The Reagan Revolution: Crash Course US History #43

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 чер 2024
  • In which John Green teaches you about what is often called the Reagan Era. Mainly, it covers the eight years during which a former actor who had also been governor of the state of California was president of the United States. John will teach you about Reagan's election victory over the hapless Jimmy Carter, tax cuts, Reagan's Economic Bill of Rights, union-busting, and the Iran-Contra among other things. Learn about Reagan's domestic and foreign policy initiatives, and even a little about Bonzo the Chimp.
    Hey teachers and students - Check out CommonLit's free collection of reading passages and curriculum resources to learn more about the events of this episode. Ronald Reagan signaled a shift to conservative values on the role of government, discussed in his "Time for Choosing" Speech: www.commonlit.org/texts/from-...
    America turned to President Reagan for comfort in times of tragedy, including following the Challenger Disaster: www.commonlit.org/texts/ronal...
    Chapters
    Introduction: The Reagan Era 00:00
    Reagan's Election in 1980 1:00
    Reagan's Supporter Base 1:41
    Reagan's Vision of "Freedom" 2:21
    Lowered Tax Rates 4:00
    Mystery Document 4:20
    Supply-Side/Trickle-Down Economics 5:31
    Government Spending in the Reagan Era 6:36
    1980s Wall Street 7:20
    Growing Economic Inequality 8:17
    Reagan's Moderate Policies 8:59
    Reagan & the End of the Cold War 9:49
    The Iran Contra Affair 12:22
    Credits 13:47
    Crash Course is on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at / crashcourse
    Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
    Facebook - / youtubecrashcourse
    Twitter - / thecrashcourse
    Instagram - / thecrashcourse
    CC Kids: / crashcoursekids

КОМЕНТАРІ • 5 тис.

  • @user-cg9ng2mx8l
    @user-cg9ng2mx8l 7 років тому +3592

    1:05 "Anyone could have beaten Jimmy Carter."
    Except Gerald Ford.

    • @drakekendall5095
      @drakekendall5095 4 роки тому +209

      He's saying anyone could beat Jimmy Carter in 1980. Gerald Ford barely lost in 1976 because of 3 things: People had a bad taste in their mouths from Nixon, Reagan gave him a heavy primary challenge which divided the conservatives and demoralized Ford supporters, and Ford was viewed as illegitimate since he was 3rd in line to the Presidency aka an unelected President. People quickly realized Jimmy Carter was a big, fat mistake after he was inaugurated. He was never popular.

    • @0108dylan
      @0108dylan 4 роки тому +107

      That’s not true. Carter was popular for a decent chunk of his term.

    • @alwillk
      @alwillk 4 роки тому +28

      @@0108dylan Not at the end.

    • @mrrogersrabbit
      @mrrogersrabbit 4 роки тому +15

      @@drakekendall5095 One more thing: the NY Daily News's "Ford to City: Drop Dead" headline. Ford went on to lose NY by 4%. If that 4% swung the other way, New York would have gone red and cost Carter the election.

    • @ronniebaker4549
      @ronniebaker4549 4 роки тому +57

      He had a 74% approval ratting before Delta Force failed the Hostage rescue mission

  • @AlternateHistoryHub
    @AlternateHistoryHub 10 років тому +4723

    It isn't American history, without a jab at the French

    • @savvapouroullis7927
      @savvapouroullis7927 10 років тому +373

      It isn't anyone's history without a jab at the French.

    • @lukejohns5869
      @lukejohns5869 6 років тому +12

      AlternateHistoryHub so true

    • @Keres8096
      @Keres8096 6 років тому +82

      Yet, they were a huge factor in the creation of this country.

    • @drdejesus21
      @drdejesus21 6 років тому +75

      Garrett Baumann This. America arguably would not have won their independence without French naval help.

    • @yeshualawson
      @yeshualawson 6 років тому +10

      Shawny D and they wouldn't have won theirs in wwI and WWII without our help. 2 to their 1 they still owe us one

  • @skeltonslay8er781
    @skeltonslay8er781 5 років тому +4334

    Reagan’s best moment is when he is giving a speech and hears gun shots and then goes “missed me”

    • @abhiprakash74999
      @abhiprakash74999 4 роки тому +155

      What??? that actually happened ?? Damn that's a cool guy

    • @alahjandrodagrate1611
      @alahjandrodagrate1611 4 роки тому +479

      Abhi Prakash it was a balloon popping, but it sounded like a gunshot during the speech. Still hilarious

    • @rileyh520
      @rileyh520 4 роки тому +276

      @@abhiprakash74999 yep it happened. It's even better in the context that he survived a previous legitimate assassination attempt

    • @bothi00
      @bothi00 4 роки тому +200

      In the surgery room following his assassination attempts, he said to the surgeon "I hope you're not democrats" before going under anaesthesia.

    • @lukeswain1463
      @lukeswain1463 4 роки тому +90

      Nah his best moment was dying

  • @lurchingdeath2642
    @lurchingdeath2642 4 роки тому +1833

    anyone else here bc your teacher can't find something better to assign you for online classes during coronacation

  • @loltshy
    @loltshy 8 років тому +4460

    is it just me who's watching this series for fun not for AP tests? I'm not even American.

    • @Sh0cKwavE__
      @Sh0cKwavE__ 7 років тому +75

      I am, btw I'm an American

    • @GregTom2
      @GregTom2 7 років тому +133

      That's not too surprising. Americans aren't known to learn for fun.

    • @Sh0cKwavE__
      @Sh0cKwavE__ 7 років тому +40

      GregTom2 but, i am watching for fun and im an american whos too lazy to put lines in my words

    • @chandruae
      @chandruae 7 років тому +75

      Oh yes. I'm an Indian (from India) and have watched the entire Crash Course US History series. It's quite fascinating!

    • @shaywright6608
      @shaywright6608 7 років тому +51

      I'm watching it for fun. I love history

  • @squamish4244
    @squamish4244 7 років тому +1666

    Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this comment section!

    • @thatguyoverthere468
      @thatguyoverthere468 5 років тому +9

      Heheh I see what you did there

    • @browngirlinaclownworld2077
      @browngirlinaclownworld2077 5 років тому +55

      Mr. Gorbachev might also want to tear down this video. It kinda breaks my heart how little credit he gets for ending the Cold War. That pudgy bastard was 80% of the reason it ended. With another Brezhnev in office, the Cold War might have gone on to this very day.

    • @asielmilian38
      @asielmilian38 5 років тому +11

      @@browngirlinaclownworld2077 agree. Thank god we had Reagan.

    • @noice2606
      @noice2606 5 років тому

      😂

    • @louise-yo7kz
      @louise-yo7kz 5 років тому

      Wow!🙄

  • @trpc6894
    @trpc6894 4 роки тому +369

    5:45 look very closely at John Greens forehead. A mark emerges at the same time his voodo doll is stabbed. Genius

    • @guykruger1
      @guykruger1 4 роки тому +5

      That was so painful to watch!

