Just imagine you are the Austrian emperor, your empire is crashing down by communists and nationalists, and the other powers are discussing the partition of your empire like you were nothing.
@-P3NGU1N Considering how his past "What if everything went perfect for ____" focused on Imperial Russia and Germany, it would make most sense for it to be pre-ww1 Italy.
1848-49: Limited Sardinia-Piedmont victory with Austria keeping its borders but losing its client states (Tuscany, Lucca, etc.) 1859: SP offer Savoy and Nice for French support against Austria and get Lombardy and Venetia, but not all of their demands. 1860s: France is rebuffed when they ask for Savoy and Nice. Italy argues that France did not fulfill Italian demands. International pressure mounts as France starts making threats. A referendum is carried out with British observers and Italy keeps everything. 1861: Italy is unified except Rome 1866: Italy joins the Austro-Prussian war and smh manages to win. S Tyrol, Istria, and Dalmatia are annexed. 1870-71: Italy joins the Franco-Prussian war, against France. France has to give up Corsica. By now Italy is strongly in the Central Powers camp, and will probably be on the winning side of a WW1.
Btw, in your Second World poll, I noticed a lot of problems: - You can't give Memel or Southern East Prussia to the independent Kaliningrad - You can give East Prussia to West Germany even if East Germany is independent - You can't give a Polish province to Lithuania, which would create really disgusting borders if Lithuania got everything around it - No North Epirus - No Turkic Union option - You can't give IRL Tajik lands to Tajikistan - Independent Komi would be an enclave no matter what you do - You can give some provinces to an independent Manchuria, but you can't make Manchuria independent - You also can't give Transamur to Manchuria - You can't give western Gansu to East Turkestan - No Fangchenggang ;( You should probably do a re-run of it (especially given the Manchuria issue)
In Addition - You can't give Bryansk to Ukraine - No Slovene independence question - No option to give Astrakhan to an independent Kalmykia. - You can't give independence to a Siberian state or a Yakut state - No option to give Sakhalin or the Kuril's to Japan - Can't give Inner Mongolia to Mongolia & Many more.
Depends on when the war starts. If it starts and Britain joins I guesss it would be relatively similar. If Britain doesnt join, then Germany wins without a doubt. Removing Britain basically removes nearly all of the bad things for germany (for example food shortages). On the other hand the entente is really weakened as Britain was not only supplying manpower but also paying for the war effort of the entente. Without Britain there is no submarine warfare and no american entry.
Drifting Britain away from the Franco-Russian pairing is already a huge boon for Germany, which, I think personally outweighs any negative impact of deleting Austria. Britain's blockade was ruinous.
It all depends on Britain. If the UK stays neutral, then Germany can most likely break the French lines within a year or two, which would then basically leave the war as a 1 v 1 between Germany and a stronger Russia, where the Germans would probably still win. If Britain still joins the Entente, then the Russians and Romanians overwhelm the Transylvanian principalities, marches through Hungary, and push the Germans hard on the Eastern Front. The French and British hold the line in the east, while Italy stays neutral. The Germans would be fighting an much more defensive war than in our timeline, and they'll most likely lose. The main difference in this second scenario is that Russia might not have a revolution, since the war would have gone better for them (they probably would've still been pushed backwards, but not as much as in our timeline).
Serbia and Greece will definitely partition what would have been Albania for themselves in the first one, it was Austria who enforced Albanian independence if I remember right. Serbia was already gonna see bigger gains no matter what our votes did to Austria. The Balkans were only one place where Italy sought to expand its borders and/or influence, really. I don't see why having Croatia aligned to them will shut Italy out of picking at the Ottoman rear end. And speaking of Serbia, their pan-Yugoslav movement is now directly obstructed by Italian-supported Croatia and German-controlled Slovenia. I think it's probable that their gains of South Slav territories bring the Germans and Italians into conflict with Serbia's big protector Russia and _their_ ally France.
I think it would also be in the interest of germany to strenghten Romania as an ally to open another possible russian front even if temporary in return for the rest of transylvania You also havent talked much about britains and french reactions to this chaos Another question would be how firmily is croatia under italian control (i dunno how the croatian people at the time saw the italians or if they would really be loyal to italy as a puppet. I am also assuming that this new italian royal family in croatia is very popular as being their first independent king in about 1000 years and that was why they were chosen as kings I would also like to know the reaction of the ottomans, since the habsburgs were one of the biggest oponents to their interests in the balkans (maybe a reconquest of serbia?)
