GENERAL from middle class background , have seen friends well off than me keeping half of the marks & still getting into prestigious colleges
      but I will say this RESERVATION is REQUIRED ! Casteism is still prevelant (but thankfully not rampant as it was decades ago)
      But at the same time creamy layer should be introduced in it ! Reservations in promotions should be stopped
      Else the children of the beurocrats grade a b govt officers will take away the jobs of the real backward people who deserve the reservation benefits

  • @mohanramakrishnan3287
    @mohanramakrishnan3287 5 років тому +38

    Had this verdict been delivered during INC's rule, the Congress would have overturned this through parliament just like Sha Bano case....

    • @TheJainmehul
      @TheJainmehul 5 років тому +1

      Lmao nonsense. Chup kar bhakt.

    • @onetwo-jm2gj
      @onetwo-jm2gj 5 років тому

      Case is solved..abhi toh bahar aao iskey

    • @Haxerous
      @Haxerous 5 років тому

      @@onetwo-jm2gj they won't. Now they'll say Mandir is too small and want to make it bigger than Burj Khalifa 😂😂😂

    • @rampuratictok1809
      @rampuratictok1809 5 років тому +2

      I agree congress is anti hindu to core and thinks after English they were rulers shame

    • @VikasJaink
      @VikasJaink 5 років тому +2

      @@TheJainmehul I believe you have no idea of Shah banu case. Congress went to lowest level for appeasement.

  • @MrAditya1singh
    @MrAditya1singh 5 років тому +1

    One of the most balanced analysis on the Verdict so far..!! You simplify these complicated issues with amazing ease, 'Cut the Clutter' is thus an apt name for your episodes..

  • @yella3665
    @yella3665 5 років тому +3

    Don’t forget to see from 12:38 to end...it gives ..what the mindset people shud have on all past wrongs and go ahead for the better secular and friendly world...thanks Shekar Jim for explaining this.

  • @sagars9621
    @sagars9621 5 років тому +25

    Hey Shekhar I don't watch these TV debates and just look for that one show of urs everyday, amazing oratory skills!!

  • @venkitarayanramakrishnan5615
    @venkitarayanramakrishnan5615 5 років тому +2

    Nicely summarised the verdict. Let us hope that we will move forward in communal harmony. As said by SG “Kal ki bath chodo “and let us pave the way for a brighter India”

  • @sudhiharibhat
    @sudhiharibhat 5 років тому +6

    #CutTheClutter is just fantastic. Every single episode.
    For wider viewership, a Hindi version would help a lot. I saw some truly ordinary news videos getting almost the same footfall as yours.

  • @krishnakumarramani6527
    @krishnakumarramani6527 5 років тому

    Listening to you continuously for last 4 months. Your analysis were simple and easy understand. You discussed the fact and hardly see you siding with political parties. Must watch Cut the clutter

  • @ThereYouGoFromHere
    @ThereYouGoFromHere 5 років тому

    At 12.38 thank you sir for addressing the fear that I had, it is good that you mentioned the court's carefulness in handling the case. I hope this part of the judgement is respected, because this has the power to affect our future the most.

  • @EXOTICAA
    @EXOTICAA 5 років тому +95

    We are here to see you. But apke jo colleagues hai they are the face of leftist mindset not liberals

    • @anishdubey6721
      @anishdubey6721 5 років тому +2

      A-Woke you’re wrong here or maybe it’s your prerogative can’t help

    • @ganeshdore
      @ganeshdore 5 років тому +2

      Shekhar was leftist also. He changed horses .

    • @KavateJayesh
      @KavateJayesh 5 років тому

      @@a-woke5283 the issue with people like u is that u only see this much like a football game between left and right😑 unable to look from the neutral perspective. Your argument can be used to justify even when he was supposed supporting only liberal or left media

    • @KavateJayesh
      @KavateJayesh 5 років тому +1

      @@a-woke5283 sometimes try to see from a neutral perspective. No wonder it doesn't make sense to u.

    • @miller0079
      @miller0079 5 років тому +2

      @@KavateJayesh lol bruh he's a leftist and guess what leftist started the left and right in India .
      They started calling BJP hindu extremist and rightist lol while it's actually a very neutral party .
      India doesn't have a proper right .
      Yes some are right leaning but no one is proper right not even RSS lmao .
      Coz all the policies that BJP has brought till now are same one brought by liberals of west .
      So you see there's a lot more diff than politics here and the west .
      Western politics is white and black although it's changing now and I never understood why people compare the politics here to the west lol .

