What If Britain Became Fascist? | Alternate History

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
  • What if Britain became fascist under the leadership of everyone's favorite Hearts of Iron character, Sir Oswald Mosley?
    _
    #AlternateHistory #MonsieurZ #Britain
    New Videos Every Wednesday At 2:30 PM EST
    __
    Website:
    USofZ.com
    __
    Music Used:

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,5 тис.

  • @MonsieurDean
    @MonsieurDean  5 років тому +143

    Almost forgot to mention! We'll be having another upload this Wednesday at 2:30pm EST!
    Need a hold over? Watch this! ua-cam.com/video/hoSVumCEZDA/v-deo.html (It's good enough for me👌😂)

    • @novatheredwitch1573
      @novatheredwitch1573 5 років тому

      Hilarious 🤣

    • @JakubNaceradsky
      @JakubNaceradsky 5 років тому +2

      Could you make Alternative History Scenario that leads into 1984?

    • @jettherrin7770
      @jettherrin7770 5 років тому +1

      In this scenario why didn't germany and japan ally?

    • @jakefitzsimmons1213
      @jakefitzsimmons1213 5 років тому +2

      What if rasputin survived his assassination or if russia was fascist

    • @user-kt8yp5ho2y
      @user-kt8yp5ho2y 5 років тому +1

      @@jakefitzsimmons1213 He already did that Russia was fascist.

  • @johnwright9454
    @johnwright9454 4 роки тому +689

    Moseleys electoral plan (you vote for a representative in you’re person field of expertise) genuinely sounds like a good idea, I always thought it stupid when an elected MP with no knowledge of something like farming would be put in charge of agricultural policy.

    • @Sumonekool01
      @Sumonekool01 4 роки тому +58

      it does sound good, it's called a technocracy if you want to read more about it

    • @minhducnguyen674
      @minhducnguyen674 3 роки тому +51

      Germany have a different approach to technocracy. To become a candidate for election in a certain position, the candidate had to be qualified or have some certification that he's educated in the matter. I'm just surprised there are so many people who hate technocracy in general no matter the approach

    • @Jack-st2tq
      @Jack-st2tq 3 роки тому +6

      Occupational franchise in my opinion would only work in the framework of an industrial economy. There are simply far too large a variety of jobs being done with an international and cross-disciplinary attributes for something like occupational franchise to work

    • @johnwright9454
      @johnwright9454 3 роки тому +8

      Jack Nunez yeah, I was thinking how hard it would be with our current economic system, that being said I’m certainly not a fan of the current economic system.

    • @Jack-st2tq
      @Jack-st2tq 3 роки тому +17

      @@johnwright9454 Oh not at all. Exportation of production capacity and the globalisation of markets must end. The growth imperative of modern finance capitalism is destroying the nobility of work and the foundations of the nation

  • @sausagejockyGaming
    @sausagejockyGaming 5 років тому +749

    Some of his ideas on policies seem quite fitting and would likely receive decent support if voted for nowadays

    • @sausagejockyGaming
      @sausagejockyGaming 5 років тому +121

      Lowering income tax but increasing tax on products, also lowering building tax for new businesses would be better and encourage new shops, also any abandoned or unused building for x amount of years should be offered to a apsiring business paid by the government with the business just having to pay for it later when the business takes off

    • @MichaelJ44
      @MichaelJ44 4 роки тому +130

      Bradders -
      But they won’t. Because nabzi bad and zionivsm good

    • @Jay-jq6bl
      @Jay-jq6bl 4 роки тому +4

      @@sausagejockyGaming So, let's say I have a property I want to renovate or eventually demolish, but haven't got the money yet. Are you suggesting it be expropriated from me?

    • @sausagejockyGaming
      @sausagejockyGaming 4 роки тому +34

      Jason Hunt i assume you are talking about a house property which is different to a business property, but if its a business property and is not used for x amount of years its a literal waste of land and is very bad for the economy so yes i would have it bought off you, you shouldnt have bought property if you didnt have the money

    • @Jay-jq6bl
      @Jay-jq6bl 4 роки тому +2

      @@sausagejockyGaming That's not considering the state of the economy. The land could be a bargain at the time, so a good investment, but during a bad economy, further investment wouldn't make sense, due to the time value of money. You'll likely have debts to pay to cover the renovations and if the economy is bad, that's far riskier.

  • @specialunit0428
    @specialunit0428 3 роки тому +301

    Sir Oswald Mosely was actually laughed at by the Conservatives as he said that he didn't agree with the persecution of the Irish. He then left the party and joined Labour, but left after he took a wonderful idea to them and they ignored him. So, he made his own party.

    • @KingDragonBoyPrime1998
      @KingDragonBoyPrime1998 10 місяців тому

      But Sir Oswald Mosley is evil!!!

    • @user-po2qb6cm9q
      @user-po2qb6cm9q 5 місяців тому

      Labour were a socialist party then and were not going to go down the anti Semite path Moseley wished,so he left.

    • @user-po2qb6cm9q
      @user-po2qb6cm9q 4 місяці тому

      What was this "wonderful idea"__ drive Jewish owned businesses out of the country?😶

    • @idcgaming518
      @idcgaming518 2 місяці тому

      And even then, that party, the "new party" was NOT the BUF. The next one he founded - the "new new party" - was.

    • @RichardEnglander
      @RichardEnglander 2 місяці тому +1

      Mosley was a hardcore Socialist, like Mussolini was too. All these people come from Socialist backgrounds.

  • @zdrug3676
    @zdrug3676 3 роки тому +342

    Alternate title: What if we lived in a period instead of society?

    • @5nhyfiery
      @5nhyfiery 2 роки тому +12

      poggers

    • @ceccascorp8149
      @ceccascorp8149 Рік тому

      Period? I didn't understand that

    • @alexanderpavlovichromanov3065
      @alexanderpavlovichromanov3065 Рік тому +10

      @@ceccascorp8149 I believe it came from a video of Mosley talking about unemployment, in which he starts with "we live in a period..."

    • @PresidentAutumn
      @PresidentAutumn Рік тому +7

      What a time it would be if we lived in a period where politicians were actually popular

    • @sakkra93
      @sakkra93 6 місяців тому +1

      @@ceccascorp8149 It comes from a 1931 address by Mosley in which he starts "We live in a period in which politicians are not very popular." and shown in cinemas.

  • @bowlingnixon1640
    @bowlingnixon1640 5 років тому +1414

    British Union of Gamers, assemble!

