How These Enormous Landing Gear Can Support 400 Tons Aircraft

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 тра 2024
  • Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel for a discussion about how landing gear for massive Civilian and Military Planes is designed, constructed, and maintained.
    Fluctus is a website and UA-cam channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
    We publish 3 videos a week on our UA-cam channel and many more articles on our website.
    Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
    Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
    / fluctusofficial
    Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
    To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 391

  • @RianRahmat
    @RianRahmat Рік тому +101

    This video only explains the manufacturing process and the plane and does not explain at all how it works or how the wheels can actually support the weight of the plane.

    • @garygolfer3243
      @garygolfer3243 6 місяців тому +4

      The video shows the manufacturing process, the tools, the finished parts, the size of the finished parts, the assembly process, the size and types of aircraft, the different sizes relative to the aircraft and their real world testing methods. In other words, how it all works to support the weight of the plane. How did you miss all of that?

    • @kevindesouza6143
      @kevindesouza6143 6 місяців тому +3

      Yeah. What A WASTE.

    • @garygolfer3243
      @garygolfer3243 5 місяців тому +2

      @@BillStemil 🤣 You clicked on a 14 minute video expecting to see the maintenance manual of a 747 landing gear? Hell, I’ll sell you one and watch you complain it’s too long.

    • @garygolfer3243
      @garygolfer3243 5 місяців тому

      @@BillStemil So, you said ‘yes’ you wanted more engineering info in the video, then said ‘no’ you’re not complaining about the video. Then I suggest where you can get that info and you trigger. Hmmm, I’m glad you don’t fly real aircraft, you don’t have the temperament for it.

    • @user-vm6wf8zs2t
      @user-vm6wf8zs2t 3 місяці тому

      👍

  • @darrylm3627
    @darrylm3627 Рік тому +9

    Good Stuff,😄👍🏿 Proud Dad of an Air Force Airman

  • @jaclark8491
    @jaclark8491 Рік тому +20

    OK, so I’m just wondering, after watching the entire video: how does a landing gear support 400 tons of aircraft?

  • @josephsteffen2378
    @josephsteffen2378 Рік тому +9

    There was a hurricane that did some damage to Kuai, Iniki(?) 1992(?). A FEMA team was sent immediately. They brought a communication rig, generator and two fuel trucks...in a C5. Kauai has a short runway. No C5 had ever landed there(?). So, while the FEMA team was on the way, the Airforce flew a C5 from the Philippines...to try it out... That C5 landed alright.....but it was empty. My friend was on the C5 with the FEMA team....and all of their gear...really heavy! He said that he never heard the landing gear, tires and brakes roar so loudly.

  • @U.DJ.
    @U.DJ. Рік тому +89

    I remember when I was a kid long time ago at my grandfather's farm one day we heard a story one guy from our village bought an old landing gear at junk yard and he mounted the tyres on his tractor trailer , it took five men to set one tire for a whole day. He said this will last forever and he took a hammer and a knail try to puncture the tyre and nothing happens ......

    • @rossbryan6102
      @rossbryan6102 Рік тому +15

      IN BALDWIN KANSAS DURING WW2 THERE WAS AN SMALL TRUCKING COMPANY THAT HAD DIFFICULTY GETTING TIRES FOR THEIR TRUCKS!
      ON ONE OF THEIR DELIVERY ROUTES WAS AN MILITARY AIR BASE, AND THEY HAD A BIG PILE OF AIRPLANE TIRES THAT WERE REMOVED FOR SMALL DEFECTS,AND WERE CONSIDERED UNSAFE FOR AIRPLANE USE!
      THEY WERE GIVEN SOME AND THEY TOOK THEM HOME.
      THEY WERE ALSO BLACK SMITH AND METAL WORKERS AND MADE TRUCK WHEELS TO USE AIRCRAFT TIRES! THEY THEN HAD GOOD TIRES WITHOUT RATIONING!
      AFTER WW2 THEY STARTED ADAPTING AIRPLANE TIRES FOR FARM MACHINES TO WORK IN MUDDY FIELDS, AND THIS THEN BECAME A BIG BUSINESS, SELLING WHEELS AND AIRPLANE TIRES ALL OVER THE USA !

