In some of the clips for 2042 you're using launch or beta footage and in other clips you're using at least Season 1 footage. Have you compared something like the water physics in the beta with how it is now to know no difference and deemed not suitable to re-record?
And overall it's a conscious gameplay choice or possibly even a game engine limitation. Anyway I personally don't miss destructible environment in COD.
also the way COD is intended to be played destruction wouldnt work. So much of COD is angles and map knowledge and awareness. Destruction would completely ruin these things
Its crazy to see how much they outshine each other in different aspects Its a competition between two biggest franchises that i enjoy But its sad to see they're not going to redeem their glory days
U cant bring back nostalgia no matter what, call of duty back in its cod 4 - black ops 2 era was an entirely different company compared to nowadays, back then there was passion for making games, now the drive is purely for money
Yeah the CoD vehicle looks cool but their physics, the driving, their controls etc… are shit in CoD. Wish they could hire some devs to work on it, Cold War has better vehicle controls.
@@melcorchancla9431 To be fair, vehicles are a relatively new concept to CoD (that tank from WaW doesn't count) so give it time to grow. If there will still be no competition (from Battlefield, just like...now), it's only a matter of time until Ground War fully morphs into Battlefield and tons of other things. It's like the next-generation CoD will be the one stop shop for all the "shooter genres" I imagine. Wish people at DICE bailed to IW, they have so much talents yet have to work under EA.
@ bruv no. The guy who literally created modern warfare and infinity ward works as the Battlefield franchise director now. Vehicles have been really good since battlefield 1942 and only improving since. MW2 has basically the same vehicle handling as 1, only visual improvements and the helis in MW2 handle worse than any other game with helicopters.
things from bf2042 that they should add to MW2: -Craters generated by explosions -Physics of movement in trees -The revolver reload animation -Destruction
Well not all parts of mw2 is upgraded so don’t get your hopes up. Characters look downgraded and shit and look very plastic skin toys . But mw2019 had better character looking tbh
Battlefield doesn't have the half of details that MW2 has, but almost everything that MW2 is lacking is related to geometry changing mechanics that on the other side Battlefield has full of.
That's weird. I literally just saw another video when you were shooting through a window in MW2, you can see the point of impact through the other window. Perhaps you encountered a bug?
Minute 6:36 when he was testing bullets going through both windows, if you check the texture it would seem like the bullet did not go through the first glass either as if it was bulletproof, which would make sense given its a cop car, and also explains why it doesnt penetrate the other window, if thats the case then thats a good detail. Edit: Bulletproof :P
@@sornevolution2263 Either way, what the bullet hole textures show Is that there is no bullet hole at all, even if its purposely made for cop cars or if every car window Is shown to have the same texture of bullet impact, that would still mean bulletproof Windows indeed do not allow for the window behind it to be pierced, which would be an accurate detail.
I get it that destruction isn’t a core feature of COD’s design but I would like to see one or two ground war maps that toy around with that mechanic. That way it can give some more attraction to battlefield fans and still not change COD’s formula too much
After the downfall of bf the people in charge finally listened to the fans and in one year the game is actually playable and fun. I was and am the biggest critic of bf. Even with the specialists the game is getting fun and good. I bought $120 game and thought i was scammed but turns out the game is really good after 1 year. Could have been better but atleast these numbskulls at dice are learning whats good n bad for the franchise.
Yeah they're definitely saving this game but they gotta keep up the content drops. but I did hear the next update is next Monday which will be adding 6v6 and 12v12 which will be apart of an event which should be fun. :)
I just returned today too and had fun. No more vehicles dominating entire games. Too bad it’s not too many players anymore with bots filling some of the lobbies
I feel like battlefields way of showing bullets hitting metal is more realistic. It's not going to glow after getting shot but even if it does it won't glow for that long
The worst bf for attention to detail against the best cod. But as a bf fanboy I gotta say im Jealous of many mechanics in MW2. I still prefer 2042 over ground war though
@@adarkwind4712yes. And using best aspects of graphics from each of the games into one single game would require more power than what current consoles or even PCs have.
