No you could see in his face, he was considering something in his little baby head. Maybe a "but if you try me on something tho, it's on. Otherwise, I'm glad that you like the grahamy things too 🤗🧐." 2:54
Maybe the colors of the Stuffed animals/their shirts affected it? Was there some kind of control/switching of shirt colors? wtf kind of experiment is this???!!
As amazing as this experiment seems, I think it is somewhat reductionist. We cannot reduce the complexity of a human to simple tasks such as picking a bear. It's deeper than that.
Yes you are right. We cannot reduce the complexity of a human baby to simple tasks such as picking a bear. We should make a baby solve quadratic equation. That would be a right challenge for a baby, isn’t it?
I'll never forget the story I read about a father singing to his daughter when she was in the womb. WHENEVER he would sing she was stopped moving and her mother's stomach. So when his daughter was born came out screaming at the top of her lungs and refusing to eat. When her father starts singing to her she became calm and begin to eat. Our children learn while they're in the womb. Their physical perception of right and wrong is reinforced physically when they're born.
I don't think babies care about language, or even looks. I'm Mexican (light brown skin, black hair) but I'm also part Dutch and live in the Netherlands now. Here, a cousin of mine has a baby boy who's blonde and has blue eyes. For fun I tend to speak in Spanish to the baby and he doesn't care, he also doesn't seem to even be aware that I look different. As long as I'm nice to him,he doesn't care I don't look like his parents or like him. I think this is a better example applied to real life...
Right of the bat, few questions about the good bunny / bad bunny experiment: -Do babies have a colour bias that was accounted for? -Do babies have a reach out bias, meaning they might use their visual bias to reach out more on one side than other, which was accounted for? -Was there an unconscious bias in the presenter possibly reaching out further with the right hand to present the good bunny closer to the baby? Interesting studies, though!
I am black and I honestly like the orange cat just because the colors are bright and I like orange. I don't think the babies are racist I just think their like me. I like the blue dog and the orange cat and so do the babies.
Scientists once again "proving" common sense. "Babies like those who are like them?" How about babies, (and anyone with common sense) likes those who are helpful and protective (green bunny) rather than those who express violence and opposition (orange bunny) It's called survival.
Racism is ingrained in our DNA for good reason. For 200,000 years we lived in small groups spread over the world. Each group looked different according to their geographical location. When they encountered people of a different race, this meant people from far away were likely invading their territory. It is easy to unlearn..but the initial response will always exist
We all have innate good and bad attributes. It depends which ones get to be exemplified more in our character. That's where nurturing comes into place.
There are many variables when it comes to things like this, but we tend to simplify things and ignore the deeper aspects because it sounds better to us. It’s unfortunate, but so true.
I believe i was born prejudiced. I remember from a very young age discriminating. Now ive changed alot as ive grown but i do believe people are born somewhat prejudiced.
I think this was more of a baby being a baby than the baby actually choosing based on some innate bias... the babies always went for the item on the left.
Wow the puppet one is really stupid. One acts violently the other acts nice. It didn't matter which liked which at all. The baby just didn't like the mean puppet.
She slightly touched on the correlation to how special interest groups form. That was interesting makes me think this barely scratches the surface of what they observe
We all are born this way, we all have a base-level prejudice, ignorance, hell even racism call it what you will. The racism we think of is the hatred aspect, the hatred part is more or less taught or exposed to us, from parents, organizations, religions, etc. When that happens, it’s no longer what the video suggests, this is an outside influence that makes people behave or think a certain way, so the saying, “No baby is born racist” is...kinda true, but kinda wrong as well.
