War Thunder DEV UPDATED - AV-8B+ is HERE! FINALLY the US has it's MODERN HARRIER with FOX-3's!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 чер 2024
  • Showcasing the new AV-8B+ for the USMC!
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @matawg
    Patreon: / matawg
    Ajude o canal com o PIX de qualquer valor: matawg@hotmail.com
    Donate with Paypal: www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted... My Secondary GTA Channel: / @thatmatt-kq9uu
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 313

  • @EverettB74
    @EverettB74 14 днів тому +69

    The F-18 is a naval aircraft. So naturally it'll fall under the F-14.

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 14 днів тому +15

      Super Hornet will be under F-14
      Legacy Hornet will be under the Harrier
      Legacy Hornet replaced the Strike Aircrafts the A-4's and A-7's
      Super Hornet replaced Fighter / Naval ( Fleet ) defence fighter

    • @-..----.--.-...
      @-..----.--.-... 14 днів тому +4

      ​@@kajmak64bit76 I don't think gaijin will split hornets in 2 lines

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 14 днів тому +4

      @@-..----.--.-... they will because it makes sense
      Why did they split MiG-27's from MiG-23's and not folder with MiG-23?
      They are the same plane built for different purpose
      Legacy Hornet is built for CAS while super Hornet was built for Fighter multi role
      Super Hornet replaces F-14 Carrier Defence Fighter
      Legacy Hornet replaces carrier Strike Aircraft
      A-7's and A-4's are Naval too but they are not in Naval line where F-14 is because they are strike aircraft
      F-8 = Fighter
      A-7 = Striker
      They are the same plane base one just has better engine with afterburner while other has weak subsonic non afterburning engine and is smaller-ish... and cheaper probably
      Why aren't the F-8's foldered with A-7's ?
      They will have to separate Legacy from Super hornet it is only natural

    • @skatemaster33
      @skatemaster33 14 днів тому +1

      @@kajmak64bit76 It's called the F/A-18 and not the A-18. It is multi-role, meaning it can take all kinds of roles varying from A2A to A2G etc. It wasn't designed only for CAS....

    • @theeradicator110
      @theeradicator110 14 днів тому

      Yeah gaijin adding the F/A-18 Super hornet would be pretty cool alright

  • @lyudmiladias9585
    @lyudmiladias9585 14 днів тому +179

    no one will know how i got these likes

    • @hipper244
      @hipper244 14 днів тому +7

      more like the VTOL F35 at home hehe

    • @thatboydre7585
      @thatboydre7585 14 днів тому +1

      @@hipper244would be the f-35B

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 14 днів тому +3

      F-18 at home would be F-20 lol

    • @goldeneaglemercenary7711
      @goldeneaglemercenary7711 14 днів тому

      Or A-10C and A-4M at home:

    • @aydenguerra5663
      @aydenguerra5663 12 днів тому

      I wanted to fly a top tier harrier so I wanted to grind Italy but it’s in the us tech tree now woo

  • @partisan3353
    @partisan3353 14 днів тому +25

    F-18 is definitly coming soon, we have the F-18's radar on the AV-8s, we have the F-18's engine on the F-20, we have AMRAAMs, my guess is by the end of the year/christmas update or around the anniversairy

    • @triparadox.c
      @triparadox.c 14 днів тому +2

      They'll do the A10 treatment. F18 Early for $90

    • @partisan3353
      @partisan3353 14 днів тому +1

      @@triparadox.c they wont, F-18 is a "major" aircraft, it will not be getting a premium until maybe like a couple of years, the a-10 isnt a "major" aircraft like the fighters and such.

    • @theperson5185
      @theperson5185 14 днів тому +1

      If they do the super hornet itll instantly become the best aircraft in game….12 amraams and 2 sidewinders is a CRAZY load out.

    • @partisan3353
      @partisan3353 14 днів тому

      @@theperson5185 not the superhornet just yet, if anything i guess it could come, say, anniversairy next year

    • @justinwilliams2000
      @justinwilliams2000 14 днів тому

      It shoulda come out before the F-16, as the F-18 is based on the loser in the Lightweight Fighter program

  • @urosmincic2597
    @urosmincic2597 14 днів тому +40

    I DONT NEED TO GRIND ITALY NOWW!

