Dems PANIC Over Trump Immunity Decision
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 лип 2024
- Robby Soave and Max Burns elaborate on what the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity means for Donald Trump and the precedent it sets. Originally aired July 3, 2024. #scotus #immunity
About Rising:
Rising is a weekday morning show with bipartisan hosts that breaks the mold of morning TV by taking viewers inside the halls of Washington power like never before. The show leans into the day's political cycle with cutting edge analysis from DC insiders who can predict what is going to happen. It also sets the day's political agenda by breaking exclusive news with a team of scoop-driven reporters and demanding answers during interviews with the country's most important political newsmakers.
Follow Rising on social media:
Website: Hill.TV
Facebook: HillTVLive/
Instagram: @HillTVLive
Twitter: @HillTVLive
I'm glad you made this video, I can recall when I was homeless and faced with many things in life until $75,000 biweekly began rolling in and my Life went from A homeless nobody to a different person with good things to offer.
Wow, that is huge, how do you earn that much a month? I am 37 years old and have been looking for ways to be successful, please how??
I thank Laura Jennifer Reeves who has always been there to help me with detailed analysis and recommendations that I would not have had access to otherwise.
YES! That is exactly her name (Laura Jennifer Reeves). I saw her interview on CNN News and so many people highly recommended her and her trading skills❤️
I googled her and yes, she has captured my heart. She just got a new client
After raising 325k from trading with her, I bought a new house and car here in the states and also paid for my son's (Oscar) surgery, Glory be to God. Shalom
I'm just here for Robbie. Everyone they pair him with is a clown.
Strongly agree! Max Burns, whenever he's on, always gets in a shot or two against Trump.
They should call the show Robbie and Token
@@woodsmand You got that right, my brother!
I was thinking the very same thing.
We love SCOTUS
Billionaires benefiting from their cases?
@@yishnir84% of the millionaires in the US voted for Biden
This the best SCOTUS in at least decades!
The idea that this guy thinks vague laws with chevron deference allowing administrators to define the actual laws to be followed is somehow "consistent" just shows his ignorance.
These agencies can change what is considered law on a whim without consulting anyone. That's not consistency.
Appears Hunter is shielded and above law. AOC should stick to bartending- she’s a good example of The Peter Principle
You’re just mad AOC has the sand to put you in your place. You’re welcome.
It has been revealed that Cortez is a hired political actor playing the part of a congresswoman of New York's 14th district and was elected thanks to a casting call put out there by the democrats. Back in 2016 Alexandra Rojas executive director of justice democrats put out a call for nominations and they received over 10,000 by 2017 and out of those 10,000 Cortez was chosen by Alexandra Rojas Executive Director of Justice Democrats because they think that she is going to be their new superstar, they think she has star power and that she is the most famous person in congress right now, they even brag about it and think their casting was perfect" which is insane! Coretz's brother Gabriel mailed in her application,” My brother told me that he had sent my nomination in the summer, but I was, like, literally working out of a restaurant, like there's no way" she replied. She is just a face for the camera, a fake, a fraud, a phony baloney pony! FJB!!!
@@johnskalecki9982 Think back! that period is when Evita had just run in theater
This is hilarious….the Tofu crowd loosing their depends over something that has always been implied !
These kids are very soft….and don’t realize the real danger is the quality of each succeeding generation of people!
DIMINISHED QUALITY seems more direct.
They are inclusive 😝🤪🤪🤪🤪
Hmm. The "quality of each succeeding generation"? That sounds familiar. So you're saying there are 'strong people' and 'weak people'? 'Tough people' and 'soft people'? 'Good people' and 'bad people'? 'Good blood' and 'bad blood', huh? Who else talks like this? I'm trying to remember, but for some reason, I can 'Not See' their faces... maybe it's because of the hoods.
Max is out of his mind.
He is an example of how out of touch liberal democrats are with the kind of government American really want.
Thank God for the Supreme Court or civil liberties would be over in this country.
THe dude thinks there is not enough regulation by unelected officials. He's done!
He's a great example of what liberal democrats really believe.