    • @mariyahndiaye1357
      @mariyahndiaye1357 4 роки тому +6

      That freaked me out. Is this clever or sinister🤔

    • @eva-sue
      @eva-sue 4 роки тому +4

      i saw that and thought i was tripping for like 5 minutes straight

  • @platosplatoon6873
    @platosplatoon6873 5 років тому +379

    I'm British... but i'm going to become an AP US history teacher very soon so def feeling the pressure.
    Thank you John Green.

    • @drakekendall5095
      @drakekendall5095 4 роки тому +27

      Make sure not to be biased against conservatives! This guy is definitely biased against Reagan.

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 4 роки тому +2

      @@drakekendall5095
      Reagan flooded the country with Democrat illegal aliens and republicans are about to be made a national minority because of it.

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 4 роки тому +1

      @fm'latghor
      You do know how immigration and demographics works, right?

    • @garfieldfarkle
      @garfieldfarkle 4 роки тому +13

      @@gregorymalchuk272 Republicans have long been a national minority.
      In the last 28 years, they have gotten a majority of the vote only once in 7 elections.

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 4 роки тому

      @@garfieldfarkle
      That's because of amnesty and democrats flooding the country with immigration. The elections aren't legitimate anymore.

  • @Gusativo
    @Gusativo 8 років тому +1223

    the most shocking part of this video was the "carpeted bathroom". WHY AMERICA?

    • @jakestockton4808
      @jakestockton4808 8 років тому +11

      100% true

    • @alihaleem8264
      @alihaleem8264 7 років тому +28

      Gustavo Palamone my house was built in 1980 and the floor in the bathroom was carpet before we changed it several years ago.

    • @Strawberry92fs
      @Strawberry92fs 7 років тому +75

      I was born in 92 and I remember carpeted bathrooms. Terrible, terrible idea.

    • @thisisaname5589
      @thisisaname5589 7 років тому +21

      Because America. Love it or GTFO

    • @merrittanimation7721
      @merrittanimation7721 7 років тому +10

      THE HORROR

  • @MrBasedgod510
    @MrBasedgod510 8 років тому +322

    I feel that an analysis of the War on Drugs and its effects on mass incarceration should have also been included in the video.

    • @davidpatton906
      @davidpatton906 8 років тому +8

      What a stupid idea! This guy is covertly liberal but you want him to be in your face liberal.

    • @louise-yo7kz
      @louise-yo7kz 5 років тому +45

      Absolutely

  • @sabrinarosario6499
    @sabrinarosario6499 7 років тому +418

    "Keep your bureaucratic hands off my thermostat" LMAO

  • @SiVlog1989
    @SiVlog1989 4 роки тому +151

    Considering how Reagan was politically in his youth, he did a complete about face. From Democratic leaning, sympathetic to Trades Union and campaigning for people like Harry Truman, to being pro-business, Anti-Union and the darling of Conservatives as Republicans think of him to this day

  • @tunclegingercunt9696
    @tunclegingercunt9696 7 років тому +1309

    "Keep your Bureaucratic hands of my thermostat" XD

  • @xdearlifex
    @xdearlifex 10 років тому +754

    John Green is living some sort of Kafka-esque nightmare. He is forced to sit in a white room while lecturing to his younger self about history while occasionally berating him. He is forced to by a mysterious figure named "Stan", who occasionally makes him answer game-show style questions where the only reward is a lack of punishment via this "shock pen". Somebody HELP HIM!

    • @Teuwntjuh
      @Teuwntjuh 10 років тому +2

      Someone must have been telling lies about John G., for without having done anything wrong he was arrested one fine morning.

    • @JLRoberson
      @JLRoberson 5 років тому +7

      please sir no more shocks
      MORE HISTORY GREEN
      uh...Mongols? AAAAAA

    • @Jjb-gk4ce
      @Jjb-gk4ce 4 роки тому

      We don't care about John Green, individuals don't matter after all

    • @prodwysp
      @prodwysp 4 роки тому

      Get your r/woooshes ready everyone

    • @abhiprakash74999
      @abhiprakash74999 4 роки тому

      Omg. Underrated comment

  • @alonalkalai9505
    @alonalkalai9505 6 років тому +1016

    Trump took Reagan's slogan.
    "Let's Make America Great Again"

    • @barneycarparts
      @barneycarparts 5 років тому +121

      Its a good goal.

    • @telescopicS627
      @telescopicS627 5 років тому +200

      And is coincidentally also a moron. History will not be kind to Boomer clowns.

    • @obiwanshinobi87
      @obiwanshinobi87 4 роки тому +132

      More like he ruined Reagan's slogan

    • @stephenb6016
      @stephenb6016 4 роки тому +116

      @@telescopicS627 why is the country doing so good then

    • @telescopicS627
      @telescopicS627 4 роки тому +110

      @@stephenb6016 *well. You mean "why is the country doing well". It's not. It's doing just as well as it was under Obama, which is mediocre. Maybe your low standards and psychotic partisanship play a role in this perception? Obsession with stock market too.

  • @justinfeller1777
    @justinfeller1777 4 роки тому +79

    8:20 Real talk though, what's up with carpeted bathrooms in the 80s???

  • @willzjc
    @willzjc 8 років тому +436

    "It's never about individuals, it's always about collective hivemind"
    thanks Comrade

  • @mustardsfire22
    @mustardsfire22 10 років тому +110

    The breakdown John has in the middle of the episode about why he wants us to learn about our history is one of the best moments of any Crash Course episode ever.

  • @thatguyoverthere468
    @thatguyoverthere468 5 років тому +948

    He completely skipped over the fact that Reagan had a great sense of humor

    • @parrotboss785
      @parrotboss785 5 років тому +63

      like trump

    • @lavaniadelrey2807
      @lavaniadelrey2807 5 років тому +25

      Parrot Boss yes, just like trump

    • @saamyar9524
      @saamyar9524 5 років тому +120

      @@lavaniadelrey2807 Much, much, greater then Trump's.

    • @shawnmoore1319
      @shawnmoore1319 5 років тому +2

      That Guy Over There the best

    • @bearcatben4762
      @bearcatben4762 5 років тому +11

      and he liked jelly beans. I have seen his portrait made in jelly beans

  • @MasterTSayge
    @MasterTSayge 5 років тому +220

    D.A.R.E.
    Drugs Are Really Expensive

  • @TheMarkusFIN
    @TheMarkusFIN 8 років тому +151

    Fun fact about trickle-down economics:
    Poverty in the US hit an all-time low (far lower than in the 50's or the 60's) in 2000, during the height of trickle-down economics when US was the most capitalist country in the world.

    • @jdoctopus9488
      @jdoctopus9488 8 років тому +69

      Fun fact about your comment bill clinton was president. With major regulations on companies.

    • @TheMarkusFIN
      @TheMarkusFIN 8 років тому +13

      ***** Well overall there was less regulation. Some areas of business might have had more and some less but overall 2000 was the peak of US economic freedom.