    • @MeaHeaR
      @MeaHeaR Рік тому +2

      OMG é Power-Phull Orrrsé-Strâylêans

    • @007supertime
      @007supertime Рік тому

      Can anyone could tell me ? this landing gear this strong carries all that weight, and the pressure of plane hitting the runway could evaporate after the crash ? like they told us the plane that hit the Pentagon just evaporated went up in smoke like the entire rest of the plane, boy that must be some special fuel LOL did anyone bought that BS explanation from the Government?

    • @C.Fecteau-AU-MJ13
      @C.Fecteau-AU-MJ13 Рік тому +8

      You mean he put aviation tires on his road transport prime mover or his attachment for his off highway farm tractor?... Cause I could see how the latter could probably work, but there's no way anyone is using them for a highway truck. Even if you used small ones, they're completely the wrong type of tire for the application and they wouldn't last long at all.

    • @rossbryan6102
      @rossbryan6102 Рік тому +1

      @@C.Fecteau-AU-MJ13
      YES HE USED THEM ON A ROAD TRUCK AND AGRICULTURAL USE ALSO!
      DURING WW2 TIRES WERE SEVERELY RATIONED IN USA !
      HOWEVER AT THE AIRFORCE BASE THEY WERE THROWING THEM AWAY IF HAD DEFECTS.
      THE BUSINESS OF TIRE AND WHEEL CONVERSION BECAME THE HEY MACHINERY CO AT BALDWIN KANSAS!
      THEY ARE STILL IN BUSINESS TODAY !

  • @gustavoheberle6265
    @gustavoheberle6265 Рік тому +54

    Very nice video ! After the engines, the landing gear is the second most expensive unit in any jet aircraft.

    • @davidrico52
      @davidrico52 Рік тому +1

      I would think avionics.

    • @Smakheed
      @Smakheed Рік тому

      @@davidrico52 I would actually say the Airframe was.

    • @ES-hv9nv
      @ES-hv9nv Рік тому +1

      @@Smakheed I think its the airframe too, particularly a heavy 12Y check

  • @gregbolitho9775
    @gregbolitho9775 Рік тому +6

    Yeh the C130s my fav transport. if we're lookin at amphibs, the Catalina, and fighter/bomber, the Mossie. Not overly fond of the ones, who only go as fast as they do if the arse or their wings are on fire. Glad you mentioned these blokes in the metal shop, they deserve more credit than they get!

  • @tettazwo9865
    @tettazwo9865 Рік тому +5

    "...painting with laser-like precision..." LOL!

    • @chadbroski342
      @chadbroski342 Рік тому

      The painting is the most important part if that’s not right than they have to redo everything

    • @tettazwo9865
      @tettazwo9865 Рік тому

      @@chadbroski342 say what?

  • @kz03jd
    @kz03jd Рік тому +12

    "This 747-8 is practing what's known as a rejected take off" Shows the plane taking off

    • @sabeillard
      @sabeillard Рік тому

      True... 🤣

    • @MrPaulSimone
      @MrPaulSimone Рік тому

      Saw that and was like...... Damn, guess he failed the test???

  • @philhand5830
    @philhand5830 Рік тому +4

    Superb engineering!!! What goes up must come down..... safely!!!

  • @jmw9904
    @jmw9904 Рік тому +8

    It would be nice if we put as much care into our roads as they do with the landing gears.

    • @garygolfer3243
      @garygolfer3243 5 місяців тому

      @@nyccollin That’s not a question, it’s an admission of mental defects and a cry for help. Please seek professional help.

  • @dongapoiii
    @dongapoiii Рік тому +14

    As mentioned earlier by Bill Luce, your facts need to be revised. The landing gears on the A380 were in fact design by two different companies. Safran designed the Nose Landing Gear and it's components, nothing else. United Technologies Aerospace Systems (formerly Goodrich Aerospace), turned Collins, now Raytheon Technologies designed and manufactured the mains; the body gears and wing gears.