Imagine a president who thought he could do whatever he wanted, like unilaterally canceling half $1 trillion of student loan debt and adding that to the national debt that all taxpaying Americans will have to repay?
Or unilaterally choosing to not enforce immigration law and allow over 5 million illegal immigrants in three years?
Yeah, we really need to be cognizant of the threat of a future president who doesn’t respect limits
11 million not 5
They did not expand any laws. They read the law. You need to do your research. The precedent was not set by Supreme Court.
A outlets months ago we were supposed to trust the courts and respect these decisions wow what happened between then and now
Feelings hurt
Yep. Merchan was biased but were supposed to say its ok
Amber and Robbie are the only reason why I watch, I think Jessica pairs well with both so go find another one like her.
There is not a business owner in the world that thinks the regulations from administrators are a good thing. This guy is too much.
BRO who knows for sure if the supreme court is popular or not. Ive never been polled on it.
Hmm. That's the 'Anecdotal Fallacy'. American's views on all the issues the court has been ruling on are very well documented, as are their views on the court...
@@yishnir just the ones with the biggest mouths. 50% of Us doesn't even vote.
@Jerry-rg8mx Hmm. That's 'still' the Anecdotal Fallacy, but even more vague.
@@yishnir could just as easily be the anecdotal fallacy you perceive.
@Jerry-rg8mx Hmm. If I were talking about 'my feelings' based on 'people I meet or associate with'... but polls are literally the opposite of anecdotal data.
I don't agree with a few opinions on Max Burns but at least he makes common sense arguments. This is the person to counter Robbie. Robbie is the adult on this channel.
"Time to overthrow the Supreme Court because they don't agree with me!" 😂😂😂😂
Yes, dude, Congress has a 13% approval rating while the Supreme Court’s is 40% so LOL at just spitting lies.
Justices are not as unpopular as you think.
They do realize this ruling applies to all presidents. Historically, this was the way all former presidents have been treated. The only reason they are upset is that it might help Trump.
Democrats opened the Pandora's box of selective partisan opponent prosecution.
The supreme court had to do what it could to close that box a bit.
That’s why there’s no more faith in organizations like the hill, the immunity from prosecution is for all presidents, and the supreme court, with only upholding existing constitutional law, they did not base their decision on personalities or individuals. It was based is always based on law, they give opinions why they came to those conclusions, but the decisions are based on law existing law.
The Supreme Court should be interpreting and defending the Constitution. This is decision goes against the Constitution.
@@davidkeller6156 Please explain how
@@johngreen3513 He can't. We're just supposed to take his word over that of actual legal scholars.
What about the financial decisions with other countries that you did while you were a vice president huh
That's it. I'm just not watching any segment with Max Burns in it. He's so worried that Trump might be able to support supreme court justices? Why isn't he worried about Biden putting , say, Kamala Harris on the supreme court? I've always watched the Hill because they are at least somewhat neutral and objective.
Where is it written that no man is above the law?... just asking 😮
Well, then why isn't Joe B charged for his crimes if nobody is above the law?
What crimes?
@@LikeLikeLikeLikeLiBiden with classified documents would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, "Elderly man with a Poor Memory."
Privilege is not being prosecuted for a CRIME for mental decline, yet the ability to run the USA
@@tammyc2852 blah blah blah. Next time just state the charge. You act like I care sooo much. What the F is on your biscuit Tammy butter or jelly?
@@LikeLikeLikeLikeLi
Whoa there Sparky ⚡️ that was kind of dramatic.
A jury would be sensitive to an elderly man with a poor memory.
Biden can use the same laws as that hook
Let's remember when the Democrats had a super majority to codify Roe and Obama ran on Codifying Roe and when he got in office immediately said we have more important things to do. They sold there party out because it's a unifying subject to run on. You solve problems you can't run on them. They had the opportunity and passed so remember the games they play.
Same thing Republicans did with Obamacare; said they were going to repeal it for the better part of a decade, then did nothing when they had majorities after 2016.
We didn’t really feel like it though. You’re welcome for my response by the way -Nancy “the speaker” P
Thank you for posting; you are spot on. Liberals do not want us to think about this or remember it.