    • @arturs3696
      @arturs3696 5 років тому +106

      Time to show the natives an *EPIC GAMER MOMENT*

    • @arturs3696
      @arturs3696 5 років тому +76

      @@seanurbik2689 Frickin minority, stop oppressing us.

    • @AL-sd7uz
      @AL-sd7uz 5 років тому +62

      mosley the saviour of gamers

    • @thehistorykid3679
      @thehistorykid3679 5 років тому +35

      GaMeRs RisE uP

    • @MatthewsGamingZone
      @MatthewsGamingZone 5 років тому +3

      Austria Hungary just stop ur not funny

  • @AverytheCubanAmerican
    @AverytheCubanAmerican 5 років тому +521

    I love playing as Oswald in HOI4

    • @alexh2947
      @alexh2947 5 років тому +6

      @Wilhelm II. Nah nr, it's a trade. A shorter justify time with less pp

    • @tyl2322
      @tyl2322 5 років тому +15

      @Brett Kozlak hearts of iron 4

    • @panzerscoutsmemories1152
      @panzerscoutsmemories1152 5 років тому +5

      Wilhelm II. I agree my Kaiser

    • @lechef3473
      @lechef3473 5 років тому +6

      Alexander Halpin not if you take the kings party path and then you take the focus god save the king as it removes the penalty of having less pp

    • @sirloin5479
      @sirloin5479 5 років тому +1

      Oswald has no war support

  • @legado804
    @legado804 4 роки тому +842

    we can all agree that this sounds better than our actual reality

    • @asnekboi7232
      @asnekboi7232 4 роки тому +38

      El legado creepypasta no I don’t

    • @zackarmitage9061
      @zackarmitage9061 4 роки тому +56

      A snek Boi What would you prefer?

    • @asnekboi7232
      @asnekboi7232 4 роки тому +26

      Zack A the modern timeline I may not be the best but it’s better than a police state

    • @zackarmitage9061
      @zackarmitage9061 4 роки тому +110

      A snek Boi The problem isn’t a police state, the problem is the right kind of police state.

    • @asnekboi7232
      @asnekboi7232 4 роки тому +14

      Zack A no police state is good suppression of speech sexuality and privacy is not good

  • @thenotoriousgigachad3455
    @thenotoriousgigachad3455 5 років тому +162

    Simply put! Germany proabably could have taken the Soviet Union if this happened! Hitler would have no reason to Invade the UK as Mosley would have likely cut a deal with Hitler (because Mosley wanted too avoid a WW2) and Hitler could focused all his forces on taking the Soviet Union!

    • @yroxxoyrroxyry6083
      @yroxxoyrroxyry6083 4 роки тому +71

      Hitler actually admired the British and was insistent on not going to war with them. Remember the bombing of Dresden, British and American bombing attack on German civilians. One of the worst war crimes ever. By the way, some people (rabid leftists) would try and justify it.

    • @wannabeaussie5809
      @wannabeaussie5809 3 роки тому +6

      weraboo

    • @benweaver5042
      @benweaver5042 3 роки тому +8

      @@yroxxoyrroxyry6083 Dresden isn't a war crime.

    • @D88111
      @D88111 3 роки тому +23

      @@benweaver5042 Same with the “holocaust”

    • @benweaver5042
      @benweaver5042 3 роки тому +1

      @Cringe2Win I'm not a leftist, and you don't know what a war crime is.

  • @jamesthomas5109
    @jamesthomas5109 5 років тому +491

    Big thanks from England, I'd recommend the documentary 'Oswald Mosley: Europeans' for more info.

    • @jamesthomas5109
      @jamesthomas5109 5 років тому +48

      @@zilionis8003 Exactly.
      In spirit I am with you, always.
      - Sir Oswald Mosley

    • @jamesthomas5109
      @jamesthomas5109 5 років тому +23

      @@zilionis8003 Same here, I'm more syndicalist than fascist but nevertheless hes inspiring to listen to. He was a fantastic orator, the greatest prime minister our country never had.

    • @jamesthomas5109
      @jamesthomas5109 5 років тому +5

      @Devil RedHD Up to you mate, for me its always Mosley. Powell didn't seem as revolutionary or as inspirational as Mosley, just my opinion.

    • @jamesthomas5109
      @jamesthomas5109 5 років тому +16

      @Devil RedHD I know, agreed. Anyhow I'll leave you with the one quote which sums up what Mosley wanted for the UK.
      Fascism above all, rests upon teamwork. The ability to pull together, the ability to subordinate every interest of section or individual to the nation as a whole.
      - Oswald Mosley.

    • @jamesthomas5109
      @jamesthomas5109 5 років тому +5

      @Devil RedHD Likewise, best wishes from me.

  • @Nutmegp
    @Nutmegp 5 років тому +438

    TLDR Europe wouldn't be crumbling in the 21st century

    • @Malos_
      @Malos_ 4 роки тому +19

      Europe living conditions are best in the world, I would hardly say it’s crumbling, totalitarianism would make Europe crumble just look at Eastern Europe

    • @Nutmegp
      @Nutmegp 4 роки тому +68

      @@Malos_ you seriously think that is a good comparison? Fascism and Marxist socialism are hugely different, totalitarianism isn't the same as fascism

    • @Jeejurrmgg
      @Jeejurrmgg 4 роки тому +10

      NutmegPluto please explain to me how Europe? let me guess, multiculturism and feminism? Facists are such idiots.

    • @Nutmegp
      @Nutmegp 4 роки тому +76

      @@Jeejurrmgg collapse of morality, religion, family, community. All the things our forefathers worked and bled for has been turned into a cesspit of degeneracy where our leaders have made it clear we are nothing but expendable cogs in the capitalist machine, regardless of race or gender we can all reap the benefits of white innovation and ingenuity, family doesn't matter because women should be working, religion doesn't matter because we have consumerism and hedonism. There are deliberate attempts to destroy the white race and it is being led by a very specific group of people who have historic hatred of the white race and Christianity.

    • @Jeejurrmgg
      @Jeejurrmgg 4 роки тому +4

      @@Nutmegp and what group would that be?

  • @eddysw8549
    @eddysw8549 2 роки тому +114

    A world without the Soviets, Mao and with a Europe that is actually Europe? Sometimes you just wish you had a time machine

    • @savagedarksider2147
      @savagedarksider2147 Рік тому +17

      ​@Ollie It's nothing wrong with imperialism.

