if the judge in a bench trial has "read the briefs" does that mean his mind has been tainted by possible inadmissible evidence? thus requiring a new trial by an ACTUAL fair and impartial judge who has not been predisposed to inadmissible evidence?
❤ Thank you so much Judge Curry for all your excellent videos and easy to read and understand book, which I ordered on Amazon here in Canada, to help me with my pro se divorce trial in a few days.😊 It would be wonderful if you would make more videos because they are so incredibly informative!😊
the fact that no one has commented on this attests to the fact that most cases end in a guilty plea.. wake up people.. i was told once that i was the only person who ever did a hearing on a particular matter.. people just dont know anything about law..
you said opening statements can tie narrative to law.. there is an objection to arguing the law where the example is informing the jury of the law.. now how does that make any sense? ive been railroaded in hearings so that i wasnt able to say anything at all or introduce any evidence and i was told these rules are in place to protect my rights when in fact all that happened is that my rights were violated by the process.. so how can that lead to a fair trial?
I enjoyed listening to your perspective! Thank you for sharing.
Appreciate your time
if the judge in a bench trial has "read the briefs" does that mean his mind has been tainted by possible inadmissible evidence? thus requiring a new trial by an ACTUAL fair and impartial judge who has not been predisposed to inadmissible evidence?
I appreciate all your videos. Thank you.
❤ Thank you so much Judge Curry for all your excellent videos and easy to read and understand book, which I ordered on Amazon here in Canada, to help me with my pro se divorce trial in a few days.😊
It would be wonderful if you would make more videos because they are so incredibly informative!😊
Hey, I like this video. Thank you for sharing with us.
Thank you
the fact that no one has commented on this attests to the fact that most cases end in a guilty plea.. wake up people.. i was told once that i was the only person who ever did a hearing on a particular matter.. people just dont know anything about law..
you said opening statements can tie narrative to law.. there is an objection to arguing the law where the example is informing the jury of the law.. now how does that make any sense? ive been railroaded in hearings so that i wasnt able to say anything at all or introduce any evidence and i was told these rules are in place to protect my rights when in fact all that happened is that my rights were violated by the process.. so how can that lead to a fair trial?
Well it does then give you grounds for appeal
Thank you
Thank you!!!
Great video Judge! 👍🏾
Thank you for Sharing your knowledge with The people of UA-cam 🪨💫