2 роки тому+27
Some of my casual observations: 1:40 I have never seen a character hold a pistol THIS comfortable and true to life in most FPS games (since I might be wrong). Holding a pistol up-right and centered while crouching or in a combat-ready pose is really unnatural. That's why Battlefield 2042 looks like it's from 2012 while people are mistaking MW19 & II for actual IRL POV combat drills. Freaking ironic because DICE literally figured this out just a game earlier - Battlefield V. - 1:57 This is actually a win for Modern Warfare II. Yes BF is a war game so these physics are expected, but this really messes with visibility so no wonder why MWII decided to tone it down to a more subtle level. - 2:42 MWII has the edge on water effects but at least Battlefield 2042 has better shadows (lol). - 3:38 This one in particular boils my blood to no end, Battlefield is about all-out-war with vehicles which should have been the one coming up with this feature first. Yet out of all games, CoD is the one that actually came up with "independently damageable vehicles parts", f*cking hell. The even went the extra miles to visually show us the damage and let us repair it. Now everyone is an engineer, CoD is really eating that BF cake and it's eating good. But at least 2042 has that burning metal spot for the C5 lol (christ on a cracker what a joke of a game). - 4:41 Battlefield 2042 has better shadow & smoke effects and Modern Warfare II has better lighting and particles simulation. As expected from both. - 4:55 Well no Battlefield games have ever had ledge-hang or shooting from ladder anyway. Ladders and rooftops are always death traps. And I swear I dreamt of the Quick Draw feature for CoD like 5 years ago and seeing being implemented exactly how I envisioned it just wet my f*cking pant, holy smoke IW ya awesome. - 5:45 Somehow both game are on par with outdoor lighting, but when it comes to indoor and small light physics MWII takes the cake. - 6:22 I see Wakanda becomes a super-power in the political climate of 2042, they don't just make shield, now they make tires, Wakandan's Tire. - 6:39 You are shooting a police vehicle lol. Don't you think for a cop cabby to get both side-glass punctured by one 9mm bullet is kinda f*cked up lol?. Someone is getting a lawsuit for that. - 8:17 LMAO that MRAP nudged the IFV hahahhaha watch your jet bro watch your jet. Tho the hotspot smoke is a cool detail but not the one that make people stop to look...or care at all.
I think the lighting looked far more realistic in MW. Battlefield looks like it’s through a camera lense. But I agree with the rest, I just think it would be awesome if they added some subtle movement for the foliage when affected by wind, but nothing like BF.
Can you use a wingsuit, fly a attack heli, fly a jet, race a Polaris, or play on a map that has more than a 15 foot difference in altitude? No?? Have fun with that dolphin Dive 😆
My thing is while yes 2042 has some details that are more immersive, they are resource intensive systems that don’t have a real impact on gameplay. Like let’s compare vehicles 2042 has foliage move based on vehicle action and leave tracks behind CoD 2022 has actual lean mechanics, individual damage impacts that can expose the riders or impact drive performance, and the like. So sure immersively seeing a tree shake cause I shot my tank is cool, but I’d rather have everything MW2 has gameplay wise while not wasting resources both on my PC and of the development team on trees shaking.
I feel like the foliage moving/leaving track etc is more for the immersion of players watching the carnage, BF has always had a way of mimicking chaos and all of these environmental physics help to achieve that. Obviously less applicable to BF2042 though
I feel like bf focus’s on things that dont matter much like destructive things not the walls but trash cans and boxs just seen unnecessary where mw focus on what players would really notice
Let's be honest, both games have their own details that make them what they are... To me, comparing them is a waste of time since they are way too different, from graphics to game mechanics. PD: Great video tho!
im a Battlefield fan but, I gotta say, MW II looks great and has more variety when it come to maps. Each one of both titles has their advantages when it comes to effects of the enviroment but still, MW looks have more scores in comparation. Good job.
@@xceljinx6815 comparing the game to previous titles is when you really see how bad it is, especially compared to bf4 or 3, it feels like a worse version of the two.
MW2 has much higher graphics quality yet can be played on entry level GTX 10 series cards and requirements are also low compared to BF2042. Despite having lower qaulity graphics on BF2042 it's requirements are high and barely runs on non flagship GTX 10 series cards. Something BF2042 should learn from MW2 is optimizations !
@@RX-rd4sc yea i get what u mean and understand. But bro its a 2022 and bf4 is 2013. Dumb Ppl are gunna say Mw2022 for sure. For me man, i think its not fair… especially a game from 2013.
Bf has more environmental physics and mw2 has more player physics which is why this is hard to compare which is better looking each game does something better then the other
Tanks in Battlefield are intimidating it takes 4 rockts to kill 1 or 3 bricks of c4 the launcher reload in painfully slow and they nerfed the distance for c4 throw greatly and feels laggy when clicked
This is embarrassing. Battlefield is done until these devs stop all development on 2042 scrap it and move on. There is no coming back from this L. They need to spend 3 in half years minimum on the next game and no wasting resources on this mess
Почему CoD стала реалистичнее BF? Я не пойму, они что поменялись ролями? П.с: раньше я думал что сравнивать эти 2 серии игр это только "развлечение" для стран СНГ, лол..
Ну, знаете... Потому что у нас были журналы от людей которые похоже не очень шарили с играх (чтобы вы понимали в одном из таких журналов говорили на тему CoD MW2/3 и там сюжетной части посветили несколько абзацев, а PvP режиму только один абзац, и то он был очень маленьким) и в одном из таких журналов кто-то решил что будет отличным решением сравнить эти 2 серии игр. И потом как говорил мой дядя "пошло говно по трубам" (извиняюсь за тафтологию и цитату дяди)
I wanted to play battlefield 2042 so bad, but when I researched it the reviews were universally terrible. The game was also too expensive, as are most games these days.