    • @Darkpara1
      @Darkpara1 10 місяців тому

      And the Japanese would have been pretty badly defeated by the anglo's controlling an enormous empire. and allied with the also fascist Europe under the nazi's. The Japanese were an alliance of convenience for Hitler. @ollie9486

    • @bigpapagorge9667
      @bigpapagorge9667 10 місяців тому +2

      @@savagedarksider2147there is many things wrong with imperialism, except for if the country wants to be in that sphere and is treated fairly and humanely

    • @frogholdingmachinegun377
      @frogholdingmachinegun377 9 місяців тому +1

      What a horrible thing to say.

    • @punishedgloyperstormtroope8098
      @punishedgloyperstormtroope8098 4 місяці тому +2

      @ollie9486lgbtq??? 😂😂😂😂

  • @a05odst62
    @a05odst62 5 років тому +234

    *Moselys New Machine gang rise up*

  • @jamiekelly4663
    @jamiekelly4663 5 років тому +450

    All of Europe being formed into one superstate? Sounds familiar

    • @user-ii6cj8gi8u
      @user-ii6cj8gi8u 5 років тому +66

      Jamie Kelly And it's again ruled by Germany.

    • @chillaxo9863
      @chillaxo9863 5 років тому +58

      @@user-ii6cj8gi8u Immigrants not Germany
      Merkel can't do shit

    • @James-sh8mu
      @James-sh8mu 5 років тому +58

      And it wants to replace the population...

    • @matthew83890
      @matthew83890 5 років тому +67

      Damn, I can genuinely smell y'all's neckbeards from here.

    • @raptorcell6633
      @raptorcell6633 5 років тому +32

      A Union of -immigrants- Europeans, perhaps?

  • @SpoodDadoo
    @SpoodDadoo 5 років тому +151

    the Monsieur Z restoration! the re-uploading of old videos that have been banned, now with more facts and info.

  • @williamwolf5598
    @williamwolf5598 5 років тому +210

    Sir Oswald Mosley was a Great man

    • @vorpalspartan1463
      @vorpalspartan1463 4 роки тому +15

      William wolf seriously? That’s disgusting

    • @Dycewyfe
      @Dycewyfe 4 роки тому +20

      British Marxist Mapping Marxism is disgusting. You find progress to be appalling, because communism hasn’t gotten anywhere since the day of its appliance.

    • @CocainePirate
      @CocainePirate 4 роки тому +5

      @@vorpalspartan1463 how?

    • @vorpalspartan1463
      @vorpalspartan1463 4 роки тому +1

      Dycewyfe and fascism has?

    • @vorpalspartan1463
      @vorpalspartan1463 4 роки тому

      Get Ass that’s Nazism not Fascism, look at Italy under Mussolini

  • @Dominic.Dybala
    @Dominic.Dybala 2 роки тому +76

    Thank you for actually discussing Mosley's proposed policies! So many people who cover Fascism (British, Italian, German, and otherwise), just go "alt-Right something something anti-Communist something something authoritarian something something," not appreciating the complex political hybrid that it is. Cheers!

    • @user-ik3xt1bx2n
      @user-ik3xt1bx2n 2 роки тому +2

      Germany wasn't fascist they were national socialists

    • @Dominic.Dybala
      @Dominic.Dybala 2 роки тому +7

      @@user-ik3xt1bx2n I appreciate and agree with your distinction 100%! I actually wrote my university senior thesis on Mussolini and Italian Fascism, and it's a peeve of mine when people conflate the two, but I did it in that comment for convenience sake. Good on you for sticking up for the difference, I'm right there with you 🤜🤛😎👍

  • @generalmichaelconstantine4598
    @generalmichaelconstantine4598 3 роки тому +50

    It's important to keep in mind that Greece, already a fascistic or fascist-synapthizing state in the late 1930s, would probably join the axis, as Britain being with the allies was what kept greece in the allies (along with Mussolini). Chances are in this scenario Greece would be on the other side. That means no humiliating defeat for Mussolini - greece could assist italy in north Africa and maybe even germany against yugoslavia. It also means Germany wouldn't be so delayed with the Balkans and would reach Ukraine before winter, ultimately boosting up the Axis a lot. I'm convinced that this scenario means a definite Axis win.

  • @johnwright9454
    @johnwright9454 4 роки тому +125

    10:40 before the 1950s Britain was almost entirely ethnically homogeneous, there was essentially no immigrants to repatriate.

    • @porchofgeese_crockpot
      @porchofgeese_crockpot 3 роки тому +40

      That should be brought back

    • @porchofgeese_crockpot
      @porchofgeese_crockpot 3 роки тому +9

      @M S Up exactly. Or the UK could...re-expand

    • @porchofgeese_crockpot
      @porchofgeese_crockpot 3 роки тому +20

      @M S Messes up the Demographics, Unless it's the Americas. Whites shouldn't be in Africa either, and nether blacks or whites should be in East Asia.

    • @Kuroi_Karasu
      @Kuroi_Karasu 3 роки тому +5

      @@porchofgeese_crockpot Demographics is more than just skin colour, also according to your logic Russians and Italians and Albanians are free to live in Canada because they’re all white, even though their ethnicity and beliefs are totally different. Why are the Americas special? Why should a Brazilian of Portuguese decent be able to live alongside different groups, but in Japan you shouldn’t be able to.

    • @porchofgeese_crockpot
      @porchofgeese_crockpot 3 роки тому +19

      @@Kuroi_Karasu nah, the UK consists of England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. To each nation is their own ethnicity. It should be homogeneous. Italians should be in Italy, Albanians in Albania, but Russians are located all across the former USSR. Just like how the English are widely spread across the former empire. Plus Brazil and the Americas were end destinations of slave trades, but Japan and East Asia have a pure blood theory.

  • @sjsabattis
    @sjsabattis 5 років тому +64

    "Global Finance"

  • @imember7375
    @imember7375 5 років тому +242

    What if Rome conquered persia
    What if Spain joined the axis
    What if Japan never isolated
    What if Mexico became communist
    What if the Qing dynasty never fell

    • @hohenburg5497
      @hohenburg5497 5 років тому +2

      They switched cause an unnamed and unimportend Nation in North America forced them onto the World Stage, and Ehen you are in it, why not Stay and Meddle a bit

    • @Bluesonofman
      @Bluesonofman 5 років тому +4

      If Trotsky took over Mexico the US would invade. Though people during that time where anti war the idea of a Communist state on our southern border would not be that appealing.

    • @_-.-_-_.._--.-_-_----_-.--_._-
      @_-.-_-_.._--.-_-_----_-.--_._- 5 років тому +6

      What if Sweden joined the Central Powers after Nikolai Ottovich von Essen attacks Gotland?

    • @andirichards7371
      @andirichards7371 5 років тому +1

      @eormenraed hunferthing jesus, chill out

    • @Joisey11
      @Joisey11 5 років тому

      Mexico has gone FULL Socialist (which is pretty much the same as Communist).

