Amazing video!! But I feel much is lost of the true history of the people. Wasn't there an accusation during the early years after WW2 that the Soviets were trying to eliminate Tatar history and culture? I recall a US CIA memo regarding that topic around 1960 I believe. Great video of a great Historical people!
The colossal empire of Tartaria was wiped out so fast that their advanced technologies are exposed - since they don't want the public to know about their technologies, we are lied to about the timeline for our Earth - since old documents that tell us the WHEN and HOW and WHY for our entire timeline, the fraud is exposed.
I learned I had tatar blood in my early 20's when my son was born with a birth mark, the " mongolian spot". I was so scared and worried and couldnt sleep until pediatrician explained. At first I didnt get it and when I told my parents my father said laughing " your mother's grandmother was tatar"! And that is how I learned a family secret, something they never talked about. I was born in 🇷🇴. Since I found the truth I realized some physical and personality traits our family shares. They say tatars never give up when they set a goal, that they are not easily influenced by others, hard working, self determined and intelligent. My grandfather was the best man I ever knew, a true family man, a business man, a respected man in his town. I always knew he had something different but I didn't know what. I think we don't give genes enough importance bc we can't control nature but they have a big influence on who we are.
Selam ben Germanya'da doğan Türk. Senin yazdığının Latin harfleri ile buraya aktarıyorum: Selam Tatarlar, kem bu kommentariy ukıy. Sez elbet belesez, bezneng tarihı bik bay, hem anı saklarga kirek. Türkiye'de onu böyle söyleriz: Selam Tatarlar, kim bu yorumu (kommentarı) okuyor. Siz elbet bilirsiniz, bizim tarih pek zengin (bay), ve (hem) onu saklamak (muhafaza etmek) gerek.
True, In a video, the Ancient Relics of America, I found out the USA was settled by Danes, Welsh, Norwegian, Scandinavians, from 400AD on . But then in 1200 AD the Tartarians from the North (Canada) came down and wiped them all out! I assume they were the hordes of Genghis Khan! Why was this hidden from us.
Ok. I looked for information on how the Genghis Khan looked like. He was not red headed - he had reddish skin, like from wind and sun; he also didn’t have blue eyes, he was described as cat eyed, and in other description that he had light eyes which was referencing to him having heavenly ancestry - both descriptions are a simple mistranslation to 2 different languages in which the same description are used for different things. He looked like anyone in north parts of Asia adapted to conditions of the region. I don’t know about the rest of the video because those information suggested by the title is something I try to learn at the moment.
I voiced the English narration here - I now have finally seen the video. I think you have done a wonderful job, and thank you for the chance to work together with you on this video. ~Val Anderson
sir, you made so many mistakes when pronouncing such words as Tatar, khaganate, Genghis khan... it's not /tartar/, but /tatar/, not /kәgаgәnәt/ as you say it but /kagәnәt/, and not /geŋgis/ but /dʒeŋgis/ khan...
As a Greek I find the history and culture of the various turkic people's very interesting. Even though today Turkey and Greece consider each other enemies, I think a step to making better relations is by educating one another on the history of our diverse people
Tatars are a vastly different than Oghuz Turk like the ones in modern Turkey. Kipchak Turks who didn’t leave their ancestral lands. An offshoot did however go to modern day Bulgaria and established a union with the Slavs of that region.
i dont mean to be so offtopic but does anybody know of a way to log back into an Instagram account? I somehow forgot my password. I love any help you can give me
@Keagan Dylan I really appreciate your reply. I found the site through google and I'm in the hacking process now. I see it takes quite some time so I will reply here later with my results.
I'm trying to learn about tartaria bc I am a tartar from Uzbekistan and I have no information on tartare at all. Does anyone know anything more or have any theories?
This guy is rediculous! Horse,cattle husbandry was introduced by the ANCIENT SCYTHIANS NOT THE HUNS!! The vast majority of the asian step was Scythian tribes(white people) who in migrations filtered into Germania and scandinavia.PEOPLES WHO WORE PANTS AS FAR BACK IN HISTORY AS THEY CAN FIND. Horse masters the Getae, scythae,Ari, Alan's and Masegatae and many many more were indo european. And constantly refered to in ancient writings from china to middle east to Greece as tall heavily bearded warriors blonde,red hair with blue or grey eyes. Some of the first written mentions from china describe chinese cheiftens sending emissaries to Scythia to trade for their wonderful bigger faster horses... This presentation is a frustrating, progressive, politically motivated falsity and is easily discounted by anyone with brains enough to look into it!
and I stop at Attila's wife poisoning him...nobody knows if she did or didn't and most agree he wasn't poisoned and died from a nosebleed. There's a lot of misinformation on this documentary.
Dude; the pre-celts, the picts and celts in the highlands and lowlands of Britain were wearing trousers as well as kilts as early as 40bc according to Roman historians.
Remember celts were all over Europe spanning all the way to turkey but Romans got the best of ancient Gauls. I’m sure the huns were running rampant all over wearing their pants on horse back at that time.
The anti Iranian media and western propaganda is so strong these days but that shouldn't stop people from learning the facts. Scythians (Ancient Iranian nomads) are known to be the inventors of saddles ,stirrups and pants and horn bows ,there are evidance that these been of scythian lifestyle for at least a 1000 years before the huns .the Huns adopted these from scythians, alot later than the time as the persians did. All this entered Europe arround 500 A.D 6:42 this is Sasanian architecture and you can see many examples of them in Iran and other persian lands: Sarvestan palace Jabalie palace Ghoghnos mosque Everyone should have a well undrestanding that alot of eastern Europe and Asian cultures adopted the ancient Iranian cultures and lifestyles since we clearly see that this was what they preference. Some belive the tatars ,while you shouldn't know that tatars themselves adopted these from Scythians. There are archeology sources, greece sources, persian and islamic sources and paintings, and scythian jewelry and art described that scythians. The description of Turks in middle east is like that: Turks/tatars are horde people who move from land to land and pick what they find usefull or well designed, they have had nothing of their own. thats what they did for the past 2000 years. The tatars both in clothing and lifestyle and art were very similar to scythians although being from different origins and different backgrounds.
Genghis Khan didn't have red hair or blue eyes, he clearly had typical Mongoloid features depicted in portraits painted under supervision of his grandson khublai.
@@sulkoma I've heard that before, it's also false. And it's impossible that he had blue eyes. The only primary source giving a physical description of the Khan describes him as an "imposing man" with gray eyes.
My direct paternal ancestor was a Crimean Tatar Boyar - Mordko Kubrat Naryshko - and his son fell (was killed) at the Siege of Kazan in 1550, he was fighting in Ivan the Great's army. Mordko Kubrat Naryshko is also the direct ancestor of Natalia Kirillovna Romanova, née Naryshkina, the mother of Peter the Great. Mordko Kubrat Naryshko (the latter name being a nickname) was born sometime in the 1400s. He was a Tatar Boyar from Crimea, whence he left to go to Muscovy in 1462-63, and was a courtier at the court of Ivan III (1476). According to another version, he was captured by the Lithuanian prince Vytautas en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vytautas_the_Great among the Crimean Karaites, and arrived in Moscow as a bodyguard of Queen Sophia of Lithuania en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_of_Halshany. However, the patronym Kubrat goes much further back. Excerpt: "Long before the Mongols, the Eurasian steppe was dominated by another great Turkic empire, the Proto-Bulgars, whose state was centered around the Sea of Azov (modern Russia and Ukraine). Known to be equally as skilled in nation building as in warfare, they built massive stone citadels wherever they set foot. Under the legendary Khan Kubrat, the Proto-Bulgar empire came to cover much of the Black Sea Coast." Source: www.rbth.com/travel/328983-bolgar-russia-mysterious-muslim-city
Chinggis Khaan wasn't from Black Tatars. He was Borjigin of Mongol. Mongols and Tatars had long time vengeance to each other. Chinggis khaan finally crushed Tatar with alience of Jin dynasty. And after that he executed all Tatar men who are taller than a wheel of the carriage. There is no way Chinggis Khaan had red hair and blue eyes. If he had, so then why all his sons, grandsons, grand grandson's portraits have black hairs, brown eyes, and central Asian faces.
baagii baagii !!! Don't be so sure of yourself. This guy's name is OGEDEI! GENGHİS KHAN son !You see, he looks like his father. So red hair and blue eyes 😉 upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/YuanEmperorAlbumOgedeiPortrait.jpg
I usually do not comment on youtube......but regarding this clip I think the author has made a serios error......i'm pretty sure that Genghis Han ruled the Mongol Empire and not the Golden Horde...the Golden Horde formed after the death of Genghis Han.....also the author paints the soviets in a good light whithout mentioning their grave crimes......the execution of the President of the shortlived Crimean Peoples Republic (arguably the first muslim democratic republic)Noman Çelebicihan and chopping his body and throwing the body parts into the sea.......also the genocide commited after the ww2 in the form of Stalin's massive deportations to Central Asia and Siberia.......and related to Tatarstan there was the orchestrated great famine of 1921-1922.....that specifically targeted the volga tatars.....some figures show as many 2million deaths......also there is the 1932-33 famine that is still debated if it was orchestrated or not because of it's scope.........in conclusion do not praise the soviets.......they are at the same level as Ivan the Terrible......for tatars only Death and Miserry came from the hands of the soviets
A tatar cavalry regiment was hired by Charles X Gustav of Sweden and after the peace with Denmark1658 the soldiers were dispersed to the farmers in the conquerred province of Bohuslän north of Gothenburg. After a few years the farmers were in uproar because of the many problems which was caused and the regiment was sent back to Tatarstan but it seems as if some of the population were related to them and the town of Uddevalla was called Tatarstan after that and people could be called tattar devils if they annoyed the population after that even if they were not related to them. But I can say I thought there were too many mean types in that city as I recall!
Sergey Rachmaninov was a great composer of Tatar heritage. Is there any Russian who does not have Tatar blood, and why do so many Tatars look Scandinavian, like violinist Alina Ibragimova with her blond hair and blue eyes. Furthermore, Tataria is in Europe.
@@amann9963 Not every Tatar is mixed with a russian lol. I know a lot of pure Tatars without russian blood that have blonde or red hair and blue eyes. They inhereted it from Finno-Ugranians
@@discodirk48 But this is Tatar history told by the Tatars, haven't you seen who made and uploaded this? And according to your nonsense they lost their global empire...so your bs conspiracy theory falls apart.
Black Tatar is a Chinese classification for steppe people based on their levrl of Sinicization. NOT an ethnic classification. There were 3 classes of Sinicization. White Tatar Sinicized Black Tatar somewhere in the middle Raw Tatar basically barbarians. Chingis was a Mongol. Not a Tatar. And according to Plano Carpini, they didn't particularly like being called Tatars. It's just a historical quirk that this name was given to them in the West.
@Sercan Şimşek The name MONGOL is originated from the phrase "Monkh(tengeriin)Gal" which means "Eternal Flame of sky". Later it became "MonkhGal". In Mongolian traditional script, "Monggol" and "MonkhGal" are written same but pronounced different. Even in old Mongolian flag, you can see "Sun, Moon, Flame in blue sky". Hundred years before Chinggis khaan, there was Khamag Mongol(Whole Mongol) led by Khabul Khan. the name Mongol was mentioned in Kitans books in 11th century. So how the hell this name is Turkish and Human's name? Do you have any proof?
I wonder if the Jewish world or father as TATY (TATI in European language) has anything to do with the TATA or TATA(RS) as a father (as it said the great Kahn was called as well... due to that the he took a lots of Jewish with him and they settled later all over in Europe as they been taken too. i wonder if the two world is associated.
at 1:41 : "the european fashion of wearing trousers, came from the huns" was when I stopped, but already cringed hard after hearing about the alleged boring pan-european situation during that time
In addition, runic is not ancient Turkic language. It is not invented by Turkic. Runic is a Northern European Germanic script. The same runic stones monuments are commonly found in Northern Europe.
The huns with Atila was also in Danmark. We have places named after them. Hundested, Hundige, Hundsvig. It is also mentioned in the sagas. The word Russ came from slavic tribes calling the vikings russ, the vikings put together Rusland/russia and rulled over the slavic tribes.
@@mr.purple1779 read this: SH. MARJANI INSTITUTE OF HISTORY OF THE TATARSTAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD THE GOLDEN HORDE IN W ORLD H ISTORY Kazan 2017 Foreword Rafael Khakimov Full-scale research on the Ulus of Jochi (the Golden Horde) did not begin until as recently as the 1990s, when ideological restrictions imposed by the government were finally lifted. This primarily concerned the Resolution on the State and Measures for Improving Political and Ideological Awareness Raising in the Tatar Party Organization by the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), dated 1944, which prohibited studies on the history of the Golden Horde and Tatar khanates, as well as any popularisation of the epic ‘Edigu’. The Falsification of Tatar history was remarkably crucial to the success of Soviet policy. It was during the height of the WWII, with all of the country's resources already tied up, and long before the conquest of Berlin that the government found it necessary to prohibit research on the Golden Horde. Stalin believed Tatar history to be as important as achieving victories on the front. This ideology was designed to confine Tatar history to covering local events in the Volga Region and presenting the Tatars as descending from the Volga Bulgars, known for their heroic resistance to the Tatar-Mongol invasion. But at the same time, Tatars also acquired a negative image as Asians who had interrupted the natural course of Russian history. These doctrines was powerful enough to give rise to a Bulgarist political movement to rename Tatars to Bulgars and Tatarstan to Volga Bulgaria. The most zealous of its advocates wanted passports stating ‘Bulgar’ instead of ‘Tatar’ as their nationality, and would also register as Bulgars, not Tatars, during censuses. Ultimately, it was Perestroika that brought about a decline in Bulgarist activities, and nowadays the movement is seen as a rather exotic rudiment of the Soviet era when historical myths ran rampant. The turbulent political events of the 1990s stirred up the public, causing a surge in Tatar self-awareness, and Perestroika lifted the restrictions on research regarding the Golden Horde and Tatar khanates. This signaled the end of governmental ideological control. Academic institutions independent of the Russian Academy of Sciences were thus established in Tatarstan, while the Russian academic community endured the time of turbulence without any real interest towards Tatar history. Moreover, a number of Russian historians advocated for an unbiased approach to the Golden Horde. After state sovereignty of Tatarstan was declared in 1990, followed by the bilateral agreement on the division of powers between Kazan and Moscow in 1994, Tatarstan enjoyed an economic and cultural upswing. Borders were opened, international connections to academic centres were consolidated, and now that the republic was engaged in extensive foreign relations, self-consciousness of Tatars and Tatarstan's inhabitants was growing stronger every day. Tatars wanted an unbiased history for themselves, as textbooks and periodicals continued to be printed with barbaric images of their people, still presenting the Golden Horde as a source of savagery, humiliation to the Russians and a threat to Europe as a whole. A number of Russian politicians even tried to promote the Battle of Kulikovo to the status of a Russian national holiday, which was promptly prevented by Tatarstan's government. It was under these circumstances that large-scale research began on the Golden Horde, the first major milestone of which was The International Scientific Seminar titled ‘Source Studies on the History of the Ulus of Jochi (the Golden Horde). From Kalka to Astrakhan. 1223-1556’ on June 23-26, 1998. [3]. In later years it was followed by a series of conferences that eventually transformed into the ‘Golden Horde Forum’, a regularly held conference. The varied and diverse approaches to issues related to the Golden Horde ultimately yielded the dedicated volume titled ‘The Ulus of Jochi (Golden Horde). 13th Century-Mid- dokumen.pub/the-golden-horde-in-world-history.html Brief history of suvar-bulgars Ювенальев Ю. Ю., ЮвенальеЮвенальев Ю. Ю., Ювенальев С. Ю. Культура суваро-булгар. Этническая религия и мифологические представления. - Чебоксары, 2013. - 128 с., илл. The off-springs of the ancient Suvar-Bulgars - the modern Chuvash people are the fifth most populous nation in Russia. They live mostly in the Volga Region, where their first in the Eastern Europe middle aged state Volga Bulgaria was situated. To be more exact, it is the territory of modern Samara Oblast, Ulyanovsk Oblast, the Chuvash Republic and some parts of the territories of the Mari El Republic, the Udmurt Republic, the Republic of Bashkortostan and Penza Oblast. This Part of the Volga Region bounds on the territory, where Finno-Ugric peoples the Mari and the Mordvins live on one side, and on the territory of the Turkic people Tatars and the Slavic people on the other side. According to genetic and linguistic data the culture of the Chuvash (the Suvar-Bulgars) stands apart. Thus it differs as from the culture of the Slavic people and from the culture of Finno-Ugric and Turkic peoples as well. The names of the peoples, living in the Volga Region are well-known from the earliest times. But as far as the word ‘Chuvash’ is concerned, it appears in the written sources only since the 16th century. xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars
@@gorurtartar7947 The Volga Tatars have very little in common with the Kipchak Tatars of the golden horde. Tatars are mainly Europo-Eurasian people. If you are a Mongol, who were also called Tatars, then just stop imposing on us relatives. And back off. Mitogenomic data indicate admixture components of Asian Hun and Srubnaya origin in the Hungarian Conquerors January 2018 "Our results show that the Conquerors assembled from various nomadic groups of the Eurasian steppe. Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. Phylogenetic results reveal that more than one third of the Conqueror maternal lineages were derived from Central-Inner Asia and their most probable ultimate sources were the Asian Scythians and Asian Huns, giving support to the Hungarian Hun tradition. The rest of the lineages most likely originated from the Bronze Age Potapovka-Poltavka-Srubnaya cultures of the Pontic-Caspian steppe." "Our data testify closest genetic relation to this modern population. Volga Tatars incorporate three main ethnic components [53]; the Volga Bulgars, which arrived in the 8th century, and intermingled with local Scythian and Finno-Ugric populations, then in the 13th century Kipchak Tatars of the Golden Horde brought a final Central-Inner Asian genetic layer and their language to the region. MITOMIX seems to identify these historical components, as Finno-Ugric Mansis and Khantys (Yug) comprise a major component of Volga Tatars besides Russians, while Scythians also appear among their potential sources (S5F Table). Our remarkable result is that the Conquerors seem to provide a predominant (26-41%) component of Volga Tatars (S5F Table), while the opposite value is significantly lower (9-26%; S5A Table). This asymmetry is due to the absence of some Tatar components, like Finno-Ugric ones, from the Conquerors. Thus our data indicate that rather Volga Tatars harbor a “Conqueror like” genetic component than the opposite, which may be linked historically to the Volga Bulgars."