    • @philhand5830
      @philhand5830 Рік тому

      What are body gears and wing gears???

    • @jehusaunders8482
      @jehusaunders8482 Рік тому

      The landing gear under the body and wing of the aircraft

  • @mckoylach1622
    @mckoylach1622 Рік тому +5

    Incredible human state of the art design,great achievements

    • @murimikaburu1376
      @murimikaburu1376 Рік тому +1

      How I wish people can also love one another in the same commitment!

  • @allymapinda8804
    @allymapinda8804 Рік тому +2

    I think these industrial workers also should be getting awards same as those who are in the battle field...

  • @mahmoodQureshikohatiPakistan

    Best beautiful sharing ❤️❤️🧡👍

  • @garymcmillin6257
    @garymcmillin6257 Рік тому +7

    Very interesting, thanks for the technology of the landing gear, had no idea

  • @tomm3695
    @tomm3695 Рік тому +5

    The most dangerous part of flying are the takeoffs. The fuel tanks are full, so that plane never weighs more, and it's rippin' down that runway with all that weight pressing down on those tires. A simple tire blowout would be cataclysmic. Once the plane arrives at its destination and it's ready to land, the fuel tanks, and therefore the plane itself weighs far less, so the tires aren't as stressed. A fellow passenger I had just met was nice enough to share this info JUST before taking off. I'll never forget it.

    • @apogee9973
      @apogee9973 Рік тому

      That just isn't true though, a blown tire isn't a catastrophic failure, and yes there is a lot of jet fuel, but you also have less momentum. It's also worth noting that taxi is the same as the runway in your example if not "more dangerous"" since you don't have enough speed to generate lift, which means all the weight is on the aircraft's wheels. As the aircraft is accelerating down the runway it builds up speed and therefore lift, as lift increases the weight on the wheels decreases which in turn makes it safer (in your flawed example). So, I wouldn't let that random guy scare you. Even assuming there was a blow out of the tires there is 2 on each wheel, which means you would have a backup and just abort the takeoff. (Which mind you is extremely rare.) Even assuming you had both tires blow out which has happened before look into the February 22nd, 2022, A plane headed to Phoenix with 142 passengers blew two tires during takeoff, but the jet stopped safely on the runway. Passengers were transferred to another plane, and no one was hurt.
      So, to summarize, this is just not true in any regard, so don't worry about anything in future flights. And if you really want to know the most "dangerous part" it is universally considered to be the landings. Since you are at the extremes of the flight envelope among other factors, and since statistically, nearly half of all fatal accidents have happened during the approach / landing phases of flight are the most dangerous.

    • @MaxLai_0104
      @MaxLai_0104 Рік тому

      Tire explodes, full reverse if speed below V1.

  • @ericvoge6678
    @ericvoge6678 Рік тому +35

    I worked just north of a c5 base for years. It always amazed me how quiet these behemoths were. They would fly over at just a couple hundred feet. Never heard them till after they flew over.

    • @byteme9718
      @byteme9718 Рік тому +9

      Should have worn those ear defenders early on before you lost your hearing. 😂

    • @scottallberry6713
      @scottallberry6713 Рік тому +3

      They make a very distinct whining sound. It's not a straight jet engine like on older b52s but I would never have said I never heard them until overhead

    • @byteme9718
      @byteme9718 Рік тому

      @@scottallberry6713 So do most Americans although you hear them half a mile away.

    • @seppokinnunen7923
      @seppokinnunen7923 Рік тому

      M

    • @nyccollin
      @nyccollin Рік тому

      Real question is why are 95% of the engines in front of the wing and always have been? Mandela Effect

  • @evangelista.tulande583
    @evangelista.tulande583 Рік тому +1

    Very good job, 🎉👏 congratulations

  • @kdwaynec
    @kdwaynec Рік тому +15

    Did anyone else realize that 28 tires on the C-5 divided by 4 engines works out to 7 tires per engine?

    • @tettazwo9865
      @tettazwo9865 Рік тому

      28 divided by 4 equals 7? You don't say!

