Tennis Hard Court Drama 2020 | Part 07 | This is Baloney! I Hope You Get Fined For This!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 тра 2020
- Drama that occurred during the early 2020 hardcourt swing. Featuring Maria Sakkari, Kristina Mladenovic, Elena Rybakina, Petra Martic, Jelena Ostapenko, CoCo Vandeweghe, Ons Jabeur, Ellen Perez, Barbora Strycova and more. Enjoy 🎾
Second channel : / @tennisadvocatesunited
Twitter : / tennis_advocate
Instagram : / tennisadvocate
Facebook : / tennisadvocate
Merch store: teespring.com/stores/tennis-a...
#Tennis
#TennisDrama
#TennisArguments - Спорт
This series is the best tennis compilation ever created. Many thanks to you.
agreed
I don’t know why I’m watching arguments on UA-cam. I’m already married.
Amen
Warm up
Stay brave. 💪
14:45 i think if you are strong enough to break a racquet over your thigh you should have a code violation removed
Perez is actually right here... Line umpire definitely made a call before she hit the shot
the problem here is that some times, the chair umpire simply cannot remember if the call came before or after the shot was made. They have to watch the other player/s motion for a challenge, indicate a challenge on her device, then call it in, then wait for the review.
A simple remedy would be to just allow them to view a replay, it takes less time than having players argue it.
Nah bro, Perez hit the ball out.
No she wasnt at all
As a tennis umpire myself I can confirm. She is absolutely right it should have been called a hindrance, and the point should have been replayed
Hass on that match: "you're sooo wrong agaaain..." I don't like her. Seems like she is acting, playing her role.
Some of these umpires need to be held accountable, as well as linesmen/women.
You can tell that the female commentator during the cat clip has owned or owns cats. She knew instantly that it was a cry for help, as the cat was probably stuck somewhere.
T1mTenn1s I care. Also, dayasotical's comment got 32 likes while yours got zero, so that's a good indication of how many people care.
@@hamzaabbaszaidi8788 78 now and i cant see the comment you referring for
@@razoo911 I think the comment I referred to was somebody saying "nobody cares".
2:30 the umpire is becoming infamous for making wrong judgments
That’s why she is. It judging at wimbkedon
I like how Sakkari reacts, that's probably how I would react. Just make like a, 'Huh. Okay.' face.
I never thought I would be watching hours of tennis drama videos, but here I am. These are hilarious!
Martic is a gem. Wonderful sportsmanship. I'm a fan.
Her honesty is amazing, especially on that point
14:43 goodness that is strong stuff 😂
Pathetic insecure male loser.
@@zafferung4440 I literally complemented on her strength, but whatever you say, boomer.
Yeah, strong indeed. Reminds me of Stan Wawrinka xD
I tried to break my Head Youtek Prestige racquet by that way... but it is impossible... jajajaja.
@@hamaja18 ,If you were boiling like she was you would probably make it.
12:30 How is he standing like that ? 😂😂
flexible dude?
@@lobomalsano its a joke
Great honesty from Martic and the doubles team Dabrowski/Zhang. Sportsmanship is in short supply in womens tennis. This is needed.
@@wonderlandian8465 Im on truth serum, pls enjoy :)
ua-cam.com/play/PLJ_6YpUob3JSzMkE8SyuYwWEIBt6IqSuD.html
I was going to say the same thing, you rarely see sportsmanship on the women's tour. Sure, a few are friendly at the net but never during the actual match.
I love Barbora Strycova, will miss her when she retires. She's not nasty at all just eccentric and well liked on the circuit. Funny little thing. Very friendly off court. She's just teamed up with Halep for the doubles in Prague. With their styles that should be very entertaining. Two of my favorite players 😍
14:45 Actually quite impressive from Vandeweghe
🤣🤣🤣🤣she HULKED up and fractured that racket.....!
She’s super aggressive!
8:27 Aww that cat on the court was cute! Never seen that iguana either but I think it's funny when animals make it onto the fields
Perez: Do not tell me one more time "I hit it and she called it out"
And let me tell you for the 7th time she called it out and I hit it.
Keep going with these wonderful entertaining videos!!
2:09 decision on perez was absolutely joke.
omg how the hell did coco break that racquet? shes so strong!
Ikr, its so tough to do that
@@santiagomunez341 its really not hard, its the angle you hit the ground with it.
@@davidca96 she was breaking it over the knee, wasnt she?
She was boiling,that's how,she probably wanted to break that racquet on the umpire's head 🤣
well, she looks like she could kick the butt of some scrawnier guy imo lol...that woman is powerfull!
Petra Martic is such a good sport, almost* always has been 👍.