@@mr.purple1779 stop lying! "ittle in common with the Kipchak "-because Tatars killed many Kipchaks Роджер Бэкон, знавший положение дел на территории Монгольской империи как из отчетов путешественников, так и из личных бесед с Рубруком, записал следующее: «И эта земля вся принадлежала куманам, которые назывались каптаки; но тартары совершенно разорили ее и перебили куманов, кроме части их, бежавших в Венгерское королев-ство и ставших его данниками»; «аланов же не существует, ибо тартары вторглись в эту землю и вынудили куманов бежать до самой Венгрии; а куманы - язычники, и такими же были аланы, но они истреблены»; «тартары же населяют землю аланов и куманов от Дуная и далее, почти до самых отдаленных областей востока»; «и в этой земле (между Та-наисом и Этилией. - В.К.) жили куманы, но тартары всех уничтожили, как и с другой стороны Танаиса, до самого Дуная, как говорилось»; «а вся эта земля тартарская от Танаиса до самой Этилии принадлежала куманам, которые назывались канглами, [но] они все были истреблены тартарами»; «далее, за Этилией, находится третье тартарское княже-ство; и ими уничтожены местные народы, а жили там куманы-канглы, как выше [говорилось]»; «Кумания была величайшей из земель. Ведь куманы обитали от Дуная до той самой земли, в которой пребывает император, и все они перебиты тартарами, кроме тех, которые бежали в Венгерское королевство» [Матузова, 1979, с. 212, 213, 215]. vostlit.info/Texts/rus15/Bacon_Roger/text1.phtml Император Фридрих II: «И вот, убивая и грабя... упомянутые татары пришли в обильно насе-ленную местность куманов. И так как они не щадят своей жизни… [то] они наголову разбили [куманов]. А тех, кого не спасло бегство, сразил их кровавый меч» Генрих Распе: «Даже команы, люди воинственные, не смогли в земле своей выстоять против них, но двадцать тысяч команов бежали к христианам; и готовы они сражаться против каждого народа, кроме вышеупомянутого [т.е. татар]» После этого они ушли в сторону кипчаков, наиболее многочисленных из тюрок, убили всех, кого только они встретили, а остальные бежали в леса и вершины гор, покинув свою страну, которой овладели татары. Все это было совершено ими в самое короткое время, так сказать, походом, и только! Ибн аль Асир. An interesting fact, by the way, the Kipchaks were brothers to the medieval Tatars (our ancestors) Ибн аль Асир Тогда татары послали сказать кипчакам: “Мы с вами одного рода (происхождения), а эти аланы вам не родня, чтобы вы им помогали, и их религия не похожа на вашу. Мы вам даем обещание не трогать вас, и мы вам дадим сколько хотите денег и одежды, если вы не будете вмешиваться между нами и ими”. И действительно между ними состоялось соглашение относительно количества денег, одежды и т. д., которые они (должны были) дать им (кипчакам) и они действительно преподнесли им (кипчакам) то, о чем было уговорено, после чего кипчаки покинули город аланов: и на них напали татары, многих из них перебили, ограбили и увели в плен. www.vostlit.info/Texts/rus/Athir_2/text6.phtml?id=7971 " If you are a Mongol, "-Medieval Mongols politonym.Which included medieval Tatars our ancestors.Like Russians today.Read this: «В настоящее время, вследствие благоденствия Чингис-хана и его рода, поскольку они суть монголы, - [разные] тюркские племена, подобно джалаирам, татарам, ойратам, онгутам, кераитам, найманам, тангутам и прочим, из которых каждое имело определенное имя и специальное прозвище, - все они из-за самовосхваления называют себя [тоже] монголами, несмотря на то, что в древности они не признавали этого имени. Их теперешние потомки, таким образом, воображают, что они уже издревле относятся к имени монголов и именуются [этим] именем, - а это не так, ибо в древности монголы были [лишь] одним племенем из всей совокупности тюркских степных племен» (Рашид ад-Дин. Т. I. Кн. 1. С. 103). Мэн да бэй лу Теперь татары называют себя Великим монгольским государством, и поэтому пограничные чиновники именуют их [сокращенно] мэн-да. Но [эти] два государства отстоят друг от друга с востока на запад в общей сложности на несколько тысяч ли. Неизвестно почему [они] объединены под одним именем. Ибо в период процветания государства Цзинь были созданы северо-восточное вербовочно-карательное управление для обороны от монголов и Кореи и юго-западное вербовочно-карательное управление для контроля над территорией татар и Си Ся. Монголы, очевидно, занимали [земли, на которых находились] двадцать семь круглых крепостей того времени, когда У-ци-май начинал дело, а границы татар на востоке соприкасались с Линьхуаном, на западе располагались в соседстве с государством Ся, на юге доходили до Цзинчжоу и достигали государства Больших людей на севере”. Прежнее монгольское государство уже было уничтожено и что нынешние монголы и есть татары. В Гу-цзинь цзи-яо и-пянь Хуан Дун-фа сказано: “Существовало еще какое-то монгольское государство. [Оно] находилось к северо-востоку от чжурчжэней. Во времена цзиньского Ляна [оно] вместе с татарами причиняло зло на границах. Только в четвертом году нашего [периода правления] Цзя-дин [1211 - 1212] татары присвоили их имя и стали называться Великим монгольским государством”.
@@mr.purple1779 "Our data testify..."-What?!😅 Medieval Tatars are close to us ,modern Tatars!Read this: Molecular Genealogy of a Mongol Queen's Family and Her Possible Kinship with Genghis Khan Eastern Russian Tatars, Bashkirs, and Pakistani Hazara were found to carry R1b-M343 atunusually high frequencies of 12.65%, 46.07%, and 32%, respectively, compared to otherregions of Eastern Asia, which rarely have this haplotype (Fig 3)[40,42,43,49-53]. Interest-ingly, ancestors of those 3 populations were all closely associated with the medieval MongolEmpire. That is, Russian Tatars and Bashkirs are descendants of the Golden Horde (alsoknown as the Ulus of Jochi) that had been controlled by Jochi, the first son of Genghis Khan,and his descendants during the 12th-15thcenturies. In addition, some of the Hazara tribes arebelieved to consist of descendants of Mongolian soldiers and their slave women after the 1221siege of Bamiyan under the leadership of Genghis Khan [54,55]. Through domination ofHazara, Mongolians strongly influenced the genetic makeup of the Hazara people, especially inPakistan [49,54,56]. Some modern Hazara populations resemble Mongolians in their physicalattributes including facial bone structure. Similarly, the high frequency of R1b-M343 in geo-graphic regions associated with the past Mongol khanates including the Golden Horde (fromUral Mountain to Western Siberia, which includes Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, Azerbai-jan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan), Ilkhanate (Iran and neighboring territories including Arme-nia, Turkey, Georgia, Afghanistan, Syria, and Tajikistan), and Chagatai Khanate (from the Aralsea to the Altai mountain, including Pakistan (Hazara), Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan,India, and China), strongly suggest a close association between the Y haplotype R1b-M343 andthe past Mongol Empire (Fig 3)[42-44,49-53] www.researchgate.net/publication/308121873_Molecular_Genealogy_of_a_Mongol_Queen's_Family_and_Her_Possible_Kinship_with_Genghis_Khan "Volga Tatars incorporate three main ethnic components [53]; the Volga Bulgars, "-do not lie! Only descendants of the Volga Bulgars Chuvash!Read this: www.jstor.org/stable/23658336 Чувашский язык, который так сильно отличается от остальных тюрко-татарских языков, принадлежит народу, который со всей уверенностью следует рассматривать в качестве наследников волжских булгар. М.Рясянен. Чуваши потомки волжских булгар.Чуваши на Средней Волги жили задолго до нападения татар.Дунайские хаган-болгары и Кубанские чёрные болгары связаны с ними. А.А.Куник. Do not forget that the medieval Tatars exterminated many Volga-Bulgarians.Therefore, the Volga Bulgars could not seriously affect the ethnogenesis of the medieval Tatars! Even the Kazan Tatars have nothing to do with the Volga Bulgars!Read this: МАТВЕЙ МЕХОВСКИЙ ТРАКТАТ О ДВУХ САРМАТИЯХ DE DUABUS SARMATIIS Глава третья. О татарах козанских и татарах ногайских. Третья орда - козанских татар - названа так по замку Козан, стоящему над рекой Волгой у границ Московии, где они живут. Они произошли от главной татарской орды, а именно от чагадайских или заволжских татар, как и все другие татары. www.vostlit.info/Texts/rus15/Mehovskij/frametext2.htm БЛЕЗ ДЕ ВИЖЕНЕР ОПИСАНИЕ ПОЛЬСКОГО КОРОЛЕВСТВА (1573) LA DESCRIPTION DY ROYAUME DE POLOGNE Татары третьей орды называются казанскими, по имени крепости Казани, расположенной на реке Волге на границе с Московиею; они поселились здесь, отделившись, подобно прочим, от главной джагатайской орды. Казанская орда располагает 12,000 человек, способных носить оружие, а в случае необходимости могла бы стянуть до 30,000, призвавши на помощь своих союзников. www.vostlit.info/Texts/rus14/Vizhener/text.phtml?id=395 You are not Tatar and we both know it very well!🤣😃😁
@@mr.purple1779 We Tatars are not Volga Bulgars! Н. А. Баскаков К ВОПРОСУ О КЛАССИФИКАЦИИ ТЮРКСКИХ ЯЗЫКОВ (Известия АН СССР. Отделение литературы и языка. - Т. XI. Вып. 2. - М., 1952. - С. 121-134) А. ЗАПАДНОХУННСКАЯ ВЕТВЬ ТЮРКСКИХ ЯЗЫКОВ Западнохуннская ветвь тюркских народов исторически сложилась из тюркских племен, продвинувшихся на запад с древнейших времен и входивших последовательно в западнохуннский, а отчасти для некоторых племен и союзов исторически в более позднее время и в западно-тукюйский племенные союзы, из которых образовались крупные родо-племенные объединения и языки: 1) булгары и булгарская группа языков,. 2} огузы и огузская группа языков, 3) кыпчаки и кыпчакская группа языков, 4) карлуки и карлукская группа языков. Характерными особенностями тюркских языков западнохуннской ветви, отличающими эти языки от языков восточнохуннской ветви, являются: В фонетической структуре: а) замещение древних з, д, т > либо древним р либо й, например, ура, айак, "нога" вместо адак, азак, атах и пр.; б) большая степень дифференциации глухих и звонких согласных: б - п, к - г, с - з, д - т; в) наличие дифференцированных согласных фонем х, в, h и пр. Различия в основном словарном фонде и в словарном составе и, в частности, наличие значительного количества заимствованной лексики из языков арабского и иранских и относительно меньшее количество заимствований из монгольского языка. В грамматическом строе: а) более развитая структура сложного предложения и наличие большего количества союзов и в том числе заимствованных из других языков; б) меньшее количество стяженных сочетаний: слов, выступающих в качестве сочетаний имен и глагольных форм, и т. п. Перечисленные здесь основные признаки отличают все тюркские языки западнохуннской ветви от тюркских языков восточнохуннской ветви. I. Булгарская группа языков Булгарская группа языков, к которой относятся: древние языки - булгарский, хазарский и современный чувашский язык, - образовалась в среде древнейшего населения Поволжья болгар или булгар (VI-XIV вв.), а также более поздних по времени дунайских булгар и хазар, непосредственных преемников племен, входивших в состав западных хунну, современными потомками которых являются сохранившие древний строй языка чуваши. Характерными признаками языков булгарской группы и в частности чувашского языка, по которым он отличается от языков других групп, входящих в западную ветвь, являются: В фонетической структуре: а) наличие особой системы вокализма, состоящего из трех широких и шести узких фонем; б) замещение некоторых гласных в начале слов языков других групп дифтонгами и дифтонгоидными сочетаниями, например: йерт- "водить" (вм. ерт-), йeкев "подпилок" (вм. егеу), йeр "след" (вм. из), вут "огонь" (вм. от), вырaн "место" (вм. орын) и пр.; в) явление ротацизма, т. е. замещения чередующихся согласных с/з ~ т/д ~ й в других языках согласным р - например, в конце слов з/с > р: caвар (вм. агыз || авыз) "рот", пар (вм. буз) "лед", хeр (вм. кыз), кeр (вм. кyз) "осень" и пр. - и в середине слов, например, ура (вм. адак, азак, айак и пр.) "нога" и т. д.; г) явление ламбдаизма, т. е. замещения согласного ш ~ с других языков согласным л, например, хeл (вм. кыш ~ кыс) "зима", тeлeк (вм. тyш ~ тyc) "сон", алак (вм. ишик, есик) "двери" и пр. В основном словарном фонде: а) наличие в лексике значительного слоя слов, характеризующих только данную группу и отсутствующих в других тюркских языках, ср., например: caмса "нос", cурaм, каcaн "спина", арaм "женщина", cатма "сковорода", курка "ковш", cеcе "нога", тулa "пшеница", мaйaр "орех" и др., а также значительного слоя слов, общего по происхождению со славянскими словами, и лексики, общей по происхождению с угро-финскими языками. В грамматическом строе: своеобразие морфологии и синтаксиса, в значительной степени отличающихся от морфологии и синтаксиса языков других групп.