    • @gingigaming3905
      @gingigaming3905 14 днів тому +1

      Grind it for the grippen C

    • @Vengeance4308
      @Vengeance4308 14 днів тому

      @@gingigaming3905Gripen can’t carry much ground ordnance and air rb is just going to be a missile lobbing match for the first few weeks at least

    • @gingigaming3905
      @gingigaming3905 14 днів тому

      @@Vengeance4308 ye but gripen is nice

    • @aydenguerra5663
      @aydenguerra5663 13 днів тому

      Wooooooooo

  • @AndreDiasRJ
    @AndreDiasRJ 14 днів тому +39

    To this day USA doesnt have a modernized maeines a4m

    • @Nicolas-zw5ex
      @Nicolas-zw5ex 14 днів тому +3

      A-4M were replaced with AV-8B

    • @sorincaladera936
      @sorincaladera936 14 днів тому +6

      ​@@Nicolas-zw5exwith that logic, no planes should ever be added unless its an F35

    • @Nicolas-zw5ex
      @Nicolas-zw5ex 14 днів тому +8

      @@sorincaladera936 sorry i misunderstood the comment, of course they should add more a-4 variants and such

    • @RodanES
      @RodanES 14 днів тому +3

      The A-4M has been stuck in CDK limbo for a few years unfortunately

    • @swarv5027
      @swarv5027 14 днів тому +1

      It’s actually annoying because they managed to give Israel Skyhawks and proceeded to neglect the missing gaps in the US tech tree

  • @gabj3826
    @gabj3826 14 днів тому +33

    I wonder if they’ll add more vehicles unexpectedly like with the AV-8B right here

    • @TylerJC40
      @TylerJC40 14 днів тому +12

      I hope so it would be cool for some last minute additions cause the dev has been going for a while now

    • @WZNGT
      @WZNGT 14 днів тому +7

      The A-4M had been sitting in the CDK unused for a few years...

    • @tYlrfcil
      @tYlrfcil 14 днів тому +4

      I’m hoping for an A-10C. We’re long overdue and this would be the perfect update to add it

    • @gabj3826
      @gabj3826 14 днів тому

      @@tYlrfcil couldn’t agree more

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 14 днів тому +3

      ​@@tYlrfcilF-15C MSIP 2 and New Harrier is enough
      Having a 3rd cool thing like A-10C is too much and a stretch

  • @cobracommander4609
    @cobracommander4609 14 днів тому +11

    When the hell will they add the a-10C

    • @RAM-ez8ml
      @RAM-ez8ml 14 днів тому +1

      never, we need more Russian cas

    • @thelagbros7675
      @thelagbros7675 13 днів тому +3

      @@RAM-ez8ml and more russian spaa on top of that

  • @archersparadox6472
    @archersparadox6472 14 днів тому +2

    the F/A-18 will probably come after the F-14 because it was designed to replace it to my knowledge

  • @Blueesteel_
    @Blueesteel_ 14 днів тому +1

    VERY happy they added the American av8 and I think the F18 will be with the F14s. And yes the marines do use the F18 also.

  • @n1njat0rak47
    @n1njat0rak47 14 днів тому +4

    that's not the f18 hud, that is the harrier II hud f18 hud is less cluttered

  • @Frost_x_NB
    @Frost_x_NB 14 днів тому +1

    Ooooohhh 👀😮 I was not expecting this!

  • @yujinhikita5611
    @yujinhikita5611 14 днів тому +15

    damn its missing its 4xaim120 and 2xaim9m loadout

    • @randomchannel_1923
      @randomchannel_1923 14 днів тому +5

      will probably still come since it was the same with the f15, i mean there are still 2 pylons missing on the f15 but you can carry 8 amraams which is good

    • @mattin5850
      @mattin5850 14 днів тому

      If you mean the 2 most outboard pylons, they aren't used since they aren't wired and only on the f-15EX do they started using them​@@randomchannel_1923

    • @bappojappo-_-3986
      @bappojappo-_-3986 14 днів тому +1

      @@randomchannel_1923missing pylons?

    • @ser43_OLDC
      @ser43_OLDC 14 днів тому

      What missing pilons? ​@@randomchannel_1923

    • @AZ-dj1ni
      @AZ-dj1ni 14 днів тому +1

      ​@@randomchannel_1923where are located the missing pylons?

  • @FancyPotNoob_101
    @FancyPotNoob_101 12 днів тому

    3:11 “Harrier aircraft , are the once of CAS that usually fun to play”

  • @dontpanicau7495
    @dontpanicau7495 13 днів тому

    My dude, when you where in the cockpit view, you were looking around by holding C? Your views movement was instantaneous like when you look around with C outside of the aircraft. You could even zoom in and out! Mind saying how you do this or what settings to change?
    When I go into cockpit view and I try to use C to look around there is a lag to the movement, it feels delayed, very different to pressing C outside of the aircraft and it stop me from doing sim!

