Roe v. Wade, EXPLAINED [NO LONGER Required Supreme Court Cases]
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 лип 2024
- As of 2023, this Court case is NO LONGER a Required SCOTUS Case, but it can still show up in the MCQs, so it will be helpful to have this knowledge in your brainfolds!
GET FOLLOW-ALONG NOTEGUIDES for this video: bit.ly/3XMSawp
AP HEIMLER REVIEW GUIDE (formerly known as the Ultimate Review Packet):
+AP Gov Heimler Review Guide: bit.ly/3rfXr2Y
Additional HEIMLER REVIEW GUIDES (formerly known as Ultimate Review Packet):
+AP US History: bit.ly/44p4pRL
+AP World History: bit.ly/46rfHH1
+AP European History: bit.ly/3PCPyiw
+AP Essay CRAM Course (DBQ, LEQ, SAQ Help): bit.ly/3XuwaWN
HEIMLER’S HISTORY MERCH! / @heimlershistory
Tiktok: @steveheimler
Instagram: @heimlers_history
Heimler's History DISCORD Server: / discord
In this video Heimler walks you through yet another one of your required Supreme Court cases for the AP Government curriculum, namely, Roe v. Wade.
This decision, handed down in 1972, has generated a firestorm of controversy. The case legalized abortion on demand throughout the United States. Women's rights advocates saw this decision as a victory that put their reproductive freedom in their own hands. On the other hand, conservatives of various stripes, not least Catholic and Evangelical Christians, saw this decision as evidence of the declining morals of America.
Either way, the case was decided on the merits of a woman's right to privacy which the Court argued exists implicitly rather than explicitly in several amendments contained in the Bill of Rights.
![Social Movements and EQUAL Protection [AP Gov Review, Unit 3 Topic 10 (3.10)]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Tb6h_1eMQXE/mqdefault.jpg)
![Social Movements and EQUAL Protection [AP Gov Review, Unit 3 Topic 10 (3.10)]](/img/tr.png)
the fact that this case got overturned the same day the ap test was taken
Ayup
It's not overturned yet, just expected to be overturned.
3 months of learning the case just for it to be overturned soon. Ironic lol
So I’m curious to hear how someone who actually understands this case. Do you think it was a good decision to overturn? Or not?
@@jupiterbryant4301 overturned now
Looks like the AP gov curriculum is out of date 💀💀
just the vid is out of date. They took out this case from what ive been told.
Nope, roe v wade is still in the curriclum
@@mxgicjustice FRom what I have gone over no its not.
@@mxgicjustice no it's not 💀💀
As someone who is currently taking AP gov, it is no longer in the curriculum
Kind of wild this gets overturned pretty much the day of the AP test
LMAO IKR
technically it hasnt been done yet
But the fact that a draft was leaked is even a bigger issue!
Not taking AP gov but I need this info for today’s world lol
You're a freaking legend dude. In my sophmore year of college looking to become a history educator,and I love this channel
Heck yes! It’ll be good to have you on the roster!
Wow. Thanks for explaining this the way that you did. Very helpful. It opened a lot of ideas to how I am going to write my paper.
This is the best explanation video on UA-cam.
shoutout to the friedrich painting in the back! absolute masterpiece 👨🍳💋
you are saving my life right now omg
The moment you said abortion I was like “ohhhhh that’s why he had a whole disclaimer”
Great explanation thanks
That was excellent!
Thank you very much.
I wonder how this case being overturned will affect the AP Government curriculum, will a different court case replace this one?
Never
Dobbs v Johnson
if youre still wondering, we are expected to know the case and might be asked in MCQs about its content only. But I believe we will not be asked about it in FRQs or argumentative essays because of how controversial it is and that it's overturned, etc.
I’m in AP Gov rn, and I looked at the college board which they said Roe v. Wade is not expected to be on the 2023 AP Exam
Ahhhhhhhh…… 2022 gonna be even more wild than I thought 😅😅
1st week of Summer,
the fun is just starting.
Time to update this video 😳
Does anyone remember watching the livestream w two other teacher/creators? My students enjoyed them as well last year but I can’t find their names. Anyone please
Ben Freeman and Emily Glankler (Anti-Social Studies)?
first and I’m not even taking AP gov
Love it
Soooo, if it gets overturned is this still gonna be required?
We're prolly just going to have to remember both cases now T^T
If you're still curious, it's part of the curriculum this year but is most likely not on the AP exam.
@@wiiugamer7595 Haha Im taking ap gov this year and IT IS NOT REQUIRED ANYMORE PHEW
thank god im cramming rn the mock is tmrw (one less SC to do )
My grades from AP gov aren't the greatest, I haven't gotten any good scores on my mcqs, any tips for studying?
give up
Howd u end up doing?