"From the 15th to 18th centuries Crimean Tartars frequently raided Eastern Slavic lands to capture their inhabitants, enslaving an estimated three million people predominantly Ukrainians. " Wikipedia 1)Kizilov Mikhail -"Slave trade in the early modern Crimea"-Oxford University 2)Alan Fisher-Black sea slave trade-Canadian American Slavic studies,1972
Yeah... as an eastern european it bothers me that fellow slavs blame the turkish empire for what the Crimean Khanate was doing. I get where the confusion is coming from. Turkic ethnicity and islamic religion. The turks of turkey however aka the ottomans were a very ahead of their time ppl More civilized and tolerant than our neighbors to the west were at the time. The Crimean Khanate however was ruthless.
2:22 now I know the origins of the Romanian word "Cazan" wich means cauldron; it seems like it was borowed from the golden horde at some point in time when we were conquered. Things like this are fascinating, since they can give you insides of that country's history and the people who invaded it!
At 15:24 I can read: "We are here" - that is cool given the fact that I speak not Tatar but Turkish. So both languages seem to differ only in dialects.
7:10 ... Chengez Khan was tall, red hair and blue eyes ... a typical European ...everyone tells me that Americans are not well educated ... you, sir, have proven it. The word Europe never existed until in recent years, some 5,000 years ago ... All modern Europeans are the progeny of the Fertile Crescent ... The word Europe stems from the Phoenician word Ereb, meaning West ... Mediterranean Sea was their Lake. They ruled from ancient to as late as 5 BC. They invented Alphabet, Seafaring / Marine, City Planning, Trade, Arts and Technologies ...Greek Cadmus is Phoenician Qadi Musa, who came to Greece and taught them Alphabet and the rest. I meant no disrespect to you, however, facts are facts.
The true appearance of Chinghiz Khan, the real History of the Tatars and many of Turkic peoples: Perhaps you know, that an outstanding historian-scientist D. Iskhakov wrote: ‘the true history of the Tatars, of the people in every respect historical, is not written yet’. However, recently were published books about the unwritten (hidden) real history of the Tatars by independent Tatar historian Gali Yenikey. His books present a new, or rather ‘well-forgotted old’ information about the real history of the Tatars and other Turkic peoples. It must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists. However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia: According to data of many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ (an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This confirmed by many little known facts. So in fact Chinghiz Khan was from among the medieval Tatars and the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples. It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (in Tatar means 'Great Scripture'). But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu... So that the Tatars of Chinghiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among the Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others. And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations... About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, which was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of the dooks by Gali Yenikey, translated in Engilsh. There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet: payhip.com/b/Xujb On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chinghiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chinghiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chinghiz Khan: ‘My son Chinghiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chinghiz Khan...’. And here's another interesting thing: We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeiev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’. But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): ua-cam.com/video/3WqB71gs5bc/v-deo.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after. This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources. This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.
Tatar was a name used by many people meaning different things in different times. Mongols were called Tatars by both the Chinese and Russians until relatively recently. Turkic Kaganate recorded nomadic tribes in northeastern Mongolian Plateau as Tatars. And Mongols recorded Mongolic tribes who didn't join the Empire as Tatars. The original meaning was OTHER PEOPLE or OUTSIDERS.
@@yo2trader539 alas, you have repeated here the false dogmas of the official "history of the Mongols". Read carefully this article by Vakil, or better the works by the independent historian Gali Yenikeiev.
@@yo2trader539 sure. But not only this source - the writings of an independent historian Gali Yenikeiev contain information from many historical sources, including those that are ignored by official historians, since this information refutes the false official "history of the Mongols". Read more, know more, so as not to remain in captivity of false dogmas.
2:16 it’s a language called gokturk... ancient Turkic. Says TURK Turk comes from the ancient Turkic word Toruk... which means Strength.. ie. to be Turkic means to be 💪.
They were in America too. You can find.that on old maps prior to 1500s. Mud floods proposes that alot of the buildings all over the America s were built by them.
Patrick Ong .....ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ....that's just stupid. They were nomads, that's true. But up until the late 1700's they lived in Yurts and small cities of low houses as described in the video. Apart from the city of Ulanbatan built in the late 1200's, then there's no evidence of any of them building massive multi story buildings with stone masonry and bricks. There is no evidence that these people built any ships either. It is possible they made it across the Bering Strait. But no evidence anywhere that they built anything substantial. Other than your imagined Mud Flood. Oh and there's no real evidence of any such thing as a Mud Flood.
@H D Again, the proof and evidence says other wise. There is always going to be multiple religions but the base one in Tartaria was Islam. History is always re-written. Any one that studies real history knows that Christianity as a whole has done more damage than all others combined but is not treated that way.
you are the only one in this comment fest of nonsense, that has spoken any truth the tartars were a great nation of traders, of knowledge building and and flight.... the resets have put us back and the people who utilized the tunnels have been able to come out and take over the uninhabited regions only occupied by the new natives and smaller peoples..... they have re engineered electrical efforts look up letter benjamin franklin to french baileys about scientific notation he said united fakers stole it all..... so much ppl dont know just look the world fairs or the lost califa palaces
The takeaway from this video is that it resulted from poor research. The Chinese didn't build a great wall; the great wall was built AGAINST invasion from China. Does that reversal reveal that we have lingering prejudices in our history?
@@imawildman Existing evidence and photos all show southern-oriented fortification with entries to the towers coming from the north of the Great Wall of China. The megalith builders were the Amurru that held the entire Amur River Drainage system and are considered in the Altai and Tarim Basin to be the critical race that brought agriculture and civilization. Navajo and Apache and the Dene/Athapaska group all have their Ket Gaelic language root from the Tarim Basin Giants. The Navajo say these giants "brought their own Mongolians" to settle North America. That makes the Chinese south of the Great Wall the Mongolians most likely in their view coz it's not the redheaded giants.
Tall, Red hair & blue Eyes???? I stooped watching after this. The narrator or whoever created this video just want to say that Europeans conquered China, Middle East & Eastern Europe.. but not Asians. What a load of bullshit. He's clearly Asians. The entire Siberia is filled with people with Asian features all the way to Alaska, Canada & Greenland.
My grany was a krimean Tatar, whos escaped to island of Symy in Greece.she and my mom had dark black hair and brown eyes threfore i dont belive Russian version of Gengis khan having red hair myth.
I have a few things to say: 1. I'm pretty sure tribals in Europe like the Germans and Celts were wearing pants long before those horse nomads rode in from the steppes. 2. What's the source for that Ghengis Khan description?
That' not true. Tatars were atacked Slavic tribes in Bulgaria . Tatars were tribes from desert Goby . We had recorded in Serbia from what territory they come from and theirs moove in Asia.
Actually ghengis khan came from an altaic tribe on the border of mongolia and Kazakhstan called the Boorjigin. Ghengis khan was a enemy to the mongolian tatars. At one point he almost wiped them out but was persuaded by one of his high rank commanders to show mercy upon them.
It's not "hidden", it is just two different words - Tatar is a nation (now a part of Russia) and Tartar is a sauce. There are other meanings to the second word, but essentially these are different things.
7:00 Tall red hair is commom among Asian Ethnic groups in Mongolia too. Such as Daughrs. Assuming he was a European looking man is not logical. Even though there were golden hair ethnic group, and literally white mixed people from Xiongnu empire period in Asia.
With Tatarian Empire reaching as far west as the Huns, It's safe to say that most of eastern Europe might be loosely considered Tatar homeland. Crimea I believe has always been one of the central focal points of the Tatar peoples.
They went more west than you may think (see Cristopher Columbus) Also in 1850-1900 they demolished thousands of giant rock buildings in US saying they were burnt by fire. Same story in all states all over America.
There never was a Tartarian Empire. Where are their history books? What did they invent? Where are their coins? There is no historical documents of any of the above. Fomenko is a fraud. For instance the Roman Empire which was worldwide had their own coins, their own art, books Etc.
I am also a tatar. From Pakistan multan. Me and my father and my grand father also have a Mongolian spot. I have on behind of my shoulder. My father on arm. And grandfather on back
Not mentioning evaporation of Tatar language and culture because of Russian expansionism, they became pretty much russian like people, and most tatars I know cannot speak their language.
Just like what China doing to Uygurs. They are not allowed to speak their language, practice their religion and know their history. All this is handful of people threatens and scares billions of Chinese. Just like in Russia, the way Tatars has been treated. Not much different between them. Shame.
Buten Tatarlarga biz Korea Tatarlar salam aytamuz. 안녕하세요. 타타르 민족 의 선조 나라 사람입니다. The ethnic origin of the Tatar began in ancient Korea and Manchuria. 1) They were recorded, for the first time in history, in the Orkhon Turkic Steles (Stone monument) built for Bilge Kagan and his younger brother Ko'l Tegin in 730~740s. 2) Later, recorded about them for the 1st time in book form. 3) Based on these records, the Tatars were originally Koguryeo-an (ancient Korean) people who fled to the Eastern Turk Kaghanate (modern day Mongolia, Tuva, and Hakkaz, Altai mountain areas) due to the collapse of Koguryeo in 668 AD as the result of the war between Tang--Silla allies v.s. Koguryeo Kingdom in 668AD. 4) The ethnic name of Tatar comes from ancient Korean word "Taedaero (Prime Minister vice cum Defense Minister of Koguryeo Kingdom)". No famous scholars of the West and East such as Baskakov, Yeremiyev, Budagov, Berezin, Fakiyev, Ahsen Batur… etc) could ever figure this out because they did not understand Korean language and history except for Hive Han Abulghazi Khan several hundred years ago (because he was on of the descendants of ancient Koreans). But you can read more details here in the book 고구려 발해인 칭기스 칸(Koguyreo-Barhae-an Ghenghiz Khan) written by 전원철 박사 who is me. pp. 182~247: search.naver.com/search.naver?where=nexearch&sm=top_sly.hst&fbm=0&acr=1&ie=utf8&query=%EC%A0%84%EC%9B%90%EC%B2%A0+%EB%B0%95%EC%82%AC They joined the Eastern Turkic Kaghanate and became the Son-in-law tribe of Buk Chor ( 𐰴𐰯𐰍𐰣 𐰴𐰍𐰣 Qapaγan) Qaγan, the father of Princess Acena and uncle of Ku'l Tegin and Bilge Kagan. 5) They lived there and partly Turkicized as time passed by. So, they became Turkic speaking people eventually, but they still preserve their ethnic name Khorai=Khongurai=Tadar. After 840, the Eastern Turkic Kaganate collapsed as the result of the Uighur upsurge and revolution against the Eastern Turkic Kagan, Ozmish. 6) As a result, some Tatar tribes ran away with the Turks towards the west via Siberia and some tribes joined the Uighur Kagan and made a new dynasty. The famous Ko Sanggun who escorted Uigur princess to Tang State was a Tatar Chieftain. 7) These Tatars later migrated to the modern day Tataristan and other parts of the world and they were localized with other Turkic and Slavic group of people and, ethnically, they also changed their appearances. On the 2nd link above, (www.worldatlas.com/articles/w.../ Who are the Tartar People? - WorldAtlas) it is wrongly said: " The name Tatar may have been coined in the 5th century by nomadic Mongolic-speakers in the Tatar confederation.", But this is not true. They were not "Mongolic-speakers", but Korean-speakers. Khorai means Korea and Kon-gurai (Kon-Khorai) means Ko-gureyo (Great-Korea). There are no such words like Khorai or Kongurai nor Tatar in Mongol vocabulary except that the Mongols adopted the word "Tatar" without knowing the meaning. However, Chinghiz (Ghenghiz) Khan, the Great Mongol leader, and the World Conqueror, shares the same blood line with the Ha-Khans of Tatar Kaganate because both of them are descendants of the Royal Family of Koguryeo Kingdom. So, Temujin Uge (and Kori Boka, Chieftains of the Tatars) who were (was) captured by Yesugay Baatar, the father of Chinghiz Khan, has the same personal name of Temujin, which is the name of the 3rd King of Kogureyo Kingdom (37 BC -668 AD), King Taemushin (Great Godly Martial King). Regarding the origin of Tatar Kingdom in Kazakhstan and Siberia around Irtish River, and how it is related to the ancient Koreans, you may read my articles here (1~3 from the top), using Google translator because my articles are written in Korean. (4~13 from the top, are related to the secrets in the origin of Chinghiz Khan etc.) jmagazine.joins.com/all/search?year_1=&month_1=&year_2=&month_2=&sourcecode=&prs_issue=&keyword=%EC%A0%84%EC%9B%90%EC%B2%A0 This magazine co. is the 2nd largest journalist company in Korea: jmagazine.joins.com/all/search?year_1=&month_1=&year_2=&month_2=&sourcecode=&prs_issue=&keyword=%EC%A0%84%EC%9B%90%EC%B2%A0 Yakshi gunlar bolsin. 안녕~~~!
No one conquered him, he died from an allergic reaction to a bee sting. They merged with the Persians who they conquered and kind of fazed out over time.
Pretty sure it was one of the Persian feudal houses/empires that created pants for riding horses. Off the top of head I would say perhaps during the rule of the Sasanians.
That depiction came from some persian script that was written somewhere in the middle of 14 century in place somewhere in modern day turk. Almost 200 years after his death. How accurate do you think it is. By the way Turkis khaganate are not the modern day turks. There is a saying: Turkis father and Persian mother makes Turkmen. Turkmen father and Greek mother makes Turks.
We know that Atilla wasn't poisoned by his wife, he died of a burst ulcer which developed from his VERY well documented drinking habits. On top of that the wife spent the entire night cuddling the dead body to prove she didn't kill him so give her some slack
They are not tatars.Tatars is just a tribe of mongols.They are Kipchak Turks,tatar name stuck on them since Golden Horde,the founder was Tatar(mongol)they got assimilated real fast,they dont speak mongol they speak turkic.2 totally different languages not even numbers and love words are similar.They should change the name to Kipchakistan but no one cares i think.
There was a ice bridge between Kamchatka and Alaska 15000 years ago so it makes sense they still use some words still.But native americans are considered a separate race today on its own apart from caucosoid,mongoloid,negroid.All humans are related for that matter.But i don't see relevance between my original comment.
I am Mongolian. Can confirm. Tatar used to be an ancient Mongol clan then traveled to Southern Russia with Jochi's horde which later became the "Golden Horde", after they arrived they became assimilated with the numerous local Turkic tribes and Tatar clan became Turkified. Modern Tatars have very little Mongol genes
Some good info on the video. However there weren’t any portraits of Genghis Khan available even during his life time. It was forbidden to create his portraits. All of the current available portraits of Genghis today are all assumptions. Nobody knows what he really looked like. For a man of his statue he suddenly had a lot of enemies. Therefore, it’s understandable that he doesn’t want anyone to recognize him. It’s entirely possible that he could look Caucasus given they were around the Eurasia vicinity. But I highly doubt it. His origin was 100% mongol.
These images show Scythian and Alans not Mongols and Tatars. Look at their garments. Unfortunately this clip is very misleading that being informative.
