Bradley Sowers What everyone gets wrong is that there were two 90s. The early nineties with its comprehensible Rap songs, and the late nineties which was just like the 2000s but with a booming economy.
You do a good thing John. I'm a 35 year old railroad worker that wants to know the real history of this great country of ours and to have a better understanding of the world my two girls grow up in. Knowing the past makes the present alot less scary(most of the time) and gives me some optimism for our nation and the human race as a whole. Thank you sir.
Not to hate on China or India, but I think outsourcing American jobs is one of leading contributors to the death of the American middle class. Wonder why Detroit is dying? That's why.
I think you should blame globalization for that. Without it, outsourcing would not have happened. It could be argued though, that without globalization, we would not have what we have today.
Carl Ewen-Lewis People are ultimately wealthier and faster developing. More people in the world have cars, cell phones and food on the table. Globalization, coupled with the destruction of stupid trade barriers, makes americans richer. Especially consumers who now have cheaper food and clothing.
I think the American problem is it's relationship with unions. In Sweden collective bargaining is a right, and the unions are working together with the corporations to find ways to work smarter in order to compete with low wage nations.
MaskinJunior But then again, Sweden isan third world , rank 33rd in the enoconmy Sweden vs Usa no match cos us #1 but then Agian Sweden is only 27th. that is why si i dont belive in trad unons i
Matthew Smit It's not terrible compared to a lot of other countries, but we still have many things we are lagging behind in that the rest of the world has figured out, like healthcare. The average quality of life is still relatively high, as far as the world goes.
remix central and if you were poor as hell, that would have been impossible to do... Universal healthcare is meant to benefit the poor/unable to travel more than the rich
Stan probably bought a squaremile of it when they started these videos and hasn't yet run out ;) It's always a procurement fubar when such inexplicable things happen :D
*quick note: It is very easy to make millions of dollars in the oil industry if your father, and his father before him, and going all the way back to the 1600s were all rich. The Bushes are the oldest of "old money"...
DW42536387384 What is wrong with being rich and wanting to stay rich? No where in the law does it state "If you were successful its your job to give away money"
My greatest take away from this was that no matter what decisions a government makes, it will always displease someone in the favor of another and we will always wonder what if...
What will I do without this channel when you get to the present? I hope you have plans to go back through history again talking about different evens from different angles.
royms2000 Wars don’t actually cost much when you consider the size of the budget even during peace. Liberals just like to point out the military spending as a reason for not spending on their own stupid pet projects.
In 1992 I was 18 and I thought that G. Bush Sr. was one of the worst presidents we had ever had. This seemed to be reinforced by the comparatively improved 90s. Little did we know just how bad things would get under his spawn. Bad enough that Bush Sr. would publicly criticize his own son years later.
DarkChocolate33 Clinton created most of today’s problem: NAFTA, China, the Housing Crisis. Hell, he’s the one that decided Bin Laden was not a threat. Bush Jr tried to fix these things but 9/11 happened and everything went haywire. Obama kissed the Muslims’ collective arses. And now Trump is fixing everything at record pace.
+Matthew LMAO. When BIll Clinton was bombing terrorist training camps in the 90s Conservative radio hosts were saying he's only doing that because wanted us to get distracted from his affairs. Meanwhile Bush Jr. was uninterested with Bin Laden literally weeks before 9/11.
HW Bush was really a solid president, he handled the end of the Cold War brilliantly, the gulf war well, and when he thought it was necessary for the good of the nation he raised taxes. He seemed very pragmatic and competent. I would argue he was one of the better presidents of the 20th century, its too bad his son fell pretty far from the tree.
***** No he wasn't…he masterminded Iran Contra and the October Surprise (ex-CIA Chief, he already had the pieces in place) He deceptively goaded Iraq into invading Kuwait in order to play the hero..the weeping Kuwaiti Ambassador's daughter was complete charade.
***** First of all Iran Contra has nothing to do with his presidency... at all. Second, if you think he goaded Saddam into invading you obviously haven't studied the conflict in much detail. The US warned Iraq numerous times not to do it, yet Iraq did it anyway. Saddam thought the US was just putting up a show of protects and he gambled. He miscalculated, that's not Bush's issue, the administration was very clear Iraq shouldn't invade.
Bullshit! Iran Contra could not have succeeded with him, you clearly haven been in the military, you too gullible and in love with this dude, your post drips with it. He never gave a clean accounting…only another Bushism (I wasn't in the loop.. and we all make mistakes - not Iraq sized mistakes we don't). My god, you must believe everything you read on the cereal boxes! Iraq thought no such thing..it got a clear green light from Bush to do..google up Ambassador to Iraq, April Gillespie - educate yourself. Start by learning how to employ 'critical thinking'
George H. W. Bush is seriously one of our most underrated presidents. His domestic policy lacked vision, but he knew foreign policy and handled the situation well.
For some reason, this show has really helped in keeping me from unaliving myself. Maybe because it’s funny and history is cool. Maybe it’s because John Green is cool. Anyways, thanks everyone at CrashCourse.
You forgot to mention the other iconic political moment: where Senator Benson said to Dan Quayle "I knew John Kennedy, I served under John Krnnedy. You sir are no John Kennedy".
Those 99 other jobs declines Raoul because they knew he was destined for more - They knew that he had to be the one to guide John Green 'from the past' down the line of the historian so that they could make crash course. And yet they couldn't tell Raoul about the future - Time travelers and historians don't get along !
DW42536387384 I like how the guy with 2 letters and a shit load of random numbers for a name keeps calling the USA the "American Empire". Do you even know what an Empire is? The way you keep saying it makes me think otherwise. An empire is when a country takes over other countries and keeps it under one name.
Because they don't take nations by force, they take them by cash and other invisible methods by making them submit under one power, who rules the universe, which is entirely false. No nation will ever be the one to match of God and Christ.
I believe because in the Ten Commandments, no one, even a nation can never become God and what the American Empire says, "one nation under god", is truly foul and disgusted.
