Being disabled this is such a beautiful way for me to see these places as I can't walk them. Thank you so much Dan you have no idea how happy this makes me 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜😢💜💜💜
@@ManchesterCowboy0161 exactly. I'd never be able to walk these places so this is amazing for me. These organisations own so much of our heritage and beautiful countryside and I understand they want to protect it but for goodness sake this is ridiculous 🤦♀️
Clipboard woman was truly vile, what a horrible entitled little person, full of her own importance and authority, basically a jumped up little tour guide, what a shameful representation of the NT
National Trust need a rethink tbh They are making themselves look a bit tyrannical. Similar attitude to the BBC imo. A corporation that believes some laws are not applicable to them.
A bit? It's clear it's their 'taught' rules, and they have managed to get away with it (clearly) but it's really showing how out of touch and 'privileged' the NT thinks they are, laws don't matter
Some people really need to get informed no incident no laws broken don’t you love a suck up looks like the NT are screwed lol looking like your going to get lots more drone footage lol😂
National Trust really haven't got a clue have they? Bad for such a large organization, that nobody in their management know public photography and airspace laws! Sort yourselves out NT.
NT Central Office in Swindon is well aware of the law in respect of public photography, and airspace regs, as proved by its written response to a FoIA request in May this year. It has had 4 months to disseminate this to those on the front line. It's abundantly clear it has failed to do so. Probably deliberately.
@@youtubeanalyst-l3z I'm well aware that the NT is not legally obliged to respond to a FoIA request, but the fact remains that it did. WTF do you think the request was about? I would have thought it was pretty obvious. Q. Can a member of the public fly a UAV over your parks if they take off / land on public property? A. As the landowner, National Trust can stipulate which activities we permit on our land but have no control over access to airspace for those flying from outside of our ownership.
The rule is that you have rights to the airspace that is necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of your land and buildings. This is often interpreted as the airspace up to a "reasonable height," which typically means the height needed for normal activities such as repairs, maintenance, or the operation of chimneys. I believe this is in common law and case history. Bernstein of Leigh v Skyviews & General Ltd (1978) was a legal case in which the plaintiff, Mr. Bernstein, sued Skyviews for taking an aerial photograph of his property without permission, claiming it was a trespass to his airspace. The court ruled in favour of Skyviews, establishing that a landowner's rights to airspace are limited to what is necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of the land and buildings. Any airspace above that reasonable height is public, and the landowner cannot claim trespass over it. This case set a key precedent in defining airspace ownership in English law.
If been led up the wrong garden path by them a few times. I just patronise them now as they do to the public. Cancelled my sub to them for sure, mainly due to staff ignorance.
@@RayWilliams-ui7gw That does not prevent them being moronic. The clipboard woman did not look like a volunteer, she had too much arrogance and spite in her.
The bloke in the van who diffused the situation was very guarded with his opinions, I like that. The terrible two were like dogs with a bone. The lady with the tablet/clipboard was a petulant child.
Agree @cypeman8037. The lady with hair tied back did point to the obvious for me in that Dan had entered NT land to access the public bridleway and in addition he parked in the NT car park. To be fair Dan did offer to pay for a ticket at the kiosk and he repeated this offer on the bridleway. We didn't see if he honored his promise. I hope so because that would be right thing to do in this situation. Of course, he could have accessed the bridleway from the village or other areas that was not the property of the NT so overall the point was a bit pedantic.
The National trust have updated their information on drones 4 days ago. It now says that drones can be flown from public land over National trust land. DJE has certainly made a difference 👍
And, National Trust land IS public land. The NT is publicly funded and is there to purchase, manage and preserve sites for the nation. They are not a private corporation owning anything.
The woman with the clipboard was so rude! 😮 Yes you were being awkward as usual, but the way she just says something to you, then turns away to Nathan and says something sarcastic to him about you!