Malivamar Romans’ were wearing skirts n robes. The huns were the first to wear pants. These Steppe people were the first to domesticated horses n ride them. Can’t ride horse wearing yo skirts lmao
He's being sarcastic, but also telling the truth. The dark ages were a time when the European civilization went backwards in development and philosophy
THE TRUE ҺISTORY OF TATARS: Perhaps you know, that an outstanding Tatar historian-scientist D. Iskhakov wrote: “the true history of Tatars, of the people in every respect historical, is not written yet”. However, recently were published books about the unwritten (hidden) real history of Tatars, written by independent Tatar Historian Galy Yenikeyev. His books presents a new, or rather "well-forgotten old" information about the true history of the Tatars and other Turkic peoples. It must be said, that in official history there are many pro-Chinese and Persian falsifications about the "tatars - wild nomads" etc. Therefore, primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names "Mongol" and "Tatar" (“Tartar") in the medieval Eurasia: the name "Mongol" until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While “the name "Tatar" was “the name of the native ethnos (nation) of Genghis Khan …” , “…Genghis Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the "Mongolian”…" (Russian academic-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This is also confirmed by many other little known facts. So in fact Genghis Khan was a Tatar and a great leader of the all Turkic peoples. But with time many of his descendants and tribesmen became spiritually disabled and forgot him and his invaluable doctrine and covenants... Tatars of Genghis Khan -medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among the Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others. And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite the politicians of the tsars Romanovs and Bolsheviks dictators had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations... About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, which was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book "Forgotten Heritage of Tatars" (by Galy Yenikeyev). There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English and Russian languages) you can easily find in the Internet, on Smashwords company website: www.smashwords.com/profile/view/MIG17 On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Genghis Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source «About the clan of Genghis-Khan» its author gives the words of the mother of Genghis-Khan: «My son Genghis looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse» [34, p. 14]. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar story. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Genghis-Khan...".
Rais Karauchy tatar not tartar, but the name of tartar from latin language the mean's " the evils from the hell " this name just for mongol warriors ( specially not globally ). And the tatars were turkic people ( the turks ) and one of turkic and tribes, the tatars not mongol but were turkic people ( the nomadic turks ).
Fauzi Bin Bakht you are Wrong!!! Ta is means Persian/Stranger/Enemy in Turkic language. Tat is means Persians/Strangers/Enemies. But this word using for Persians(Especially). Ar/Er/İr means the man/human. Tatar is means Strangers. Another example Tacik/Tajik. This word is means little Persians. Or Talısh. This words is means Iranians. Or Tatık. This word is means Persianicized Turk. This terms are Turkic.
Tatars are Bulgarian, like Oyghurs, Chuvash, Bashkir, Balkar, Chechen, Ingush etc. Where the pan-turkic theory fails is that Chechen, Ingush and Balkars have practically the same culture, while Chechen, Ingush, Dagestani are not turkic-speaking. The common denominator is Bulgaria. Bulgarians have been speaking Bulgar (now called a Turkic language) long before people on the east of Turan Yorta started calling themselves Turk. Turkic like Slavic is not ethnic group, it's a language group. There is no Turkic ethnicity. Turan Yorta (AKA Turkic Khaganate) was formed by Bulgars, Avars and Khazars. People of the east of Turan Yorta started calling themselves Turk in the 6th century. The culture and traditions are Bulgar.
Yeh they did not really offer any protection at all... During the tatar yoke multiple cities such as Kiev, the ancient capital of Rus' were simply razed and the khans did not ever protect Rus' against anything and even often raided it for extra money. An example that proves that the point of protection is the war with the Livonian Order where Tatar vassal Novgorod fought without any support from the tatars.
This is a terrible video. It's jumbled, gabbled, rushed, goes all over the place, does not make connections clear, introduces things too briefly for them to be understood, is full of mispronunciations and outright falsehoods, and the background music is generally incongruous. I could honestly do a more informative video just reading out the Wikipedia page.
@NeoTurkism Complete ad hominem! And from someone whose username indicates they have an ethnic political bias. If you wish to improve the standing of Turkic peoples you should want good quality videos on them, not defend bad quality ones just because they are about them.
I think the guy who gave sound to this video was in a hurry to go shopping with his wife, she may have threatened him, and he has to catch the bus which will arrive in two minutes....
As far as I understood the narrator insists that Genghis Khan looked like Mel Gibson in Braveheart. Has this guy ever visited Central Asia, Kazakhstan or Russia east from Ural Mountains? The lands of nomadic ancestry? I doubt so. There are a few blonde, red and most commonly brown haired mongoloids with blue, grey and green eyes. I've met a small amount of blonde mongoloids with blue eyes. Most recently it was an old man with blue eyes (not sure about his hair colour as I mentioned he was old and almost bald). It so happened that we had a small conversation using two languages one of which was of turcic family. We both looked a little bit uncommon for our ethnicity. I used to have curly and red ish hair when I was kid (looked a bit tatar ish people would say). They just got darker when I grew up. European you say? Don't be so ridiculous. There are plenty of people there who can make you feel confused. I know a case when an acquaintance of mine a red haired englishman was taken for chinese in China. He was told that there are actually red haired chinese in North China. The guy looked very european (or very russian to me). And don't forget to refer to a cultural difference. Chinese most likely call red hair everyone whose hair is lighter than coal black. Asians, europeans...have you ever heard term eurasians? Cross-culture or intersections of civilization? Those terms are incredibly ancient. Those terms well describe nomads of the steppes and give a good hint about who the hack was Chingis Khan.
It doesnt matter what you think. Red hair peoples dominated EVERY culture. The ancient GIANTS were red haired blue eyed.They controlled the earth LONG BEFORE modern man.
Some Europeans are arrogant. They cannot suffer from the fact that Europe were once conquered by Asian Mongoloid. They can only accept Asian white skinned Caucasoid invaded them, but in no way the yellowish Mongoloid. Genghis Khan family were erotic so they have had so many offspring of hundred thousand left behind. Genghis Khan family was originated in inner Mongol where was more Chinese influence than European influence. These lead to the conclusion when looking at the faces of current Mongolian people, of that their ancestor Genghis Khan was most likely not European look. The red hair blue eyes are the decedents of Huns, the European invaders, ruling and enslaving Kazakh and Mongol by that time. Han Chinese called them Xiongnu after they mixing blood with Tatar and Mongol. Actually they were Slav or Turk or Arab or Jew in origin as migrated foreign, but not Tatar or Mongol. Both pure-blooded Tatar and Mongol are Mongoloid Asian with Chinese look. Siberia Yakut Ladies (75% of Tatar, 10% of Mongol and 5% Eskimo) ua-cam.com/video/PaAnIAbWfDw/v-deo.html Siberia Evenki people (60% of Mongol and 35 of Tatar) ua-cam.com/video/CZpJAJDGNPQ/v-deo.html False Tatar - Crimean Tatar (30% Slav, 28% Tatar, 17% Jew/Turk/Arab, 8% Mongol, 2% Han). Actually they are modern Xiongnu. ua-cam.com/video/Obv_tZzUA8s/v-deo.html
‘Interesting’, thanks. But not just the video: Here they tried to briefly retell the content (or rather the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikeiv. That is they conceal where the information was taken from. But it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - the authors of the video, apparently, did not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, beeng afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’. But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video, however, this portrait is showing both before and after. This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources. This portait was used by authorths of this video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC That is, all of this is called plagiarism - that is, theft - among the decent people. According to the content of this video must be said the following: ideologists of different times have invented a lot to hide in the darkness the history of ‘the own nation of Chingiz Khan, whose name and self-name was no other as 'Tatars’, and this people never spoke 'the language that we now call 'Mongolian'... ‘ (Russian academician orientalist V. Vasiliev, 19th century) - see more about the real History of Tatars in the books of the independent historian G. R. Yenikeiev. Official history hides the fact that in the past existed the nation of medieval Tatars that were the ancestors not only of those who still ‘preserved this proud name - Tatars’ (L. N. Gumilev), but also of many representatives of modern Turkic peoples and a significant part of the modern Russian people. Precisely in order to ‘ divide and rule’ over them. About all of this and much more from the hidden history of the Tatars and Eurasia reasonably and argumentatively has written in the books of the independent historian G. R. Yenikeiev. But nothing about stated above is not said in this video, that is, it is “not a brief history of the Tatars”, but haphazardly sketched out some ‘grains of the history of the Tatars’
so according to this the Mongols and Tatars are the same people? also it should be noted that while the Yassa is mentioned there is no proof it existed. Wikipedia notes;” the Yassa or law was a secret written code of law. it was never made public. The absence of any physical document is historically problematic. Historians are left with secondary sources, conjecture and speculation, which describes much of the content of this overview. Historical certainty about the Yassa is weak compared to the much older Code of Hammurabi 18th century BCE or the Edicts of Ashoka, 3rd century BCE. “ so we don’t even know that it existed much less some legal system was ever set up to preside over the law. the Romans were tolerant of religions for the most part as were many empires throughout history. i don’t understand why people act as if the Mongols were the only group that allowed such a thing.
the invasion of the Turks to the West is shown as good, but the invasion of the West to the Horde is shown as bad. Why? Of course, the Russians did not like it when young Tatar and Nogai dzhigits robbed them with kalym for their brides, when they were sold into slavery in the largest slave market in the Crimean khanate.
Amazing video!! But I feel much is lost of the true history of the people. Wasn't there an accusation during the early years after WW2 that the Soviets were trying to eliminate Tatar history and culture? I recall a US CIA memo regarding that topic around 1960 I believe. Great video of a great Historical people!
You are referring to crimean tatars, and in the video they speak mostly about volga tatars (or Kazan tatars).
It's not just an accusation. It's truth. The CIA website has documents that refer to the Tartaria Revisionist Committee
Yeah you’re correct. I’ve seen a document saying that The bolsheviks got rid of and also changed grand Tartary’s history to Russia’s.
The colossal empire of Tartaria was wiped out so fast that their advanced technologies are exposed - since they don't want the public to know about their technologies, we are lied to about the timeline for our Earth - since old documents that tell us the WHEN and HOW and WHY for our entire timeline, the fraud is exposed.
@@WhirledPublishing the CIA document right? Or have you seen other evidence?
I learned I had tatar blood in my early 20's when my son was born with a birth mark, the " mongolian spot". I was so scared and worried and couldnt sleep until pediatrician explained. At first I didnt get it and when I told my parents my father said laughing " your mother's grandmother was tatar"! And that is how I learned a family secret, something they never talked about. I was born in 🇷🇴. Since I found the truth I realized some physical and personality traits our family shares. They say tatars never give up when they set a goal, that they are not easily influenced by others, hard working, self determined and intelligent. My grandfather was the best man I ever knew, a true family man, a business man, a respected man in his town. I always knew he had something different but I didn't know what. I think we don't give genes enough importance bc we can't control nature but they have a big influence on who we are.
My son was born with a Mongolian spot but it disappeared after a few months. Is that usual?
@@loughton57 Yes, a mongolian spot is a concentration of skin pigment and it always goes away.
@Erqĭn Məmbetjanuli 🇰🇿 Q̆iyat The Tatars have no spots. You're just Mongol.
Im 1/4 tatar from Kazakstan. Never heard of spots but everything else sounds right))
@@loughton57 Yes.
IT IS NOT Tartar IT IS TATAR
Tatters
Naim Kudeki no Bulgars
Naim Kudeki 👐🏻
@janis vogel При встрече с настоящим татаром ты поймешь, что соусом будешь сам.
potartar, potater. ha its just like potatoe, potato?
Сәлам татарлар кем бу комментарий укый. Сез әйбәт беләсез, безнең тарихы бик бай, һәм аны сакларга кирәк.
Әйе, бик "саклаганнар" күрсәтергә дә курканнар шул, мескеннәр... Гали Еникәй агайның китапларын укы, чын тарихны беләсең килсә: tartareurasia.ucoz.com/publ/gde_mozhno_priobresti_knigi_gr_enikeeva/4
salam Azerbaycanli bu yorumu oxudu. Salam bütün Tatarlara
Selam ben Germanya'da doğan Türk. Senin yazdığının Latin harfleri ile buraya aktarıyorum:
Selam Tatarlar, kem bu kommentariy ukıy. Sez elbet belesez, bezneng tarihı bik bay, hem anı saklarga kirek.
Türkiye'de onu böyle söyleriz: Selam Tatarlar, kim bu yorumu (kommentarı) okuyor. Siz elbet bilirsiniz, bizim tarih pek zengin (bay), ve (hem) onu saklamak (muhafaza etmek) gerek.
При чем тут монголы или Китай с буддистами смешали😅😂
True, In a video, the Ancient Relics of America, I found out the USA was settled by Danes, Welsh, Norwegian, Scandinavians, from 400AD on . But then in 1200 AD the Tartarians from the North (Canada) came down and wiped them all out! I assume they were the hordes of Genghis Khan! Why was this hidden from us.
Ok. I looked for information on how the Genghis Khan looked like. He was not red headed - he had reddish skin, like from wind and sun; he also didn’t have blue eyes, he was described as cat eyed, and in other description that he had light eyes which was referencing to him having heavenly ancestry - both descriptions are a simple mistranslation to 2 different languages in which the same description are used for different things. He looked like anyone in north parts of Asia adapted to conditions of the region. I don’t know about the rest of the video because those information suggested by the title is something I try to learn at the moment.
Definitely the cleaned up oversimplified version of these histories. Is this a PBS publication?
No this is real history. Not the made up stuff you’ll find by random people on the internet
National Geographic lol.
You're too polite. It's not even suitable for PBS.
I voiced the English narration here - I now have finally seen the video. I think you have done a wonderful job, and thank you for the chance to work together with you on this video. ~Val Anderson
sir, you made so many mistakes when pronouncing such words as Tatar, khaganate, Genghis khan... it's not /tartar/, but /tatar/, not /kәgаgәnәt/ as you say it but /kagәnәt/, and not /geŋgis/ but /dʒeŋgis/ khan...
@@BulatShaymi dude did a good job stop watching videos and just read if the way pronouncing words gets yo panties in a bunch
@@BulatShaymithat was bugging me too. Whoever hired him to narrate should have educated him on the appropriate pronunciations.
I thought it was AI
@@BulatShaymi I don't doubt it! I was instructed by the folks who wrote it, I did the best I could. ~V~
As a Greek I find the history and culture of the various turkic people's very interesting. Even though today Turkey and Greece consider each other enemies, I think a step to making better relations is by educating one another on the history of our diverse people
wake up Vlaka
you are Delusional , The Turks have been Invading Greek Lands and killing Greeks to enslavement them for 1000 years . Why dont you wake up and grow up
You are very brain washed , Greeks have been at war with the Turks for the last 1000 years
Tatars are a vastly different than Oghuz Turk like the ones in modern Turkey. Kipchak Turks who didn’t leave their ancestral lands. An offshoot did however go to modern day Bulgaria and established a union with the Slavs of that region.
@@mickeymouse1697 no racism i hope peace
"everyone knows about the tartars" it said 😂 as if they have not been hiding most knowledge about it all this time!
i dont mean to be so offtopic but does anybody know of a way to log back into an Instagram account?
I somehow forgot my password. I love any help you can give me
@Paul Cullen instablaster :)
@Keagan Dylan I really appreciate your reply. I found the site through google and I'm in the hacking process now.
I see it takes quite some time so I will reply here later with my results.
@Keagan Dylan it did the trick and I now got access to my account again. Im so happy!
Thanks so much, you saved my ass !
@Paul Cullen glad I could help xD
I'm trying to learn about tartaria bc I am a tartar from Uzbekistan and I have no information on tartare at all. Does anyone know anything more or have any theories?