America's worst nightmare: the common enemy disappears over night. All those new weapons and defense budgets and military ventures in countries people couldn't pronounce nor locate on a map were suddenly useless. How do you justify spending billions, if not trillions of dollars to fight an enemy who isn't there anymore? That's like me taking out a loan to buy smartmines to fend off the Sasquatch in my yard. Pointless. But American politicians learned: Never again shall our enemy just disappear! Now we have the endless war on terror, which is basically the USA fighting the people they (namely the CIA) recruited and trained back in the 70's and 80's. And since they're elusive you can never say that they're defeated.
Good video, but I was hoping this would be a little more about the end of the Cold War. Btw, it is ridiculously stupid that we have a voting system that allows vote splitting. At least someone in Oregon is trying to do something in that state. There is a petition for an initiative that would make all candidates to run in one primary and voters would be allowed to vote for any number of candidates that they approve. The top two candidates with the most approval would face off in the general election. This is a great idea; not only will it stop vote splitting, it will drastically reduce partisanship and force candidates to go to the REAL center (not Washington center).
I always remember this interview, which I will give the quotes from on the Dick Chaney article on Wikipedia. In an April 15, 1994 interview with C-SPAN, Cheney was asked if the U.S. and UN forces should have moved into Baghdad. Cheney replied that occupying and attempting to take over the country would have been a "bad idea" and would have led to a "quagmire", explaining that: "Because if we'd gone to Baghdad we would have been all alone. There wouldn't have been anybody else with us. There would have been a U.S. occupation of Iraq. None of the Arab forces that were willing to fight with us in Kuwait were willing to invade Iraq. Once you got to Iraq and took it over, took down Saddam Hussein's government, then what are you going to put in its place? That's a very volatile part of the world, and if you take down the central government of Iraq, you could very easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq fly off: part of it, the Syrians would like to have to the west, part of it - eastern Iraq - the Iranians would like to claim, they fought over it for eight years. In the north you've got the Kurds, and if the Kurds spin loose and join with the Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey. It's a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq. The other thing was casualties. Everyone was impressed with the fact we were able to do our job with as few casualties as we had. But for the 146 Americans killed in action, and for their families - it wasn't a cheap war. And the question for the president, in terms of whether or not we went on to Baghdad, took additional casualties in an effort to get Saddam Hussein, was how many additional dead Americans is Saddam worth? Our judgment was, not very many, and I think we got it right.[54][55]" Cheney regarded the Gulf War as an example of the kind of regional problem the United States was likely to continue to face in the future.[56] "We're always going to have to be involved [in the Middle East]. Maybe it's part of our national character, you know we like to have these problems nice and neatly wrapped up, put a ribbon around it. You deploy a force, you win the war and the problem goes away. But it doesn't work that way in the Middle East. It never has, and isn't likely to in my lifetime." I wonder what happened to this guy between his days as Secretary or Defense and his time as Vice President.
And Uncle Sam defeats Soviet Bowser in a way that 6-year-old Me from the Past tried tons of times over years of playing Super Mario Advance 2 without realizing that it wasn't the right way to beat him.
John is pretty harsh on Bush's foreign policy. However, especially relative to the next 16 years, it was pretty good. He managed to not do dumb things in a big way (like antagonize Russia at its most vulnerable). I suppose he could have acted more decisively in Yugo - but so could have like, ya know, Europe. Sending troops on an aid mission to Somalia - mixed. Again, the biggest accomplishment was managing the Russian crisis.
This was VERY generous to HW. No mention of his extraordinarily imperialistic policies in Latin America. He did terrible things to Panama and Columbia in our name.
***** he meant only ancient history they are doing US history and they did world history so it would make just as much sense to do a ancient history only
Hey! I just want to say how much I love this UA-cam channel! I honestly do love this UA-cam channel, it’s helped me a lot with history class. Even though I’m homeschooled, My Aunt will add one (or a few) of your videos to her History playlist. And let me say this, y’all are Hilarious! Me and my cousin both love y’alls channel! We both just love the humor! So, thank you so much for teaching me, my cousins, and my little sister so many things that I didn’t know about history! I really do appreciate the effort being put into these videos! Thank y’all 💙😁
As a moderate who was born 6 years after the 1992 election. George H.W Bush was pretty smart and pragmatic President. He would be unelectable today with republicans calling him the evil establishment because he had experience and was moderate and liberals would vilify him for being born rich as that somehow stops him from being sympathetic to the poor. We need another one like him!
He raised taxes, expanded health care, increased environmental regulation, negotiated peace deals, and made peace with Russia. All these things would make him a villain in today's Republican Party.
I long for the days of the Cold War. The unguided approach to foreign policy is horrendous at best. The nuclear hair-trigger was the only bad part, but that still exists. Back then, we could not take idiots (Mrss. I can see Russia from my house), or the indecisive (Mitt Romney, Harry Reed) seriously. Dead lock was not an option. Space exploration was a valuable asset. The reasons go on, and on... We need another one.
Maybe China, or a resurgent Russia will provide it(That is if Russia, or Putin really, can somehow solve their population crisis). Though I think it's possible to be prosperous and competent without a rival.
I think a United Europe could fill the role too, Like the Victorian Era? A Scramble for Mars maybe? But that might just spark WWIII. I think some sort of conflict will be inevitable. Living in peace is just in not human nature.
Dick (Cheney) was actually born on the 30th of January, and not on the 23rd. I'm thinking it was the thought bubble's fault and not really yours. I have learned so much from your series. I was born in Titoslavia in the 80s and your take on the Balkans in the 90s was spot on. You make history informative and a lot of fun.
That would either be a colossal undertaking (compared to the US, Europe isn't seen as united in the same way and the documented history is extensively larger) or too broad and inevitably skim across the surface - resulting in reductive explanations. Unless they were to parcel them up akin to the World History series, but why not then just return to said series.
straitJacketFashion well, Europe is not a country, hence you can't have the same approach as with the US history. But he did pretty good job on the world history, so I was thinking that maybe a similar angle would work. I have faith in mr. Green.