As soon as the CAA was mentioned, the blonde lady was like, im not gonna argue about it LOL then when he said national trusts policy doesnt match the actual Law on Drones she said, leave site....she knows shes wrong but her ego wont gracefully accept it
Blah blah blah Does he hear himself How dare you look at our estate without paying us ££ She was even worse its not about visitors safety 😂 They don't get that they don't own the air space keep saying our land
How ‘stroppy’ can that woman “who sorts out the paperwork” get…. Jesus, does she chase down every single helicopter that fly’s over 😳😳😳 Dictating law that doesn’t exist ❓
If the National Trust were that precious about their sites they could always approach the CAA about making every site a no fly zone. We know why they dont...because the CAA would say dont be silly. Your NT series has been quite an education on the NT drone policy thinking it trumps the CAA and drone assist.
Caleb from Clarkson's Farm wasn't happy with the outcome was he.....so funny to see someone who thinks they have a little power, actually be shown they have zero power at all....."back to work"
I just wish that other woman was there when the guy told them he's allowed to fly. Turns out she doesn't know as much about drone laws as she thinks she does.
What absolutely grotesque entitled people,the woman was the worst and he said he’ll come and tell you to take it down,i honestly don’t know where they get told the have this power!
Love these videos mate. Would love to see you educate people more on GDPR rules and have them understand it because they always seem to think that GDPR is an excuse not too but you're a member of the public and they're working. Love your stuff
Mate you need to start telling people straight or they will walk all over you, tell them Yes i am allowed to fly it here you DO NOT own the airspace and my drone WILL be going over. Let them ring the police
He says "We have to check" Erm yep that's NOT what those two were doing at all. They were trying to take away someone's legal rights to perform an activity just because NT doesn't like it. A very very bad look for the NT right there. Hopefully they'll have learned their lesson now though I highly doubt it.
I was on a airbus a380 flying over this area, and I remember the pilot had to divert 20 miles around any national trust sites, apparently its ring fenced regardless of what the CAA say 😂
I don't know that place but if the only way to get to the public area is via their land then they can't stop you from going across. Using that as a reason is very very tiring to hear from them. If there's another way to the public path without going across their land then yes they could perhaps argue you can't do that but they can't prevent you once you're already on public land. They really have absolutely no idea of what they're harping on about. It's totally laughable. 😂
@@DJEMEDIA I think what you’re doing is great, but are you actually right, because on multiple legal advice sites(I’m not going to advertise them) They say this The lower stratum This is the airspace immediately above/around the land. Interference with this air space would affect the landowner’s reasonable enjoyment of the land and the structures upon it. You can prevent people from interfering with or intruding on this airspace. The upper This is the airspace which exists above the height which is reasonably acceptable and necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of the land by its owner - around 500 to 1000 feet above roof space level (Section 76 Civil Aviation Act 1982). A drone limit is 400feet so you come under the lower stratum?
@@macsmith6216 absolute utter rubbish, if it interferes with the enjoyment of the land , yes correct , is that 500-1000 feet ? 😂 LOL ! Above roof height is fine.
@@DJEMEDIA Ok keep yer hair on, I’m only asking because it is what legal representation is quoting JFC The Law: The general rule is that property owners typically have the right to control the airspace above their land. This principle is based on longstanding legal doctrine “cuius est solum eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos”. This recognises that property rights extend to both above and below the surface. However, the extent of the airspace ownership may be limited to what is deemed to be a reasonable height above the land.
@@DJEMEDIA Read the statement before getting it wrong 500 to 1000 is not included that’s the upper level It’s the lower lever up to this point 500 feet
"I'm not gonna do anything you want or work with you but let's extrnd thus interaction as long as possible and you keep it smiles or I'm gonna act surprised and borderline offended😂" You're the biggest troll on youtube ey Im here for ut
shocking how many businesses are clueless about the laws regarding drones, they seem to think saying "you cant fly over here" its the law! they all seem to think they own the air space, so does that mean every plane that flys over this estate etc have to get written permission from the land owner? Absolutely clueless, best thing these so called experts can ASK is "we would prefer you not to fly over our estate even though you have every right to do so" instead, they go all plastic police mode with zero clue!