I have a frankstien Scenario, Germany teams up with Hungary not because of the fact that they like each other (they don’t) But Becuase they both see Russia as a much greater threat to both of the nations existence.
A survey has just been completed via the link. I think it would be better to divide the regions even more and number them instead of different colors. (tr)
@Cannon530YTOO belgian revolution, I don't now much about it but it is basically belgian rebelion against dutch in 19th century, which was started by people, who went out of theater after patrioticall play
@FishwicksREAL nah, Alexander goes off and makes his greco-persian empire and you've got hyper-rome vs super-carthage waging the 17th punic war in the land and sea
@@ayathados6629 rome would be too weak to fight a carthage that continues to exist, never becomes an empire, and dies in the cradle. simply not possible.
@@FishwicksREAL Rome was pretty crazy, as long as they didn’t lose Sardinia or Sicily they would probably still become an empire. Taking over Illyria and Greece would probably be where they’d expand instead.
I pretty much had Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Serbia, and Russia all set up to be problems for the west, whose only actual gains were Czechia, Slovenia, and Croatia.
I feel like an althis scenario on "What if everything went perfect for Turkey (Ottoman Empire)?" where it starts from the failed 1683 Siege of Vienna and where the Turks might expand from would be interesting. I just feel like it would be an interesting scenario, seeing the Muslim Turks absolutely destroying the Christian Kingdoms of that time, it would probably be a similar video to what if everything went perfect for the Habsburgs video.
I have à quite complex idea for à next scenario. On the 12th-13th century, Europe know a intellectual revolution due to the translation of Ancient texts from arabic traductions (just for example the almost-entire aristotelian corpus, or a lot neoplatonicians works). So I imagine the uchrony: what if the arabs don't had the Ancients texts. If they don't want to translate first the greeks and syriacs ancients texts, for example only accept the coranic text as a accepted and legal texts), their politics will be radicaly différents. As same for Europe, wich stey in a evolved version of a still feudal mentality of the 11th century. If you want more informations I can bring you a good bibliography about this subject ! Btw it was a great vidéo, like always ! Greeting from Belgium
about the pole, it seems like you wanted to partitioned that one Russian Island right above Japan but never set a poll on what's gonna happen to it. (it had the light blue color, 2nd to last bunch of questions) if you do manage to fix it, know in advance i'm voting for Japan to get them
Here is a suggestion i propose that i find intriguing What if Franquist Spain managed to survive? What i mean by this is for the dictatorship system to have survived and for the successor to have been able to do something. maybe have the then president Carrero survive throughout all the chaos of the 70s. I genuinely don't know where it might lead
Personally, I see this as a good thing for Germany, while relations have soured with Russia compared to the past, they are far from truly terrible at this point in time at the loss of Austria could serve as a release valve on tensions. Additionally this Germany lacks the Balkan commitments Austria did with the sole potential exception of Croatia if they manage to expand upon relations with Italy again into a proper alliance to replace Austria. I also dont really see the UK intervening in any war in Europe even if say France or Germany invades Belgium as that was more an excuse to get into the war than a genuine desire to properly protect Belgium especially as it would feed into a nightmare scenario of essentially turning whatever side it joins into the dominant continental power when its much more to British interests to just let both sides weaken each other as much as possible.
Germany does hold Slovenia, this alongside Croatia being in Italy's sphere could create problems with Serbia later on. Croatia's new king may well be this timeline's Franz Ferdinand.
@@gengarzilla1685 Already mentioned Croatia as an exception and potential problem, and Slovenia is well, already pretty Germanized by the time of the WW1 era and I imagine another 30 years would help really cement that, especially with Slovene loyalty to the Habsburgs, especially as any Serb efforts to cause problems would be focused on Croatia, something Serbia would have a far, FAR harder time pulling a Ferdinand moment for due to the unique circumstances involved, especially as I see both Germany and Russia trying to contain any incident from escalating resulting in diplomatic action over war or a very limited largely proxy conflict of a war that is probably nothing more then a border skirmish. Especially as Italy might be more interested in eating Dalmatia for itself than protecting Croatia putting Serbia in a very difficult position for further expansion beyond a division of Croatia with Italy as both Italy and Germany are too strong to stand against alone, and the dream of a Greater Serbia is already achieved severely limiting the radicalism of Serbian expansionism, especially as Russia would have little interest in such things for quite some time as it deals with its never-ending internal issues.