    • @secularmonk5176
      @secularmonk5176 8 років тому

      +Markus FIN
      Link...

    • @secularmonk5176
      @secularmonk5176 8 років тому +6

      +Markus FIN
      Oh, how interesting:
      mjperry.blogspot.com/2010/09/us-poverty-rate-1959-to-2009.html
      Johnson's War on Poverty appears responsible for most of that drop from the 50s, and the ten years after Johnson had a comparable poverty rate to the SINGLE YEAR that you are celebrating.
      The 70s run ended because of loss of working class jobs and stagflation due to the rising global economy, whereas the "prosperity" of the dotcom boom is shown clearly to be an unsustainable sugar-high.

    • @TheMarkusFIN
      @TheMarkusFIN 8 років тому +1

      Len Arends Sure, as long as you actually bother responding after I give them.
      US poverty rate:
      1.bp.blogspot.com/_otfwl2zc6Qc/TJgxEwPv7RI/AAAAAAAAObs/AU8XbvZCSdo/s1600/poverty.jpg
      US economic freedom (in this graph compared to Denmark's economic freedom):
      fee.org/media/12279/3m.png?width=100%&height=auto

  • @davidl7743
    @davidl7743 7 років тому +1613

    "A lot of reagans policy's weren't popular at the time"
    *1980 election wins 44 states and 489 electoral votes*
    *1984 election wins 49 states and 525 electoral votes*

    • @swaharmaman9410
      @swaharmaman9410 7 років тому +242

      David L a lot not all. You can still win with some policies that are not popular as long as the rest is popular? Reagan won big, really big, but that does not make all his views beling to the majority.
      Moreover, if 40% oppose a certain view does hot mean 60% is in favour of it, it means that 60% of people are in either in favor or do not care.

    • @HtineTEE
      @HtineTEE 6 років тому +146

      David L he didn’t win bc of his policies.

    • @richgrasby5294
      @richgrasby5294 6 років тому +20

      David L I was hoping somebody would point out that fact. If no one did I was going to.

    • @RyderSpearmann
      @RyderSpearmann 6 років тому +55

      @Swahara man That means the emphasis was WRONG. The statement should have been "Most of Reagan's policies were popular at the time, leading to his reelection with even more impressive numbers." Making a technically correct but WRONG statement is just partisan spin. David L. is just illuminating the biases of the presenter for us all to see.

    • @shahabkhan4278
      @shahabkhan4278 6 років тому +32

      I R A N C O N T R A

  • @briancromwell6021
    @briancromwell6021 6 років тому +11

    Thanks to everyone at crash course (especially Stan). You are helping me study for my APUSH test and my teacher taught me nothing lol.

  • @x0cx102
    @x0cx102 4 роки тому +4

    I just checked my remote learning APUSH notes my teacher provided on presidential domestic/foreign policies, and this video hit basically every major point and historical event that was in my notes. Great video!

  • @jamal2070
    @jamal2070 10 років тому +24

    I moved to the United States two years ago, and your videos are the reason I understand American politics and history!

    • @tabula_rosa
      @tabula_rosa 10 років тому

      if you're looking for a career in american politics try a lobotomy

  • @richardunderwood4158
    @richardunderwood4158 7 років тому +696

    Tax cuts are great but only if you cut spending.

    • @rishantdutt1946
      @rishantdutt1946 7 років тому +43

      Ronald Reagan did.

    • @richardunderwood4158
      @richardunderwood4158 7 років тому +144

      Rishant Dutt Not enough to balance the budget.

    • @rhettnewbern2649
      @rhettnewbern2649 7 років тому +50

      Richard Underwood you have to think the house and senate were both controlled by the democrats

    • @antonio4114
      @antonio4114 7 років тому +29

      Hopefully trump cuts spending on things like common core, and SOME military spending. I used to be for more military spending until I found out how much it adds to the debt

    • @antonio4114
      @antonio4114 7 років тому +8

      damn maybe we really do have a problem here. I heard Bill Clinton reduced the debt, what did he do? Trump should just do that

  • @mandpanda
    @mandpanda 7 років тому +68

    "Someday maybe you'll be almost interesting"
    dang he just roasted himself

    • @BradyPostma
      @BradyPostma 4 роки тому +1

      It's also a complicated logic joke. Because he is me-from-the-past's future. So he's reminding his past self that insulting his own future is still insulting himself.

  • @TheTariqibnziyad
    @TheTariqibnziyad 6 років тому +24

    "we never fix the problems we always fix the things that are fine" John Green.

  • @Dexcesss
    @Dexcesss 10 років тому +561

    It's kind of disheartening how there were zero mentions of the AIDS crisis and Reagan's total disregard of it.

  • @lars1701again
    @lars1701again 10 років тому +108

    I love how he plays down Reagan's win in 80, it toasted a sitting president, something that isn't done often

    • @lars1701again
      @lars1701again 10 років тому +7

      ***** Do you know how hard it is to beat a sitting president? its only happened twice in the last 50 or so years (ford doesn't count since he wasn't elected president) only Reagan and Clinton come to mind.

    • @diskpanic
      @diskpanic 10 років тому +8

      Marc P.
      Money says that he doesn't know how hard it is. Even Obama got reelected with numerous first term blunders, unpopular ObamaCare, and the Benghazi scandal brewing... Now that he's even less popular than "W", one wonders how he got reelected... but the Republicans ran a dead horse (Romney)... and lost.

    • @One-Crazy-Cat
      @One-Crazy-Cat 10 років тому +4

      Well I'm guessing this host was in diapers when Reagan won in 80 so his first hand knowledge here is lacking somewhat and he must draw from textbooks.

    • @diskpanic
      @diskpanic 10 років тому +6

      Jonathan R
      Yes, the video's poster, like all most post-Reagan generation don't understand what American optimism feels like. It's sad.

    • @One-Crazy-Cat
      @One-Crazy-Cat 10 років тому +1

      diskpanic yes, hopefully we know that kind of unity again some day

  • @CarBuddy10
    @CarBuddy10 6 років тому +145

    2:17 "He even carried the traditionally Democratic states of Illinois and New York"
    Illinois was actually considered to be a swing state during (and before) Reagan's time. It wasn't until Bill Clinton's 1992 election that Illinois became more consistently Democrat-leaning. California has a similar history in this regard. However, imo West Virginia might be a better example in this regard, considering it was a Democrat-leaning state during the time, and Bill Clinton's elections would be the last time it voted for a Democrat leading to today.

    • @sleeplessvirus
      @sleeplessvirus 4 роки тому +4

      Illinois went for Kennedy in 1960 in an election that was completely honest, lacking any interference

  • @Farb_dk
    @Farb_dk 6 років тому +172

    Reagan didn't cut the Medicare, Social Security, etc... Because of the congress

  • @hiwayM9
    @hiwayM9 10 років тому +51

    I am continually amazed at how pragmatic John is- this topic and course of events in most anyone's hands in this day and age would become a segue into political soapbox diatribes (I know I can't refrain)
    My most sincere respect for relaying accurate info, instilling a sliver of your opinion without digressing, and offering a balanced assessment that leaves the viewer plenty of things to ponder.
    At this point even if John did forget to be awesome, the residual compensates.