  • @simon_figas1699
    @simon_figas1699 14 днів тому +2

    I'm totally getting this before the f-15c.

  • @TremendousTrash
    @TremendousTrash 13 днів тому

    yay that confirms f/a-18a+ under the bombcat instead of the strike line

  • @RealVand3r
    @RealVand3r 14 днів тому

    I am so excited this is what I was waiting for

  • @yvtteka
    @yvtteka 6 днів тому

    Looks like you got some nice keybinds

  • @Arcain321
    @Arcain321 14 днів тому +5

    Yessss!! I’ve missed flying the harrier so much

    • @Arcain321
      @Arcain321 14 днів тому +1

      Great now I have to finish grinding the strike aircraft

    • @theperson5185
      @theperson5185 14 днів тому

      @@Arcain321I feel that 😂😂 still at 4.0 with strike aircraft

    • @Noobs21088
      @Noobs21088 14 днів тому

      Same 😂

    • @Noobs21088
      @Noobs21088 14 днів тому

      At least I got av8 premium

    • @Noobs21088
      @Noobs21088 14 днів тому

      lol

  • @corybrown2197
    @corybrown2197 14 днів тому +3

    This one comes with crayons in its on board snack pack instead of spaghetti

  • @flatline9737
    @flatline9737 14 днів тому

    i've been waiting for this for years it feels like

  • @DrPandemiczZ
    @DrPandemiczZ 14 днів тому

    Damn that looks toooo nice!! ❤

  • @marcelmaster111
    @marcelmaster111 14 днів тому

    Now i want a Tech Tree A6. And while they are at it, add flare pods to F15C

  • @KinetiKo_
    @KinetiKo_ 14 днів тому

    Hey matawg, i heard there were some new camos on planes in the dev, I was wondering if you could make a video about them please? ❤

  • @thesawtoothdude
    @thesawtoothdude 14 днів тому

    There are more CAS centric variants of F-18 that would probably later follow the AV-8B plus in the tree

  • @xxsickmo7lonzxx524
    @xxsickmo7lonzxx524 14 днів тому

    Dammit now i gotta research the A-7 so i can be ready for tue AV-8B

  • @deathstarisop4791
    @deathstarisop4791 14 днів тому +1

    How many vids will you make on single Theme ??
    You made like 50 Vids on FOX-3

  • @zenki_ls400
    @zenki_ls400 14 днів тому

    id say the F/A-18s will end up in the Navy line after the F-14s i would not be surprised if the F/A-18A is after the F-14B and then the F/A-18C is added after with the F-14D with AMRAAMs being in a folder with it because apparently to some aviation education organization i forgot the name of the F-14D could fire AIM-120s and could use them but of course it never did there is a picture on wikipedia on the F-14s operational history where a F-14D is refueling over Afghanistan and you can see it has the targeting pod and AIM-9s on the BOL pod but there is a empty right side under wing pylon and underneath the plane where AIM-54s usually are there are GBUs obviously because it seems F-14Ds carried out strike missions but there were still cases of AIM-54s being used in the late 90s and early 2000s although it still say the F-14D could use AMRAAMs and should be added with them just because there would be no real point of a F-14D

  • @alvarovillatoro5187
    @alvarovillatoro5187 9 днів тому

    Well now I have a reason to investigate the American tech tree

  • @Cosmonaut_354
    @Cosmonaut_354 14 днів тому

    About time🎉

  • @thunderwithchrissy
    @thunderwithchrissy 14 днів тому

    kinda fell asleep and chaff/flare separate drops worked

  • @donscarfa777
    @donscarfa777 14 днів тому

    Has the same radar and cockpit components as an f-18 it also should be able to carry four fox 3's or six sidewinders I was ground personnel for this aircraft

  • @muralha49
    @muralha49 14 днів тому +2

    quem liga se é a mesma aeronave é o Av8B feito pelos americanos ele devia estar ai a muito tempo ja...

  • @LucentMoonlight
    @LucentMoonlight 14 днів тому

    FINALLY!