If trump in NY is overturned it is due to jury instructions where they were given 3 different options to convict him on.
Where does it say no man is above the law because facts say otherwise.
The problem with the liberal descent on the court is its based on feelings, which are subject to change; and boy howdy do liberal feelings change when their own guy is in the office. The Supreme court said EXACTLY what the Constitution says and anyone who found this ruling out of the ordinary is CLEARLY intellectually dishonest at best, emotionally compromised at worst. If "lawfare" were not a real thing, we wouldn't need these provisions in the Constitution.
No, Chevron was not a good ruling providing predictability. There is uncertainty in the present as the infrastructure of regulatory capture formally in place gets unwound. But in the long term, regulators must answer to congress, and must be subjected to the authority of the courts.
Not all regulators have done a bad job. But the EPA, SEC, FINcen, CDC, FDA, and other agencies have been capricious and arbitrary in regulations and actions that should fall under review by the courts and oversight from congress.
Sorry if corporate Interests in controlling regulators is compromised. Get over it.
O they are not. The dems knew very well what the ruling would be, every president has known they held immunity by the position they held.
Still can't believe you fired you're the best... But, thank you.
Glad that Brianna is free now to speak her mind.
Running the government by the principles of the Constitution is the best government.
Very good points and discussion!!
Thanks boy -Rob
Judges are not there to be popular.
LOL... Based on the OUTCOME: This is a NON-ISSUE.
HAHAHA !!!!!!!HAVENT HEARD ANYTHING FROM THE SQUAD !!!!! IS THESE KARMA ???
Max reminds me of Chaz from freedom tunes
congress is NOT more popular than the supreme court. not sure why he said that
I hate this new guy lol
He's a lot better than Bri or that new woman.
You hate the show… firing Kim, then Katie, and now Bri (and she was 95% shill)
It’s clear what’s going on, the new producers are shitlibs trying to push propaganda. The show has jumped the shark. Robby is a clown, but even he is too good for this show now
Why?
I kinda hope they just keep Robbie and bring on a never ending series of just socialists. Imagine if we got to listen to the psychotic ramblings of a new young communist every week. Barring that Ana Kasparian could be good. Watching her slowly come to terms with reality would be fun.
Trump is not at fault for January 6th
wrong!
@@ShirleeKnott How is he wrong?
@@Patrick-kt5mc if you are asking this question I can't help you. if you really want to know do some research, the truth is out there
@@ShirleeKnott So, you don't know then. That's a round about way of saying it.
@@MrDavee1 wrong I do know it just isn't worth my time with you as I don't believe you'd listen to the truth. if you wanted to know you'd of asked what to goggle to start your research for the truth
Impeachment has gone completely unaddressed in this discussion.
A President faces impeachment for acts the commit as President. Should a President be convicted in an impeachment, their immunity vanishes.
Biden omitted to mention that he has invited seal team 6 to the oval office.
Mr. Garrison's Son ain't making the grade, I'm afraid.
I don't get why this is a bad decision. Presidential immunity was already the case. All the court did was clarify that immunity applies to the President's official acts inside the scope of his executive authority. Official acts outside the scope and unoffical acts are not immune. They returned the case to the district court to determine which of Trump's acts are not immune. To me, that sounds like the way it should be. Am I missing something?
If presidential immunity were so greatly expanded and the President is no longer subject to the rule of law, as Biden said in his remarks, then he should just declare himself King and Hunter crown prince. Why bother going through the motions of any more elections? He has the military to ensure nobody disagrees. King Joseph.
While I don’t agree with the new commentator on most issues, I can definitely respect his ideas. His professionalism allows the listeners to think through his comments and ideas and decide.
Refreshing to have a conversation about politics without emotions dominating.
This guy is subbing for Nareyya??? omg…. keep this guy and replace her. He is a tone more intelligent and can actually have a conversation without his feelings being hurt.
where's brianha?
She got kicked a few weeks back for being an antisemitic psychopath. The replacements they've tried have all been worse until this guy, he's got potential.
dear the hill bri was the wort thing about this network, but almost just as bad her is when you repost videos from earlier in the week and use them as weekend content... it's a sneaky practice we all see right thru
then don’t click on the reposts?