  • @nirajsrivastava7922
    @nirajsrivastava7922 5 років тому +8

    I used to follow him on tv talk show for last 20 yrs.First time I liked his analysis.

    • @DarknetDecoded
      @DarknetDecoded 5 років тому

      So for 20 yrs you followed someone whos views you didn't like.

  • @hemantkhanna36
    @hemantkhanna36 5 років тому +12

    I have to admit I don't like Sekhar Gupta - haven't liked him for a long time. Having said that, begrudgingly, I have to give him kudos and express appreciation for presenting the Ayodhya verdict in a simple and easy to understand manner. It is concise and without embellishments. There is no emotion rabble rousing or innuendo. Thanks! Great job.

    • @user-zm4ie7tz8n
      @user-zm4ie7tz8n 5 років тому

      And that's why u need librerals or else it media mayhem all day

  • @rakeshpanicker7185
    @rakeshpanicker7185 5 років тому +38

    Have been eagerly waiting for Shekhar Ji's take on it!!! One of the best places to consume news these days...

  • @sanothradeepak
    @sanothradeepak 5 років тому +3

    Sir a big fan of your cut the clutter program and watch all your episodes. But sometimes I am jealous because in some instances I do not completely support your deduction of facts but still love to listen to how articulate and structured you are (specially point wise agruments and even rating them in order).
    Big fan of yours and would someday love to meet you in person.

  • @joshim123
    @joshim123 5 років тому +1

    Shekhar, The latest Economist has quoted you on Ayodhya👏👏👏

  • @hardikpopli
    @hardikpopli 5 років тому +50

    The judiciary made a big mistake by putting off this judgement for so many years. They really proved that indecision always makes a mess of things.

    • @appmaster7808
      @appmaster7808 5 років тому

      Thats just the indian way of doing things

    • @appmaster7808
      @appmaster7808 5 років тому

      @joebob i think he rolled a joint with the pages of your history text book
      Hes right
      U prolly need to understant and learn more of indian history

    • @appmaster7808
      @appmaster7808 5 років тому

      @subhadeep mandal yep agree with u sir
      But please dont try to negate the fact that a lot of things in india reach the limit before we can do something about it
      Thats what i was trying to say
      Resr of what u said makes sense

    • @appmaster7808
      @appmaster7808 5 років тому

      @joebob 200 yesrs of british rule and draining 45 trillion frrom the indian economy
      Im not sure which part of that u dont seem to understand?

    • @Zapstrom
      @Zapstrom 5 років тому

      This wasn't an issue that can be solved overnight,people's emotions are involved,and time is needed for everyone to understand and accept each other.

  • @penntemp
    @penntemp 5 років тому +8

    Kashi, Mathura, are still remaining. No power on earth can stop the reconstruction of the temples there.

    • @priyankavv1266
      @priyankavv1266 5 років тому +1

      Temples are already there. Haven't you ever been there?

    • @kamakshijolly4156
      @kamakshijolly4156 5 років тому +2

      @@priyankavv1266 masjid made on top of actual Krishna janma Bhumi .Only a part of it is the temple. Gyanvapi mosque lies on actual place of benares and the temple lies to the side of it!

    • @kamakshijolly4156
      @kamakshijolly4156 5 років тому +1

      Not only these but qutub minar complex as well!

  • @arunkannan2796
    @arunkannan2796 5 років тому +18

    Thanks Shekhar ji. I am finding good quality journalism here again and again.

  • @emanuveldavis
    @emanuveldavis 5 років тому +1

    Mr.Gupta I love this show the combination of News +knowledge with a neutral view rather than sensational banter...

  • @versatiletheone2835
    @versatiletheone2835 5 років тому +37

    This country, my country BHARAT, is now getting mature and wise.. Time to Move On...

    • @abdulmanaan2792
      @abdulmanaan2792 5 років тому

      yeah u asshole.....because your mythological ram's Mandir will be built

    • @versatiletheone2835
      @versatiletheone2835 5 років тому +2

      @@abdulmanaan2792 yeah...it maybe myth...same as those flat earth, flying donkey, pedophile Mohammed and self centric egoistic Allah.
      But it's close to my heart... And you won't understand cause your forefathers destroyed that temple to built Babur's(an invader) Masjid. Why is this that most of the masjids are built on destroyed holy shrines of other religions?? whether be it Babri or Al-aqsa!!