While there as being plenty of writings on how children acquire their biases and their general knowledge (Alport to Piaget and skinner) we need to place that discussion
On the back burner. We need to have candid discussion on why adults harbor such dislike for other for basically superficial reasons. Until then we’re only dodging the issue. An issue we much solve.
also baby touched the bunny doesn't conclude "choose bunny" as baby in video screamed or made noise perhaps to stop the bunny from coming closer with baby's hand 0:44
i felt like there’s too much what ifs in this experiment bc it’s not that fair. There could be many other reasons why they chose what they chose. They should have mb not put any shirt on the animals and make the story more simple as the child might not even understand what’s going on
What if the baby was 2 young 2 understand that the blue puppy was mean?? They just looked at the puppet show blankley, I don't even think they understood. This proves nothing
Absolutely! There is a predisposition towards a certain feeling. However, those tests are inconclusive and stupid. There could be something bad inside the box which would reverse the situation. The "mean" bunny might actually be the heroic bunny. The "good" bunny may be a frickin' fool! The children are just going on the APPEARANCE of the bunnies which means they are fools too. They're being made out to be fools.
People who are different from you will always be viewed as a threat or a curiosity to some degree. It's built into our instinctual fight-or-flight response. It's evidenced by babies, of all races, showing some fear, confusion, or anxiety at pictures of people who are not their mother or who look anything unlike thier mother or father. You could show a white baby a picture of a black man and get some expression of fear, curiosity, or confusion. But you could also show that baby a picture of a giraffe, or snail, or airplane, and get a similar response. Just as you could show a black baby a picture of a white man and get a similar response. It's a built-in defense and safety mechanism to protect us from the unknown, and it's a healthy natural response, which shouldn't be shamed or defeated. The issue is that certain people manipulate and exploit this reaction for political or personal gain, to increase their own personal or perceived sense of power or (moral) authority.
10 years ago but i would like to address what i see as a flaw in the study. The baby chose the bear that they said agreed we her taste in food. But they had the women give negative attributes toward the food the baby liked instead of just having the bear like the other food. I think that would have shown better bias testing. Most people don't like negative attitudes about their choice not necessarily a different choice made.
Wait... how do we even know the babies can even grasp the concept of what the puppets played out? i'm sure there are hundreds of other variables that come into play, but this is very interesting to me.
this is some bull crap and dumb Berkley parents are getting ripped off, how did this story make the news? 'lets project our biased social ideas on our babies, just like we do for our apartment dogs, this is ground braking science'
rubbish experiments,children feel the spirit of someone. they can feel good or evil. i.e children who still cannot talk or understands words because when they do pollution may start from the patents in regards of likes and dislikes..
I don't understand why people get so mad at this these people are allowed to do tests to create a theory it is at the end of the day an interesting concept and whether or not its true or not they should still be allowed to try and figure things out
There is a video out there where they filmed smaller new born in the new born room and saw that they 👀 more towards their color than the opposite think a lot of these is are built-in survival that where all born with ?😊
Ok I get it. Racism is taught. But if I saw a creature with a green shirt helping people and one with a red shirt being a jerk to people. If I have a soul, the choice is easy. When it comes to the "blue puppy" and for this entire video video in general. I think it takes more than leas than 5 kids tested to prove a point.
This means nothing and anybody who knows children is laughing right now 🤣 This is the type of stuff that gets into magazines with "Harvard" by the author.
If only all these infants research includes diverse participants....their demographic experiences can affect your results, assumptions, or conclusions of your research.....
Bull s%it !!! Its taught from the very beginning. Babies are influenced even while in their mother's womb. If you carry hatred and live your life with anger and hatred that child will display that in their lives and in their actions. You can teach fear without saying one word.
Conclusion: "We are all a bunch of babies who SHOULD always vote democrat but because of human nature we end up often voting republican". What nonsense.
