If you love live cash games, this guy is PERFECT! I'm a (serious) recretional player at my local casino (montreal) and I can tell you that his podcast and crush live poker videos helped me so much. I pretty much crush 1-2 (not a huge achievement but whatever) and I'm a small-medium winner at 2-5.
Bart, you are the best thing to happen to live poker training EVER. Seriously, I've learned so much from your podcasts and videos it's ridiculous. Keep up the good work!
I've played about five sessions of live 1 2 NL over the span of 3 years or so. Your CP articles are great because I wish to be a winning 2 5 player; nothing more. Maybe if I have millions one day I can take a shot at 5 10 or higher, but until then you and Ed Miller are my two favorite CP columnists.
for someone who's played live a ton after having watched this I actually quite like the commentary and think for the most part it's spot on. The straight draw vs AA is good play by what seems like a reg (Igor) that I've also employed to some success. Most of my earnings came from people who overplay or downright misplay their monster PP (not to mention people who've lost few pots and are on major tilt but that's obv).
great analysis, this just reaffirms my thoughts on certain situations. Glad to see players still making consistently poor decisions at $2-5. I play $1-3 but am a long way off bankroll wise before being able to move up.
my problem with the "raise/fold" idea with queens on the dry flop with 5 limpers is that you are turning your hand face up and if the guy with 2 pair has any sense, he might smooth call and try to trap, especially if it was top two or a set and not bottom two.
You were discussing Igor's hand against the aces. I agree that the 40bb bet was a mistake and Igor should have just shoved. I think if villain raised all in Igor still has a call and it all goes in anyway. In this case, as you said, he loses essentially the minimum. Igor may have been hoping that he'd induce the shove, but bad players make similarly bad mistakes that sometimes end up saving their ass.
I agree and like most of your theory Bart, however, every poker hand is situational. I do not believe you account for that enough. His reasoning for always being a fan of slow playing in that QJ situation is not always justifiable, usually depends on who your betting/checking to. Great point about sizing and optimizing value, so true in the long run.
Good stuff. I do have to say that the one hand that I disagree with you is the combo draw with the Ace on board and a lead. In most cases, I agree that the play with the combo draw is to either check raise or to raise the lead. In scenarios with Ace high boards x/r or raising when lead into, a couple problems arise. One is that you have a lot less fold equity, second issue is you can get blown off your equity which is disastrous. Some may say that you can't get blown off your equity because its a call, but overall you're doing very poorly against villains range when he puts in the 3 bet or shoves on you. It goes back to board texture as you stated many times in this video. Do I go to war on a 793 board with a combo draw? Hell yes, because its so hard for them to have a strong enough holding and you have an immense amount of fold equity, plus your actual equity in the hand will normally be higher vs a villain lead.
Guys I found a Lotto Crusher System that helps me to win my first lotteryheree is the link ==> twitter.com/a9c60516d47d92b7a/status/742626059930198016 Crush Live Poker by Bart Hanson Live Traaaaining Video
seems like a small raise there on the first hand wouldn't price out any primary draws, especially something like 10c-Xc...not sure i get that sizing..but you did have the ace of clubs, so perhaps that factored in there?
16:40 his bet of 200 is not a mistake some low stacks player spatially middle age guys are ok with calling as long as they have some chips left but if you put them all in they start to think cos they dont want to bust and go home.
35:10 wouldn't it make more sense to actually check-raise the turn here? my thoughts: 2 situations for check-calling the turn: 1. you check river, he checks (money made) 2. you check river, he bets, you fold(money lost) 1 situation for check-raising the turn: you check-raise turn, he folds (money made) my logic says that the raise would be more profitable.. it's very very unlikely that he slow rolled a bigger pocket pair,am I missing something?
Bart I have a question on something you say in your hand against Stan (KJ v. JJ) about perceived table image. Do you have any material on how to gage what other people think of you and how you can use that to your advantage? I am 21 and I look every bit the age or younger, so I often get the remark that I must be a LAG internet player. But in reality, I am very much a TAG player. At what point does my initial perceived image as a LAG wear off especially when my play is to the contrary?
I found it very hard to follow your lines of thought and reason. I don't know if you are speaking too fast or the fact that the audio and video were recorded separately but it was like a glass wall was between your rationale and my comprehension.
If a person has no idea how much is in the pot if there is a mass of chips. What makes you think they will consider pot size even if its whites? I mean if you aren't savy enough to keep track you probably don't change that behavior when it's easier to calculate. Just my two cents.