Predictable exchange: "You can't fly a drone over our land!" DAN:"But it's allowed by law via the CAA." "I'm not gonna argue about it", followed by some random BS" They just can't admit they are wrong can they!!!
I know it makes a good video, the interaction and these people who have no idea what they're talking about, but if it was me I would have stood somewhere off their land flown around, used up three batteries and got in my car and went home, and the reason I would do that is because the girl saying I'll give you my email address. I wouldn't have the patience with someone like that
Its the people flexing their perceived powers that make it interesting, listen to them waffling through legislation they have no knowledge of expecting compliance.
I think the problem is that there are so many people in charge of each other, that none of them know what they are talking about, and instead, assert their power.
FYI a timming chain will out live a car if oil changes are done , Yes if your having the covers all removed it's easier to change the chain that doesn't need changing, Did the chain on your bike as a kids ever stretch?
I fly drones as i'm disabled and unable to see these beautiful places. I agree that National trust and many other places need to change their minds over the drone policy. They didn't even buy the land! They have had it donated for the use and enjoyment of the public. They don't own it! Nobody owns land it was there before us and will be there after us.. Disgusting greedy country we live in.
These days the world is full of these people full of self importance and I love to do little things that gets right on their nerves 😂😂 so this video to me is very satisfying 🤌🤌😂
I thoroughly enjoyed Mizz Grey Top's impersonation of the "I'm a little bit ooh, a little bit waay, I'm a dodgy geezer" character from The Fast Show, thinking she could "connect" with the working man.
Being disabled this is such a beautiful way for me to see these places as I can't walk them. Thank you so much Dan you have no idea how happy this makes me 💜💜💜💜💜💜💜😢💜💜💜
That is so great to hear. XX
They are all stuck up labour voters. Like the winter fuel allowance, they just aren't bothered about you.
They don't even get that these can be free promotional adverts for them, and like You, seeing places I can no longer walk around
@@ManchesterCowboy0161 exactly. I'd never be able to walk these places so this is amazing for me. These organisations own so much of our heritage and beautiful countryside and I understand they want to protect it but for goodness sake this is ridiculous 🤦♀️
That's lovely, and some of those chumps try to stop it xx !!
Clipboard woman was truly vile, what a horrible entitled little person, full of her own importance and authority,
basically a jumped up little tour guide,
what a shameful representation of the NT
@@nobodyanderson4353 And a left one as well. "I'm not going to argue with you" when she was doing nothing but and making herself look ridiculous.
she was very unlikely and was just barely tolerating DJE.
Probably voted labour 🫢
Loving the National Trust videos. They really do think they own the world, including its airspace.
me too !
National Trust need a rethink tbh
They are making themselves look a bit tyrannical.
Similar attitude to the BBC imo.
A corporation that believes some laws are not applicable to them.
A bit? It's clear it's their 'taught' rules, and they have managed to get away with it (clearly) but it's really showing how out of touch and 'privileged' the NT thinks they are, laws don't matter
As long as we are not breaking any laws we can do what we want.
Anything not against the law is classed as explicitly allowed in some laws i've been reading recently. Maybe its a general concept.
@@felixfarquharson in legal systems descended from English common law (US, UK, Canada), that is generally understood to be the case
"The police have been made aware of the incident."
Narrator: There was no incident.
Some people really need to get informed no incident no laws broken don’t you love a suck up looks like the NT are screwed lol looking like your going to get lots more drone footage lol😂
It looks like the NT have far many staff doing………..🤔……………nothing!
Have they got Risk Assessments from British Airways, Jet2, Easy Jet etc etc etc?
Or every member driving into their car parks?
When people say "im not going to argue about it" means they have lost the argument.
Right up there with "do your own research"
"I don't care how small it is " 😂😂😂
Have you pulled again....?
@@jcrosby4804 I am poor and still been told it........
@@jcrosby4804 I did.
