12:45 You can also erase songs, which keep all other sounds. This is the downside of recording videos weeks in advance. It's a newer beta feature which work quite well.
Why is it that a company can strike your channel without any proof? Not claim, but strike. My content is original, fair use, but does use video game assets. I have hundreds of videos like this, but one day....a video game company just decided to strike my videos. No warning, no request for removal....just Strikes. We emailed back and forth and they ended up removing the strikes. But they had zero grounds for the strikes in the first place. YT did nothing to stop them
because youtube only cares about big company's and not creators. ''the mythology guy'' has over a million subs and he still gets false copyright claims.
@@WiseTree2939 i basically got bullied into taking down my videos because they found them to be controversial. That was after 16 emails back and forth. We made a "deal." I dont have the money to fight their claims in court, so to get the strikes removed, I said ok.
This is AI response to the question “Can a copyright holder reserve the right to display their content on the internet with interactive features?” >Yes, a copyright holder can reserve the right to display their content on the internet with interactive features, such as user comments and likes, while restricting others from doing so without permission. > >When a copyright holder licenses their work, they can specify the terms and conditions under which the work can be used, including whether it can be displayed with interactive features. If someone else displays the work without permission, or without adhering to the specified terms, they may be infringing on the copyright holder's exclusive rights. > >In the United States, for example, the Copyright Act of 1976 gives copyright holders the exclusive right to display their work publicly, including the right to determine how and in what context their work is displayed. This includes the right to decide whether their work is displayed with interactive features or not. > >It's worth noting that copyright laws vary by country, so the specifics of what rights are reserved by the copyright holder and what constitutes infringement may differ depending on the jurisdiction. If you have specific questions or concerns about copyright law, it's always a good idea to consult with a qualified legal professional.
Some scammer makes a BS copyright claim by downloading from the UA-cam audio library the same track as you and adds their bit like singing, rapping etc. You use that same music from the library and they know it is free, but UA-cam's copyright matching system says you used their content - they know you did NOT infringe on them in any way, but they STILL claim against you to fraudulently receive any potential income from your hard work and UA-cam refers to them as the copyright owner - really boils my you know what.
One extra piece of advice I would have liked to know before: **Save a copy of everything you receive and send** because AFAIK there is no way to check your history of claims/appeals. I have a video using a public domain version of classical music and it's getting claimed again and again. One of the times it got to an appeal and I was ready to get the strike and go to court because I was pissed off. The first time I had to dispute a claim the proof I sent was great but was lost once I sent it. You don't receive a copy in your email nor can check it afterwards. The time I had to dispute the appeal I ended up finding a video of the recording session of the piece and references of the license owner stating it was public domain. Now that text and links are stored in my docs so I can reuse it whenever it's claimed again.
It's frustrating to me when I compose a track from scratch and then I get a claim a week later. 70% of the time are fake claims , 30% similar melodies / soundfonts.
This is the best explanation I've seen yet about UA-cam's copyright policy, including videos UA-cam itself has made about it. I do wish there were a more fair and clear system in place for creators, but it has gotten slightly better over the years.
If ever I get a copyright claim or a copyright strike on one of my videos, I won't linger on at all, because it is pretty serious. I'll immediately remove my concerned video. No time to waste! No discussion with the owner of a Copyright! 2:23
I hope one day UA-cam lets us literally straight up replace the whole audio in a video. For example, think reediting the audio in your video in Premiere, then exporting it as an MP3 and uploading it, and UA-cam re-muxes the video with the new audio. :( Though I suppose bad actors would abuse such a feature somehow and ruin it for everyone.
I got hit by a scam artist on my channel with music that I created 100% on my own. No loops, beats or samples used. I disputed it and the company still said they had a claim. I reported it to youtube. For mine, they're trying to claim monetization when my videos don't even make money. It's just bs and so draining to deal with. If youtube doesn't stop this, I'm just removing all my original music.
I deal with unintentional music playing in pretty much every video I film since I cover car shows. I've heard I can dispute it, but it takes thirty days. I have learned to keep the clips short even though it takes much longer to film and edit. When I get a copyright notice while uploading a video I just go back an re-edit and re-upload. I'm going to try the song removal feature next time I get copyrighted, but I'm worried it will take too long to process since most of my videos are over an hour long. Wish UA-cam had a button to check when uploading that any music in the video is unintentional since it should fall under fair use since I'm covering a newsworthy event and didn't add the music myself. I have also tried using AI music tracks I made to cover up copyrighted music, but it looks like the record companies are coming after that next.
