Matthew McConaughey SHUTS DOWN Joy Behar After She Asked This One Question
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 бер 2024
- #theview #politicalnews #election2024
The View's discussion where Matthew McConaughey shares views on gun control, refusing to be pigeonholed into extreme positions. Joy Behar's query on being "anti-gun" highlights polarizing narratives in politics, with McConaughey advocating for responsible gun regulations and nuanced discussions.
#theview #politicalnews #election2024
Cancel the View please
100%
It is canceled. It's being privately funded to stay on air
It should be called "The Spew".
Yes! Cancel the View.
It is the most popular show of its kind on daytime TV and it would be stupid to cancel it.
Sorry you can't handle watching some intelligent, with it women interact with a complaining Big Star actor who is too much of coward to state his views on the very subject he claims to be so concerned about.
He said all I need to hear - "we need red flag laws". How about we enforce the thousands of laws on the books and stop letting criminals walk in society with law abiding citizens.
Red flag laws, like the one in Colorado, is nothing more than gun confiscation because the legal standard to remove the gun is 'a preponderance of the evidence' but in order to have the weapon returned, the arguments have to meet 'beyond reasonable doubt' standard. I will be nearly impossible to prove a negative beyond reasonable doubt. This is a violation of Second Amendment rights. Imagine a teenager who got grounded for something, calling to implement red flag confiscation just to get even. It doesn't take much of an imagination to see that happening - in fact it did happen in Colorado. Those laws tend to be a PC term for confiscation.
Exactly hes being argumentative with them to appear a better choice...all while their ideals and goals are 💯 the same
If you asked a mass shooter "if red flag laws had been in place would they have stopped you"? In a moment of of honesty he would laugh, and say "Are you really this stupid?".
The current President's son is an example how contemporary law is followed
@@marcblank3036 exactly
Joy looked a little scared like she knew that she pissed him off. Lol
😂😂 I wish he checked whoopi...she needs a little fear in her 😂
I’d love to see someone scare her so bad she’d break into tears & pee herself right there.
la ja ja ja are you scared joy?
@@NothingWasted You want to intimidate Whoopi Goldberg? Are you one of those people who sends anonymous threatening messages to TV personalities?
@@silviamoffat6903 He producer probably told her to back off, the deal with McConaughey was that they wouldn't discuss that on this occasion.
Gun laws and red flag laws don't apply to criminals. That seems to be a fact that these people don't seem to grasp.
Amen, brother.
Don't be deceived . "They" *understand* it PERFECTLY . Why do _you_ think they put SO _MUCH_ *EFFORT* into crafting the cover-lines - the *LIES* they hide their agenda behind , in an effort to make those lies SEEM (sound) "Reasonable" ?
They don't grasp ANY fact! They make "facts" up!
Well said my friend
We don't use guns in Europe. Forbiden. And we have far lesser crimes by firearms than You do. 🤷
Glad he shut her down.
Because he’s too dumb to come up with an actual answer.
He didn't...he cowardly refused to answer a direct question, because he knew the answer would make him look bad.
@@ThresholdGaming - ... and he couldn't have his TRUE agenda exposed on "national" TV . It would eliminate ANY future public and political viability for him .
@@ThresholdGamingI don’t quite agree, he was saying that her question was not one that he could answer yes or no. He’s a Texan at heart, walking a fine line between keeping the door open in Hollywood and not pissing off his fellow Texans.
This was back before Sunny Hostin found out she was actually of Spanish descent and was related to slave owners.
Karma is a beautiful thing.
As she benefited from slave ownership she IS slave owner
As a Non American please explain to me how race works over there. So according to Liberals Europeans are bad because of colonization even though many groups like the Irish and Polish never took part in it yet the Spanish did. Now somehow 200 years later Irish/Polish get blamed for slavery and colonization while Latin Americans who move to America don't get the same if any blame even though their ancestors from Spain did kill millions of natives and enslave millions. Just because their empire failed and now they're poor.
So in 2024 Irish/Polish = bad
Spanish decent= victims .
who cares, is she to be held responsible for what her ancestors did... way to go keeping the divide alive. I have an ancestor who has a statue in Sri Lanka, guaranteed he had slaves, do I care? Not at all, he did what was acceptable in his time. Am I anywhere near embarrassed, hell no! Again he did what he did in HIS TIME, not mine. As an Aussie of British heritage, I have a convict in my ancestry as well. Im more proud of him and my irish/scot ancestry than I am of my other ancestry. We convicts may have been sent to hell, but we call it paradise, cant complain about that. From the hell of colonisation, we were blessed with beautiful lands, appreciate what ur ancestors went thru to give you a better life instead of holding a dead flame and forcing responsibility on those alive today. Everyone has skeletons and dead horses in their history.... build a bridge n get over it.
@@CQuinnLadyOK, remember that the next time you (or any of your friends) discuss "reparations".
I am not my ancestors, and I will not pay for their sins.
Anyone that believes more laws will stop the people who dont obey any laws is clueless in my opinion
Most people obey most laws most of the time.
"Criminals" stop at red lights. They put money in parking meters. They pay the rent. They pay for groceries. They don't attack people 99 days out of a 100, and probably even less than that.
Most gun owners obey most gun laws most of the time. This includes people who may, from time to time, use guns for criminal purposes.
The idea that there are people who never obey any laws is just crazy.
Gun control laws are not meant to stop everyone from committing any crime. That is impossible. They are designed to reduce the number of guns, and reduce access to them, so they cannot be used as much. This would reduce the number of victims of gun crime or accidents, and thus save lives.
What is so terrible about that? It's what most countries do, and they have a lot less gun crime than the US.
Let’s have more regulations, yeah!! Matthew is carrying water for Hollywood guised as a red state guy. Think he’s a complete sham!
Exactly. He didn’t win my vote I’ll tell.you that. He sounded half queer to me. That’s what living in California does to a Texan.
I understand but it's not the laws. The laws slowly change the culture. Just ask us in Australia. We've done it and it worked beyond any shadow of doubt. It shifts the economic availability of weapons generally and yes it ultimately reduces lawless people's access to them. I mean at some point someone has to recognise that countries with stricter laws have less gun violence.
@@duncanharvey2209Excellent points!
You could see Matthew's absolute disdain of Joy, well done Matt!!!