Not fussy is she ? 🤣🤣
Not something Her Bf hears. Haha
Never talk to your ex in public, she will always disrespect ya, dude. 😂
The clipboard woman was a lesson in passive aggressiveness. Imagine working for that!
National Trust really haven't got a clue have they? Bad for such a large organization, that nobody in their management know public photography and airspace laws! Sort yourselves out NT.
They do know, just want to sell over priced brochure with THIER pics.
NT Central Office in Swindon is well aware of the law in respect of public photography, and airspace regs, as proved by its written response to a FoIA request in May this year. It has had 4 months to disseminate this to those on the front line. It's abundantly clear it has failed to do so. Probably deliberately.
@@maunsell24 I suspect they are waiting for confirmation from the pope.
@@maunsell24What was the freedom of information request about? .. The national Trust are not subject to the FOIA
@@youtubeanalyst-l3z I'm well aware that the NT is not legally obliged to respond to a FoIA request, but the fact remains that it did.
WTF do you think the request was about? I would have thought it was pretty obvious.
Q. Can a member of the public fly a UAV over your parks if they take off / land on public property?
A. As the landowner, National Trust can stipulate which activities we permit on our land but have no control over access to airspace for those flying from outside of our ownership.
Cannot kick you off a public bridleway or footpath, as they belong to the general public.
Can't kick you off National Trust land either as it's public land bought by public funds for the nation. WE own that land, they manage it FOR US.
@@johncampbell9216 NT is privately owned
Just how far up in the sky does “their land” extend? 🤣 It’s clearly hard for some people to understand the difference between land and air space.
Private land v Public airspace ? What’s not to understand?
🤔
The rule is that you have rights to the airspace that is necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of your land and buildings. This is often interpreted as the airspace up to a "reasonable height," which typically means the height needed for normal activities such as repairs, maintenance, or the operation of chimneys. I believe this is in common law and case history.
Bernstein of Leigh v Skyviews & General Ltd (1978) was a legal case in which the plaintiff, Mr. Bernstein, sued Skyviews for taking an aerial photograph of his property without permission, claiming it was a trespass to his airspace. The court ruled in favour of Skyviews, establishing that a landowner's rights to airspace are limited to what is necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of the land and buildings. Any airspace above that reasonable height is public, and the landowner cannot claim trespass over it. This case set a key precedent in defining airspace ownership in English law.
They think it extends to he edge of space lol
@@randgate- someone else that is clued up👍
@@randgate
Reasonable height is actually 500 feet
Time to ignore them
no, im enjoying this !
There's no excuse for rudeness.
These national trust employees don’t half talk some bollocks 😅
If been led up the wrong garden path by them a few times.
I just patronise them now as they do to the public.
Cancelled my sub to them for sure, mainly due to staff ignorance.
I don’t think most of these people are employees, they are volunteers.
@@RayWilliams-ui7gw That does not prevent them being moronic. The clipboard woman did not look like a volunteer, she had too much arrogance and spite in her.
They are missing a trick not selling a drone ticket
@stewartthomas7772 "yes sir, that's £1.50 please"
Now sign this contract so we can trace you and make things up after the event.
Don’t give them ideas
Why when you dont need one?!
The bloke in the van who diffused the situation was very guarded with his opinions, I like that.
The terrible two were like dogs with a bone. The lady with the tablet/clipboard was a petulant child.
Agree @cypeman8037. The lady with hair tied back did point to the obvious for me in that Dan had entered NT land to access the public bridleway and in addition he parked in the NT car park. To be fair Dan did offer to pay for a ticket at the kiosk and he repeated this offer on the bridleway. We didn't see if he honored his promise. I hope so because that would be right thing to do in this situation. Of course, he could have accessed the bridleway from the village or other areas that was not the property of the NT so overall the point was a bit pedantic.
The National trust have updated their information on drones 4 days ago. It now says that drones can be flown from public land over National trust land.