Jealous of bri? Never made it out the trailer park? Typical
@@ryansreaction be nice if they put it in the headline not in the fine print in the description.........
@@mouthrunner1082 - they do it every weekend, on the days they don’t broadcast
Thanks mouth -Robby
I’ve enjoyed Max, seems like a great cohost.
Same law will protect you!! But all those crimes while vice president... karma she's coming
This is a five alarm fire that Joe started all by himself. He can put it out immediately by stepping down. He surely knows we deserve better than a mentally failing guy. All due respect and I have a lot form him, but his finest hour left without him Thursday night.
Wouldn't the SC decision help Biden, too?
No because Biden took classified documents as a senator
Get Jen back here! I'm tired of watching Dennis the Menace debate Doogie Howser.
Briahna was twisted and fiendishly clever, which made her easy to despise. But this guy, Max, is simply clueless and facile, and you almost have to feel sorry for him.
T’s investment in judges just paid for itself… RFK JR 2024, hope not fear…
Please disvharge this ladybiy and bring back Briahanna
Does not just protect trump but Biden
like the devil, he never tells the truth
There is exactly zero chance of confirming a new Supreme Court Justice between now and November.
There is NO current vacancy on the court.
@@danporath536 Did you not hear the part of this video suggesting this possibility if Sotomayor were to step down so that Biden could nominate a liberal Justice?
@@toditron Sotomayor is a liberal judge,and your point is?
@@smokeyrobin7881their point is covered up by a hat apparently. What person doesn’t know Sotomayor is a liberal?
unless a SCALIA
Good job, Robby.
You thing you are Mr Biden
Who is this Ryan Grim 2.0…yuck
Trump president 2024 and King 2028
I disdain guys like Max who fluently spew obvious falsehoods that wilt instantly under minimal scrutiny.
The soy twins are back
Robbi is a man's man! /sarc
Max is a typical Lefty, “Rules for Rep but not for Demsl.
Your new Leftist is such an obvious liar. At least I believed Briana was telling the truth when she spoke.
Brie was confused if anything but I think she believed what she said
😂😂😂
A h juice
Not sure why people are surprised.
Why won't people see that the very office of the president was a horrible, no good idea. From the beginning, their has been an appetite for a king among many Americans. We've been building up executive power in various ways for decades & decades. Might as well make the toxic thing official.
The worst thing about having a president though, is having so much power, so much importance & vital significance, in the hands of a single person, someone who might be terrible, but even if "good" is a dangerous bottleneck.
Here's a suggestion. Amend the Constitution in a major way. Have each office of the cabinet, as well as the Attorney General, independently elected. Many states have already moved away from at least a governor appointed AG. Those individuals will have authority over their respective cabinet domains. We massively downgrade the president to be a far less powerful or significant head of state, a representative, a communicating talking head. Perhaps the only actual political roles the president should have are to be a policy unifier for their cabinet, to convey important decisions to the American people & the world, & to be the decision maker when the cabinet is divided.
The role of commander-in-chief could also be a separate elected position, with current military rank being disqualifying (to prevent someone popular with the military staging a coup). That commander-in-chief would manage the day to day & immediately actionable military actions, but be ultimately accountable to the people. Ideally, an adequately informed populace (not Congress or any elected officials) would have the ultimate broad level military decision making power through referenda.
It's ridiculous to have something we *call* a democracy, but still indulge our animal instinct to want a single biggest, strongest, most important ape calling most of the shots.
The office of the president has always been a ticking time bomb. & lest we forget, every single president since (at least) FDR has been a war criminal.
I read a couple sentences boy. You’re welcome!!
Bad idea. We need a single cohesive strategy and in times of crisis we don't have time for committee meetings. Just reign in the executive power abdicated by the legislature over the last twenty years.
Seriously, you want to hold elections about troop movements? Get out of here.
@@sn5806 Not about troop movements, but broad, overall military policy, yes, absolutely.
Protecting individual liberties, freedoms, & whatever semblance we still have of democratic principles, is worth dismantling the presidency.
