Robert B. Pippin on Politics Today, Hegel, Heidegger, Cinema...and more!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @ZizekandSoOn
    @ZizekandSoOn Рік тому +13

    Been looking forward to this one!

  • @erkankant
    @erkankant Рік тому +7

    there we go

  • @chrishorner7679
    @chrishorner7679 Рік тому +4

    That was an excellent interview. My thanks to all involved in it.

  • @juanormeno9072
    @juanormeno9072 Рік тому +2

    I agree with Chris. It was an excellent interview. Clever and illustrative. Congrats!

  • @vitoroliveirajorge368
    @vitoroliveirajorge368 8 місяців тому +1

    a very interesting author, indeed. Interesting also the comments Slavoj Zizek about some of his thoughts. I also admire Agon Hamza and Frank Ruda

  • @henri.r94
    @henri.r94 11 місяців тому +1

    1:20:10 the basketball player reference is golden lol. We all remember the interview he did with "Chasing Leviathan" where he talked about Michael Jordan and the interviewer referenced his name to Scottie Pippin lol. And LOVE the question on the relation between sports and philosophy, which seems to be a question that recedes into the background since Ancient Greece. The only other references I can think of are Rousseau's Emile and some of Nietzsche's works.

    • @EyeByBrian
      @EyeByBrian 6 місяців тому

      You may find of interest Hans Gumbrecht’s _In Praise of Athletic Beauty_ (Harvard UP, 2006).

  • @FG-fc1yz
    @FG-fc1yz День тому

    4:51 metaphysics = logic, i.e. being = pure thinking 7:51! ab15:20! break between Heidegger and Hegel (und Tradition des Deutschen Idealismus), Hegel als der Philosoph des Verfügbaren, Heidegger setzt dem das Unverfügbare bzw. Verborgene entgegen, das sich nur von sich selbst lichtet

  • @WackSmackAttack
    @WackSmackAttack Рік тому +9

    to be fair to Hegel, he doesn't ultimately think there is "propositional" truth to be distinguished from other kinds of truths. philosophy for him is already non-propositional as exhibited in his dialectic of the subject and predicate close to the end of the Science of Logic

    • @letdaseinlive
      @letdaseinlive 8 місяців тому +1

      That would mean he didn't take his Logic to be true.

    • @WackSmackAttack
      @WackSmackAttack 8 місяців тому

      @@letdaseinlive no, it just means that he interprets the Logic as neither propositional nor non-propositional. it only appears propositional

    • @letdaseinlive
      @letdaseinlive 8 місяців тому +1

      He thinks it says something true. If someone showed him a contraction in it he would admit it had a problem.

  • @KristinP-zi2dj
    @KristinP-zi2dj 9 місяців тому

    love is all that matters, really.

  • @thespiritofhegel3487
    @thespiritofhegel3487 Місяць тому

    The owl of Minerva spreads her wings only at the onset of dusk so it is difficult just to say yet, but I believe Trump will be seen as a world-historical figure.

  • @dominiquenuit2181
    @dominiquenuit2181 8 місяців тому

    Pippin is a brilliant writer, but rather blinkered in his discussion of the political situation in US and Europe.

  • @chhhhhris
    @chhhhhris 11 місяців тому

    1:02:56 charlie bit my finger!

  • @youkoshi
    @youkoshi 5 місяців тому

    He keeps talking about “the western modernization project since the ancient Greeks” and I just don’t know what the F he is talking about. He knows there’s such a thing as the middle ages, right?

    • @jrrr5039
      @jrrr5039 3 місяці тому

      I think he just misspoke and alluded to the continuity of a rationalist tendency culminating in late modernity.

    • @youkoshi
      @youkoshi 3 місяці тому

      @@jrrr5039 that doesn’t help or clarify anything since it’s precisely the existence of that continuity that I’m contesting

    • @jrrr5039
      @jrrr5039 3 місяці тому

      @@youkoshi More precisely that the meaning of being has been implicitly assumed to reside in logical determinacy is Pippin and Heidegger's point, I think.