That show attacks guest..but none of them got knowledge or resurch..just read cards..can't belive the she is still going
He shut down Clown Joy
She got scared too 😂😂
But then he continued talking. We have laws. Laws don't prevent school shootings. What will is someone there with a gun while the police are 15 minutes away.
Joy Behar's spend too much time on irritating games or insulting people more than anything. She is why I quit watching the View many years ago...
@@Kika1623 What that was was not answering the question. That in and of it self was playing politics. What they hell is he talking about?
If your going to raise the age to 21 ,, what are you going to do with the 18 year old in the military
Especially when there’s talk of bringing back forced military service!
Intoduce an exemption for the military
I grew up when 12 year old boys owned guns and treated them responsibly. I knew where my dad kept the guns, and the ammo, unlocked, and knew that I’d better have a good reason to go near them. We were taught to respect the guns.
That's easy: exempt anyone who is in the military from that age limit.
@@LeeZaslofsky So 18 to 20-year-olds are old enough to use a gun to protect the country, but they're not old enough to use a gun to protect themselves or their family. Yeah, that makes sense🙄
NO exemptions. We either raise the adult age to be able to move out of parents homes & join the military to 21, or we keep it the way it is. Those young adults that move out on their own, have the right to protect themselves also...
I'm weary of red flag laws because they are open for abuse. I don't think you should be able to red flag someone anonymously. The accused has the right to know who made the complaint and to know exactly what was said.
And if it is discovered that the accuser made false statements then that person should face fines and jail time.
The right to face your accuser is one of the best bulwarks AGAINST this atrocity 👍.
When Cain killed Able with a rock, they didn’t blame the rock…
"They"? Who are "they"?
If Cain had not had a rock, he might have struck Abel and not killed him. The rock gave him the power to kill. Like a gun.
They meaning us. The reader. Or God in particular since he later lays judgement on Cain.
The rock didnt give Cain more power. The power in Cain's motivations to kill Abel were there before a rock was even in his hands.
He was jealous, and angry. God had earlier asked him why he was upset and depressed, and that if he did right, his heart would be accepted by God.
His response immediately after is to suggest taking Abel out into a field with nobody around and to kill him.
In fact, my translation does not even actually mention a rock. It just says " and im paraphrasing" that instead of listening to God, he suggests going out into the wilderness to Abel, and he attacks Abel and kills him. @@LeeZaslofsky
@@enochadamson7801 All this biblical exegesis in order to make the point that the implement used to kill someone is NEVER important, only the intention and mood of the person who uses it.
In other words, the solution to crime is a general improvement in morality, which we pray for and preach about, realizing, however, that we live in a sinful world, and cannot do away with sin, only pray about it and preach against it.
In other words, there's nothing we can do about sin, so let everybody buy a gun because there will always be "criminals" out there to defend against. And merely reducing the danger is not worthwhile, because there will still be sin in the world, no matter what we do.
So let us pray, brethren, for the Return of the Lord, who will cleanse the world of sin, and make it unnecessary for people to buy guns.
This is pure superstition, shaped to increase the profits of the gun industry.
@@LeeZaslofsky Your viewpoint is kind of going around in circles. So I agree with everything up until you are saying that there will always be "criminals" to justify using a gun.
In the context of Cain, Abel was not an enemy or a criminal. He was his brother.
Jesus' followers carried swords.
If I go camping in the woods, I bring a shotgun. Because there are bears, and mountain lions in the areas I go camping in. And there wont be civilization for miles.
If someone breaks into my home, im armed. I can defend myself.
But to act like everyone has guns so they can start justifying their use to make everyone an enemy sounds like you know nothing about firearm enthusiasts, and dont own a gun yourself for the very reasons you listed. You are worried what you will do with it.
So for you, it sounds like your mental health is in check. I wouldnt recommend firearms for you.
But since I dont go to work, or a grocery store or to the beach and carry a gun, and mainly use them for shooting ranges or camping or hunting, you have 0 authority to tell me what I have or shouldnt have.
Next you are going to suggest I shouldnt have tools like a saw, an axe or a hammer in my shed because they can hurt people.
Or my car because it can run someone over.
If you dont want a gun, dont get one. Just dont tell others how to live their lives.
Besides. The ones that harm others with guns purchase them illegally and scratch serial numbers off so they arent traceable.
Im not going to pray for a world with no guns, either. Considering I like using them to shoot targets on weekends and its a hobby.
@@enochadamson7801 You repeat the usual crap we always hear from gun enthusiasts, about lonely expeditions deep into the woods, an intruder breaking into your home, and on and on. You even throw in the myth that Jesus's followers had swords, forgetting what Jesus SAID ("Those who live by the sword shall die by it") and pretending that he was a forerunner of the gun nuts of today.
Only five percent of Americans ever go hunting. But the other ninety five percent are supposed to defer to them and not make any gun regulations that might make their hobby less enjoyable.
Your speculations as to my mental state are typical right wing hogwash, your way of demeaning me because I dare to disagree with you. And no, I am not a student of firearm owners, and I have no need to be in order to express an opinion on the gun plague that afflicts the US.
Most Americans do not own guns. Gun owners are a minority in the US. Those who own more than one gun are a minority of that minority; and those who own five or more guns are 29 percent of gun owners, a minority within a minority within a minority. Yet gun policy in America is controlled by this minority, and the gun industry that supplies and profits off them.
Then we get to the argument, much prized by the gun nuts, that only "criminals" are worth worrying about, not "law abiding gun owners". They tell us that "criminals" pay no attention to the law, so there is no point in passing gun controls.
This is like saying there is no point in legislating against murder, because murderers won't pay any attention to such a law. And it's foolish to pass laws against burglary, because burglars won't obey them anyway. Rape? Pass all the laws you want, rapists will still rape. In any case, laws mean government, and we all know that government is bad.
The fact is that many of the mass shooters we hear about are "law abiding gun owners" who suddenly become "criminals" when they use their legally obtained firearms to mow down a bunch of kids in a school, or shoppers ins supermarket, or concertgoers, or university students, or people gathered for worship, or just anyone that happens to be walking down the street when the recently "law abiding gun owner" passes by and shoots them dead.