  • @elgadz
    @elgadz 14 днів тому

    7:04 it also has the same stick as F-18

  • @sherifaljeddawy2467
    @sherifaljeddawy2467 14 днів тому

    Will try to hover at 50 meters in realistic battles :D

  • @The-ThunderTiger
    @The-ThunderTiger 14 днів тому

    Dayum. 2 planes that's cool though

  • @oldcrowbr9334
    @oldcrowbr9334 14 днів тому

    Eu nao estava animado em nenhum avião...agora tenho um ora ser meu objetivo, vai ser top so jogo SB agora

  • @BinaryKiller_Recoded
    @BinaryKiller_Recoded 14 днів тому +4

    I think the F-18 will be under AV-8B, as the AV-8B has the hud and the radar from the F-18, it could make sense for Gaijin to add the plane under the harrier

    • @alainbenito24
      @alainbenito24 14 днів тому +11

      Most likely, the F18 would replace our current top tier naval aircraft, F-14 Tomcat

    • @sammie.r5347
      @sammie.r5347 14 днів тому +4

      It's a naval jet, it'll be under the f14

    • @SkullH4T
      @SkullH4T 14 днів тому

      itll probably be under f14s

    • @usarmyalaskanick
      @usarmyalaskanick 14 днів тому

      Can go under the naval fighter or attacker line.

    • @thatoneguy1741
      @thatoneguy1741 14 днів тому

      That doesnt make any sense, right after the F14

  • @GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze
    @GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze 14 днів тому

    Funnily enough the thing I’m actually most excited for about this is cashing in on all of my spading bonuses, I have every American aircraft so every time only one new one gets added, I can never finish spading it because I’d basically be throwing away 80K in free RP bonuses. With the amount I have saved up, I’ll be able to get both the F-15C and AV-8B in like 2 hours lmao

  • @SnobbyValleyGirl
    @SnobbyValleyGirl 14 днів тому

    Finally!

  • @charlie9714
    @charlie9714 14 днів тому

    YES FINALLY

  • @Real_Claudy_Focan
    @Real_Claudy_Focan 14 днів тому +20

    Hornet being F/A rather than a "pure" F, i'd put it after AV-8B+, they fulfill the same role

    • @skatemaster33
      @skatemaster33 14 днів тому +11

      not really though, the hornet is really a multi-role fighter like the F-16. It belongs to the navy line....

    • @dmsticabuse2731
      @dmsticabuse2731 14 днів тому +2

      the hornet was designed to replace the a-6, a-7, and a-4, so it should go in the strike line. the super hornet should go to the naval line tho.

    • @krin9437
      @krin9437 14 днів тому +9

      @@dmsticabuse2731Yes it was designed to replace carrier strike aircraft but it was also designed to replace the f-14. It’s a navy plane and not a pure attack aircraft, it would make the most sense for it to go after the f14.

    • @Osean_Kitty
      @Osean_Kitty 14 днів тому +2

      ​@@krin9437I think the Super Hornet is more in line than the Legacy Hornet to replace the Tomcat.

    • @krin9437
      @krin9437 14 днів тому +1

      @@Osean_Kitty Why? The super hornet is just a buffed hornet. The difference is akin to the difference between the F16A and the F16C we have in game, except the super hornet gets two extra pylons

  • @koefterofl1687
    @koefterofl1687 14 днів тому +1

    HUUUUUGE W

  • @theannihilator9167
    @theannihilator9167 14 днів тому +3

    11:37 at first we need the A-10C in that american attacker branch. and then i would guess it will be the same like the israeli F-16s. 1x F-18A and 1x F-18C (+ maybe F-18E Super Hornet after the C) after F-14s and one F-18D to the striker branch.

    • @InterstellarTaco
      @InterstellarTaco 14 днів тому

      F18 A and C would be downgrades from the F14B. You have 120s on the hornet but the flight performance on legacy hornets is awful.

    • @theannihilator9167
      @theannihilator9167 14 днів тому

      @@InterstellarTaco in that case f-14s will be stacked i guess

    • @thatboydre7585
      @thatboydre7585 14 днів тому

      @@InterstellarTaconot rlly they are great dog fighters just don’t try to rate fight 1 circle not every here needs 1 millions pounds of thrust to be good

    • @thatboydre7585
      @thatboydre7585 14 днів тому

      Not every jet *

    • @InterstellarTaco
      @InterstellarTaco 14 днів тому

      @thatboydre7585 they can get one good turn in like they SU27 then they are dead in the water. Flight performance is everything. The legacy hornets have very anemic engines.

