Back to the Future Part II (1989) First Time Watching! Movie Reaction!!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
  • Back to the Future Part II (1989)
    Great Scott (Part II)!
    Become a Schmitthead for Full Length Reactions & Patreon Exclusive Polls:
    / tbr_schmitt
    Please don’t forget to like and subscribe! Let me know what you think in the comments.
    EMAIL: tbrschmitt.assist@gmail.com
    INSTAGRAM: @TBR_Schmitt / tbr_schmitt
    TWITCH: @TBR_Schmitt / tbr_schmitt
    TWITTER: @TBR_Schmitt / tbr_schmitt
    BACKUP UA-cam CHANNEL: / theschmitts
    Original Music Score by Lui Salazar! Check him out on Instagram at @_lui_salazar
    This video is for commentary and criticism only and is not a replacement for watching Back to the Future Part II
    Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT INTENDED. All rights belong to their respective owners.
    #tbrschmitt

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @TBRSchmitt
    @TBRSchmitt  3 роки тому +303

    Two down! One to go! This trilogy has been so fun and clever so far and we can’t wait to watch the final part!
    Thank you all for the support!

    • @jean-paulaudette9246
      @jean-paulaudette9246 3 роки тому +6

      The third one is my personal favorite. Lots of fun.

    • @williamsmith5340
      @williamsmith5340 3 роки тому +3

      Awesome movie

    • @m.e.3862
      @m.e.3862 3 роки тому +3

      Just subbed. You two are great reactors. Keep up the good work 😊👍

    • @xenowerks7020
      @xenowerks7020 3 роки тому +4

      wow I've seen the movie many times and I never noticed the 3 year gap for the legal gambling age of 21.

    • @amazingusername8925
      @amazingusername8925 3 роки тому +2

      The writer has said in the past that psycho rich biff was based on trump!

  • @piratetv1
    @piratetv1 3 роки тому +122

    The problem is that you're looking back on 2015. When i saw this in the 80s, i saw a ton of things that didn't exist. Flat tvs that hang on the wall, smart house computers you talk to, finger print locks, camera drones, fast food kiosks, kids using wearable/ mobile devices at the table. They guessed so much of the world we live in

    • @daustin8888
      @daustin8888 Рік тому +6

      The only thing they couldn't predict was the internet

    • @Sideqazxsw
      @Sideqazxsw 9 місяців тому +7

      ​@@daustin8888
      The scene of Marty's video call with Needles has personal information on the screen if the viewer looks closely. The movie-makers predicted the rise of social media in the early twenty-first century.

    • @boomeister2
      @boomeister2 21 день тому

      We are still waiting for those hover boards! 😋

    • @piratetv1
      @piratetv1 21 день тому

      @boomeister2 i remember being told in an interview that they existed but parents groups banned them. Man that was a cool dream

    • @Itwasalwaysme_Noone
      @Itwasalwaysme_Noone 3 дні тому

      They predicted the Nike shoes, the same exact style, the exact colours, same everything!

  • @Joker_JAK
    @Joker_JAK 3 роки тому +413

    I did something fun with this film that can never be duplicated. On October 21st, 2015, I watched BTTF 2. I timed it so that the exact moment Doc, Marty, and Jennifer travel to the future (4:29pm) it would be the same exact time in real life. So, basically, when they arrive in October 21st, 2015 at 4:29pm, it was that exact date and time in real life. It was surreal.

    • @TBRSchmitt
      @TBRSchmitt  3 роки тому +72

      Wow that is impressive!

    • @Joker_JAK
      @Joker_JAK 3 роки тому +18

      @@TBRSchmitt Thanks. Also, thanks for the content. Love your videos.

    • @angelluisf7730
      @angelluisf7730 3 роки тому +25

      I emailed a reminder to my work mates: "guys, we are in the future".

    • @bustedsim
      @bustedsim 3 роки тому +8

      BttF II was my favorite movie growing up so I was always looking forward to that date and what the future would hold. If I could, I would've watched the movie on the date as well. Instead I was in the hospital getting diagnosed with MS. -_-

    • @labyfan1313
      @labyfan1313 3 роки тому +27

      On October 21, 2015 they showed the trilogy in the movie theatres back to back to back. It was the best time ever. They had giveaways, showed bonus features between the films, like the trailer for Jaws 19. We were treated like royalty, it was great.

  • @LupusLifestyle
    @LupusLifestyle 3 роки тому +375

    Not gonna even lie. I've been watching this movie since a kid and just now realized that Marty McFly's daughter was played by Michael J. Fox 😭

  • @JustaGuy2.0
    @JustaGuy2.0 3 роки тому +31

    For the ones that don't know, the reason they changed the actress was because Claudia Wells mother was diagnosed with cancer, which made her put her acting career on hold.
    And it was a big hiatus, from 86 to 2011.

  • @alucard624
    @alucard624 3 роки тому +172

    Yep, that was indeed Elijah Wood at 6:21 when he really was a Hobbit.

    • @maxdonahue210
      @maxdonahue210 3 роки тому +11

      It was his first movie role too

  • @Wetwilly87
    @Wetwilly87 3 роки тому +84

    5:16 30 years from now, it will be “Fast and Ferocious 20” and a hologram 83 year old Vin Diesel will drive a vehicle right at you shouting “Family!!!!”

    • @lentrax2991
      @lentrax2991 3 роки тому +13

      Car still looks fake.

    • @Ulexcool
      @Ulexcool 3 роки тому +3

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @adgato75
      @adgato75 3 роки тому +2

      Movies will not even exist in 30 years. They will be some weird short form thing that evolved from memes.
      But the rest sounds right. They already have "Family!" memes lol

    • @blanewilliams5960
      @blanewilliams5960 2 роки тому

      Oh God No!

  • @centuryrox
    @centuryrox 3 роки тому +413

    The one prediction about 2015 they almost got completely right was the Chicago Cubs winning the World Series. They were actually off by only one year (they won in 2016), which is an amazing prediction in itself since at the time this movie was made (1989), the Cubs had not won the World Series since 1908!

    • @Palmieres
      @Palmieres 3 роки тому +88

      People always get fixated on the flying cars and the hoverboard not being real, but they got several other stuff right, including flat screens, caller ID, video calls, screens everywhere around the house and kids not letting go of their personal devices, voice activated home assistants (like Alexa or Siri), videogames where you don't need to use controls (those with cameras that register your body's movements), among a few other things. They weren't really _that_ far off except with the propulsion stuff that makes everything fight gravity a real possibility. They also didn't predict Princess Diana's death, obviously (newspaper scene).

    • @SuperMuneera
      @SuperMuneera 3 роки тому +13

      @@Palmieres Predicting the near future is actually very easy. Especially if it's a span of 100 years or less. Ask someone to predict 1000 years or more and they'll get everything wrong.
      As for the sporting part, sometimes life imitates art. Young fans of the film might have grown up wanting to win with the Cubs in 2015. They could have become baseball players and that prediction almost became reality.