+l3oto cause of pokerstars database, on that flop AJ beats AA in 73% of hands, since will always go a jack on the turn and one on the river. sadly in poker live, online pokerstars statistics dont apply...
In your commentary about straight versus AA. Do you really think the guy with AA would have been willing to go broke with such a marginal hand? What I mean is, would a shove by the player with the straight be a "deal killer" where as the $200 bet gave him the psychological out that even if he calls and looses he still has chips to play?
nice video. do you think you maybe missed value in that KJ hand? i mean, you narrowed his range reasonable, but due to his turn bet sizing you did weight his range more towards TT-QQ than a flopped set, right? don´t you think it would have been worth it bet/folding 150 ish otr to try to get some confusion/fk it calls? you also seem to autoassume 90% of your player pool are donks ;) you don´t worry too much about getting exploited, don´t you hehe
9:53 "Now I am never really a proponent of slowplaying, or anything like that, cause I think alot of times it kills your action and does more harm than good" 13:10 "I'm always a fan of slowplaying, but I think the times that you can check-raise are the times that the draws don't alway come in.. Another example of results orientated poker "training"...cmon bro seriously?
i disagree, with a 200 riv bet against the guys AA. villian could have played a set and got aboat on the riv. ud be betting 200 right into it. i would value bet between 100-150 that way he did get aboat we can still get away wiithout losing much
Not certain about the points made but ,if anyone else wants to uncover how to play poker game try Jaffacter Poker Secrets Coach (just google it ) ? Ive heard some unbelievable things about it and my partner got cool results with it.
This guy is a donk. Does he have any big wins or large sums under his belt? He scares of the only hand with equity on the first hand, the guy was making a feeler bet and he told him all he needed to know with the re-raise. He contradicts him self several times as well. Wish commentators would stick to commenting on what happen and not what they think should happen.
Why do you only show when you win with Aces,but you show another guy losing with Aces when your not in the hand.Why are you not showing any hands your Losing with.Another Guy that likes to hear himself talk.
Daric Rupp The quote at 13:08 was meant to say "I am not always a fan of slowplaying" which is why I then said "I think that the times you can check and then raise".
If you love live cash games, this guy is PERFECT! I'm a (serious) recretional player at my local casino (montreal) and I can tell you that his podcast and crush live poker videos helped me so much. I pretty much crush 1-2 (not a huge achievement but whatever) and I'm a small-medium winner at 2-5.
Bart, you are the best thing to happen to live poker training EVER. Seriously, I've learned so much from your podcasts and videos it's ridiculous. Keep up the good work!
I've played about five sessions of live 1 2 NL over the span of 3 years or so. Your CP articles are great because I wish to be a winning 2 5 player; nothing more. Maybe if I have millions one day I can take a shot at 5 10 or higher, but until then you and Ed Miller are my two favorite CP columnists.
for someone who's played live a ton after having watched this I actually quite like the commentary and think for the most part it's spot on. The straight draw vs AA is good play by what seems like a reg (Igor) that I've also employed to some success. Most of my earnings came from people who overplay or downright misplay their monster PP (not to mention people who've lost few pots and are on major tilt but that's obv).
This is a software program you can try out that will win you over 90% of your bets and make you over $5,000 monthly online - *MoneyQuick.info*
Christina Cook fuck OFF.
Hey Bart, was looking for a crush live poker video on UA-cam and I found this. Thank you so much for uploading and I'm hoping for more.
Cool tips - thanks for sharing the info. I gotta watch this later a few times.
Thanks for the video. Appreciate your time, efforts, & transparency.
this is awesome, thanks mate. any plans to do any more of these?
great analysis, this just reaffirms my thoughts on certain situations. Glad to see players still making consistently poor decisions at $2-5. I play $1-3 but am a long way off bankroll wise before being able to move up.
You wern't worried about Tom Dwan on your left?
Do you not read? That's not Tom Dwan. It's Igor Someoneavic
@@okiepokertraveler1718 you had 6 years to realise that was a joke which went over your head
I love playing poker but can't stand it when someone talks about hands and pots but you Sir. I could listen to you talk about poker all day.
my problem with the "raise/fold" idea with queens on the dry flop with 5 limpers is that you are turning your hand face up and if the guy with 2 pair has any sense, he might smooth call and try to trap, especially if it was top two or a set and not bottom two.