  • @sadkermit1380
    @sadkermit1380 14 днів тому

    about time

  • @katgut
    @katgut 14 днів тому +4

    Only reason you'll see me above 10.7 in air rb

    • @patriktoth6258
      @patriktoth6258 14 днів тому

      With 9M's and MAW this thing have better chances in SB

    • @prestoo264
      @prestoo264 14 днів тому

      @@patriktoth6258this one has MAW?

    • @patriktoth6258
      @patriktoth6258 14 днів тому

      @@prestoo264 If i remember correctly one of these harrier mfs will get MAW. One thing for sure the AV8B even without ARH/SARH can be a beast in SB
      Edit:The new belgian F16 got MAW,not this thing :(

  • @santymondragon8687
    @santymondragon8687 14 днів тому

    Am I the only one who constantly hear matawg keyboard thudding the whole video 😂 like tf him pressing the keys sounded like aaa guns lmao 💀💀💀

  • @coffeecat4506
    @coffeecat4506 14 днів тому

    Huh it doesn’t seem to have the modern pilot model

  • @xxpantheroxx-3279
    @xxpantheroxx-3279 13 днів тому

    i think the a10c will be released after this harrier

  • @zenki_ls400
    @zenki_ls400 14 днів тому

    FINALLY

  • @camilorodriguez5602
    @camilorodriguez5602 14 днів тому

    now i have to grind the a7s :c

  • @observador.555
    @observador.555 14 днів тому

    the armament of this AV-8B is to be
    Air-to-air
    4x AIM-9 Sidewinder or similar
    6x AIM-120 AMRAAM
    Air-to-surface
    6x AGM-65 Maverick or
    2x Boeing AGM-84 harpoon
    2x AGM-88 DAMAGE
    source: Wikipedia
    I hope it's like that in the game too

  • @cloudkitchen-uw3im
    @cloudkitchen-uw3im 14 днів тому +1

    niceeee

  • @bencurran3204
    @bencurran3204 14 днів тому

    I want the sea harrier to get its inside pylon drop tanks :

  • @muralha49
    @muralha49 14 днів тому +1

    mais de 15 Bf109 no jogo mas reclama de colocarem o Av8 americano na américa nunca vou
    entender.

  • @Frost_x_NB
    @Frost_x_NB 14 днів тому

    All we missing now is A10C and F/A 18 Hornets and US will be complete. For now.

  • @sa80slayer85
    @sa80slayer85 14 днів тому

    The main reason to grind the Italians is now gone 😂. But i still wanna grind my way too it

  • @alexdai9024
    @alexdai9024 14 днів тому

    Not only is "F/A-18", but also US wont get F15E for at least until next year. So I think it will be added after the AV8B.
    Also US is in dying need of a top tier CAS that does not conflicts with the fighter spawn points, which AV8B is one but is useless against Pantsir.

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 14 днів тому +1

      F-15E the strike eagle would better be added in the bomber line where F-111 is
      It just makes sense

    • @positivelynaive7856
      @positivelynaive7856 14 днів тому

      Nah, F/A-18A+/C after the AV-8B, F-15E after F-111a and F/A-18E after the f-14

  • @warthunderplayer1753
    @warthunderplayer1753 14 днів тому

    Finally🎉🎉🎉

  • @Raceworm3
    @Raceworm3 14 днів тому

    Yeah, the HUD does resemble the f18's, although there are a few boxes missing. Probably just innacuracies from war thunder thi

  • @Advt2458
    @Advt2458 14 днів тому +6

    Gripen nerfed again!! what the hell

    • @Sukhoi27Flanker
      @Sukhoi27Flanker 14 днів тому +6

      Cope.

    • @L0K0M0T1V
      @L0K0M0T1V 14 днів тому +1

      Where did he mention that in the video?

    • @GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze
      @GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze 14 днів тому

      Good

    • @Advt2458
      @Advt2458 14 днів тому

      @@L0K0M0T1V watch the dev log

    • @L0K0M0T1V
      @L0K0M0T1V 13 днів тому +1

      @@Advt2458 Dude.. there is almost new devlog every day. Name the specific devlog update or datamine. Because I have looked at the past maybe 5-6 days and not seen single Gripen nerf. Last one I heard was when they reduced the turning degree by 1.

  • @spongegobler3449
    @spongegobler3449 14 днів тому

    As a German main, watching these nations get cool toys while we get a 12.7 F4 is going to make me catatonic

    • @amari2509
      @amari2509 13 днів тому +1

      dont worry we will get eurofighter 5 patches after usa and russia get 5th gens so its not so bad!!