*Martic V Mladenovic @Wuhan Open 2019.
@T1mTenn1s lol
I agree that Martic showed a great sportsmanship here, but didn't she flipped off Mladenovic at Wuhan Open?
@@casek7531 yiiiiiikes yeah, you're right. I didn't know that. Time to edit my comment.
@@casek7531 This may have been her way of apologizing plus why make a permanent enemy in Mlad by standing by on this call?
@@casek7531 At least she's fair in game. I'd rather someone not take a break point and flip someone off.
13:47 "Okay, yeah.. right.. now take this code violation" lmaoo
haha, who's in power ;)
@@Walkman0007 ,And then she broke the racquet got a point penalty and lost the match in the end,she probably wanted to kill him 🤣
First, Vandeweghe had a good argument as the call & her swing were nearly simultaneous. Second, she uses no bad language or personal insults. Only says, "I hope you get fined for this" & gets a violation when she done & walking to playing position. WTF ?? If Serena Williams were treated like this there were several GS events she would have racked up all the violations to be disqualified on a single dispute.
Chuck Smith factsss🙌🏽
@@1158scott If the hit and call were nearly simultaneous, the call would've had no bearing on her swing; so she really didn't have a good argument.
Teichmann went full Mladenovic in that match against Ostapenko. We got a "come on" in at least 3 languages.
Actually is Teichmann who speaks a lot of language during the match normally (she speaks 6 languages)
LMAAOO when ostapenko saw the cat
I love Maria Sakkari, but NO ONE messes with umpire Nouni and his great voice haha
He's the best. My mom calls him "the kindergarten teacher" because of the soothingly firm way he handles the players. :)
7:49 the face tells you everything lol
I love it when the opponent correctly says to replay the point when the umpire is wrong. Wish we saw that more with the ATP side of the sport.
Literally my favorite series
2:00 Nice ambient and sky to play tennis.
Seems like in order to be an umpire you have to be a professional gaslighter
I guess you could say she argued in the BLINKOVAn eye!! *Ba dum tsss*
the troublemakers are always the same people
both judges and players
martic and zheng both such good sportsman. also wozzie in us open gave a replay to madison keys. i dont remember the year
I am happy to see there are also some good examples of sportsmanship like Petra Martic. 👍
I'm sorry, but Kristina's death stare is the funniest thing. I need a screenshot of that printed on top of where I keep my secret stash of chocolate.
I think Vandeweghe watched a few Troicki matches 🤣
how did the cat get in there lol
Is it legit to say “idiot” to the umpire without getting a penalty?
I find it so bad and it happens so often
I think it depends on the umpire's interpretation of the rules. In the section on verbal abuse, the Official Grand Slam Rulebook states:
*For the purposes of this Rule, verbal abuse is defined as a statement about an
official, opponent, sponsor, spectator or other person that implies dishonesty or is
derogatory, insulting or otherwise abusive*
So if you called the umpire "corrupt" or "a liar", that's an indisputable violation, as you're implying dishonesty. But mild insults like "idiot" are debatable I guess, as the umpire may or may not deem it offensive enough to justify a violation of the rule.
"i literally missed it on purpose because she called it out"
yeah sure you did
k m she clearly did. That happens all the time. Have you ever fucking watched tennis before?
@@JamesFrew1 so your saying after it was called out before she hit it (which im not denying) she then proceeded to deliberately hit the ball long? why would she do this and what would she gain?
all i was doing was pointing out she had a floored argument so maybe you have never fucking watched tennis before
k m I’ve covered tennis and am a former player.
The entire point of this highlight is that the umpire was wrong. Once you hear ‘out’ players often ‘dump’ the ball, which is taking your frustration out, or hitting in the direction of a ballperson. That’s what happened here. She heard out, and she didn’t play the ball, she just hit it. She was correct however you look at it-those are the rules.
@@JamesFrew1 I agree. That is something I could do. If I call a ball out, I could just blast it back ten feet out.
Well, maybe she was looking for other arguments to make because the factual one, that linesman called it out before she hit the shot did not hold.
Can someone please explain in other words what a foul shot is? I made exactly the same expression Sakkari did when this M. Čičak attempted to define it.
It means the ball made contact with the racket twice in the same shot.
1:38 Haas: That´s not correct.Haha. 1)linesman called out before Wang hit ball. 2)Wang ball was definitly good.
Yeah how on earth could she think she won the point ?? Call was way before she hit the ball, and also she hit it back in
This! Her complaining made no sense. Even if the out call *had* been after Wang hit... Wang hit the ball back into play... so it makes no difference, it's still a replay.