    • @mattp6089
      @mattp6089 3 роки тому +9

      @@SuperMuneera Not sure it'll matter much to them in 1000 years whether they were right or not!
      The 1000 years thing reminds me of the cleverness of the show Futurama. Whenever they show you a good prediction in the 1000 years Fry is in stasis from 2000 to 3000, it generally happens closer to the year 3000. Whenever there is a terrible tragedy such as aliens invading Earth, generally closer to the year 2000...
      So according to Futurama we have some bad times before they get better.

    • @centuryrox
      @centuryrox 3 роки тому +12

      @@Palmieres They also got the existence of the internet right. When old Biff pays for his cab fare with his thumb print, there has to be some kind of internet connection in order to make the transaction work instantly.

    • @-M0LE
      @-M0LE 3 роки тому +6

      And Nike invented the same trainers/sneakers from the film

  • @jaybird455
    @jaybird455 3 роки тому +51

    30+ years later and I still catch bits of the plot that I didn’t fully recognize in the 1000 times I’ve seen this movie lol. One of the greatest trilogies ever!

    • @jaybird455
      @jaybird455 3 роки тому +2

      @@bcn1gh7h4wk oh wow. Yeah, because they debate on when they have to go back in order to erase the alternate timeline. It took Marty talking to rich Biff about the almanac to establish when old Biff gave it to young Biff. That’s crazy, I’ll have to watch again, but you may have just found a hole in the plot that I never thought existed. If the yellow one was the last time jump, Doc should’ve known when they needed to go back in the first place.

    • @jaybird455
      @jaybird455 3 роки тому +1

      @@bcn1gh7h4wk ok I see what you’re saying now. Good point!

  • @subasurf
    @subasurf 3 роки тому +42

    The whole "there's only one man who can help me?" sequence is one of my favourite moments in cinema.
    It just so perfectly captures how fun these films are.

  • @tfpp1
    @tfpp1 3 роки тому +151

    Actually, the movie's portrayal of 2015 got quite a few things accurately: the fax machine (somewhat outdated now but weren't "new" in 2015), video chat, watching multiple channels, 3D movies, "endless" sequels (Jaws 19), keyless entry, they actually made those shoes with power laces for real and you could buy them for a brief time, probably a few other things I'm forgetting. And the rest are not exactly right, but are closely related. For instance, we don't have hover boards, but we have automated scooters, handle-less segues, Amazon is working on delivery by way of drone, we're currently working on self-driving cars (I imagine it won't be too long before we have self-walking dogs). Though, honestly, I don't think anyone back in the 80s really thought we'd have flying cars. That was the decade I grew up in, and while it was a fantasy, I think as a culture we instinctively knew that wasn't possible, not by 2015 anyway.
    It's mostly the punchline to a joke setup. Originally, the makers of the film ended the first part with the flying car as a "wink" to the audience, and weren't planning any sequels. But because the audience loved it and were kinda forced to make a sequel (or two), they HAD to follow through with what they and done. Otherwise, they wouldn't have done it that way, maybe. They've even said as much - Jennifer wouldn't have gotten in the car if they knew they were making sequels, which is why she's not part of the plot too much.

    • @DocMicrowave
      @DocMicrowave 3 роки тому +7

      Yep, about the only thing that hasn't come to fruition yet is flying cars.
      Made me think of that old IBM commercial back in the early 2000s starring Avery Brooks (Cap. Sisko from Star Trek DS9).
      He is walking on the Brooklyn bridge asking the question, "It is the year 2000! Where are my flying cars? Where? I was promised flying cars!"
      And then he refers to the power of IBM computers and how flying cars are not needed to get work done.

    • @Joker_JAK
      @Joker_JAK 3 роки тому +18

      To be fair, the movie didn't predict the shoes. The shoes were made because of the movie.

    • @jaybird455
      @jaybird455 3 роки тому +7

      Don’t forget the sports angle. The Chicago Cubs won the World Series in 2016, which was one year off from this movie’s prediction. They hadn’t won the Series since 1908, longest drought in history. Also, they were accurate on a MLB team being renamed to Miami, who are now known as the Miami Marlins. Crazy accuracy there!
      Edit: I first stated an MLB team “moved” to Miami, but realized they were already in Miami, just called the Florida Marlins and renamed to the Miami Marlins. It was just funny back then hearing a “Miami” team in MLB.

    • @DavidRomigJr
      @DavidRomigJr 3 роки тому +9

      We’ve had flying car prototypes as early as the 1930s. They’ve been around. They’ve just never hit the mainstream. And honestly I can’t imagine allowing the average citizen to fly unless it’s far more automated. You thought automobile crashes were bad now? How about mid-air or into someone’s house?

    • @DocMicrowave
      @DocMicrowave 3 роки тому +7

      @@DavidRomigJr Lol, same here. It was a nice dream but there are far too many safety and security concerns that come with being able to fly where ever you want. Even with automation.

  • @mgordon1100
    @mgordon1100 3 роки тому +17

    When BTTF came out, we didn't know there was going to be a sequel. In other words, we really weren't waiting 4 years. They did a good job of refreshing the memory by opening the film with the same closing scene, and rolled it back a bit.

    • @Osprey850
      @Osprey850 2 роки тому +2

      We were waiting 3.5 years, though, because the VHS with "To Be Continued..." added to the end was released in May 1986 and Part II didn't come out until November 1989.

  • @arconeagain
    @arconeagain 3 роки тому +27

    I like how you instantly recognised Flea.

  • @tulinfirenze1990
    @tulinfirenze1990 3 роки тому +37

    The fax machine from the Japanese boss in 2015 is actually one of THE MOST ACCURATE things in the whole movie. Anybody who has spent any time at all in Japan knows that Japanese STILL uses faxes to this very day.

    • @daustin8888
      @daustin8888 10 місяців тому +2

      Odd. They are all about efficiency

    • @RedElm747
      @RedElm747 7 місяців тому

      @@daustin8888 Fax machines are regularly used for more sensitive documents because they're more secure than other methods like email.

    • @Steelburgh
      @Steelburgh 2 місяці тому

      @@daustin8888 But also all about tradition.

  • @sudhisira
    @sudhisira 3 роки тому +7

    I think it is in BTTF 3 that Doc and Marty exchange their lines on one occasion. Marty says, "Great Scott!" and the Doc says, "This is heavy!".

  • @laurenherda2415
    @laurenherda2415 3 роки тому +72

    Thomas F. Wilson as Biff is my favorite character in all these, his role in the 3rd is his best performance in my opinion. He is the complete opposite in real life such a nice guy, I've been watching these movies since I was 6 and still to this day I enjoy it just as much! Growing up in the 80s was such a great time I sure miss it!

    • @r.g.o3879
      @r.g.o3879 3 роки тому +7

      He was a great actor who should have had a much better career but his part in these three films were a major part of what made them a success

    • @twainjones
      @twainjones 2 роки тому +2

      Yeah he's an incredible actor! Flea also, plays a complete asshole in the movie but is like the nicest guy irl :D

  • @billbabcock1833
    @billbabcock1833 3 роки тому +68

    Robert Zemeckis later said that if he had any plans for a 2nd movie, he never would have had Jennifer get into the DeLorean at the end of the 1st movie.

  • @brockhedge2750
    @brockhedge2750 3 роки тому +8

    Fun fact: In 1955 when Biff and his grandma are yelling at each other. It was Biff who was doing the voice of his grandma...