Keeping the *broad* use of the military in the hands of an adequately informed population would have the effect of reducing excessive warfare throughout the world, & it would necessitate reforming national security so that it can't be used to hide almost anything from the American public. Only things like our military technology, our tactics & strategies, maybe our training methods, & our troop movements & operations (where otherwise they'd be in danger) should be within the realm of national security.
Anything else, esp stuff that only makes the US look bad, stuff a majority of Americans would not approve of, should not be kept secret. The commander-in-chief & the leading generals should be in charge of on-site military operations, tactics, etc. The decisions on location, the specific actions.
Whether our military gets involved in a conflict, or is deployed to other countries for anything else than staffing military bases & such, that should be something the American public has to approve.
When something happens that requires an immediate military response, that's something an elected commander-in-chief can do. Anything prolonged, any broad military policy (as opposed to tactics or operations), these should be approved by a majority of Americans.
If the commander-in-chief, which would be a far narrower role than president, uses the military in a way that's condemned by a majority of Americans, there should be a straightforward & easier process for (fairly) quickly removing & replacing them.
I understand your concerns, but I do think you strawmanned what I said a bit. & those same concerns would have led to a very different Constitution. A nation willing to compromise & erode its values, out of fear of loss of military strength or dominance, is going to lose all its original values over time.
The US would be more of a military titan if we were a military dictatorship. No pesky Congress or public approval to worry about, so much easier. Should we do that? At that point, what would be worth defending?
@@MarcVL1234 This is going to be a nightmare to read. No indentation. No spacing.
You can add line breaks by holding shift and pressing enter.
Like this.
@@sn5806 You're not wrong. It was lazy of me. Spacing added. Not going to try to do anything about arguable run-on or long sentences though.
They need 2 take it away
This isn’t the Supreme Court. It’s the MAGA court. And this comes from a Republican voter.
it also comes from someone who is NOT an attorney and clueless about the US judicial system which has historically encouraged ACTIVIST judges unlike the British legal system
@davidkeller6156 please explain how
@@johngreen3513 He can't. fee fees hurt. Orange man bad. must. stop. angry. tweets. ARRRRGH
If you want to vote for the narcissistic, seditious, wannabe dictator, orange man, be my guest. I watched every minute of the Jan.6 hearings and heard from some of his closest advisors on just how he behaved. His own people saying he purposely lied about election fraud. His own people saying he planned it from as early as July. His own people saying he wanted the military to confiscate voting machines. I watched his rambling, incoherent speeches. Seen how he increased the deficit more Ethan any other president in history. Seen him lie, time after time. Heard what he’s said about people in the military being suckers. Heard his disgusting behavior with women.
I’ve voted Republican since Reagan. The Republican Party has turned into a cult of personality. I’m done with it and I’m not the only one.
@@ktermalkut8332 You’re right, I’m not a lawyer, but I listen to lawyers discuss what is going on with the Supreme Court.
The worst decision in US history. If there was a way to fire a judge in the Supreme Court. $6mil in gifts and still ha e a job is disgusting.
💙Dems, now is the time to rise up and unite against tyranny & fascism, which is exactly what this is. There can be no complacency or wavering. The only issue on the ballot is Democracy. We must win Pres, House, & Senate. Impeach Alito & Thomas, appoint 2, & repeal the immunity, Chevron & other rulings against the people. Vote blue! 💙💙💙
Two white guys in suits wearing glasses…… let’s get a different cohost for Robbie
You want a didn't earn it co-host? Didn't they fire the last one because she said SA against certain races didn't count? Maybe didn't earn it hires are incompetent.
How about Chuck Norris?
@@Patrick-kt5mc - I’m in
America I think the Democrats are cowards. I will say with my last vote. I will vote for a democracy. I believe if the dictator wins this election black America vote will be no more back to the beginning for us😢
don't drink the MSM koolaid! vote after researching what you have been or are being fed
@@ktermalkut8332 Try researching project 25
Oh, brother! if only you could understand how mind-controlled we all have been by the Mockingbird corporate media.
Bring back Bre Bre!
Waaaaaaaaaaaa!