DJE has certainly made a difference 👍
Well done DJE 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻. Keep it up (in the air) 😂
And, National Trust land IS public land. The NT is publicly funded and is there to purchase, manage and preserve sites for the nation. They are not a private corporation owning anything.
I bet the NT has not apologized for the sheer arrogance and rudeness of its staff, though.
The woman with the clipboard was so rude! 😮 Yes you were being awkward as usual, but the way she just says something to you, then turns away to Nathan and says something sarcastic to him about you!
You've got to feel sorry for these folk,brainwashed with a load of bollox.
I say keep the NT ones coming. NT have a positive policy of employing snowflakes.
Wow, she’s very important isn’t she!! That important that she can even make up new laws!!
As soon as the CAA was mentioned, the blonde lady was like, im not gonna argue about it LOL
then when he said national trusts policy doesnt match the actual Law on Drones she said, leave site....she knows shes wrong but her ego wont gracefully accept it
She didn't like being overruled... did she...well, that's tough love, it's going up...outstanding result 😊
More bullshit from NT staff!
They’re like a cult all the same bull from all of them. They can’t enforce anything.
Thick, annoying people🤔Would love to see Pure Audits do this one.
The gift that keeps giving....😂😂😂
Yes
Could also be considered as harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.
I like the way you get them to declare their ignorance before you start flying.
She seems the sort that'd really care about size.
Clueless NT staff. So up themselves being ignorant of photography laws.
NT employee's and volunteers are the most uneducated so far. The lady in grey is truly awful though.
Volunteering means " I wanna be "
I'll come back in a year of two after DJE Media has visited all over 500 sites in the UK .Seen one seen them all!
Are you jealous?????
Blah blah blah
Does he hear himself
How dare you look at our estate without paying us ££
She was even worse its not about visitors safety 😂 They don't get that they don't own the air space keep saying our land
"OUR ESTATE"... bought with public funds FOR THE PUBLIC. It's public land and a public estate.
How ‘stroppy’ can that woman “who sorts out the paperwork” get…. Jesus, does she chase down every single helicopter that fly’s over 😳😳😳 Dictating law that doesn’t exist ❓
Talk about a law unto themselves.
If the National Trust were that precious about their sites they could always approach the CAA about making every site a no fly zone.
We know why they dont...because the CAA would say dont be silly.
Your NT series has been quite an education on the NT drone policy thinking it trumps the CAA and drone assist.
Considering how much land NT actually own. It's silly what they have on their books and would zone out a sizeable % of the UK.
Scabby gub ain't to pleased 😂
she used to get her way everytime 🪥
Is the last chap,the only National Trust employee that has not been brainwashed
Caleb from Clarkson's Farm wasn't happy with the outcome was he.....so funny to see someone who thinks they have a little power, actually be shown they have zero power at all....."back to work"
"I don't care how small it is". She's a keeper! 🤣
I love "I'm not going to argue" - because they can't argue anymore
I just wish that other woman was there when the guy told them he's allowed to fly. Turns out she doesn't know as much about drone laws as she thinks she does.
Do they contact and ask every plane/helicopter/hot air balloon that fly's over the same question?
They are so right about you accessing the bridleway through thier land
You could tell she was in charge by her snippy, arrogant attitude and by the lovely clipboard she was carrying.🤣🤣🤣
DJE's National Trust Tour is the gift that keeps on giving - do you have to be a patronising narcissist to work there?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience
Mark Twain
🤣
What absolutely grotesque entitled people,the woman was the worst and he said he’ll come and tell you to take it down,i honestly don’t know where they get told the have this power!
Love these videos mate. Would love to see you educate people more on GDPR rules and have them understand it because they always seem to think that GDPR is an excuse not too but you're a member of the public and they're working. Love your stuff
“I can buy a ticket for the drone..” 😂😂
Said no woman ever
Mate you need to start telling people straight or they will walk all over you, tell them Yes i am allowed to fly it here you DO NOT own the airspace and my drone WILL be going over. Let them ring the police
He likes them to dig their own hole and be proved wrong in due time. Makes it entertaining.