Many of the deaths and injuries in the home, where weapons are kept to deal with an "intruder" (by killing him? death penalty for trespassing?), occur because "law abiding gun owners" get so angry with their wives that they can see no alternative but to shoot them dead. "Law abiding" gun owners sometimes leave their guns around the house where kids can get them, and sometimes little kids find them and "play with them", killing someone. And I won't dwell on the tens of thousands of Americans who use guns to kill themselves, partly because ti's so easy to do it with a gun, whereas taking pills or jumping off a tall building are more complicated.
Gun nuts tell us that the solution to all this is to train gun owners to be more responsible, and to ruthlessly hunt down and arrest or kill all criminals. The fact that the US has by far the largest number of people in jail of any country on earth, to the point where the number exceeds the total of the next ten countries COMBINED, seems to have failed to have any effect on the number of gun deaths in the US. I guess that just means the US has not been ruthless enough in dealing with its "criminals".
I don't think it's necessary or fair to ban all guns.What is needed is sensible gun regulations, enforced seriously, with the object of reducing the number of guns in America (estimated at 440 million for an adult population of about 249 million, only 44 percent of whom live in homes where there are guns, and only 32 percent of whom own guns themselves).
In order to do this, I believe it's necessary to repeal the Second Amendment, which has been perverted into a sales slogan for the gun industry. I agree with former Chief Justice Warren Burger, a Nixon appointee, on that.
Once the Second Amendment has been repealed, it will be possible to pass sensible gun regulations such as exist in most countries similar to the US, and, over time, see a major reduction in gun deaths. The goal should be nationwide regulations, seriously enforced, aimed at reducing the number of guns in circulation and banning assault weapons completely. A plan whereby gun owners could turn in their guns and receive a payment has worked well in some places.
I continue to believe that the passion for guns among some Americans is a remnant of Slavery, the Indian Wars, and Jim Crow, and is mainly a passion for white supremacy disguised (unconvincingly) as a love of "freedom" and a "need" for self defense in a nation with 18,000 police forces. (Freedom from what? Black rule. Self defense against what? Black "criminals" and rioters.)
Why would anyone go on there?
why would anyone with a brain watch?
I’m conflicted between good on him for trying to change the minds of idiots and why go on that show and engage with idiots
He's a lefty.
He's an anti-2! leftist. The only reason he messed up by going on there is that she disclosed that to anyone watching. He was trying to look like a good ole' Texas, pro-2A boy.
Because their is always that one person who thinks that finally I will reason with this person and show them the error of their thinking. And THAT is the mistake. "INSANITY CAN NOT BE REASONED WITH." Now the majority think that insanity is relegated to hospitals, asylums and straitjackets. Oh no! No way. Insanity is amongnst us as well but if one can not identify it then one will be the effect of it. FACT. Most on the view are insane but the "social system" props them up until that crumbles and then one can see who cowers into a corner and cries with the hollow of the night. Good luck.
What we need is responsible politicians
We could use more good people too. And competent people. And people who are doing their best. I can think of other empty verbiage, but I hand it back over to you, since you seem to have plenty more where that came from
Then vote *MAGA* . ALL else is a façade .
Responsible politician is an oxymoron, just like moral politician.
@@SWest00072Who elects these monsters of immorality not once, but time and again?
No one forces people to vote for crooks and fraudsters like Trump, yet they do so in great numbers. They even send this "very very rich" guy their hard earned pocket change.
So WHO is corrupt? The politicians or the people who keep electing them? Or both,? They're all out to make a buck while being treated as "important" by the rubes and hicks in their home districts.
😂
That’s a joke, right?
No red flag laws period!
EVERY thing he listed is against the Constitution.
You sound like you could use a red flag yourself.
Absolutely Agree! 💯
Only a fool would think Red Flag Laws are a good idea.
We all have someone who would love to inconvenience us... They would not hesitate to call and make something up so that we would have to deal with the embarrassment, the therapists, cops, judges, paperwork, lawyers...
But whats even worse, many of us have someone dangerous we have tried to get away from.
And they would love to render us defenseless for a nice long weekend so they could come after us.
Ex husbands,, wives, bf/gf...
Their new husband, wife, bf/gf...
Ex in laws....
Unhinged family members.
You name it. Red Flag Laws are just too easy to abuse.
And since bad guys don't really follow the law, it wouldn't lower a single statistic or save a single life.
(In fact, I'd be willing to bet RFL would actually cause MORE deaths, injuries, and crimes - but not less.)
LeeTalmudeen
Thank you for embodying the exact commie attitude that makes these RF laws reprehensible and anti-constitutional.
Berg, Baulm and Stein
It’s the same AshkeNAZI last names every time
Treat Mark-cysts SOYcialists and cummies like it’s 1945 again.
@@LeeZaslofsky - Yeah , can't have that pesky "Personal Freedom" thing . Can't have LIBERTY standing in the way of the next Trans mass-shooter , or the next BENIGN Governmental EDICT .
What did he think was going to happen by going on The View? Why does any intelligent thoughtful person even go on that show?
Matthew wants to infringe around and find out? Red flag laws? Waiting periods? Waiting periods only made sense when we relied on snail mail. Red flag laws are blatantly unconstitutional.
Some red flag cases are justified. It is a flawed system though. Many cases of abuse out of spite or revenge
I don't even think felons should be denied the right to buy a gun. If you're off parole, that means you're done your time. If you they wanted to make a period of time between your parole end date and your ability to buy a gun, that would be okay with me.
I got a felony at 18 for stealing $200 from my dad via forgery. He pressed charges. I'm almost 40 and in my state, the only way to get your 2nd Amendment Rights back is to be pardoned. That's next to impossible. So in other words, because I did something stupid at age 18 (like, 3 months after turning 18 too), I had my right to bear arms taken from me for the rest of my life. Unless I somehow end up being able to move out of state to one that isn't insanely backwards.
While I won't say which one, it's one of the states that changed the voting laws and machine, the day before the election in order to rig Biden into office.
@@darthollpheist1156I agree. Especially if it was a non-violent offense.
@@darthollpheist1156 That's exactly what I'm always saying! If you've committed a crime but you've done your time and paid your fines, then your debt to society has been paid.
If they don't think you're safe enough to have a gun, then they shouldn't have let you out anyway.