I would see logical from germany to try and use his territory on Transilvania to purchase Romanian and Serbian allegiance. I can see germany even helping Greece too ecenomically, and even helping even further the balkans once the belgrade pack forms against thr Bulgarians once the ottomans go puf. Then they surely would go on to try to make italy and Brittan their mjaor allies
We know barely anything about the religion, It’s impossible for it to spread as it was a secret society and worshipped a greco-persian god. The Christians would simply start the civil war and take over.
A world too different for him to predict after 476? Like what do you want from such a scenario "oh, the empire still mostly collapses around the same way but Islam might be butterflied out and all the politics of Europe are different so who knows. Culturally Europe is a different world too"
It would end up being Europe but with Mithraism and no Christianity. Islam probably gets butterflied as a result but the majority of events are too difficult to predict with that single change.
@Cannon530YTOOin the description there’s a link to vote for what borders the Eastern block countries (Eastern Europe, Yugoslavia, Soviet Union, Korea and China) would have if communism would’ve collapsed at the end of the Cold War
I think the UK is more likely to stay neutral in WW1 because of this, or even join the Germans which would lead to the US never joining either. Another thing to consider is that Italy had by now basically taken all their claims on Austrian land, meaning they might switch sides to join the Germans. Also, since the war would not start in 1914, due to the fact that Franz Ferdinand would have little reason to be shot in Sarajevo, and just a few years' delay would have meant a drastically different WW1, this is an interesting scenario indeed.
Smaller detail, but Albania won't be independent now. It was Austria who enforced Albanian statehood in a move to limit Serbian gains in the First Balkan War. Without them, Serbia and Greece can partition modern-day Albania between each other.
Generally it treated if it was of the last 20-30 years it isn’t really history but politics, that’s why only recently people started to touch Afghanistan and war on terror because it is only now going from politics into history
Just imagine you are the Austrian emperor, your empire is crashing down by communists and nationalists, and the other powers are discussing the partition of your empire like you were nothing.
So basically what happened IRL?
Irony considering Austria's participation in Poland-Lithuania's partitions
Yeah, imagine that… *poland voice*
They basically _were_ nothing at this stage of the collapse.
@@beefyblomwell atleast irl the allies still help them to defend their territories from hungary and yugoslavia
It finally came out, it has been a century
hi kaiser my pookie bear
I really really like these viewer votes, especially when he makes follow-up videos on how this would effect the world long term
OH MY GOD HE PUSHED THE EVERY MODERN EMPIRE VIDEO EVEN FURTHER BACK
I thought I was the only one that wanted this video to come out lol
i thinks he's rewriting it trying to be as uncontroversial as possible
@@derevianne1108 controversy is exactly why I want it
@@alielsherif1566 hell fucking yeah
It’s never coming out
"By 1910, Europe was very, very 10s"
-Possible History
11:36 Btw, you forgot to give Switzerland Vorarlberg on the big map
What if everything went perfect for Italy?
Possible history, for the love of god please do this.
@-P3NGU1N Considering how his past "What if everything went perfect for ____" focused on Imperial Russia and Germany, it would make most sense for it to be pre-ww1 Italy.
@-P3NGU1NItaly going fascist implies irl “mutilated” victory or a ww1 defeat, which means everything was in fact not perfect for Italy
Getting Algeria, Tunesia, Egypt, Cathalonia, agean islands, Albania, most of the french alps and parts of Turkey.
1848-49: Limited Sardinia-Piedmont victory with Austria keeping its borders but losing its client states (Tuscany, Lucca, etc.)
1859: SP offer Savoy and Nice for French support against Austria and get Lombardy and Venetia, but not all of their demands.
1860s: France is rebuffed when they ask for Savoy and Nice. Italy argues that France did not fulfill Italian demands. International pressure mounts as France starts making threats. A referendum is carried out with British observers and Italy keeps everything.