@RunningInThe90s lol true. Im not even defending 2042. Even if im a bf fan, i hate what they did to the game kid. So lol im not defending IT. They Ruined my game, and hope Dice learns there mistakes. So kid im not defending this trash hero game “2042”
@@runninginthe90s75Imagine defending total garbage game which called as COD MWII, you must be bots who are getting paid by Activision 🤡
You can't compare the worst battlefield game to the latest mw game battlefield was a flop that's like comparing gta 6 to cyberpunk to show how good gta 6 is
I was a firm Battlefield fan and played it for years but in the last years BF has just been going down hill. I have never been a fan of COD but Modern Warfare 2019 actually made me a fan haha
@@runninginthe90s75 ok I'm playing both of these games, BF2042 and COD MW2 Reboot, both of these games have something called as *aspect* , both of these game have a fair amount of aspect on it, BF2042 good in terms of environmental detail aspect meanwhile the COD MW2 Reboot was good in terms of individual/player and gun detail aspect Cyberpunk 2077 was a total mess, CDPR got hacked and they lost their Source Code for CP2077 and the other games like the Witcher, not including the facts that the CDPR got sued by investor and forced to pay $1.85 million, not including the amount of gamebreaking bug that makes you often times unable to play the game normally, did the BF2042 have that kind of stuff?, The answer is *no*
Imagine playing with some guy and he just starts admiring the water physics and shooting a tree I’m not saying that in a mean way I did the same thing lol
I'm a hardcore Battlefield fan, but somehow I've become frustrated with the series.... The gunplay at 5:09 might convinced me to give Modern Warfare 2 a try. My last COD I've played was the original Modern Warfare 2
For the healing you're comparing two different things. They have an actual med pen on bf2042 been there since launch. Doesnt seem like a well thought out comparison imo
More realistic? Heavily armored vehicles don't float, hotspots don't last that long on a low caliber, you think you would be able to carry around 2 LMGs, or hold an AR and a pistol comfortably, or that tons of explosives wouldn't even scratch a wall?
As a long time BF fan... BF2042 is a f*cking joke to the series. Battlefield 4 would be more fitting for the comparison with MWII than that sad excuse for a game.
@@unapersona8352 Since when i said BF4 is trash? i'm just saying BF4 is the last good BF game and this is coming from someone who played both COD and BF.
1:21 ese sujeto regreso tan rápido cuando tú comenzaste a disparar, seguramente para ayudarte o quitarte la kill, de cualquier forma se agradece la ayuda.
@@runninginthe90s75Drugged COD fanboy fails to acknowledge reality and won’t stop buying Activision’s slop. COD Activision shills are now bored from MWII and got scammed of their $70 when MWIII came out. BF *is* the superior shooter. 🤷♂️
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 vs Battlefield 5 - Attention to Detail Comparison
ua-cam.com/video/3dEUImpzkR4/v-deo.html
1:19 your teammate literally came as he thought there is an enemy lol
Lol yeah. 😂
Teammate be like: Bro why you shooting tree l thought is was enemy? 😕
@The Mexican Dude Yes indeed
did you see that flower physic detail?
@@pdogp7751 +1 detail
Good job teammate
In some of the clips for 2042 you're using launch or beta footage and in other clips you're using at least Season 1 footage. Have you compared something like the water physics in the beta with how it is now to know no difference and deemed not suitable to re-record?
MW2 is in beta only tho, so it shouldn’t matter. If anything, a fairer comparison would be MW2 Beta vs. 2042 Beta.
@@Frosty_V0 In theory yes but clearly he doesn't see it that way because he's using season 1 footage mixed in with Beta footage.
@@Frosty_V0 it doesnt matter, the graphics have been very updated throughout the course of 2042s life so far.
@@woopdedo7939 yeah, so let’s wait for MW2 to reach season 1 and compare it to season 1 Bf
for example, 2042 has the metal hotspot detail in S2. not sure when it was added.
The reason why MW2 has no destructible walls is because MW2 doesn’t have large maps like BF2042 because a player could easily destroy the whole map
Plus mw2 is a beta
And overall it's a conscious gameplay choice or possibly even a game engine limitation. Anyway I personally don't miss destructible environment in COD.
Destruction is one of the main features in Battlefield.
@@stephenheisler3823 *was
also the way COD is intended to be played destruction wouldnt work. So much of COD is angles and map knowledge and awareness. Destruction would completely ruin these things
BTW , the light tank in MW2 can actually float on water as it is based off of an amphibious IFV IRL. Neat detail if you ask me.
True asf
Trrue
@fleisch_26 Then how come BF2042 doesn't have that
@fleisch_26 Well considering its going to be its one year anniversary, and it is still in deep shit, that is highly unlikely
@@bhaveshghanta369 it has it in bf3 portal with the lav-25
tree movement is the only thing they need to add in mw 2
How about *destruction*
@@Astral575 uh no
what else do they need to add
For what exactly? How does it affect the game?