    • @spongegobler3449
      @spongegobler3449 13 днів тому

      @@amari2509you right. 4 nations will get the Typhoon 2 patches before Germany anyways. So much to look forward to, I can hardly contain my excitement.

  • @crzyspirit
    @crzyspirit 14 днів тому

    Yipee!

  • @AllanSpeedy
    @AllanSpeedy 14 днів тому

    Hey guys what about the spawn changes for A-10s and Su-25s?

    • @kommandantkillcode
      @kommandantkillcode 14 днів тому

      Those changes are supposed to come with the major update. If they don't come in when it drops, then we'll need to get Gaijin's attention so they fix it.

  • @lieenurban1173
    @lieenurban1173 14 днів тому

    what button is it to switch the Chaff / Flare mode ?

  • @csii6478
    @csii6478 14 днів тому

    Maybe put the legacy hornet in naval line and maybe the super hornet later in the marine line that way both get represented

    • @CertifiedWarCriminal...
      @CertifiedWarCriminal... 14 днів тому +1

      no, the f18E superhornet should go to the marine line, the F18F superhornet to the naval

    • @Supajack831
      @Supajack831 14 днів тому

      Exactly- F18A/C/F should all fall under the Naval tree. The E should follow the Marine line and the B or D could be a premium or event vehicle.
      EDIT: I misspoke, the USMC does NOT operate the Super Hornets. So that would mean the Marine line would get the C or D Variants the Naval line consisting of the A/C/E/F Models (make the B an event vehicle that coincides with the release of the A),

    • @csii6478
      @csii6478 14 днів тому +1

      @@Supajack831 I didn’t actually research the hornets i just know if the legacy and super hornets variants and was just throwing it out there. You know they won’t give us every version in game.

    • @Supajack831
      @Supajack831 14 днів тому

      Absolutely true- I don’t think they’ll give em to us either. I’m hoping for the A/C/F variants. That would scratch my itch.

    • @CertifiedWarCriminal...
      @CertifiedWarCriminal... 14 днів тому +1

      @@Supajack831 i mean we have 3 F-16 variants, so we'll most likely get atleast 2 and maybe 3 variants of the f18.

  • @goblincleaver_mshm.9751
    @goblincleaver_mshm.9751 14 днів тому +1

    No amraam for F-16A MLU ?

  • @zehi04
    @zehi04 14 днів тому

    any updates on the f15c countermeasures?

    • @jollywanker9549
      @jollywanker9549 14 днів тому

      What's wrong with them?

    • @zehi04
      @zehi04 14 днів тому +2

      @@jollywanker9549 it's missing BOL pods for countermeasures

    • @Yamaha_Kid
      @Yamaha_Kid 14 днів тому +2

      It’s been Acknowledged and closed on bugs reports

    • @Yamaha_Kid
      @Yamaha_Kid 14 днів тому +3

      @@jollywanker9549it missing it’s bol witch will give it over 800 countermeasures

    • @zehi04
      @zehi04 14 днів тому +2

      @@Yamaha_Kid hopefully the bug report does something, i don't know if gaijin actually bug reports into consideration

  • @oak9065
    @oak9065 14 днів тому

    Should get 6 AMRAAMs

  • @comradechungus4147
    @comradechungus4147 13 днів тому

    gaming

  • @RAM-ez8ml
    @RAM-ez8ml 14 днів тому

    Gaijin will add anything but F-18

  • @snails-slave_1
    @snails-slave_1 14 днів тому

    Blud they added it just like that without even announcing it 😂😂😂

  • @ghst355
    @ghst355 14 днів тому

    NO FUCKING WAY

  • @OzarkCrusader
    @OzarkCrusader 14 днів тому

    Where A-4M?

  • @lukewhitehouse4103
    @lukewhitehouse4103 14 днів тому +1

    Buuut Gaijin hate America...The forums say so

  • @Rorywizz
    @Rorywizz 14 днів тому

    Can we get a buff for the Harrier gr.7 now?

    • @AZ-dj1ni
      @AZ-dj1ni 14 днів тому

      Buff what?

    • @Rorywizz
      @Rorywizz 14 днів тому

      @@AZ-dj1ni harrier gr.7

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 14 днів тому +1

      Brainrot comment section 🗿

    • @Rorywizz
      @Rorywizz 14 днів тому

      @@kajmak64bit76 skibi?