    • @versatiletheone2835
      @versatiletheone2835 5 років тому

      @magesticmaniacc yeah rightly said..Injustice never prevails.. the injustice done on Hindus has come to an end. Who will believe it that a country where Hindus were in majority had to go through 500 years long struggle for a place that legally, historically and rightfully theirs and finally get justice through a supreme court of justice via a legal and peaceful way. But the world must know!!! That India, i.e. Bharat had kept its secularism alive...
      And people who never read the sc judgement(where the matter was a land dispute and judgement was on land dispute) are putting doubt on the court.
      The people who keep shouting Gujarat riot...must first read the whole history. It was not Hindus but the muslims who burned the Godhra train bogeys with people inside that provoked the Gujarat riots. those burning people' shrilling screams and cry's are still alive roaming free...
      Mera Bharat Mahan

  • @sanothradeepak
    @sanothradeepak 5 років тому +12

    At 15:46, Shekhar sir fumbles and says “Lord speaks to our history” and then corrects “law speaks to our history”. Completely reverses the meaning and sounds so funny. 😂😂😂

  • @ujwalmokashi6702
    @ujwalmokashi6702 5 років тому +13

    South Indians are so happy on this verdict. Ram is so much more revered in south. So many songs in Carnatic music is dedicated to Ram. Ram Navami is one of the biggest festival in south. So many villages are named after Rama.
    South Indians are emotional people. Ram is super-emotion.

    • @sahayapurv
      @sahayapurv 5 років тому +4

      Ram is revered across India.

    • @thewandering_pixel
      @thewandering_pixel 5 років тому +1

      Ram Navami is one of the biggest festivals in South?! Seriously? Pls be precise on the area. I'm a south Indian and we don't really worship Ram like they do in the North, neither are there that many Ram temples around. It's Vishnu who is revered not the avtar. Hopefully now the politicians will focus on Vikas rather than ask votes in the name of Mandir.

    • @ujwalmokashi6702
      @ujwalmokashi6702 5 років тому +3

      @@thewandering_pixel Where are you from in south India? There are hundreds of ram temple in south.
      Let me list down some important Rama Temples in South.
      1. Badrachalam Sri Ramachandra Swamy Temple in Telangana
      2. Eri Kaatha Ramar Temple in Chennai, Tamil Nadu
      3. Vaduvur Sri Rama near Mannargudi, Tamil Nadu
      4. Darbha Sayana Ramar & Pattabhishega Ramar in Thirupullani.
      5. Anantha Sayana Ramar near Panruti, Tamil Nadu.
      6. Sri Valvil Ramar, Thirupullaboothangudi, Tamil Nadu.
      6. Sri Yoga Ramar Nedundundram.
      7. Sri Vijayaraghava Perumal, Thiruputkuzhi, Tamil Nadu
      8. Sri Vaidhiya Veeraraghava Perumal Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu
      9. Kollavilli Ramar, TN
      I can go on. But it's not necessary. I have made my point.

    • @ujwalmokashi6702
      @ujwalmokashi6702 5 років тому

      Madwa traditions in Karnataka's main diety is Rama. They call it moola Rama.

    • @thewandering_pixel
      @thewandering_pixel 5 років тому

      @@ujwalmokashi6702 then say Ram navami is celebrated by a specific Brahmin subcast. do all South Indians do? Maybe not. I'm a kannadiga who has also lived in the North, and no we don't worship Rama separately. That's why I said Vishnu takes precedence over the Ram avtar. This is difference is mainly because of The spread and popularity of Vaishnavism and Shavism in the south. And You seem to have deliberately misunderstood my comment - nowhere have I mentioned that there are "no" Ram temples here. Also this begs the question if there are so many Ram temples around, why does one need another temple? You are obviously more attached to the issue so I'll leave it at that. Peace.

  • @manidwivedi5880
    @manidwivedi5880 5 років тому +22

    Nation has confronted history and moved on but when Will Muslim Accept the fact that Muslim rulers were Oppressive to non Muslim?
    Being a Banarasi I am not Saying to take down Gyanvapi Masjid but I wanted Muslim to accept the fact that Aurangzeb Attacked Kashi Vishwanath Temple.

    • @xarup
      @xarup 5 років тому +2

      Do not talk nonsense. Do you want more riots? Just move on.