@@lukky6648 makes it look a lot better
7:36 the designer of the funitures and houses on MW2 had enough of having to repair everything each game, so they just made everything hard af
That’ll do it
Its crazy to see how much they outshine each other in different aspects
Its a competition between two biggest franchises that i enjoy
But its sad to see they're not going to redeem their glory days
i hope they will....i hope
How the fuck is MW2 not the best looking , playing cod ever?
You guys just wanna cry about everything
U cant bring back nostalgia no matter what, call of duty back in its cod 4 - black ops 2 era was an entirely different company compared to nowadays, back then there was passion for making games, now the drive is purely for money
Although I hope im wrong with this game
the memories in our heads are always better than it actually was
Dang wish the tank in MWII had more kick
Yeah the CoD vehicle looks cool but their physics, the driving, their controls etc… are shit in CoD. Wish they could hire some devs to work on it, Cold War has better vehicle controls.
Yea there shit
@@melcorchancla9431 To be fair, vehicles are a relatively new concept to CoD (that tank from WaW doesn't count) so give it time to grow. If there will still be no competition (from Battlefield, just like...now), it's only a matter of time until Ground War fully morphs into Battlefield and tons of other things. It's like the next-generation CoD will be the one stop shop for all the "shooter genres" I imagine. Wish people at DICE bailed to IW, they have so much talents yet have to work under EA.
@ but tank in MW2(2009) already have better kick Animation
@ bruv no. The guy who literally created modern warfare and infinity ward works as the Battlefield franchise director now. Vehicles have been really good since battlefield 1942 and only improving since. MW2 has basically the same vehicle handling as 1, only visual improvements and the helis in MW2 handle worse than any other game with helicopters.
things from bf2042 that they should add to MW2:
-Craters generated by explosions
-Physics of movement in trees
-The revolver reload animation
-Destruction
Exactly
It needs none of these because it’s a call of duty game
@@mmmmayonnaise1834 People like you are the reason why BOCW was such a downgrade, please don't ruin this for us
2042 has like no destruction what the fck are u on? 2042 has the worst graphics and physics compared to the other battlefields, it fcking sucks
Destruction? Oh that's 1000 f
Gb update
MW22 was a upgrade from MW19.
But BF42 was a downgrade from its previous titles.
Well not all parts of mw2 is upgraded so don’t get your hopes up. Characters look downgraded and shit and look very plastic skin toys . But mw2019 had better character looking tbh
@@Souls_25 cause its still in beta???
@@fathblin Let's be real not much will change at launch I mean the game is gonna be in your hands in like 3 weeks.
@Anonymouz j BF shills 🤡
@@hypno18s yeah though tbh, but they had like 4 years support or smthn? Maybe that's how they gonna change stuff
In other Comparisons the heat spot is their in modern warfare an battlefield 2042 its the type of surface you shoot on in 2042 will cause heat spots.
It's done first in cod you don't even need to press
bruh dude
Battlefield doesn't have the half of details that MW2 has, but almost everything that MW2 is lacking is related to geometry changing mechanics that on the other side Battlefield has full of.
That's weird. I literally just saw another video when you were shooting through a window in MW2, you can see the point of impact through the other window. Perhaps you encountered a bug?
May be i will check it out again once the full game release
me too. i think maybe police car have bulletproof window so it's doesn't penetration with a 9mm. Try on regular car
@@nguyenbaohuy8638 thats what i was thinking also
Maybe it depends on the caliber
Mw2 beta is better than bf2042 painful launch
No.
CoD has better 6v6 battlefield has better 64
@@melcorchancla9431 bf2042 has nothing, is literally the shittiest fps of all time
@@araknome8 ua-cam.com/video/T2vUPnq1WzI/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/u-CtLLILe6A/v-deo.html
looks way more exciting than cod to me
True. The bf2042 was a dog water beta but fun
@@melcorchancla9431 it also has ground war and invasion
Lol Mw2 tanks are like little toys compared to Bf2042
yeah i noticed that 😂
Really?
True man
Well cod is a well known arcade shooter so what you expect?
@@Ahmed97855 yup. It’s shit. Dice really nail the vehicle Physics in battlefield, and I applause that 👏🏻
you are really comparing a beta with a full game? 💀
COD Betas never fully deliver anything they advertise. It’s a bait scheme.
Minute 6:36 when he was testing bullets going through both windows, if you check the texture it would seem like the bullet did not go through the first glass either as if it was bulletproof, which would make sense given its a cop car, and also explains why it doesnt penetrate the other window, if thats the case then thats a good detail.
Edit: Bulletproof :P
Hmmmm ok its probably That
most cop cars don't have bullet proof glass
@@sornevolution2263 Either way, what the bullet hole textures show Is that there is no bullet hole at all, even if its purposely made for cop cars or if every car window Is shown to have the same texture of bullet impact, that would still mean bulletproof Windows indeed do not allow for the window behind it to be pierced, which would be an accurate detail.
That’s exactly what I thought.
@@sornevolution2263 especially mexican police lol
You can crouch and press E to open doors slowly/partially in 2042.