@@breezeblocks3817 Exactly let them keep talking rubbish 😂
It’s a subtle windup with a gotcha ending.duuu
@@charlottemann258 like i said if you dont make them realise from the start they will walk all over you. Not about been subtle
Never interupt a fool when they are making a mistake.....kinda thing ;)
Omg at least they finally had one person who knew a thing or two about drones.
I couldn't physically get to these places so thank you what beautiful places you have shown me keep up the great videos
Thanks
Lovely to see these videos of places that you would never know that existed. Brilliant work and that high boss woman was well rude
He says "We have to check"
Erm yep that's NOT what those two were doing at all. They were trying to take away someone's legal rights to perform an activity just because NT doesn't like it.
A very very bad look for the NT right there. Hopefully they'll have learned their lesson now though I highly doubt it.
So many employees blindly follow bullcrap 'rules' .... Nice niche!
I was on a airbus a380 flying over this area, and I remember the pilot had to divert 20 miles around any national trust sites, apparently its ring fenced regardless of what the CAA say 😂
Hehe 😂
I don't know that place but if the only way to get to the public area is via their land then they can't stop you from going across. Using that as a reason is very very tiring to hear from them.
If there's another way to the public path without going across their land then yes they could perhaps argue you can't do that but they can't prevent you once you're already on public land.
They really have absolutely no idea of what they're harping on about. It's totally laughable. 😂
I can see that you are going to single handedly force the NT to change their unenforceable drone rules.
Hopefully
@@DJEMEDIA
I think what you’re doing is great, but are you actually right, because on multiple legal advice sites(I’m not going to advertise them)
They say this
The lower stratum
This is the airspace immediately above/around the land. Interference with this air space would affect the landowner’s reasonable enjoyment of the land and the structures upon it. You can prevent people from interfering with or intruding on this airspace.
The upper
This is the airspace which exists above the height which is reasonably acceptable and necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of the land by its owner - around 500 to 1000 feet above roof space level (Section 76 Civil Aviation Act 1982).
A drone limit is 400feet so you come under the lower stratum?
@@macsmith6216 absolute utter rubbish, if it interferes with the enjoyment of the land , yes correct , is that 500-1000 feet ? 😂 LOL ! Above roof height is fine.
@@DJEMEDIA
Ok keep yer hair on, I’m only asking because it is what legal representation is quoting
JFC
The Law:
The general rule is that property owners typically have the right to control the airspace above their land. This principle is based on longstanding legal doctrine “cuius est solum eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos”. This recognises that property rights extend to both above and below the surface. However, the extent of the airspace ownership may be limited to what is deemed to be a reasonable height above the land.
@@DJEMEDIA
Read the statement before getting it wrong 500 to 1000 is not included that’s the upper level
It’s the lower lever up to this point 500 feet
A land owner does not own the air space above. However he can build a skyscraper. Also, land owners usually own all the soil below ground
and how deep do they own that 10 km ? or 10 meter 😂
@@zendesignerFrom where I live. All the way to China 😀
If I’m a mole, do I need the landowners permission to dig under the ground? What about if I’m a worm? What kind of license would I need?
🤣More hilarious glimpses of National Trust bonkersness - fantastic, thank you.
I want you to work with us….. as long as it’s all on our terms. 🤣🙈🙈🙈
Oh my god.
She came armed with a clipboard.
Dan, you've had it mate.
3.54 "im here hello" brilliant just brilliant
That woman at 23mins is a phyco cam see it in her eyes. Love how confident people are about something they clearly know nothing about 😂
the ground that railways are on is owned by the railways they have their own police for this reason
So, drone flying is not allowed, due to concerns for the wildlife but the NT can use drones? Make that make sense.