9:17 I think that's a feed me meow from the cat lol
Where do you get these clips from
When it said baloney I knew it was Coco
The umpire was right on that decision👍you can clearly see 0:46 it did bounce twice after she swings her racket upwards!
I'm not 100% sure about this, but I'm pretty sure that in tennis you can hit the ball multiple times as long as it's in one motion. That is indeed a rule. However, I think the umpire was saying that she did two motions and the second motion was trying to correct the miss hit of the first motion.
Hi, the umpire was right and wrong at the same time. She was right because the ball clearly bounced twice. But, she was wrong in a way that she said that Sakkari had a foul shot that did not occur. Fortunately, she gave the point to Cornet, what was the right thing.
@Einars Dubrovskis This is not the bounce on the floor which is contested but those on the raquet , if you look right , the ball hit twice the raquet of sakkari
@Einars Dubrovskis are you drugs or something😂 you can clearly seen it bounced twice even at 0.25, I suppose your not that transparent at all then!🤣
I am not a fan of Vandeweghe,but she is right here 🙄
Petra Martin and Shuai Zhang are very Good sport.
I normally think tennis players whine way too much but a lot of these calls by the umpires were just plain wrong.
I love both Martic and Rybakina, some of the mild mannered players on tour (except for that Martic finger when she played Yastremska)
wait racket abuse is a thing to get a code violation on?
2:01 amazing sunset 🌇
I’m still struggling over that first one between Cornet and Sakkari. What was the issue because to me everything looked fine.
If you look closely at the slow motion replay, you can see that Sakkari intentionally hit the ball twice. As the umpire explained, the only time it is legal to make contact with the ball twice on the same shot is if it's done inadvertently with the one swing. But if you intentionally make contact twice in order to correct the ball's trajectory, as Sakkari did, that's a foul shot.
Jabeur and Siniakova game. The umpire was so wrong.
What a stupid call regarding foul shot..but Marija Cicak is always SO smart..on the other side, unbelievable sportmanship from Petra Martic!
Theres something about angry tennis players that makes me really happy 🤣
i’m confused about the sakkari vs cornet situation... could someone explain? is it because sakkari lifted up her racket to hit the ball twice?
The ball bounced a second time before Sakkari hit it, which is illegal. The umpire was stating that the way Sakkari controlled her racket to hit the ball was proof that she didn't get to it on time, and Maria couldn't argue with her because she knew the umpire was right.
Yes, Cicak ruled it a foul shot as sakkari made (in cicak’s opinion) two distinctly different motions to contact the ball (thus why it the ball hit racquet twice before going over). As Cicak explains, it would’ve been a legal shot if sakkari had only made one continuous motion to hit the ball (even if the racquet struck the ball twice).
@@dayostical The ball didn't bounce twice - Sakkari hit the ball twice in one stroke, and she modified her stroke after the first hit, then rolled it off the racket to avoid the ball going out, which is an illegal shot. (If she hadn't modified her stroke and accidentally hit the ball twice, it would have been ok)
7:55 LOL
2:28 Umpire 😍😍😍
7:59 lol
Mlad and the death stare
9:39 cat stuck underneath a Jaguar
I saw ons I clicked 😂
It's actually funny how most of the videos have the same players and same umpires... always!!
Points should be replayed - no judgement calls.
The person called out while she was hitting it
7:00 The umpire would never admit he made a mistake even it was so obvious...🙄
Sometimes you can spot an American a mile away lol
Haha vandeweghe is COCOnuts
Jack C i knew right when she began arguing that she was american just so annoying lol
@@tranquilizer3060 ,Yeah you can say that she was kind of a little angry there nothing much 🤣
why doesnt she want to replay de point at 1:04? the return was in wtf
I don't get why in tennis - if they can use hawk eye technology to determine if a challenged ball was out or not - they can't do a quick video check after a successful challenge overrule to determine if the next shot was made before or after the linejudge called it out. Why are they just holding on their "no that's not how I saw it. It's my decision" here..?
Not the first time this Abdel-Azim guy has turned up in these videos.
8:48 hahahahahahahahahahahaha
yo not that ive done it but it cant be easy to just snap the racket on your knee like that
Paused after the first one. Idk what everyone else is seeing... that was definitely one motion.
lol perez did not miss that on purpose. These are pros! With $ and points on the line you just put it back into the court and let the umpires do their job.
Coco.... is a powerful woman!
Shut up Coco. Only Judge Judy can pull off using the term 'baloney'.
But she’s right!
I dont quite understand the first one?