    • @kdwaynec
      @kdwaynec Рік тому +7

      @@tettazwo9865 I know, it truly is astonishing, but I've run the numbers several times. Checked, double checked, cross checked and I keep getting the same result. Incredible!

    • @suedenym5827
      @suedenym5827 Рік тому +1

      Tbh that is kinda impressive. Those engines put out so much power you need 7 tires just to stop it

  • @michaelcesco2970
    @michaelcesco2970 Рік тому +17

    Fortunately they were very strong and well built. considering the weight of the plane and its passengers. Also having the means to withstand the force it takes to land. Also credit must be given to the pilot / copilot to land safely so that the front wheels don't bounce. I flew, ( for the first time last year to New Orleans ), and a friend told me to just relax, it'll be like going uphill in a car.

    • @josephsteffen2378
      @josephsteffen2378 Рік тому +1

      The landing gear on all aircraft get more stress than any other part on the plane. The landing gear must do this for many years. They still must be as light as possible.

  • @alifact2535
    @alifact2535 Місяць тому +1

    I wonder why aviation engineers do not make large parachutes that help stop large aircraft. This is a simple process and preserves the life of aircraft tires.

  • @FoxtrotAlpha173
    @FoxtrotAlpha173 Рік тому +1

    Marvel of Engineering 👌🔥🔥👌

  • @liaqatkhan321
    @liaqatkhan321 Рік тому

    An Engineering Marvel Reflecting Superhuman Effort . Just Amazing every bit of it .

  • @SuperLuminalElf
    @SuperLuminalElf Рік тому +2

    The A380 is a BEAST and a dinosaur that will be phased out of existence

    • @walterfink9782
      @walterfink9782 Рік тому +1

      That could be said for the B747, as it's a 4 engine jet, as well.
      But, the B747F could be around longer, maybe.

    • @elilop7709
      @elilop7709 Рік тому +2

      @@walterfink9782 not for freighter the 747 is the best aircraft for moving large amounts of cargo

  • @colinmiles1052
    @colinmiles1052 Рік тому +1

    Great recognition of the part Engineers play.

  • @David..
    @David.. 6 місяців тому

    Pretty much everything on commercial airliner is just insane levels of engineering an manufacturing that is so easy to overlook. Not only do you have the challenges of extreme environmental fluctuations and forces at play but the stakes of failure are catastrophic and on top of this these aircraft are used nearly constantly for decades. Pretty nuts.

  • @simongol8232
    @simongol8232 Рік тому

    super trabajo muy bien!!!

  • @user-wj4wf6ew1j
    @user-wj4wf6ew1j 2 місяці тому +1

    Very interesting technology subject

  • @williamdejeffrio9701
    @williamdejeffrio9701 Рік тому +1

    well done!

  • @joshualangdon3070
    @joshualangdon3070 Рік тому +5

    very intersting video; but that was not a tank that was loaded on the Galaxy, it is a self propelled artillery piece.

    • @jordenbronson8122
      @jordenbronson8122 Рік тому

      And what is a tank? 🤨😂

    • @tomstamford6837
      @tomstamford6837 Рік тому +1

      @@jordenbronson8122 Not a self-propelled artillery piece that's for sure!
      What's shown in the video is a Paladin M109a7 155mm Artillery System.
      In other words, not a tank. Cant be bothered to explain the difference, you can look it up yourself if you want to. But a tank... that ain't!

    • @joshualangdon3070
      @joshualangdon3070 Рік тому

      @@jordenbronson8122 a tank is an armored vehicle designed to support infantry assaults as well as the tip of the sword to punch a hole through an enemy's defensive line, and then attack and destroy the enemy's rear echelon. a self propelled artillery is not designed to punch holes through an enemy's defensive line and continue the attack. though it is used to support infantry assaults., mainly to "soften an enemy's defensive position from miles away. self propelled artillery is also used to fire from positions that towed artillery can not get access to.

  • @Psycandy
    @Psycandy Рік тому +16

    so the 'how these bogeys can support an aircraft' question is answered 'somehow'. The Antonov 225 nose gear can 'crouch' to assist loading and the thing has 32 wheels holding up 640 tons (or 1433600 pounds in USA speak) so it might be worth a mention. Also worth a mention are the cases where the landing gear failed and how the design evolved.