its more akin to, Republicans are voting more naturally and more inline with how evolution has shaped their ethnic populations. Democrats are the ones ignoring human biology and evolutionary psychology by always having a xenophillic position. given that evolution has always managed to create groups of individuals that are better suited for the success of their genome. In a natural republican society (ie one that promotes homogeneity) the natural inclination of a population that shares their genome will succeed in higher frequency. but in a democrat society (one that promotes heterogeneity) the natural inclination of the parent population will often be in an environment that will impedes on its success. In a genetic point of view, a certain race's/group's democrat are usually the people who has no actual interest in the betterment of that race/group. ie a traitor. while a republican follows the natural inclination to work in the interest of its group. this finding itself is actually very very exciting for the conservative side of biology because it blows out of the water those who believe that societal behaviors and phenomenons like "racism/sexism/nationalism" are all created by society when it truth its actually natural and healthy events now if they can find proclaimed democrats that have the same race and watch the baby choose between an individual of the same race or an individual with a different race, then we can see whether there's a democrat gene. the same thing can be done to republicans to find if there's a republican gene. and then make an experiment wherein a baby from a democrat family is adopted by a republican family and when that baby grows old, matches with a mate that has the same condition, and makes children, will the teachings from his/her republican family will be passed down to his/her children at an early age and do that too with the republican family and child. with those experiments we can find out whether inclination in one's political beliefs are actually genetics
also, the tiger stopped moving and faced down in like an empty box after the green bunny opened the box 0:34. why would that be good or bad? and how did researcher believe that because baby choose green or orange bunny thus one chooses base on similarities to self and/or on good or bad? also who voiced over to create a story line that maybe not accurate and creating bias. also if there's something in it, whose is it? is it the cat's or the orange bunny's?
Its simuular to the bright, eye catching packages and contents thats no good. This is not a true and balanced senario at all. They are already being taught to be controlled by someone else, whose looking for a certain end result
2:53-Wtf they stupid the baby did not like the blue shirt he looked at it mean playback the only thing I see is adults still manipulate and mold the minds of children in there care raise them with high morals and hope for the best
I am actually appalled at this. You are saying to me that babies were born knowing good from bad... hmm 🤔 then tell me why a baby would climb his ass upon a window or other high places and not know the danger that lies below him? Tell me how some kids pull hot stuff over on themselves... I understand that babies do have a level of intelligence when it comes to other people’s energy and they do explore their surroundings. But I am very much doubtful that it is bias as you are trying to sell it. We were taught not to go near the stove.... barred from doorways and stairway... not saying babies don’t have fear or whatever but to say it is a bias is superficial.
I mean take two real people a baby doesn't know and have them be nice or mean to the baby....how much you want to bet the baby is going to know who the bad person is ? lol
The kid just chose whatever on his left hand. Ya should switch the bunny and ask again. This kid doesn't know good or bad. CNN trippin.
Tkdanso they did
Even showed it
No you could see in his face, he was considering something in his little baby head. Maybe a "but if you try me on something tho, it's on. Otherwise, I'm glad that you like the grahamy things too 🤗🧐." 2:54
Most people are right handed though so that's probably not the case
I'm left hander and I'm offended
Is they
Maybe the colors of the Stuffed animals/their shirts affected it? Was there some kind of control/switching of shirt colors? wtf kind of experiment is this???!!
Eshan Kumar yes, im pretty sure they did. remember that this is just news coverage, not the full experiment
Eshan Kumar
Hmmmm bias towards color then? Sounds familiar
Than how would the babies be able to tell the difference?
If they both looked the same how would you expect them to choose the one that did good?
Ikr
if you switched the colours of the bunnies shirts, then what? because green is naturally a more calming colour than orange/red
Aeryn The Alien im pretty sure they did. remember that this is just news coverage, not the full experiment
Than explain to me how would the babies know the difference between the bunnies?
As amazing as this experiment seems, I think it is somewhat reductionist. We cannot reduce the complexity of a human to simple tasks such as picking a bear. It's deeper than that.
There's always a tradeoff between internal and external validity.
Yes you are right. We cannot reduce the complexity of a human baby to simple tasks such as picking a bear. We should make a baby solve quadratic equation. That would be a right challenge for a baby, isn’t it?
One word sums up this entire video:
*"TRIBALISM"*
There’s a fly on my screen 🪰
I'll never forget the story I read about a father singing to his daughter when she was in the womb. WHENEVER he would sing she was stopped moving and her mother's stomach. So when his daughter was born came out screaming at the top of her lungs and refusing to eat. When her father starts singing to her she became calm and begin to eat.
Our children learn while they're in the womb. Their physical perception of right and wrong is reinforced physically when they're born.
90 % of babies cried when Cooper was around.
The babies know what Cooper does in Cambodia. So they cry.
Okay, this experiment is the least rigorously scientific thing I've seen in my life
This is called stretching it.