We have exactly the same question. We film carnivals, parades, street parties. It is impossible to publish a meaningful video of the event without including the original audio which we have no control over. We are recording events officially recognised as being of international touristic importance. This is cleary a case of fair use but some videos have ten or more copyright claims on them. We are eligible to monitize the channel but have refrained form doing so at the moment. How should we proceed?
The most important thing is to always have proof that you have a license, or had one at the time you were using it. Everything else is just details, and you'll get that cleared, my friend 😉
A lot of the time that is not enough. For instance I had written permission to use someone photographs in an explanation video. However the video was still strciked by someone with multiple different names and was using one of my university friends images. he (assumingly) was placing a claim on the beauty of the photograph creator who me and the photograph creator had no idea who they were nor wanted the claim. The Copyright algorithm is great but it is also open to mass abuse. Even with evidence to counter the the fake copyright strikers claim and with UA-cam on Twitter getting involved. it was not enough for a computer to decide (literally no one on the copyright at UA-cam looked at the evidence). I had to then re upload the video with the identity of the Photographs blued something that the photograph creator was as she wanted her story told without censorship.
@@TrendlineProject I was going to make a video about it but after seeing similar content from other creators and realising I would be posting something outside of my niche I just thought what would be the point. A minority might see it and it would nit change anything.
We film carnivals, festivals and parades, nightlife etc. We live in major tourist destination with over 5 million visitors per year. The street parades can have for example 100 floats with huge sound systems. Many of these events are officially recognised as events of international touristic importance. The people at the event which we are filming are reacting to the music, but we have no control over the music being played. Likewise it is not possible to publish a meaningful video of the event without the background sound because the audience are dancing to it, singing along etc. Having read all the 'best practice' guidelines that even UA-cam direct us towards, our channel comes under the category of journalism. Fair use says that the sound recorded during the events is incidental and accidental as we have no control over it, nor are we directing or requesting the DJs play any particular song. The topic and reason of our videos is to promote the actual event we are recording. We haven't monitized the channel yet though we are eligible to do so. Many of our videos have copyright claims that say they have no effect on the channel. In some cases there may be 10 or more claims on one video. If we find we can't monitize a video and want to be paid for the hard work we put in to making it (three camera operators working on most of them) then do we have to dispute every single claim on a video individually or can we just claim fair use on the video overall due to journalistic exemption?
Nice to see some likes, but where to find advice how to make sure we are paid by UA-cam for our videos? After all we are the ones doing the hard work here and UA-cam run ads on our original content so I assume they are getting paid.
You have no idea how perfect this videos timing is. One of my videos in getting super popular, but it got copyright claimed. I'll have to use these tips.
I had several copyright claims from a company in South America when my grandmother played her piano and sang old public domain gospel hymns on my channel. I disputed every one of the claims, and won the disputes, but haven't bothered to use any kind of music since.
I have heard of this. The company claims ownership of the basic melody of most gospel songs. Folks who post gospel videos run across this pretty much every time they post a video.
I upload original classical piano performances. I used to get a copyright claim for everything I upload because UA-cam bots can’t tell the difference between one artist’s performance of the same piece from a performance by another artist of the same work. I have noticed the number of those notifications has dropped to almost nothing now. I am not sure what changed. Perhaps the bots are becoming classical music savvy and can identify different performances. However, in the past I solved the problem by disputing claims as original content pointing to the video of me playing the piece as evidence of my original performance, and the claims would be removed within a few days.
A couple months ago I was just starting out and made a video but it got copyright claimed. I didn’t know what it meant at the time because I was stupid but I panicked because the copyright claim was a song I used for background music so I basically had to take the video down to get the claim off or just remove the song entirely making it a really bad video. The song I used was from CapCut so I thought it was fine because I got it from cap cut. Guess what I did between removing the song and taking down the video😂
well said: "it´s not perfect at all" ... From the view of a content creator: I fully produce my own material (reviews, diy-stuff, darts tipps) and found a channel, that uses parts of my content out of context and totally wrong messages. I couldn´t contact the other channel, because there was no mail, no adress and he deleted my comment directly and banned me of his channel. So i tried to claim my content and UA-cam not only gave the other channel my name and channelname, so that he knew it was me. UA-cam simply said "this is fair use" and gave ME a warning, that they will strike my channel if I go on with claims they decide for the other party. That said: since then the other channel insults me personally and pretty regularly for more than 12 months now and still uses my content as he wants to.