My son made a stupid mistake a few weeks after his 18th bday, too... Now he can't even be around a gun- and that's just dang near impossible in a state like ours! (Tennessee).
My son didn't hurt anyone either. He did do something stupid and broke in and took a jar of coins from a neighbor. But he and his friends wanted to try Xanax and someone had gotten some.
Xanax made him act out of character and make bad decisions. He's 23 now.
He only spent like 10 days in jail over it. But it's considered a "felony", so... no gun. 🤷🏼♀️
@@inthelandofmorethansmall7582Yeah, I feel for your son. To this day, my dad still acts like he did the right thing. While I'm not saying I condone theft, or even that I shouldn't have been charged..... the issue is that he went to the DA on behalf of my girlfriend and talked them into lowering her charges to a misdemeanor. But, not for me.
Still, I did what I did. I'm not saying I shouldn't have gotten in trouble. But I was barely 18. At the time, I wasn't thinking about future issues like finding a job or owning a gun. I just wanted to get high. (over 20+ years off heroin, now).
I've never had a violent crime charge. I've never been in trouble after getting off dope. I go to church, pay my taxes, and support the police. I don't see why there's a law that says felons can't have guns.
Let's put it this way, before I got off dope, I had no issue carrying a gun. Now that I want to follow the law, I don't because prison sucks.
I feel like the ALL gun control laws only hurt people that don't want to break the law. A criminal (especially younger ones) don't think twice about carrying a gun. Hell, if I really wanted to, I know of a few spots in the city (I live in the suburbs now) that I could go to and probably have a decent hand gun within a few hours. But I don't, because I want to follow the law to stay out of prison.
Gun laws literally make no sense to anyone with sense.
He still doesn't understand the, shall not be INFRINGED part.
That clause is SUBORDINATE to the need for a well regulated militia. It is not a universal god given right (only white men with property were allowed into the militias), but a practical method of addressing the need for national and local defense; and it was also a way for whites settlers to steal and drive away Indian ladies
You don't understand the "Well regulated militia" part. And that's the important part. No one EVER thought, back in those days, that what they were talking about was a nation of 330 million people (many of them kids) and 400 million guns. Nobody!
The most blatant, unmistakable of all laws and they want to act like its something other than what it clearly states...
@@LeeZaslofsky "well regulated" means well equipped, and "militia" is the PEOPLE. Meaning everyone. So actually, it's YOU who doesn't understand english.
@@LeeZaslofsky
It's obvious that YOU don't understand the "well regulated Militia" part.
The 2A doesn't say, "You can only have guns if you're in the military and that military has to be controlled by the government."
It says. "BECAUSE A WELL REGULATED MILITIA of h
The People is NECESSARY to protect against all threats, foreign and domestic, the right of the People to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED."
How would it even make sense for us to protect ourselves if the government decided who van and can't have a gun? Are we supposed to ask permission, "Hey before you become tyrannical, do you mind giving me a gun so I can stop you?"
Go read the 2nd Amendment. Pay close attention to how it's worded.
And the order of the wording.
It's the difference between "Try Not To" and "Not TRY TO".
The order of the wording changes the meaning.
It does seem odd that one of the most bitter women on television is named "Joy."
😂😂
Can't believe he went on that garbage
He's not a right wing jerk like some people. You?
@@LeeZaslofsky He's not a left wing pussy like some people. You?
Good actor, nice guy, could not get elected in Texas. He's been drinking the kool-aid way too long.
Tainted by association with Hollywood. I couldn't vote for anyone who appears on The View, at least in recent years.
Thank God. Don't need another politician. Once you go down that path you have no choice but to sell out and eventually compromise. Respect for the dude.
I must be thirsty... 🤔
KoolAid sounds good right now!
I haven't had any in years and just reading your comment made my mouth water. 😋 😆
I grew up going to school with Matthew from elementary all the way thru high school. Lived around the corner from him. Had his mother as a teacher. Even was members at the same country club. Thought it was great when he made it in Hollywood but now I couldn’t care less about him and Hollywood.
@@shawnmeyer2788you do care or why would you type is long ass message to show your association with the actor. Common don’t lie to yourself
Thank you Mathew for shutting down the witch!!!
She decided to to pursue the question, no doubt because he is a Big Star and they want him back on the programs some day, and because her producer told her through her earphone to back off because he is a Big Star etc.
McConaughey is genuine. He's no Hollywood woke!!
He shut NO ONE "down" . He side-stepped the question and she CAPITULATED because they BOTH realized it would expose his TRUE AGENDA right there on "NATIONAL" TV .
He shut NO ONE "down" . He side-stepped the question and she CAPITULATED because they BOTH realized it would expose his TRUE AGENDA right there on "NATIONAL" TV .
@@LeeZaslofsky - He shut NO ONE "down" . He side-stepped the question and she CAPITULATED because they BOTH realized it would expose his TRUE AGENDA right there on "NATIONAL" TV .
What the hell is he talking about when he says we need background checks we already have full and complete background checks for every gun purchased legally in America wtf! 🤷
What does any of this do to actually stop crime?
"Stop crime"? You can't "stop crime", but you can reduce it and make it less dangerous.
American already has more of its people in its prisons than the next ten highest prison population countries COMBINED. Yes it has more crime than many of those countries.
Nothing . Its not _ABOUT_ "STOPPING" crime . Its _about_ stopping YOU from stopping *THEM* .
He is Hollywood not texas
100% BULLSHIT.
Absolutely! He is Austin Texas at best not the rest of Texas.
And Austin is so full of liberals and Californians. Move outta Texas. thank you
Exactly
USA is all Hollywood…if you haven’t noticed
Courthouses, Banks, Grocery stores, Malls, some recreational centers, building with News Corporate Headquarters, the list is long!
They ALL have Armed Guards.
Why don't our SCHOOLS?
That is the question that everyone should be aa
That is the question that everyone should be asking!
We need responsible brain ownership, but I don't see that happening anytime soon.
AMEN!
Responsible gun ownership is not anti guns. All legal gun owner’s want that.
What he wants goes far past responsible gun ownership.
@@user-pe3ld2is2o You can own guns, and still abide by laws. Until you can’t, but, then we have that right.
@@joycegamble8277 You say that people can own guns... until they don't abide by laws, then it is right for society to restrict them. I agree with that sentiment 100%.