  • @danceswithmetroids162
    @danceswithmetroids162 3 роки тому +224

    Sounds like Britain needs Oswald Mosley now more than ever.

    • @nordiccombatant2167
      @nordiccombatant2167 Рік тому +21

      The Greats Prime Minister that Britain “NEVER HAD”.

    • @Christian-qq5sx
      @Christian-qq5sx Рік тому +2

      ​@@nordiccombatant2167 glad

    • @SunofYork
      @SunofYork Рік тому +1

      No fascits..no Nazis ... No Zyklon B

    • @tom4381
      @tom4381 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@@SunofYorksilence

    • @SunofYork
      @SunofYork 11 місяців тому

      @@tom4381 You can silence me when your Fascist government takes over. Until then, belt up old lad coz we Normals are the overwhelming majority. It must be like 1945 for you...laugh out loud

  • @Admiral_Jezza
    @Admiral_Jezza 5 років тому +102

    Surprised this isn't (yet) banned in the UK.

    • @gothelvis3541
      @gothelvis3541 5 років тому +2

      Why would it be? Lmao

    • @scumf6862
      @scumf6862 5 років тому +61

      @@gothelvis3541 Because our country is not a free one, not anymore.

    • @towenaar4142
      @towenaar4142 5 років тому +27

      What, people realising things would have been better if we had never started WW2? Thats dangerous information for most Brits to begin to understand. Its lauded as if its the greatest thing thats ever happened, which is complete insanity when you think about it.

    • @scumf6862
      @scumf6862 3 роки тому +1

      @Taiforce Taiforce I wish

    • @andknuckles101
      @andknuckles101 3 роки тому +2

      "The war led to many technical advances" yeah, technical advances that will destroy the world by the next century

  • @Swat_Dennis
    @Swat_Dennis 5 років тому +61

    "washing its hand of global police duty"
    Something the US could learn from

    • @cinnamon_art4016
      @cinnamon_art4016 4 роки тому +3

      Something bad happens
      Reeeee why isn’t the US do something
      US intervenes
      Reeeee their foreign imperialist

  • @hellscythe-dono3628
    @hellscythe-dono3628 5 років тому +91

    Everyone else: Vox Adpocalypse oh no!
    Mr Z: D I R E C T R U L E

  • @jonsmith20766
    @jonsmith20766 4 роки тому +18

    What if Charlie Sheen had been born with 3 heads and the middle one was Chinese.

  • @Shagyamum
    @Shagyamum 2 роки тому +15

    Mosley was right

  • @Markyd123
    @Markyd123 5 років тому +22

    Why do all the people running these channels sound the same?

    • @duckmansam5046
      @duckmansam5046 5 років тому +1

      “FBI OPEN UP”

    • @SaxonExcellence
      @SaxonExcellence 2 місяці тому

      Americans don’t really have a diverse accent like the rest of Europe does. So they all sound the same to us

  • @fredricknoe3114
    @fredricknoe3114 5 років тому +52

    Reminder for The Eliot Rogers scenario, Eliot rules the waves.

    • @MonsieurDean
      @MonsieurDean  5 років тому +6

      Got a good idea of where it's going, just need a solid ending.

    • @fredricknoe3114
      @fredricknoe3114 5 років тому +9

      @@MonsieurDean Eliot banishes all the women and minorities and default dances.

    • @MonsieurDean
      @MonsieurDean  4 роки тому +3

      @FlickerEdge It sorta stalled after the Joker movie came out. I still have the script, I'm just not sure it's video ready.

    • @crqf2010ruler
      @crqf2010ruler 4 роки тому +2

      @@MonsieurDean Oh em gee, that would be so fucking cool, sorry for the expletive. That would be hilarious.

  • @thefreshprinceofbuckingham6096
    @thefreshprinceofbuckingham6096 4 роки тому +81

    Imagine how awful London would be today if the fascists would have been in control. COUGH

    • @blackassasin175
      @blackassasin175 4 роки тому +57

      Yep. It's a good thing neoPakista- i mean London was saved from the horrors that a fascist government would have inflicted upon it.

    • @thefreshprinceofbuckingham6096
      @thefreshprinceofbuckingham6096 4 роки тому +12

      @@EdgyBushMan I think you missed the sarcasm as it's clearly denoted by an upper case 'COUGH' at the end of the comment.

    • @sumrandumguy7177
      @sumrandumguy7177 4 роки тому +3

      The Fresh Prince Of Buckingham u were being sarcastic?

    • @thefreshprinceofbuckingham6096
      @thefreshprinceofbuckingham6096 4 роки тому

      Sum Randum Guy PENIS

    • @crqf2010ruler
      @crqf2010ruler 4 роки тому +1

      @@blackassasin175 OP was being ironic...

  • @lilholm9446
    @lilholm9446 5 років тому +66

    What if the sack of Constantinople never happened?

    • @fristnamelastname5549
      @fristnamelastname5549 5 років тому +6

      What if Constantinople rebuilt the Roman Empire, for 1000 plz?

  • @Table925
    @Table925 4 роки тому +55

    We may be in the worse timeline, from a British perspective anyway

    • @jackward_daladier
      @jackward_daladier 2 роки тому +4

      not for the slavs that's for sure

    • @alex-sv8ru
      @alex-sv8ru 2 роки тому +4

      @@jackward_daladier Nope. Communist rule was bad but If the UK didn't help fight Germany, the slavic peoples would have been enslaved or driven to extinction by the Nazis. Search up about "generalplan ost"

    • @GuyFierisShirt
      @GuyFierisShirt 2 роки тому +2

      @@alex-sv8ru You mean the ''plan'' that never even made it to Adolf's desk ?

    • @gumdeo
      @gumdeo 11 місяців тому

      @@alex-sv8ru Slavs are on the road to extinction right now.

  • @01_SPACE_C0WB0Y
    @01_SPACE_C0WB0Y 3 роки тому +30

    Mosley losing is insanely more significant than I ever hear people talk about.

  • @pontan8084
    @pontan8084 5 років тому +83

    5:50 Annexation of the Rhineland? You mean remilitarization of the Rhineland?

    • @mynewschannel3100
      @mynewschannel3100 5 років тому

      The annexation of Sudetenland...

    • @pontan8084
      @pontan8084 5 років тому +3

      @@mynewschannel3100 No...because on the map he is showing a highlighted Rhineland

    • @hellowelcometochillis2781
      @hellowelcometochillis2781 4 роки тому

      Rhineland wasn't already german? Its just that the germans could not put troops there, right?