1861: Italy is unified except Rome
1866: Italy joins the Austro-Prussian war and smh manages to win. S Tyrol, Istria, and Dalmatia are annexed.
1870-71: Italy joins the Franco-Prussian war, against France. France has to give up Corsica.
By now Italy is strongly in the Central Powers camp, and will probably be on the winning side of a WW1.
You don't wanna know, how long i've been eagerly waiting for this video! Love your content!
_"You and I remember Budapest very differently..."_
What
@@ReallyBadAtYT there is no movie called avengers assemble
It’s the avengers movie
Great video! I made sure to do the vote as well! :D
@Cannon530YTOO Big Kazakhstan.
The best visuals in a PH video yet, I love it
I'm loving the editing on this one!
Btw, in your Second World poll, I noticed a lot of problems:
- You can't give Memel or Southern East Prussia to the independent Kaliningrad
- You can give East Prussia to West Germany even if East Germany is independent
- You can't give a Polish province to Lithuania, which would create really disgusting borders if Lithuania got everything around it
- No North Epirus
- No Turkic Union option
- You can't give IRL Tajik lands to Tajikistan
- Independent Komi would be an enclave no matter what you do
- You can give some provinces to an independent Manchuria, but you can't make Manchuria independent
- You also can't give Transamur to Manchuria
- You can't give western Gansu to East Turkestan
- No Fangchenggang ;(
You should probably do a re-run of it (especially given the Manchuria issue)
In Addition
- You can't give Bryansk to Ukraine
- No Slovene independence question
- No option to give Astrakhan to an independent Kalmykia.
- You can't give independence to a Siberian state or a Yakut state
- No option to give Sakhalin or the Kuril's to Japan
- Can't give Inner Mongolia to Mongolia
& Many more.
that is just to make it more chaotic, which equals interestingness in the video’s
@@aydendejong451 more options = more fun
i am complaining about the lack of the options that could've been added
It has been over a month since he introduced the second world poll, so probably it has something to do with the problems.
And I hope you can do a follow-up video on what would happen next, similar to how viewers voted on WW1 and WW2 borders
i love bigHungary
He said it at the end of
As a German, I am looking forward to knowing if it would end good or bad for us
Depends on when the war starts. If it starts and Britain joins I guesss it would be relatively similar. If Britain doesnt join, then Germany wins without a doubt. Removing Britain basically removes nearly all of the bad things for germany (for example food shortages). On the other hand the entente is really weakened as Britain was not only supplying manpower but also paying for the war effort of the entente. Without Britain there is no submarine warfare and no american entry.
Drifting Britain away from the Franco-Russian pairing is already a huge boon for Germany, which, I think personally outweighs any negative impact of deleting Austria. Britain's blockade was ruinous.
It all depends on Britain. If the UK stays neutral, then Germany can most likely break the French lines within a year or two, which would then basically leave the war as a 1 v 1 between Germany and a stronger Russia, where the Germans would probably still win. If Britain still joins the Entente, then the Russians and Romanians overwhelm the Transylvanian principalities, marches through Hungary, and push the Germans hard on the Eastern Front. The French and British hold the line in the east, while Italy stays neutral. The Germans would be fighting an much more defensive war than in our timeline, and they'll most likely lose. The main difference in this second scenario is that Russia might not have a revolution, since the war would have gone better for them (they probably would've still been pushed backwards, but not as much as in our timeline).
In a perfect scenario, Germany would have Britain and Italy as allies. I think they have a chance of winning
@@ruihund Italy makes sense, a lot of territorial demands against France
But why Britain? Britain stopped fearing Russia after Russo-Japanese war
Transylvania aside, this was pretty much what I'd envisioned with my votes. Now let's see what goes down with the Balkan Wars and WW1 thereafter.
Stronger Serbia and Montenegro would affect Balkan wars
Though would Italy even invade Lybia having secured a lot of land a strong ally in Balkans?
Serbia and Greece will definitely partition what would have been Albania for themselves in the first one, it was Austria who enforced Albanian independence if I remember right. Serbia was already gonna see bigger gains no matter what our votes did to Austria.
The Balkans were only one place where Italy sought to expand its borders and/or influence, really. I don't see why having Croatia aligned to them will shut Italy out of picking at the Ottoman rear end.