  • @TheArtunism
    @TheArtunism 8 років тому +898

    STOP STOP STOP. STOP SCROLLING DOWN. DON'T DO IT

    • @CoolieCoolster
      @CoolieCoolster 8 років тому +36

      +TheArtunism Cant.... avoid.... it..... sorry.....

    • @kelownatechkid
      @kelownatechkid 8 років тому +7

      +TheArtunism Thanks for the warning :o

    • @alexmarcoe8150
      @alexmarcoe8150 8 років тому +15

      +TheArtunism I should have listened, that hurt my brain.

    • @velvetrose610
      @velvetrose610 8 років тому +14

      +Alex Marcoe I didn't listen either.... I thought just skimming wouldn't hurt. I was WRONG!!!
      Don't do it.

    • @ariana0205
      @ariana0205 8 років тому +4

      +TheArtunism Why didn't I listen? Ugh my eyes burn

  • @generalphobia
    @generalphobia 4 роки тому +19

    The fact that John was able to talk about Supply-side economics and call it trickle-down economics with a straight face lost any possibility of me taking this video seriously

    • @alexitoussaint2777
      @alexitoussaint2777 4 роки тому +5

      finally somebody gets it

    • @Fischdosepremium
      @Fischdosepremium 4 роки тому +6

      Yeah, that was painful. Also it's not about the rich spending more, unless you call investment spending (which you don't).

  • @JunSian1001
    @JunSian1001 5 років тому +183

    Oh, stagnated wage.. It is still with us in 2019.

    • @HyperIonMake
      @HyperIonMake 4 роки тому +70

      Still waiting for those trickle-down economics to kick in.......

  • @chefkendranguyen
    @chefkendranguyen 10 років тому +64

    Good episode, John. Much appreciated.

  • @RussTaylorLegend
    @RussTaylorLegend 10 років тому +55

    I have to say that I'm really impressed with the restraint shown in this episode. It was a very even handed take on a very polarizing presidency. I'm not sure I could keep my political bias out of a discussion of this presidency.

    • @TheBespectacledN00b
      @TheBespectacledN00b 10 років тому

      Is it as polarising as Margaret Thatcher was this side of the pond?
      (To the point some people - though a lot of the Left did give them grief for it as well, to be fair - held parties celebrating her recent death).

    • @RussTaylorLegend
      @RussTaylorLegend 10 років тому +7

      Probably pretty close, and definitely for the same reasons that Thatcher was so reviled by left-leaning parties.

    • @TheBespectacledN00b
      @TheBespectacledN00b 10 років тому +1

      It's interesting though, Baroness Thatcher (she got the title after resigning as PM) might be more so because Reagan could be optimistic and "speak without condescending" (I paraphrase), whereas she couldn't.

    • @RussTaylorLegend
      @RussTaylorLegend 10 років тому +10

      You bring up a good point. In his day, I think that Reagan was fairly well liked in both parties precisely for that reason. I think that most of the criticism of Reagan era politics came afterwards, when the negative effects of "trickle down" economics began the rear their ugly head in full.

    • @TheBespectacledN00b
      @TheBespectacledN00b 10 років тому +5

      Also possibly the industrial disputes in the USA were nowhere near as vitriolic as some of the ones over here. By the sounds of it, Reagan's showdown with the controllers doesn't sound anything like as divisive as the 1984 coal miner's strike.

  • @communisttrash8590
    @communisttrash8590 4 роки тому +55

    "the government is the problem so make me incharge of the government so i will make the military bigger thus giving the government more power"

  • @devchan4316
    @devchan4316 6 років тому +29

    The only reason why I remember what "voodoo economics" is is because of Ferris Bueller's Day Off

  • @Kat22Kit
    @Kat22Kit 10 років тому +340

    Thank you for bring up the de-institutionalization of the mentally ill. This has had drastic effects that linger to this day. American's mental healthcare system is so fraught with holes many people are not getting the help they desperately need. This has led to the increase in homelessness and also violent crimes committed by people with untreated mental illness.

    • @skellymom
      @skellymom 10 років тому +46

      Sadly, add to that the growing number of veterans coming home to the US-the highest number of women vets, too who need good mental healthcare...and that makes it even more dismal.

    • @mydh122
      @mydh122 10 років тому +23

      I hope that you realize that it was an ACLU lawsuit that forced the de-institutionalization of the mentally ill. The ACLU argued that institutionalizing the mentally ill took away their rights and freedom. It was NOT a policy initiated by Reagan. John Green, conveniently, leaves out that important fact.

    • @Kat22Kit
      @Kat22Kit 10 років тому +36

      mydh122 I didn't say Reagan did anything, I was just pleased anyone has brought up the issue at all! But yes the lawsuit was the initiator. What I do know is that one hospital in my city, just kicked out its patients onto the street upon its closing. Leaving these people with nothing else but to live on the streets. There were not then nor now enough safeguards to allow the severely mentally ill a safe place to live where they would be monitored.

    • @Imhornydadcomeinside
      @Imhornydadcomeinside 10 років тому +24

      mydh122 You are correct, however being a "conservative" Reagan had no problems defunding anything with health care+poor people.

    • @GodofKillers121
      @GodofKillers121 6 років тому +1

      Imhornydadcomeinside "liberals"

  • @NanZingrone
    @NanZingrone 10 років тому +43

    I was worried how you were going to handle this era: I spent a significant amount of it arguing with my Mother on the pros and cons of Regan and his policies (she the daughter of Democrats who became a Republican when she hit voting age, and me the opposite). But it was balanced. Looking forward to next week.

    • @VS24AT
      @VS24AT 10 років тому +1

      How will he cover the current admin???
      maybe it's best not covered since the current admin is still cutting deals to line their pockets before 2016 ends and the pardon pen starts to spill ink

  • @BradyPostma
    @BradyPostma 4 роки тому +12

    I wish Republicans were still this optimistic.

  • @giorgilabadze4955
    @giorgilabadze4955 4 роки тому +4

    A spot on Gorbachev's head :)
    This guy has one of the most perfected historical humor on youtube

  • @Scixxy
    @Scixxy 10 років тому +122

    I was not a fan of Reagan when he was in office. I'll say this, though: his successors made him look a lot better.

    • @pyruvatepersonage
      @pyruvatepersonage 10 років тому +11

      I am still a fan of Reagan for that reason. Very well said!

    • @garfieldfarkle
      @garfieldfarkle 4 роки тому +34

      Clintonomics outperformed Reaganomics and balanced the budget.

    • @raghul0078
      @raghul0078 4 роки тому +11

      @@garfieldfarkle at that time US was at an arms race with USSR so spending was very high.

