But, Emily, it is not only the chat that makes this the #1 channel for trials. It is you. You cover these topics and trials with the right amount of empathy, humour, respect and knowledge all in the right places. I can imagine the majority of chat feeling that you are speaking to each one personally.
Right? We just took a major side quest 😳 And I hate it for Helyna’s family, but at the same time, if someone with such high powered attorneys on such a high profile case can’t get fairness, how can any of us? I also was not sure until more evidence was presented if it was even right to charge Baldwin as an actor. I could get on board more as a producer. But as an actor, he should be able to rely on the armorer and AD doing their jobs so that he was never in a position to cause harm. And I disagree with those shouting “cardinal rules of safety” when it comes to a movie set. Even if he was violating some safety rule imposed clearly on actors, which hadn’t been proven in court yet, the armorer was supposed to be there to supervise and stop the behavior. And again, my mind wasn’t made up yet on whether AB should have been held criminally liable. What I remember from HGR’s trial was that there aren’t very clear safety standards in the industry even around armorers, so I don’t recall any clear safety standards for actors to follow. IMO, Hannah and Halls were the two most culpable, and the state erred in giving Halls such a sweetheart deal so quickly. Of all the shenanigans, that deal with Halls makes me the most angry.
@@shkrjam84 Halls got the sweetheart deal because the original prosecutor was, in my opinion , had an agenda to get Baldwin because he is Alec Baldwin. An agenda that Morrissey unfairly got saddled with when she was appointed the special prosecutor. Morrissey most likely would have gone after Halls with the same energy as she did with HGR if there was no deal. I fully believed Morrissey charged Baldwin because she truly believed he was the last failed link in the safety chain. I'm still not convinced she had it out for ACTOR MAN, but I do think she had the win at all cost mentality. I have been saying all along, hubris and arrogance ended Halyna Hutchins and now hubris and arrogance ended this case. I believe Baldwin should have been charged as a producer as well, but then again I believe all the producers, specifically the one that hired HGR, should have been charged, but that didn't happen. And I don't think it is the duty of an actor to pull the blanks and check them, but they should be following the rules the armorer establishes to a T. Baldwin didn't even attend the safety meeting. I was hoping that in light of this case concrete, clear rules and regulations would be set for movie/TV productions. But as for Baldwin, what I think makes him responsible are his own words. I'm paraphrasing here but, he has all sorts of experience with onset weapo ns safety, knows not to point any at anyone and knows blanks are still fatally dangerous. And yet he ignored it all. I 100% agree that the judge did the right thing. I already respected her before, my respect for her now is just through the roof. And I really, really liked Morrissey, despite her second direct thinly disguised as a re-direct and her frustrated school teacher tone. She proved to be a huge, shady disappointment.
@@marymaclaren9553 totally agree! I think Morrisey believed in the case but got caught up in the win at all costs, and I think she would have definitely gone after Halls if it had been up to her. It’s really sad, I feel for the Hutchins’ family in all this.
@@shkrjam84 And this is me just having too much free time to live inside my head, but seeing Judge Sommer's demeanor, hearing her reasons while sentencing HGR, I think her anger was not only because of the corruption of Morrissey and LE conveniently forgetting (hiding) evidence, but she also believed in the case and now had to throw it all away. I hope for nothing but comfort for Hutchins’ family.
Emily, you have been my comfort voice for a few years now, If Im anxious or depressed, you are perfect calming distraction for my adhd brain. ❤ Thank you
EDB: I can't stream for four hours like I did last night I have meetings today Me: pauses video to see I'm 2hrs+ into an almost 6 hour stream 😂 💜 I love it
Who had "Santa Fe Sheriff's Office files evidence under rando unconnected case number" on their bingo card? Also, who believes that the time they got caught is coincidentally the ONLY time they've ever played "3-case-monte" with evidence?
I have watched you since Tati and I am usually in the replay crew…so this comment isn’t “live”. As I am watching in the replay crew, I had to hit pause and leave my first you tube comment (pretty sure it’s my first) after watching you talk about how truly amazing the chat is. And how the chat has made a difference in how we can debate with one another without attacking, and that the chat is what makes this community great. I do agree with you BUT I wanted to tell you it’s because of you. So THANK YOU Emily D Baker!!! Thank you and I appreciate you for making a change in how we consume information. Facts based and always asking questions. As someone that has also served on a jury, I appreciate you taking the time to say…don’t mess with the jury. Those worlds “don’t mess with the jury” need to be taken very seriously and I am so glad you said it. So again, thank you and I appreciate you!
Emily, Thanks! I try to summarize the happenings to my family which doesn’t want to watch & does not appreciate the “details” but still wants updates! It’s hard sometimes!
I live in New Mexico and once waited over two years to see a specialist, the only one in the state. More common specialties have a 3-6 month wait list, but it took almost two years for me to get a six-month follow up to one, because the doc’s schedule would be full within an hour or so of the calendar opening each month. It felt like trying to get Taylor Swift tickets! The notion that a doctor in CA could do jury duty and just have someone cover for them is wild to me! Good for California. I hope it’ll be like that here someday!