  • @okeefe757
    @okeefe757 3 роки тому +109

    I think you're the only reactor to know who Flea is (at least that I've seen) and recognize him. That was quick on Samantha's part to hear and realize that quick clip mentioning that Lorraine's last name was McFly before she married Biff.

    • @TBRSchmitt
      @TBRSchmitt  3 роки тому +40

      Red Hot Chili Peppers are my favorite band so I sure would hope I can recognize him lol!

    • @GNo03
      @GNo03 3 роки тому

      Also, the clip says “in 1973”, and Marty is obviously not 12

    • @osirispluto8782
      @osirispluto8782 3 роки тому +3

      I love how many classic films Flea's in. (Not to mention other people's albums he's played on as well)

    • @t0nito
      @t0nito 3 роки тому +7

      Also realizing Marty's daughter is played by Michael J Fox. Some reactors don't even notice that! LOL

    • @piratetv1
      @piratetv1 3 роки тому +4

      Flea (Douglas J Needles) is Marty's bully. They were friends as kids but Doug started bullying Marty in high school and dared him to steal a vacuum tube for his guitar amp from Doc's lab. Doc had spread rumors that he was a crazy person so people wouldn't snoop around his house. Marty broke in and Doc caught him, then he hired Marty as a lab assistant. Without Needles, and Marty being afraid of being called chicken, the movie wouldn't have happened. ( i got this info from the comics and the time machine haynes manual

  • @IBeforeAExceptAfterK
    @IBeforeAExceptAfterK 2 роки тому +10

    29:05 Fun fact: One of the early ideas for the script didn't even involve a return to 1955. They initially wanted to go back to the 60s to explore what Marty's parents were like then. Of course, then they had the idea of revisiting the events of the first film, and the rest is history.
    29:50 They actually pioneered a lot of the techniques that they used to fit the same actor in more than once. If I recall correctly they had to invent a special camera specifically for the dinner table scene in 2015 since Michael J Fox was playing 3 characters at once.
    33:02 Another fun fact: At one point the producers made a joke about hoverboards being real and that they just hadn't hit the market yet. A lot of kids wrote letters to Mattel asking for hoverboards in the late 80s and early 90s.

    • @RaptorNX01
      @RaptorNX01 Рік тому

      the hoverboard thing, it had been the behind the scene doc that came out just after this one was out. the host made a comment that the boards were in development. it was supposed to be a joke, but a large number of fans thot it was true. after 3 came out there was another behind the scene doc released covering the whole trilogy. the host of that one actually apologized for the comment in the last video and said the boards didn't exist.

  • @carlosrvra
    @carlosrvra 3 роки тому +3

    I'm reminded that USA Today PRINTED that cover on their newspaper on that date in 2015 as a souvenir issue.
    Also, the robot waiters in Cafe 80s was inspired by the 80s “Max Headroom” show. I REALLY wish Universal Studios would do a future Hill Valley.

  • @MWSin1
    @MWSin1 3 роки тому +24

    The only movie I can think of with a Chekhov's dust cover.

  • @ragethesystem-zl2tv
    @ragethesystem-zl2tv 3 роки тому +24

    Hard to believe this one was considered a failure when it was released. It’s aged incredibly well and has become a classic along with the trilogy as a whole.

    • @BooneLuleyo
      @BooneLuleyo 10 місяців тому

      It was deemed inferior but not a failure.

  • @richardb6260
    @richardb6260 3 роки тому +106

    Marty's daughter was using VR glasses. So, they kinda got that right.

    • @DoubleMonoLR
      @DoubleMonoLR 3 роки тому +4

      VR was already well known by the time of the movie, Sega announced VR glasses just 2 years after the movie(albeit they later cancelled the product). Nintendo released the 'Virtual Boy' in 1995, which was seemingly based on ideas from the 80s. Naturally they were pretty limited compared to modern iterations though, though a lot of that isn't just the VR display itself, but the computing required to generate the imagery.
      Primitive versions have been around since the 50s and 60s.
      At the time, holographs were expected to be big too. I can remember playing a 'holographic' video game in the early to mid 90s, albeit it was using a normal display with mirrors etc to cheat to create a similar effect, rather than a true holograph. It did look pretty cool though!

    • @digi_edits
      @digi_edits 3 роки тому +8

      Also the drone taking pictures of the scene for the newspaper.

    • @richardb6260
      @richardb6260 3 роки тому +2

      @@DoubleMonoLR Virtual Boy was hardly wearable. A better analogy to this might be Google Glass. She seems like she's watching something rather than playing something. Of course, the real reason she's wearing them is to make it easier to use a stand-in when another Fox character is in the scene.

    • @VladimirGerasimenko80
      @VladimirGerasimenko80 3 роки тому +1

      In 1955 Morton Heilig first explained his vision of an apparatus capable of stimulating multiplex senses in the book “The Cinema of the Future“.
      In 1962 he built a prototype named Sensorama.
      1960 - The first VR Head Mounted Display.
      One more Heilig’s substantial invention - virtual reality HMD Telesphere Mask. It is the headset which provided stereoscopic 3D and wide vision with stereo sound with no motion tracking.
      1961 first motion tracking HMD - Headsight
      Philco Corporation designed a new helmet that used head movements to gain access into an artificial environment that was enhanced with a tracking system.
      1965 - Ivan Sutherland reported the “Ultimate Display” concept that could simulate reality to the point where nobody could feel the difference from actual reality.
      1968 - first VR/AR HMD “Sword of Damocles”
      Ivan Sutherland and Bob Sproull created the very first VR/AR head mounted display (Sword of Damocles) that was coupled to a computer TX-2.
      1979-1982 - McDonnell Douglas vital HMD
      Thomas Furness, VR/AR pioneer, had a background in creating visual displays ascending to 1966. He succeeded in fundraising for a prototype system to be fabricated at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. The Visually Coupled Airborne Systems Simulator (VCASS) was presented in 1982.
      In 1981 Michael McGreevy (NASA’s Ames Research Center) began a research program in dimensional information transfer at NASA, accentuating the interpretation of 3-D displays. In 1984 to craft a resembling system for NASA called a virtual workstation. In the issue, they developed the Virtual Interface Environment Workstation (VIEW). It was the first system that combined computer graphics and video imaging, 3-D sound, voice recognition and synthesis, and an HMD. The system was supplemented by a data glove.
      1987 : Eyephone HMD (Jaron Lanier, Visual Programming Lab)
      Originally the term “virtual reality” was offered by Jaron Lanier in 1987 upon saturated research activity into this technological form.

    • @PhantomFilmAustralia
      @PhantomFilmAustralia 3 роки тому +5

      Video phone calls, widescreen flat screens, drones, thumbprint identification, color newspapers, mobile electronic payment, robotic café employees, keyless entry, voice activated electronic devices. Apart from the obvious, I'd say the predictions in technology were pretty accurate.

  • @claytonhaag6931
    @claytonhaag6931 3 роки тому +220

    Such a solid trilogy!

    • @TBRSchmitt
      @TBRSchmitt  3 роки тому +28

      Yeah I’m sure the last one will be just as great if not better!