    • @maxboya
      @maxboya Рік тому +1

      I don’t think they’ll bring up that plane because of the animosity involved. Ukrainians don’t want to admit that the plane was actually built by the Russians. It becomes a finger pointing game. Too much conflict between the countries regarding the plane and what happened. Russia will take the plane and rebuild it. It is a historical plane and it’s not entirely destroyed. Just was damaged to where it’ll take some time to repair it. But it was a dated plane that needed to be updated and rehauled with newer and stronger components.

  • @tjonesauto
    @tjonesauto Рік тому +1

    Phoenix sky harbor is about to undergo a project to enlarge one of their jetway overpasses to handle these planes

  • @Nassau1604
    @Nassau1604 Рік тому +4

    talking about the landing gear, i'm always amazed the tyres withstand such pressure!

    • @marcmcreynolds2827
      @marcmcreynolds2827 Рік тому

      And they actually don't burst until twice the rated (maximum sin-service) pressure. They use a lot more rubber thickness and cord layers than car tires do.

    • @scottallberry6713
      @scottallberry6713 Рік тому

      26 ply (layers)tires and 200-250 psi. Car and truck tires are 4-6 ply and 30 psi

    • @marcmcreynolds2827
      @marcmcreynolds2827 Рік тому +1

      "(maximum sin-service) pressure"

  • @C.G.M.C.
    @C.G.M.C. Рік тому +10

    The Antonov An-225 Mriya was a strategic airlift cargo aircraft designed in the 1980s by the Antonov Design Bureau in the Soviet Union. It was originally developed as an enlargement of the Antonov An-124 to transport Buran-class orbiters, and only one example was ever completed. Yet the C5 plane has no comparison to the antenov

    • @jimmyjimmy64
      @jimmyjimmy64 Рік тому +2

      The only Antonov An-225 to be built was destroyed in the Russian-Ukrainian war

    • @maxboya
      @maxboya Рік тому

      You are correct ✅ 👍

  • @ytlongbeach
    @ytlongbeach Рік тому +5

    the enormous landing gear cna support the huge aircraft, because they are 1. under the aircraft, and 2. connected to the aircraft via huge metal things.

  • @cw6043
    @cw6043 Рік тому

    "tested successfully" - yet the tires flatten during that maneuver

  • @fredread9216
    @fredread9216 Рік тому +2

    Yes, they are very important. If the planes can’t fly, what good is a pilot?

  • @BigEightiesNewWave
    @BigEightiesNewWave Рік тому +3

    Do one of these on the BRAKES please.

  • @Digmen1
    @Digmen1 Рік тому +2

    Wow
    Imagine the load on those wheels and the landing gear whn one of those big planes lands.

    • @6thmichcav262
      @6thmichcav262 Рік тому

      True. I always wondered why they didn’t spin the wheels up close to landing speed to cut down on touchdown friction. Maybe someone tried it and it didn’t work?

    • @marcmcreynolds2827
      @marcmcreynolds2827 Рік тому +1

      @@6thmichcav262 That's been studied to death over the last sixty years. Turns out to be a lot more trouble than it's worth, regardless of the spinup method employed.

    • @marcmcreynolds2827
      @marcmcreynolds2827 Рік тому

      Landing loads can actually be less than takeoff loads. What's not obvious watching a landing is that at touchdown, most of the weight is still being supported by the wing until spoilers deploy. Also, stroking of the shock strut serves to reduce peak loads.

    • @6thmichcav262
      @6thmichcav262 Рік тому

      @@marcmcreynolds2827 Thank you for addressing that question for me!

  • @ellajames1114
    @ellajames1114 Рік тому +6

    I thought the video would explain how the landing gear works

    • @wazza7575
      @wazza7575 Рік тому

      Me too. Just general stuff about planes really.

  • @Twobarpsi
    @Twobarpsi Рік тому

    Nice video!!