And speaking of Serbia, their pan-Yugoslav movement is now directly obstructed by Italian-supported Croatia and German-controlled Slovenia. I think it's probable that their gains of South Slav territories bring the Germans and Italians into conflict with Serbia's big protector Russia and _their_ ally France.
Also socialism on the international stage. Certainly not as bad as the Bolsheviks, but still probably not great
YES PLS CONTINUEEEE and continue talking about the leaders and stuff, basically to give some more realism and depth
@Cannon530YTOO Yeah thats true but I guess that would be harder to predict and also make scenarios more complicated and hard for him to make
There are 27 children inside my attic
Same li'l bro
This ain't insta
Good
Wait what i took one there should be 26
rookie numbers
Finally!!!!!!! I was waiting for this video!!!!!
Super excited to see if my scenario wins out. Love the voter part of your videos
I think it would also be in the interest of germany to strenghten Romania as an ally to open another possible russian front even if temporary in return for the rest of transylvania
You also havent talked much about britains and french reactions to this chaos
Another question would be how firmily is croatia under italian control (i dunno how the croatian people at the time saw the italians or if they would really be loyal to italy as a puppet. I am also assuming that this new italian royal family in croatia is very popular as being their first independent king in about 1000 years and that was why they were chosen as kings
I would also like to know the reaction of the ottomans, since the habsburgs were one of the biggest oponents to their interests in the balkans (maybe a reconquest of serbia?)
I'm pretty certain the wider foreign reactions will be in the continuation video. This one was just meant to show territorial and influence changes.
You know it's a good day when possible history uploads!
"Tuesday, I will release a follow-up to this video"
*Is Tuesday*
No video
Sad ):
Jk, you do you man, you rock
I've been waiting for this video
This is honestly the best viewer vote, both results and video quality wise
I have a frankstien Scenario, Germany teams up with Hungary not because of the fact that they like each other (they don’t)
But Becuase they both see Russia as a much greater threat to both of the nations existence.
The two drunken men at that pub in Budapest: _What have we Done?_
A survey has just been completed via the link. I think it would be better to divide the regions even more and number them instead of different colors. (tr)
FINALLY YAY 😊 ❤, THANK YOU
This Video is amazing. People say his videos are cheap and unrealistic. But I this these are one of the most enjoying videos
Thursday I need part two
"And a group of drunken men ended up causing a rucus."
Mood.
Also very Belgian.
Belgians at least were at theatre, not in pub
@@Holy_Cup Aye, that does make it slightly more acceptable. But still.
@Cannon530YTOO belgian revolution, I don't now much about it but it is basically belgian rebelion against dutch in 19th century, which was started by people, who went out of theater after patrioticall play
This would have been ghe perfect outcome to prevent ww1 and ww2
I know this seems like a weird topic but what about…
What if everything went well for Carthage, Rome and Alexander the Great concurrantly
literally impossible
@FishwicksREAL nah, Alexander goes off and makes his greco-persian empire and you've got hyper-rome vs super-carthage waging the 17th punic war in the land and sea
@@ayathados6629 based
@@ayathados6629 rome would be too weak to fight a carthage that continues to exist, never becomes an empire, and dies in the cradle. simply not possible.
@@FishwicksREAL Rome was pretty crazy, as long as they didn’t lose Sardinia or Sicily they would probably still become an empire. Taking over Illyria and Greece would probably be where they’d expand instead.
Great video man love you Stuff.
Its Tuesday where part 2!!!!!
I just did the new poll, prioritized chaos and stupid enclaves and a large, ultra nationalist east Germany with as few allies as possible.
I pretty much had Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Serbia, and Russia all set up to be problems for the west, whose only actual gains were Czechia, Slovenia, and Croatia.
Really cool concept and I loved voting
0:52 it always does
@Tovalokodonc i am talking about PH’s videos. In his videos, Hungarians always start a revolt in Budapest and then the empire collapses.
Video 6 of asking Possible History for a video about "If Valery Sablin was succesful"
The new map (and editing) look so much better!
Finally the Austria thing is out. I’m so happy right now
You always make my days better thank you
I feel like an althis scenario on "What if everything went perfect for Turkey (Ottoman Empire)?" where it starts from the failed 1683 Siege of Vienna and where the Turks might expand from would be interesting. I just feel like it would be an interesting scenario, seeing the Muslim Turks absolutely destroying the Christian Kingdoms of that time, it would probably be a similar video to what if everything went perfect for the Habsburgs video.