    • @LordLOC
      @LordLOC 3 роки тому +9

      @@TBRSchmitt Well most critics at least, maybe not viewers consider part 2 the weakest of the trilogy, so if you go by that logic you should enjoy 3 even more than 2. I actually love all 3 movies equally since they are meant to be a complete story (even if they never originally planned on this being a trilogy) and as you say in the review, they intertwined the 1st movie so well in the 2nd and then the 3rd is like a complete 180 more or less setting wise. It's just great stuff. I still hold out hope we'll get a new Back to the Future at some point, but it'd have to have a new cast nowadays. Maybe Marty's kids could be the focus as main characters or something.

    • @jsmithers.
      @jsmithers. 3 роки тому +3

      @@LordLOC No it goes 1 then 2 then 3 in order. 2 is better than 3 because it's more interesting. The future and all the gadgets explored and memes created as a result is more fun than the old west.

    • @zwil2213
      @zwil2213 Рік тому

      ​@@jsmithers. 1, 3, 2

    • @jsmithers.
      @jsmithers. Рік тому +1

      @@zwil2213 No.

  • @xexorweglin
    @xexorweglin 3 роки тому +5

    30:45 1958 *is* actually an important date in this movie. It's when young Biff won his first million betting with the Almanac's help.

  • @dnllrnt
    @dnllrnt 3 роки тому +47

    I love Doc's face when Marty asks him if he and Jennifer become assholes in the future. Like he has to double check himself before answering 😆

    • @ComeOnIsSuchAJoy
      @ComeOnIsSuchAJoy 3 роки тому +5

      ... which he didn't do at the end of the first one. Lorraine also didn't pause between the words 'interesting' and 'music' in the first one, either (George and Marty also wave to each other earlier this time, and there was also no applause for Marty when he left the stage, either).

    • @tonyyul703
      @tonyyul703 3 роки тому +3

      Lol Actually Christopher Lloyd forgot his lines...

  • @owenitzura
    @owenitzura 2 роки тому +11

    GREAT video! I'm a massive BTTF fan and I was so happy seeing you experience the movies for the first time. A bit of information regarding the year 2015 in the movies, the writer and director stated that they were not trying to "predict" how 2015 would be. They knew they would be way off, but what they were trying to do was to present a "clean and hopeful" future (Although the DID get some things right! Like video calls, smart glasses, and the Cubs did win the World Series! Though that happened one year later, in 2016!). Back in the day, all movies about the future like Blade Runner always presented a dark, dirty, distopian future. With BTTF Part 2, they wanted to do the opposite, they wanted to show a brighter future, to try and be original about it instead of doing what everyone else was doing with the "future" at the time.

  • @twainjones
    @twainjones 2 роки тому +19

    19:02 The shock on his face when Marty jumps, the acting here by Tom Wilson is PHENOMENAL

    • @Steelburgh
      @Steelburgh 2 місяці тому

      He was so underrated in all of these. Popcorn movies like this are only as good as their villains.

  • @Rmlohner
    @Rmlohner 3 роки тому +7

    It's pretty much a miracle that this film turned out as well as it did. The first film's ending was never meant to actually lead into a sequel, so they had to come up with a whole story from scratch built off a very specific scenario of Marty and Jennifer going to the future to fix something involving their kids. The filmmakers had zero idea what to do with Jennifer and ended up just putting her to sleep for most of the film (they've since said they never would have put her in the car if they'd actually intended to do a sequel), and even couldn't come up with any way to make a whole film out of the future setting, so it ends up just being an unusually lengthy setup for the main story. Plus, Crispin Glover refused to come back so they were limited to using clips of George from the first film, unable to have the new Marty interfere at all in his story. But despite all that, the movie is still a blast and a worthy followup to the original.

  • @jkocher6973
    @jkocher6973 3 роки тому +16

    When this and III were produced - the camera work, using the same actor in the same scene, was really cutting edge stuff. Still holds up pretty well, I think.

  • @805Bruin
    @805Bruin 3 роки тому +10

    Watched this in the theater when I was a kid. As soon as the credits were over, there was a trailer for BTTF 3 that was showed.

    • @OneAndOnlyMe
      @OneAndOnlyMe 3 роки тому +1

      Yep, parts 2 and 3 were shot back to back.

  • @Oldmangamess
    @Oldmangamess Рік тому +1

    At 8:03 the person who fell outside the court house almost died from the stunt because she didn't make it through the window and fell like 30 feet. She had to get a bunch of reconstructive surgery. She was complaining about the safety of it all day because the actual stunt woman actually quit because she knew it was too risky.

  • @jerryrule1
    @jerryrule1 3 роки тому +36

    The Cubs winning the world series happened a year later. The back to the future series is very cool.

    • @IdealUser
      @IdealUser 3 роки тому +4

      The baseball strike of '94 delayed the Cubs win by one year!

    • @rio_s550
      @rio_s550 3 роки тому +3

      And Miami is in MLB

    • @ComeOnIsSuchAJoy
      @ComeOnIsSuchAJoy 3 роки тому

      @@rio_s550 Albeit called the 'Marlins,' not the 'Gators' or whatever (the team being founded 4 years after this movie).

    • @nrkgalt
      @nrkgalt 3 роки тому +3

      @@ComeOnIsSuchAJoy Marty was perplexed about Miami because the Marlins weren’t created until 1993.

    • @yadarehey1130
      @yadarehey1130 3 роки тому

      The Cubs getting kicked out of the playoffs on Back To The Future Day was the most Cubs thing to happen.

  • @mr.marshmello555
    @mr.marshmello555 3 роки тому +64

    I know I'm probably the only one but Back to the Future 2 is my favorite of the movies.✌
    Also you should check out the Arnold Schwarzenegger movie "Last Action Hero". It's a good movie.👍

    • @Joker_JAK
      @Joker_JAK 3 роки тому +13

      It's my favorite as well.

    • @TBRSchmitt
      @TBRSchmitt  3 роки тому +20

      It was such a fun movie! Yeah that is definitely on our list of Arnold movies to watch!

    • @Camuska
      @Camuska 3 роки тому +3

      My favorite too.

    • @diha9004
      @diha9004 3 роки тому +2

      mine too

    • @diha9004
      @diha9004 3 роки тому +1

      @@TBRSchmitt same director as Predator

  • @billiam8554
    @billiam8554 3 роки тому +11

    I'm so happy the "double tie" fashion died out in 2015 🤣

  • @donaldduncan7095
    @donaldduncan7095 3 роки тому +1

    Once upon a time....I was coming home from my night shift job when I came upon an area of my neighborhood that was very brightly lit up , I soon discovered they were shooting a scene of BTTF 2. ( the Shotgun porch scene with Stricklin ) It was 1: 00 am and everybody watching left but me so I watched them do the scene about 5 or 6 times. Now when I watch that scene I can imagine my younger self there in that time fully taking it in. I may have been born to be a BTTF fan ....10/04/55 ( 10: 04 ). Great job on the reaction and especially the after talk.