    • @garfieldfarkle
      @garfieldfarkle 4 роки тому +23

      @@raghul0078 If one spends more, one must FIRST have more to spend.
      During the 1980 campaign, Ronald "Dutch" Reagan promised that tax cuts would trigger an economic boom that would balance the budget, then running a $133 billion deficit, in 2 years., as well as finance an increase in the defense budget.
      It was not defense spending, but tax cuts that blew a hole in the budget, just like they did under George W. Bush and just like under Trump.
      Under Reagan's timetable, 2 years later, the budget was not balanced, but the deficit had shot up from $133 billion to $300 billion and instead of a boom, we were in the worst recession since the Great Depression.
      Then Reagan reversed course and began signing tax increases and the deficit dropped, even as defense spending rose.

    • @raghul0078
      @raghul0078 4 роки тому +1

      @@garfieldfarkle ok

  • @PatrickHogan
    @PatrickHogan 10 років тому +41

    I would love to see a Crash Course series on US Presidents. I think it would be interesting. Have an episode per president amd go over life, policies, running mates, people running against them, et cetera. I think it would help put into perspective our presidents and politics, and would really help those who will be voting for the first time in 2016 to really be able to choose the candidate that is right for them, and not just who their parents like (or dislike).
    Just a thought.

  • @WilliamSarokon
    @WilliamSarokon 4 роки тому +2

    Good show. 43 years old & I love crash course in history!!!!!

  • @thepencilwarrior4947
    @thepencilwarrior4947 7 років тому +65

    "Oh yeah, the French." Haha laughed so hard at this xD

  • @ninarakic1771
    @ninarakic1771 8 років тому +19

    John Green, you're a gem. Thanks for these videos (you as well Stan and also John from the past) they make my mornings and inspire me to learn more about the world I live in. Which is pretty great.

  • @111asel
    @111asel 8 років тому +115

    I love the way John roasts himself.

  • @thestranger5564
    @thestranger5564 4 роки тому +20

    7:58
    Remember when we wanted to stay neutral in world war 2 and FDR invited his defense cabinet to strike back at Japan because of the lives of many loss in Pearl Harbor and the defense Department was like "Uhhh we cannot." Then FDR stood up from his chair seeing the defeat in his countrymen and told them "Don't tell me it can't be done." And then had Congress declare a state of war against Japan.

  • @NequeNon
    @NequeNon 6 років тому

    Dear John Green,
    Fan here. Your condescension and assuming posturing as if pained to judge others' efforts from on high is...delightful.
    Best wishes,
    Someone other than John Green

  • @ikesteroma
    @ikesteroma 10 років тому +9

    So I halfway expected this to be a hit-job on the Gipper, and was pleasantly surprised that it wasn't. I suspect that there are a huge number of Neocons that would be utterly offended that Green wasn't slobbering in adoration over Reagan, but for myself, despite his faults, he is one of my favorite presidents.

    • @z-beeblebrox
      @z-beeblebrox 10 років тому +4

      Surprise surprise, John Green doesn't have an agenda. Although you get the impression that even pure neutrality counts as an evil liberal agenda to some people.

    • @ikesteroma
      @ikesteroma 10 років тому +4

      Eugene Conniff Nah. Everyone has an agenda, even J. Green. For sure, Green shoots left of center, but he tends to be fair, and I'm okay with that.

    • @z-beeblebrox
      @z-beeblebrox 10 років тому +5

      "agenda" implies planning, organization, and action. An explicit goal. "To make an agenda". You can't accidentally have an agenda purely due to your biases. At least not in the way I see the word. It's either intentional or it doesn't exist. Everyone has biases; not everyone has an agenda.

  • @laurenbrowning6330
    @laurenbrowning6330 9 років тому +16

    Honestly, I just watched this for a quick overview of some information for a History course... but, I have to say this was incredibly interested and entertaining. I appreciate the candid thoughts about where we were and where we are now as a country (and how it really has not changed much). Thanks for a fun and informative video! Wish you were my history teacher.

  • @SageGarlandSingerSongwriter
    @SageGarlandSingerSongwriter 6 років тому +17

    I love that their symbol in the document for relief was a toilet :P

  • @Thumbnailsquid5767
    @Thumbnailsquid5767 Рік тому +3

    I’d love to see a redo of the us history series every fifteen years .. not too far now

    • @Thumbnailsquid5767
      @Thumbnailsquid5767 Рік тому

      Or at least much closer than when I first had this thought a few years ago

  • @flagcoco69
    @flagcoco69 9 років тому +295

    7:40 THIS is why I love John Green, because, every once in a while, he'll put the shtick aside and be incredibly honest. He's absolutely right, and I wish those who ask for our votes would show a small degree of the same honesty. The 20 seconds after he bonks his head, he's saying what every thoughtful American is thinking, that he wishes our so-called leaders would stop the party rhetoric, stop the pandering, stop the posturing, and fix the problems we all know we have. Partisans point fingers and speak in mocking, accusing tones, but the truly thoughtful citizen is just driven so freaking crazy by those we put in office that we all want to bonk our heads on the table.

    • @lisameskimen9296
      @lisameskimen9296 9 років тому +3

      Flag Coco well said.

    • @rooqbranwen8305
      @rooqbranwen8305 9 років тому +20

      Flag Coco One of the big problems is, that not all of you know of the problems you have, be it out of a lack of interest or due to the mind-numbing effects of ever so slightly manipulative media. That's not a purely American problem, it's the same here in Germany, but look around you to the general populace: Most of them don't know what's going on and they don't care what's going on. The only thing they care about is who wins the next Superbowl and when Honey Boo Boo will finally marry her own dad.

    • @christoffelmiddel6663
      @christoffelmiddel6663 6 років тому

      But it is the people who are in office today that make the worse out of society...

    • @BRNRDNCK
      @BRNRDNCK 6 років тому +1

      That's a nice way of saying "Everyone else should shut up and agree with me."

  • @secretmilo
    @secretmilo 10 років тому +10

    Do a crash course on the Wilcox revolutions in a Hawaii. It was a violent and often glossed-over period in our 50th state's history that was essential for making it what it is today.

  • @neospacedout
    @neospacedout 5 років тому +41

    heck yes night before AP exam

    • @kyoyarenji9254
      @kyoyarenji9254 5 років тому +4

      Anika Jackson I felt that in my soul, I have an exam tmrw morning

  • @dylanlager7068
    @dylanlager7068 3 роки тому +18

    The French comment won me over. I’ll subscribe now.

  • @mustang6172
    @mustang6172 9 років тому +49

    I want all the kids watching to know that the carpeted bathroom was a real thing and remains a terrible idea.

    • @PumaFau
      @PumaFau 9 років тому +3

      That is just inconceivable to me. I still cant believe they existed.

    • @UniteForgetLeftRight
      @UniteForgetLeftRight 9 років тому +2

      My parents house still has TWO carpeted bathrooms

    • @jrenae75
      @jrenae75 9 років тому

      Weird thing is my grandma was such a neat freak, her carpeted bathrooms actually worked! But she was a rare breed.