  • @MandaCoster
    @MandaCoster 14 днів тому +2

    i wonder where the J-10 is

    • @thatoneguy1741
      @thatoneguy1741 14 днів тому +1

      Should have been in the game already, same with PL12s for the JH7 smh

    • @SuiSideex
      @SuiSideex 14 днів тому

      same... should be added with f-16c and mig-29smt and still no j-10, typical gaijin... they gonna with f-22 at 14.0 and j-10 on 12.7 x D

  • @WT_Player_2003
    @WT_Player_2003 14 днів тому

    4 agm65g let's fukin gooooo

  • @ViperPilot16
    @ViperPilot16 14 днів тому

    F**king finally, literally, all they had to do is a reskin.

  • @Stalkergames916
    @Stalkergames916 14 днів тому

    Damm

  • @fiontanreed4009
    @fiontanreed4009 13 днів тому

    The f18 shoud be under f14 because its a naval aircraft

  • @blackjack8697
    @blackjack8697 14 днів тому

    so more countries gettong more fox 3 jets while ussr only gets 2, the yak141 can use the r77 why does it not get them

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 14 днів тому +1

      Why doesn't SU-39 get R-77's and R-27's
      Why won't they add SU-25TM ( SU-39 but tech tree )

    • @positivelynaive7856
      @positivelynaive7856 14 днів тому

      The yak141 was cancelled in 1991 and the r-77 entered service in 1994. Makes no sense to give it to it

    • @skatemaster33
      @skatemaster33 14 днів тому

      Because the USSR doesn't have many more fighters then Su-27 and MiG-29 derivatives. You have the Su-33 (Naval, R-77 not capable), Su-30 (Maybe, but won't differ much from the Su-27SM), Su-35 (too advanced). MiG-35 maybe?
      They can add the MiG-25 and MiG-31, but the first one has big flying toobs either radar or IR while the MiG-35 has insane long range boys. Idk why they don't add these planes tbh

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 14 днів тому

      @@positivelynaive7856 the Yak-141 we got in the game is a realistic interpolation of what would happen if the Soviet Union didn't collapse and Yak-141 wasn't cancelled... this is why it has an IRST and even radar Lmao
      So realistically it should get R-77's because it would have gotten them if Soviet Union didn't commit skill issue and died

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 14 днів тому

      @@skatemaster33 MiG-29KR would be fine... it's based on MiG-29M which is a new uhh.. second gen MiG-29 with better airframe and engines and pretty sure FULL Fly by Wire instead of a Hybrid of FBW and Hydraulics
      It can also carry more stuff because a few extra pylons... and a targeting pod with thermals i'm pretty sure

  • @mich421
    @mich421 14 днів тому +3

    At least those who play America won't complain anymore for a while

    • @ursensitiveinagayway4016
      @ursensitiveinagayway4016 14 днів тому +2

      I play 3 nations. And I see people complaining about US mains complaining just as much. Literally every player complains, and sometimes there’s a larger amount of people playing said nation noticing that it’s missing stuff. And then there’s the complainers about the said “complainers”.

    • @Nicolas-zw5ex
      @Nicolas-zw5ex 14 днів тому +1

      Bro they will always complain, mostly because their vehicles arent unbeatable

    • @gavinoreilly1501
      @gavinoreilly1501 12 днів тому

      It’s because our vehicles aren’t modeled realistically. They do not meet real life service standards/armaments.

    • @mich421
      @mich421 12 днів тому

      @@gavinoreilly1501 No nation is modeled on official things and everything is classified by various governments

  • @thatoneguy1741
    @thatoneguy1741 14 днів тому +1

    Still no PL12s for the JH7, why won’t mat bring this up😢

  • @mariuszbutlazgazem9324
    @mariuszbutlazgazem9324 14 днів тому +6

    Why f4-f ICE is not in the same battle raiting, its so stupid

    • @syfury3403
      @syfury3403 14 днів тому +2

      Faster + more missiles

    • @animeweeb2595
      @animeweeb2595 14 днів тому

      Because of the amount of missiles

    • @AZ-dj1ni
      @AZ-dj1ni 14 днів тому +1

      Yeah, Why is a supersonic plane not the same BR as a subsonic one? Its so stupid
      And why a plane with more missiles not the same BR as one with less missile, its so stupid

    • @justjake1038
      @justjake1038 14 днів тому

      Meanwhile the F15a sits at 12.3 with better fox 2 and a WAY better flight model

    • @syfury3403
      @syfury3403 14 днів тому

      ​​@@justjake1038F15 A have better fox 2 than 9 M ? Like R73 or Magic 2 ? 🤔

  • @jackozbloke5079
    @jackozbloke5079 14 днів тому

    Where is muh fuggin yak 141 wkth R77's

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 14 днів тому

      Fxk the R-77's where is R-73's
      We wanted and needed R-73's not a fckin R-27ET which replaces ER's making it almost useless