"I'm not gonna do anything you want or work with you but let's extrnd thus interaction as long as possible and you keep it smiles or I'm gonna act surprised and borderline offended😂"
You're the biggest troll on youtube ey Im here for ut
shocking how many businesses are clueless about the laws regarding drones, they seem to think saying "you cant fly over here" its the law! they all seem to think they own the air space, so does that mean every plane that flys over this estate etc have to get written permission from the land owner? Absolutely clueless, best thing these so called experts can ASK is "we would prefer you not to fly over our estate even though you have every right to do so" instead, they go all plastic police mode with zero clue!
Legend! Bloke in the van smashed it in seconds, told you that all was fine and the others were gobsmacked 😂.
Excellent aerial shots, shows the estate really well 👍
Predictable exchange:
"You can't fly a drone over our land!"
DAN:"But it's allowed by law via the CAA."
"I'm not gonna argue about it", followed by some random BS"
They just can't admit they are wrong can they!!!
I do some research before I watch the show. The history is always fascinating. Great subject matter and tenacity DJE!
This big 🤏
😂😂😂
i like the teasing, you know fine well you can but playing the game is kinda fun to watch hahaha good effort!
I know it makes a good video, the interaction and these people who have no idea what they're talking about, but if it was me I would have stood somewhere off their land flown around, used up three batteries and got in my car and went home, and the reason I would do that is because the girl saying I'll give you my email address. I wouldn't have the patience with someone like that
Its the people flexing their perceived powers that make it interesting, listen to them waffling through legislation they have no knowledge of expecting compliance.
Your sadly missing the point here Angus...( I say this without impacting on your neiboughs).
Without interaction there is not really a video.
LOLZ That's why you don't have 120,000 subscribers, pal.
I think the problem is that there are so many people in charge of each other, that none of them know what they are talking about, and instead, assert their power.
Totally agree with comment below, £16.50 !! to see a fraction of what you can with a drone, definitely a revenue stream opportunity for the NT here..
FYI a timming chain will out live a car if oil changes are done ,
Yes if your having the covers all removed it's easier to change the chain that doesn't need changing,
Did the chain on your bike as a kids ever stretch?
You can tell she's never been told NO before haha!
Nice aerial shots. Visited Shugborough when boating on the canal, beautiful and extensive grounds.
I fly drones as i'm disabled and unable to see these beautiful places. I agree that National trust and many other places need to change their minds over the drone policy. They didn't even buy the land! They have had it donated for the use and enjoyment of the public. They don't own it! Nobody owns land it was there before us and will be there after us.. Disgusting greedy country we live in.
Policy Police out in force again.
I’m not sure, but they feel familiar…
Great Vid I’m glad you sorted these idiots out ,
Looking forward to the video.
Time to ignore them. Your patience is admirable. Me I’m afraid would have gone nuclear in about 5 minutes 😂
One must endeavour to maintain one's politeness , decency, and composure at all times.
These days the world is full of these people full of self importance and I love to do little things that gets right on their nerves 😂😂 so this video to me is very satisfying 🤌🤌😂
Before you question authority, question the authority of that authority.
It's amazing how minimum wage tourism jockeys, become the finest legal experts when a man turns up with a camera and a drone.
Loving the NT content the organisation that keeps giving , but no doubt they’re going to have to put a bulletin out soon to all staff and spoil it 🙂
Do you have a pilots license for your drone 😂
Needs one so I can climb inside the cockpit! 🤣🤣🤣
I have no idea where you get your patience from. I'd have been telling them to do one for sure.
I thoroughly enjoyed Mizz Grey Top's impersonation of the "I'm a little bit ooh, a little bit waay, I'm a dodgy geezer" character from The Fast Show, thinking she could "connect" with the working man.
Jeez they will be staking a claim on the moon soon lol, really loving your coverage of the National Trust sites, keep up the good work
27:56 Miss Sulky Drawers 😂 The face
To be fair that guys saying come early morning for flying when they were not open yet is pretty sound
They all tried their hardest to infringe on your right but ultimately failed 😂great stuff 👍😎
The lad knows his stuff with drones 😂fair play 😊
new guy at 44 mins was coolest guy ever.
These are brilliant. You are better than DJ audits lately