@@mahirmehmud1578rude
Has the attempt to overturn Roe vs Wade ever been led by a woman? Or is this all about men deciding what women can do with their bodies?
Probably men who don't want to pay child support.
Oh no no no. Men have to lead that. Who can't have babies. That's like letting only the mom decide whether a boy should be circumcised or not.
Amy Coney Barrett voted to overturn it
We're all birthing people now. Your rules, not ours. Lmao
@@emmittmatthews8636
Wrong issue, dude.
Will this affect csections
Is the constitutional principle here the equal protection clause or due process clause?
It’s the IMPLICIT right to privacy
@@heimlershistory but if they ask u on the scotus frq what do u say
@@jeremychung948 he literally said it😭 you’d say the implicit right to privacy
Heimler is wrong. The Due Process Clause was the primary tool used to justify this ruling. They extrapolated a right to privacy from solely the Fourteenth Amendment, rather than the Ninth Amendment (which was used in Griswold).
have to take the test next week 😨
Time to update the video
Glad they're settled down about the argument.
thanks
Is this case still going to be on the 2023 ap gov exam??
Yep
@@heimlershistory HEIMLER I LOVE YOU THANK YOU FOR ALL YOU DO
My teacher said it was not?
actually, no, the College Board website says "Consequently, teachers and students should not expect exam questions related to Roe v. Wade on the 2023 AP Exam."
@@alisonhanshaw1508 it is not
Too much K here. That's B and D also. What else do the have in the way of opportunity?
So question ( not in AP gov) but how does this pertain to the new Texas abortion laws?
Texas passed their abortion law in direct contradiction to the ruling in Roe. In this decision, abortion was made legal without restriction in the first trimester. The Texas law made abortion illegal after fetal heartbeat (roughly 6 weeks). They did it because they believe there’s a good chance the current SCOTUS roster of judges will take the occasion to overturn Roe.
@@heimlershistory objectively speaking, that’s clever of Texas
@@mujtab8siddiqu1 The 6 week bill is rly bad because most people find out they are pregnant around 4-9 weeks.
Done!
It happened…
I guess we saw
Well, this video is relevant.
Reckon it is
this is the first time im mad i have to do less work
This aged well
And we are OVERTURNED! Boom!
Whelp… Now we got to memorize Dobbs… rip...
If we take responsibility for our actions both man and women. We wouldn't be arguing about killing a fetus/baby.
What the..
Great explanation but that last part was purely your opinion
this video basically sticks out like a sore thumb, now that it is a no longer required case
Well. Now it has happened
It has indeed
“Remains to be seen” (Sigh)
Safe , Legal and Rare.????
OK, now what ?
I don’t rightly know… crazy day
The fight goes on.. both ways.. forever and ever. Now it's just at the state level, but we'll see what happens in the future.
So much is left out of this smh
@@dantheman9919 lol I know , I just didn’t feel like it was an intellectually honest explanation. To each their own
Welp now this case got overturned
i wish i could hug you (cramming)
I wanna hug you too shrenyanshu I hope you did well
So in much simpler sense, Roe v. Wade made abortion an option? Got it. (Non-American here)
Yes.
No.
@@notcosmiclobsternoooo118 Why no? Can you explain?
No, Roe v Wade limited the states ability to prevent abortions before the 3rd trimester, much in a similar way that England used to tax us, without representation.
Now that the decision is overturned the other side of the issue is grappling with the democracy sidestepping loophole that can occasionally be the supreme court.
@@JrSwar07 this case gave people the right to medical privacy, it’s not only about abortion
There's over 500,000 kids in foster care or wards of the state in the US. The system is completely over run. Most of these kids develope psychiatric problems. The system is all ready exasperated. So... Tell me. How will we cope with even more people who need help? We can't take of the ones here all ready.
Chill bro, this is to help ap gov students study for exams, not for you to try and start arguments in the comment section
There are over 1 million elderly people in nursing homes in the US ... most of them develop psychiatric issues and are totally dependent in all aspects of care. Should we kill them ? 🤔
I don't think the answer is to end a life because they overwhelm a system. Who are we to decide that?
Wouldn't it make more sense in the case of abortion to hold the two people that did the act to create the new life accountable for their actions? Is it THAT hard to abstain from doing the act of sex? It's really easy to avoid the consequence of having sex if you aren't ready to be accountable for those consequences. I don't see the difficulty at all. And before anyone brings up the scenarios that make up less than 2% of abortion cases ... let's remember an overwhelming majority are performed simply for convenience for the mother.
The disabled, the elderly are financial burden cause they cannot take care of themselves should we kill them off too
@@immanuelbartsch4439 - actually first, look up your 1st amendment! Second
, the title doesn't imply that. It's an explanation... you can study with it or scrutinize it with a wine bottle. Relax yourself
AkNeWlEgED held the egrigiously wrong opinion that there could be such a thing as an 'interrest in the live of the fetus'. There is not.