I think Morrissey did know the rounds were visually similar. She may not have ever looked at them, but I think Hancock told her they had a probelm with those rounds and thats why they purposefully buried them in a different case file. She claims they would have been "the best evidence" against HG, but they also would have been a defense of sabotage by Kinny. Defense could have raked them on why they were so friendly with Kinny and it could have tainted SZ testimony too. And thats only AFTER defense informed the Judge of this late discovery and how LE and prosecutor knew these rounds were out there but never tried to get them. It would have been a mess right at the end of HG's trial so Morissey buried it
Quite possibly. But there's a saying called Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." Either way, it looks bad, and calls the actions of Hancock and Morrissey into question. When I watched Seth Kenney's police interview, I thought he was awfully quick to throw Gutierrez-Reed under the bus. And the detective seemed to be awfully...what's the word I want...deferential to him. It looked weird. Now I'm thinking he was trying very hard to avoid responsiblity.
Tom questioning whether Rachel has a soul or not for suing Ariana while demanding Ariana pays for any monetary damages is (inner Regina George) such a skeeze move.
Wasn’t high on Baldwin’s defense team but Spiro was amazing Friday. He is much better at improvising and coming up with questions on the fly. He put the nail in the coffin for Morrisey. You love to see it.
It was amazing watching him question Cpl. Hancock during the hearing last Friday. She could tell he was getting at something, but she had no clue what it was.
Amazing analysis. To address your comment about being #1 for live coverage. I was watching another LawTube channel but their coverage was so biased, i left the stream and joined your live. Wont make that mistake again. It appears chat members can either become biased or gravitate to those that match their energy and opinion. I enjoy a nuanced review where we can understand the law and facts. A six hour stream, i think i napped through 30 minutes of todays stream. Appreciate you. I feel for the juries. Id want to be annonymous too.
On the KR matter- THIS is what happens when so many have lost complete faith in our ‘justice system’…. This shouldn’t surprise anyone that people are raising up in outrage over the this fucked up system. Sucks for the jury thankfully the court will protect them, but the fight can’t stop.
Yeah, this is way more about the town politics than the jurors. Some people are saying things about the jurors out of frustration, but it's really about the sense that the public isn't safe with MSP and Canton PD protecting their friends committing crimes and going after outsiders whether they've done anything or not...
@@thebmjdcgroup3910exactly this hurts the system it brings more mistrust no matter what side someone is on they shouldn't be taking it out on the jury
Me: Sees there's new Karen Read filings..."EDB streams at 11:00am. There's no way these will be covered today." Also Me, 1 Hour Later Sitting in Work Meeting: *Gets app notification* "Damnit..." What's up replay crew!!!!
I’m in the same boat. I’ve been saying she was corrupt and solely focused on her own interests (regardless of who is harmed in the process) from the jump, and this only proves it. Her attitude was so off putting to me that it left me wanting her to lose at any cost.
Yeah she was feisty and rude but she was a very good attourney...it's a shame and that meltdown on the stand was hard to watch .... although I kind of do believe she was misled by Poppell and Hancock...I mean prosecutors are on a very sticky spot if law enforcement lies to them, and it's ironic but she made the same mistake she was putting people in jail for: Not checking every single bullet...
Replay crew also! So bummed I missed the Erlinda interview since it was in the member spaces. Any chance you could review it with us on a stream too since 95% of us in the poll on Monday wanted to watch it with you? Thanks for all you do 💜
I imagine it would get claimed by the original producer and that's why it was members only. UA-cam is a bit grabby with copyright nowadays. The interview is on UA-cam but without Emily, unfortunately.
New Jersey is a one party consent state but revenge porn is illegal. I am teaching my granddaughters that you never trust anyone to put you in that position. It’s all good when you think they love you but it can go very wrong.
i may be wrong but didn’t rachel say she was in her house in california? if so, the two party consent still stands and could be considered wiretapping. i only know this because of kim recording taylor during their phone call with kayne during the whole “made that bitch famous” incident.
I feel like I need to rewatch the first two days of Baldwin. I feel like maybe there was some merit to the defense accusing them of covering stuff up the whole time from the beginning
Tbh even all their pre-trial filings did the same thing. I might go and rewatch those as I mostly skimmed. But they were fighting like heck for MONTHS and I just presumed it was regular defence strategy
Yeah, Kari lied to the court at least once. She said "I didn't know about any of this until today", when she had known about it since Hannah's trial ended. She knew the ammunition was in evidence and she had known that Hancock put a different case number on it. she was present in the meetings.
Can you please cover the pre trial hearings in the Karen Read case? I would love to hear your opinion of the FBI letters and Lally motion to keep the FBI docs out of the case.
I STILL do not understand why the local debate about harassment VS legit first amendment-allowed scrutiny of local community members who may or may not have committed or witnessed a crime was allowed by the judge into the trial while the FBI docs weren't.
Looking at Time 4:30:31 when Emily does a ‘New Filing’ “We’re going to cover this quickly 😂 Looks at length of stream : 5:56:16 Girrrrl! Much love and appreciation for your dedication and humour 🎉😂
The doctors...live in VT, so one of the specialist I worked with was the only one in the state. Rotated with oncall with hospitals out of state. People would die if they weren't able to work.
Which side was the one to bring 3 witnesses in that had little to no relationship with John in during closing arguments. We should have a better judge.