    • @irfantasticxyz
      @irfantasticxyz 5 років тому

      Non-retrogression is an essential feature of Secularism

  • @wgpcc
    @wgpcc 5 років тому +6

    Good analysis and positive review, thank you. Time to put this behind and focus on development issues.
    PM Modi has shown great statesmanship and trying to bring all communities together. So far ( first 12 hours ) all looking good and hope it continues. Given that people have criticised his reluctance to comment off the hook and immediately on other issues, they should recognise it when it is done.
    There were many people pushing Modi govt to bring an executive order to meet electoral compulsion. Thank god he did not go down that way and waited patiently for proper procedure to be completed. Well done 👍👍👍

  • @kiwiwala
    @kiwiwala 5 років тому

    A very good analysis....presentation was easy to understand. The SC decision has to be explained by the government to the people of India, in their vernacular languages, in a non emotional and objective way so that the healing and closure can take place. This approach has a lot of positives for moving forward as a nation.

  • @romeomustdie2555
    @romeomustdie2555 5 років тому +2

    Hats of to you sir, you're an inspirational to many....keep up the good work 👍👍wish I had known you long time back😌😌you're very precise and to the point in every topic👌

  • @kailashchanddujari7535
    @kailashchanddujari7535 5 років тому +2

    After listening hole day so many people and anchor on TV news I think this is the best explanation of the judgement in shortest possible time a genius
    Thanks

  • @nihalt.j5624
    @nihalt.j5624 5 років тому +8

    What India needs is truth and reconciliation. Without that non retrogression won't work.

  • @MrRiteshravi
    @MrRiteshravi 5 років тому +1

    Great analysis of judgement.. Thank you..

  • @babuvishy
    @babuvishy 5 років тому +30

    "if history and its wrongs cannot be used to oppress the present and future" - How about the concept of reservations?

    • @terracegardenkittens
      @terracegardenkittens 5 років тому +2

      Obc and sc/st are still oppressed in various ways in today's India. You will not find these things in big cities but it is still highly prevalent in rural areas.

    • @000Aful
      @000Aful 5 років тому +6

      @@terracegardenkittens then those reservations should be limited to such rural areas only.

    • @gmgayu6746
      @gmgayu6746 4 роки тому

      @/S_/H_/U_/K_/R_/A_/Y_/E / apologies, but there is uniform civil code in place. So reservations are gonna be limited n restricted

  • @neehup2372
    @neehup2372 5 років тому +1

    Well said and explained. It's true we need to move on

  • @niranjanbhatlu6728
    @niranjanbhatlu6728 5 років тому +11

    Reason why I still didn't unsubscribe print despite of the biased journalism.. Shekhar sir.. ur cut the clutter will remain as a classic.

  • @venkatthammanaboina9821
    @venkatthammanaboina9821 5 років тому +1

    Sir it was very clear and can be easily understood by anyone
    Thanks a lot sir

  • @samarth3353
    @samarth3353 5 років тому +25

    Confront our history ?
    *Marxist Historians have left the chat *

  • @shekhuverma8533
    @shekhuverma8533 5 років тому +26

    No more mandir majsid politics now lets move on and make India strong together.

    • @yaswantjaiswal7111
      @yaswantjaiswal7111 5 років тому +1

      @Bhushan Kumar Taj Mahal also remaining

    • @indiantiger6675
      @indiantiger6675 5 років тому +3

      @@bazlur-Vancouver no one has talked bout islam, he has talked bout a palace built by a cruel ruler. Dont dare you talk bout other religion.

    • @neildutta
      @neildutta 5 років тому +1

      @@bazlur-Vancouver do you realize thay BJP was voted into power with super majority because of people like you! You reveal your true mindset with your words! So keep it going!

    • @mirandapillsbury7885
      @mirandapillsbury7885 4 роки тому

      lmao as if.

    • @mirandapillsbury7885
      @mirandapillsbury7885 4 роки тому

      @@yaswantjaiswal7111 No Taj Mahal is not a Hindu building as much as some would like to claim it. Even its architecture is clearly not. Even the inside which has been sealed off has still be proven to be newly built by the Mughals. It is not Hindu. Leave it alone

  • @elennet4116
    @elennet4116 5 років тому +2

    Sir atleast in india we have given 5 acres of land for muslims and atleast appeased them
    But Ramnakali Temple was destroyed in Dhaka and was not even restored or land given back to Hindus
    Muslims have always destroyed thousands of Temples for thousands for years
    But I don't understand why journalists and activists question the muslims about their acts of violence....still continuing to this day

  • @ricoshae6487
    @ricoshae6487 5 років тому +14

    Its not a victory for any party. This is an opportunity to make peace and to let it prevail. If I ever visit Ayodhya Ram mandir i shall also go and see the mosque.