I guess it looks like the final episode is going to talk about 9/11 and GWB's presidency. I have a feeling hes going to not only criticize the security acts passed post-911 like The Patriot Act but hes going to get a huge backlash no matter what stance Green takes.
The Iran/Iraq war The Gulf War The Iraq War BTW Iraq invasion of Kawai happen the after the State Department said that it would get involve in a boarder depute between to. 2 hours tanks rolled
Alberto Vasquez at the time, the Iran/Iraq war was refered to in the news as "the gulf war". It was all over the TV when I was a kid. However, it is probably the same as referring to World War I as the Great War back when it was happening and during the 20s and 30s.
It appears that John can't keep his personal political bias out of these videos. It would serve us better if he just sticked to the facts instead of hinting through obvious insinuations that he's a liberal, a fact we already know and doesn't add anything of value to what he's supposed to be explaining.
Can we infer he's liberal from his enunciations, yeah, but what he's been saying in the video is hardly biased. If you were looking for bias, you could do a hell of a lot worse.
+BucketheadChuck You say that like being liberal is by definition a bad thing, and that pisses me off, like it would annoy you if I went around acting like being whatever you are is by definition a bad thing.
I'll never forget this. I was just out of HS when the gulf war started. I'LL NEVER FORGET my best friends dad (Vietnam vet) advised us to enlist BEFORE we got drafted so you get a kinda sorta choice on your assignment. We decided to be in tanks figuring (naively) that snipers can't get us easily therefor increasing our chances to survive. But I remember feeling and saying to everyone EXACTLY the same thing Mr. Green says in the mystery document: "If we haveto go, we haveto go. But it would be a shame."
If my experience watching anime has taught me anything, it's that now we can expect a filler arc to pad out some time for the source material to get ahead.
***** I was thinking not of a single "episode" on africa but a series which attempts to discuss as many regions and peoples as possible throughout time. Also I think crash course is meant more just to educate people in general.. the fact kids aren't taught about africa at all is outrageous.. African civilizations have thrived and been quite culturally rich and complex compared to modern mainstream conceptions of africa as being just another wild place.
Honestly, I think liberals tend to be more of the younger generation, while conservatives tend to be older. At least economically, younger people want more equal economic rights and equality with the older richer people. The reason conservatives are older is because they want to keep their money.
John ( as well as everyone behind the scenes) thanks for giving a fair and level headed assessment of a presidency that most people feel is a foot note in our history.
Hey, good job making a video that was truly moderate. It's so common for people to go into all out bashing mode or all out defense mode when discussing anything conservative or republican. It's refreshing to hear someone say, "there were things they did wrong AND things they did well". Imagine that, a somewhat unbiased point of view.
usually well informed, but what is missing here is why did America turn on Saddam Hussien? Why was he an ally right through the 80's while he committed human rights violations only to be invaded by America when he invaded Kuwait? Why does America engage intervene in foreign affairs, to promote democracy and peace and protect innocent lives or to secure foreign resources, usually oil? These are the questions this channel and everybody else needs to ask more often
They Didnt innvade Iraq during the gulf war in kuwait. Iraq was innvaded in 2003 due to false accusations of having weapons of mass destruction, however an US promoted uprising DID happend right after the gulf war cease fire aggreement in southern Iraq
Gabriel McGuoirk True. He didn't say that the date of the incident happened while Pres. Bush was in office. However, he was pointing out the fact that it was Bush who ordered the US Military to get into the situation. This happened in 1992, while Bush was president. I believe it was called Operation Hope or something like that.
My god...Raoul Meyer is just John Green REGENERATED. Older John Green accidentally went back in time and picked up his past self. This whole show is done in a TARDIS because that's the only place that will support the obvious paradox of two John Greens. And the show is done before older John Green regenerates into Raoul Meyer, who gets stuck in the past because his TARDIS blew up. AND STAN AND THE CREW ARE HIS COMPANIONS who are pretending to be shooting a show to lessen the paradox. And the shock pen is a way to jumpstart John's regeneration before he exists the TARDIS with his past self, creating a paradox in the universe that can't be contained by the TARDIS.
Saddam was evil, this is true. But what is it you moderns have against good ol'fashioned conquest? I was never an aggressive expander, albeit I shrunk the empire, but I still do not understand your abhorrence with expansion....
We have moral convictions against doing such, these days. Opportunistic war in general, not just expansionist war, is heavily frowned upon. This is so for many reasons, but is largely because modern war with modern weapons is incredibly bloody, and should be an absolute last resort when all other avenues of diplomacy have been exhausted. Also, democracy had a bit of a revival since your time. Most people around the world live in countries with at least *some* degree of democracy. So the prevailing mood in the world is: The people deserve to rule themselves. Expansionist war violates this principle. There's an entire laundry list of reasons, really, why us 'moderns' have misgivings about conquest. If you have regular access to the internet, I suggest continuing what you're doing right now, and watch more history videos. :) It will go far in explaining the answer to your question.
spanishgame Let me shorten your essay to one sentence: After conquering the Spanish Empire, annexing its shithole colonies (Puerto Rico and the Philippines) and attempting to integrate its people, the US learned that economic conquest is better than military conquest.
I can't. I read the immigration policies. Apparently they don't accept immigrants with bad credit because no one wants to take in someone running from debt. You got lucky this time, Canada, us 'muricans are stuck for now. (lbr, at least half of us here are in debt up to our ears THANKS COLLEGE AND MEDICAL BILLS)
BAssCaveMan Not quite, cutie pie. America (technically the United States of America) is a country. NORTH America (and SOUTH America) is a continent. So Canada is North American, but not American. It may not seem a big distinction, but if American described continental regions instead of just a country, Brazil or Argentina would be American, and they clearly are not. The North and South prefixes are important. I'm fun at parties, yadda yadda.