Matthew however, proposes restricting people - who have broken ZERO laws and did NOTHING to harm others. EVERY thing he proposes - is an infringement upon gun owners BEFORE anyone has done anything wrong. And (and this is the part you need to really understand) - everything he proposes is unconstitutional and will raise crime rates.
1 - "We need background checks" - he's talking about UNIVERSAL background checks.
2 - "raise minimum age to purchase an AR-15 to 21"
3 - "waiting period for 'those rifles'"
4 - "Red Flag Laws"
Matt is too liberal he is a bit old hippie whack.
But not all laws are just. Re: history.
I like when they call her Joyless Behar 😂
She's a nice person. No need to hate her for asking a perfectly ordinary question of a potential candidate for office.
Oh she's not that bad. Do you have to dump on everyone you disagree with?
@@LeeZaslofsky Dump on her? That’s what other tv hosts call her - not me. I do find it funny though. I can’t take credit for that. I do respect an opposing point of view and we can always agree to disagree. That’s healthy and awakens thoughts and ideas for both sides. That seems to have been lost today. What I’m not happy about with her is she makes things up and attempts to ruin reputations of others and acts like her own cheerleader. People with powerful platforms need to be more responsible and civil in my opinion.
Joyless Bah hahaha ha😂
@@LeeZaslofsky Lee she is a nasty person with a big hateful mouth. Are you deaf, dumb and blind? Get a life!
a school district superintendent too busy because they are driving a school bus? or the PE teacher? no f-ing way unbelievable
He is tying to explain why no one is interested in his program. He should just be honest and say his idea had been a FLOP.
More lies to a wanting audience .
No he was explaining why the forms weren't filled out applying for the money to take up his project. He's right, they are to busy to do paperwork
Matthew McConaughey reminds me of Gavin newsom. I don't think he should be in charge of a lemonade stand.
Anyone not respecting the constitution should stay out of politics…so the answer is no he would never win an HONEST election in Texas. But after 2020 who believes we have fair elections…right
Not being able to admit that Trump lost is PATHETIC.
If people who don't respect the Constitution should stay out of politics why are there so many people backing Trump after he incited a riot back in 2020 because poor pitiful him didn't win and he's such a poor loser he got all his friends to march on the capital. Open your eyes!
@@DABA2024🤨 really. You still believe lies.
@@DABA2024 Anyone thinking he did lose is way more pathetic and down right DUMB!
Anyone who denies evidence right in front of them is pathetic...
Even a blind man can see that our election was tampered with.
They just better not try it again because it will not to down as nicely as it did last time.
Nice one, Mr. McConaughey didn't fall into her little trap, he clearly exposed that Behar isn't intelligent enough to try and play those sort of games.
He said he might run for office in Texas. She asked him what about his opinions on guns, which are not the standard Republican right wing view in Texas. He barked at her, failed to answer. She backed down for some reason.
Are we all supposed to pretend that guns are not a contentious issue in the State of Uvalde and El Paso? Or is it still too early to comment on those events because, as the super sensitive Gov. Abbott says "People are hurting"?
"Trap"? She asked a perfectly reasonable question: you just said you might run for office in your state of Texas. But your views on guns are not the common ones held by most Texans. How do you propose to deal with that?"
At that point her producer, speaking through her earphone, told her to back off, she was annoying the Big Handsome Movie Star. She did so, rather clumsily, giving him a chance to show how tough he can be with the evil Joy.
@@LeeZaslofsky No she tried to pinpoint him, but it doesn't really argue well for her that she has d no comeback and just accepted being put in her place, does it?
LeeZaslofsky. JUST SHUT THE HELL UP U. R. JUST ANOTHER LEFTY LOONIE & WE ALL CAN SEE RIGHT THROUGH YOUR. B.S. RANT 🤮
He shut NO ONE "down" . He side-stepped the question and she CAPITULATED because they BOTH realized it would expose his TRUE AGENDA right there on "NATIONAL" TV .
1 - "We need background checks" - he's talking about UNIVERSAL background checks.
2 - "raise minimum age to purchase an AR-15 to 21"
3 - "waiting period for 'those rifles'"
4 - "Red Flag Laws"
WHAT parts of these things that he says WE NEED - can anybody say is not 100% in line with being anti-Second Amendment?
He is FAR LEFT when it comes to guns and the 2nd Amendment - how do people not see this?
You have misinterpreted the Second Amendment. It calls for a "well regulated militia" to be established in each state, and calls upon white men to join, supplying their own weapons, as the federal government could not afford to provide it.
Those militias were established, but were found t be of poor quality in the war of 1812, and unreliable in the Mexican War. Of course the Civil War was fought by standing army forces, not militias, commanded by officers appointed by the central governments of the two sides.
The militias were not really useful, and in the early 20th century they were replaced by the National Guard, with weapons provided by the federal government, and subject to being federalized by the President and used as regular forces in war.
The gun nuts want to pretend that none of this happened, and that WWI and WWII were actually fought by state militias of self armed white men, commanded by their state governors while Presidents Wilson and Roosevelt dealt with other matters.
Of course, if this version of history were true, the Lincoln Memorial would have, by now, been redesigned and converted into the Adolf Hitler Denkmahl, with quotations from his speeches denouncing Jews, Communists, Socialists, Democracy, human rights and other evils inscribed on the walls where Lincoln's words had been.
And this would suit all too many gun nuts just fine.
@@LeeZaslofsky But the 2A has never been repealed - so we still have it in force.
@@TeranRealtorIt is outdated and irrelevant to modern life. The fact that it has been distorted and prostituted to the gun industry makes it necessary to repeal it and pass sensible gun laws.
This 18th century relic has become an obstacle to safety and security in America.
@@LeeZaslofsky the first thing any dictatorship and tyrannical government do is to remove weapons from citizens. Very funny that the US states with the harshest gun control laws are the ones with the most gun violence. Ironic isn’t it?
Im my town, if you call the police, ambulance or any other service besides the volunteer fire dept....30 minute response time. If your hurt bad enough, the fire dept will haul you to the field beside the post office and call care flight cuz thats the designated landing area for care flight. Other than that, you better have a buddy that can drive you to a hospital, or a gun to protect yourself. Its all gonna be said and done before any help arrives.