1:58 video shows baby pushed the orange stuffed animal cat away
lol. rigged!
meri I
Future President HAHAHAHHAHAHH IM LAUGHING SO HARD RN OMG LMAO
I don't think babies care about language, or even looks. I'm Mexican (light brown skin, black hair) but I'm also part Dutch and live in the Netherlands now. Here, a cousin of mine has a baby boy who's blonde and has blue eyes. For fun I tend to speak in Spanish to the baby and he doesn't care, he also doesn't seem to even be aware that I look different. As long as I'm nice to him,he doesn't care I don't look like his parents or like him. I think this is a better example applied to real life...
I have to say this is the cutest video I’ve seen in a while
Right of the bat, few questions about the good bunny / bad bunny experiment:
-Do babies have a colour bias that was accounted for?
-Do babies have a reach out bias, meaning they might use their visual bias to reach out more on one side than other, which was accounted for?
-Was there an unconscious bias in the presenter possibly reaching out further with the right hand to present the good bunny closer to the baby?
Interesting studies, though!
2:03 The babies like "Ok i did this can i get paid now?"
How's about color preference? What if the babies simply like more vivid color as green or orange, than less vivid one as cream white?
Like me I always liked the color red as long as I can remember
The reason behind choosing orange is that it is more conspicuous...
Is no one gonna point out that a few are just pushing the toys and and not actually picking them up and holding them?
These videos are addictive to watch
In-group preference is a biological imperative. Race is real.
I am black and I honestly like the orange cat just because the colors are bright and I like orange. I don't think the babies are racist I just think their like me. I like the blue dog and the orange cat and so do the babies.
Scientists once again "proving" common sense. "Babies like those who are like them?" How about babies, (and anyone with common sense) likes those who are helpful and protective (green bunny) rather than those who express violence and opposition (orange bunny) It's called survival.
Racism is ingrained in our DNA for good reason.
For 200,000 years we lived in small groups spread over the world.
Each group looked different according to their geographical location.
When they encountered people of a different race, this meant people from far away were likely invading
their territory. It is easy to unlearn..but the initial response will always exist
We all have innate good and bad attributes. It depends which ones get to be exemplified more in our character. That's where nurturing comes into place.
There are many variables when it comes to things like this, but we tend to simplify things and ignore the deeper aspects because it sounds better to us. It’s unfortunate, but so true.
0:25 That baby is so cute 😂😂😂
I believe i was born prejudiced. I remember from a very young age discriminating. Now ive changed alot as ive grown but i do believe people are born somewhat prejudiced.
This is amazing
I think this was more of a baby being a baby than the baby actually choosing based on some innate bias... the babies always went for the item on the left.
Wow the puppet one is really stupid. One acts violently the other acts nice. It didn't matter which liked which at all. The baby just didn't like the mean puppet.
I bet the babies just wanted to go to sleep.
0:25 that baby looks so amazed
NO....Adults ARE..!!!!
Maybe they pick the toy because it has a brighter color and looks better than something gray
She slightly touched on the correlation to how special interest groups form. That was interesting makes me think this barely scratches the surface of what they observe
I can't even believe that they are from Harvard .you are not born that way you learn it from your parents and people around you wow..
We all are born this way, we all have a base-level prejudice, ignorance, hell even racism call it what you will. The racism we think of is the hatred aspect, the hatred part is more or less taught or exposed to us, from parents, organizations, religions, etc. When that happens, it’s no longer what the video suggests, this is an outside influence that makes people behave or think a certain way, so the saying, “No baby is born racist” is...kinda true, but kinda wrong as well.
I love Anderson Cooper!
Babies just made a choice...no thought to it. Just coincidences.
Babies are cute!
or the baby chose orange because negativity is something even an infant senses as danger... FYI
While there as being plenty of writings on how children acquire their biases and their general knowledge (Alport to Piaget and skinner) we need to place that discussion
On the back burner. We need to have candid discussion on why adults harbor such dislike for other for basically superficial reasons. Until then we’re only dodging the issue. An issue we much solve.
