I have seen this problem with some men : They have huge egos and are closed as persons, and nobody wants to live with a closed person Also if a man has the playboy sindrome or is not loyal he has to stay single if he can't evolve. On the other I have seen this problem with some women : They have a kind of arrogance that since women know feelings better, they have nothing to learn from a man, and the man just has to do what these women say. If a woman has this type of arrogance she should stay single if she can't evolve. Nobody wants to live with an arrogant person. In a good relationship both women and men learn from each other and the direction for both is to strike and keep working at balance and doing what is right for both and finding compromises and if they can't agree on some reasonable compromise for both, they can separate Women are important and have feelings to be considerate to, but Men are important and have feelings to be considerate to In this we are the same, maybe these problems stem from this prejudice label that implies men think women are important just so they can make sex And this prejudice label that women think men are guilty because they only want sex and have no real feelings and thus the only solution is to obey women in everything This is not true so we need to evolve Opening the channels of comunication with courage is the solution We both can have deep feelings and can learn from each other how to evolve We are a beautiful work in progress: Enjoy the learning and the love ❤
Ok there's a few of you out there. So men are just supposed to be subservient to women we're supposed to change what we've been our whole lives. While women just do nothing. Not a single person should change for anybody. This guy and his wife and all their cronies are scam artist. Telling people do this or that. Bull. They have you people so brainwashed
The amount of grey matter of a man's brain is more, while white matter is more in a woman's brain. And what's more the amount that it does so is different from person to person creating variety.
The book has been very useful for me and I am grateful I read it But on the negative side two tips and advises are pushy and in one advice a tip not sensible to men which if said to a woman would be absurd. ( Tips and advises should be suggested to the reader, not pushed ) Making compromises is more right and if two people can't compromise they can separate I wrote it on the review and they censored it Red flag
Trustworthiness is definitely a worthy quality that we should look for in the people we are in relationships with, but it's not attractive as such. Women aren't attracted to trustworthiness, they're attracted to masculinity, power/status, dominance, or rather, the personal characteristics that indicate those perhaps more so than the results of them. (Harvey Weinstein obviously proved that having power and status wasn't a guarantee that women would be attracted to you). Why else do women have affairs with married men? I mean, that's the indicator of lack of trustworthiness right there - the man is in a committed relationship but betrays it to be with the 'other woman'. But the married man has status in that he's been preselected, he has more status in that he's already got what the single woman wants, and he presents a challenge to be won over, validating the woman's femininity and sexuality when he does. And I would believe that women are attracted to confidence/appropriate assertiveness and turned off by arrogance, but there are plenty out there who would take an Arrogant Bastard over a Milquetoast Mouse, not even if MM has a Nobel peace prize and AB has a criminal record. I'm pretty sure women appreciate the prosocial aspects and the character of a man they're in a relationship with, but in and of themselves, character, honor, agreeableness and kindness aren't specifically attractive to women. I'd say women hope for these things in the men they're attracted to but they're certainly not the things that seal the deal, so to speak.
Awesome summary of the book I am about to read. Your detailed information about the book makes me even more excited for the read, thank you.
Thank you for the summary! I want moreee
Nicely explained, loved the way you put the details.
Very well described Thumbs up 👍
I am committed to being a great lover & a compassionate leader in all my intimate relationships with women in my life as well as my community
I have seen this problem with some men :
They have huge egos and are closed as persons, and nobody wants to live with a closed person
Also if a man has the playboy sindrome or is not loyal he has to stay single if he can't evolve.
On the other I have seen this problem with some women :
They have a kind of arrogance that since women know feelings better, they have nothing to learn from a man, and the man just has to do what these women say.
If a woman has this type of arrogance she should stay single if she can't evolve. Nobody wants to live with an arrogant person.
In a good relationship both women and men learn from each other
and the direction for both is to strike and keep working at balance
and doing what is right for both and finding compromises
and if they can't agree on some reasonable compromise for both, they can separate
Women are important and have feelings to be considerate to, but
Men are important and have feelings to be considerate to
In this we are the same, maybe these problems stem from
this prejudice label that implies men think women are important just so they can make sex
And this prejudice label that women think men are guilty because they only want sex
and have no real feelings and thus the only solution is to obey women in everything
This is not true so we need to evolve
Opening the channels of comunication with courage is the solution
We both can have deep feelings and can learn from each other how to evolve
We are a beautiful work in progress:
Enjoy the learning and the love ❤
I am definitely a woman. Lol I read the book, this summary is accurate and amazing.
I'm so glad!
Ok there's a few of you out there. So men are just supposed to be subservient to women we're supposed to change what we've been our whole lives. While women just do nothing. Not a single person should change for anybody. This guy and his wife and all their cronies are scam artist. Telling people do this or that. Bull. They have you people so brainwashed
The amount of grey matter of a man's brain is more, while white matter is more in a woman's brain. And what's more the amount that it does so is different from person to person creating variety.
The only book of his I did not like. I absolutely love their two day workshop however.
why so?
The background music is SO ANNOYING!!
The book has been very useful for me and I am grateful I read it
But on the negative side two tips and advises are pushy and in one advice a tip not sensible to men which if said to a woman would be absurd.
( Tips and advises should be suggested to the reader, not pushed )
Making compromises is more right and if two people can't compromise they can separate
I wrote it on the review and they censored it
Red flag
Well, the unplugged alpha begs to differ
This is simping
Trustworthiness is definitely a worthy quality that we should look for in the people we are in relationships with, but it's not attractive as such. Women aren't attracted to trustworthiness, they're attracted to masculinity, power/status, dominance, or rather, the personal characteristics that indicate those perhaps more so than the results of them. (Harvey Weinstein obviously proved that having power and status wasn't a guarantee that women would be attracted to you). Why else do women have affairs with married men? I mean, that's the indicator of lack of trustworthiness right there - the man is in a committed relationship but betrays it to be with the 'other woman'. But the married man has status in that he's been preselected, he has more status in that he's already got what the single woman wants, and he presents a challenge to be won over, validating the woman's femininity and sexuality when he does.
And I would believe that women are attracted to confidence/appropriate assertiveness and turned off by arrogance, but there are plenty out there who would take an Arrogant Bastard over a Milquetoast Mouse, not even if MM has a Nobel peace prize and AB has a criminal record.
I'm pretty sure women appreciate the prosocial aspects and the character of a man they're in a relationship with, but in and of themselves, character, honor, agreeableness and kindness aren't specifically attractive to women. I'd say women hope for these things in the men they're attracted to but they're certainly not the things that seal the deal, so to speak.
Best wimping guide
The guide to remain single in 2022 described perfectly
This is all for old people. Girls in their younger age will go for the guys who do the opposite.
bro's def against science
Most women aren't loyal now a days bro they only like play boys@@Shayistic