    • @blackassasin175
      @blackassasin175 4 роки тому +1

      @@hellowelcometochillis2781 yes it was a demilitarized zone, so Germany wasn't supposed to put troops there

    • @TheCookieGamer523
      @TheCookieGamer523 4 роки тому +2

      @@blackassasin175 the French broke thr Treaty of Versailles by building up their military in places they shouldn't have. It's conveniently left out of history books...

  • @Clairedog12
    @Clairedog12 3 роки тому +16

    The Germans offered peace terms going so far as to say Britain could later use German troops to keep order in their Empire. Britain would acknowledge German control of the continent.

  • @Sameoldfitup
    @Sameoldfitup 4 роки тому +32

    At the 2011 census, London had a population of 8,173,941. Of this number
    44.9% were White British. 37% of the population were born outside the
    UK, including 24.5% born outside of Europe.

    • @ArturBaidi
      @ArturBaidi 4 роки тому +15

      In fascist Britain, 95% of London's population would be White British.

    • @sircoloniser5454
      @sircoloniser5454 3 роки тому

      What’s the remaining bit?

    • @oake6180
      @oake6180 2 роки тому +5

      @@ArturBaidi it would probably still have a large minority since its the capital of a multi ethnic empire, but it wouldn't be as bad as irl london

    • @Hoaxe72
      @Hoaxe72 Рік тому +3

      ⁠​⁠​⁠@@sircoloniser5454either people who didn’t answer, or are non-white but born In the uk

  • @novatheredwitch1573
    @novatheredwitch1573 5 років тому +95

    What if Tecumseh successfully united the tribes to become a North American Confederacy?
    Also, love the extra historical details of this video!

    • @novatheredwitch1573
      @novatheredwitch1573 5 років тому +8

      What if Victoria Woodhull becomes president of the United States?
      There was little recognition that the first women to unsuccessfully run for president before Hillary Clinton would have changed American history. If Victoria won the presidential election against Ulysses S. Grant, then America would be first, of course, allow women to vote even before the twentieth century.
      I could go on and on about this scenario, but my research is pretty scarce as not many people would know about Victoria woodhull. Also, Frederick Douglass would have been vice president if Victoria was elected!

    • @iregreteverything360
      @iregreteverything360 5 років тому +2

      @@novatheredwitch1573 ew, bad scenario. Only good version of this is Robert E Lee's corpse being a president.

    • @commandertaco1762
      @commandertaco1762 4 роки тому +1

      What if roosevelt was president in ww1

  • @oswaldmosley4315
    @oswaldmosley4315 3 роки тому +41

    I would make this country great again

  • @FireurchinProductionsByzantium
    @FireurchinProductionsByzantium 5 років тому +75

    What if Britian and France became fascist and the Weimar remained social-democratic?

    • @monroecorp9680
      @monroecorp9680 5 років тому +17

      This would be an interesting one

    • @gladifly
      @gladifly 5 років тому +28

      Britain and France would end up fighting each other, the result being France getting steamrolled, as the Weimar Republic would end up siding with Britain, since England and Germany are brother nations, that share an equal amount of annoymosity toward the French.

    • @dean1039
      @dean1039 5 років тому +6

      Implausible scenario. Germany became fascist mostly due to their defeat in ww1 and the debilitating reparations they were forced to pay in the treaty of Versailles. Perhaps this scenario could occur if Germany won ww1, but then it would have remained a Monarchy and the Weimar republic wouldn't have existed to begin with.

    • @xlvrstl
      @xlvrstl 4 роки тому +1

      @S K I dont get your comment at all.
      Without a strong democratic britain and france, the Weimar Repuplic would have had not been weak, and could have easily fendet off nations with half the population.
      but i guess they would have won with the power of "fascism" whooho.
      maybe you should just keep the "degenerate" for yourself...

    • @xlvrstl
      @xlvrstl 4 роки тому

      @S K 1)&2) yes. right. i assumed you already acceptet the more than stupid premise this thought experiment is based on, because you said a fascist britain/france could beat a democratic germany. and of course it would be post world war, there was no weimar repuplik pre world war.
      3)they did not vote to return to an autocratic system, they votet for a party that placet a chancellor who used a loophole to make an autocratic system. slight diffrence, but a diffrence.
      besides, how satisfied you are with your government becomes second place when people shoot at you.
      4) no dept if the one you have to pay is your enemy, and the international comunitiy would not have done anything against a rearming germany if britain or france turned fascist out of a sudden. they would have had other worries.
      also you should keep in mind the amount of nations participating in ww1 besides france and britain, its not like the USA/Russia/India/Australia would help a fascist nation to conquer a democratic one.
      and last but not least, and thats what irks me the most, you are seriously calling a flawed democratic system the degeneration of a monarchy lead by a weak, issue riddled, overcompensating and stupid monarch. could you explain that a bit more thoroughly?

  • @williamleach6195
    @williamleach6195 2 роки тому +8

    This alternate reality sounds actually like a pretty good book series if created.

  • @Au_196
    @Au_196 2 роки тому +12

    Out of all Fascist individuals in existence, Oswald is one of the most "cooperative".

  • @TheWeedIsland
    @TheWeedIsland 5 років тому +19

    I do not think Poland would have accepted the guarantee without Britain there. They would accept one of Germany's deals, be it co-ownership of the Free City of Danzig or compensation in the east in an Anti-Soviet alliance.

    • @crqf2010ruler
      @crqf2010ruler 4 роки тому

      @Alexander Challis What? Write that again but properly, and what book are you referring to exactly?

  • @Fenris77
    @Fenris77 5 років тому +28

    Awesome video.
    True Churchill was not only a boozehound he was a bloodthirsty one as well.
    And a Germany without having to fight on multiple fronts is more likely to defeat Russia, especially a Russia without lend lease.

    • @SunofYork
      @SunofYork 11 місяців тому +2

      Even a drunken Churchill found it easy to defeat you people

    • @Fenris77
      @Fenris77 11 місяців тому

      @@SunofYork Well, what he did was impress on FDR enough to get lend lease as well nowhere near as much as his precious Ruskies but enough to hang on. Remember had it not been for Göring's cock up with what turned into the terror bombing of London the RAF would have been spent at huge losses to the Luftwaffe but still.
      Had Mosley been in the parliament instead of Churchill the war would have been totally different. Germany might have been forced to pick a side between Japan and UK... Or not...
      OH, BTW I am Swedish not Deutch.