ALLIED7621 Lincoln was republican, which back in 1860's, meant he was liberal. Regan sold guns to contra's in Iran. Carson compared Obama Care to slavery. Rand Paul has said he would be happy if the UN was dissolved. Name more please.
ALLIED7621 I don't believe I was using an ad hominem, all my facts were relivant to the augment. I can accept other people's opinions. I cannot accept people with ignorant opinions.
ALLIED7621 No, I used their actions. To judge wether or not they were good people. I never said that Reagan was a bad man because he was a conservative. But rather I said he was a bad man because he sold guns to Iran.
ALLIED7621 No thats not at all what I was saying. I was saying that Reagan is a bad person because of his actions. The definition of ad hominem is "Directed against the person rather than the position". I was saying he can't be a good man because he sold guns to Sadam Hussain. Which a very bad thing to do. Regardless of who they are.
"The 1990s began in 1988..."
-John Green
Many historians say the 90s began in 1989 with the fall of the Berlin Wall
Bradley Sowers
What everyone gets wrong is that there were two 90s. The early nineties with its comprehensible Rap songs, and the late nineties which was just like the 2000s but with a booming economy.
And ended in 2008.
Do you have the time
To listen to me whine
About nothing and everything
all at once!
I'm in 2019
"The guy had more careers than Barbie!!" Laughed out loud at work.
You do a good thing John. I'm a 35 year old railroad worker that wants to know the real history of this great country of ours and to have a better understanding of the world my two girls grow up in.
Knowing the past makes the present alot less scary(most of the time) and gives me some optimism for our nation and the human race as a whole.
Thank you sir.
Not to hate on China or India, but I think outsourcing American jobs is one of leading contributors to the death of the American middle class. Wonder why Detroit is dying? That's why.
I think you should blame globalization for that. Without it, outsourcing would not have happened. It could be argued though, that without globalization, we would not have what we have today.
Carl Ewen-Lewis People are ultimately wealthier and faster developing. More people in the world have cars, cell phones and food on the table. Globalization, coupled with the destruction of stupid trade barriers, makes americans richer. Especially consumers who now have cheaper food and clothing.
I am not arguing that, I am simply stating that outsourcing is a by-product of globalization.
I think the American problem is it's relationship with unions. In Sweden collective bargaining is a right, and the unions are working together with the corporations to find ways to work smarter in order to compete with low wage nations.
MaskinJunior But then again, Sweden isan third world , rank 33rd in the enoconmy Sweden vs Usa no match cos us #1 but then Agian Sweden is only 27th. that is why si i dont belive in trad unons i
damn Bush had a impressive career props for the finishing his mission in a burning plane thing that's hardcore
The US doesn't have paid maternity leave? Wow, that is so......retro.
Matthew Smit It's not terrible compared to a lot of other countries, but we still have many things we are lagging behind in that the rest of the world has figured out, like healthcare. The average quality of life is still relatively high, as far as the world goes.
Depends on the employer, as it is not required.
Imagine how it'll be with our current dictator,
remix central and if you were poor as hell, that would have been impossible to do... Universal healthcare is meant to benefit the poor/unable to travel more than the rich
Well thats one way to put it.
Why is the mystery document still ancient parchment?
+R3df0x123 OooooOOOoooo! Spooky!
Stan probably bought a squaremile of it when they started these videos and hasn't yet run out ;) It's always a procurement fubar when such inexplicable things happen :D
*quick note: It is very easy to make millions of dollars in the oil industry if your father, and his father before him, and going all the way back to the 1600s were all rich. The Bushes are the oldest of "old money"...
his career is still impressive
DW42536387384 What is wrong with being rich and wanting to stay rich? No where in the law does it state "If you were successful its your job to give away money"
The problem these days is that they are eroding the wealth of everybody who is not incredibly rich in order to build their own wealth.
Diana Peña 50 lifetimes? Actually, for the richest, that is a gross underestimation. That would be their weekly income.
DW42536387384 except that America's infrastructure is not collapsing.. what? It is? Well surely it is not bogged down in Afghanistan... wait...
He was a better president then his son
like that's hard
+Alex Pindell Please clap
+Alex Pindell *than
+Alex Pindell Yeah, but is that really saying much? I mean, that's a pretty low bar to set.
***** I really hope you're joking...
"More careers than Barbie" :)
Who here in 2018
RIP H.W bush😔
That's rude ^^^
@@novusregnum Which one?
@@augustus331 smh😒 okay
I appreciate the respect you have paid to our former Potus.
I’m here in 2019
That Soviet Bowser looked fucking awesome good job Thought Bubble (or Thought Cafe).
My greatest take away from this was that no matter what decisions a government makes, it will always displease someone in the favor of another and we will always wonder what if...
That Super Mario World-inspired thought bubble with Bowser was so great I went back and watched it twice.
It also terrified me a little. Sorry, that's a lie, a lot.
0:48 He's the Hulk? Thanks I know what my history project is about now :)
Remember now. You have grown into 373k subs
What will I do without this channel when you get to the present? I hope you have plans to go back through history again talking about different evens from different angles.
I just hope they do World History next.
Yes its quite awesome, especially, you guessed it, The Mongols.
They can make country specific video history like US history. How about German history, or Indonesia History maybe!
This is Merika! We're the only nation worth lernin about
anubis2814 Europe History would be nice.
We're Americans: We're fine with going to war, but don't you dare make us actually pay for them!!
royms2000
Wars don’t actually cost much when you consider the size of the budget even during peace. Liberals just like to point out the military spending as a reason for not spending on their own stupid pet projects.
"who never inhaled marijuana and didn't cheat on his wife except for some times"
I'm dead 😂
In 1992 I was 18 and I thought that G. Bush Sr. was one of the worst presidents we had ever had. This seemed to be reinforced by the comparatively improved 90s. Little did we know just how bad things would get under his spawn. Bad enough that Bush Sr. would publicly criticize his own son years later.