*1973
Andddd its outdated
Aaaaaaaas are you
People need to realize how critical Roe v Wade is to medical privacy and other laws.
But they don’t care about that, they just want to police women and keep them in check
@@Orangeyougladx3It was Constitutionally incorrect.
Why is it that the left thinks that Roe MUST be (have been) followed by every state to the letter of the... ruling.
Yet states don't have to abide by 2a, 45/50 state constitutions that also protect the 200+ year old right to bear arms, and MULTIPLE Supreme court rulings?
Throughout history, one of the most controversial questions in any society is this: "Where do we draw the line between people who are and who are not first-class citizens entitled to all the protections of the law. This includes protection from being killed by someone else."
So it is not surprising that abortion is controversial. Whenever a society draws that line between when it is and is not OK to kill someone, controversy always ensues.
One thing that I strongly disagree with Steve is when he describes different positions as "liberal" or "conservative' on where to draw this line with respect to the abortion issue. I know plenty of people who are very left-wing liberal and who are pro-life because they are liberal. The same thing that leads them to draw the line to include racial minorities also leads them to draw the line to include unborn children.
We don’t really disagree. I know it’s more nuanced. However, remember to keep in mind that I’m reviewing curriculum to help students study for exams, not giving a nuanced account of all I believe.
@@heimlershistory Yes, and you do a truly excellent job of helping students. In my opinion, you are among the absolute best people on UA-cam who is putting out historical material. And the AP curriculum provides an excellent framework to study history.
Perhaps the thing that I like the most about what you do is how you handle controversial issues. There are many such issues in the AP curriculum. It is possible to make out an argument for what one believes while respecting those who disagree. And you do.
One recent trend in US society that I disagree with is people are increasingly aligning their beliefs according to the "liberal" or "conservative" party line. For example, there used to be many pro-life Democratic Party supporters and many pro-choice Republican Party supporters. Not any more.
I consider myself to be a pragmatist, which means that I have some beliefs that are traditionally "liberal" and others that are traditionally "conservative." For example, the First Amendment's establishment clause. In my opinion, if you think that a law is establishing a religion, then you have to be able to say which religion is being established and how that law is privileging that religion. That is a "conservative" interpretation which would allow New York's generic school prayer.
On the other hand, I strongly disagree with the US Supreme Court in saying that the 2nd amendment sets up an individual right to bear arms. Nowhere does the text of the 2nd amendment ever state that. In my opinion, the first sentence of the 2nd amendment makes it clear that state National Guard units (as a well-regulated militia) are OK. As far as I know, there are zero other countries in the entire world whose provinces/states have a right to maintain a military force. That is, of course, a "liberal" interpretation of the 2nd amendment.
Which means that I support people thinking for themselves and making their own decisions about controversial issues. And your excellent videos provide information to enable people to do just that.
@@kevinlove4356 We were really the only country that protected the right of individuals to keep and bear arms even back then too. 🤷♂️
I mean... it's Madison..."Father of the Constitution" saying it's an individual right that the people have, which no other people around the world do.
... in the Federalist Papers nonetheless ...describing the new Federalist system and Constitution.
🤷♂️
"Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." ~ James Madison - Federalist 46.
@@emmittmatthews8636 This is, of course, totally untrue. The English "Bill of Rights" which received Royal Assent on December 16, 1689 contains a right to bear arms. So does its equivalent in Scotland. As with the USA's second amendment, this is not an unlimited individual right.
@@kevinlove4356 I posted 3 comments in response.
Not sure what all you can see, what with this... platform being the way it is.
Can you explain how the right to privacy extends to the right to get an abortion? I’m not the brightest guy, but I just can’t get my head around how those two things are remotely related.
Assume you take the perspective that life begins at conception. How does your right to privacy ensure your ability to terminate another human life? Even if you don’t believe that’s a life, it’s undoubtedly a potential human life. Why does your right to privacy allow you to end that potential?
And wouldn’t this logic then extend to euthanasia, or assisted suicide? If the right to privacy allows you terminate the (at least potential) life of another with entirely unique DNA, it definitely would allow you to terminate your own life, right?
I mean, I suppose you could make the argument that the right to privacy (implicit within the bill of rights) also extends to the right to keep one's medical history and medical decisions private, which would therefore mean that the government cannot infringe upon the medical procedures one chooses to undergo. Even in the case that someone believes life begins at contraception, abortions are still a medical procedure, and if a person has the right to keep their medical history and medical decisions private, then they have the right to get an abortion.
As for your question about euthanasia and assisted suicide, I'm not exactly sure. I am not too knowledgeable on either of these topics.