  • @chintanshah9614
    @chintanshah9614 5 років тому +14

    The endings like this is why I love watching this episode.. 👌👌

  • @sundareshkrishna6457
    @sundareshkrishna6457 5 років тому +3

    Sir as ever.... clear cogent and beautifully expressed.... thank u..... I for one am optimistic about our people.

  • @mvvnmurty6720
    @mvvnmurty6720 5 років тому +29

    1045 pages !!! not words

  • @RiaanRoars
    @RiaanRoars 5 років тому +3

    I wish all media in this country was as responsible as you sir.
    Question - when in 1991 law was passed with Ayodhya as the exception had the Indian govt at that time made us the mind that temple will be constructed there in the future?

  • @ajitkumarsingh9076
    @ajitkumarsingh9076 5 років тому +8

    Most Balanced....Well articulated verdict..No teams win or both teams win....India has won!!!

  • @srichakrahubli
    @srichakrahubli 5 років тому +41

    U have been my favourite since my school days.... Late eighties... Keep up the good work!!!

    • @srichakrahubli
      @srichakrahubli 5 років тому

      @@ramachandria ?????

    • @pmvura01
      @pmvura01 5 років тому

      After all, there is only one Wheeler Dealer. LOL.

  • @AcharyaBhatt
    @AcharyaBhatt 5 років тому +12

    Professor saab, today's law class was wonderful.

  • @jaygadhvi2174
    @jaygadhvi2174 5 років тому

    all these years of fighting and finally there's peace. People must understand that everything is sorted out with time, so there is no need to fight for such things cause one action leads to another and would keep on going for long.

  • @ganeshdore
    @ganeshdore 5 років тому

    Shekhar Sahib....
    The Logic by Justice Gogoi ...cuts the clutter very well indeed... .. and comes down hard on all parties involved...
    1. Archeological findings are ruled inconclusive in this property dispute
    ( Hindu Faction Lawyers get a huge black eye , India Archeological Investigators also get a huge black eye ,
    So do Muslim faction Lawyers as there was evidence of Non Muslim architecture below the Mosque floor
    but findings did not address ( stayed silent ) if this Architecture was a temple or if there was evidence of temple destruction... )
    2. Faith does not count on a property dispute ( Hindu Faction Lawyers get a black eye )
    3. Inner and outer courtyard distinction is rejected as " subdivision does not determine a title" ( Muslim lawyers get a black eye )
    4. Allahabad High court ( 2010 ruling ) is ruled totally off base ( Huge Huge Black eye for Allahabad Court Justices )
    // Supreme court said " Allahabad high court had no business delving into partition of disputed land ,, Its ruling defied Logic, and defied settled principles of Law on property Title disputes ".
    This is as bad as it gets !!!!!!!!!
    5. So the final judgement was decided on
    " Muslim faction lawyers could not clearly prove / establish sole possession
    of this site 1558 to 1827 and beyond " Thus Muslim faction lawyers get a Black eye.
    Hindu faction lawyers had demonstrated that Hindus had
    prayed all over the 2,77 acres
    including inside the dome as long as anyone can remember.
    Score a big one for Hindu faction lawyers.
    So court decided you need a judgement that is " workable ".
    since 150 years of litigation was going nowhere.
    Remember... The 2.77 acres in question is totally surrounded
    by 65 acres under Central Govt ownership. ( That would be Amit Shah !! )
    +++++++++++++++++++==
    Subject: Hindustan Times on Ayodhya
    Five key reasons behind Supreme Court ruling in Ayodhya verdict
    www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/five-key-reasons-behind-sc-ruling/story-yyxVgi7UOgX3hOU9pPRIbL.html

  • @joyantoghosh4677
    @joyantoghosh4677 5 років тому +28

    Sir, you must start your own 24 hr news channel.. it will be miles ahead than all other channels in content and accuracy..hats off to you..again

    • @MJ-pb4bp
      @MJ-pb4bp 5 років тому +3

      No, trp race destroys the flavour of news..

    • @hpremjit
      @hpremjit 5 років тому +1

      I would almost second this request, but i fear market forces and TRP will cast its dirty spell then.

    • @curdrice9739
      @curdrice9739 5 років тому

      Pakka commie limes coupta

    • @joyantoghosh4677
      @joyantoghosh4677 5 років тому +1

      @@hpremjit humm.. may b u r right.. consumerism often destroys the purest forms of news..

  • @tjena5772
    @tjena5772 5 років тому

    Great analysis Sekhar. While the media goes harping on legalities with hair splitting lawyers dwelling on legalistic paragraphs you’ve gone about it as your usual self of a perceptive journalist, almost a social scientist. The paragraph quoted on historical oppression is the most illuminating part of the judgement indeed. How I wish to have a Nelson Mandela type Reconciliation Movement to mitigate all sense of injuries of the past.