You think Bill clinton was worse? How about Obama and so far Trump?
DarkChocolate33
Clinton created most of today’s problem: NAFTA, China, the Housing Crisis. Hell, he’s the one that decided Bin Laden was not a threat.
Bush Jr tried to fix these things but 9/11 happened and everything went haywire.
Obama kissed the Muslims’ collective arses.
And now Trump is fixing everything at record pace.
+Matthew LMAO. When BIll Clinton was bombing terrorist training camps in the 90s Conservative radio hosts were saying he's only doing that because wanted us to get distracted from his affairs. Meanwhile Bush Jr. was uninterested with Bin Laden literally weeks before 9/11.
Ah we get to the world wide web soon.
That glorious European innovation that changed the world..... ;)
HW Bush was really a solid president, he handled the end of the Cold War brilliantly, the gulf war well, and when he thought it was necessary for the good of the nation he raised taxes. He seemed very pragmatic and competent. I would argue he was one of the better presidents of the 20th century, its too bad his son fell pretty far from the tree.
***** It is too bad Bush Sr was blamed for the recession.
***** No he wasn't…he masterminded Iran Contra and the October Surprise (ex-CIA Chief, he already had the pieces in place)
He deceptively goaded Iraq into invading Kuwait in order to play the hero..the weeping Kuwaiti Ambassador's daughter was complete charade.
***** First of all Iran Contra has nothing to do with his presidency... at all.
Second, if you think he goaded Saddam into invading you obviously haven't studied the conflict in much detail. The US warned Iraq numerous times not to do it, yet Iraq did it anyway. Saddam thought the US was just putting up a show of protects and he gambled. He miscalculated, that's not Bush's issue, the administration was very clear Iraq shouldn't invade.
Bullshit! Iran Contra could not have succeeded with him, you clearly haven been in the military, you too gullible and in love with this dude, your post drips with it. He never gave a clean accounting…only another Bushism (I wasn't in the loop.. and we all make mistakes - not Iraq sized mistakes we don't).
My god, you must believe everything you read on the cereal boxes! Iraq thought no such thing..it got a clear green light from Bush to do..google up Ambassador to Iraq, April Gillespie - educate yourself. Start by learning how to employ 'critical thinking'
***** every president in american history is a lying, murdering, stealing tyrant. and each and every single one of them belongs in prison.
George H. W. Bush is seriously one of our most underrated presidents. His domestic policy lacked vision, but he knew foreign policy and handled the situation well.
For some reason, this show has really helped in keeping me from unaliving myself. Maybe because it’s funny and history is cool. Maybe it’s because John Green is cool. Anyways, thanks everyone at CrashCourse.
we're happy you're here!
You forgot to mention the other iconic political moment: where Senator Benson said to Dan Quayle "I knew John Kennedy, I served under John Krnnedy. You sir are no John Kennedy".
Whoa, CNN was actually competent and relevant once upon a time?
Those 99 other jobs declines Raoul because they knew he was destined for more - They knew that he had to be the one to guide John Green 'from the past' down the line of the historian so that they could make crash course.
And yet they couldn't tell Raoul about the future - Time travelers and historians don't get along !
Unemployment is a major issue in the American Empire.
DW42536387384
I like how the guy with 2 letters and a shit load of random numbers for a name keeps calling the USA the "American Empire". Do you even know what an Empire is? The way you keep saying it makes me think otherwise. An empire is when a country takes over other countries and keeps it under one name.
Because they don't take nations by force, they take them by cash and other invisible methods by making them submit under one power, who rules the universe, which is entirely false. No nation will ever be the one to match of God and Christ.
Well when it comes to fantasy, no nation will ever be able to match God and Christ.
I believe because in the Ten Commandments, no one, even a nation can never become God and what the American Empire says, "one nation under god", is truly foul and disgusted.
I find it funny how you can learn more things watching 14 minutes of Crash Course than sitting in a classroom for 7 hours.
hamilton0919
But will you retain it?
Good one, John. :)
*****
America's worst nightmare: the common enemy disappears over night. All those new weapons and defense budgets and military ventures in countries people couldn't pronounce nor locate on a map were suddenly useless. How do you justify spending billions, if not trillions of dollars to fight an enemy who isn't there anymore? That's like me taking out a loan to buy smartmines to fend off the Sasquatch in my yard. Pointless.
But American politicians learned: Never again shall our enemy just disappear! Now we have the endless war on terror, which is basically the USA fighting the people they (namely the CIA) recruited and trained back in the 70's and 80's. And since they're elusive you can never say that they're defeated.
and if it looks like they're about defeated you simply stage another 9/11....again
Well there's also China
You forget that a whole lot of our military budget goes to protecting other nations
Good video, but I was hoping this would be a little more about the end of the Cold War.
Btw, it is ridiculously stupid that we have a voting system that allows vote splitting. At least someone in Oregon is trying to do something in that state. There is a petition for an initiative that would make all candidates to run in one primary and voters would be allowed to vote for any number of candidates that they approve. The top two candidates with the most approval would face off in the general election. This is a great idea; not only will it stop vote splitting, it will drastically reduce partisanship and force candidates to go to the REAL center (not Washington center).
It's weird to think things that have happened in my lifetime are considered history. I'm only 22.
Deano
Time be a harsh mistress laddie
Now you're 27, but I'm still 22.
@@DiaJasin Now your 23 but I am still 22
@@raghul0078 idk about you, but I'm feelin' 22!
I always remember this interview, which I will give the quotes from on the Dick Chaney article on Wikipedia.