Well
, could be the tone of voice she used!
also baby touched the bunny doesn't conclude "choose bunny" as baby in video screamed or made noise perhaps to stop the bunny from coming closer with baby's hand 0:44
i felt like there’s too much what ifs in this experiment bc it’s not that fair. There could be many other reasons why they chose what they chose. They should have mb not put any shirt on the animals and make the story more simple as the child might not even understand what’s going on
What if the baby was 2 young 2 understand that the blue puppy was mean?? They just looked at the puppet show blankley, I don't even think they understood. This proves nothing
hmmm...this explains a lot.
Or you know babies just like vivid colours? xD
This reminds me of the study that shows babies stare at you if your beautiful
No wonder babies don’t stare at me 😂
Oh wow that’s cool
God put a moral compass in all mankind.
Absolutely! There is a predisposition towards a certain feeling. However, those tests are inconclusive and stupid. There could be something bad inside the box which would reverse the situation. The "mean" bunny might actually be the heroic bunny. The "good" bunny may be a frickin' fool! The children are just going on the APPEARANCE of the bunnies which means they are fools too. They're being made out to be fools.
People who are different from you will always be viewed as a threat or a curiosity to some degree. It's built into our instinctual fight-or-flight response. It's evidenced by babies, of all races, showing some fear, confusion, or anxiety at pictures of people who are not their mother or who look anything unlike thier mother or father. You could show a white baby a picture of a black man and get some expression of fear, curiosity, or confusion. But you could also show that baby a picture of a giraffe, or snail, or airplane, and get a similar response. Just as you could show a black baby a picture of a white man and get a similar response.
It's a built-in defense and safety mechanism to protect us from the unknown, and it's a healthy natural response, which shouldn't be shamed or defeated.
The issue is that certain people manipulate and exploit this reaction for political or personal gain, to increase their own personal or perceived sense of power or (moral) authority.
Can we see the difference over sex and color though. I believe that this is relevant
10 years ago but i would like to address what i see as a flaw in the study. The baby chose the bear that they said agreed we her taste in food. But they had the women give negative attributes toward the food the baby liked instead of just having the bear like the other food. I think that would have shown better bias testing. Most people don't like negative attitudes about their choice not necessarily a different choice made.
Wait... how do we even know the babies can even grasp the concept of what the puppets played out? i'm sure there are hundreds of other variables that come into play, but this is very interesting to me.
Omg they so smart
this is some bull crap and dumb Berkley parents are getting ripped off, how did this story make the news? 'lets project our biased social ideas on our babies, just like we do for our apartment dogs, this is ground braking science'
at last It means nothing
rubbish experiments,children feel the spirit of someone.
they can feel good or evil.
i.e children who still cannot talk or understands words because when they do pollution may start from the patents in regards of likes and dislikes..
"IT'S EVOLUTION BABY"
Cap it’s taught
10m subscription and less than 200 comments?
I don't understand why people get so mad at this these people are allowed to do tests to create a theory it is at the end of the day an interesting concept and whether or not its true or not they should still be allowed to try and figure things out
There is a video out there where they filmed smaller new born in the new born room and saw that they 👀 more towards their color than the opposite think a lot of these is are built-in survival that where all born with ?😊
and because of the voice over in the video description, how many people think someone is bad because of differences in conclusions and opinions?
color of pupets
Different color babies?
Ok I get it. Racism is taught. But if I saw a creature with a green shirt helping people and one with a red shirt being a jerk to people. If I have a soul, the choice is easy.
When it comes to the "blue puppy" and for this entire video video in general. I think it takes more than leas than 5 kids tested to prove a point.
This means nothing and anybody who knows children is laughing right now 🤣 This is the type of stuff that gets into magazines with "Harvard" by the author.
You lost me at 3:00
That seems like BS
What is bias
If only all these infants research includes diverse participants....their demographic experiences can affect your results, assumptions, or conclusions of your research.....
Bull s%it !!! Its taught from the very beginning. Babies are influenced even while in their mother's womb. If you carry hatred and live your life with anger and hatred that child will display that in their lives and in their actions. You can teach fear without saying one word.