You can do that in mw 2019 and mw2
@@lincoln2408 ya but the vid said it’s not in battlefield but it is
@@blake1535 strange video indeed, idk even what here is compared
@@denj4s Attention to detail, it even says on the screen what details are compared... ???
5:53 Rest in peace. All he wanted to do was look at the lighting.
F
F
F
F
F
I get it that destruction isn’t a core feature of COD’s design but I would like to see one or two ground war maps that toy around with that mechanic. That way it can give some more attraction to battlefield fans and still not change COD’s formula too much
Can you bring back the old editing style ? With the themes in between the different comparisons, the subtitles explaining the difference etc…
Nah he got lazy. You can tell in this video. Shit comparison.
i guess he didn't stay frosty to his editing style...
i hope he calls it "evolving" and comes out someday. that'd be fun and ironic
Overall, both are very pretty games.
It's kinda weird to think that BF2042, the final product, has less detail than MWII, a beta released just a week or two ago.
nah its weird that BF was designed as CoD! And thats the major problem!
The best of both games, that would be insane
Battlefield 2024 has physics I've never seen in a video games. Suppose you had Battlefield 2024 physics in Modern Warfare 2. It would be wonderful
2042*
2024? This should've focused on Ukraine then
Like what?
MW2 beats 2042
@@Frosty_V0 I kinda agree. But BF 2042 still beats MW in the minority.
Yes! Cod finally has water physics now.
5:19
Okay imagine a gamemode.
Quickdraw.
Pistols are the only weapons that can kill. But any weapon can inflict damage.
Your wrong
T A C T I C A L pistol always faster than reloading .
Well that sounds absolutely terrible
I like the just comparing the MW2 beta to the full launch version of BF 2042
@fleisch_26 Don't lie to yourself, bf2042 has been out of beta for ages now and it still looks like a joke.
@fleisch_26 it’s about the same
@fleisch_26 Ironicaly I would say BF1 and BF5 looks better than BF2042.
@fleisch_26 you still going?
Who hurt you?
@fleisch_26 your still going?
You forgot the stim in 2042 but all things considered great job. :)
Thank you
After the downfall of bf the people in charge finally listened to the fans and in one year the game is actually playable and fun. I was and am the biggest critic of bf. Even with the specialists the game is getting fun and good. I bought $120 game and thought i was scammed but turns out the game is really good after 1 year. Could have been better but atleast these numbskulls at dice are learning whats good n bad for the franchise.
i jumped back into 2042 and having a great time. Perfect? nope. Fun? Yep.
Yeah they're definitely saving this game but they gotta keep up the content drops. but I did hear the next update is next Monday which will be adding 6v6 and 12v12 which will be apart of an event which should be fun. :)
I just returned today too and had fun. No more vehicles dominating entire games. Too bad it’s not too many players anymore with bots filling some of the lobbies
BF 2042 is a good game? What kind of a joke is this 😂🤣
Yea lol.. so excited about it's full release in the 2023, Open Beta seems promising
I think the most important comparison is that if you had fun, and in that category, BF2042 wins.
I feel like battlefields way of showing bullets hitting metal is more realistic. It's not going to glow after getting shot but even if it does it won't glow for that long
If you shoot a container there is a hotspot in 2042
Hot spot doesn't efing exist rl
@@ireallycant4416 it does, just posssibly not always very clear, especially with a lower caliber.
2042 still manages to look better somehow. Cod always looks like someone went to the asset store and slapped everything on there...
The worst bf for attention to detail against the best cod. But as a bf fanboy I gotta say im Jealous of many mechanics in MW2. I still prefer 2042 over ground war though
I keep asking myself, imagine if the two companies got together and made a game combining the best of both
They’d probably fail in every aspect arguing over what to prioritize.
@@adarkwind4712yes. And using best aspects of graphics from each of the games into one single game would require more power than what current consoles or even PCs have.
Some of my casual observations:
1:40 I have never seen a character hold a pistol THIS comfortable and true to life in most FPS games (since I might be wrong). Holding a pistol up-right and centered while crouching or in a combat-ready pose is really unnatural. That's why Battlefield 2042 looks like it's from 2012 while people are mistaking MW19 & II for actual IRL POV combat drills. Freaking ironic because DICE literally figured this out just a game earlier - Battlefield V.
-
1:57 This is actually a win for Modern Warfare II. Yes BF is a war game so these physics are expected, but this really messes with visibility so no wonder why MWII decided to tone it down to a more subtle level.
-
2:42 MWII has the edge on water effects but at least Battlefield 2042 has better shadows (lol).
-
3:38 This one in particular boils my blood to no end, Battlefield is about all-out-war with vehicles which should have been the one coming up with this feature first. Yet out of all games, CoD is the one that actually came up with "independently damageable vehicles parts", f*cking hell. The even went the extra miles to visually show us the damage and let us repair it. Now everyone is an engineer, CoD is really eating that BF cake and it's eating good. But at least 2042 has that burning metal spot for the C5 lol (christ on a cracker what a joke of a game).