Not me over here getting teared up over EDB talking about the chat and the respect…. But I have to say…. We could not have a space to come together in a respectful manner without you…. You gifted us this space to be genuinely curious about law and to learn and discuss cases where we can be ourselves without being run off for being objective
I have a question, will Morrisey go after Poppell and Hancock to prove they were not honest with her about what the bullets looked like and Hancock's ineptitude on contacting Teske? Both those women perjured themselves on the stand, who's job is it to go after them? The judge's or the prosecutor's?
My frustration when I started talking about the nine HUNDRED pages of documents of "ish" with my family tonight and my father decides to chime in about the case but then replaces Baldwin with a political candidate instead of staying on (rare from myself) conversation topic.... I absolutely appreciate EDB's coverage of cases, and breakdown of court lingo for the regular person. [edit for comment point]
ReplayCrew💜 - 2:43:44 Exactly, @EDB. I used to *hate* aging. Now, I'm looking forward to 50. I never thought I'd say that. But, the wiry silver and gray? Nah, it's gotta go. Skunk stripe right down the middle is not a good look for me.😂 Here's to getting older and wiser! 🥂
I feel bad for the jurors but the court caused some of those fears by letting witnesses lie under oath about their harassment cases that haven't been determined yet. The journalist has the right to not be slandered too.
My husband's works as a deputy so I had him listening to the messy young thug stuff, when he proceeded to tell me a story about how disgusting courthouses can be. A deputy and a civilian employee got it on in one of the jury rooms... They are no longer employed with the sheriff's office😂
As to your question to chat about Hannah, I personally believe that G. Pickle has culpability in the death of Mrs. Hutchins. She told Hannah she had to help Sarah with props, not her job! She was not hired as Props Assistant, she was the Armorer. Pickle forced Hannah into a dangerous position to save money. It is her fault that Hannah was rushed consistently in her very important position as Armorer. Hannah was reprimanded for not " helping with props" and her Armorer hours cut, by G. Pickle.
I am so torn on the HG stuff because the fuckery but like she screwed up big time and someone died and I it doesn't feel right for her to just go free....
@@nailjaumbatova4947 my sweet summer child, they are not going to SAY they're afraid of police harassment. Read between the lines and remember what we saw in this case.
Yes, who hasn't been found guilty and I've seen enough to know its most likely getting thrown out. I blame the court for letting it in as a lot of it has been proven to be lies already. Sorry for juries fear but they should be worried more about those witnesses.@@nailjaumbatova4947
It surprises and also doesn't surprise me that people still need to be told that someone engaging in immoral behavior (e.g., adultery) does not mean we get to strip them of all fundamental rights and protections.
nuanced question here! the argument everyone is getting into over the Ariana lawsuit is regarding the law wording - to my understanding the word "distribute" implies, by definition, third party recipients. many are arguing that the mere sending of the video constitutes "distribution". assuming for this example that Rachel has no evidence & that Ariana did not send the video to any third party and ONLY sent it to Rachel - doesn't that *not* meet the criteria for revenge p? invasion of privacy, yes. but revenge p? I just don't see how they can make the argument of rp if the only recipient from Ariana was the subject of the video herself. there's so many heated arguments on this point - would love and deeply appreciate your expert opinion, both on this case, and the rp law interpretation itself. thank you so much in advance!! been here since 30k & I LOVE seeing creators I respect & enjoy growing to this level. you deserve it!!!
Runkle brought this up during his coverage: some of this stuff came out in April, but we're just hearing about it now in July. The only thing he put in Hannah's appeal is the thing about the Jury instruction. Runkle's take is that there's an argument for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, but it likely doesn't rise to that level. What do you think? How bad would it have to be to rise to that level?
Could Ariana be liable if Rachel didn't know the FaceTime was recorded? FaceTime' tells you if someone is recording or takes a screenshot so (if Ariana was even thinking at the time and I don't blame her for not thinking in that moment) isn't it fair to assume on Ariana's end that the recording was consensual?
Emily, my dear, you may need to blank your image when taking phone calls because you have near perfect enunciation for lipreading. I'm hopeless at lipreading yet I got quite a lot of it. 😂 🖤
Reply crew: Answering the question would it impact Hannahs conviction. I feel like the whole crew that were involved should be jailed e.g Alec, Hannah etc. However its only fair for Hannah to have all evidence. Shes not the only person who failed in their aspect on their job. I feel like she was used as a scape goat. To give benefit of the doubt she was stretched so far and if I remember her evidence she was giving out about not being given enough time to do her armory job. Like its a crappy situation everybody was at fault....however its not hannahs fault a person died. Its the production team as a whole. Alec got off....Hannah should get a chance to retrial. You never know what evidence would sway a jury. Could be the smallest of things.
The consent talks started when our boys were about 6 & 3, but our oldest son knew about my SA, we told the youngest a few years later. Our boys know they can always come to us and they do.... our rules for them has always and will always be *Happy, Healthy, Safe, Legal, and Always Consent On Both Sides* . I always thought I would never make it through jury duty because I have the serious flaw of needing to have all scientific, how, whys, wheres, whats. I have no patience, unfortunately. I know it sounds stupid, but I learned long ago when someone feels like A is the *only correct way to think, feel, believe* someone that holds B will inevitably be dogpiled and many other things that can get real hairy, real fast. It's bananas!!!!