In an April 15, 1994 interview with C-SPAN, Cheney was asked if the U.S. and UN forces should have moved into Baghdad. Cheney replied that occupying and attempting to take over the country would have been a "bad idea" and would have led to a "quagmire", explaining that:
"Because if we'd gone to Baghdad we would have been all alone. There wouldn't have been anybody else with us. There would have been a U.S. occupation of Iraq. None of the Arab forces that were willing to fight with us in Kuwait were willing to invade Iraq. Once you got to Iraq and took it over, took down Saddam Hussein's government, then what are you going to put in its place? That's a very volatile part of the world, and if you take down the central government of Iraq, you could very easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq fly off: part of it, the Syrians would like to have to the west, part of it - eastern Iraq - the Iranians would like to claim, they fought over it for eight years. In the north you've got the Kurds, and if the Kurds spin loose and join with the Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey. It's a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq. The other thing was casualties. Everyone was impressed with the fact we were able to do our job with as few casualties as we had. But for the 146 Americans killed in action, and for their families - it wasn't a cheap war. And the question for the president, in terms of whether or not we went on to Baghdad, took additional casualties in an effort to get Saddam Hussein, was how many additional dead Americans is Saddam worth? Our judgment was, not very many, and I think we got it right.[54][55]"
Cheney regarded the Gulf War as an example of the kind of regional problem the United States was likely to continue to face in the future.[56]
"We're always going to have to be involved [in the Middle East]. Maybe it's part of our national character, you know we like to have these problems nice and neatly wrapped up, put a ribbon around it. You deploy a force, you win the war and the problem goes away. But it doesn't work that way in the Middle East. It never has, and isn't likely to in my lifetime."
I wonder what happened to this guy between his days as Secretary or Defense and his time as Vice President.
You didn't mention him throwing up on the Japanese Prime Minister! It was the highlight of his presidency! WTF?!
Hello me from first grade, this is what happened back then.
Texas had democrats before the democratic party went south. haha. It sounded funnier in my head.
5:37 two sevens on the calender
"Technically, we'll never get to the present, because we're always in the past."
Thank you for ruining my perception of reality!
I can listen to John talk for hours. lol those last to memes in the mystery document
That is literally Soviet Bowser in a hammer and sickle Koopa Clown Car on the Thought Bubble screen.
And Uncle Sam defeats Soviet Bowser in a way that 6-year-old Me from the Past tried tons of times over years of playing Super Mario Advance 2 without realizing that it wasn't the right way to beat him.
+Prolet Kult I know exactly what it means. I used it unnecessarily, but I know what it means.
Kevin Davis I need it
Wait black hawk down was during Clinton??????
www.history.com/this-day-in-history/bush-orders-u-s-troops-to-somalia
Yes it was
@5:20,'course the Battle of Mogadishu was under Clinton
0:20 Ahh Harry Potter shirt!!! *does excited happy dance*
At least he didn't cause 9/11...
that was his son bush also killed me your lord and saviour harambe
Swellpearz ROTMG who is Leafy?
Texas with democrats is like California with republicans
Bensten "made Quayle look good"? Bensten absolutely humiliated Quayle in the Vice Presidential debate after Quayle's JFK comparison.
my dad took that photo of mike duckis in the tank and it was that photo that sunk his candidacy
Europe next, please (:
Macrame School Bradley is a cool rocking dude
John is pretty harsh on Bush's foreign policy. However, especially relative to the next 16 years, it was pretty good. He managed to not do dumb things in a big way (like antagonize Russia at its most vulnerable). I suppose he could have acted more decisively in Yugo - but so could have like, ya know, Europe. Sending troops on an aid mission to Somalia - mixed. Again, the biggest accomplishment was managing the Russian crisis.
This was VERY generous to HW. No mention of his extraordinarily imperialistic policies in Latin America. He did terrible things to Panama and Columbia in our name.
Fantastic graphics from Thought Bubble!
CrashCourse should do Ancient History next
good idea
He already did world history which covers ancient history.
***** he meant only ancient history they are doing US history and they did world history so it would make just as much sense to do a ancient history only
***** Like in such sparse detail yeah, educate yourself
.
Can't wait for the next few episodes, it'll be a firestorm in the comments I'm sure xD
Hey! I just want to say how much I love this UA-cam channel! I honestly do love this UA-cam channel, it’s helped me a lot with history class. Even though I’m homeschooled, My Aunt will add one (or a few) of your videos to her History playlist. And let me say this, y’all are Hilarious! Me and my cousin both love y’alls channel! We both just love the humor! So, thank you so much for teaching me, my cousins, and my little sister so many things that I didn’t know about history! I really do appreciate the effort being put into these videos! Thank y’all 💙😁
An excellent display. I feel very much in-favor of B.H.W. Bush and even more so now.
And only cheated on his wife sometimes 😂
Alasdair Wilson
To be honest though I’d do the same if I lost some kind of bet with the Devil and had to marry HER.
As a moderate who was born 6 years after the 1992 election. George H.W Bush was pretty smart and pragmatic President. He would be unelectable today with republicans calling him the evil establishment because he had experience and was moderate and liberals would vilify him for being born rich as that somehow stops him from being sympathetic to the poor. We need another one like him!
+Shariq Torres But he was a successful and defensive war hawk, since he was in the army and CIA and so was smart with foreign policy.
He raised taxes, expanded health care, increased environmental regulation, negotiated peace deals, and made peace with Russia. All these things would make him a villain in today's Republican Party.
I know, that is what made him interesting. He was willing to be fiscally responsible even it cost him the election (and I hate higher taxes).
I long for the days of the Cold War. The unguided approach to foreign policy is horrendous at best. The nuclear hair-trigger was the only bad part, but that still exists. Back then, we could not take idiots (Mrss. I can see Russia from my house), or the indecisive (Mitt Romney, Harry Reed) seriously. Dead lock was not an option. Space exploration was a valuable asset. The reasons go on, and on... We need another one.
Maybe China, or a resurgent Russia will provide it(That is if Russia, or Putin really, can somehow solve their population crisis). Though I think it's possible to be prosperous and competent without a rival.
But remember, capitalism is like communism because who controls us for power?
