World In Action - Mick Jagger - 1967 - Part Two of Two

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
  • Part two of two: conclusion of Mick Jagger's interview with the British "establishment" after his drug conviction

КОМЕНТАРІ • 51

  • @peliche77
    @peliche77 5 років тому +23

    Smart, clever, handsome and talented. Ladies & gentlemen...The one and only Mick Jagger!!!

  • @katerinasynakova7222
    @katerinasynakova7222 6 років тому +29

    He's so damn beautiful, I can't even perceive what he's saying

    • @sebasdebordeaux8347
      @sebasdebordeaux8347 5 років тому +6

      Yes Katerina Synakova, I understand you, here specially he was really beautiful, but in fact his beauty is erotism and this comes mostly from his mouth.. such a mouth is a fucking gift from nature!!! and because of this mouth, his smile is absolutely stunning..! So I would say this guy is a injustice made to all other men.. but I could never blame him, because he never push it too far with his physic and always keep straight, modest and thoughtful.. I like this guy!

    • @Brendonmakesmesmile
      @Brendonmakesmesmile 5 років тому

      He’s really not saying much of anything so you’re not missing much 😂

    • @Methilde
      @Methilde 2 роки тому +1

      @@Brendonmakesmesmile Mick was there just in a diplomatic way cause the Stones were constantly attacked by medias and establishment.
      Later he said that english medias were awnfully mean in general.

    • @realgood.melinda9440
      @realgood.melinda9440 Рік тому +1

      Same!! Lol

  • @Cameraman61
    @Cameraman61 11 років тому +11

    Jagger later admitted he was quite heavily sedated for this interview.

    • @sebasdebordeaux8347
      @sebasdebordeaux8347 5 років тому +3

      an answer to a 6 years old comment..? should I?? yes and then it seems that those drugs made is mind clear and his statements very interesting.. Despite I must confess I don't get ALL he says (I'm french and my english isn't completely fluent ) but for what I get, it doesn't seems to be confused and even very interesting

  • @Mirabella76
    @Mirabella76 4 роки тому +3

    From the 2020, is not it amazing to watch how bunch of conservatives representing so called establishment grill a free-minded 23 year old who actually did not really commit anything. They clearly treated him like a danger for the world they'd run for centuries. And actually they were' not that wrong. Mick handled it really well though even tranquilized.

  • @ewanfanatic88
    @ewanfanatic88 11 років тому +6

    I wish I had paid attention to what he was saying... his beauty was quite a distraction

    • @Methilde
      @Methilde 2 роки тому

      You need to see it twice, one for what he's saying an other just for looking :)

  • @FaerieCrone
    @FaerieCrone 11 років тому +3

    So you don't think that drafting babies to go die in a war was anything for that generation to get pissed off about? Look at what the previous generation was doing to them! And you wonder why they didn't want to be the same as they were.

  • @yosuanathanael957
    @yosuanathanael957 10 років тому +6

    So Young...

  • @oliveslovess
    @oliveslovess 11 років тому +16

    I just like to watch him talk. He was so beautiful

  • @barrycalvillo2884
    @barrycalvillo2884 3 роки тому +1

    Mick was attending the london school of economics before the stones hit it big...what if?

  • @FaerieCrone
    @FaerieCrone 11 років тому +3

    You know, you are right, because the entertainers before them never involved themselves in substance abuse at all. People like Little Richard, Ray Charles and Billie Holliday were saints lol Dean Martin and Frank Sinatra were squeaky clean I suppose...Just because it was covered up doesn't make it right. In fact in my opinion, it is worse because it was a big lie.
    My point originally was that the rock stars of that day broke down the barriers of class distinction.

  • @DarknessOverflow
    @DarknessOverflow 13 років тому +5

    Thanks for posting the video. I think Jagger handled himself well with four suits breathing down his neck.

  • @FaerieCrone
    @FaerieCrone 11 років тому +2

    Oh okay, so everybody should have continued listening to Cliff Richard and Frankie Avalon then. Sorry but I would have drowned myself.

  • @axxellein
    @axxellein Рік тому +1

    TRES Cool

  • @heliotropezzz333
    @heliotropezzz333 4 роки тому +1

    I think the first guy that speaks is Jacob Rees Mogg's father.

  • @FaerieCrone
    @FaerieCrone 11 років тому +2

    LOL oops sooorry
    Silly to blame rock stars for today, when the world was already changing before Jagger and the like were even famous. The film industry for example, right? The angry young men and all that and art student films were very "in your face" - so I believe that it would have happened anyway, don't you agree?

    • @Methilde
      @Methilde 11 місяців тому

      Maybe, but not for such a wide audience.

  • @mercedescortez222
    @mercedescortez222 7 років тому +4

    love that smirk @4:34

    • @sebasdebordeaux8347
      @sebasdebordeaux8347 5 років тому +1

      Yes of course! so seductive!! He's too gifted by nature, I hate him.. (joke)

  • @Brendonmakesmesmile
    @Brendonmakesmesmile 11 років тому +8

    and still smart as fuck

  • @FaerieCrone
    @FaerieCrone 11 років тому +1

    Explain what you mean by 'natural path'. What people listen to is a preference just like any other art form. The old music was (and is) still there.
    If the music of Jagger, Bowie and Cooper spoke to the young - as did the first forms of rock did - then surely it reflected their mood and the need for change? Jagger speaks of freedom in this interview, so what's wrong with that? I don't want to live in a world full of milky safe censorship because if we did, UA-cam wouldn't even be here.

  • @ceeemm1901
    @ceeemm1901 Рік тому

    I just love the way the establishment brings in people like this to glean the thinking of the bolshies in order to go back to the office and draw up offensive plans...Mick you were played.

    • @_Singularity_
      @_Singularity_ Рік тому +1

      he doesn't actually say anything though

  • @swami1
    @swami1 5 років тому +1

    Where's Part One?

  • @patrickdoval
    @patrickdoval 5 років тому +1

    Nice video !

  • @MBQuaver58
    @MBQuaver58 12 років тому +1

    @FaerieCrone very well said!

  • @kanumbra
    @kanumbra 13 років тому +3

    good on you mick! he did indeed handle that well. thanks so much for posting

  • @MichaelHansenFUN
    @MichaelHansenFUN 6 років тому +2

    where is part one

    • @morrisonAV
      @morrisonAV  6 років тому +1

      UA-cam took it down....not sure why

  • @richardlaversuch9460
    @richardlaversuch9460 5 років тому

    What are you talking about Mick? Are you on drugs?

  • @lilybeans8101
    @lilybeans8101 5 років тому

    what is he saying

  • @edwardszzz
    @edwardszzz 12 років тому

    the Fop versus the Fogeys.

  • @FaerieCrone
    @FaerieCrone 11 років тому

    What you are saying would be like me blaming rap music for gang warfare - and that wouldn't be right either. Rappers write about the life they know and the world as they see it - just as the rock n' rollers did.
    The previous generation to rock n' roll had already separated themselves with an outdated and petty class system.

  • @zareonx7959
    @zareonx7959 11 років тому +1

    And now in 2013 Jagger is so totally consumed by money. Well, he has a lot more than I have, but I still see the recent tour as greed.

    • @bmxseeker6780
      @bmxseeker6780 5 років тому +3

      whats he suppose to do just stay home and be pillars of the community , if he can still preform why not keep entertaining instead of sitting like a stone

    • @sheLovesG
      @sheLovesG 3 роки тому +1

      Because there’s still a big demand