  • @arnabnandi2423
    @arnabnandi2423 5 років тому +1

    Thank you for decluttering one of the most obfuscating judgment of the century. :-D

  • @milenamarques-zachariah4877
    @milenamarques-zachariah4877 5 років тому +1

    Loved the way you broke it down! Truly decluttered the issue for me! Thank you, sir!

  • @nishibala5824
    @nishibala5824 5 років тому +2

    13:26 well said

  • @chaitanyask8300
    @chaitanyask8300 5 років тому +6

    i have become addicted ur daily decluttering. Is it possible to have 'Late night shows' organized like John Oliver?

  • @ashifmohamed7020
    @ashifmohamed7020 5 років тому +11

    You are the 💎 among the few honest journalists

    • @atifkhan7423
      @atifkhan7423 5 років тому +1

      Ashif Mohamed r u happy brother or scared to oppose this decision tel me honestly was this not expected

    • @superdudeee2345
      @superdudeee2345 5 років тому

      @@atifkhan7423 Atif Bhai, this temple is like Mecca for us..we can give 100 acres to you if you want to build Masjid and many Hindus decided to build a grand Masjid at some other place..I wish you respect our faith..and no Hindu hates you.. there are 40 lakh mosques in India..but we want this small piece of land..we love Indian Muslims and every Hindu should thank Muslims for this..peace above all..jai hind

  • @swastik1nm
    @swastik1nm 5 років тому +56

    Waiting for this from afternoon

  • @akshaysinha1993
    @akshaysinha1993 5 років тому +1

    That was one hell of a dissection. Excellent video.

  • @MoodyGuitar
    @MoodyGuitar 5 років тому +1

    It took 491 years and 50+ generations to legally pray at one of the holiest site of the faith of a billion+ in their own and only country. The site that was violently annexed and was tried to be converted.
    Now flip this story around and imagine if this had happened to another faith. How much tolerance would we have been talking about.

  • @ArunPotdarLeo
    @ArunPotdarLeo 5 років тому +2

    Excellent analysis and very informative. I was looking for the basis of this historical judgement and the application of constitutional provisions. I got what I was looking for. Thanks Shekhar.

  • @MADMAX7330
    @MADMAX7330 5 років тому +1

    Always set playback speed to 1.25X

  • @studyneetjeeupscsccgatecam1903
    @studyneetjeeupscsccgatecam1903 5 років тому +47

    Guptaji thanks for reading actual judgement. News don't do that

    • @curdrice9739
      @curdrice9739 5 років тому

      Hahaha, you fall for coupta, go to court website and read it. This coupta is in bangle breaking ceremony

  • @prashantaggarwal640
    @prashantaggarwal640 5 років тому

    Sir tv news dekhna shod diya..jab se apne..cut the clutter start kiya hai..bas apke new episode ane ka intezar kartey hai..refresh updated..ho jatey hai..u can call ur show REFRESH

  • @akshytube
    @akshytube 5 років тому +8

    Then why reservations when discrimination was done pre independence?

  • @pauljoseph870
    @pauljoseph870 5 років тому

    Shekharji has done a fairly good job.
    As you were doing earlier if you can limit the length of the video within 15 minutes, of course the ideal is 10 minutes, it will be appreciated.
    Congrats!

  • @achrajbhandari5454
    @achrajbhandari5454 5 років тому

    Mr. Gupta, can you please also add the Episode number in the description text also so that it becomes easy to recognize the update

  • @noorsyyed
    @noorsyyed 5 років тому +2

    thanks 🙏 unfolding it succinctly
    that’s why i watch your channel

  • @sumitkulkarni23
    @sumitkulkarni23 5 років тому +2

    Thanks for the clutter free description sir ...
    One correction - at 18.26 you mentioned independence on 15th August 1957 ... Not 1947. With so many referances to years it can happen but thought of pointing out so that it can be corrected if possible.

  • @cienu33
    @cienu33 5 років тому +3

    Well Analysed again by Shekar.

  • @sachaadmi6203
    @sachaadmi6203 5 років тому +26

    Question from nidhi razdan in ndtv today:are we sure the court has directed the trust to build a temple.can the trust build a mosque?