-
4:41 Battlefield 2042 has better shadow & smoke effects and Modern Warfare II has better lighting and particles simulation. As expected from both.
-
4:55 Well no Battlefield games have ever had ledge-hang or shooting from ladder anyway. Ladders and rooftops are always death traps. And I swear I dreamt of the Quick Draw feature for CoD like 5 years ago and seeing being implemented exactly how I envisioned it just wet my f*cking pant, holy smoke IW ya awesome.
-
5:45 Somehow both game are on par with outdoor lighting, but when it comes to indoor and small light physics MWII takes the cake.
-
6:22 I see Wakanda becomes a super-power in the political climate of 2042, they don't just make shield, now they make tires, Wakandan's Tire.
-
6:39 You are shooting a police vehicle lol. Don't you think for a cop cabby to get both side-glass punctured by one 9mm bullet is kinda f*cked up lol?. Someone is getting a lawsuit for that.
-
8:17 LMAO that MRAP nudged the IFV hahahhaha watch your jet bro watch your jet. Tho the hotspot smoke is a cool detail but not the one that make people stop to look...or care at all.
🤓
I think the lighting looked far more realistic in MW. Battlefield looks like it’s through a camera lense. But I agree with the rest, I just think it would be awesome if they added some subtle movement for the foliage when affected by wind, but nothing like BF.
@@khanhle8091 i agree no sarcasam intended
Yeah No the outdoors lightning in mw feels Fake and Static
6:39
Not the Point
Trying to defend CoD
🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
World war 3 vs battlefield 2042? Two really close ganes
ww3 dead game
Can you use a wingsuit, fly a attack heli, fly a jet, race a Polaris, or play on a map that has more than a 15 foot difference in altitude? No?? Have fun with that dolphin Dive 😆
2:30 i love that the c5 detonator says C5 go brrrrr
Very surprised to see how many BF shills defending this total garbage BF 2042 in this comment section. Looks like EA Dice bots are everywhere.
Ah, you're one of those people.
My thing is while yes 2042 has some details that are more immersive, they are resource intensive systems that don’t have a real impact on gameplay.
Like let’s compare vehicles
2042 has foliage move based on vehicle action and leave tracks behind
CoD 2022 has actual lean mechanics, individual damage impacts that can expose the riders or impact drive performance, and the like.
So sure immersively seeing a tree shake cause I shot my tank is cool, but I’d rather have everything MW2 has gameplay wise while not wasting resources both on my PC and of the development team on trees shaking.
I feel like the foliage moving/leaving track etc is more for the immersion of players watching the carnage, BF has always had a way of mimicking chaos and all of these environmental physics help to achieve that. Obviously less applicable to BF2042 though
I feel like bf focus’s on things that dont matter much like destructive things not the walls but trash cans and boxs just seen unnecessary where mw focus on what players would really notice
Comparing both of them in destruction is like comparing Starbucks and chipotle which has better coffee
DICE and Infinity Ward should just fu- I mean collab already and make a game together with the best of both in it
Let's be honest, both games have their own details that make them what they are... To me, comparing them is a waste of time since they are way too different, from graphics to game mechanics. PD: Great video tho!
What what?
What what what?
your right. It's childish and a waste of time to compare two drastically different games.
im a Battlefield fan but, I gotta say, MW II looks great and has more variety when it come to maps. Each one of both titles has their advantages when it comes to effects of the enviroment but still, MW looks have more scores in comparation. Good job.
honestly just hoping for more content in 2042 but until then might have to check out MW2 for a while
@@cerberusk96 yeah, im doing the same. It looks so interesting, specially the maps.
Battlefield 2042 is lacking in environment detail especially compared to previous titles
@@xceljinx6815 comparing the game to previous titles is when you really see how bad it is, especially compared to bf4 or 3, it feels like a worse version of the two.
1:19 “are you good bro?”
MW2 has much higher graphics quality yet can be played on entry level GTX 10 series cards and requirements are also low compared to BF2042. Despite having lower qaulity graphics on BF2042 it's requirements are high and barely runs on non flagship GTX 10 series cards. Something BF2042 should learn from MW2 is optimizations !
every cod game is well optimized
Please do mw2022 comparison with battlefield 3,4 also
Bruh that’s a 2022 game. And those are like from 2013-2011. So that should not be fair. They should compare old cod games
@@Souls_25 they are better than bf2042
Plus its not winning or losing cause of differences in release dates
Just wanna see
@@RX-rd4sc yea i get what u mean and understand. But bro its a 2022 and bf4 is 2013. Dumb Ppl are gunna say Mw2022 for sure. For me man, i think its not fair… especially a game from 2013.
Bf has more environmental physics and mw2 has more player physics which is why this is hard to compare which is better looking each game does something better then the other
The tires of the vehicles in 2042 are actually airless. It wouldn't make sense for them to pop
Sounds like cope tbh.