Do you have twitter or Instagram?
ua-cam.com/video/e_DxZVV8Eiw/v-deo.html
This guy is rediculous! Horse,cattle husbandry was introduced by the ANCIENT SCYTHIANS NOT THE HUNS!! The vast majority of the asian step was Scythian tribes(white people) who in migrations filtered into Germania and scandinavia.PEOPLES WHO WORE PANTS AS FAR BACK IN HISTORY AS THEY CAN FIND. Horse masters the Getae, scythae,Ari, Alan's and Masegatae and many many more were indo european. And constantly refered to in ancient writings from china to middle east to Greece as tall heavily bearded warriors blonde,red hair with blue or grey eyes. Some of the first written mentions from china describe chinese cheiftens sending emissaries to Scythia to trade for their wonderful bigger faster horses...
This presentation is a frustrating, progressive, politically motivated falsity and is easily discounted by anyone with brains enough to look into it!
Huns were Skits and they were White Race, not the stupid description made by modern scholars. And yes this is a stupid history!!!
"European fashion of wearing trousers came from the huns"
Celts, germanics, even the Otzi man: Am I a joke to you?
and I stop at Attila's wife poisoning him...nobody knows if she did or didn't and most agree he wasn't poisoned and died from a nosebleed. There's a lot of misinformation on this documentary.
Dude; the pre-celts, the picts and celts in the highlands and lowlands of Britain were wearing trousers as well as kilts as early as 40bc according to Roman historians.
what did they call themselves?@Mister Physics
Remember celts were all over Europe spanning all the way to turkey but Romans got the best of ancient Gauls. I’m sure the huns were running rampant all over wearing their pants on horse back at that time.
@Mister Physics celts is a thing and most likely not native of the isle
Celtics were led by the great Larry Bird..
Yeah but I believe there are records of steppe tribes having pants in pre-history
Great video,,very proud of my Tatar heritage and of the greater Turkish people’s of the world ...Ne mutlu turkum diyene ,,
Why are the towers on the wrong/opposing side of the wall?
The anti Iranian media and western propaganda is so strong these days but that shouldn't stop people from learning the facts.
Scythians (Ancient Iranian nomads) are known to be the inventors of saddles ,stirrups and pants and horn bows ,there are evidance that these been of scythian lifestyle for at least a 1000 years before the huns .the Huns adopted these from scythians, alot later than the time as the persians did. All this entered Europe arround 500 A.D
6:42 this is Sasanian architecture and you can see many examples of them in Iran and other persian lands:
Sarvestan palace
Jabalie palace
Ghoghnos mosque
Everyone should have a well undrestanding that alot of eastern Europe and Asian cultures adopted the ancient Iranian cultures and lifestyles since we clearly see that this was what they preference.
Some belive the tatars ,while you shouldn't know that tatars themselves adopted these from Scythians. There are archeology sources, greece sources, persian and islamic sources and paintings, and scythian jewelry and art described that scythians.
The description of Turks in middle east is like that:
Turks/tatars are horde people who move from land to land and pick what they find usefull or well designed, they have had nothing of their own.
thats what they did for the past 2000 years. The tatars both in clothing and lifestyle and art were very similar to scythians although being from different origins and different backgrounds.
Scytihan iranian on your dream look at the map never make again great İran like turks dont make ottoman again.
Sythians were Northern Europians. Finnish, Swedes etc. Took thousand years to come to Caucasus, then blended with the people in the area.
Genghis Khan didn't have red hair or blue eyes, he clearly had typical Mongoloid features depicted in portraits painted under supervision of his grandson khublai.
He talked about Attila who was also a mongoloid.
It's been said that he was a Scotsman
You're all wrong, he was actually a black Turk from Albania.
LoL
In most paintings he has red beard and dark eyes
Genghis Khan was not a Tatar, the Chinese just called him a Tatar because that's what they called all Mongols.
mongolia was unknown 100-200 years ago because it did not exist
@@ercanbando9395 he is not european he is asian mongolic
Ghenghis Khan had red hair and blue eyes
@@sulkoma I've heard that before, it's also false.
And it's impossible that he had blue eyes.
The only primary source giving a physical description of the Khan describes him as an "imposing man" with gray eyes.
@@snakey934Snakeybakey hows it false? & Hows it impossible? Theres plenty of mongolians with red hair & even blue or green eyes, howd that happen?
what about tartaria?
Did he just say ghengis kan was a blue eyed ginger. I am so done
He was. See the reality. See the older images.
My direct paternal ancestor was a Crimean Tatar Boyar - Mordko Kubrat Naryshko - and his son fell (was killed) at the Siege of Kazan in 1550, he was fighting in Ivan the Great's army. Mordko Kubrat Naryshko is also the direct ancestor of Natalia Kirillovna Romanova, née Naryshkina, the mother of Peter the Great.
Mordko Kubrat Naryshko (the latter name being a nickname) was born sometime in the 1400s. He was a Tatar Boyar from Crimea, whence he left to go to Muscovy in 1462-63, and was a courtier at the court of Ivan III (1476). According to another version, he was captured by the Lithuanian prince Vytautas en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vytautas_the_Great among the Crimean Karaites, and arrived in Moscow as a bodyguard of Queen Sophia of Lithuania en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophia_of_Halshany.
However, the patronym Kubrat goes much further back.
Excerpt:
"Long before the Mongols, the Eurasian steppe was dominated by another great Turkic empire, the Proto-Bulgars, whose state was centered around the Sea of Azov (modern Russia and Ukraine). Known to be equally as skilled in nation building as in warfare, they built massive stone citadels wherever they set foot. Under the legendary Khan Kubrat, the Proto-Bulgar empire came to cover much of the Black Sea Coast."
Source: www.rbth.com/travel/328983-bolgar-russia-mysterious-muslim-city
So now what is your nationality?
@@abduvohidodiljonov9365 British and Swiss.
Chinggis Khaan wasn't from Black Tatars. He was Borjigin of Mongol. Mongols and Tatars had long time vengeance to each other. Chinggis khaan finally crushed Tatar with alience of Jin dynasty. And after that he executed all Tatar men who are taller than a wheel of the carriage. There is no way Chinggis Khaan had red hair and blue eyes. If he had, so then why all his sons, grandsons, grand grandson's portraits have black hairs, brown eyes, and central Asian faces.
baagii baagii
!!! Don't be so sure of yourself. This guy's name is OGEDEI! GENGHİS KHAN son !You see, he looks like his father. So red hair and blue eyes 😉
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/YuanEmperorAlbumOgedeiPortrait.jpg
He was trolling. 😁
Ogedei Khan had red hair and green eyes and he was son of cengiz khan
I usually do not comment on youtube......but regarding this clip I think the author has made a serios error......i'm pretty sure that Genghis Han ruled the Mongol Empire and not the Golden Horde...the Golden Horde formed after the death of Genghis Han.....also the author paints the soviets in a good light whithout mentioning their grave crimes......the execution of the President of the shortlived Crimean Peoples Republic (arguably the first muslim democratic republic)Noman Çelebicihan and chopping his body and throwing the body parts into the sea.......also the genocide commited after the ww2 in the form of Stalin's massive deportations to Central Asia and Siberia.......and related to Tatarstan there was the orchestrated great famine of 1921-1922.....that specifically targeted the volga tatars.....some figures show as many 2million deaths......also there is the 1932-33 famine that is still debated if it was orchestrated or not because of it's scope.........in conclusion do not praise the soviets.......they are at the same level as Ivan the Terrible......for tatars only Death and Miserry came from the hands of the soviets
he did have red hair tho
A tatar cavalry regiment was hired by Charles X Gustav of Sweden and after the peace with Denmark1658 the soldiers were dispersed to the farmers in the conquerred province of Bohuslän north of Gothenburg. After a few years the farmers were in uproar because of the many problems which was caused and the regiment was sent back to Tatarstan but it seems as if some of the population were related to them and the town of Uddevalla was called Tatarstan after that and people could be called tattar devils if they annoyed the population after that even if they were not related to them. But I can say I thought there were too many mean types in that city as I recall!
Sergey Rachmaninov was a great composer of Tatar heritage. Is there any Russian who does not have Tatar blood, and why do so many Tatars look Scandinavian, like violinist Alina Ibragimova with her blond hair and blue eyes. Furthermore, Tataria is in Europe.
That's because modern Tatars was mixed with Russians. And Alina is not Tatar, she is half russian half bashkir
Tatar country was in eastern mongolia first. Tatars in europe only begin after the mongol invasions.
That's because Tatars are also mixed with Finno-Ugranians
@@amann9963 Not every Tatar is mixed with a russian lol. I know a lot of pure Tatars without russian blood that have blonde or red hair and blue eyes. They inhereted it from Finno-Ugranians
ua-cam.com/video/e_DxZVV8Eiw/v-deo.html
terribly misleading video. oh and nothing was happening in Europe you say? wtf
Guess he was us to believe they all were like Rip Van Winkle.
History is the lie told by the winners
@@discodirk48 But this is Tatar history told by the Tatars, haven't you seen who made and uploaded this? And according to your nonsense they lost their global empire...so your bs conspiracy theory falls apart.
Black Tatar is a Chinese classification for steppe people based on their levrl of Sinicization. NOT an ethnic classification.
There were 3 classes of Sinicization.
White Tatar Sinicized
Black Tatar somewhere in the middle
Raw Tatar basically barbarians.
Chingis was a Mongol. Not a Tatar. And according to Plano Carpini, they didn't particularly like being called Tatars.
It's just a historical quirk that this name was given to them in the West.
@Sercan Şimşek The name MONGOL is originated from the phrase "Monkh(tengeriin)Gal" which means "Eternal Flame of sky". Later it became "MonkhGal". In Mongolian traditional script, "Monggol" and "MonkhGal" are written same but pronounced different. Even in old Mongolian flag, you can see "Sun, Moon, Flame in blue sky". Hundred years before Chinggis khaan, there was Khamag Mongol(Whole Mongol) led by Khabul Khan. the name Mongol was mentioned in Kitans books in 11th century. So how the hell this name is Turkish and Human's name? Do you have any proof?
Not in the West ...tthe Göktürk script tells us about tatars...it is very old
I wonder if the Jewish world or father as TATY (TATI in European language) has anything to do with the TATA or TATA(RS) as a father (as it said the great Kahn was called as well... due to that the he took a lots of Jewish with him and they settled later all over in Europe as they been taken too. i wonder if the two world is associated.
After the KAHN the Turkish sultan also ruled over these people and now is mix and half Islam?
"nothing was going on in europe "
ok. i heard enough !
theklrdude oo, You must be right as it was known as the "dark ages" of Europe although I doubt the existence of Europe then as we know it today.
at 1:41 :
"the european fashion of wearing trousers, came from the huns"
was when I stopped, but already cringed hard after hearing about the alleged boring pan-european situation during that time
Weird, he said that right after mentioning several notable things that happened in Europe.
Thank you for pointing that out, everything that's said in this is insane
i believe he was being sarcastic!!
In addition, runic is not ancient Turkic language. It is not invented by Turkic. Runic is a Northern European Germanic script. The same runic stones monuments are commonly found in Northern Europe.
The huns with Atila was also in Danmark. We have places named after them. Hundested, Hundige, Hundsvig. It is also mentioned in the sagas. The word Russ came from slavic tribes calling the vikings russ, the vikings put together Rusland/russia and rulled over the slavic tribes.
@@mr.purple1779 read this:
SH. MARJANI INSTITUTE OF HISTORY OF THE TATARSTAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD
THE GOLDEN HORDE IN W ORLD H ISTORY
Kazan 2017
Foreword Rafael Khakimov Full-scale research on the Ulus of Jochi (the Golden Horde) did not begin until as recently as the 1990s, when ideological restrictions imposed by the government were finally lifted. This primarily concerned the Resolution on the State and Measures for Improving Political and Ideological Awareness Raising in the Tatar Party Organization by the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), dated 1944, which prohibited studies on the history of the Golden Horde and Tatar khanates, as well as any popularisation of the epic ‘Edigu’. The Falsification of Tatar history was remarkably crucial to the success of Soviet policy. It was during the height of the WWII, with all of the country's resources already tied up, and long before the conquest of Berlin that the government found it necessary to prohibit research on the Golden Horde. Stalin believed Tatar history to be as important as achieving victories on the front. This ideology was designed to confine Tatar history to covering local events in the Volga Region and presenting the Tatars as descending from the Volga Bulgars, known for their heroic resistance to the Tatar-Mongol invasion. But at the same time, Tatars also acquired a negative image as Asians who had interrupted the natural course of Russian history. These doctrines was powerful enough to give rise to a Bulgarist political movement to rename Tatars to Bulgars and Tatarstan to Volga Bulgaria. The most zealous of its advocates wanted passports stating ‘Bulgar’ instead of ‘Tatar’ as their nationality, and would also register as Bulgars, not Tatars, during censuses. Ultimately, it was Perestroika that brought about a decline in Bulgarist activities, and nowadays the movement is seen as a rather exotic rudiment of the Soviet era when historical myths ran rampant. The turbulent political events of the 1990s stirred up the public, causing a surge in Tatar self-awareness, and Perestroika lifted the restrictions on research regarding the Golden Horde and Tatar khanates. This signaled the end of governmental ideological control. Academic institutions independent of the Russian Academy of Sciences were thus established in Tatarstan, while the Russian academic community endured the time of turbulence without any real interest towards Tatar history. Moreover, a number of Russian historians advocated for an unbiased approach to the Golden Horde. After state sovereignty of Tatarstan was declared in 1990, followed by the bilateral agreement on the division of powers between Kazan and Moscow in 1994, Tatarstan enjoyed an economic and cultural upswing. Borders were opened, international connections to academic centres were consolidated, and now that the republic was engaged in extensive foreign relations, self-consciousness of Tatars and Tatarstan's inhabitants was growing stronger every day. Tatars wanted an unbiased history for themselves, as textbooks and periodicals continued to be printed with barbaric images of their people, still presenting the Golden Horde as a source of savagery, humiliation to the Russians and a threat to Europe as a whole. A number of Russian politicians even tried to promote the Battle of Kulikovo to the status of a Russian national holiday, which was promptly prevented by Tatarstan's government. It was under these circumstances that large-scale research began on the Golden Horde, the first major milestone of which was The International Scientific Seminar titled ‘Source Studies on the History of the Ulus of Jochi (the Golden Horde). From Kalka to Astrakhan. 1223-1556’ on June 23-26, 1998. [3]. In later years it was followed by a series of conferences that eventually transformed into the ‘Golden Horde Forum’, a regularly held conference. The varied and diverse approaches to issues related to the Golden Horde ultimately yielded the dedicated volume titled ‘The Ulus of Jochi (Golden Horde). 13th Century-Mid-
dokumen.pub/the-golden-horde-in-world-history.html
Brief history of suvar-bulgars
Ювенальев Ю. Ю., ЮвенальеЮвенальев Ю. Ю., Ювенальев С. Ю. Культура суваро-булгар. Этническая религия и мифологические представления. - Чебоксары, 2013. - 128 с., илл.
The off-springs of the ancient Suvar-Bulgars - the modern Chuvash people are the fifth most populous nation in Russia. They live mostly in the Volga Region, where their first in the Eastern Europe middle aged state Volga Bulgaria was situated. To be more exact, it is the territory of modern Samara Oblast, Ulyanovsk Oblast, the Chuvash Republic and some parts of the territories of the Mari El Republic, the Udmurt Republic, the Republic of Bashkortostan and Penza Oblast.
This Part of the Volga Region bounds on the territory, where Finno-Ugric peoples the Mari and the Mordvins live on one side, and on the territory of the Turkic people Tatars and the Slavic people on the other side. According to genetic and linguistic data the culture of the Chuvash (the Suvar-Bulgars) stands apart. Thus it differs as from the culture of the Slavic people and from the culture of Finno-Ugric and Turkic peoples as well.