    • @SunofYork
      @SunofYork 11 місяців тому

      @@Fenris77 Well any country that spawned Agnetha can't be all that bad. However, in your scenario you conveniently miss out the Germany/UK alliance gassing million of Jews and subjugating much of Europe into having the Fascist characteristics of single party government. acquiescent government dictated courts, and ONE male leader which would not have been Churchill but Adolph... You have excellent English and a silken tongue, but you are selling shoddy Fascist goods

    • @Fenris77
      @Fenris77 11 місяців тому

      @@SunofYork I did that on purpose. Fascism/Nazism would have made Europe a slaughterhouse even without massive military activities.
      And now we have a new fascist regime(s) in the east like Nazi-Russia lumbering around though thanksfully nowhere near as competent as Nazi-Germany and monkeychatter-upstart country Italy.
      No I am not selling fascism as I do not like dictatorships or even authoritarianism one bit regardless of ideology. Whether it is political (Fascism, Communism) or religious (Islam). The latter still wants to kill every Jew in existence and subjugate every other human... Communism is still lingering despite the fact it lost the Cold War (Also 100+ million deaths and counting).
      Besides any such tightly ethnocentric empire is doomed to fail as soon as any reason for an alliance goes away. I'd give Nazi-Germany until the 1070s at most before it starts collapsing in earnest. True before that millions will have simply "disappeared" or "never existed" (Russian favourite bullshit for their own genocide against for example Ukrainians).

  • @purpledevilr7463
    @purpledevilr7463 3 роки тому +35

    Do you know what’s insane, I personally developed an ideology similar to the industrial democracy of Oswald.
    I’m amazed at this.

    • @thedalekprince6118
      @thedalekprince6118 2 роки тому +7

      as I like to say "ideas can't be destroyed, they can only be forgotten until someone comes up with the idea again." although it would most likely have another name to the original.

  • @sustaingainz7856
    @sustaingainz7856 3 роки тому +6

    Whoa the worker shareholder plan is cool

    • @D88111
      @D88111 3 роки тому

      Fascism has only been left wing economically

  • @tomAS-27
    @tomAS-27 2 роки тому +15

    Many of his ideas, possibly all of them, would most likely be supported nowadays by the British People. They would also, as you’ve stated, prevent the rise of communism and wokeness.

  • @jackfeist1193
    @jackfeist1193 5 років тому +10

    2:52 chad mosely

  • @ianholland8092
    @ianholland8092 Рік тому +5

    We would be in a better position

  • @danieltsiprun8080
    @danieltsiprun8080 5 років тому +41

    Honestly what would happaned if france and Britain moved troops in the Rhine land. Because i think hitler ordered his troops to retreat if they saw allied troops, didnt he?

    • @danieltsiprun8080
      @danieltsiprun8080 5 років тому +5

      @Sakkra101 i wonder what would happen if the french had some balls and upheld the treaty of Versailles.

    • @jacobsxavier6082
      @jacobsxavier6082 5 років тому +1

      @@danieltsiprun8080 well, guess that the english were in the same alliance

    • @danieltsiprun8080
      @danieltsiprun8080 5 років тому +3

      @@jacobsxavier6082 yes but the english didnt had troops in france at that exact time frame the BEF was still in Britain so it was up to the french to react first. With the British coming to back them up.

    • @jacobsxavier6082
      @jacobsxavier6082 5 років тому

      @@danieltsiprun8080 there have been months of what was called 'la drôle de guerre' (between the declaration of war and the blitz on France) before the blitz came. That period is when the allies just stayed on the maginot line without doing anything.
      You're telling me that none of the british forces were able to do anything on land nor on sea ?
      It looks more like they were as willing as the french to start in another world war shitshow which, sarcastically enough, made everything worse.

    • @MegaTamer111
      @MegaTamer111 5 років тому +6

      That is correct but out of context. That was the order that was given when Hitler moved military forces to the Rhineland which breached the treaty of Versailles. This was a period where Germany wasn't at war with the France/Britain whereas you're giving the essence that this was during the invasion of Poland when the western front was quite in comparison and most referred to this period as the "phoney war" where France/Britain didn't really do much even though they were at war with Germany

  • @masonsmith6312
    @masonsmith6312 5 років тому +14

    Wonderful video, Monsieur Z. I hope you can keep making videos as long as you enjoy making them. Keep up the good work!

  • @Thatonedude082
    @Thatonedude082 5 років тому +37

    What if the allies actually attacked Germany during the "phony war" period?

    • @Richard-zw9sl
      @Richard-zw9sl 5 років тому +1

      Berb Merley best offence is the best defence

    • @krazytroutcatcher
      @krazytroutcatcher 5 років тому +1

      I’m sure they were doing it by sea from the ‘off’.
      I recall reading something saying approximately fifty German merchant vessels were sunk in the first six months from September 1939.

    • @spitfirefrench
      @spitfirefrench 5 років тому +1

      Based Spurs fan

    • @commandertaco1762
      @commandertaco1762 4 роки тому

      @@Richard-zw9sl no, best defense is a good offense, except in asia

    • @blackassasin175
      @blackassasin175 4 роки тому +2

      @GazB French attacked Germany to attempt to draw some troops away from Poland; they figured if Germany thought the French were invading they would take some pressure off of Poland, of course Germany did not fall for it and ignored the French provocation.

  • @jessestempher6039
    @jessestempher6039 5 років тому +19

    What if Tsar Nicholas II was assassinated during the Otsu incident in 1891?

  • @danieldelaney1377
    @danieldelaney1377 4 роки тому +42

    i would love if this is how it actualy went

  • @thehistorykid3679
    @thehistorykid3679 5 років тому +14

    History channels: exists*
    UA-cam: hahaha NO!

    • @raptorcell6633
      @raptorcell6633 5 років тому +3

      History is fact, and fact hurts feelings. *DELETE IT*

  • @toadfaceass
    @toadfaceass 5 років тому +59

    TLDR: We keep the empire and have peace on earth. The planet colonises the moon in the early 90's.

  • @therope340
    @therope340 5 років тому +15

    Churchill was a warmonger.

    • @nordicwarrior2176
      @nordicwarrior2176 3 роки тому

      True

    • @alex-sv8ru
      @alex-sv8ru 2 роки тому

      And? He fought against a fascist state. He was truly our best PM.

    • @therope340
      @therope340 2 роки тому

      @@alex-sv8ru You're never going to make it.

  • @EASbear
    @EASbear 2 роки тому +3

    Plot twist: you came here from the Rebuild Party. 🦁🇬🇧

  • @aryslav9239
    @aryslav9239 4 роки тому +18

    Basically a better world.