10:15 Enclave Liechtenstein, Enclave Liechtenstein
Thank god. I remember voting on this one. So excited :)
Please do a what if Bavaria unified Germany and a what if Charlemagne married irene of byzantium
Fuck yeah! Big Switzerland!
i love it when the funny dutch guy lets his psychopathic viewers ruin major powers
I really like this style for viewer decide series
Idea:
What if hilter never became the president of Germany
Voted for communist Hungary. Let’s see if it happens.
Edit: I am all seeing
So true
@@Voided191 why must you cyber stalk me on all platforms
@@brandongilbertson3552 I wasn't even stalking, stop having the same taste in UA-camrs as me damnit!
oh no. Hungry hungary....
LOVE YOUR CONTENT ❤❤❤❤❤
I love the new map animations! They look insanely cool!
What if VIEWERS Voted On Sweden’s Collapse in 1910?
(Please do a what if everything went perfect for Norway scenario)
And how would sweden collapse?
Sweden's collapse is currently happening in modern day, but there's no way the Swedes would collapse in 1910.
@@FishwicksREAL how
@@notlucas6859 muslims.
@@FishwicksREAL goober
I have à quite complex idea for à next scenario.
On the 12th-13th century, Europe know a intellectual revolution due to the translation of Ancient texts from arabic traductions (just for example the almost-entire aristotelian corpus, or a lot neoplatonicians works).
So I imagine the uchrony: what if the arabs don't had the Ancients texts.
If they don't want to translate first the greeks and syriacs ancients texts, for example only accept the coranic text as a accepted and legal texts), their politics will be radicaly différents.
As same for Europe, wich stey in a evolved version of a still feudal mentality of the 11th century.
If you want more informations I can bring you a good bibliography about this subject !
Btw it was a great vidéo, like always !
Greeting from Belgium
about the pole, it seems like you wanted to partitioned that one Russian Island right above Japan but never set a poll on what's gonna happen to it. (it had the light blue color, 2nd to last bunch of questions)
if you do manage to fix it, know in advance i'm voting for Japan to get them
Mom, wake up! Possible History just uploaded!
Very very good video 👍
When the next? I already voted and I'm waiting for the video
You should do a scenario about what if the Kalmar union survived, I think it could lead to a very interesting video, just a suggestion though.
What happened to "Tuesday"? It's Wednesday.
Edit 1: Now Thursday. . . Still waiting.
Here is a suggestion i propose that i find intriguing
What if Franquist Spain managed to survive? What i mean by this is for the dictatorship system to have survived and for the successor to have been able to do something. maybe have the then president Carrero survive throughout all the chaos of the 70s. I genuinely don't know where it might lead
I waited for this sooo long
you should do another UA-camr conference frfr
much cleaner than I would have hoped for.
The duality of man.
I love these viewer voted episodes
Personally, I see this as a good thing for Germany, while relations have soured with Russia compared to the past, they are far from truly terrible at this point in time at the loss of Austria could serve as a release valve on tensions. Additionally this Germany lacks the Balkan commitments Austria did with the sole potential exception of Croatia if they manage to expand upon relations with Italy again into a proper alliance to replace Austria. I also dont really see the UK intervening in any war in Europe even if say France or Germany invades Belgium as that was more an excuse to get into the war than a genuine desire to properly protect Belgium especially as it would feed into a nightmare scenario of essentially turning whatever side it joins into the dominant continental power when its much more to British interests to just let both sides weaken each other as much as possible.
Germany does hold Slovenia, this alongside Croatia being in Italy's sphere could create problems with Serbia later on. Croatia's new king may well be this timeline's Franz Ferdinand.
@@gengarzilla1685 Already mentioned Croatia as an exception and potential problem, and Slovenia is well, already pretty Germanized by the time of the WW1 era and I imagine another 30 years would help really cement that, especially with Slovene loyalty to the Habsburgs, especially as any Serb efforts to cause problems would be focused on Croatia, something Serbia would have a far, FAR harder time pulling a Ferdinand moment for due to the unique circumstances involved, especially as I see both Germany and Russia trying to contain any incident from escalating resulting in diplomatic action over war or a very limited largely proxy conflict of a war that is probably nothing more then a border skirmish.