The names of the peoples, living in the Volga Region are well-known from the earliest times. But as far as the word ‘Chuvash’ is concerned, it appears in the written sources only since the 16th century.
xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars
@@gorurtartar7947 The Volga Tatars have very little in common with the Kipchak Tatars of the golden horde. Tatars are mainly Europo-Eurasian people. If you are a Mongol, who were also called Tatars, then just stop imposing on us relatives. And back off.
Mitogenomic data indicate admixture components of Asian Hun and Srubnaya origin in the Hungarian Conquerors January 2018
"Our results show that the Conquerors assembled from various nomadic groups of the Eurasian steppe. Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. Phylogenetic results reveal that more than one third of the Conqueror maternal lineages were derived from Central-Inner Asia and their most probable ultimate sources were the Asian Scythians and Asian Huns, giving support to the Hungarian Hun tradition. The rest of the lineages most likely originated from the Bronze Age Potapovka-Poltavka-Srubnaya cultures of the Pontic-Caspian steppe."
"Our data testify closest genetic relation to this modern population. Volga Tatars incorporate three main ethnic components [53]; the Volga Bulgars, which arrived in the 8th century, and intermingled with local Scythian and Finno-Ugric populations, then in the 13th century Kipchak Tatars of the Golden Horde brought a final Central-Inner Asian genetic layer and their language to the region. MITOMIX seems to identify these historical components, as Finno-Ugric Mansis and Khantys (Yug) comprise a major component of Volga Tatars besides Russians, while Scythians also appear among their potential sources (S5F Table). Our remarkable result is that the Conquerors seem to provide a predominant (26-41%) component of Volga Tatars (S5F Table), while the opposite value is significantly lower (9-26%; S5A Table). This asymmetry is due to the absence of some Tatar components, like Finno-Ugric ones, from the Conquerors. Thus our data indicate that rather Volga Tatars harbor a “Conqueror like” genetic component than the opposite, which may be linked historically to the Volga Bulgars."
@@mr.purple1779 stop lying!
"ittle in common with the Kipchak "-because Tatars killed many Kipchaks
Роджер Бэкон, знавший положение дел на территории Монгольской империи как из отчетов путешественников, так и из личных бесед с Рубруком, записал следующее: «И эта земля вся принадлежала куманам, которые назывались каптаки; но тартары совершенно разорили ее и перебили куманов, кроме части их, бежавших в Венгерское королев-ство и ставших его данниками»; «аланов же не существует, ибо тартары вторглись в эту землю и вынудили куманов бежать до самой Венгрии; а куманы - язычники, и такими же были аланы, но они истреблены»; «тартары же населяют землю аланов и куманов от Дуная и далее, почти до самых отдаленных областей востока»; «и в этой земле (между Та-наисом и Этилией. - В.К.) жили куманы, но тартары всех уничтожили, как и с другой стороны Танаиса, до самого Дуная, как говорилось»; «а вся эта земля тартарская от Танаиса до самой Этилии принадлежала куманам, которые назывались канглами, [но] они все были истреблены тартарами»; «далее, за Этилией, находится третье тартарское княже-ство; и ими уничтожены местные народы, а жили там куманы-канглы, как выше [говорилось]»; «Кумания была величайшей из земель. Ведь куманы обитали от Дуная до той самой земли, в которой пребывает император, и все они перебиты тартарами, кроме тех, которые бежали в Венгерское королевство» [Матузова, 1979, с. 212, 213, 215].
vostlit.info/Texts/rus15/Bacon_Roger/text1.phtml
Император Фридрих II: «И вот, убивая и грабя... упомянутые татары пришли в обильно насе-ленную местность куманов. И так как они не щадят своей жизни… [то] они наголову разбили [куманов]. А тех, кого не спасло бегство, сразил их кровавый меч»
Генрих Распе: «Даже команы, люди воинственные, не смогли в земле своей выстоять против них, но двадцать тысяч команов бежали к христианам; и готовы они сражаться против каждого народа, кроме вышеупомянутого [т.е. татар]»
После этого они ушли в сторону кипчаков, наиболее многочисленных из тюрок, убили всех, кого только они встретили, а остальные бежали в леса и вершины гор, покинув свою страну, которой овладели татары. Все это было совершено ими в самое короткое время, так сказать, походом, и только!
Ибн аль Асир.
An interesting fact, by the way, the Kipchaks were brothers to the medieval Tatars (our ancestors)
Ибн аль Асир
Тогда татары послали сказать кипчакам: “Мы с вами одного рода (происхождения), а эти аланы вам не родня, чтобы вы им помогали, и их религия не похожа на вашу. Мы вам даем обещание не трогать вас, и мы вам дадим сколько хотите денег и одежды, если вы не будете вмешиваться между нами и ими”. И действительно между ними состоялось соглашение относительно количества денег, одежды и т. д., которые они (должны были) дать им (кипчакам) и они действительно преподнесли им (кипчакам) то, о чем было уговорено, после чего кипчаки покинули город аланов: и на них напали татары, многих из них перебили, ограбили и увели в плен.
www.vostlit.info/Texts/rus/Athir_2/text6.phtml?id=7971
" If you are a Mongol, "-Medieval Mongols politonym.Which included medieval Tatars our ancestors.Like Russians today.Read this:
«В настоящее время, вследствие благоденствия Чингис-хана и его рода, поскольку они суть монголы, - [разные] тюркские племена, подобно джалаирам, татарам, ойратам, онгутам, кераитам, найманам, тангутам и прочим, из которых каждое имело определенное имя и специальное прозвище, - все они из-за самовосхваления называют себя [тоже] монголами, несмотря на то, что в древности они не признавали этого имени. Их теперешние потомки, таким образом, воображают, что они уже издревле относятся к имени монголов и именуются [этим] именем, - а это не так, ибо в древности монголы были [лишь] одним племенем из всей совокупности тюркских степных племен» (Рашид ад-Дин. Т. I. Кн. 1. С. 103).
Мэн да бэй лу
Теперь татары называют себя Великим монгольским государством, и поэтому пограничные чиновники именуют их [сокращенно] мэн-да. Но [эти] два государства отстоят друг от друга с востока на запад в общей сложности на несколько тысяч ли. Неизвестно почему [они] объединены под одним именем. Ибо в период процветания государства Цзинь были созданы северо-восточное вербовочно-карательное управление для обороны от монголов и Кореи и юго-западное вербовочно-карательное управление для контроля над территорией татар и Си Ся. Монголы, очевидно, занимали [земли, на которых находились] двадцать семь круглых крепостей того времени, когда У-ци-май начинал дело, а границы татар на востоке соприкасались с Линьхуаном, на западе располагались в соседстве с государством Ся, на юге доходили до Цзинчжоу и достигали государства Больших людей на севере”. Прежнее монгольское государство уже было уничтожено и что нынешние монголы и есть татары. В Гу-цзинь цзи-яо и-пянь Хуан Дун-фа сказано: “Существовало еще какое-то монгольское государство. [Оно] находилось к северо-востоку от чжурчжэней. Во времена цзиньского Ляна [оно] вместе с татарами причиняло зло на границах. Только в четвертом году нашего [периода правления] Цзя-дин [1211 - 1212] татары присвоили их имя и стали называться Великим монгольским государством”.
@@mr.purple1779
"Our data testify..."-What?!😅
Medieval Tatars are close to us ,modern Tatars!Read this:
Molecular Genealogy of a Mongol Queen's Family and Her Possible Kinship with Genghis Khan
Eastern Russian Tatars, Bashkirs, and Pakistani Hazara were found to carry R1b-M343 atunusually high frequencies of 12.65%, 46.07%, and 32%, respectively, compared to otherregions of Eastern Asia, which rarely have this haplotype (Fig 3)[40,42,43,49-53]. Interest-ingly, ancestors of those 3 populations were all closely associated with the medieval MongolEmpire. That is, Russian Tatars and Bashkirs are descendants of the Golden Horde (alsoknown as the Ulus of Jochi) that had been controlled by Jochi, the first son of Genghis Khan,and his descendants during the 12th-15thcenturies. In addition, some of the Hazara tribes arebelieved to consist of descendants of Mongolian soldiers and their slave women after the 1221siege of Bamiyan under the leadership of Genghis Khan [54,55]. Through domination ofHazara, Mongolians strongly influenced the genetic makeup of the Hazara people, especially inPakistan [49,54,56]. Some modern Hazara populations resemble Mongolians in their physicalattributes including facial bone structure. Similarly, the high frequency of R1b-M343 in geo-graphic regions associated with the past Mongol khanates including the Golden Horde (fromUral Mountain to Western Siberia, which includes Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, Azerbai-jan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan), Ilkhanate (Iran and neighboring territories including Arme-nia, Turkey, Georgia, Afghanistan, Syria, and Tajikistan), and Chagatai Khanate (from the Aralsea to the Altai mountain, including Pakistan (Hazara), Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan,India, and China), strongly suggest a close association between the Y haplotype R1b-M343 andthe past Mongol Empire (Fig 3)[42-44,49-53]
www.researchgate.net/publication/308121873_Molecular_Genealogy_of_a_Mongol_Queen's_Family_and_Her_Possible_Kinship_with_Genghis_Khan
"Volga Tatars incorporate three main ethnic components [53]; the Volga Bulgars, "-do not lie! Only descendants of the Volga Bulgars Chuvash!Read this:
www.jstor.org/stable/23658336
Чувашский язык, который так сильно отличается от остальных тюрко-татарских языков, принадлежит народу, который со всей уверенностью следует рассматривать в качестве наследников волжских булгар.
М.Рясянен.
Чуваши потомки волжских булгар.Чуваши на Средней Волги жили задолго до нападения татар.Дунайские хаган-болгары и Кубанские чёрные болгары связаны с ними.
А.А.Куник.
Do not forget that the medieval Tatars exterminated many Volga-Bulgarians.Therefore, the Volga Bulgars could not seriously affect the ethnogenesis of the medieval Tatars!
Even the Kazan Tatars have nothing to do with the Volga Bulgars!Read this:
МАТВЕЙ МЕХОВСКИЙ
ТРАКТАТ О ДВУХ САРМАТИЯХ
DE DUABUS SARMATIIS
Глава третья. О татарах козанских и татарах ногайских.
Третья орда - козанских татар - названа так по замку Козан, стоящему над рекой Волгой у границ Московии, где они живут.
Они произошли от главной татарской орды, а именно от чагадайских или заволжских татар, как и все другие татары.
www.vostlit.info/Texts/rus15/Mehovskij/frametext2.htm
БЛЕЗ ДЕ ВИЖЕНЕР
ОПИСАНИЕ ПОЛЬСКОГО КОРОЛЕВСТВА
(1573)
LA DESCRIPTION DY ROYAUME DE POLOGNE
Татары третьей орды называются казанскими, по имени крепости Казани, расположенной на реке Волге на границе с Московиею; они поселились здесь, отделившись, подобно прочим, от главной джагатайской орды. Казанская орда располагает 12,000 человек, способных носить оружие, а в случае необходимости могла бы стянуть до 30,000, призвавши на помощь своих союзников.
www.vostlit.info/Texts/rus14/Vizhener/text.phtml?id=395
You are not Tatar and we both know it very well!🤣😃😁
@@mr.purple1779 We Tatars are not Volga Bulgars!
Н. А. Баскаков
К ВОПРОСУ О КЛАССИФИКАЦИИ ТЮРКСКИХ ЯЗЫКОВ
(Известия АН СССР. Отделение литературы и языка. - Т. XI. Вып. 2. - М., 1952. - С. 121-134)
А. ЗАПАДНОХУННСКАЯ ВЕТВЬ ТЮРКСКИХ ЯЗЫКОВ
Западнохуннская ветвь тюркских народов исторически сложилась из тюркских племен, продвинувшихся на запад с древнейших времен и входивших последовательно в западнохуннский, а отчасти для некоторых племен и союзов исторически в более позднее время и в западно-тукюйский племенные союзы, из которых образовались крупные родо-племенные объединения и языки: 1) булгары и булгарская группа языков,. 2} огузы и огузская группа языков, 3) кыпчаки и кыпчакская группа языков, 4) карлуки и карлукская группа языков. Характерными особенностями тюркских языков западнохуннской ветви, отличающими эти языки от языков восточнохуннской ветви, являются:
В фонетической структуре: а) замещение древних з, д, т > либо древним р либо й, например, ура, айак, "нога" вместо адак, азак, атах и пр.; б) большая степень дифференциации глухих и звонких согласных: б - п, к - г, с - з, д - т; в) наличие дифференцированных согласных фонем х, в, h и пр.
Различия в основном словарном фонде и в словарном составе и, в частности, наличие значительного количества заимствованной лексики из языков арабского и иранских и относительно меньшее количество заимствований из монгольского языка.
В грамматическом строе: а) более развитая структура сложного предложения и наличие большего количества союзов и в том числе заимствованных из других языков; б) меньшее количество стяженных сочетаний: слов, выступающих в качестве сочетаний имен и глагольных форм, и т. п. Перечисленные здесь основные признаки отличают все тюркские языки западнохуннской ветви от тюркских языков восточнохуннской ветви.
I. Булгарская группа языков
Булгарская группа языков, к которой относятся: древние языки - булгарский, хазарский и современный чувашский язык, - образовалась в среде древнейшего населения Поволжья болгар или булгар (VI-XIV вв.), а также более поздних по времени дунайских булгар и хазар, непосредственных преемников племен, входивших в состав западных хунну, современными потомками которых являются сохранившие древний строй языка чуваши.
Характерными признаками языков булгарской группы и в частности чувашского языка, по которым он отличается от языков других групп, входящих в западную ветвь, являются:
В фонетической структуре: а) наличие особой системы вокализма, состоящего из трех широких и шести узких фонем; б) замещение некоторых гласных в начале слов языков других групп дифтонгами и дифтонгоидными сочетаниями, например: йерт- "водить" (вм. ерт-), йeкев "подпилок" (вм. егеу), йeр "след" (вм. из), вут "огонь" (вм. от), вырaн "место" (вм. орын) и пр.; в) явление ротацизма, т. е. замещения чередующихся согласных с/з ~ т/д ~ й в других языках согласным р - например, в конце слов з/с > р: caвар (вм. агыз || авыз) "рот", пар (вм. буз) "лед", хeр (вм. кыз), кeр (вм. кyз) "осень" и пр. - и в середине слов, например, ура (вм. адак, азак, айак и пр.) "нога" и т. д.; г) явление ламбдаизма, т. е. замещения согласного ш ~ с других языков согласным л, например, хeл (вм. кыш ~ кыс) "зима", тeлeк (вм. тyш ~ тyc) "сон", алак (вм. ишик, есик) "двери" и пр.
В основном словарном фонде: а) наличие в лексике значительного слоя слов, характеризующих только данную группу и отсутствующих в других тюркских языках, ср., например: caмса "нос", cурaм, каcaн "спина", арaм "женщина", cатма "сковорода", курка "ковш", cеcе "нога", тулa "пшеница", мaйaр "орех" и др., а также значительного слоя слов, общего по происхождению со славянскими словами, и лексики, общей по происхождению с угро-финскими языками.
В грамматическом строе: своеобразие морфологии и синтаксиса, в значительной степени отличающихся от морфологии и синтаксиса языков других групп.
What about the mud flood??...
"From the 15th to 18th centuries Crimean Tartars frequently raided Eastern Slavic lands to capture their inhabitants, enslaving an estimated three million people predominantly Ukrainians. " Wikipedia
1)Kizilov Mikhail -"Slave trade in the early modern Crimea"-Oxford University
2)Alan Fisher-Black sea slave trade-Canadian American Slavic studies,1972
Hence the reason why the term Slave comes from Slavic.