  • @newsandsports7077
    @newsandsports7077 3 роки тому +13

    That Butthead Marty Mcfly prevented me from being rich and he's really turning me into a Mad Dog, think I'll go drown my sorrows with a bottle of fine Kentucky Red Eye

  • @DementisXYZ
    @DementisXYZ 2 роки тому +1

    While I'm extremely late to this one, and I don't know if anyone else has shared this information, but there's a deleted scene in this movie that I absolutely love. At the scene where old Biff returns to 2015, you see him struggling to get out of the car. In the deleted scene, we see that he is in a load of pain as he collapses next to some garbage cans, then falls over the rest of the way as his body disappears, much like how Marty's started to in the first movie. The directors confirmed that somewhere between 1985 and 2015, Lorraine shot and killed Biff.

  • @highstimulation2497
    @highstimulation2497 3 роки тому +25

    "EAT LEAD, SLACKERS!!!!" is like the best line ever, what with the hysterics of it and all.

  • @deviltriggeredgaming3182
    @deviltriggeredgaming3182 3 роки тому +13

    I love your reactions and I have to say you two are just adorable together. You can just feel the love you guys have for one another through conversations body language. If I'm ever feeling a tad bit low your channel always puts a smile on my face. Keep up the great work and I cant wait to see part 3's reaction!

  • @Moricant
    @Moricant 3 роки тому +9

    One of the things I love about this film is that it works whether you assume Biff is dumb and only uses a date programmed into the DeLorean, and also works if Biff is smart enough to recognise that his life took a turn i 1955.

  • @arpod1980
    @arpod1980 3 роки тому +4

    The music in these films is so epic. It was meant for these movies. Nothing else would have fit. Best films ever made.

  • @iceman10129
    @iceman10129 3 роки тому +60

    Best sequel ever! Gah...I love everything about this film.

    • @nenabunena
      @nenabunena 3 роки тому +2

      Better than TESB or TGF2 or T2 or Aliens?

    • @Metternich_Enjoyer
      @Metternich_Enjoyer 3 роки тому +1

      @@nenabunena You can’t compare those to each other.

    • @jsmithers.
      @jsmithers. 3 роки тому +1

      @@nenabunena Not better but on par with those as a sequel. You yourself couldn't even name the best sequel hence you used 4 examples.

  • @bobblebardsley
    @bobblebardsley 3 роки тому +3

    I **love** this movie, I always thought it was so clever how well it interacts with the first 'episode'.

  • @rustyforceps1012
    @rustyforceps1012 3 роки тому +1

    1. You recognized Elijah Wood.
    2. You noticed Michael J Fox played his daughter.
    3. You knew that was Flea.
    4. Because of all that, I’m subscribing.

    • @Lumibear.
      @Lumibear. 3 роки тому

      Missed Jennifer wasn’t Jennifer, and that Marty’s Dad was a different actor too, so hits and misses, there’s soooo much to take in though, it’s nuts.

  • @gumbomudderx7503
    @gumbomudderx7503 3 роки тому +12

    They did such a crazy good job of including all the parts from the first movie into this one. This one is probably my favorite of the trilogy

  • @jean-paulaudette9246
    @jean-paulaudette9246 3 роки тому +8

    Oh, cool! It's TBR & Samantha day!

  • @PedroCastillo_1980
    @PedroCastillo_1980 3 роки тому +19

    I love Back to the Future part II for me this is the best sequel of the franchise very classic. Directed by Robert Zemeckis starring Michael J. Fox, Christopher Lloyd, Elisabeth Shue and music score by Alan Silvestri. Thank you TBR great reaction😊👍👍

  • @davidbaxley2404
    @davidbaxley2404 3 роки тому +6

    You guys are an amazing couple and your energy and enthusiasm have been an excellent escape in these trying times. Thanks for your content and keep it coming.

  • @americanfreedomlogistics9984
    @americanfreedomlogistics9984 3 роки тому +62

    Same tunnel from “who framed roger rabbit”, “Wargames” and “throw mama from the train “

    • @jeeveseventynine9263
      @jeeveseventynine9263 3 роки тому +1

      I have good memories from throw mama from the train. Need to rewatch that asap.

    • @Moricant
      @Moricant 3 роки тому +2

      Buckaroo Banzai as well - the external part at least.

    • @PatrickFoxGaming
      @PatrickFoxGaming 3 роки тому +1

      Talking about Roger Rabbit. The fellow who meets with Marty at the Cubs announcement, is the man who provides the voice for Roger Rabbit.

    • @americanfreedomlogistics9984
      @americanfreedomlogistics9984 3 роки тому

      @@PatrickFoxGaming also asked older version the character who Biff goes to get his car back after hitting the manure truck.
      “$300.00? That’s bull**it!”
      “No, it was horse**it!”

    • @Joeybagofdonuts76
      @Joeybagofdonuts76 3 роки тому +1

      Same town as Gremlins.

  • @dirtyhawkstv1575
    @dirtyhawkstv1575 3 роки тому +5

    The new Jennifer is Elizabeth Shue. She was one of the most popular actresses of the 80s and 90s. Her first film 'Adventures in Babysitting ' is a pop culture classic. She has a long list of great films including Cocktails with Tom Cruse and The Saint with Val Kilmer among many more.

  • @yoshibeckham
    @yoshibeckham 3 роки тому +39

    GREAT reaction to my ultimate favourite trilogy ! When I first watched this in 1989 when it came out, I teared up at the beginning out of the excitement .
    Once again, GREAT reaction. And you guys look so cute together !

    • @TBRSchmitt
      @TBRSchmitt  3 роки тому +9

      I can imagine! We love the trilogy so far but still have one to watch! Awh thanks so much for the kind words and the support!

    • @MapleJames76
      @MapleJames76 3 роки тому +1

      I felt the same, its so so so awesome to see someone enjoying my favourite movies too. And to see them get excited at the Nike's and Hoverboard, just wow. Back in the day it wasn't standard to set up for trilogies, so 4 years was quite a bit to wait for a 12 year old, and then to read a newspaper clipping that they were filming 2 more, Back to Back, I lost my mind lol.

    • @yoshibeckham
      @yoshibeckham 3 роки тому

      @@TBRSchmitt Thank YOU for the reply ! You guys are my favourite « reactioner » !

    • @yoshibeckham
      @yoshibeckham 3 роки тому +1

      @@MapleJames76 and I lost my mind too when I saw the trailer of BKTF Part 3 at the end of this one 😉

  • @thomaschurchwell5180
    @thomaschurchwell5180 3 роки тому +20

    crispen glover refused to play george again so they had him died. the upsidedown geoge was a different actor

    • @dewjade4897
      @dewjade4897 3 роки тому +1

      But why?

    • @Joker_JAK
      @Joker_JAK 3 роки тому +2

      @@dewjade4897 They didn't offer him enough money to return.

    • @deadbynightupbylunch
      @deadbynightupbylunch 3 роки тому +4

      @@dewjade4897 I’m grossly oversimplifying it but from questioning the script to not being paid enough compared to the other actors, Crispin and Robert zemeckis didn’t see eye to eye. This all lead to him not returning as George. When they recasted him but still used his likeness in BTTF 2 without consulting Crispin it turned into a massive lawsuit.

    • @-M0LE
      @-M0LE 3 роки тому +3

      He demanded a huge amount and then they fell out and they used his character and he tried to sue them

    • @glennwelsh9784
      @glennwelsh9784 3 роки тому +5

      @@-M0LE He didn't just try to sue them, he sued them and won. The suit set a major legal precedent in Hollywood regarding actors' likenesses being used without their permission.