  • @thewessexbretwalda5865
    @thewessexbretwalda5865 4 роки тому +15

    I wish! Long live Mosley

  • @LaurusHG
    @LaurusHG 5 років тому +81

    Mosley did nothing wrong.

    • @blackassasin175
      @blackassasin175 4 роки тому +37

      Mosley was right

    • @crqf2010ruler
      @crqf2010ruler 4 роки тому +11

      But he indeed did nothing wrong.

    • @theredtechnician
      @theredtechnician 4 роки тому +6

      Technically correct as Mosely did nothing substantial

    • @LaurusHG
      @LaurusHG 4 роки тому +1

      @@theredtechnician True.

    • @wannabeaussie5809
      @wannabeaussie5809 3 роки тому +2

      i mean you cant do anything wrong if you were never in power

  • @benh5366
    @benh5366 5 років тому +17

    What if Churchill wasn’t the prime minister?

    • @novatheredwitch1573
      @novatheredwitch1573 5 років тому +3

      That was the point of this video. Churchill didn't become prime minister of this timeline. Sorry if I'm being a little rude. I just love history.

    • @benh5366
      @benh5366 5 років тому +1

      Sarah Grimm Yah I love WW2 history but I meant in how Churchill was about never surrendering. What if it was someone else who gave up after the fall of France or accepted one of Hitlers many peace offers. I think Churchill new he could win the war if he could get the US in the war like WW1.

    • @blackassasin175
      @blackassasin175 4 роки тому +12

      It would have been better off. Churchill was a drunkard and a warmonger, Germany had no quarrel with Britain specifically and even praised Britain as brothers. France and Britain could have been spaired had they just helped work out a deal with Poland and Germany instead of convincing Śmigły not to talk with the Germans and then the French going behind Germany's back to sign deals with the soviets.
      Ultimately, it was this war that, although Britain "won", would cost Britain their empire, countless lives, and destroy the future of Europe, and it was allegedly all started to "save" a country (Poland) which they ended up letting the soviets conquer anyway, such a needless waste of European life.

    • @howardhamlin7386
      @howardhamlin7386 4 роки тому

      To refine the question a bit, what if Neville Chamberlain didn’t die of cancer in 1940?

  • @TheBlackAndDeckerBootyWrecker
    @TheBlackAndDeckerBootyWrecker 5 років тому +20

    Why is there never a part two to any of your most interesting timelines?

    • @BudokaiMan-mr9tw
      @BudokaiMan-mr9tw 3 роки тому +2

      He wants us the viewers to come up with our own conclusions on how we think this scenarios should end.

  • @unregierbar7694
    @unregierbar7694 Рік тому +4

    Looking modern day western European cities... something went horribly wrong. It´s not how it´s supposed to be.

  • @HighFlyingOwlOfMinerva
    @HighFlyingOwlOfMinerva 5 років тому +5

    May I suggest something?
    - What if Juan Péron never rose to power or was removed from power?
    - What if Jorge Videla never came to power or was removed from power?
    - What if Augusto Pinochet never came to power in Chile?
    It would be cool to see this happen. Been watching all the censored video's you made via VPN. Keep on rocking, Monsieur Z!

  • @sherlock9397
    @sherlock9397 5 років тому +7

    I am British and I would honestly love this if this happened but It didn’t I wish it could have but I know it will never happen unless time travel or different universes or dimensions

  • @davidmcneill7403
    @davidmcneill7403 5 років тому +4

    Nicely done. One of your best to date and worth the wait. That k you for expanding outward and looking down the road a little bit to the consequences of the changed events a little farther.

  • @rokball4892
    @rokball4892 5 років тому +16

    What if Stalingrad and Leningrad also North African front were fallen by Germany?

    • @mongolicious7858
      @mongolicious7858 5 років тому +6

      would probably be the same outcome

    • @raptorcell6633
      @raptorcell6633 5 років тому +2

      Even IF the Reds lost Stalingrad and Leningrad that wouldn't be enough. By 42 the Reich was desperate because they knew that if they took any longer the might of a continent was going to come crashing down upon them. All that would happen is that the war would last longer, Italy would fall to the Soviets due to Operation Husky not being possible and the Western Allies would probably get further into Europe.

    • @mongolicious7858
      @mongolicious7858 5 років тому +1

      Why would Russia sign peace just because they lost Moscow, they’d probably move the capital to Kazan and continue the fight

    • @mongolicious7858
      @mongolicious7858 5 років тому

      Got any source to back up that claim? Im too lazy to search for myself

    • @gladifly
      @gladifly 5 років тому +4

      If England sided with the Reich, as we were suppose to, then Russia wouldn't have stood a chance against the full might of Britain and Germany.

  • @nastyhardcore7641
    @nastyhardcore7641 3 роки тому +5

    What an interesting idea for industries to elect representatives. I suppose in a way we have this through lobbyists and lobbying. However I somewhat like the idea of the direct representation and perhaps the limitation of those representatives to impact other "lanes"

  • @Meadaa
    @Meadaa 4 роки тому +3

    Fascism is the only way

  • @Greninjia
    @Greninjia 5 років тому +17

    Can you do what if Elizabeth I had married
    Or
    What if Bhutan became an empire

    • @crqf2010ruler
      @crqf2010ruler 4 роки тому

      Wym with "if Bhutan was an empire"? They're an empire. And I for one welcome our new Bhutanese Overlords.

  • @barbarossa1983
    @barbarossa1983 Рік тому +4

    We wouldn’t be in the 💩we are now

  • @justinspeaks.1652
    @justinspeaks.1652 5 років тому +12

    Hoi4 United Kingdom campaign, Kings Party Route: The Video

  • @RoccoArgubright
    @RoccoArgubright 5 років тому +15

    “Despite how poorly the strategy worked in the past” even though Germany forced Russia to surrender in 1918 in WW1

    • @blackassasin175
      @blackassasin175 4 роки тому +2

      Yeah Germany is epic. You guys usually lose the war but only after taking on the entire world all at once. It is a good point though, Germany in ww2 did NOT want a war on two fronts, they tried hard to make a peace deal with Britain but Churchill the warmonger wasn't interested, Churchill just wanted to destroy Germany at all costs.

    • @Reinhard_Erlik
      @Reinhard_Erlik 2 роки тому +2

      @@blackassasin175 Yk what The British were the bad guys not the Germans. They just wanted their lands back but the british couldnt have any of that.