The right to privacy does not extend to the right of abortion. It’s stupid and we are trying to overturn that.
@@littlepwnrr I hope you fail :)
@@littlepwnrr it’s doesn’t really connect but I’m am extremely glad that it made abortion legal for women. Sadly people are trying to make it a illegal again
Hm so you can say in simple terms that someone out there is prego and of course it's none of our business of how she got prego, so its the right to privacy here. When someone is prego, there's tons of changes to the body, and which is super risky for the mother in biological perspective. Theres also other factors like financial factors, social factors, and even people who got unwanted pregnancy through someone forcing them to open their legs, which makes people consider abortion. In my opinion, if abortions were completely banned, then the mother mortality rate would increase by a lot. And ur question is valid, but the reason why this topic is controversial is because no one knows when the true human life starts. one person could say at 3rd trimester another person could say 1st trimester. In my opinion, it should be up to DOCTORS who decide medical abortion laws for humans, not ignorant politicians
Lmao
I love you
What happened to the baby
This aged well. I will miss you, Roe v. Wade.
Hello everyone this is the famous Roe Vs Wade Annnnnnndddddd it's gone!
Thankfully we’re now in the dobbs age instead that of roe
praise jesus
For those who do not understand, the overturning of roe is a good thing lol fed govt cannot say when you can and can’t get an abortion.. it falls back on the state to decide… meaning you.
Your point would be correct if all states allowed for that decision to be made for the individual under reasonable circumstances.
Sooo christian supremacy
Ah.. no
@@emmittmatthews8636 explain
@@Gabe-cv4yr Was Roe v. Wade Atheist Supremacy? 🤔 lol
If the SC ruled that all abortion, nationally, was banned or heavily restricted then I would tend to agree with you.
It just overturned a poorly constructed ruling, and correctly returned power to the states.... Which STILL isn't a perfect solution.
Some republican states will go to far imo. So, yeah.. some "Christian Supremacy" I guess..but in democratic states they allow late term abortion, so is that Atheists Supremacy?
This issue sucks in all honesty.
It will never go away either. 🤷♂️
1
@@emmittmatthews8636 last time i checked lated term abortion is less than at about 1%. Thats when it looks human so its harder/virtually impossible for a human to justifiably abort it. When its a cell with no organs then it makes sense, Christianity before what it was today had no such opposition to the idea, alot of other major religions dont.
Say no to ABORTION!!
Natural law is worthwile only IF you mean every human has a right to their own person.m
Overturned! Amazing. Power to the states!
If states can determine our right to privacy, what can’t they do?
@@sebastianyepez6204 ending a human life should never grant you the right of privacy to the law
@@leonardobonilla7701 not amazing in the slightest
@@sebastianyepez6204 associating abortions with privacy is one of the biggest stretches in Supreme Court history. Sounded much more like judicial activism than anything
@@galaxybrain97
So go ahead and give up your right to privacy. All this burden on women by the very people who actually create the pregnancy Hypocritic neanderthals.
Do you think your God?
Did God give up His job to republicans?
L
Roe v wade died today.
I’m still a little shocked by it
I think abortion is wrong! If these people think it is okay, let them pay all medical expenses themself! I do not want my money going towards this awful act! Where would these people be if their parents had decided to abort!
Regardless of your personal beliefs everyone should have the right to do what they want with their body.
good for your opinion, but I think you're on the wrong type of video to be talking about this stuff.
@@jacobrendon13 Read the Bible
@@TheGreatAndYOU not everyone is christian bro... freedom of religion in the first amendment
@@jacobrendon13 it's not just thier life. They are carrying a child that has the constitutional right to Life liberty and the pursuit of happiness
"According to their worldview life began at conception"
Um.... no... that isn't just their worldview mate. Catholicism doesn't have a monopoly on a scientific fact.
Yep, that’s not what I was saying. I was acknowledging that different people make different assumptions about the world…
Man/ women, must understand what is mean to have sex. To actually procreate. When u have sex you are starting the process to procreate. This isn’t just a game and man/women want to get a 🥜 off. Understand what you are doing. Also… teach these younger kid to not practice sex in high school, junior high. It’s not cool at all.
Well said
Ehhhh... there are some adults that have babies and are worse than those high schoolers!
Brain cows milked?? Stick to history
Killing a person is never the answer. I don't care what the circumstances are. Don't kill babies!!
What about communists? 🤔
yea but what if the child is endangering the mother's life.
@@editsforyoutubetotal4743 Too bad. It's not the baby's fault.
@@BettyWhite2171 well I guess so but if the mother dies so does the baby
@@editsforyoutubetotal4743 Wrong.
U have control … to keep ur legs closed lol 😂
Make 304's great again