My concern with the Karen Reid situation is what happens when this swings the other way. What happens when the next Kerry Morrissey loses a trial to a hung jury and then comes back with jurors saying "well we wanted to convict on two charges, but the instructions weren't clear that we could" or comes up with something like "we'll the jurors wanted to convict but were scared of the backlash so they cause a hung jury instead." I would rather be tried until I died than get convicted because some win at all costs prosecutor started messing with the results of a hung trial after the fact.
Also, if the defense is so worried about the institutions not being clear now, why didn't they bring that up beforehand. They threw a tantrum about the verdict form for charge two. Why didn't they bring up issues with the judges' instructions about filling out any partial verdicts.
I watched one of his police interviews here on UA-cam. He was just awfully eager to throw the blame on Gutierrez-Reed. At least, that's how he came across to me.
Replay crew but having to pause for the night! I'm in the midst of Rachel's Declaration - I recall Ariana's filing said that *she recorded* a bit of the video (with her camera) and sent *that* to Rachel. It does not say she sent the video from Tom to herself, as Rachel asserts. (Pointong this ouy re Rachel's statements on the voracity of Ariana's forensic analysis.)
I feel like Poppal had to have told the lead investigator that the rounds matched. It just seems like they willfully didn’t look at them for plausible deniability.
Replay!! Learned ALOT thank you ! EDB girl this whole suit has me messed up. to be recorded on FT is nuts. Sleeping with your good friends man, while tracking the friends location is wild. Not sure about her blaming the friend. No ma’am. I’ve watched this show over the years. It is impossible not to get caught cheating on this show. Most of the scandals happened after filming. These people live to cheat and tell someone right away.
But, Emily, it is not only the chat that makes this the #1 channel for trials. It is you. You cover these topics and trials with the right amount of empathy, humour, respect and knowledge all in the right places. I can imagine the majority of chat feeling that you are speaking to each one personally.
I also feel like she's speaking to all of us as a team. Whether long time follower or new, we're all a team 😄
@@cindorella1495 Yes, I agree.
@@cindorella1495Such a good way of putting it! Very true! ❤
New title for the stream: Everyone Being Awful All At The Same Time
I honestly thought it would be Baldwin's ego and arrogance to be the focus of his case, not Morrisey's to implode all the cases.
Right? We just took a major side quest 😳 And I hate it for Helyna’s family, but at the same time, if someone with such high powered attorneys on such a high profile case can’t get fairness, how can any of us?
I also was not sure until more evidence was presented if it was even right to charge Baldwin as an actor. I could get on board more as a producer. But as an actor, he should be able to rely on the armorer and AD doing their jobs so that he was never in a position to cause harm. And I disagree with those shouting “cardinal rules of safety” when it comes to a movie set. Even if he was violating some safety rule imposed clearly on actors, which hadn’t been proven in court yet, the armorer was supposed to be there to supervise and stop the behavior. And again, my mind wasn’t made up yet on whether AB should have been held criminally liable. What I remember from HGR’s trial was that there aren’t very clear safety standards in the industry even around armorers, so I don’t recall any clear safety standards for actors to follow. IMO, Hannah and Halls were the two most culpable, and the state erred in giving Halls such a sweetheart deal so quickly. Of all the shenanigans, that deal with Halls makes me the most angry.
@@shkrjam84 Halls got the sweetheart deal because the original prosecutor was, in my opinion , had an agenda to get Baldwin because he is Alec Baldwin. An agenda that Morrissey unfairly got saddled with when she was appointed the special prosecutor. Morrissey most likely would have gone after Halls with the same energy as she did with HGR if there was no deal. I fully believed Morrissey charged Baldwin because she truly believed he was the last failed link in the safety chain. I'm still not convinced she had it out for ACTOR MAN, but I do think she had the win at all cost mentality. I have been saying all along, hubris and arrogance ended Halyna Hutchins and now hubris and arrogance ended this case.
I believe Baldwin should have been charged as a producer as well, but then again I believe all the producers, specifically the one that hired HGR, should have been charged, but that didn't happen.
And I don't think it is the duty of an actor to pull the blanks and check them, but they should be following the rules the armorer establishes to a T. Baldwin didn't even attend the safety meeting. I was hoping that in light of this case concrete, clear rules and regulations would be set for movie/TV productions.
But as for Baldwin, what I think makes him responsible are his own words. I'm paraphrasing here but, he has all sorts of experience with onset weapo ns safety, knows not to point any at anyone and knows blanks are still fatally dangerous. And yet he ignored it all.
I 100% agree that the judge did the right thing. I already respected her before, my respect for her now is just through the roof. And I really, really liked Morrissey, despite her second direct thinly disguised as a re-direct and her frustrated school teacher tone. She proved to be a huge, shady disappointment.
@@marymaclaren9553 totally agree! I think Morrisey believed in the case but got caught up in the win at all costs, and I think she would have definitely gone after Halls if it had been up to her. It’s really sad, I feel for the Hutchins’ family in all this.
@@shkrjam84 And this is me just having too much free time to live inside my head, but seeing Judge Sommer's demeanor, hearing her reasons while sentencing HGR, I think her anger was not only because of the corruption of Morrissey and LE conveniently forgetting (hiding) evidence, but she also believed in the case and now had to throw it all away. I hope for nothing but comfort for Hutchins’ family.