Yeah... as an eastern european it bothers me that fellow slavs blame the turkish empire for what the Crimean Khanate was doing.
I get where the confusion is coming from. Turkic ethnicity and islamic religion.
The turks of turkey however aka the ottomans were a very ahead of their time ppl
More civilized and tolerant than our neighbors to the west were at the time.
The Crimean Khanate however was ruthless.
The description of Ghengis you gave does not match any images I ever seen
2:22 now I know the origins of the Romanian word "Cazan" wich means cauldron; it seems like it was borowed from the golden horde at some point in time when we were conquered. Things like this are fascinating, since they can give you insides of that country's history and the people who invaded it!
@Kayra Han yeah, that's very likely too, since they are Turkic too, and Romania was vassalized for hundreds of years by them
Could be Turkish too
@@stephanyschneider5144 The Turks were a nice people.
tatars not so much.
@@FriendlyCroock tatars are turks bruh
@@nausus1083 "turkic"
1:43 didnt celts use pants? And didnt romans adopt the wearing of pants as they expanded north before encountering the huns?
At 15:24 I can read: "We are here" - that is cool given the fact that I speak not Tatar but Turkish. So both languages seem to differ only in dialects.
7:10 ... Chengez Khan was tall, red hair and blue eyes ... a typical European ...everyone tells me that Americans are not well educated ... you, sir, have proven it. The word Europe never existed until in recent years, some 5,000 years ago ... All modern Europeans are the progeny of the Fertile Crescent ... The word Europe stems from the Phoenician word Ereb, meaning West ... Mediterranean Sea was their Lake. They ruled from ancient to as late as 5 BC. They invented Alphabet, Seafaring / Marine, City Planning, Trade, Arts and Technologies ...Greek Cadmus is Phoenician Qadi Musa, who came to Greece and taught them Alphabet and the rest. I meant no disrespect to you, however, facts are facts.
Chengez Khan European??
What... WHAT? Is this comedy?
Propaganda to introduce the lie, that mankind was always in struggle and fighting against each other.
bullshit video
Do you have a video to propose me which would tell me the REAL history of the Tatar (not the mainstream "official" one), please?
@@cameleonfleuri ua-cam.com/video/5Vqvxt_EXnU/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/_tfxJmF7fAk/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/4mo5vhGIegI/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/OC1-aNdDxOo/v-deo.html
Yes, as new Blackadder
Wait so how much of this is related to Tartaria and how much is something entirely different like
Probably a small portion is true and the rest not so true (but based in truth)
The true appearance of Chinghiz Khan, the real History of the Tatars and many of Turkic peoples:
Perhaps you know, that an outstanding historian-scientist D. Iskhakov wrote: ‘the true history of the Tatars, of the people in every respect historical, is not written yet’.
However, recently were published books about the unwritten (hidden) real history of the Tatars by independent Tatar historian Gali Yenikey. His books present a new, or rather ‘well-forgotted old’ information about the real history of the Tatars and other Turkic peoples.
It must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists.
However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia:
According to data of many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name.
While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chinghiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chinghiz Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ (an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This confirmed by many little known facts. So in fact Chinghiz Khan was from among the medieval Tatars and the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples.
It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (in Tatar means 'Great Scripture').
But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu... So that the Tatars of Chinghiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among the Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others.
And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations...
About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, which was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of the dooks by Gali Yenikey, translated in Engilsh.
There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet: payhip.com/b/Xujb
On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chinghiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chinghiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chinghiz Khan: ‘My son Chinghiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chinghiz Khan...’.
And here's another interesting thing:
We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeiev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’.
But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): ua-cam.com/video/3WqB71gs5bc/v-deo.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after.
This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources.
This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb
For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC
This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.
Tatar was a name used by many people meaning different things in different times. Mongols were called Tatars by both the Chinese and Russians until relatively recently. Turkic Kaganate recorded nomadic tribes in northeastern Mongolian Plateau as Tatars. And Mongols recorded Mongolic tribes who didn't join the Empire as Tatars. The original meaning was OTHER PEOPLE or OUTSIDERS.
@@yo2trader539 alas, you have repeated here the false dogmas of the official "history of the Mongols". Read carefully this article by Vakil, or better the works by the independent historian Gali Yenikeiev.
@@Antipossevino Or you can read "Compendium of the languages of the Turks"
@@yo2trader539 sure. But not only this source - the writings of an independent historian Gali Yenikeiev contain information from many historical sources, including those that are ignored by official historians, since this information refutes the false official "history of the Mongols". Read more, know more, so as not to remain in captivity of false dogmas.
Tugenev wrote fathers and sons, not Tolstoy...
2:16 it’s a language called gokturk... ancient Turkic.
Says TURK
Turk comes from the ancient Turkic word Toruk... which means Strength.. ie. to be Turkic means to be 💪.
Cok iyi yapmis
Kocum benim 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
So if I'm from Bulgaria does that mean I'm Tatar decent?
no
They were in America too. You can find.that on old maps prior to 1500s. Mud floods proposes that alot of the buildings all over the America s were built by them.
Patrick Ong .....ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ....that's just stupid. They were nomads, that's true. But up until the late 1700's they lived in Yurts and small cities of low houses as described in the video. Apart from the city of Ulanbatan built in the late 1200's, then there's no evidence of any of them building massive multi story buildings with stone masonry and bricks. There is no evidence that these people built any ships either.
It is possible they made it across the Bering Strait. But no evidence anywhere that they built anything substantial. Other than your imagined Mud Flood. Oh and there's no real evidence of any such thing as a Mud Flood.
THERE IS A CIA DOCUMENT STATING THE JEWISH BOLSHEVIKS IN RUSSIA WERE BEHIND COVERING UP TATARIAN HISTORY SO THE MUSLIMS WOULDNT KNOW THIER HISTORY.
@H D Again, the proof and evidence says other wise. There is always going to be multiple religions but the base one in Tartaria was Islam. History is always re-written. Any one that studies real history knows that Christianity as a whole has done more damage than all others combined but is not treated that way.
you are the only one in this comment fest of nonsense, that has spoken any truth the tartars were a great nation of traders, of knowledge building and and flight.... the resets have put us back and the people who utilized the tunnels have been able to come out and take over the uninhabited regions only occupied by the new natives and smaller peoples..... they have re engineered electrical efforts look up letter benjamin franklin to french baileys about scientific notation he said united fakers stole it all..... so much ppl dont know just look the world fairs or the lost califa palaces
Jonlevi
The takeaway from this video is that it resulted from poor research. The Chinese didn't build a great wall; the great wall was built AGAINST invasion from China. Does that reversal reveal that we have lingering prejudices in our history?
Source for this information please.
@@imawildman Existing evidence and photos all show southern-oriented fortification with entries to the towers coming from the north of the Great Wall of China. The megalith builders were the Amurru that held the entire Amur River Drainage system and are considered in the Altai and Tarim Basin to be the critical race that brought agriculture and civilization. Navajo and Apache and the Dene/Athapaska group all have their Ket Gaelic language root from the Tarim Basin Giants. The Navajo say these giants "brought their own Mongolians" to settle North America. That makes the Chinese south of the Great Wall the Mongolians most likely in their view coz it's not the redheaded giants.
Genghis Khan was not a red haired European. (Citation-Needed)!
Tall, Red hair & blue Eyes???? I stooped watching after this. The narrator or whoever created this video just want to say that Europeans conquered China, Middle East & Eastern Europe.. but not Asians. What a load of bullshit. He's clearly Asians. The entire Siberia is filled with people with Asian features all the way to Alaska, Canada & Greenland.
define white
My grany was a krimean Tatar, whos escaped to island of Symy in Greece.she and my mom had dark black hair and brown eyes threfore i dont belive Russian version of Gengis khan having red hair myth.
@@chadgoings6336 european. There you go
@@blackstar19gammaburst85 There are non-european white people. White is a skin color.
I have a few things to say:
1. I'm pretty sure tribals in Europe like the Germans and Celts were wearing pants long before those horse nomads rode in from the steppes.
2. What's the source for that Ghengis Khan description?
The Crimea belongs to the tartars. Before Stalin came around, we had been there for 100s of years.
EuropaNostra Oh yeah, return it to the Greeks. That makes total sense
Yes ! I am tatar Crimean , living in Romania ! My grand grand parents moved from Crimea
Crimean Goths?
@@ainurainur5505 nice to see another crimean tatar from România (even if I am only 40%)...!!!
That' not true. Tatars were atacked Slavic tribes in Bulgaria . Tatars were tribes from desert Goby . We had recorded in Serbia from what territory they come from and theirs moove in Asia.
Actually ghengis khan came from an altaic tribe on the border of mongolia and Kazakhstan called the Boorjigin. Ghengis khan was a enemy to the mongolian tatars. At one point he almost wiped them out but was persuaded by one of his high rank commanders to show mercy upon them.
I call them a altaic tribe because they were one of many tribes that occupied the Altai mountains.
Why does he pronounce Attila like that? 😂
Does the word "Tatar" have a hidden "r" in the middle? I HEAR IT but I don't see it. Never have been sure if it should be there.
It's not "hidden", it is just two different words - Tatar is a nation (now a part of Russia) and Tartar is a sauce. There are other meanings to the second word, but essentially these are different things.
Correction trousers where warn in Western Europe far earlier than the hunic invasion celts also wore trousers
Tartars are celts just that went east
Actually Iranians and Celts wore trousers around 800 BC and before.
Gengiz Khan was R1b haplogroup.
jim crow this is slavic dna
😂😂😂have you checked?
7:00
Tall red hair is commom among Asian Ethnic groups in Mongolia too. Such as Daughrs.
Assuming he was a European looking man is not logical.
Even though there were golden hair ethnic group, and literally white mixed people from Xiongnu empire period in Asia.
With Tatarian Empire reaching as far west as the Huns, It's safe to say that most of eastern Europe might be loosely considered Tatar homeland. Crimea I believe has always been one of the central focal points of the Tatar peoples.
They went more west than you may think (see Cristopher Columbus)
Also in 1850-1900 they demolished thousands of giant rock buildings in US saying they were burnt by fire. Same story in all states all over America.
There never was a Tartarian Empire. Where are their history books? What did they invent? Where are their coins? There is no historical documents of any of the above. Fomenko is a fraud. For instance the Roman Empire which was worldwide had their own coins, their own art, books Etc.
@@okthen77the Crimean Khanate and they were a big part of the Golden Horde
Description of gangesh khan is so wrong.
I am also a tatar. From Pakistan multan. Me and my father and my grand father also have a Mongolian spot. I have on behind of my shoulder. My father on arm. And grandfather on back
Tatars are not Mongols, we are ethnic Europeans, you are just a Mongol
@@arabjmoh5124 crimean tatars are turk
@@arabjmoh5124europeans?😂😂😂
@@Nenet-rj9yr yea
@@Nenet-rj9yr Google what Tatars look like
Not mentioning evaporation of Tatar language and culture because of Russian expansionism, they became pretty much russian like people, and most tatars I know cannot speak their language.
Just like what China doing to Uygurs. They are not allowed to speak their language, practice their religion and know their history. All this is handful of people threatens and scares billions of Chinese. Just like in Russia, the way Tatars has been treated. Not much different between them. Shame.
Buten Tatarlarga biz Korea Tatarlar salam aytamuz. 안녕하세요. 타타르 민족 의 선조 나라 사람입니다.
The ethnic origin of the Tatar began in ancient Korea and Manchuria.
1) They were recorded, for the first time in history, in the Orkhon Turkic Steles (Stone monument) built for Bilge Kagan and his younger brother Ko'l Tegin in 730~740s.
2) Later, recorded about them for the 1st time in book form.
3) Based on these records, the Tatars were originally Koguryeo-an (ancient Korean) people who fled to the Eastern Turk Kaghanate (modern day Mongolia, Tuva, and Hakkaz, Altai mountain areas) due to the collapse of Koguryeo in 668 AD as the result of the war between Tang--Silla allies v.s. Koguryeo Kingdom in 668AD.
4) The ethnic name of Tatar comes from ancient Korean word "Taedaero (Prime Minister vice cum Defense Minister of Koguryeo Kingdom)". No famous scholars of the West and East such as Baskakov, Yeremiyev, Budagov, Berezin, Fakiyev, Ahsen Batur… etc) could ever figure this out because they did not understand Korean language and history except for Hive Han Abulghazi Khan several hundred years ago (because he was on of the descendants of ancient Koreans).
But you can read more details here in the book 고구려 발해인 칭기스 칸(Koguyreo-Barhae-an Ghenghiz Khan) written by 전원철 박사 who is me. pp. 182~247:
search.naver.com/search.naver?where=nexearch&sm=top_sly.hst&fbm=0&acr=1&ie=utf8&query=%EC%A0%84%EC%9B%90%EC%B2%A0+%EB%B0%95%EC%82%AC
They joined the Eastern Turkic Kaghanate and became the Son-in-law tribe of Buk Chor ( 𐰴𐰯𐰍𐰣 𐰴𐰍𐰣 Qapaγan) Qaγan, the father of Princess Acena and uncle of Ku'l Tegin and Bilge Kagan.
5) They lived there and partly Turkicized as time passed by. So, they became Turkic speaking people eventually, but they still preserve their ethnic name Khorai=Khongurai=Tadar. After 840, the Eastern Turkic Kaganate collapsed as the result of the Uighur upsurge and revolution against the Eastern Turkic Kagan, Ozmish.
6) As a result, some Tatar tribes ran away with the Turks towards the west via Siberia and some tribes joined the Uighur Kagan and made a new dynasty. The famous Ko Sanggun who escorted Uigur princess to Tang State was a Tatar Chieftain.
7) These Tatars later migrated to the modern day Tataristan and other parts of the world and they were localized with other Turkic and Slavic group of people and, ethnically, they also changed their appearances.
On the 2nd link above, (www.worldatlas.com/articles/w.../ Who are the Tartar People? - WorldAtlas) it is wrongly said: " The name Tatar may have been coined in the 5th century by nomadic Mongolic-speakers in the Tatar confederation.", But this is not true. They were not "Mongolic-speakers", but Korean-speakers. Khorai means Korea and Kon-gurai (Kon-Khorai) means Ko-gureyo (Great-Korea). There are no such words like Khorai or Kongurai nor Tatar in Mongol vocabulary except that the Mongols adopted the word "Tatar" without knowing the meaning.
However, Chinghiz (Ghenghiz) Khan, the Great Mongol leader, and the World Conqueror, shares the same blood line with the Ha-Khans of Tatar Kaganate because both of them are descendants of the Royal Family of Koguryeo Kingdom. So, Temujin Uge (and Kori Boka, Chieftains of the Tatars) who were (was) captured by Yesugay Baatar, the father of Chinghiz Khan, has the same personal name of Temujin, which is the name of the 3rd King of Kogureyo Kingdom (37 BC -668 AD), King Taemushin (Great Godly Martial King).
Regarding the origin of Tatar Kingdom in Kazakhstan and Siberia around Irtish River, and how it is related to the ancient Koreans, you may read my articles here (1~3 from the top), using Google translator because my articles are written in Korean. (4~13 from the top, are related to the secrets in the origin of Chinghiz Khan etc.)
jmagazine.joins.com/all/search?year_1=&month_1=&year_2=&month_2=&sourcecode=&prs_issue=&keyword=%EC%A0%84%EC%9B%90%EC%B2%A0
This magazine co. is the 2nd largest journalist company in Korea:
jmagazine.joins.com/all/search?year_1=&month_1=&year_2=&month_2=&sourcecode=&prs_issue=&keyword=%EC%A0%84%EC%9B%90%EC%B2%A0
Yakshi gunlar bolsin. 안녕~~~!