That's almost EVERYWHERE . "HELP" is _always_ *MINUTES* away when SECONDS COUNT , and is only there to clean up the mess and sweep up the glass *_LATER_* .
As a born and bred Texan, I can agree with him on most of his list, except red flag laws ... it's too easy for those to be abused
Then you do not understand what those things mean.
ZERO things on his list are constitutional. He is Beto in disguise.
There are plenty of gun laws already.
@@silent1967 yep, and criminals ignore them ... I didn't say I LIKE new laws, only that most of what he said was not 'a hill I'd die on' (except red flag - those I'd fight)
Don't we already have most everything that he said that we needed ?
@@markmixon1121 I think we do ... 2A absolutists could want them overturned, but I think most of what we have in place would be 'common sense' laws (at least, MY definition of common sense, others could disagree)
The issue is not thre gun. It is the prescription drugs that these people have free access too
The issue with your comment is that it is a clumsy attempt to change the subject. Lots of countries have problems with drugs. Most do not have gun problems as bad as the US.
@LeeZaslofsky Very few countries have the same issues with drugs as the US does. Infact total drug deaths worldwide are less than the 110 thousand Fentanyl deaths last year. And that does not even count prescription drug deaths
@@IanReasonAre we allowed to ask WHY the US, the richest, most powerful freest, (etc) country ever to grace God's Footstool is plagued with such a dire craving for deadly drugs?
Are we allowed to look into the social agony that prompts people to seek relief in suicidal drug taking?
Are we allowed to ask WHY other countries like Uruguay, Portugal and Canada has legalized some drugs and found that this REDUCES drug consumption?
Are we allowed to ask why the US, with its blind alley drug repression, actually supports the prices of drugs by creating a shortage or a much desired product?
Are we allowed to ask what is it in American society and culture that might explain the self destructive, suicidal lust for drugs that has destroyed so many American lives, while creating a class of enormously rich and powerful "kingpins" and heir employees that has accumulated enormous wealth that it "hides" in the Cayman Islands and other hidey holes?
Are we allowed to ask whether the drug crisis is simply the capitalist system acting according to its normal rules, sucking the blood of the poor and the sick and the desperate in order to enrich a tiny elite of criminals?
Are we allowed to ask whether the American people are really benefiting by the massive accumulation of wealth , "legal" and "illegal", in the hands of a tiny minority of ruthless sharks who gorge themselves while the children of the poor cry out for the food and help they desperately need?
Do we need to ask why Elon Muck, Jeff Bozos and other clowns and gangsters are treated like divine beings while they ransack the country and impoverish so many of its people?
Are we allowed to ask how it has come to the point where a convicted rapist, fraudster and tax cheat has become the darling and Leader of the very same people who suffer from the catastrophe of fentanyl and other curses of the American working class?
Has unbridled, criminal, corrupt capitalism destroyed the American effort to have 'government of the People, by the People, and fr the People", and replaced it with "Jesus wants you to be rich" and"Trump alone can fix it"?
Is there no alternative to this sleazy end to the great American Republic, all of whose whose people were described in the Emancipation Proclamation as "NOW, HENCEFORTH, AND FOREVER FREE"?
Was Lincoln full of shit? Was FDR a shyster with no legs? Was MartinLluther King Jr a Commie N===r who got what was coming to him? Is Donald Trump the true face of America in the 21st century, a whining, self pitying crook and rapist, a pussy grabbing con man whose motto is "You don't like it? So sue me! I'll strangle you in legal BS and delay the case past the End Times, and get a "continuance" in Hell!"
These questions never seem to get raised in the Land of Free Speech. Or they are suppressed as being too "extreme" and "politically incorrect".Or they are "unAmerican" because they question Money and Power, which are Sacred Cows in the Land of the Free these days, not to be mentioned, let alone questioned.
So we hear the usual complaints about "foreigners sending drugs to poison us", and "if we could only shrink wrap the border, we would have no problems with drugs, or crime, or hunger or pandemics, BECAUSE ALL OUR PROBLEMS COME FROM OUTSIDE OUR BORDERS and we don't create any of them ourselves.
Such lovely people we are, to be so afflicted by the evils of the outside world! Evils we have NOTHING to do with at all!
@@LeeZaslofsky - But those are countries who have self-disarmed and have thus transferred the violence to other means , not having eliminated it , only eliminating the victim's ability to defend themselves AGAINST the violence AND against the Government profiting off that violence - "Elect ME to make things BETTER !!! ( while we _continue_ to take away your FREEDOMS ..." .
There's NO denying that THIS is _both_ the intent AND the AGENDA .
No Red Flag laws… Period.
The money isn't there it's being divided and distributed amongst the politicians.
Given to illegal kids
The program he' so proud of is not working. It's nice to see him blame other people for that. It shows what kind of politician he would be.
We have all those regulations already
I agree, criminals don't abide laws!
What he's talking about still goes against the 2nd amendment. It's a slippery slope from what he's talking about to adding even more restrictions. Can't do it.
Can't have a gun till 21 ? Then no one has to go fight for the US till they're 21 then.
Not a gun he specifically referencing a certain type of gun basically A.R. 15s AK-47’s M-16’s assault rifles not pistols not shotguns not hunting rifles not black powder rifles fully automatic weapons is what it sounds like to me
@@boneless_Jungle_Ham Doesn't matter, give them an inch and they take a mile. Just look at Canada, read this: Semi auto ban in Canada is now official. I’m Canadian, the handgun ban was at the 11th hour stage were amendments were recommended. The current government put in a full ban on semi auto fire arms regardless of rimfire or centre fire. Named variants include the Sks. This was done via definition change. In the last 3 years we have lost black cool rifles, handguns and now semi autos. There are already stirrings of banning bolt actions and long range rifles next.
Edit: Rimfire is included, anything semi auto, with a detachable magazine. Please read section g4 in the amendments
@@boneless_Jungle_Ham Give them an inch and they take a mile, read this: Semi auto ban in Canada is now official. I’m Canada the handgun ban was at the 11th hour stage were amendments were recommended. The current government put in a full ban on semi auto fire arms regardless of rimfire or centre fire. Named variants include the Sks. This was done via definition change. In the last 3 years we have lost black cool rifles, handguns and now semi autos. There are already stirrings of banning bolt actions and long range rifles next.
