Great video. I own the original TS-1440 version and while the image stabilization on the originals is almost as good as the TSXs, the side tracking delay is drastically reduced with the TSXs. I mean it’s substantial. The overall designed is enhanced and I like that Fuji didn’t just repackage them in a nicer body, they actually provided the consumer technical enhancements (5 degrees vs 6 degrees vibration reduction, etc). They are awesome binos
Great video!Please how is Fujinon TSX 14140 with chromatic aberration, false colours ? Because I just returned Canon 14X32 IS -very very bad in this, really shame-"rainbow" instead of branches or birds against sky!!!Than I found on Canon website full technical specification and their line 10,12,14X32 IS has zero UD, ufufuf, and I (stupid) didnt buy 15-50 IS WP because was cheaper,so I logically assumed higher quality of 14X32.BTW.15,18X50 IS WP have 1 UD , 10X42 L has 2 UD. But now I dont believe in Canons!It seems -according to this video from it-that it looks perfect,but I better asking you, your experience ,I am very interested in this Fujinon,thanks a lot for your opinion!!!
Look at @5:51 - it looks like CA is controlled rather good, jut keep in mind that the video is of crappy U-tube quality. BTW, he'd used most elaborate setup to shoot thru binos I'd ever saw, so I rate his results above ubiquitous smartphone shots thru eyepiece.
Great video.
I own the original TS-1440 version and while the image stabilization on the originals is almost as good as the TSXs, the side tracking delay is drastically reduced with the TSXs. I mean it’s substantial. The overall designed is enhanced and I like that Fuji didn’t just repackage them in a nicer body, they actually provided the consumer technical enhancements (5 degrees vs 6 degrees vibration reduction, etc).
They are awesome binos
Video starts at 5:41
good job, helped me decide. thanks
Rob, could you please tell us the details of the rig for mounting the camera and teh binoculars.
Great video!Please how is Fujinon TSX 14140 with chromatic aberration, false colours ? Because I just returned Canon 14X32 IS -very very bad in this, really shame-"rainbow" instead of branches or birds against sky!!!Than I found on Canon website full technical specification and their line 10,12,14X32 IS has zero UD, ufufuf, and I (stupid) didnt buy 15-50 IS WP because was cheaper,so I logically assumed higher quality of 14X32.BTW.15,18X50 IS WP have 1 UD , 10X42 L has 2 UD. But now I dont believe in Canons!It seems -according to this video from it-that it looks perfect,but I better asking you, your experience ,I am very interested in this Fujinon,thanks a lot for your opinion!!!
Look at @5:51 - it looks like CA is controlled rather good, jut keep in mind that the video is of crappy U-tube quality. BTW, he'd used most elaborate setup to shoot thru binos I'd ever saw, so I rate his results above ubiquitous smartphone shots thru eyepiece.
Can they be used with NiMH?
04:40