Great information thanks
this is so interesting, i am definitely going to read about this.
where is the cia document link? Can't find it
Like the way this just skips the savagery of the Bolsheviks but empathizes the war against the "fascists".
@ 5:10 ... Turgenev wrote the novel, Fathers and Sons, ... not Tolstoy.
That's what everyone is angry about here... right?
No f
Ar
Men Azerbaycan Türküyem, Tatar dilini burada oxuyub anladiqimi gördüm )) Azerbaycan diline cox oxsayir
Did the Tatars or Huns conquer Alexander the Great? or who did?
No one conquered him, he died from an allergic reaction to a bee sting. They merged with the Persians who they conquered and kind of fazed out over time.
He must have got this information from the liebrary
While you got yours from some shady youtube videos. Right.
@@Siska0Robert How bold of you to assume
Agree
library
@@tedrowland8672 play on words
Pretty sure it was one of the Persian feudal houses/empires that created pants for riding horses. Off the top of head I would say perhaps during the rule of the Sasanians.
Tartarian architecture is all over the world. Australia New Zealand Japan.
How this possible. The Turkic Tatars?
Tartar ≠ Tatar
Yes lots of our history is misleading .
Tartarian buildinds being pulled down and replaced with rectangular ugly ones.
Really? Give a GPS please
@D'lish Donut who's then .. please
Fathers and sons is a novel by Turgenev not Tolstoy
some big lies in this video
Global Warming
Which one
Gengiz Khan red haired and blue eyed?
That depiction came from some persian script that was written somewhere in the middle of 14 century in place somewhere in modern day turk. Almost 200 years after his death. How accurate do you think it is.
By the way Turkis khaganate are not the modern day turks. There is a saying:
Turkis father and Persian mother makes Turkmen. Turkmen father and Greek mother makes Turks.
We know that Atilla wasn't poisoned by his wife, he died of a burst ulcer which developed from his VERY well documented drinking habits. On top of that the wife spent the entire night cuddling the dead body to prove she didn't kill him so give her some slack
You saw that too, did you?
Can you make a video of who are the turkish people or the oghuz turks ?
Please
This was a very good History of old Bulgarian empires
Are there any commomtaters left ?
They are not tatars.Tatars is just a tribe of mongols.They are Kipchak Turks,tatar name stuck on them since Golden Horde,the founder was Tatar(mongol)they got assimilated real fast,they dont speak mongol they speak turkic.2 totally different languages not even numbers and love words are similar.They should change the name to Kipchakistan but no one cares i think.
Fenasi Kerim their the same hittites...thats why the turks say themselves they related to the monogloid native americans of america
?
Fenasi Kerim ua-cam.com/video/UL_178su7IE/v-deo.html
There was a ice bridge between Kamchatka and Alaska 15000 years ago so it makes sense they still use some words still.But native americans are considered a separate race today on its own apart from caucosoid,mongoloid,negroid.All humans are related for that matter.But i don't see relevance between my original comment.
I am Mongolian. Can confirm. Tatar used to be an ancient Mongol clan then traveled to Southern Russia with Jochi's horde which later became the "Golden Horde", after they arrived they became assimilated with the numerous local Turkic tribes and Tatar clan became Turkified. Modern Tatars have very little Mongol genes
Was Tomas Tatar's fam some?
Some good info on the video. However there weren’t any portraits of Genghis Khan available even during his life time. It was forbidden to create his portraits. All of the current available portraits of Genghis today are all assumptions. Nobody knows what he really looked like. For a man of his statue he suddenly had a lot of enemies. Therefore, it’s understandable that he doesn’t want anyone to recognize him.
It’s entirely possible that he could look Caucasus given they were around the Eurasia vicinity. But I highly doubt it. His origin was 100% mongol.
Lucky Luke
ua-cam.com/video/e_DxZVV8Eiw/v-deo.html
These images show Scythian and Alans not Mongols and Tatars. Look at their garments. Unfortunately this clip is very misleading that being informative.
Pants came from Germanic and Thracian tribes when they took over Rome
Romans had already adopted pants before that
Malivamar Romans’ were wearing skirts n robes. The huns were the first to wear pants. These Steppe people were the first to domesticated horses n ride them. Can’t ride horse wearing yo skirts lmao
blastroise hunt um no the romans rode horses
But all humans have a bone called Sella Turcica. Hehe
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sella_turcica
What's with the sound effects? Are we in kindergarten or what????
I love Tatar sauce, it compliments the hell out sea food. Nice....
Your a fuckwit
It's tartar sause not tatar. One has nothing to do with another
Why is it you're able to pronounce KHANATE correctly (2 syllables), while KHAGANATE was pronounced with 4 when it should be only 3?
"in Europe, nothing was really going on!" lmao, please
He's being sarcastic, but also telling the truth. The dark ages were a time when the European civilization went backwards in development and philosophy
What about the one's who lived in Amerika, chitty chitty bang bang was based on Tartar's
THE TRUE ҺISTORY OF TATARS:
Perhaps you know, that an outstanding Tatar historian-scientist D. Iskhakov wrote: “the true history of Tatars, of the people in every respect historical, is not written yet”.
However, recently were published books about the unwritten (hidden) real history of Tatars, written by independent Tatar Historian Galy Yenikeyev. His books presents a new, or rather "well-forgotten old" information about the true history of the Tatars and other Turkic peoples.
It must be said, that in official history there are many pro-Chinese and Persian falsifications about the "tatars - wild nomads" etc.
Therefore, primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names "Mongol" and "Tatar" (“Tartar") in the medieval Eurasia:
the name "Mongol" until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While “the name "Tatar" was “the name of the native ethnos (nation) of Genghis Khan …” , “…Genghis Khan and his people did not speak the language, which we now call the "Mongolian”…" (Russian academic-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev, 19th century). This is also confirmed by many other little known facts.
So in fact Genghis Khan was a Tatar and a great leader of the all Turkic peoples. But with time many of his descendants and tribesmen became spiritually disabled and forgot him and his invaluable doctrine and covenants... Tatars of Genghis Khan -medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among the Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others.
And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite the politicians of the tsars Romanovs and Bolsheviks dictators had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations...
About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of the Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, which was hidden from us, had been written, in detail and proved, in the book "Forgotten Heritage of Tatars" (by Galy Yenikeyev).
There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English and Russian languages) you can easily find in the Internet, on Smashwords company website: www.smashwords.com/profile/view/MIG17
On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Genghis Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source «About the clan of Genghis-Khan» its author gives the words of the mother of Genghis-Khan: «My son Genghis looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse» [34, p. 14]. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar story. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Genghis-Khan...".
Rais Karauchy tatar not tartar, but the name of tartar from latin language the mean's " the evils from the hell " this name just for mongol warriors ( specially not globally ). And the tatars were turkic people ( the turks ) and one of turkic and tribes, the tatars not mongol but were turkic people ( the nomadic turks ).
Rais Karauchy tartar from latin language " tartarus " just for mongol warriors .
Tatar is means "Stranger" in Turkish/Turkic language
Fauzi Bin Bakht you are Wrong!!! Ta is means Persian/Stranger/Enemy in Turkic language. Tat is means Persians/Strangers/Enemies. But this word using for Persians(Especially). Ar/Er/İr means the man/human. Tatar is means Strangers. Another example Tacik/Tajik. This word is means little Persians. Or Talısh. This words is means Iranians. Or Tatık. This word is means Persianicized Turk. This terms are Turkic.
Tatars are Bulgarian, like Oyghurs, Chuvash, Bashkir, Balkar, Chechen, Ingush etc.
Where the pan-turkic theory fails is that Chechen, Ingush and Balkars have practically the same culture, while Chechen, Ingush, Dagestani are not turkic-speaking. The common denominator is Bulgaria.
Bulgarians have been speaking Bulgar (now called a Turkic language) long before people on the east of Turan Yorta started calling themselves Turk.
Turkic like Slavic is not ethnic group, it's a language group. There is no Turkic ethnicity. Turan Yorta (AKA Turkic Khaganate) was formed by Bulgars, Avars and Khazars. People of the east of Turan Yorta started calling themselves Turk in the 6th century.
The culture and traditions are Bulgar.
Yeh they did not really offer any protection at all... During the tatar yoke multiple cities such as Kiev, the ancient capital of Rus' were simply razed and the khans did not ever protect Rus' against anything and even often raided it for extra money. An example that proves that the point of protection is the war with the Livonian Order where Tatar vassal Novgorod fought without any support from the tatars.
This is a terrible video. It's jumbled, gabbled, rushed, goes all over the place, does not make connections clear, introduces things too briefly for them to be understood, is full of mispronunciations and outright falsehoods, and the background music is generally incongruous. I could honestly do a more informative video just reading out the Wikipedia page.
@NeoTurkism Complete ad hominem! And from someone whose username indicates they have an ethnic political bias.
If you wish to improve the standing of Turkic peoples you should want good quality videos on them, not defend bad quality ones just because they are about them.
@NeoTurkism Heh sorry! But do you really think it is a Westerner doing this video? Where is the Mardjani Institute of History?
I think the guy who gave sound to this video was in a hurry to go shopping with his wife, she may have threatened him, and he has to catch the bus which will arrive in two minutes....
As far as I understood the narrator insists that Genghis Khan looked like Mel Gibson in Braveheart. Has this guy ever visited Central Asia, Kazakhstan or Russia east from Ural Mountains? The lands of nomadic ancestry? I doubt so. There are a few blonde, red and most commonly brown haired mongoloids with blue, grey and green eyes. I've met a small amount of blonde mongoloids with blue eyes. Most recently it was an old man with blue eyes (not sure about his hair colour as I mentioned he was old and almost bald). It so happened that we had a small conversation using two languages one of which was of turcic family. We both looked a little bit uncommon for our ethnicity. I used to have curly and red ish hair when I was kid (looked a bit tatar ish people would say). They just got darker when I grew up. European you say? Don't be so ridiculous. There are plenty of people there who can make you feel confused. I know a case when an acquaintance of mine a red haired englishman was taken for chinese in China. He was told that there are actually red haired chinese in North China. The guy looked very european (or very russian to me). And don't forget to refer to a cultural difference. Chinese most likely call red hair everyone whose hair is lighter than coal black. Asians, europeans...have you ever heard term eurasians? Cross-culture or intersections of civilization? Those terms are incredibly ancient. Those terms well describe nomads of the steppes and give a good hint about who the hack was Chingis Khan.
It doesnt matter what you think. Red hair peoples dominated EVERY culture. The ancient GIANTS were red haired blue eyed.They controlled the earth LONG BEFORE modern man.
06Dragonhunter
Some Europeans are arrogant. They cannot suffer from the fact that Europe were once conquered by Asian Mongoloid. They can only accept Asian white skinned Caucasoid invaded them, but in no way the yellowish Mongoloid.
Genghis Khan family were erotic so they have had so many offspring of hundred thousand left behind. Genghis Khan family was originated in inner Mongol where was more Chinese influence than European influence. These lead to the conclusion when looking at the faces of current Mongolian people, of that their ancestor Genghis Khan was most likely not European look.
The red hair blue eyes are the decedents of Huns, the European invaders, ruling and enslaving Kazakh and Mongol by that time. Han Chinese called them Xiongnu after they mixing blood with Tatar and Mongol. Actually they were Slav or Turk or Arab or Jew in origin as migrated foreign, but not Tatar or Mongol. Both pure-blooded Tatar and Mongol are Mongoloid Asian with Chinese look.
Siberia Yakut Ladies (75% of Tatar, 10% of Mongol and 5% Eskimo)
ua-cam.com/video/PaAnIAbWfDw/v-deo.html
Siberia Evenki people (60% of Mongol and 35 of Tatar)
ua-cam.com/video/CZpJAJDGNPQ/v-deo.html
False Tatar - Crimean Tatar (30% Slav, 28% Tatar, 17% Jew/Turk/Arab, 8% Mongol, 2% Han). Actually they are modern Xiongnu.
ua-cam.com/video/Obv_tZzUA8s/v-deo.html
Did they invent Tatar Tots?
"Tartar" is a 'sauce'....it's TATAR !!!
I thought 'tartar' was that hard mineralized plaque on your teeth that dentists scrape off with sharp dental tools
ua-cam.com/video/e_DxZVV8Eiw/v-deo.html
‘Interesting’, thanks. But not just the video:
Here they tried to briefly retell the content (or rather the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikeiv. That is they conceal where the information was taken from. But it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - the authors of the video, apparently, did not dare to show the real history of the Tatars, beeng afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’.
But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video, however, this portrait is showing both before and after.
This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeiev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Ciingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources.
This portait was used by authorths of this video without Yenikeiev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeiev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of the Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb
For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC
That is, all of this is called plagiarism - that is, theft - among the decent people.
According to the content of this video must be said the following:
ideologists of different times have invented a lot to hide in the darkness the history of ‘the own nation of Chingiz Khan, whose name and self-name was no other as 'Tatars’, and this people never spoke 'the language that we now call 'Mongolian'... ‘ (Russian academician orientalist V. Vasiliev, 19th century) - see more about the real History of Tatars in the books of the independent historian G. R. Yenikeiev.
Official history hides the fact that in the past existed the nation of medieval Tatars that were the ancestors not only of those who still ‘preserved this proud name - Tatars’ (L. N. Gumilev), but also of many representatives of modern Turkic peoples and a significant part of the modern Russian people. Precisely in order to ‘ divide and rule’ over them.
About all of this and much more from the hidden history of the Tatars and Eurasia reasonably and argumentatively has written in the books of the independent historian G. R. Yenikeiev.
But nothing about stated above is not said in this video, that is, it is “not a brief history of the Tatars”, but haphazardly sketched out some ‘grains of the history of the Tatars’
I love this kind of history except for names being pronounced badly. It affects the whole video
Depends on your language. I'm sure Jesus sounds completely different depending if you're of Spanish or English decent.
did michio kukubird write this
Ahmet davudoglu was turkeys president 2014 - 2016 . His a Tatar turk
FiFi he was never president idiot and tatar is tatar not turk , turk is a reference to anatolia
so according to this the Mongols and Tatars are the same people? also it should be noted that while the Yassa is mentioned there is no proof it existed. Wikipedia notes;” the Yassa or law was a secret written code of law. it was never made public. The absence of any physical document is historically problematic. Historians are left with secondary sources, conjecture and speculation, which describes much of the content of this overview. Historical certainty about the Yassa is weak compared to the much older Code of Hammurabi 18th century BCE or the Edicts of Ashoka, 3rd century BCE. “ so we don’t even know that it existed much less some legal system was ever set up to preside over the law. the Romans were tolerant of religions for the most part as were many empires throughout history. i don’t understand why people act as if the Mongols were the only group that allowed such a thing.
ua-cam.com/video/e_DxZVV8Eiw/v-deo.html
the invasion of the Turks to the West is shown as good, but the invasion of the West to the Horde is shown as bad. Why? Of course, the Russians did not like it when young Tatar and Nogai dzhigits robbed them with kalym for their brides, when they were sold into slavery in the largest slave market in the Crimean khanate.
What about tartar sauce?
The Tatars/Tartars/Tartarians are the Basques/Holy Grail & whoever denies this is lying.
Nothing holy about these people
Hilarious.
@@simonh6371 Hilarious is knowing how this ends & that you will perish.
@@scienceownsimposters2142 Not hilarious but not terrible either.
Great video! My only comment is that the Great Steppe is actually two-three times bigger than what is shown here.