  • @richieclean
    @richieclean 3 роки тому +2

    I love how they kind of anticipated that they could never get "the future" right, so they portrayed a version that was just a lot of fun.

  • @josephblumenberg6574
    @josephblumenberg6574 3 роки тому +13

    Jennifer’s reaction to seeing her future self cracks me up every time 😂

    • @Cbricklyne
      @Cbricklyne 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah, each of them was expecting the actress from the first movie.

  • @pianostrike8557
    @pianostrike8557 2 роки тому +1

    I don't know if anyone mentioned it I happen to have read the book. But the guy that tells him about wanting to go back and put money on the cubbies is the same guy that cleaned the manure in biffs car in 1955. There's so much to these movies

  • @JKM395
    @JKM395 3 роки тому +29

    This really is one of the most solid trilogy ever made. I'm still pissed off that I don't have a hoverboard yet. My whole life is a lie.

    • @jeremystevens6640
      @jeremystevens6640 3 роки тому +1

      For me it's a flying car

    • @diha9004
      @diha9004 3 роки тому +4

      yeah - Elon Musk should stop messing around with that space nonsense and focus on what's really important :)))

    • @ccricers
      @ccricers 3 роки тому +3

      Instead we get two wheeled things called “hoverboards”

    • @shanenolan8252
      @shanenolan8252 3 роки тому +3

      There is a prototype hover board and flying car ( Japanese corporations) it will be years before they come to market, Luke self driving cars the health and safety considerations, but both actually work

    • @jeremystevens6640
      @jeremystevens6640 3 роки тому +1

      @@diha9004 exactly

  • @-M0LE
    @-M0LE 3 роки тому +2

    The actor who plays biff is actually a thoroughly nice guy

    • @ironknuckle143
      @ironknuckle143 3 роки тому

      Agreed! I met him at a USO show once. He had a pretty good stand up routine too.

  • @jaipoh3965
    @jaipoh3965 3 роки тому +24

    You two are perfect with the reaction videos.

  • @tristramcoffin926
    @tristramcoffin926 2 роки тому +1

    The Cubs did win the World Series near 2015 for the first time since 1908. It was only one year off. Also, Miami (the opponent) wasn't a team in 1989 but was a few years later. Just, they wouldn't have played the Cubs in 2015 in the WS bc they are both National League.

  • @yg713
    @yg713 3 роки тому +16

    I can't wait to see your reaction to the 3rd movie. I like how you identify possible situations and ways to resolve them and so forth. You will definitely love the next one.

  • @LastTorgoInParis
    @LastTorgoInParis 3 роки тому

    Anyone else see these movies on 10/21/2015? Ii will be difficult for me to experience such joy on a single day ever again. Such is the power of love

  • @uosdwiSrdewoH
    @uosdwiSrdewoH 3 роки тому +5

    Lea Thompson is absolutely brilliant in the trilogy. Each character feels unique and distinct from the others. In the first one her 3 versions of Lorraine were identifiable by voice alone as are all the rest. She carries herself differently each time. The alcoholic mum in the first wasn't overplayed for laughs. It felt very real. This new one has a very almost pathetic way she gets around except when talking about George. I don't think she ever got or gets near enough credit for what she did with those characters.

    • @r.g.o3879
      @r.g.o3879 3 роки тому +1

      This trilogy benefited from having an amazing cast that more or less remained intact it each film except for his girlfriend

  • @thedrewsephYT
    @thedrewsephYT 2 роки тому +2

    One thing that always got me, was that Doc (1955 version) knew before he even met Marty (the one in the 80's) all about both of their future adventures from having met Marty already in 1955, so that means the Doc that goes back to 1885 knew he was going to go back to 1885 at some point in his own future. Crazy idea and notion, but yeah. There it is. Doc knew he was going to die in 1985 when he was shot and he also knew at some point he was going to travel back to 1885 as well. I always wondered what happened to the Doc with all that knowledge of future events that Marty leaves back in 1955. The version of Doc that travels back in time to 1885 is still the version we meet in the first movie from 1985, he only freshened his skin up in the future when he went. So it's weird as Hell to think about this story if you TRULY spend the time to think about it! XD

  • @ralpha112233
    @ralpha112233 3 роки тому +18

    The second and third where filmed back to back, a first I think at that time. It was done because of the time taken to film just one and to keep the characters from looking aged.
    Get ready for the best of the three!

    • @ckobo84
      @ckobo84 3 роки тому

      Why did they wait 4 years after the overwhelming success of the first one?

    • @ralpha112233
      @ralpha112233 3 роки тому +1

      @@ckobo84 I suppose because of all the sets that had to be constructed, filming, editing etc. They did it to reduce costs plus as you pointed out, four years between production, No.3 would have been roughly ten years later from the first. Trying to keep Marty looking young would have been difficult.

    • @ThePoorBoy
      @ThePoorBoy 3 роки тому +1

      Superman: The Movie and Superman II were filmed back to back in the late '70s. A bit of trivia: actor Marc McClure is in both franchises -- he played Jimmy Olsen in Superman and Marty's brother, Dave McFly, in BTTF, so he was in two franchises that filmed sequels back to back! (His scene in BTTF II was cut; Marty runs into Dave in 1985A and discovers that he's essentially gone off the rails. The deleted scene can be seen in the special features!) I like to give some love to Marc since he is a friend of mine in real life. :)

    • @ralpha112233
      @ralpha112233 3 роки тому +2

      @@ThePoorBoy Yes, your correct. I forgot about Superman.

    • @jp3813
      @jp3813 3 роки тому +3

      The 4 years after BTTF1 was due to Zemeckis being busy w/ Who Framed Roger Rabbit. The sequels were filmed back-to-back b/c they wrote a gigantic script. Part 3 was originally just the last act of Part 2. Hence, it's more like a LOTR trilogy situation.

  • @LennyCash777
    @LennyCash777 3 роки тому +4

    I like to imagine that Doc and Marty unknowingly caused a butterfly effect that somehow resulted in the future 2015 we see in the film turning into our 2015. Take hoverboards, for example. They have it and so do we, but ours are less advanced and don't actually hover. Maybe they caused technological advancement to slow down, or be redirected into other things, like smartphones. lol

    • @richieclean
      @richieclean 3 роки тому

      Except the "hoverboards" we have are only called that because of this film, so for that to be true, the film "Back to the Future" has to exist within the world it portrays. Allowing for Marty or Doc to actually watch their own lives in film form.

  • @Bejita1979
    @Bejita1979 3 роки тому +4

    I love how you guys were discussing about how Marty needed to go back in time but there's no DeLorean and how it was hurting your head lol.

    • @labyfan1313
      @labyfan1313 3 роки тому +1

      I absolutely love what they come up with to deal with that. It gives me chills if you know what scene I'm talking about. (Trying not to spoil anything).