    • @ayeluru
      @ayeluru 5 років тому +2

      saccha aadmi 😀

    • @Machaivelli
      @Machaivelli 5 років тому +10

      Usko chote Abdullah ka D bohot dinse nehi Mila he because of lockdown in Kashmir
      Isilie pagal hoke aise bolrahi hai

    • @shantanukajale
      @shantanukajale 5 років тому +1

      😂😂

    • @roaringbanjara9014
      @roaringbanjara9014 5 років тому +3

      Ndtv ek terrorist news channel hai aur jo is channel ko dekh ta hai uski maaka bhosda

    • @Mr007vikb
      @Mr007vikb 5 років тому

      Bhartiya Sanskar zindabad

  • @dnyanrajrns1227
    @dnyanrajrns1227 5 років тому +2

    Very good ThePrint

  • @vijayantonybabu9339
    @vijayantonybabu9339 5 років тому +1

    Sir please let us know if this will have impact on CBI case on demolition.

  • @pardeeptandon6730
    @pardeeptandon6730 5 років тому +4

    I wish the court should have also ordered day to day hearings in the Babri Masjid demolition case.... the judgement would have become more equitable.

  • @bimkivi
    @bimkivi 5 років тому +2

    No, the order under 142 doesn't become a law. In fact the order given under 142 , can't be used as a precedence, for other case/s.

  • @smoky3302
    @smoky3302 5 років тому +2

    I think this issue had been sort out and may not become a mess if the desicion had been taken on in the 50's 60's or 70's .

  • @AnirbanBandyopadhyay
    @AnirbanBandyopadhyay 5 років тому +2

    The law created in 1993, keep structures intact, Muslims did not follow that in Kashi and Mathura. They built an additional structures.

  • @harikrishnanpa8491
    @harikrishnanpa8491 5 років тому +3

    I got the answer for my question at 14:35

  • @GururajBN
    @GururajBN 5 років тому

    Brave attempt to summarize a huge judgment. Well done. But, I must add that in Mathura, the actual spot described as the place of Krishna's birth actually protrudes under the walls of the mosque. One has to stoop, enter through a rather small door to see this spot, where some idols are kept and worshipped. Without much ado, at least about 30' wide land should be given to the temple to straighten its boundaries to include the spot of Krishna's birth, and leave the mosque, otherwise intact.

  • @snsahu2002
    @snsahu2002 5 років тому

    Well said sir. thank you for helping us understand the court ruling.

  • @falsafayg
    @falsafayg 5 років тому

    Thanks for de cluttering. A comprehensive presentation. I believe that SC decision is fair. Though I have a few questions. How many judges were in the SC team? Is the decision unanimous? Was there any Muslim in the judges team?

  • @rajnishpsinha4683
    @rajnishpsinha4683 5 років тому +2

    Sir, it is great analysis of Judgement on Ayodhya. I am very happy that Ram temple will be build at his birthplace and that decision came by 5-0 from judges. Like you, I hope this is pave way for social harmony in coming years.

  • @RAMLAL-wx9rb
    @RAMLAL-wx9rb 5 років тому +4

    Always watch gupta's videos at 1.5 speed

    • @AbhishekSingh-oh3gi
      @AbhishekSingh-oh3gi 5 років тому

      It was difficult to understand while he was reading the para 😅

    • @RAMLAL-wx9rb
      @RAMLAL-wx9rb 5 років тому

      @@AbhishekSingh-oh3gi then go far 1.25 if u r beginner 😁 . Later u will crave for 1.5

  • @maymena17
    @maymena17 4 роки тому

    One of the most unconvincing efforts of SG and Cut the Clutter....

  • @markfatman7205
    @markfatman7205 5 років тому +6

    Shekhu - you can sleep well this night based on SC' assurance that this verdict won't set any precedent as Places of worship act will protect status quo in Mathura and Kashi.
    But then again will take just parliamentary session to revoke PoW act.

  • @piyush442
    @piyush442 5 років тому

    One of the best explanations of the verdict

  • @Akashkumar-oi7qt
    @Akashkumar-oi7qt 5 років тому +14

    1st FIR was filed against nihang sikhs bcz they performed havan iside the mosque

  • @swapnilorkey
    @swapnilorkey 5 років тому +2

    Excellent.. excellent.. excellent CTC.

  • @rajivjain9256
    @rajivjain9256 5 років тому

    Very very clear clutter

  • @aalokkumar6857
    @aalokkumar6857 5 років тому +2

    There's 3 Lakh active mosque in India, a country where Prophet Muhammad never visited. Its apart from Macca, Madina and Jerusalem, his birthplace and workplace.
    Now question from sulking muslim friends, where should I find Ram's birthplace????