The one i get really frustrated with is I have paid for licenses to use clips of music and yet 2 or 3 different people will claim copyright on it even on UA-cams own music for creators and we are expected to remove it. If its not meant for content creators use then why have they added it to programs we pay for or why is UA-cam themselves allowing us to use the music when people are being copyrighted for it. It is incredibly frustrating for many people especially smaller channels and it appears to happen more the closer they are to monetization or if it is just after. It is almost like a spite attack by trolls. I've even had one where the person who made the original claim was not the person cited when I put in the appeal with the license information and it was STILL turned down.
This was extremely helpful. I will often put the music I used in the description and it helps from getting copyrighted but it only works when the video is private first. I wish there was a way if your video gets copyrighted later on after being posted and you take action and put the music you used in the description and it goes away. I’ve tried all of those four ways and it really screwed up my videos.
Hi! I am using CAPCUT licensed music in many of my videos, so should I simply consider that the musical artists are making copyright claims unjustified, if they authorize their work to CAPCUT?
I'm having a similar problem with Clipchamp. I think it is mishandling of someone's copyright by third party websites that the apps are using. In the end, I stopped using music from editing apps because I don't trust that they've asked permission from the musicians or recording companies themselves but took a shortcut to third parties. That is my best guess when looking into it.
Thanks for this information!!! I do have a question. Regarding “Reused Content.” Sometimes I like to publish both a “full version”of a video for those who want all the details and then publish another version that has been edited down with less details. Is using my own published content to create a shorter version from it a violation?
If you have a video which you split into short clips - then do a long video with all the clips included together - will UA-cam class that as being Re-used content?
reused content.. i do videos for babies to sleep and I do my own animations with paid audio segments. I have the same video but with different lengths like 2 hours, 5 hours or 8 hours. UA-cam decided that this is reused content...
From your experience in copyright violations If we contact the content creator who gave us the warning Is it acceptable to agree to remove the strike in exchange for a sum of money?
This is AI response to the question “Can a copyright holder reserve the right to display their content on the internet with interactive features?” >Yes, a copyright holder can reserve the right to display their content on the internet with interactive features, such as user comments and likes, while restricting others from doing so without permission. > >When a copyright holder licenses their work, they can specify the terms and conditions under which the work can be used, including whether it can be displayed with interactive features. If someone else displays the work without permission, or without adhering to the specified terms, they may be infringing on the copyright holder's exclusive rights. > >In the United States, for example, the Copyright Act of 1976 gives copyright holders the exclusive right to display their work publicly, including the right to determine how and in what context their work is displayed. This includes the right to decide whether their work is displayed with interactive features or not. > >It's worth noting that copyright laws vary by country, so the specifics of what rights are reserved by the copyright holder and what constitutes infringement may differ depending on the jurisdiction. If you have specific questions or concerns about copyright law, it's always a good idea to consult with a qualified legal professional.
For videos with over 100k views you can't even edit it to remove the copyright material. I have a joint account with my sister where we make fanvids/AMVs/crackvids and we got a copyright claim for a 17 second song clip that completely blocked one of our crackvids. The video had over 100k views so we couldn't do anything to remove that part and it had been up for over 5 years before they claimed and blocked our video. We contested the claim and they rejected it, but luckily they modified the terms so that it was only blocked in certain regions and now it's back up. UA-cam should at the very least allow editing to fix copyright issues regardless of the view count.
What frustrates me is when you download music from a Royalty Free website like pixabay and a 3rd party on behalf of the owner hits you with a copyright claim. I use a certain song on one of my youtube channels in the intro so I get a claim on every video I upload. If a song is on any Royalty Free website it should be intelligible for copyright claim at any time on UA-cam. I appreciate UA-cam working with creators to protect their original content and I applaud that. However, I think some adjustment still needs made and if any song is found to be on a Royalty Free site UA-cam needs to make it ineligible from copyright claim.
There are 2 channels who reused our videos, downloaded, then uploaded them,one replacing the live audio with a vinyl recording and UA-cam tells us that we reused their videos, apparently the AI and the person double checking cant read dates.