    • @Bejita1979
      @Bejita1979 3 роки тому +1

      @@labyfan1313 yes I definitely know what you are talking about. That why I post the comment. They are missing that piece. 😉

  • @johnmosley9376
    @johnmosley9376 3 роки тому +11

    I can't wait for you guys to see Part 3! Also I've seen Last Action Hero recommended and that would be awesome! Definitely you have to embrace your inner 10-year-old to really appreciate it, but it's great!

  • @John-ct9zs
    @John-ct9zs 3 роки тому +31

    Things they got correct about 2015: Flat screen TVs, this was not around in the 80s and 90s. Multiple channels on the TV, in 1989 unless you had cable, you were limited to about 7 channels. Caller ID, this was not around in the 80s and early 90s. Videoconferencing/facetime, this was not around in the 80s and 90s, though it's been a staple of sci-fi for a long time. Some hints at social media, Needles and Marty's boss has "likes and dislikes" such as food and entertainment.

    • @charlesedward5047
      @charlesedward5047 3 роки тому +7

      And don't forget fingerprint technology for every day use: security and payments. The use of what appears to be VR glasses, or Google glasses, by Marty's kids.
      Oh, and also Miami didn't have a baseball team.

    • @wwoods66
      @wwoods66 3 роки тому

      Hoverboards? Not that the things that exist do what the movie's do, but isn't the name inspired _by_ the movie?

    • @KD-cd2ck
      @KD-cd2ck 3 роки тому +3

      And the 80s nostalgia

    • @punkem733
      @punkem733 3 роки тому

      Flat screens were known about in the 80's. it was looked at as the future.

    • @Scotdod24
      @Scotdod24 3 роки тому +2

      Drones 😁

  • @electronash
    @electronash 3 роки тому

    6:08 If you watch the doors closely, you can see where they joined two separate shots.
    It was very well done, keeping in mind that compositing using a computer wasn't really a thing back then.
    Robert Zemeckis was a master at using every type of effect he could. They used a lot of motion-controlled camera stuff in this movie that had never been done before.
    (ie. when the same actor is playing multiple parts. A lot of people somehow don't notice that Michael J Fox even plays his own daughter in the future. lol)
    There's also the part where both Biffs are in the car together in 1955, and young biff is leaning half out of the car, supposedly because of old Biff's terrible driving. But it was just a way to make it easier to composite the two shots after filming.

    • @electronash
      @electronash 3 роки тому

      A few years after I first saw this movie (so around 1992), a friend at school told me about George McFly not being played by the same actor. I didn't believe him until I got home and read the credits again. lol
      There was a lot of drama about that afterwards. Crispin Glover sued the producers, and I think won the case.
      So that set a legal precendent to prevent movie studios using an actor's likeness without their permission.
      It's a shame it ended up that way, as Crispin Glover is an amazing actor, and I think he lost a lot of work after that.

    • @electronash
      @electronash 3 роки тому

      8:00 The stuntwoman unfortunately broke her leg in that scene.
      The wire rigging or something didn't go quite to plan, so she hit the pillar and landed just outside the building.
      (instead of landing on the crash mats that were just inside the doors. Ouch.)

    • @electronash
      @electronash 3 роки тому

      13:00 One of the finest special effects shots in cinema history (for its time).
      Just the Delorean landing in the street, but the transition is near perfect considering how it was done.

  • @karlastafford9623
    @karlastafford9623 3 роки тому +4

    Considering this one was filmed in 1989 came out in 1990 in theaters They did a very good job I can't get over how much the flat screen T.V. on the wall looks like HD T.V.'S today. And Note : Michael J. Fox actually played Marty's Daughter, And Son.

  • @robertwest4596
    @robertwest4596 Рік тому +1

    Remember, cutting the same actor in the film in the same scene for more than 1 part was NOT an easy thing in 1985. We take it for granted these days.

  • @Yvo19
    @Yvo19 3 роки тому +7

    Nike has actually made those self-lacing trainers.

    • @TheSpectacularSpiderPunk
      @TheSpectacularSpiderPunk 3 роки тому +4

      Yes indeed! They made them specially for Michael J. Fox because his Parkinson’s makes it extremely hard for him to tie his laces.

    • @Yvo19
      @Yvo19 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheSpectacularSpiderPunk Cool. I did not know that. :)

    • @curtismartin2866
      @curtismartin2866 3 роки тому +1

      And they gifted them to Michael on Back to the Future Day.

  • @julius-stark
    @julius-stark 3 роки тому

    "We have hover boards but they don't hover" 🤣🤣🤣

  • @matthewganong1730
    @matthewganong1730 3 роки тому +6

    You’ll love where they take the characters of Marty and Doc in Part III. I think the second is fine but I feel like Part III is miles above it.

  • @alura5376
    @alura5376 3 роки тому

    BttF II was the last movie made with pre-digital tech to have the same actor in one shot. They exposed the film on one section of the shot, then rearranged things so the other role played by the same actor could be shot on the other side of the film.

  • @jscan4442
    @jscan4442 3 роки тому +8

    Good call stopping it when you did! Also, great reaction... you guys are so fun to watch!

  • @brickblizzard
    @brickblizzard 3 роки тому +2

    You guys are great...please don't wait too long for part 3

  • @stangroomer8846
    @stangroomer8846 3 роки тому +11

    This is one of my favourite trilogies of all time. I am so glad to see that you two are finishing out this set.

  • @thegdphrase
    @thegdphrase 3 роки тому

    Fun Fact... 8:22 .. BTTF showed The Chicago Cubs winning World Series in 2015 , the movie was off only by one year, they actually won in 2016, that's why Marty is so surprised they won in 2015 cause they were "coursed" not to win since I believed 1908 and, also, that Miami had a Baseball team... They do now. Keep the good work guys!!! Looking forward to the 3rd one!!

  • @mudejartrainingnaturalscie6938
    @mudejartrainingnaturalscie6938 3 роки тому +8

    At least they correctly predicted Zoom work meetings.

    • @PaulWinkle
      @PaulWinkle 3 роки тому +1

      Video conferencing was even a thing in 1985, of course super expansive.

    • @SimoExMachina2
      @SimoExMachina2 3 роки тому

      In Demolition Man too.

  • @SiniyLazutchik
    @SiniyLazutchik 3 роки тому

    In the post-Soviet space, the phrase appeared in 2015 - "Marty, we fucked it all up." Because flying cars have not appeared, and in general, nothing really new, except for good personal computers and multifunctional phones. But in general, life is not became better or more interesting, and maybe even the other way around.

  • @georgewilliamsiii4677
    @georgewilliamsiii4677 3 роки тому +5

    I just listened to y'all watch the first one lol
    Started with Green Mile, man that movie gets me every time.
    R. I. P.
    Michael Clarke Duncan

  • @zzzkoszzz
    @zzzkoszzz 3 роки тому +1

    Yes, that is Elijah Woods. 6:21

  • @yeoldegamer5112
    @yeoldegamer5112 3 роки тому +7

    12:15 The fact they still use Fax Machines
    In Germany Fax Machines are still used by the Government, Courts and Lawyers for legal reasons.
    Yep, some things never change 😉

    • @tulinfirenze1990
      @tulinfirenze1990 3 роки тому +3

      Same in Japan - LOTS of businesses still use them.

  • @A.I.Friends
    @A.I.Friends 6 місяців тому

    Gen X thought they would be learning how to fly cars in the future, instead we were learning how to wash our hands.