@@Web720 it’s definitely cope
Cope
As a tire enthusiast they are definitely airless tires, If you look closely there are no airholes and a small text print saying AIRLESS MILITARY TIRES
@@NandigamS cope
you seem to be using outdated footage of 2042 it seems some features you listed not in 2042 are in 2042 now
Reconozco que el movimiento de alrededor del tanque al disparar se ve brutal como tiemblan los árboles
Tanks in Battlefield are intimidating it takes 4 rockts to kill 1 or 3 bricks of c4 the launcher reload in painfully slow and they nerfed the distance for c4 throw greatly and feels laggy when clicked
MW2 feels like playing Army of two
Really love MWII water
After 17 years they added water to swim in mw
@@Souls_25 you could swim in bo3
Past years bf was always more detailed but in comparision from this bf 2042 with mw2, bf looks like a mobile game🤣
remember when battlefield had the superior graphics and physics?
@QUAD849 LMAAAAAOOOO! You should be a comedian, that was the best joke I have seen!
This is embarrassing. Battlefield is done until these devs stop all development on 2042 scrap it and move on. There is no coming back from this L. They need to spend 3 in half years minimum on the next game and no wasting resources on this mess
Почему CoD стала реалистичнее BF? Я не пойму, они что поменялись ролями?
П.с: раньше я думал что сравнивать эти 2 серии игр это только "развлечение" для стран СНГ, лол..
Ну, знаете... Потому что у нас были журналы от людей которые похоже не очень шарили с играх (чтобы вы понимали в одном из таких журналов говорили на тему CoD MW2/3 и там сюжетной части посветили несколько абзацев, а PvP режиму только один абзац, и то он был очень маленьким) и в одном из таких журналов кто-то решил что будет отличным решением сравнить эти 2 серии игр. И потом как говорил мой дядя "пошло говно по трубам" (извиняюсь за тафтологию и цитату дяди)
Груз 200 наложил…
Also the CIS countries need to get out of Russia’s cancerous “alliance”
kinda hard to take things seriously on a "Attention to detail" video when you call things "Hold it back" and "shoot through" like bruh
8:25 The hotspot is in 2042. But it seems to be only working on some Weapons/bullet types.
Distance also effects this.
Tanks and rpgs, right?
@@guilhermemigueis6593 primary weapons too.
Not all
I wanted to play battlefield 2042 so bad, but when I researched it the reviews were universally terrible.
The game was also too expensive, as are most games these days.
People really think those armored vehicles float. Bless your heart.
Ya but the impact into the water isn't realistic. Vehicles don't sink like that
You do realize there are literally amphibious tanks right?
@@Valkesion but none of the ones thrown in the water were.
Bf2042 looks like a mobile game compared to mw2
Oh the vehicle floating in beta looked like it's from Fortnite
Really it doesn’t make sense. And it’s a laugh 😂
@Anonymouz j Imagine defending total garbage game which called as BF 2042, you must be bots who are getting paid by EA 🤡
@@runninginthe90s75 oh- my god
1st they're not defending it
2nd 2042 isn't COMPLETE trash, although it is mostly garbage 🤡
@RunningInThe90s lol true. Im not even defending 2042. Even if im a bf fan, i hate what they did to the game kid. So lol im not defending IT. They Ruined my game, and hope Dice learns there mistakes. So kid im not defending this trash hero game “2042”
@@runninginthe90s75Imagine defending total garbage game which called as COD MWII, you must be bots who are getting paid by Activision 🤡
You can't compare the worst battlefield game to the latest mw game battlefield was a flop that's like comparing gta 6 to cyberpunk to show how good gta 6 is
At least when cod makes a game even if it sucks it still had more effort then 2042
Yep and the details in that game are awesome!
sucks anyway
At 0:47 mw2 is looking like arma 3
Imagine if the creators worked together to make a game
Well they were both purchased by microsoft sooooooo
@@OneNativeWolfe74 don't think dice or ea have been purchased by Microsoft
@@brandonh.1403 ea i think
@@OneNativeWolfe74 nope
@@amarskaljic7537 thanks for the correction
by the looks of things your clearly giving tests in favor of MW2.
Remember that the MW2 Beta, which has just been released, and the game, which is almost a year old, are being compared.
As a battlefield fanboy, I gotta say, the new cod looks so much better
2042 had so much potential. It’s sad what’s happened to battlefield. I like both franchises but it’s just sad to see the shape BF is in.
I was a firm Battlefield fan and played it for years but in the last years BF has just been going down hill. I have never been a fan of COD but Modern Warfare 2019 actually made me a fan haha
Long BF fans here, BF died with BF4
@@xers6704 i disagree.