Emily: we can’t stream for four hours
Also Emily: streams for 6 hours
😂😂 you’re my favorite
I love Emily for this fuck it we ride
I absolutely love her so much! She makes me laugh at work even while discussing highly upsetting topics.
Came here to say the same thing! 😂❤
Emily, you have been my comfort voice for a few years now, If Im anxious or depressed, you are perfect calming distraction for my adhd brain. ❤ Thank you
Same
Me too!
Same!!
Ditto
EDB: I can't stream for four hours like I did last night I have meetings today
Me: pauses video to see I'm 2hrs+ into an almost 6 hour stream 😂 💜 I love it
😂😂😂😂😂 2:38:34
Replay crew! Emily you keep so many of us adhd ASD people of a certain age so happy and feeling safe. Thank you 🇮🇪🇮🇪💜
Seconded, at almost 1am! 🇬🇧 🖤
@@GothBoyUKthirded ❤️🩹
Who had "Santa Fe Sheriff's Office files evidence under rando unconnected case number" on their bingo card? Also, who believes that the time they got caught is coincidentally the ONLY time they've ever played "3-case-monte" with evidence?
Who wanted the jury of the karen reed trail to be revealed? I thought we just wanted to know if the all voted not guilty for count 1 en 3 😮
I have watched you since Tati and I am usually in the replay crew…so this comment isn’t “live”. As I am watching in the replay crew, I had to hit pause and leave my first you tube comment (pretty sure it’s my first) after watching you talk about how truly amazing the chat is. And how the chat has made a difference in how we can debate with one another without attacking, and that the chat is what makes this community great. I do agree with you BUT I wanted to tell you it’s because of you. So THANK YOU Emily D Baker!!! Thank you and I appreciate you for making a change in how we consume information. Facts based and always asking questions. As someone that has also served on a jury, I appreciate you taking the time to say…don’t mess with the jury. Those worlds “don’t mess with the jury” need to be taken very seriously and I am so glad you said it. So again, thank you and I appreciate you!
Emily, Thanks! I try to summarize the happenings to my family which doesn’t want to watch & does not appreciate the “details” but still wants updates! It’s hard sometimes!
Me: I’m busy, I’ll just watch the highlights
Also me: watches the entire 6 hours
Thanks for the stream, Emily! I'm catching it as part of the replay crew.
I live in New Mexico and once waited over two years to see a specialist, the only one in the state. More common specialties have a 3-6 month wait list, but it took almost two years for me to get a six-month follow up to one, because the doc’s schedule would be full within an hour or so of the calendar opening each month. It felt like trying to get Taylor Swift tickets! The notion that a doctor in CA could do jury duty and just have someone cover for them is wild to me! Good for California. I hope it’ll be like that here someday!
I think Morrissey did know the rounds were visually similar. She may not have ever looked at them, but I think Hancock told her they had a probelm with those rounds and thats why they purposefully buried them in a different case file.
She claims they would have been "the best evidence" against HG, but they also would have been a defense of sabotage by Kinny. Defense could have raked them on why they were so friendly with Kinny and it could have tainted SZ testimony too.
And thats only AFTER defense informed the Judge of this late discovery and how LE and prosecutor knew these rounds were out there but never tried to get them. It would have been a mess right at the end of HG's trial so Morissey buried it
Quite possibly. But there's a saying called Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." Either way, it looks bad, and calls the actions of Hancock and Morrissey into question.
When I watched Seth Kenney's police interview, I thought he was awfully quick to throw Gutierrez-Reed under the bus. And the detective seemed to be awfully...what's the word I want...deferential to him. It looked weird. Now I'm thinking he was trying very hard to avoid responsiblity.
@@20thcenturyrelic
He’s definitely sus
Tom questioning whether Rachel has a soul or not for suing Ariana while demanding Ariana pays for any monetary damages is (inner Regina George) such a skeeze move.
Thank you for covering the Scandoval of it all!! VPR and Law are my 2 guilty pleasures, so this is perfection!
Us Weekly is indeed claiming Tom fired his attorney and is not suing Ariana. Smartest thing Tom has done lately.
He posted on his IG that he didn’t know what the counterclaim meant and fired him. Like….an attorney is gonna clear every little thing by the client
Wasn’t high on Baldwin’s defense team but Spiro was amazing Friday. He is much better at improvising and coming up with questions on the fly. He put the nail in the coffin for Morrisey. You love to see it.
It was amazing watching him question Cpl. Hancock during the hearing last Friday. She could tell he was getting at something, but she had no clue what it was.
Amazing analysis. To address your comment about being #1 for live coverage. I was watching another LawTube channel but their coverage was so biased, i left the stream and joined your live. Wont make that mistake again. It appears chat members can either become biased or gravitate to those that match their energy and opinion. I enjoy a nuanced review where we can understand the law and facts. A six hour stream, i think i napped through 30 minutes of todays stream. Appreciate you. I feel for the juries. Id want to be annonymous too.
@@dogcrazy25 , welcome!! 💜
Would love to see you breakdown the newest Hayley Paige updates! She got her name back as part of paying a $250k settlement
OMG no way! Oh that has to go on the list. I'm shocked hearing this
Thank you for the PSA... that's why I love this place!