DW42536387384 Go away. You are least interesting person to talk to. You try to have the same argument on every video.
I think a United Europe could fill the role too,
Like the Victorian Era? A Scramble for Mars maybe? But that might just spark WWIII. I think some sort of conflict will be inevitable. Living in peace is just in not human nature.
We'll always have wars because some nations learn to be fools for ridiculous ambition, which will cost them, their prestige.
Yay! No partisanship and name calling by the narrator! One of you best on that score, John.
Jessie Jackson is really......Neil Degrasse Tyson? 2:35
Read my lips
I don't follow his words because those words he says is tyrannical.
Dick (Cheney) was actually born on the 30th of January, and not on the 23rd. I'm thinking it was the thought bubble's fault and not really yours. I have learned so much from your series. I was born in Titoslavia in the 80s and your take on the Balkans in the 90s was spot on. You make history informative and a lot of fun.
please, do Europe History next :)
That would either be a colossal undertaking (compared to the US, Europe isn't seen as united in the same way and the documented history is extensively larger) or too broad and inevitably skim across the surface - resulting in reductive explanations. Unless they were to parcel them up akin to the World History series, but why not then just return to said series.
straitJacketFashion well, Europe is not a country, hence you can't have the same approach as with the US history. But he did pretty good job on the world history, so I was thinking that maybe a similar angle would work. I have faith in mr. Green.
Ugh...Have we not heard enough about European history? I'd rather hear the history of shovels.
Maurice McDonald well, than you do not have to watch it. now tell me the history of how you hit yourself with a shovel.
lol most of the history we're taught is basically European history anyways. (or at least an outgrowth of European history)
I guess it looks like the final episode is going to talk about 9/11 and GWB's presidency.
I have a feeling hes going to not only criticize the security acts passed post-911 like The Patriot Act but hes going to get a huge backlash no matter what stance Green takes.
Nobody this comment didn’t age well as his last episode wasn’t about 9/11
Do British History next, only reasonable after American except for maybe Russian or Canadian.
Can't get enough of Crash Course. I watch it in Geography class and now at home; I'm going mad!
WHAT?! you dont have paid leave?!?1?1 (I am from Brazil);
The gulf war not the first Iraq war.
The gulf war is generally referred to as the first Iraqi war in the US.
The Iran/Iraq war
The Gulf War
The Iraq War
BTW Iraq invasion of Kawai happen the after the State Department said that it would get involve in a boarder depute between to.
2 hours tanks rolled
Dan Heidel It is? I've always referred to it as the Gulf War, and referred the to the war in Iraq that started in 2003 the Iraq War.
Alberto Vasquez at the time, the Iran/Iraq war was refered to in the news as "the gulf war". It was all over the TV when I was a kid. However, it is probably the same as referring to World War I as the Great War back when it was happening and during the 20s and 30s.
MrBulbasaurlover
It might be where we live. Where I'm at, I usually hear 'first Gulf War'.
Regardless, in the US, the two terms are synonymous.
Any history on the Balkans please?
1.Alexander the great
2.Byzantine empire
AND THEN Turks=death of the balkans
6:55
Imagine being POTUS and pulling up acts and bills to sign CDC like that lmaooo
Frankly, my only working memory of the first Bush was that simpson's episode.
Last best president ever
It appears that John can't keep his personal political bias out of these videos. It would serve us better if he just sticked to the facts instead of hinting through obvious insinuations that he's a liberal, a fact we already know and doesn't add anything of value to what he's supposed to be explaining.
Can we infer he's liberal from his enunciations, yeah, but what he's been saying in the video is hardly biased. If you were looking for bias, you could do a hell of a lot worse.
+BucketheadChuck You say that like being liberal is by definition a bad thing, and that pisses me off, like it would annoy you if I went around acting like being whatever you are is by definition a bad thing.
I'll never forget this. I was just out of HS when the gulf war started. I'LL NEVER FORGET my best friends dad (Vietnam vet) advised us to enlist BEFORE we got drafted so you get a kinda sorta choice on your assignment. We decided to be in tanks figuring (naively) that snipers can't get us easily therefor increasing our chances to survive. But I remember feeling and saying to everyone EXACTLY the same thing Mr. Green says in the mystery document: "If we haveto go, we haveto go. But it would be a shame."
If my experience watching anime has taught me anything, it's that now we can expect a filler arc to pad out some time for the source material to get ahead.
George H. W. Bush is the Garlic Jr. of American history.
It's pronounced ir-rock not eye-rack :) Sorry, had to bring that up ;) Spent time in Alabama too (Homewood) so things slip in for me as well.
it's actually "al-‘Irāq"
I hasten to remind you that mispronouncing things, IS HIS THING!
The Bushes had a habit of doing that as well so I guess it fits :)
***** I say TUSA.
"the present" *me watching this 10 years after it uploaded*
after this let's learn more about africa
***** I was thinking not of a single "episode" on africa but a series which attempts to discuss as many regions and peoples as possible throughout time. Also I think crash course is meant more just to educate people in general.. the fact kids aren't taught about africa at all is outrageous.. African civilizations have thrived and been quite culturally rich and complex compared to modern mainstream conceptions of africa as being just another wild place.
Time order: Immigration out of Africa, Mud Huts and Spears, Egyptians, Arab Invaders with Islam, Colonialism, Decolonialism, Mud Huts and AK 47's
Honestly, I think liberals tend to be more of the younger generation, while conservatives tend to be older. At least economically, younger people want more equal economic rights and equality with the older richer people. The reason conservatives are older is because they want to keep their money.
Obviously this is the stereotype and not necessarily true all the time.
Anon Ymous
but a very high majority of the time when it comes to people in government positions especially
John ( as well as everyone behind the scenes) thanks for giving a fair and level headed assessment of a presidency that most people feel is a foot note in our history.
FORMER ACTORS? REGAN WAS AWESOME!