    • @sassycassgames3158
      @sassycassgames3158 9 років тому +2

      mustang6172 I used to live in a single-wide trailor built in the 90's, and the bathroom in it had one of those...... and whats worse is the entire room....toilet, bath-tub, walls, and for a while... the floor, was PAAAAYNK..... I dont mean pink, I mean PAAYNK...... Its literally gave you a migraine just to look IN THE ROOM..... God, I hated it....

    • @ceilingsandfloors
      @ceilingsandfloors 9 років тому

      AttentionJunkie mine too! it's just very inconvenient.

  • @GleeChan
    @GleeChan 10 років тому +6

    Big props for talking about politics while not getting personally political.

  • @pc...430
    @pc...430 7 років тому +43

    One Question?
    Why didn't you mention anything about the mass incarceration, the war on drugs, the private prisons making money from people in prison, police enforcement profits nor the effects on the black communities
    These are many things that were really important for many people in this time.
    There is a good Documentation about the Prison system in america called "the 13th".

  • @shutupsprinkles
    @shutupsprinkles 6 років тому +16

    CARPETED BATHROOMS. I THOUGHT I WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO HAD ONE GROWING UP.

  • @TacComControl
    @TacComControl 10 років тому +27

    Reagan's push for additional testing of who he considered "High Risk" groups(Specifically homosexuals) lead to a national mindset, or at least rode on it, that AIDS was the Gay's Disease. To quote Reagan himself when it comes to his prejudice towards the GLBT community...
    "My criticism is that [the gay movement] isn’t just asking for civil rights; it’s asking for recognition and acceptance of an alternative lifestyle which I do not believe society can condone, nor can I."
    And before anyone says "Reagan wasn't a racist", let us not forget that this is the man that loudly opposed the CRA and the VRA both. He often talked about States Rights when it came to voting(And by proxy, the state's "Right" to discriminate), even though he flipflopped on the CRA later on. However, he went on to veto the Civil Rights Restoration Act(Congress overrode his veto), and attempted to veto the establishment of MLK Day as a national holiday(He only withdrew when a veto-proof majority made it clear that it was going to happen whether he liked it or not). He was unapologetic in his racism, and in his homophobia, and the world is far, far better off without him.

    • @Alverant
      @Alverant 10 років тому +12

      *****
      According to you. Reality has a different view.

    • @TheTurbofish
      @TheTurbofish 10 років тому

      Why do you suggest states rights is by proxy the right to disciminate? Are suggesting even the federal government by proxy has a right to discriminate because at one point in time there was slavery? It seems to me you associate "states rights" with the civil war(slavery) because that is what it was fought over. States rights could do a lot of good for everyone in any aggenda LBGT, legalizing weed, gun rights, health care. Why do we need big brother telling us when we can do something when we already know what and how to do it?

    • @2011e92M3
      @2011e92M3 10 років тому

      TheTurbofish Because it was historically clear and TODAY (see Republican voting restrictions enacted as we speak since the recent Supreme Court ruling) still clear that when left to certain states to decide on voting laws, they'll lean towards discriminatory practices. Do you even have the slightest clue of American history over the past 100yrs? If southern states were using discriminatory voting practices and the federal government had to step in to stop such practices how can you ask why would someone assume there's a correlation between states rights and discrimination? Maybe I'm misunderstanding you but you don't seem to properly understand the context of which these topics are based in. That's why you had the government establish Civil and voting rights because the States (mostly southern) were allowing abuse on an egregious level. Heck they didn't even allow minorities and women to vote until only several decades ago. So the government had to step in to create said rights because the states refused to do anything about discriminatory practices. So clearly this country needed a "big brother" at a time when the States refused to acknowledge all of their citizens.

  • @marcosbeni5875
    @marcosbeni5875 8 років тому +84

    This wild assumptions about conservatives bother the heck out of me.
    9:27 The "Christian right" is not equivalent to "Conservatives". The Christian right is only a subset of the Conservative set.
    9:31 No common Conservative is proposing to have women leave the workforce. Conservatives respect each woman's decision: you want to join the workforce? Fine. You want to be a stay-home mom? Fine. Supporting stay-home moms is not equivalent to being against women joining the workforce. The two positions are not mutually exclusive. When will people understand that?
    9:35 No common Conservative is against appointing women to the supreme court. Since when is that a thing attached to Conservationism?

    • @andrewkaster4033
      @andrewkaster4033 8 років тому +16

      +Marcos Beni You seem to be confusing contemporary conservatism with the conservatism of 30 years ago

    • @davidpatton906
      @davidpatton906 8 років тому +18

      +Andrew Kaster No he isn't. The crap that this liberal site says about conservatives is BS.

    • @Alex-ud6zr
      @Alex-ud6zr 8 років тому

      +Marcos Beni I literally got the same result as you on that test.
      I bet you noticed how incredibly bias that test is as well. The creators think that people like Marco Rubio and Cruz and all those republican candidates are like 9.0,9.0 on that graph. They think Obama is like a 6.0,6.0. Makes no sense to me since I'm in the lower right and I consider myself an American conservative.

    • @marcosbeni5875
      @marcosbeni5875 8 років тому

      Alex A. Yeah, I'm not entirely sure either how they come up with those assessments for certain politicians.

    • @nitsuj7491
      @nitsuj7491 8 років тому +8

      +Benedict Feser sure the black lives matter may have destroyed property (which i do not agree with, it puts a negative light on the whole movement), but you cant forget the KKK has also stabbed anti protestors and then later got released form jail with no charges. I dont see any ways that we give "special treatment" to African Americans other than affirmative action. and thats not because theyre inferior. Its because heavy oppression and segregation ended 50 to 60 years ago and it takes time for those communities to get on their feet. You really think that as soon as that stuff ended that everything would just fall into place? It goes a lot deeper than that. Systematic racism is very real and a lot of people dont notice it. There are a lot of people alive today that lived through segregation and saw it end which means that there are still a lot of people with racist and/or prejudice mentalities, whether that person is aware or not.

  • @gobul-glargz8953
    @gobul-glargz8953 5 років тому +16

    10:25 Aight, Imma let the jab at the French pass just for this once because of the RATM reference, but I'm keeping an eye on you guys

  • @rigobertogiusti3637
    @rigobertogiusti3637 4 роки тому +15

    SECTION 8. Clause 1. The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.
    When ever you say the founding fathers wouldn’t recognize our country because of welfare programs like social security etc. I just think of this part of our constitution.

  • @dangelobenjamin
    @dangelobenjamin 10 років тому +14

    I like how John Green does his shows from a liberal point of view, but makes really solid arguments for the conservatives viewpoint. He does a great job staying fairly neutral. And as always, the history lessons was great.

    • @JoeDavis
      @JoeDavis 10 років тому

      He is good at reporting the facts neutrally, but does a bad job staying neutral with anything that can be interpreted either way.