Thank you for covering Scandoval.
On the KR matter- THIS is what happens when so many have lost complete faith in our ‘justice system’…. This shouldn’t surprise anyone that people are raising up in outrage over the this fucked up system. Sucks for the jury thankfully the court will protect them, but the fight can’t stop.
Yeah, this is way more about the town politics than the jurors. Some people are saying things about the jurors out of frustration, but it's really about the sense that the public isn't safe with MSP and Canton PD protecting their friends committing crimes and going after outsiders whether they've done anything or not...
THIS shouldn’t happen at all and people should NOT be ‘fighting’ their opinions to the jury.
@@thebmjdcgroup3910exactly this hurts the system it brings more mistrust no matter what side someone is on they shouldn't be taking it out on the jury
Emily: I can't stream for 4 hours like last night.
Also Emily: stream goes for 6 hours
Me: Sees there's new Karen Read filings..."EDB streams at 11:00am. There's no way these will be covered today."
Also Me, 1 Hour Later Sitting in Work Meeting: *Gets app notification* "Damnit..."
What's up replay crew!!!!
I'm so disappointed in Kari. What was she thinking!!?? I mean she's super intelligent 🤦🏻♀️
Always the best way to spend the day with EBD !!!
thanks for being you!!!!
I've taken so much heat for saying Morrisey plays dirty. And yet here we are.
Same. Said it since Hannah’s trial. I love how EDB is like we didn’t have that info before and now we do…no.
I’m in the same boat. I’ve been saying she was corrupt and solely focused on her own interests (regardless of who is harmed in the process) from the jump, and this only proves it. Her attitude was so off putting to me that it left me wanting her to lose at any cost.
I never liked her, now I rant don't
Replay crew here. That was a wild ride, thank you EDB 💜 from 🇦🇺
Thank you EDB, you are the best.
He FIRED his attorney and withdrew The lawsuit against Ariana!!
When?
Today according to us weekly
@@cherylwilson4507 he posted on IG!! He claims he had no idea his attorney was going to do that
He can’t just take it back. You have to move the court to dismiss it
@@steph3135 withdraw dismiss I think you can do both! Regardless, they both mean he’s dropping it!
I loved the 'looking good, baby!" You and Dr. B are inspirational.
I was such a fan of Morrissey and now I've lost all respect for her. Unacceptable behavior!
Yeah she was feisty and rude but she was a very good attourney...it's a shame and that meltdown on the stand was hard to watch .... although I kind of do believe she was misled by Poppell and Hancock...I mean prosecutors are on a very sticky spot if law enforcement lies to them, and it's ironic but she made the same mistake she was putting people in jail for: Not checking every single bullet...
EDB, you are just the BEST! Thank you so very much for all you ,and your team do for us law nurds! ❤️🇺🇸
Replay crew also! So bummed I missed the Erlinda interview since it was in the member spaces. Any chance you could review it with us on a stream too since 95% of us in the poll on Monday wanted to watch it with you? Thanks for all you do 💜
I imagine it would get claimed by the original producer and that's why it was members only. UA-cam is a bit grabby with copyright nowadays. The interview is on UA-cam but without Emily, unfortunately.
Hannah Gutierrez-Reed and Alec Baldwin were open-and-shut cases; why did the prosecution have to play such stupid games?
not even for Baldwin it mattered where the rounds came from, but because of this procedual mistake made by the prosecutors he is not on trial anymore.
New Jersey is a one party consent state but revenge porn is illegal. I am teaching my granddaughters that you never trust anyone to put you in that position. It’s all good when you think they love you but it can go very wrong.
i may be wrong but didn’t rachel say she was in her house in california? if so, the two party consent still stands and could be considered wiretapping. i only know this because of kim recording taylor during their phone call with kayne during the whole “made that bitch famous” incident.
@@disco.heaven No clue! I don’t watch any of those reality shows
Thank you Emily for all you do!
4:46:11 those poor jurors. This case never had a chance. This is so disrespectful
Right someone can be displeased or disappointed maybe even mad against the state but that should never reach the jury
I'd be more afraid of the Albert's than a blogger. Geez he was scary looking on that last day.
I feel like I need to rewatch the first two days of Baldwin. I feel like maybe there was some merit to the defense accusing them of covering stuff up the whole time from the beginning
I rewatched it! It’s better the second time around 😂
Tbh even all their pre-trial filings did the same thing. I might go and rewatch those as I mostly skimmed.
But they were fighting like heck for MONTHS and I just presumed it was regular defence strategy
Yeah, Kari lied to the court at least once. She said "I didn't know about any of this until today", when she had known about it since Hannah's trial ended. She knew the ammunition was in evidence and she had known that Hancock put a different case number on it. she was present in the meetings.
@@johns1625 I've been wondering if she'll be charged with perjury.
Thank you 🎉❤ for being you x
Can you please cover the pre trial hearings in the Karen Read case? I would love to hear your opinion of the FBI letters and Lally motion to keep the FBI docs out of the case.
I STILL do not understand why the local debate about harassment VS legit first amendment-allowed scrutiny of local community members who may or may not have committed or witnessed a crime was allowed by the judge into the trial while the FBI docs weren't.