  • @sclogse1
    @sclogse1 Рік тому +2

    With these skill sets and experience, these guys are still making military salaries..Great health care, free chow, subsidized housing, but if you were a civilian I bet the pay would be 40 an hour.

  • @yslee8062
    @yslee8062 Рік тому

    엄청나게 크네
    비행기도 이렇게 큰 화물을 이동 할수 있다니... 대단해요

  • @Dainis_971
    @Dainis_971 Рік тому

    Paldies Jums. Ļoti interesanti.☺️👍

  • @user-tj7vm2kg9m
    @user-tj7vm2kg9m Рік тому

    It's an airplane documentary that's very interesting to watch.

  • @nolanrussell518
    @nolanrussell518 6 місяців тому +1

    “This Boeing 747-8 is preforming what is called a rejected takeoff.”
    - Airplane takes off…

  • @alijee9289
    @alijee9289 Рік тому

    Interesting & Informative Video

  • @SuperBosing75
    @SuperBosing75 Рік тому +1

    This is really awesome and informative

  • @ArvindKumar-br5tn
    @ArvindKumar-br5tn 3 місяці тому

    Have a good afternoon

  • @capezyo
    @capezyo Рік тому +1

    Shurely beautifully parts of the plane..

  • @bryandale7125
    @bryandale7125 5 місяців тому +1

    That was a self-propelled Howitzer you called a tank.

  • @alexlaverick6111
    @alexlaverick6111 Рік тому +3

    Im pretty sure they stopped making the A380

  • @operator0
    @operator0 Рік тому +113

    It's hard to take you seriously after you claimed that the A380 "continues to be a popular option among major airlines", considering that Airbus halted production on the jet last year due to lack of customers.

    • @pradeepagrawal1119
      @pradeepagrawal1119 Рік тому +3

      It's consumes to much fuel, it's maintainance is more expensive than earning😅

    • @DhirajKPradhanAcutech
      @DhirajKPradhanAcutech Рік тому +1

      Hello! This is about the tyres.. so shut up already.

    • @ejkk9513
      @ejkk9513 Рік тому +10

      I think you misunderstood the video... those companies mentioned are still utilizing the A380. The video didn't say the plane was flying off of the store shelves... so to speak.

    • @pradeepagrawal1119
      @pradeepagrawal1119 Рік тому +2

      @@ejkk9513 bro check 1 more time, today's only UAE use A380, most of airways companies stop using, they use their other models

    • @operator0
      @operator0 Рік тому +1

      @@ejkk9513 Are you implying that airlines routinely chose between jet models they have in their inventory to serve various routs on a routine basis?
      "Hey Bob, which jet should we fly from New York to London today? The 737 or the A380?"
      "Continues to be a popular option" is understood by everyone except you to mean that many airlines are choosing to purchase the A380 instead of other aircraft, which is obviously incorrect.

  • @adamr8628
    @adamr8628 Місяць тому

    are you testing with the equivalent of full passengers and cargo on board?

  • @nilsonoliveira9146
    @nilsonoliveira9146 Рік тому +2

    Justamente por serem enormes é que eles suportam até mais do que 400 toneladas.

  • @bigpantsbobnuggets5051
    @bigpantsbobnuggets5051 Рік тому +1

    Good Stuff!

  • @alltechamazing3536
    @alltechamazing3536 Рік тому +1

    AMAZING

  • @matthewcornelius5862
    @matthewcornelius5862 2 місяці тому

    lmao.. "you trying to throw a part" the guy says to the dude using the 4 jaw chuck lol. love shop humor

  • @Raja-kr8ul
    @Raja-kr8ul Рік тому +1

    Excellent video sir. I enjoyed it

  • @421sap
    @421sap Рік тому

    Thank you!!

  • @shimronnetia
    @shimronnetia Рік тому

    Very impressive

  • @jeeplifeatl
    @jeeplifeatl Рік тому +3

    So, can landing gear support 400 tons? Through landing gears of different configurations. Got it. I thought sturdy tires and crazy air pressure might have something to do with it... my bad.