    • @lahaineaveugle
      @lahaineaveugle 10 років тому +1

      How can anyone be neutral with anything that could be interpreted?

    • @JoeDavis
      @JoeDavis 10 років тому

      Centide Aiphix you said it, "could be," not has to be. If something cannot be said neutrally he could say it both ways.

    • @lahaineaveugle
      @lahaineaveugle 10 років тому

      Joe Davis Sorry, I have difficulties to dealing with modals :p (pour french guy with bad english teachers) but you said "can be" interpreted. Is this interpretation necessarily pros or cons, our could it be, as any interpretation, more subtle? To be frank I really don't know which part of the course we are talking about...

    • @JoeDavis
      @JoeDavis 10 років тому

      Centide Aiphix As far as which part of the course we are talking about, I'm talking about the whole thing in general. For the rest of your comment, I don't know how to directly answer. Basically, as Americans, we view our history through one of two lenses, for the most part. Those lenses being conservative and liberal produce, at times, opposite conclusions. This channel purports to teach history, and does a pretty good job; but when it comes to teaching something that can be interpreted in two opposite directions, I believe it is appropriate to teach the facts and leave the interpretations to the students

  • @paladingunny4082
    @paladingunny4082 8 років тому +86

    11:22 I see that Fallout reference

    • @redcoat4348
      @redcoat4348 8 років тому +3

      +Paladin Gunny he did one in the episode before where he shows vault boy. think that's Caesar at 10:15. also i didn't catch it. i saw mad max though

    • @arcticfirst
      @arcticfirst 8 років тому

      I can't tell what the guy on the left is. I know the right is probably a raider.

    • @TheRealPentigan
      @TheRealPentigan 8 років тому +3

      +Anartik Guy on the left is wearing the iconic power armor from the covers of Fallout 1, 3 and possibly either BoS or Tactics.

    • @arcticfirst
      @arcticfirst 8 років тому

      TheRealPentigan Ahh, I kinda see it now. Thank you.

  • @JOXCY
    @JOXCY 5 років тому +21

    I didn't think this video was too biased. He brought up a lot of the positives of the Reagan administration such as their economic boom, clamping down on the out of control unions (us Brits had a similar problem that got so bad that not even bodies were being buried at one point), and his role in steering the US out of the Cold War (I wouldn't give him full credit, but I believe he was the last important figure in a long line of presidents who had worked towards realising that goal).
    I've got to say that there hasn't been a president since made of the same mettle that Reagan was. Look at the videos of his negotiations with the university lecturers during the student riots, the man was certainly a great communicator!

  • @Blalack77
    @Blalack77 4 роки тому +28

    10:19 - Where he's calling the Soviet Union "the Evil Empire".... Notice the Rage Against the Machine album at the bottom of the shelf... Also named "Evil Empire"..

    • @prodwysp
      @prodwysp 4 роки тому +1

      T H A T S T H E J O K E I D O T

  • @Goreuncle
    @Goreuncle 10 років тому +27

    Leaving the French joke aside, I liked this episode a lot.
    I would've liked to hear about Reagan's financial deregulation which led to the current financial meltdown. The point of choosing Reagan over some other REAL politician was the fact that he was a known actor, a good communicator as John said. Why? Because the agenda was already planned by others (financial powers, lobbyists, etc.), all they needed was a face/image that could sell it to the people and that was a job for a PR agent, an actor like Reagan, who could deregulate away with a smile in his face.

    • @RonaldReaganRocks1
      @RonaldReaganRocks1 10 років тому +10

      You mean the part where liberals forced banks to give mortgages to poor people? That is what caused the meltdown.

    • @scottmatthews2300
      @scottmatthews2300 10 років тому +7

      RonaldReaganRocks1 The liberals certainly have their share of the blame... Reagan started the ball rolling with the financial deregulation... He literally cut positions of the people who were supposed to keep Wall Street honest. Every president since Reagan (Bush1, Clinton, Bush2, etc.) conservative and liberal alike, have continued on this trend of deregulating wall street and getting big donations to their party from the the wall street companies who operate in the dark.

    • @creeper52enderman
      @creeper52enderman 7 років тому +2

      Scott Matthews deregulation didn't do anything to hurt the economy

  • @BramClaes
    @BramClaes 10 років тому +33

    If a politician uses the word freedom a lot, or claims to act in the name of it, that is already a red flag for me

    • @burgerboot
      @burgerboot 10 років тому +2

      So you would rather hear em talk about oppression?

  • @Alfakatt
    @Alfakatt 4 роки тому +34

    ”This wasn’t bias whatsoever”...

  • @lidlett9883
    @lidlett9883 5 років тому +9

    Having been alive and paying attention at the time your synopsis of Reagan gets a D+

  • @Vnam72
    @Vnam72 10 років тому +6

    "It's about us collectively deciding what we mean when we talk about freedom and equality."
    Explain how we collectively decide something and what happens when someone disagrees.

  • @maxdicola1
    @maxdicola1 10 років тому +6

    How are the french cowards!? We were the first people to fight for a egalitarian revolution and we work towards Liberty, equality and fraternity. However I agree that the US is really a special country because it is capable of recover from very severe crisis.

    • @metallicakixtotalass
      @metallicakixtotalass 10 років тому +2

      Seriously, the hating on the French is totally baseless and bullshit.

    • @Cucumber-ej1pm
      @Cucumber-ej1pm 10 років тому +1

      Well the American Revolution did happen several years before the French Revolution ... and also didn't lead to a tyrannical warmongering dictatorship just saying.

    • @ethanlevine1935
      @ethanlevine1935 10 років тому

      Quinn Weber We also fought to keep in place most policies of Great Britain, but under local rule.

    • @MollyGermek
      @MollyGermek 10 років тому

      Because you didn't join the Iraq war. That's literally all it is.

    • @jfridy
      @jfridy 10 років тому

      The US loves to mock the French. It's like a national hobby or something. France is seen as being weak and effeminate, since they needed allied assistance in both world wars, but then later seemed quite ungrateful to the US and British for it. Strangely their problems against the Germans in WWII and defeat in the Napoleonic Wars and the Franco Prussian War have created a strange image of the French as poor fighters, when the French have a long and brutal military tradition.
      Also France hasn't jumped into wars in the last 30 years. They focused on trying to be a world leader that wasn't going to demand obedience like the US or USSR.

  • @Kellycutie3579
    @Kellycutie3579 7 років тому +3

    at 7:50 when his glasses magically dissappear

  • @dayit6260
    @dayit6260 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks! These videos are awesome and help me in my APUSH class so much! Hopefully everyone keeps doing these videos because I know they help a lot of people understand more about American history.

  • @BrendenFP
    @BrendenFP 10 років тому +28

    I'm sad to see John labling the French "cowardly" for their distaste for war, as if it's a bad thing. They, as a nation, have been through some horrendous history, bloody and wrought with war (a lot of which their own doing *cough* Napoléon *cough*) and culminating in their country being brutally invaded by Germany on no less than three occasions.