Hey, good job making a video that was truly moderate. It's so common for people to go into all out bashing mode or all out defense mode when discussing anything conservative or republican. It's refreshing to hear someone say, "there were things they did wrong AND things they did well". Imagine that, a somewhat unbiased point of view.
usually well informed, but what is missing here is why did America turn on Saddam Hussien? Why was he an ally right through the 80's while he committed human rights violations only to be invaded by America when he invaded Kuwait? Why does America engage intervene in foreign affairs, to promote democracy and peace and protect innocent lives or to secure foreign resources, usually oil? These are the questions this channel and everybody else needs to ask more often
They Didnt innvade Iraq during the gulf war in kuwait. Iraq was innvaded in 2003 due to false accusations of having weapons of mass destruction, however an US promoted uprising DID happend right after the gulf war cease fire aggreement in southern Iraq
I'm pretty liberal. But I come from a military family and we live us some Stormin Norman. What a badass.
He kind of didn't lie... he didn't create any "New Taxes", he just increased the ones we already had.... ha ha
Daniel Cline
Gotta love loopholes.
9:49
2020: hold my beer
R.I.P. Bush
BUT WHO WAS LIPS?
George Bush
Um Bill Clinton was the president during Black Hawk Down
Gabriel McGuoirk True. He didn't say that the date of the incident happened while Pres. Bush was in office. However, he was pointing out the fact that it was Bush who ordered the US Military to get into the situation. This happened in 1992, while Bush was president. I believe it was called Operation Hope or something like that.
Nice job animation crew! Really well done!!
My god...Raoul Meyer is just John Green REGENERATED. Older John Green accidentally went back in time and picked up his past self. This whole show is done in a TARDIS because that's the only place that will support the obvious paradox of two John Greens. And the show is done before older John Green regenerates into Raoul Meyer, who gets stuck in the past because his TARDIS blew up. AND STAN AND THE CREW ARE HIS COMPANIONS who are pretending to be shooting a show to lessen the paradox. And the shock pen is a way to jumpstart John's regeneration before he exists the TARDIS with his past self, creating a paradox in the universe that can't be contained by the TARDIS.
my mum saw american soldiers when she was fleeing the conflict in somalia
how did she describe it?
Man, where in the world can't you see American soldiers running around, lets be real
+Jenkins lol
Jenkins true
Shadow Slayer she felt scared but safe at the same time
I needed to send over 500 resumes before finding a position. Thanks degree in physics.
Awesome episode. Next Stop is the Clinton Years!
Anyone saw that triangle appear when he said "new world order"?
What could this hint?
ILLUMINATI CONFIRMED
I
Hoping for crash course physics, but I heard it's crash course literature.
TallBison Hank already said there will be no crash course: physics because he does not feel qualified to teach it.
TallBison literature and psychology.
John's doing another literature miniseries with 12 (I think) different books. Hank is doing psychology.
British bastard! It's all bout ENGLAND
I firmly believe that George H.W. Bush was the best President since Eisenhower left office. Was he perfect, no, but he was pretty damn good!
Saddam was evil, this is true. But what is it you moderns have against good ol'fashioned conquest? I was never an aggressive expander, albeit I shrunk the empire, but I still do not understand your abhorrence with expansion....
We have moral convictions against doing such, these days. Opportunistic war in general, not just expansionist war, is heavily frowned upon. This is so for many reasons, but is largely because modern war with modern weapons is incredibly bloody, and should be an absolute last resort when all other avenues of diplomacy have been exhausted.
Also, democracy had a bit of a revival since your time. Most people around the world live in countries with at least *some* degree of democracy. So the prevailing mood in the world is: The people deserve to rule themselves. Expansionist war violates this principle.
There's an entire laundry list of reasons, really, why us 'moderns' have misgivings about conquest. If you have regular access to the internet, I suggest continuing what you're doing right now, and watch more history videos. :) It will go far in explaining the answer to your question.
spanishgame
Let me shorten your essay to one sentence:
After conquering the Spanish Empire, annexing its shithole colonies (Puerto Rico and the Philippines) and attempting to integrate its people, the US learned that economic conquest is better than military conquest.
You spent less than 10% talking about the cold war (THE ACTUAL TITLE) and you just talked about bush. Misleading title come on
if you guys want a great goverment that cares about its citizens and have a good quality of life and has many social programs move to canada
No don't come here!
dont want americans in our country?
I can't. I read the immigration policies. Apparently they don't accept immigrants with bad credit because no one wants to take in someone running from debt.
You got lucky this time, Canada, us 'muricans are stuck for now. (lbr, at least half of us here are in debt up to our ears THANKS COLLEGE AND MEDICAL BILLS)
BAssCaveMan Not quite, cutie pie. America (technically the United States of America) is a country. NORTH America (and SOUTH America) is a continent. So Canada is North American, but not American. It may not seem a big distinction, but if American described continental regions instead of just a country, Brazil or Argentina would be American, and they clearly are not. The North and South prefixes are important.
I'm fun at parties, yadda yadda.
U wanna form a union, Canada?
This is a shame that the video that talks about the end of the Cold War dosnt have Reagan in the title
ALLIED7621 Name 3.
ALLIED7621 Lincoln was republican, which back in 1860's, meant he was liberal. Regan sold guns to contra's in Iran. Carson compared Obama Care to slavery. Rand Paul has said he would be happy if the UN was dissolved. Name more please.
ALLIED7621 I don't believe I was using an ad hominem, all my facts were relivant to the augment. I can accept other people's opinions. I cannot accept people with ignorant opinions.
ALLIED7621 No, I used their actions. To judge wether or not they were good people. I never said that Reagan was a bad man because he was a conservative. But rather I said he was a bad man because he sold guns to Iran.
ALLIED7621 No thats not at all what I was saying. I was saying that Reagan is a bad person because of his actions. The definition of ad hominem is "Directed against the person rather than the position". I was saying he can't be a good man because he sold guns to Sadam Hussain. Which a very bad thing to do. Regardless of who they are.