Especially as Italy might be more interested in eating Dalmatia for itself than protecting Croatia putting Serbia in a very difficult position for further expansion beyond a division of Croatia with Italy as both Italy and Germany are too strong to stand against alone, and the dream of a Greater Serbia is already achieved severely limiting the radicalism of Serbian expansionism, especially as Russia would have little interest in such things for quite some time as it deals with its never-ending internal issues.
Been waiting for this to drop for a while now and finally after 7 world wars, it's here!
Lore of What if VIEWERS Voted On Austria's Collapse in 1910? Momentum 100
love your videos
I would see logical from germany to try and use his territory on Transilvania to purchase Romanian and Serbian allegiance.
I can see germany even helping Greece too ecenomically, and even helping even further the balkans once the belgrade pack forms against thr Bulgarians once the ottomans go puf.
Then they surely would go on to try to make italy and Brittan their mjaor allies
What if Rome and all of Europe converted to Mithraism?
Yesss
We know barely anything about the religion, It’s impossible for it to spread as it was a secret society and worshipped a greco-persian god. The Christians would simply start the civil war and take over.
A world too different for him to predict after 476? Like what do you want from such a scenario "oh, the empire still mostly collapses around the same way but Islam might be butterflied out and all the politics of Europe are different so who knows. Culturally Europe is a different world too"
It would end up being Europe but with Mithraism and no Christianity. Islam probably gets butterflied as a result but the majority of events are too difficult to predict with that single change.
when are you releasing the map for the new poll
I really want him to do a kind of viewers votes where like a second civil war happens
The poll for next one is so long I forgot my own lore I was trying to vote for.
I can’t wait for “My viewers decided the collapse of the Roman Empire”
Hello again possible history
this scenario seems pretty cool actually
Might I make a suggestion for a video idea?
It's another viewer voted type of video, but it's for the Russo-Japanese War.
Does anyone know what the piano songs after 5:18 are named?
noooooo how did I not know there was a vote
@Cannon530YTOO Ye
@Cannon530YTOO I forgot
flexing the new editor are we?
Why is Voralberg not part of Switzerland at the end?
What if everything went perfectly for Bavaria?
It'd be interesting if you gave treaty votes for post-war worlds in alt history scenarios
4:23 hey every modern empire isn’t even there anymore. It’s never coming then I guess
Filled in the viewer vote 😉
@Cannon530YTOOin the description there’s a link to vote for what borders the Eastern block countries (Eastern Europe, Yugoslavia, Soviet Union, Korea and China) would have if communism would’ve collapsed at the end of the Cold War
what if Caesar from planet of the apes existed irl and waged a war against the CIA
Intriguing. 🤔 it almost looks deceptively stable. For 1910.
Bro went heavy on the special effects this time
School got canceled today so I got to watch this rn
Supprised you don’t have online class
Voting for this was fun
The edit was so incredibly good
I think the UK is more likely to stay neutral in WW1 because of this, or even join the Germans which would lead to the US never joining either. Another thing to consider is that Italy had by now basically taken all their claims on Austrian land, meaning they might switch sides to join the Germans. Also, since the war would not start in 1914, due to the fact that Franz Ferdinand would have little reason to be shot in Sarajevo, and just a few years' delay would have meant a drastically different WW1, this is an interesting scenario indeed.
Smaller detail, but Albania won't be independent now. It was Austria who enforced Albanian statehood in a move to limit Serbian gains in the First Balkan War. Without them, Serbia and Greece can partition modern-day Albania between each other.
Can you make the codes last longer than 4 days? I can't join the server
You should cover What Ifs for modern conflicts, like the War in Afghanistan or the Russo-Ukrainian War
can't really do those because too much is classified and/or mured with progoganda
The latter one is still ongoing anyway.
Generally it treated if it was of the last 20-30 years it isn’t really history but politics, that’s why only recently people started to touch Afghanistan and war on terror because it is only now going from politics into history
Thing is that to predict something we need full information, like classified documents and memoirs, which we don't have
Discord link doesnt work :(
Yo I remember voting on this like 2 months ago
When do we do the Modern Empires