I second this!!
Looking at Time 4:30:31 when Emily does a ‘New Filing’ “We’re going to cover this quickly 😂
Looks at length of stream : 5:56:16
Girrrrl! Much love and appreciation for your dedication and humour 🎉😂
The 115'000 dollars needs to be reimbursed by Bravo. It's pocket change to them and a direct repercussion of their show.
My mom always s said treat people the way you want to be treated yourself
The doctors...live in VT, so one of the specialist I worked with was the only one in the state. Rotated with oncall with hospitals out of state. People would die if they weren't able to work.
Replay crew here, just trying to get caught up! Thanks for keeping us up to speed! 💜
its sad you shouldn't go after the jury I would have voted differently myself but I don't think they should be open to harassment
Which side was the one to bring 3 witnesses in that had little to no relationship with John in during closing arguments. We should have a better judge.
I have made it to the end of this “not 4 hour long” stream! EDB is a Goddess!!!
Not me over here getting teared up over EDB talking about the chat and the respect…. But I have to say…. We could not have a space to come together in a respectful manner without you…. You gifted us this space to be genuinely curious about law and to learn and discuss cases where we can be ourselves without being run off for being objective
Damn, I’m just catching up now! Had errands to run yesterday
Catching up on replay crew between trying to work - but I am aghast at what I’ve been hearing today
I have a question, will Morrisey go after Poppell and Hancock to prove they were not honest with her about what the bullets looked like and Hancock's ineptitude on contacting Teske?
Both those women perjured themselves on the stand, who's job is it to go after them? The judge's or the prosecutor's?
I cant stans Hancock, and she got a promotion after HGR trial
My frustration when I started talking about the nine HUNDRED pages of documents of "ish" with my family tonight and my father decides to chime in about the case but then replaces Baldwin with a political candidate instead of staying on (rare from myself) conversation topic....
I absolutely appreciate EDB's coverage of cases, and breakdown of court lingo for the regular person. [edit for comment point]
Dissemble: To make believe with the intent to deceive _or_ to hide under a false appearance.
ReplayCrew💜 - 2:43:44 Exactly, @EDB. I used to *hate* aging. Now, I'm looking forward to 50. I never thought I'd say that. But, the wiry silver and gray? Nah, it's gotta go. Skunk stripe right down the middle is not a good look for me.😂 Here's to getting older and wiser! 🥂
replaying... and just got to the part about possible lawnerds playlists. yes, please!
I feel bad for the jurors but the court caused some of those fears by letting witnesses lie under oath about their harassment cases that haven't been determined yet. The journalist has the right to not be slandered too.
My husband's works as a deputy so I had him listening to the messy young thug stuff, when he proceeded to tell me a story about how disgusting courthouses can be. A deputy and a civilian employee got it on in one of the jury rooms... They are no longer employed with the sheriff's office😂
As to your question to chat about Hannah, I personally believe that G. Pickle has culpability in the death of Mrs. Hutchins. She told Hannah she had to help Sarah with props, not her job! She was not hired as Props Assistant, she was the Armorer. Pickle forced Hannah into a dangerous position to save money. It is her fault that Hannah was rushed consistently in her very important position as Armorer. Hannah was reprimanded for not " helping with props" and her Armorer hours cut, by G. Pickle.
I am so torn on the HG stuff because the fuckery but like she screwed up big time and someone died and I it doesn't feel right for her to just go free....
That's how I feel.
Her job was to Mahe she the gun was safe..
KR jurors have to be worried about being harassed by THE COPS, obviously!!!!!
That’s exactly what it is
They clearly stated who they are scared of. A blogger harassing witnesses.
@@nailjaumbatova4947 my sweet summer child, they are not going to SAY they're afraid of police harassment. Read between the lines and remember what we saw in this case.
@@jumbolumps666😂
Yes, who hasn't been found guilty and I've seen enough to know its most likely getting thrown out. I blame the court for letting it in as a lot of it has been proven to be lies already. Sorry for juries fear but they should be worried more about those witnesses.@@nailjaumbatova4947
Catching the replay. ❤
Kari Kari Kari... you... you silly silly goose 😬
It surprises and also doesn't surprise me that people still need to be told that someone engaging in immoral behavior (e.g., adultery) does not mean we get to strip them of all fundamental rights and protections.
nuanced question here! the argument everyone is getting into over the Ariana lawsuit is regarding the law wording - to my understanding the word "distribute" implies, by definition, third party recipients. many are arguing that the mere sending of the video constitutes "distribution". assuming for this example that Rachel has no evidence & that Ariana did not send the video to any third party and ONLY sent it to Rachel - doesn't that *not* meet the criteria for revenge p? invasion of privacy, yes. but revenge p? I just don't see how they can make the argument of rp if the only recipient from Ariana was the subject of the video herself. there's so many heated arguments on this point - would love and deeply appreciate your expert opinion, both on this case, and the rp law interpretation itself. thank you so much in advance!! been here since 30k & I LOVE seeing creators I respect & enjoy growing to this level. you deserve it!!!
Runkle brought this up during his coverage: some of this stuff came out in April, but we're just hearing about it now in July. The only thing he put in Hannah's appeal is the thing about the Jury instruction.