  • @drewthur15
    @drewthur15 9 років тому +228

    We need this guy back

    • @jordanbikes2437
      @jordanbikes2437 8 років тому +34

      Because with all of this war and wealth inequality, we need a big military spender and the guy who started the great wealth inequality in the first place. Yup.

    • @10Phy
      @10Phy 8 років тому +26

      +Jordan Bikes did you not watch the video. He cut the spending once the cold war was over. Today he would not have as large of a military spending because he realizes that one is not needed one he same scale. But his economic policies would help the economy grow again. Better than trumps or Bernies plans.

    • @ilanmalkin1466
      @ilanmalkin1466 8 років тому +1

      +Le Peel Have you ever faced systemic discrimination or lived in poverty? I haven't really, but I'm pretty sure that if you asked a person struggling to feed their family or a black person who's treated like a criminal by police because of his race, they'll tell you inequality is a real issue

    • @ilanmalkin1466
      @ilanmalkin1466 8 років тому +1

      +Le Peel If person A is rich and person B is poor, isn't that inequality?

    • @10Phy
      @10Phy 8 років тому +6

      Ilan Malkin this is not the fucking 1940 when workers had no rights and were not payed.

  • @parkertighe8530
    @parkertighe8530 7 років тому +22

    a rising tide lifts all boats but most of us can't afford boats so we just drown

  • @gloomyk
    @gloomyk 5 років тому +3

    I nearly just lost it when he made that joke about Regan's friends being old. OMG! XD (ALL OF MY FRIENDS ARE ON THIS)

  • @skellymom
    @skellymom 10 років тому +7

    John, I sooo appreciated your headdesk! Yes, the US is great at fixing things that work...*sigh*...

  • @Ben.....
    @Ben..... 10 років тому +23

    Not an unfair reading of Reagan. Good episode.

  • @priscillajiron8866
    @priscillajiron8866 5 років тому

    these are great! thank you so much for producing them.

  • @keatonr776
    @keatonr776 6 років тому +8

    I've noticed that as we get into later time periods more and more of your opinion comes through, not a complaint, or even a criticism just an interesting observation.

  • @takebackkean
    @takebackkean 10 років тому +16

    the french are not cowards they just raised the tax on the rich back up to a reasonable 70%

    • @TheIrishSpectre
      @TheIrishSpectre 10 років тому +4

      And that tax increase is destroying their tax base. You can't suddenly increase rates by that much in today's world if you want to avoid driving everyone making over $1 million out. Since the Socialist government raised that tax, the amount of people leaving France has increased 500-600%, destroying their tax base.

    • @ByzantineBob96
      @ByzantineBob96 10 років тому

      then that would make them stupid cowards.

    • @takebackkean
      @takebackkean 10 років тому +4

      he is also just making up facts. ignore the trolls.

    • @TheIrishSpectre
      @TheIrishSpectre 10 років тому +2

      takebackkean I'm assuming you're referring to me. I am not making up facts. French businessmen and the wealthy elite are leaving France in droves because of the policies of the Socialists, and it is having a definite effect on the French economy and tax revenues. The rich need to pay their fair share, certainly, but when there are nations right next door that don't tax their millionaires to 75% of their income, the cost of migration is far less than the cost of paying the damned tax, aiding the exodus.

    • @lahaineaveugle
      @lahaineaveugle 10 років тому +2

      TheIrishSpectre All this is nonsense. On witch analysis do you claim this?
      As a french, well aware about what's going on in my country, I can tell you that our tax base is not the problem but only that fact that most wealthiest people aren't paying enough because we don't have the same laws for the french citizen that live outside the country as you USA does. In France, you pay your taxes in the country you live in. So most of the rich guys prefer live in Switzerland, Monaco or Belgium so that they can't be legally taxed on their income made in France! And it cost around 35 billons euros a year to the french state!

  • @Mobius14
    @Mobius14 10 років тому +27

    "Greed is Good" is a misquote, John. He actually said "The point is, ladies and gentlemen, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good".

    • @3lapsed
      @3lapsed 10 років тому +7

      Diana Peña the more quotes are misquoted the further it can get from it's core truth. This misquote the same fact is conveyed however if someone, somehow, manages to misquote that then we may change the meaning entirely.

  • @nolanmartin3573
    @nolanmartin3573 7 років тому +741

    I guess Hillary was just as unelectable as Jimmy Carter.

    • @zionnuby842
      @zionnuby842 5 років тому +70

      When you realize that Hillary has never lost the popular vote in her life but Reagan lost twice in his life, and that Hillary won more votes then he did

    • @leokennedy7624
      @leokennedy7624 5 років тому

      Jack Bat How did it damage his reputation? Was the crisis his fault? Did he start it?

    • @squamish4244
      @squamish4244 5 років тому +18

      No, but like many presidents who have bad stuff happen that they have no control of, he was blamed anyway.
      And he got blamed mostly for how long it took to end, although it was a very tough situation and he did eventually negotiate an end to it.

    • @maddoxbellrose7679
      @maddoxbellrose7679 5 років тому +8

      @@zionnuby842
      That was an awkward "when you realize..."

    • @garlicbrad7916
      @garlicbrad7916 5 років тому +2

      @@leokennedy7624 I mean, after the shah died in America, Khomeini literally said he would only release the hostages when Carter was no longer president. Soooo...

  • @lizroote6076
    @lizroote6076 6 років тому +1

    love John from the Past's Holden shirt!!

  • @ThreeDigitIQ
    @ThreeDigitIQ 10 років тому +11

    7:30 is the most candid moment ever to not get cut from the final production in all of CrashCourse video history ua-cam.com/video/2h4DkpFP_aw/v-deo.htmlm30s

  • @temporalTechnologist
    @temporalTechnologist 10 років тому +17

    There is so much Ron Paul happening in the comments, holy crap.

  • @ClaytonBridges
    @ClaytonBridges 7 років тому +2

    I agree with what you were saying about being cowardly. I totally understand your point. its painful sometimes

  • @vivianlee861
    @vivianlee861 5 років тому +7

    It’s 11 right now and I still haven’t finished studying for APUSH which is tomorrow

  • @89Ayten
    @89Ayten 10 років тому +28

    You don't build a house from the roof down. Silly trickle down economics.

  • @rrni2343
    @rrni2343 8 років тому +174

    Earth - Mostly Harmless.
    John Green - Almost interesting.

    • @rrni2343
      @rrni2343 8 років тому +3

      ***** It's a Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy reference, I was reminded of that particular bit when John Green said 'I'm glad to be almost interesting me from the past. Someday maybe you'll be almost interesting'. And than imagined how that would look like if you had to condense any noteworthy thing in the galaxy into one or two words.

  • @2Turnt2Handle
    @2Turnt2Handle 4 роки тому +2

    This is a great video dude!

  • @lumo_exe
    @lumo_exe 6 років тому +9

    "Military briefing, Yavin IV, 1984" ok john green i see you