    • @positivelynaive7856
      @positivelynaive7856 14 днів тому

      The yak 141 crashed before the r-77 was made

    • @jackozbloke5079
      @jackozbloke5079 14 днів тому

      @@positivelynaive7856 no it wasn't? It test fired the thing under the USSR

    • @positivelynaive7856
      @positivelynaive7856 14 днів тому

      @@jackozbloke5079 the r-77 was put into service in 1994. And the only yak141 crashed in 1991

    • @jackozbloke5079
      @jackozbloke5079 13 днів тому

      @@positivelynaive7856 they were in testing prior to service - and fired from the Yak141, pretty sure there is a photo of it out there post launch. Not to mention there were 2 flying prototypes

  • @not_so_daring_reporter8813
    @not_so_daring_reporter8813 14 днів тому

    bro when are the devs gonna update the live servers, I'm tired of seeing this shit only on dev server

  • @eaststarling7805
    @eaststarling7805 14 днів тому

    Now the US mains can stop crying

    • @gavinoreilly1501
      @gavinoreilly1501 12 днів тому

      Talk to the German mains about them crying. We only cry when our aircraft/tank aren’t realistic which is very often. Gayjin doesn’t seem to like the US very much.

    • @eaststarling7805
      @eaststarling7805 12 днів тому

      @@gavinoreilly1501 womp womp - a British main

  • @JaronRoush
    @JaronRoush 14 днів тому

    Rip 11.0🙏🏾 aim120 vs phantom, can’t imagine who wins that one

    • @AZ-dj1ni
      @AZ-dj1ni 14 днів тому +1

      Germany have phantom with AIM120

    • @Nicolas-zw5ex
      @Nicolas-zw5ex 14 днів тому

      Phantom if it knows how to evade AMRAAM

    • @JaronRoush
      @JaronRoush 14 днів тому

      @@AZ-dj1ni I know, I was more saying for the 11.0 phantoms but yea the ice is doa

    • @raider9251
      @raider9251 13 днів тому

      f4, us phantom phlyers simply win by being cooler

  • @pustelnik6391
    @pustelnik6391 14 днів тому

    12.3 br with fox 3. That will horrible for lower br but fun to play

    • @AZ-dj1ni
      @AZ-dj1ni 14 днів тому +1

      With 2 Fox 3 and being subsonic🤔
      Yeah definitely need to increase in BR🤓

    • @pustelnik6391
      @pustelnik6391 14 днів тому

      @@AZ-dj1ni still

    • @kajmak64bit76
      @kajmak64bit76 14 днів тому

      ​@@AZ-dj1niit can carry more but that's missing for some reason

  • @Klaus_Klavier
    @Klaus_Klavier 14 днів тому +2

    Why are we missing BOL rails on all the new U.S. aircraft?

  • @RaodyOPS
    @RaodyOPS 14 днів тому

    DUDE GERMANY IS IN NEED OF MORE TOP TIER JETS WHAT IS THIS BULLSHIT ?

    • @raux6812
      @raux6812 14 днів тому

      So? Germany cant get nothing but a subtree until the eurofighter, get used to it for the next 2 updates atleast

    • @ViperPilot16
      @ViperPilot16 14 днів тому +1

      Imagine complaining about an aircraft that has already been in the game and is a subsonic going to a tech tree it should have already been in.

  • @Kleur
    @Kleur 14 днів тому

    fianllllyyyyy

  • @janickundco3762
    @janickundco3762 14 днів тому

    F18 could also go to the f16 line because of the tiny fighter concept thing

    • @bt_the_yank6234
      @bt_the_yank6234 14 днів тому +5

      No because that's the air force light fighter line. It would go in the f14 line or after the av8b

    • @treyplanter8842
      @treyplanter8842 14 днів тому +5

      Nah it's going under the 14 naval tree

    • @usarmyalaskanick
      @usarmyalaskanick 14 днів тому

      No, that’s airforce fighter. Has nothing to do with its size

    • @thatoneguy1741
      @thatoneguy1741 14 днів тому

      It’s a naval fighter not Air Force

  • @DMV_Rosco
    @DMV_Rosco 14 днів тому +20

    FINALLY