The umpire called the equivalent of a double hit - aka "not up" because of the scooping motion.
basically Sakkari hit twice the ball involuntary and apparently the umpire thought it wasn't allowed but I read somewhere that, if it's not voluntar, you keep playing the point
Gosh its been so long since i've played but. A deliberate double hit is deemed as illegal right? So the umpire considered this as deliberate because of the scooping motion? Is that deliberat ethough?
She hit it flat first and then she scooped it upwards hitting it again?
@@Adrianisasianwbu I wouldn't have called it, as it looked like one motion. Even Cornet was confused, so a call like that really wasn't all that necessary, but that's just from my view.
Great call by the ump on the first one. Tough call to make in live action, but IMO absolutely correct.
3:44 this judge needs a raise from taking a crap load of shit lol
Kjendlie was wrong. There was no hindrance. Jabeur should've got the point.
Omg I feel so sad for that cat. I wish someone would save it and send it to me, I will adopt it :(
Coco isnt a fav player of mine but she was completely in the right here
Anto Galbraith not to be rude but i personally think she wasn’t? and on top of that she was just so disrespectful to the umpire which didn’t help her case
@@kaylaosorio7730 aw you think so? I honestly thought she was right.
Imagine how much lezzing out goes on behind closed doors with these girls!
No Yulia!!! Did she take this swing of tournaments off?
I don't get tennis. The ball is spherical. It touches the court initially--in bounds or out--at a single point on that sphere. If that point is out of bounds, the ball is "Out" and play ends. By the time some part of the the ball deforms enough to touch the line (as Real Bounce, or Hawkeye or any of the line monitoring systems show) the ball has been in contact with the court out of bounds for that entire time. Shouldn't the call be Out?
I think you're making this more complicated than it needs to be. If any part of the ball touches the line then the ball is good...whether or not the touch is the result of the ball deforming is immaterial--you consider the entire ball/sphere and not the pin point of first contact.
@@bobcrane4801 Could also just look at it as a bird's eye view - when the ball touches the court, if any part of said ball is over top of the line, whether it's touching or not, it's in.
Just here to thank everyone in the comment section. Y'all are so hilarious and witty with the comments. I'm crying!! 🤣🤣🤣 Have a great day y'all. 👊🏾
Watson 😍😍😍
0:47 -- Yeah umpire (for once lol) was in the right on that one.
1:08 - Pains me to say since I'm not a Wang fan, but yeah Haas hit that ball out, shouldn't have been called in.
2:16 - That ball was definitely out, and the "eagle eye" shit later showed it WAY too much on the line than it was in actuality. 100% on Perez and Haas's side here.
Sakkari,Vandeweghe,Ostapenko....the usual suspects XD
12:59 i hate the way this umpire is always like laughing at the players in this subtle way, what a deuche... and he was wrong here too...
Why does Sakkari look so much like Rey??
7:49 Stare of disgust from Kiki
14:35 that’s a real head
Coco is the only player I don't mind having tantrums. She really goes for it lol
Why is Haas, Sakkari?
Think the rule needs to be changed regarding giving points on challenges that overturn calls, should be point replayed every time
I think its fine the way it is, you know one point can make a difference in tennis match. And it is very hard to win a point/hit a winner.
Ricc Lee I think it’s usually too close to call and it’s not something you particularly look out for
@@elliotthomas8346 Umpires are only meant to award the point if there is no doubt at all about the timing of the call (relative to the timing of contact). It's an issue with improper enforcement.
Gregory C it’s such a difficult thing to judge imo but they seem to award points quite often
You can get a point penalty for snapping your racquet? She didn’t even smash it on the ground or anywhere… Wow
Lets be honest. Some calls are brutal.
Co Co 😍😍
even though I think that most Australian players have terrible attitudes, Perez has a point here. the shot was called out and then she returned the ball. whether she intended to hit the ball long or not is not the point
Wow generalisation much? Outside of Kyrgios and Tomic the majority of Australian players have GREAT attitudes!
@@kalemarnica32 Hewitt was another obnoxious prick
@@kalemarnica32 Lleyton hewitt also, I wasn't just talking about the players, I was talking about supporters too. I remember watching a match, it must have been Hewitt playing Radek Stepanek, and Hewitt came back from 0-2 down in sets to level at 2-2. and the crowd started chanting we're gonna win it 3-2. just completely unnecessary and disrespectful.
@@poplova Sorry but your comment specially stated tennis players only. And come on, all all tennis crowds are bias towards there own player at all the tournaments, just look at the french at Roland Garros who are we kidding here?
@@kalemarnica32 Don't get me wrong. there's bias, and then there's just pure disrespect. of course we all have our favourites
Tennis players think they own crowd, umpires. They are so fragile and soft. As a sports fan, i pity tennis players
Ohh CoCo 😂girl trying to act gangsta... stop it,please