    • @marcmcreynolds2827
      @marcmcreynolds2827 Рік тому

      Pavement strength is what limits tire pressure BTW, to somewhere around 180 psi for larger airports. Going higher doesn't break the pavement instantly, but does wear it out faster over time via fatigue. Same idea as with metal fatigue, where the amount of load applied plays off against the number of cycles until damage or failure.

    • @michaelcesco2970
      @michaelcesco2970 Рік тому

      Do they consider passenger weight per person ? Some people, like football players weigh over 275 to 300 pounds each. I know lighter weight people ( like me ,175 ) , will average out total weight plane capacity. Does the plane roll over a scale before take-off.

    • @marcmcreynolds2827
      @marcmcreynolds2827 Рік тому +1

      @@michaelcesco2970 Scales might be used in special situations such as flight testing, and some airliners have built-in gear weight sensing.
      What's typically used in classic Weight & Balance calculations, where no direct measurements are made, is an assumed weight for the empty aircraft, the fuel taken on, and passengers plus bags. That can be a number like 220 lb per passenger including bags.
      I was once told that your (American) football players scenario is in fact what designs floor strength. For the aisle, where people actually walk, floor rigidity is also a consideration. Even if it's strong enough, a lot of flexing would be disconcerting.
      The above is for normal-sized airliners. For the smallest commuter planes, e.g. Cessna twins, passengers may be individually weighed and then seated so as to insure proper balance.

  • @musondag5436
    @musondag5436 Рік тому +1

    From landing gear documentary transition to military documentary 🥱

  • @MagnetOnlyMotors
    @MagnetOnlyMotors Рік тому

    3:50 burning brakes, what a stench !

  • @claudiusconruton2720
    @claudiusconruton2720 Рік тому +4

    The fact that the main parts of landing gear struts are hot forged titanium by VSMPO AVISMA Russia was ommitted here!
    Avisma is the only company that has the technology and 75000 ton presses to forge such large titanium components
    Boeing, Airbus, Embrair use Avisma
    Safran receive components from Avisma and does the final machining.
    Wingstrut forgings are also done by Avisma

  • @nabiladi4913
    @nabiladi4913 Рік тому

    Good work from liebherr

  • @dodupdatenews466
    @dodupdatenews466 Рік тому

    Powerful

  • @CarlosMorales-on1hq
    @CarlosMorales-on1hq Рік тому +5

    god bless every one here Jesus love you!! Always chose PEACE before WAR !!!

  • @jed-henrywitkowski6470
    @jed-henrywitkowski6470 Рік тому +1

    The "tank" you showed is not a tank, it is self-propelled artillery.

  • @sh_7075
    @sh_7075 Рік тому +1

    هذا مذهل حقآ

  • @Jonathan-NC
    @Jonathan-NC Рік тому

    So did the tores pop or pilots let air out. And if so how does that work

    • @karlzimmer683
      @karlzimmer683 Рік тому

      Safety plugs that burst at x temperature.

  • @larou14
    @larou14 Рік тому

    Very very impressive !!! ;-)

  • @Wongwanchungwongjumbo
    @Wongwanchungwongjumbo Рік тому +1

    The Boeing 777 family Aircraft have Triple Boggies 6 wheels under the Wings and 2 smaller on nose wheels types.

    • @Nightbotyearsago
      @Nightbotyearsago Рік тому +1

      The two smaller ones are Uhhhh… Attached

    • @MeaHeaR
      @MeaHeaR Рік тому +1

      I got tripplé boggeis in mié Nosé

  • @raulzamoravargas336
    @raulzamoravargas336 Рік тому

    BENDICIONES MY FRIENDS 🙏🙌

  • @colinmccarthy7921
    @colinmccarthy7921 Рік тому

    The landing gear is the Ingenuity of Engineering.This also applies to the
    engines,and all parts,and all systems found on an Aeroplane.I am an
    Engineer.

  • @felixmeyer1972
    @felixmeyer1972 Рік тому

    Das im Juni 2015 nach umfangreichen Renovierungsarbeiten eröffnete East-West Riverside Hotel begrüßt Sie direkt am Rhein im belebten Zentrum von Basel und nur einen kurzen Spaziergang über die Brücke von der Altstadt entfernt.