  • @Max13077
    @Max13077 3 роки тому +27

    Fantasy ...1989- "in 2015, we'll have flying cars!"
    Reality... 2015- people need to stop eating tide pods.

    • @Grnademaster
      @Grnademaster 3 роки тому +10

      The movie Demolition Man will turn out to be a more accurate depiction of the future. The way things are headed now, that is.

    • @JonathonTheAsshole
      @JonathonTheAsshole 3 роки тому +1

      Well we have auto piloting cars.

    • @Wetwilly87
      @Wetwilly87 3 роки тому +1

      @@Grnademaster Be Well

    • @Wetwilly87
      @Wetwilly87 3 роки тому

      @@JonathonTheAsshole I don’t want Taco Bell as the main fast food, Popeyes spicy chicken sandwiches are so good. 🤤

    • @goldenageofdinosaurs7192
      @goldenageofdinosaurs7192 3 роки тому +1

      Grnademaster I’m worried that the most prescient film so far appears to be Idiocracy..😞

  • @tzuyd
    @tzuyd 3 роки тому

    "Are they going to solve everything and there'll be 15 Martys and 15 Docs roaming around"
    And there's your premise for Rick and Morty :p

  • @TheBushDownTheStreet
    @TheBushDownTheStreet 3 роки тому +72

    I wish I could go back to the future and like this video more than once.

    • @TBRSchmitt
      @TBRSchmitt  3 роки тому +10

      Hahaha thanks bro!

    • @Grnademaster
      @Grnademaster 3 роки тому +14

      or the past.

    • @TheBushDownTheStreet
      @TheBushDownTheStreet 3 роки тому +3

      @@Grnademaster if one goes back to the future you could potentially be in the past

    • @sudhisira
      @sudhisira 3 роки тому

      @@Grnademaster, or as the Doc said: "Whatever!" :-)

    • @jp3813
      @jp3813 3 роки тому +3

      @@TheBushDownTheStreet You need multiple accounts, not time travel.

  • @CaptainFram
    @CaptainFram 3 роки тому +1

    The was a fun watch, I really appreciate how much you discuss the films afterward too!

  • @Wang_Monkey
    @Wang_Monkey 3 роки тому +3

    I had so many dreams about having a hover board after watching this as a kid. I even had a dream I'd worked out how to make one too! The secret to anti gravity? Bull's blood apparently! xD
    Watching this reminded me; Technically when Old Biff steals the car in 2015 he would return to the future of the alternate timeline which could:
    * Make reality change around Marty, Doc and Jenifer the moment Old Biff goes back
    *Make them cease to exist
    *Make them become stranded in that 2015...
    *Create a paradox changing the future so Biff never comes back with the almanac in the 1st place!
    (Ah time travel!)
    A small breaking of their own movie rules, but hell who cares? I only spotted it a few years ago xD Amazing movie, my favourite of the 3 though the next one is still great too, can't wait!

  • @drewtodd4471
    @drewtodd4471 11 місяців тому +2

    Thomas Wilson, who plays Biff, is apparently a super nice guy in real life. He's also a very gifted artist. The beautiful thing about these movies is everything locks in.

  • @KingOfEmptyPromises
    @KingOfEmptyPromises 3 роки тому +5

    Flea is also in Pauly Shore’s movie ‘Son In Law’ and ‘The Chase’ with Anthony Kiedis and Henry Rollins.

    • @LacieCrazy
      @LacieCrazy 3 роки тому +2

      The Chase is a good movie.

    • @jamesjoseph1249
      @jamesjoseph1249 3 роки тому +1

      He's also one of the nihilists in 'The Big Lebowski'.

    • @PChazman1
      @PChazman1 3 роки тому +1

      Also Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (Another time travel movie). Edit : My bad it was not flea but Kirk Thatcher. Still a great movie.

    • @osirispluto8782
      @osirispluto8782 3 роки тому +1

      Don't forget he also licked LSD off of Johnny Depp's sleeve in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

    • @KingOfEmptyPromises
      @KingOfEmptyPromises 3 роки тому +1

      @@osirispluto8782 Can't say that I've ever seen that one.

  • @guksack
    @guksack 3 роки тому

    They got 2015 televisions correct. I'm always stunned by that one!

  • @tylerfoster6267
    @tylerfoster6267 3 роки тому +5

    People in their 20s and 30s (I'm the latter) are so used to Christopher Lloyd looking like an old man/mad scientist, the "old age makeup" they established in the original movie (because most of the movie takes place when he's 30 years younger) kinda flies over people's heads, so the joke where he "de-ages himself" in this one is almost a non-sequitur.

    • @secularmonk5176
      @secularmonk5176 3 роки тому +2

      It's a quick line of dialogue and a one-off practical effect so that the makeup department doesn't have to apply old-man makeup for most of the movie (in the first movie, we only see "old Doc" at the beginning and the end, but "old Doc" is the character we follow for most of the 2nd film and all of the 3rd, so it saves a lot of grief to not have to age him up.

    • @tylerfoster6267
      @tylerfoster6267 3 роки тому

      @@secularmonk5176 Yeah, it's just funny to me that I bet 90% of the audience now, who has no pop culture image of a younger Christopher Lloyd, probably doesn't even notice he has old age makeup in the first movie in the first place (even though it makes perfect sense, and Glover, Thompson, and Wilson are all aged up).

  • @angelgarcia7814
    @angelgarcia7814 2 роки тому

    First time watching this video, the Nike shoes you saw are the Nike air mags. They released them in 2015 for this movie with auto lacing. They are very rare and go for $40,000

  • @DeathsjesterKMNP
    @DeathsjesterKMNP 3 роки тому +6

    Really looking forward to the reaction to the 3rd movie, it's my personal fav.

  • @eobardthawne5246
    @eobardthawne5246 9 місяців тому

    The original actress to play Marty's girlfriend is the woman boss in The Office. The 2nd actress wasn't in part 2 because her mother had cancer. The 3rd actress for Marty's girlfriend would become the most popular, she won an Oscar later on.

  • @Milleniumlance
    @Milleniumlance 3 роки тому +7

    12:36 Old Biff was in the process of being erased from the timeline, like Marty was in the first movie

    • @shanehenry7699
      @shanehenry7699 3 роки тому +1

      Interesting. I never thought of that. Why would he be erased? And also wouldn't Biff be traveling to the alternate future after he gave his younger self the book?

    • @Timothy1987
      @Timothy1987 3 роки тому +4

      @@shanehenry7699 there is actually a deleted scene that shows him disappearing... But it got cut.

    • @shanehenry7699
      @shanehenry7699 3 роки тому +1

      @@Timothy1987 That's crazy. Should have left it in.

    • @labyfan1313
      @labyfan1313 3 роки тому +1

      @@shanehenry7699 He's getting erased because his character is now being changed to the rich millionaire Biff so he wouldn't exist in this timeline anymore, in this place, or in these clothes. Then not too long after the whole setting will be transformed and this timeline will also vanish.

    • @labyfan1313
      @labyfan1313 3 роки тому +1

      Yes I never understood what was happening to him, until I saw the deleted scene. Then it all makes sense.