Edit: Rimfire is included, anything semi auto, with a detachable magazine. Please read section g4 in the amendments
@@boneless_Jungle_HamNONE of those are " fully automatic"
@@boneless_Jungle_Hamalso you CANNOT own a m16 without a class 3 weapons license...
Sounds anti gun.
Coming from an Actor who has blown away plenty of people Onscreen.
Isn't it time to disband The View?
The more complicated the law, the more opportunities for scoundrels.
He may have shut down joy, but the simple fact of the matter is, Matthew has chosen Our 2nd Amendment as something that, needs his special expertise, and insight into a matter settled long b4 he was born. Too many more important issues Americans face today.. please.
Nothing has been settled about the 2nd Amendment. it is a major bone of contention in America. It needs to be repealed right away, and sensible gun laws passed.
So, if someone is legally able to buy a gun, then use it in a crime . How does any new law solve that.
And how would new laws prevent people who are legally denied guns, get guns and use guns illegally?
Why would you want to do that. You be better off getting one illegally so they have a harder time catching you.
Other countries have managed to solve it much more effectively than the US. How about learning from them?
@LeeZaslofsky yea, they just murder with other weapons, and then they outlaw those.
@@davidfreeman2522No they don't. Guns are a far more effective and easy to use weapon than a hammer, a knife or a baseball bat. If you reduce the number of guns, and cut way back on assault weapons, you cut the number of murders.
You re repeating a piece of BS put out by the likes of Wayne LaPierre, the Genius of the NRA, now under indictment.
18 year olds in the military can wield a fully automatic AR, or Armalite Rifle, but they need to be 21 to get a semi-auto rifle? Ah, not a person I would vote for.
Just more idiotic liberal logic……
State and government are very different 😂😂😂😂😂
I didn't think they used ARs in the military. I thought they used something else. 🤔 🤷🏼♀️
@@inthelandofmorethansmall7582 Google is your friend. Look it up.
AR's are semi automatic not automatic and never have been.Please educate yourself!
Hell yea!!! Alright Alright Alright! Glad someone smart doesn't lie to us like most Politicians!!!!
Saying that his program failed to get off the ground because school administrators were too busy driving school buses etc is a lie. Maybe the administrators have more important things to do than to fill out his fifty page application for WHAT?
And maybe the administrators would rather call for more gun controls than pretend that "making schools safer" is the solution to anything.
And then we all know waiting periods only hurts the defenseless.
They have had absolutely zero positive impact on crime or deaths.
As far as Red Flag Laws, only an idiot would think that's a good idea.
And we already have universal background checks.
So again, he didn't actually lie. I'm sure he does want those things. But why? I guarantee if he said WHY he wanted them, he would have to lie. Because there's no evidence to support and lots of evidence to proce they're stupid.
No , _this_ one does it with a "Texas" accent .
I strongly disagree with red flag laws...especially with this government
Nope. Wrong on guns.
He is anti-2A. If you are 18, you are an adult, Period. No waiting period, period! I thought a right delayed is a right denied?
He politically assassinated himself on the gun issue. No chance in Texas.
These regulations are a step backwards... so, respectfully disagree Matthew.
While he makes sense in what he says i am just baffled what makes actors and singers think they’re entitled to talk politics. And give opinions
Amen...
I love Matt as an actor, he does a wonderful job. Having said that, he really needs to rethink his opinion on “red flag laws.” They can be too easily abused. Due process is immeasurably important.
... mas _IS_ the RIGHT to *FACE YOUR ACCUSER* .
Clearly you do not understand the law.
I agree with him on one thing why aren't our schools better protected. Schools can be hardened without looking like prisons especially with today's technology.
He ain't no Texan
No red flag laws!!!!!!
No we need parents to be accountable for children that keep break laws. 🙏🇺🇸
Love Matthew, the Actor, and most of his real world perspectives/acts.
Absolutely detest Matthew the political propagandist and his efforts to erode/erase our 2A.
Anyone throwing the BS 'The View' shovels right back AT them? *OUTSTANDING!*
it would help your readers if you would make sure you're sober BEFORE writing down a bunch of incoherent drivel.
@@LeeZaslofsky
Yer cute when you try talkin' saucy to your Betters!
*Head pats*
thx for playin'!
@@AniwayasSongWhat is this, some kind of dialect comedy routine? "Talkin' saucy" my ass.
@@LeeZaslofsky
If you're having a problem with your ass, I suggest you consult with your primary care doctor.
Since I'm not a homesick tapeworm, I'm not interested.
@@AniwayasSongThe only problem with my ass is people like you clamoring to suck it. Please folks, let me have some peace!
One thing no state needs is red flag laws! He may act like he is not anti-gun but he sure isn't pro 2A.
Murder is already illegal, 2A says what it says if you don’t like it, tough, that’s the end of the discussion.
OVER 10,000 men, women, brothers, sisters, mothers, and fathers die every year from Drunk Driving. We tried prohibition once, how did the work out. It is not the guns or the alcohol that is killing others, it is a the people.
His "wish list" of "practical laws" is absolutely wrong, and wrong-headed.
He is such a class act. He shut “her” down with one sentence.
He will say exactly what his audience wants to hear.
I taught school in very violent communities in Detroit. No shootings there, the police put substations in high profile schools just for shift changes. It takes a load off of the main police station. They’re not really there for the school but they can be, and there’s always squad cars in the parking lot.
Great idea
The cringe starts when I hear the phrase "responsible' gun owner, 'lawful' gun owner, 'legal' gunowner". It means the rights of the gun owner are already infringed upon. Putting qualifier words in phrases defines the discussion. We need to understand the definitions of these words and what they mean. Listen to any politician speak and you'll hear qualifiers in every sentence so they can't be accused of lying.
So at 18 you can use an AR in battle but you need to be 21 to purchase one?!? That makes sense!
That's a cop out. When you go in the military You learn how to handle a gun..on the street whole different ball game. Don't compare them. They are not the same.
No country uses AR's in war.
Only American with balls.
You don't know me, do you Sparky?
I'm not sure where you live but this man did say he would take my ar from me if he became governor
Oh please. What "balls" has he shown?