  • @dapartyrokr
    @dapartyrokr 5 років тому +7

    Have been waiting since morning for this

  • @silent_traveller7
    @silent_traveller7 5 років тому +2

    Great Journalism, not sure many people even read 1045 pages verdict, yet they where arguing!

  • @shamikbhattacharyya6265
    @shamikbhattacharyya6265 5 років тому

    SHEKHAR SIR , I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU A QUESTION OVER AYODHHAVERDICT , WHY SUNNI WAQF BOARD WAS GIVEN 5 ACRE OF LAND SOMEWHERE IN AYODHHA IN LIEW OF 2.77 ACRE OF LAND ON WHICH THE DISPUTED " RAM MANDIR " WAS THERE , DOES THAT NOT MEAN PREVIOUSLY THAT " DISPUTED MOSQUE " WAS SETUP UNDER 2.77 ACRE OF LAND ?

  • @OnceMoreOm
    @OnceMoreOm 5 років тому

    Great Sir 🙏 thanks for increasing my knowledge

  • @ranganathans420
    @ranganathans420 5 років тому

    Modiji is true follower of values of Lord Ram and did not get provoked even by Swami to acquire the land but waited for SC to finalize. Dear Boss please be kind to recognize such greatness of Modiji when you wish to promote your dynast of congress party

  • @abuXana
    @abuXana 5 років тому +34

    Sir, You're a true gem ♥️

  • @justcurious40
    @justcurious40 5 років тому +1

    गंजा ये नहीं बताएगा कि मार्क्सिस्ट इतिहासकारों ने कैसे मुसलमानी को गुमराह किया । वरण मामला कभी का सुलझ जाता। दंगे फ़साद भी आ होते । ये गंजा भी मार्क्सिस्ट का हिमायती है ।

  • @yog-sadhna3415
    @yog-sadhna3415 5 років тому +14

    Shekhar, we have been killed and our temples broken for years. Around 50000 temples broken. Any muslim passing by just think about it and we never complain, only 1 temple.

    • @ga2747
      @ga2747 5 років тому +2

      Manas Arora who killed you looks like your very much alive 😅and commenting. 50000 temples how did you make up that figures,you have time machine 😂

    • @yog-sadhna3415
      @yog-sadhna3415 5 років тому +10

      @@ga2747 it is a fact covered by many history books. Just because we dont spread hate and not talk about it doent mean it did not happen

    • @ga2747
      @ga2747 5 років тому

      Manas Arora i can’t see 50000 temples though ,it just shows 2-3 that also not broken for religious reasons but for gold and treasures kept there .and it makes no logic of taking revenge of what happened 100 hundreds of years ago to the people who live now .Just because your ancestors couldn’t fight back then your finding ways to now to fight .

    • @yog-sadhna3415
      @yog-sadhna3415 5 років тому +5

      @@ga2747 no i dont want revenge. We dont believe in revenge. We just wanted what's ours.
      Even though i am happy with this and dont want any more of this, but we should not forget what happened in the past, how we suffered because if we do forget then we are bound to make the same mistake.
      Btw we have not taken anything from muslims. They are still given land just not the land where ram was born.

    • @vedakumar9759
      @vedakumar9759 5 років тому

      @@ga2747 our ancestors could not fight the barbarians bcos they followed a dharmic way of life , they followed rules even during a war. They were not prepared for the barbarians who followed no rules nor had any morals. They lost space by the time they understood what was happening and started fighting back and fought till the very end of mughul rule

  • @zendahodi558
    @zendahodi558 5 років тому +1

    Who is the looser in this historical judgment of Ram Mandir? Let we talk about who are the winner first. The main winner is the BJP and RSS who were the pioneer in demolishing the 500 year old Babri Masjid taking laws in their hands and are now getting full possession of the Babri Majid and political gold mines for the next 10 years until the Mandir is completed and inaugurated. (ii) Almost all the political parties who have no guts to take side of Muslim minority who has been marginalized just for the sake of not loosing Hindu votes. (iii) Few Muslim political leaders who got new platform to bring Muslims in their vote banks (iv) the five SC justices who accepted the Government's dictates to frame and approved the unjust verdict will surely get lucrative postings after their retirement, and now let see who lost? Of course India's secularism, Constitution and Unity did suffer very badly but among all the main looser is the prestige, reputation and image of the Supreme Court of India.The worst it has created historical precedent of demolishing non-Hindu religious place first by goons and then use AAshtha to convert it into a Hindu religious place. No one knows whether the goons who have demolished the Masjid will ever be punished or rewarded.