This video is very good, Do you have more videos like this?
You were discussing Igor's hand against the aces. I agree that the 40bb bet was a mistake and Igor should have just shoved. I think if villain raised all in Igor still has a call and it all goes in anyway. In this case, as you said, he loses essentially the minimum. Igor may have been hoping that he'd induce the shove, but bad players make similarly bad mistakes that sometimes end up saving their ass.
very nice analysis.. appreciate your video.. thanks a lot
I agree and like most of your theory Bart, however, every poker hand is situational. I do not believe you account for that enough. His reasoning for always being a fan of slow playing in that QJ situation is not always justifiable, usually depends on who your betting/checking to. Great point about sizing and optimizing value, so true in the long run.
at 36:30, you were supposed to move..the river card 6c made possible straight,so Stan might think you are bluffing.He has to call.
you do understand that in a casino they use a card shuffler and two separate decks that they rotate after every hand.
I like that you say that you've made a mistake even though you won the hand.
Good stuff. I do have to say that the one hand that I disagree with you is the combo draw with the Ace on board and a lead. In most cases, I agree that the play with the combo draw is to either check raise or to raise the lead. In scenarios with Ace high boards x/r or raising when lead into, a couple problems arise. One is that you have a lot less fold equity, second issue is you can get blown off your equity which is disastrous. Some may say that you can't get blown off your equity because its a call, but overall you're doing very poorly against villains range when he puts in the 3 bet or shoves on you. It goes back to board texture as you stated many times in this video. Do I go to war on a 793 board with a combo draw? Hell yes, because its so hard for them to have a strong enough holding and you have an immense amount of fold equity, plus your actual equity in the hand will normally be higher vs a villain lead.
Guys I found a Lotto Crusher System that helps me to win my first lotteryheree is the link ==> twitter.com/a9c60516d47d92b7a/status/742626059930198016 Crush Live Poker by Bart Hanson Live Traaaaining Video
seems like a small raise there on the first hand wouldn't price out any primary draws, especially something like 10c-Xc...not sure i get that sizing..but you did have the ace of clubs, so perhaps that factored in there?
16:40 his bet of 200 is not a mistake some low stacks player spatially middle age guys are ok with calling as long as they have some chips left but if you put them all in they start to think cos they dont want to bust and go home.
35:10 wouldn't it make more sense to actually check-raise the turn here?
my thoughts:
2 situations for check-calling the turn: 1. you check river, he checks (money made) 2. you check river, he bets, you fold(money lost)
1 situation for check-raising the turn: you check-raise turn, he folds (money made)
my logic says that the raise would be more profitable.. it's very very unlikely that he slow rolled a bigger pocket pair,am I missing something?
on the last hand (TJ vs A8), what if he check raises you on the turn?
really great stuff man...
Bart I have a question on something you say in your hand against Stan (KJ v. JJ) about perceived table image.
Do you have any material on how to gage what other people think of you and how you can use that to your advantage?
I am 21 and I look every bit the age or younger, so I often get the remark that I must be a LAG internet player. But in reality, I am very much a TAG player. At what point does my initial perceived image as a LAG wear off especially when my play is to the contrary?
awesome! Thank You for the video
sorry if you have mentioned this before, but how did you get the hole cards of the other players?
Bart? I know it's an old video, but when you fold QQ to this raise, is his raise a good play if he's getting over pairs to the flop to fold?
The hand starts at 39:15
I found it very hard to follow your lines of thought and reason. I don't know if you are speaking too fast or the fact that the audio and video were recorded separately but it was like a glass wall was between your rationale and my comprehension.
How you know what their hole cards are?
If a person has no idea how much is in the pot if there is a mass of chips. What makes you think they will consider pot size even if its whites? I mean if you aren't savy enough to keep track you probably don't change that behavior when it's easier to calculate. Just my two cents.
I want to know why Alan was in the hand with 9 2 suited...
The first hand.. on the flop.. why is AJ at 73% and AA at 18%? Or is that just a mistake on where the percentages are placed?
+l3oto cause of pokerstars database, on that flop AJ beats AA in 73% of hands, since will always go a jack on the turn and one on the river. sadly in poker live, online pokerstars statistics dont apply...
are u actually thinking this while playing or are you analyzing your play afterwards?
why AJ has 73% and AA 18%???
Makes no sence...