Matt gets a thumbs up just for shutting her down like him or not he refused to lower himself DOWN to her level.
99% of Matt haters only saw Dallas Buyers Club, and it is a great movie BUT he made Mudd as well. Texan or not it does not matter
You said he isn't anti-gun which is bs. He most certainly is and his response on The Puke was a pure politicians response. He is a major enemy of the 2nd Amendment so don't be fooled by his forked tongue.
^Well Spoken.
A vote for him is just another wasted vote
He doesn't even know we already have them
We are a over regulated society.
You need a permit for almost everthing you want to do on your own property.
There are so many laws for what we can't do its crazy.
Positions live to make new laws ( makes them feel usefull) enforcement of the proper common sense laws is what is needed.
Name 5 regulations that are active today and you feel went too far.
Remember , Actors Act, nothing else
Nope. Screw Matthew
His Movies Suck @ss.
Elevating popular actors to speak at the White House cheapens our government, even if it’s what I consider traitor “booty licious” McConaughey.
Actors are Americans too. And many of them do not come cheap. But maybe you're the Last Surviving Puritan, opposed to theater, movies etc because actors playing a role are pretending to be someone they are not, and thus are lying publicly.
So service men fight with handguns
Shall not be infringed????
We don't need anything , criminals are outside law , so please explain how more laws will work?
I think that you have to sprinkle some magic dust or something.
@stephenbrecht1696 explain ??? No idea what you mean
I can't believe that he would even stoop so low as to even be on this horrible show!!
Matthew handled Joy's question perfectly, he shut her down with strength without allowing her to bait him into an argument. Matthew is not antigun, he supports the 2nd Amendment, but is for responsible gun owners.
lol it’s like he’s never ever looked into buying a gun , there is background checks there is a waiting period. But he’s pro gun ???? lol I don’t think so he just spewed liberal talking points and didn’t choose his words wisely.
Not if you go to a great big gun show and buy your guns. If you want to get a gun in America, it's as easy as pie. People do it every day without all the folderol about waiting periods etc.
@@LeeZaslofsky sorry even gun shows the same rules apply , you’ve clearly never bought a gun b4 from anywhere. Like where do you guys come up with this BS out right lie for people you don’t even know I’m starting to think it’s a mental illness.
@@LeeZaslofsky you watch too much TV but hey you can prove what you say go to a gun show and show that they’ll sell you a gun and walk out with it the same day and post it the entire interaction but we all know you won’t cause you can’t.
@@shelby3347 I have no interest at all in setting foot in a gun show or any other such event.
Guns are bought every day and transported across state lines. The famous route from Easy Going on Guns Virginia to Tough on Guns New York is well known.
There is NO problem getting a gun in the US is you want one and can pay the price. The US is a patchwork quilt of strict laws here, lenient laws a few blocks away
@@LeeZaslofsky lmfao 🤣🤣🤣🤣 so I noticed how you decided to change your language around what you originally said now it’s clear to anyone reading this you have zero idea what your talking about again you watch to much liberal tv cause now your talking about the ILLEGAL gun trade and not LEGAL gun buying you just exposed yourself and my original comment stands. Maybe you should go educate yourself instead of letting other people tell you how to think like a sheep. 🐏 if you don’t understand what I’m saying let’s try this bah bah bah , bah bah. Was that easier for you to understand 🐑
Allow Teachers to carry that will make schools way safer. keep Hollyweird out of politics it's already bad enough as it is!
He’s not anti gun. He’s anti 2A.
There not talking about all the guns being smuggled into our country every day. What about that. Why wasn’t that discussed.
I’ve NEVER heard of a school district superintendent too busy because they are also driving bus and teaching PE. That statement alone shows how Hollywood has NO IDEA what typical America is like.
McConaughey lives in Texas. He was trying to explain why no one seems interested in his "safer schools" program. He would have been better off simply to admit it is a flop and move on.
@@LeeZaslofsky - EXACTLY . No one in _or _*_out_* of Texas believes that tripe of an "explanation" .
What he saying is that these college educated administers are not smart enough to fill out the forms to get funding for the safety of our children. Maybe if they if they spend more time teaching facts and giving the kids the tools to excel we be a lot better. Safe and responsible ownership of a firearm is not the cause of crime. Dad AND mom insisted that I could not go around shooting and punching people. Since we hear about it nightly on the news I suggest it might be a lack of parenting. I like liver and onions, you don't have to it OK.
You sound like you have a larger point to make: shut down the colleges and teach "facts" and "give the kids the tools to excel".
BTW who cares what your Dad and Mom insisted? Why do you people always want to talk about what your parents told you? Are you aware that many kids don''t listen to what their parents tell them?
Your anger about something or other has turned you into a babbling fool. Maybe instead of mouthing off about nothing, you should go to college and learn how to think clearly.
-Background checks already exist.
-Red flag laws are unconstitutional
-Being able to die for one's country and not being able to purchase the firearms for personal protection at the same age is idiotic. I can make the same argument for drinking.
-Nothing that Matthew proposed will ever apply to criminals...so what does that do for anyone?
Way to go Mathew for not falling for her crap ..
I am a conservative gun nut and I can get behind some of his ideas. If nothing else, an honest dialogue would be good for a change.
Here's some honest dialogue: the Second Amendment has become a huge obstacle to public safety in America. It needs to be repealed so that sensible gun controls can be legislated.
Can't stand him. Or her. But especially him.
He's made so many Movies where he Picked Up a Gun and Blew Someone Away.
What a Hypocrite.
I'm really glad they're wearing those little pins. Really made a difference
What a hypocrite Matthew is, he has made millions off of gun violence, making it cool to kill. NOW he want to do something. He can do anything he wants but keep his bloody hands off our guns. We didn't romanticize them. He did.
Actors need to stay completely out of it about guns. Ask Alec Baldwin.
@@glassontherocks Perfect.
Actors/actresses who are anti-gun should never appear in works that glorify guns!
@@stephenbrecht1696 I agree.
He just can't get it, shall not be infringed.
Screw him and Red Flag Laws !
The view should not even be a thing
Why is the View even still on the air????!!!!!
That's why Matthew is a great man!!! And I think he'd be a great governor for Texas! Honestly we need people like him all over the USA
He's anti gunner. He's all about infrindgement on America's ability to self defence.