Runkle's take is that there's an argument for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, but it likely doesn't rise to that level. What do you think? How bad would it have to be to rise to that level?
02:34:30 emily: i have meetings today i cant stream for 4 hours.
Me: looking at how long the stream is on replay 🤔😂 5 hours 56 minutes
Yes to the Chef Penny lawsuit please 😊
EDB! You’re the best!🩵
Seriously. I just love you💓
This is so sad and disheartening (KR) case … EDB thank you for helping with my insomnia… happy Friyay
Could Ariana be liable if Rachel didn't know the FaceTime was recorded? FaceTime' tells you if someone is recording or takes a screenshot so (if Ariana was even thinking at the time and I don't blame her for not thinking in that moment) isn't it fair to assume on Ariana's end that the recording was consensual?
Sandoval better NOT win anything against Ariana. He recorded it. Not Ariana.
Emily, my dear, you may need to blank your image when taking phone calls because you have near perfect enunciation for lipreading. I'm hopeless at lipreading yet I got quite a lot of it. 😂 🖤
I thought the same thing 😂 especially if discussing passwords!!
Reply crew: Answering the question would it impact Hannahs conviction. I feel like the whole crew that were involved should be jailed e.g Alec, Hannah etc. However its only fair for Hannah to have all evidence. Shes not the only person who failed in their aspect on their job. I feel like she was used as a scape goat. To give benefit of the doubt she was stretched so far and if I remember her evidence she was giving out about not being given enough time to do her armory job. Like its a crappy situation everybody was at fault....however its not hannahs fault a person died. Its the production team as a whole. Alec got off....Hannah should get a chance to retrial. You never know what evidence would sway a jury. Could be the smallest of things.
Watching as replay crew is so funny when EDB says “we can’t do another 4 hour stream” and you see it’s nearly 6 hours 😂
Emily, Code Death Star is a need, not a want, simply because you mentioned it lololol
1:25
!
Sick burn, EDB 😉
Odds are good for a self there, John buddy...👋
‼️
The consent talks started when our boys were about 6 & 3, but our oldest son knew about my SA, we told the youngest a few years later. Our boys know they can always come to us and they do.... our rules for them has always and will always be *Happy, Healthy, Safe, Legal, and Always Consent On Both Sides* .
I always thought I would never make it through jury duty because I have the serious flaw of needing to have all scientific, how, whys, wheres, whats. I have no patience, unfortunately.
I know it sounds stupid, but I learned long ago when someone feels like A is the *only correct way to think, feel, believe* someone that holds B will inevitably be dogpiled and many other things that can get real hairy, real fast. It's bananas!!!!
Playlists? That sounds so cool! Especially if you can make one for each trial/case
My concern with the Karen Reid situation is what happens when this swings the other way.
What happens when the next Kerry Morrissey loses a trial to a hung jury and then comes back with jurors saying "well we wanted to convict on two charges, but the instructions weren't clear that we could" or comes up with something like "we'll the jurors wanted to convict but were scared of the backlash so they cause a hung jury instead."
I would rather be tried until I died than get convicted because some win at all costs prosecutor started messing with the results of a hung trial after the fact.
Also, if the defense is so worried about the institutions not being clear now, why didn't they bring that up beforehand. They threw a tantrum about the verdict form for charge two. Why didn't they bring up issues with the judges' instructions about filling out any partial verdicts.
In light of some of this information, HOW is it that the prosecution did not bring charges against Kenney????
I don’t know how Det. Hancock had so many meetings with him and didn’t see through him. He should have been arrested with Hannah
You know, there needs to be evidence, right?
I watched one of his police interviews here on UA-cam. He was just awfully eager to throw the blame on Gutierrez-Reed. At least, that's how he came across to me.
@@charliefoxtrot5001 Stayed tuned... crazier things have happened in this case!
Canone made a good call on the jury list.
27:30 who is cleaning these courthouses. My goodness.
Great shirt❤
Replay crew but having to pause for the night! I'm in the midst of Rachel's Declaration - I recall Ariana's filing said that *she recorded* a bit of the video (with her camera) and sent *that* to Rachel. It does not say she sent the video from Tom to herself, as Rachel asserts. (Pointong this ouy re Rachel's statements on the voracity of Ariana's forensic analysis.)
I feel like Poppal had to have told the lead investigator that the rounds matched. It just seems like they willfully didn’t look at them for plausible deniability.
Replay!! Learned ALOT thank you ! EDB girl this whole suit has me messed up. to be recorded on FT is nuts. Sleeping with your good friends man, while tracking the friends location is wild. Not sure about her blaming the friend. No ma’am. I’ve watched this show over the years. It is impossible not to get caught cheating on this show. Most of the scandals happened after filming. These people live to cheat and tell someone right away.
“…law, another blood sport, but they don’t check your toenails.”
After all the chatting about water polo I have to watch it on the olympics 😊
Wait did we watch the interview? Did I miss it?
All love to bowls but he doesn't seem quite equipped for this case.
1:31:00 - As a former professional bowler (not even kidding!), I can attest to blood in bowling!!! 😂❤
I'm in michigan & I'm drinking ice water!
Me too! Listening and putting up horse hay 🐴🐴
How do I apply for a gifted membership? I would love to be a member!