It's not people who similar to you it's who you raised around
I remember seeing this and seeing how much I loved it.
So, some stuffed animals and a box is gonna determine wether babies have a certain bias. This crap is stupid.
This seems ridiculous.
Yeah, they hate fake stuffed bunny rabbits!
Duh. Is all I have to say.
People like to conveniently forget we’re animals too.
Conclusion: "We are all a bunch of babies who SHOULD always vote democrat but because of human nature we end up often voting republican". What nonsense.
its more akin to, Republicans are voting more naturally and more inline with how evolution has shaped their ethnic populations. Democrats are the ones ignoring human biology and evolutionary psychology by always having a xenophillic position.
given that evolution has always managed to create groups of individuals that are better suited for the success of their genome. In a natural republican society (ie one that promotes homogeneity) the natural inclination of a population that shares their genome will succeed in higher frequency.
but in a democrat society (one that promotes heterogeneity) the natural inclination of the parent population will often be in an environment that will impedes on its success.
In a genetic point of view, a certain race's/group's democrat are usually the people who has no actual interest in the betterment of that race/group. ie a traitor. while a republican follows the natural inclination to work in the interest of its group.
this finding itself is actually very very exciting for the conservative side of biology because it blows out of the water those who believe that societal behaviors and phenomenons like "racism/sexism/nationalism" are all created by society when it truth its actually natural and healthy events
now if they can find proclaimed democrats that have the same race and watch the baby choose between an individual of the same race or an individual with a different race, then we can see whether there's a democrat gene.
the same thing can be done to republicans to find if there's a republican gene.
and then make an experiment wherein a baby from a democrat family is adopted by a republican family and when that baby grows old, matches with a mate that has the same condition, and makes children, will the teachings from his/her republican family will be passed down to his/her children at an early age and do that too with the republican family and child.
with those experiments we can find out whether inclination in one's political beliefs are actually genetics
BABY FEVER AF
Junk
*YUCK I DON'T LIKE GRAM CRAKAS*
Pleeeeeease, lol.
also, the tiger stopped moving and faced down in like an empty box after the green bunny opened the box 0:34. why would that be good or bad? and how did researcher believe that because baby choose green or orange bunny thus one chooses base on similarities to self and/or on good or bad? also who voiced over to create a story line that maybe not accurate and creating bias. also if there's something in it, whose is it? is it the cat's or the orange bunny's?
Not a single black baby was seen that day
This is sloppy and insane.
If babies can vote... They can decide the president
This is creepy, baby!
Kids aren't born racist they are taught to be racist bruh
Yeah
those fuckers are gonna be racist as hell
Its simuular to the bright, eye catching packages and contents thats no good. This is not a true and balanced senario at all. They are already being taught to be controlled by someone else, whose looking for a certain end result
This is stupid they are just babies why do they have to do this to babies 😢
Crazy.
2:53-Wtf they stupid the baby did not like the blue shirt he looked at it mean playback the only thing I see is adults still manipulate and mold the minds of children in there care raise them with high morals and hope for the best
CNN on bias.. I bet this is gonna be good... Lmfao
2014 - humanity discovered tribalism :d
I wonder about babies of color...
I am actually appalled at this. You are saying to me that babies were born knowing good from bad... hmm 🤔 then tell me why a baby would climb his ass upon a window or other high places and not know the danger that lies below him?
Tell me how some kids pull hot stuff over on themselves... I understand that babies do have a level of intelligence when it comes to other people’s energy and they do explore their surroundings. But I am very much doubtful that it is bias as you are trying to sell it. We were taught not to go near the stove.... barred from doorways and stairway... not saying babies don’t have fear or whatever but to say it is a bias is superficial.
God’s Angel sometimes it’s not a lack of intelligence but a lack of fear
I mean take two real people a baby doesn't know and have them be nice or mean to the baby....how much you want to bet the baby is going to know who the bad person is ? lol
God’s Angel You’re completely off here. You’re referring to what’s RIGHT and WRONG, versus the experiment’s topic, what’s GOOD and BAD.
I love the ccp, praise mao.
Wow so cute
This is dumb.
This is bulls hit