Battlefield only used to be better because of its large scale match now call of duty has it too and its perfect
2042 sucks
Facts BF 2042 is total garbage, even worse than Cyberpunk 2077
@@runninginthe90s75 ok
I'm playing both of these games, BF2042 and COD MW2 Reboot, both of these games have something called as *aspect* , both of these game have a fair amount of aspect on it, BF2042 good in terms of environmental detail aspect meanwhile the COD MW2 Reboot was good in terms of individual/player and gun detail aspect
Cyberpunk 2077 was a total mess, CDPR got hacked and they lost their Source Code for CP2077 and the other games like the Witcher, not including the facts that the CDPR got sued by investor and forced to pay $1.85 million, not including the amount of gamebreaking bug that makes you often times unable to play the game normally, did the BF2042 have that kind of stuff?, The answer is *no*
try the game again
Imagine playing with some guy and he just starts admiring the water physics and shooting a tree
I’m not saying that in a mean way I did the same thing lol
Battlefield ❤️❤️
Back in the days (MW3 VS BF3) it was night & day (graphics), but nowadays it's almost the same
Wonderful content. thank you for sharing. have a good day!❤👍
Battlefield 2042 is better 👌
Ok modern warfare is obviously better
No
I'm a hardcore Battlefield fan, but somehow I've become frustrated with the series.... The gunplay at 5:09 might convinced me to give Modern Warfare 2 a try. My last COD I've played was the original Modern Warfare 2
And some of the vehicles are actually amphibious in mw2
For the healing you're comparing two different things. They have an actual med pen on bf2042 been there since launch. Doesnt seem like a well thought out comparison imo
I mean his name is stay frosty
its not, he is just trying to make 2042 look worse
I feel like the tank in real life wouldn't really float anyway. Probably sink right away but not that fast.
Shoutout to CaSPar for coming to help the homie, 1:17.
In 2042 you can see the smoke on the right, there’s just less. CoD’s smoke is unrealistic. The 2042 ballets burn the walls but only on some materials.
BF 2042 is unrealistic. Guns don't have recoil unlike in MW2 but you BF shills is defending this game way too hard like you getting paid by EA 😂
@@runninginthe90s75 Bruv i’m both a cod and BF fanboy. I’m just talking about one detail.
@@runninginthe90s75 no recoil? What are you talking about? The guns have a lot of recoil, play the game first then come back.
@@runninginthe90s75If you COD shills love getting paid and f*cked Activision, why not quit COD and touch grass irl 😉
2042 seems like the more realistic game, oddly enough.
I never thought I would see the day where COD is more realistic than Battlefield. Love the beta!
COD really took one up on Battlefield on that note.
More realistic? Heavily armored vehicles don't float, hotspots don't last that long on a low caliber, you think you would be able to carry around 2 LMGs, or hold an AR and a pistol comfortably, or that tons of explosives wouldn't even scratch a wall?
Don’t buy COD. You’ll get cancer and become Activision’s slave.
MW2 is realism in combat and BF2042 is realism in the environment
As a long time BF fan... BF2042 is a f*cking joke to the series. Battlefield 4 would be more fitting for the comparison with MWII than that sad excuse for a game.
BF died with BF4.
@@runninginthe90s75 bf 4 was cool
~a cod player that never played bf4
@@unapersona8352 Since when i said BF4 is trash? i'm just saying BF4 is the last good BF game and this is coming from someone who played both COD and BF.
@@runninginthe90s75 bf1 was also good honestly, still 2042 is a hell of a downgrade
@@unapersona8352 Disagree, BF1 is so trash because the balancing is so shit, this game is one of the worst BF when it comes to gameplay.
In Modern Warfare 2 you can shoot cars but you have to use a bigger round
1:21 ese sujeto regreso tan rápido cuando tú comenzaste a disparar, seguramente para ayudarte o quitarte la kill, de cualquier forma se agradece la ayuda.
so nobody realised the gun glitched at 6:48 ?
Beta gameplay
MW2 BETA wins imo.
COD MW2 win but as you can see every BF EA shills are really mad in this video because they hate to see garbage BF 2043 got destroyed by COD MWII 😂🤣
@@runninginthe90s75 try the fricking game, it's 100x better that MW2. And i've tried both. CoD shill.
@@runninginthe90s75Drugged COD fanboy fails to acknowledge reality and won’t stop buying Activision’s slop. COD Activision shills are now bored from MWII and got scammed of their $70 when MWIII came out. BF *is* the superior shooter. 🤷♂️
Very sad how a beta is better than a full release
It's not tho
@@DoggyPaws4 mw2 beta is better than battlefield 2042s full release.
@@DoggyPaws4 it better lol
See how many thing bf2042 doesnt hv lol
@@Wansazwan04 it is not better even with whatever detail put in the game
@@Wansazwan04 1. The bf2042 clips are beta clips and are on low setting
2. Mwii is in ultra
BF2042 win!🔥
Never broo
My Ass ! Lol
Really it does. Codmw2 is shit
BF 2042 is trash!! It worse than Cyberpunk 2077.
@@runninginthe90s75 Lol i see u been crying in every comment... 🤡
Hey 👋, actuallybf2042 has the peek feature, You can distinguish a slow movement on the door when You aim and Open it.
Try convincing the COD fanboys that and you’ll probably get guillotined.