*sense
Back door flush draws
lol, looks like they assign percentages incorrectly
AA 73% AJ 18%
very good video
Looks like Igor did pretty well too!!
Bart shooting angles?
in the beginning how is AJ 73% when AA is ahead but shows 18&? i dont get it
How do you avoid the 2?
Very first hand not sure why the guy leads with K10 into three players, I check call
i was wondering that too!
i dont see a poket cam.. how r you capturing opponents hands?
jimbij007 RFID Technology
how do you only have 18% equity in the 10 high flop with aces?
what are you writing down???
4 callers with aces oh you played that right
In your commentary about straight versus AA. Do you really think the guy with AA would have been willing to go broke with such a marginal hand? What I mean is, would a shove by the player with the straight be a "deal killer" where as the $200 bet gave him the psychological out that even if he calls and looses he still has chips to play?
similar thought processes, but certainly not so deeply
the second AA dealt were the same suits as the previous hand as well. poor shuffling by the dealer.
Getting away from those Qs was an interesting hand.
The johnatan guy is brutal
Gambling, even with Poker, is still very risky.
Win 95% of all your bets and make over $700 per week with this free software here:
poofdollars.info
Wow camera technology in 2013!! People took video with potatoes.
nice video. do you think you maybe missed value in that KJ hand? i mean, you narrowed his range reasonable, but due to his turn bet sizing you did weight his range more towards TT-QQ than a flopped set, right? don´t you think it would have been worth it bet/folding 150 ish otr to try to get some confusion/fk it calls?
you also seem to autoassume 90% of your player pool are donks ;) you don´t worry too much about getting exploited, don´t you hehe
Wow... watching this video makes me realize that I HAVE NO IDEA what I'm doing in this game, ha ha.
You're Awesome, sister.
yea that's a mistake. the numbers for aa and aj are reversed.
You guys have so much fish. Where I live, when you play 2/5, everyone knows what they're doing
Where is your poker material?
how the hell he knows what they have?
Never chase a flush with a paired board
9:53 "Now I am never really a proponent of slowplaying, or anything like that, cause I think alot of times it kills your action and does more harm than good" 13:10 "I'm always a fan of slowplaying, but I think the times that you can check-raise are the times that the draws don't alway come in.. Another example of results orientated poker "training"...cmon bro seriously?
i disagree, with a 200 riv bet against the guys AA. villian could have played a set and got aboat on the riv. ud be betting 200 right into it. i would value bet between 100-150 that way he did get aboat we can still get away wiithout losing much
That guy with $75 was dead money. He must have lost a couple stacks. And going home if loses the $75.
Looking at the percentages of winning hands I see the best hands as underdogs. Ummm No
Thanks for the great vids! One request, please don't wear underwear at the table. Just a little too casual...
Less talk more poker!!!!
blh blh blah could would should this video blows
Seriously, a tee shirt? You should really think about taking some of your poker winnings and buying better clothing. Still, thanks for the vids.
Yes poor shuffling by a dealer who deals for people who play with allot of money and is on TV and first 2 cards are dealt sepperatelly
Kinda blurry, poor quality production.
seriosly
i would wreck this guy
Not certain about the points made but ,if anyone else wants to uncover how to play poker game try Jaffacter Poker Secrets Coach (just google it ) ? Ive heard some unbelievable things about it and my partner got cool results with it.
This guy is a donk. Does he have any big wins or large sums under his belt? He scares of the only hand with equity on the first hand, the guy was making a feeler bet and he told him all he needed to know with the re-raise. He contradicts him self several times as well. Wish commentators would stick to commenting on what happen and not what they think should happen.
Bart's a successful professional player. This is much more than you can say about yourself.
aj 73% to win...uhhh?
Why do you only show when you win with Aces,but you show another guy losing with Aces when your not in the hand.Why are you not showing any hands your Losing with.Another Guy that likes to hear himself talk.
9:53 and then 13:10 This is a complete contradiction..only took you four minutes..Are you a goldfish bro?
lmao "most interesting hand in the week" is just a big suckout, and he is proud
i stopped watching once you showed your first hand was aces teach people to play 87 off and maybe youll get more credibilty
Jonathon is a scrub
9:56 im not a proponent of slow play 13:08 "i am always a fan of slow play" lmao what a joke haha
Daric Rupp The quote at 13:08
was meant to say "I am not always a fan of slowplaying" which is why I
then said "I think that the times you can check and then raise".