    • @DonaldRichter0
      @DonaldRichter0 2 роки тому +1

      @@Reinhard_Erlik The nazis were a corrupt regime, they were racist, wanted to wipe out a race, dominate the world, and kill anyone who doesn't agree with their intentions, and your telling me Britain is bad? Churchill did the right thing because he knew hitler was up to no good and would start a world-wide European war, and invade countries like there's no tomorrow. If you support nazi germany, and think they were the victim, there is something wrong with you. And if they really wanted their land, they wouldn't invade the soviet union with a peace treaty towards each other. You're lying out of your teeth, and fingers, and you know it.

    • @DonaldRichter0
      @DonaldRichter0 2 роки тому +1

      @@blackassasin175 Churchill knew hitler had more intentions than "Re-claiming land," remember the eastern front?

  • @joesmith8701
    @joesmith8701 3 роки тому +7

    this was based

  • @lucaslevinsky8802
    @lucaslevinsky8802 3 роки тому +6

    We live in period

  • @sssfsfdfsdsdffsfsdf4
    @sssfsfdfsdsdffsfsdf4 5 років тому +6

    you do have to take into account that the entire basis and foundation of the mannhattan project was from the British tube alloys project. So without the alliance between the US and the British there would have been no reason for the British to hand over their research to the Americans like they did in real life. So the British would likely develop the nuke before the US simply because they were ahead in their research.

  • @FUnazis
    @FUnazis 5 років тому +9

    Steady as she goes? Nah;
    A CHANGE IN COURSE!!!

  • @JohnSmith-1066
    @JohnSmith-1066 5 років тому +3

    I like your style. Good amount of information with minimal opinions. A good change from the usual WW2 commentator.

  • @adamhenrywalker
    @adamhenrywalker Рік тому +6

    Oswald Mosley is good.

  • @bourboncask4089
    @bourboncask4089 4 роки тому +4

    I mean, look at London now and you have your answer.

  • @shadowmoon6782
    @shadowmoon6782 5 років тому +4

    Sir Oswald Mosley: Supreme Gamer, prime minister of the Gamer Kingdom, and leader of the British Union of Gamers

  • @binozia-old-2031
    @binozia-old-2031 5 років тому +5

    At first when I heard the voice I thought that this was AlternateHistoryHub

  • @thomasnorman8369
    @thomasnorman8369 4 роки тому +10

    I think his proportional representation for professions is smart - it reminds me of the representation of guilds in City of London and also observed in Singapore.

  • @aaronsimkin5084
    @aaronsimkin5084 3 роки тому +8

    A return to fascism is what the UK desperately needs.

    • @alex-sv8ru
      @alex-sv8ru 2 роки тому

      What a deranged cunt, you are. We need less fascism not more.

    • @SunofYork
      @SunofYork Рік тому

      Zyklon B fanboy ?

  • @Jackie_Hiero
    @Jackie_Hiero 4 роки тому +5

    National focus complete: The kings party

  • @spyroscheliotis5366
    @spyroscheliotis5366 5 років тому +8

    1) What if the Library of Alexandria was never destroyed ?
    2) What if the Aztecs and the Incas had dinosaurs to use in battle against the Europeans ?
    3) What if the Brazilian Empire never fell ( this is a scenario for one of my books that I'm working on )

  • @theromanbaron
    @theromanbaron 2 роки тому +6

    Hail Mosley!

  • @daredgobbo4535
    @daredgobbo4535 5 років тому +11

    What of Japan joined the Central powers in ww1

    • @Bluesonofman
      @Bluesonofman 5 років тому +1

      Da Red Gobbo It wouldn’t do much unless the US also joined the Central Powers.

    • @crqf2010ruler
      @crqf2010ruler 4 роки тому

      @@Bluesonofman It would do though, Japan wouldn't ever pose a threat to USA, nor would the army take Manchuria.

  • @Richtofenfan
    @Richtofenfan 2 місяці тому +1

    Oswald was of the opinion of basically keeping Britain out of any wars, because he like many other old Victorians saw the empire as being ill. That’s what he was wanting to do, if Hitler took Poland he’d have done nothing much. But if France was next maybe he would have, balance of power is key for the empire at the time.

  • @theemperor6413
    @theemperor6413 3 роки тому +13

    If Mosely came to power Northern Ireland would probably be given to Ireland as he saw it as Irish and he respected the IRA

    • @oake6180
      @oake6180 2 роки тому +2

      It would have certainly secured better relatioms with Ireland

  • @tyrssen1
    @tyrssen1 2 роки тому +15

    Mosley was the greatest Prime Minister that Britain never had.

    • @SunofYork
      @SunofYork Рік тому

      NO TO FASCITS ! NO to Nazis

    • @stequality
      @stequality Рік тому

      ​@@SunofYorkbut you support fascism

    • @SunofYork
      @SunofYork Рік тому

      @@stequality If devoting a big piece of my time to eliminating fascists and Nazis is a fascist and Nazi activity, then you are right. However I have never wished to harm Jews or promote a one party state, so you are back in 1945 with your success rate. You will need to brush up your act if you are to make gauleiter

    • @stequality
      @stequality Рік тому

      @@SunofYork not talking about ww2 era or 1930s Germany

    • @SunofYork
      @SunofYork Рік тому

      @@stequality I am talking about the 1930s because today's Nazis/fascists are talking just the same.. 'blood and soil' and hating on the Jews, calling immigrants animals and vermin. etc.. We have heard it all before and seen it all before and I, and the hundreds of millions of 'Decents' will not let it happen again... Google 'Babi Yar wiki' and read it. They shot 33,370 men, women, girls boys and babies over 4 days

  • @RealAugustusAutumn
    @RealAugustusAutumn 4 роки тому +4

    So basically the world is better off

  • @Spoggers1
    @Spoggers1 4 роки тому +2

    Oswald was a true gamer

  • @danielmoncaster3216
    @danielmoncaster3216 Рік тому +4

    Policies that are good for the native British man?

  • @01_SPACE_C0WB0Y
    @01_SPACE_C0WB0Y 3 роки тому +2

    8:22 this is unironically a great idea

  • @korawega6293
    @korawega6293 4 роки тому +4

    You know what some of moseleys reforms don't seem half bad

  • @kaihiggins725
    @kaihiggins725 Рік тому +4

    why does this version of life sound better lol

  • @ocks3623
    @ocks3623 5 років тому +6

    What if Harold Godwinson won against William?

  • @Gg-qx3vo
    @Gg-qx3vo 5 років тому +5

    *Oswald Mosley has entered the chat*

  • @mathieuleader8601
    @mathieuleader8601 5 років тому +4

    when the first Harry Potter book was released JK Rowling was accused of having facist leanings due to Harry's lightning bolt scar being Mosley's political groups marker.