  • @guntherultraboltnovacrunch5248

    "How These Enormous Landing Gear Can Support 400 Tons Aircraft" It is because they landing gear are "enormous".

  • @encompassthyeclipse7278
    @encompassthyeclipse7278 Рік тому

    i think 400 tons is pushing it for single landing gear wheel assembly, considering steel parts shatter under loads as little as 20 tons. Methinks that number is for the safety inspectors and regulatory organisations

  • @josedelmarmattos182
    @josedelmarmattos182 Рік тому +2

    Tudo é feito dentro da engenharia. Se foi feito i projeto dentro dos conforme do peso, tem que suportar 🇧🇷🇧🇷

  • @ducksoff7236
    @ducksoff7236 Місяць тому

    Weird? I could have sworn "popular" meant there was a demand for the item. I didn't now the definition changed to quit buying and trying to get rid of. Interesting! Maybe you can do a video on how and when the word changed definition.

  • @redblade8160
    @redblade8160 5 місяців тому

    The Airbus 380 is so advanced that it is now in the scrapyard!

  • @aluri1997
    @aluri1997 8 місяців тому

    Good video.

  • @hipeopleidkwhatisgoingon
    @hipeopleidkwhatisgoingon Рік тому +1

    ah yes, 400 tons aircraft

  • @mikedfgfj
    @mikedfgfj Рік тому +1

    This is a good example of how you can spend 10 million dollars to get 2-3 millions in "savings".

  • @HECKproductions
    @HECKproductions Рік тому +1

    "continues to be a popular option"
    it is literally being discontinued because nobody wants them anymore

  • @Kodi5204
    @Kodi5204 Рік тому

    How come all the tires went flat after the brake test 4:17

  • @rogerrojas3358
    @rogerrojas3358 Місяць тому

    exacto, pueden soportar precisamente porque son enormes.

  • @tinashemakosa
    @tinashemakosa Рік тому

    Amazing

  • @ismadiautomotivechannel1544

    Wow amazing

  • @benbreshears2812
    @benbreshears2812 Рік тому

    would have been nice to talk about tires, I'm guessing there is nothing ordinary about them

  • @427Musclecar
    @427Musclecar Рік тому

    Wow! I tell ya though I wouldn't want to be responsible for those parts.

  • @cyrilmmojekwu9331
    @cyrilmmojekwu9331 Рік тому

    I just love the background music at 4:48

  • @davidrule1335
    @davidrule1335 Місяць тому

    Just what is "100% wore out breaks"?

  • @eduardodaquiljr1621
    @eduardodaquiljr1621 Рік тому +1

    there are a lot of landing gears bigger than a 380 like C5A,etc.

    • @dongapoiii
      @dongapoiii Рік тому

      I'm afraid to say that although the C-5 does have more landing gear legs and therefore more tires and brakes, the actual legs on the A380 are the largest of any aircraft that size; both the bodies and wings alike.

  • @floodway2955
    @floodway2955 Рік тому

    Take those planes down on of the streets in town. Winnipeg Canada and we'll see how long they last. Nice

  • @jhonkhan8153
    @jhonkhan8153 Рік тому +1

    THE WILD GEESE , Roger Moore

  • @skyghosts401
    @skyghosts401 Рік тому

    And enables I BEAM slideout wider than fuselage, more stable too, more even distribution on different quality surfaces landing on, making less dangerous to less affecting steering on initial touchdown..varying surfaces... greater chance of survival.. bad conditions with variables..

  • @timi7844
    @timi7844 Рік тому +2

    Airbus has stopped the A380 program down.

    • @PurpleObscuration
      @PurpleObscuration Рік тому

      ¿Why?

    • @timi7844
      @timi7844 Рік тому

      @@PurpleObscuration $$$

    • @TB-um1xz
      @TB-um1xz Рік тому

      @@timi7844 been awhile since they stopped the productions. What's your point?

  • @juacidasilvaramos4073
    @juacidasilvaramos4073 Рік тому +1

    Colocam o título em português,mas na hora do vídeo vacila .
    Podia pelo menos traduzir.