As someone who has faced both ends of the copyright/strike section I find it incredibly infuriating. When some one reuses large chunks of your original video and you cannot take money from it but only strike them (something that IMO limits free speech). Also the one occasional I was illegally striked by someone with multiple names using an image of one of my university friends supposedly someone else (how on earth is that allowed). Even when the image creator had not only given me permission to use the images but also claimed that the copyright striker was nothing to do with them and actively tried working with me to counter the strike. UA-cam atm are probably the best at representing copyright holder and protecting their rights (which is a must). However it also does not mean the system is perfect. The whole system is open to abuse, and they are countless examples including MR Beast where the system was abused . If I really wanted to I could create a bunch of random accounts and strike a number of Vid IQ channel of some one else and probably get away with it due to the lack of human moderation, and the fact I would have the final say (judge and jury). Im not a law expert and don't pretend to be. But What there needs is slight adaptation in policy. Checks and balances to make sure that only legal companies and relevant individuals can claim on breath of someone. When Escalation happens there needs to be human moderation something in my case would had easily solve the claimant as being a fraud, and finally for governments and authorities holding UA-cam to account to avoid the high profile cases like 'ObbyRaidz' and the 'fat rat' incidents.
Okay you’ve convinced me. I was just going to make my channel an art journal but now I’m going to plan for some educational videos as well as I have some ideas that I’ve been bouncing around in my head. Btw if anyone is wondering I do not intend to teach art on my channel. That’s been overdone and at this point in art side of UA-cam there are so many people selling shovels that it’s hard to see the actual mines.
I heard that a lots of people who makes music get copyright claims on their music. Sometimes even big music companies (upload services) are behind those false claims. But they win in the end. How to prevent that?
One time, one of my favorite UA-camrs got false copyright claims from a channel who was banned from a game for cheating that the youtuber used to post videos of, so they would try to get channels that made vids on that game taken down. Couple days later, the youtuber who got false copyright claims had their channel taken down, later that day they got back up, and I just checked, and the youtuber who gave the false copyright claims got their channel deleted.
If a channel produced 4 separate video tutorials with all original content… later makes a condensed montage into a new highlights video would that be ineligible reused content ???? Thanks to anyone who responds
12:13 a question about that UA-cam says that when this Copyright Match Tool found new matches in UA-cam Studio they will send bell notifications but i don't receive any notifications while the Tool is finding matches alot of times I don't understand what happened Cau ya help me please 🙏 😢 Thanks 😊
Maybe check your notifications are setup correctly to receive copyright matches. Otherwise, contact YT support through the studio dashboard (if you are monetized).
This whole copyright "claim" issue is ridiculous. I get a "copyright" on some of my videos even when I give full, complete credit information for the music in my description box. I never get a strike, only a claim. I think UA-cam is trying to force people to use the music from their library. That's okay if the music is not especially pertinent but only for background purposes. But when the music is pertinent to the content, I think it's coercive and I'm going to leave the music in the video with credit info as I've been doing. I'm not going to waste my time when I'm following UA-cam's own guidelines.
You honestly should only use the "remove song" feature. No risks, no problems, no big affect on your video. Gets back the monetisation, and you will get money, never give up 🚩
Brother, I have a question that if I delete the blocked and copyrighted video, then the copyright will be removed and there will be no effect on the channel. Please sir, please tell me about this.
I don't get copyright claims but if I use music from Share Factory Studio over the top of game play videos I get copyright issues. They say it's not a "copyright strike" so I don't bother doing anything. If my channel gets bigger I'll hire someone to do that tedious stuff for me, that's the dream.
You can find more information on copyright claims and copyright strikes here: ua-cam.com/users/shortsjRRKK7kCnhA ua-cam.com/users/shortskjHao9f3ggQ ua-cam.com/users/shortsGcMeVYsp9Rc ua-cam.com/users/shortsiUlUFO9kghQ ua-cam.com/video/mVc4oW2OVhM/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/NhA_WTcMnic/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/bBV80MgmEz8/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/2_o6qLP85rM/v-deo.html
You can find more information on copyright claims and copyright strikes here: ua-cam.com/users/shortsjRRKK7kCnhA ua-cam.com/users/shortskjHao9f3ggQ ua-cam.com/users/shortsGcMeVYsp9Rc ua-cam.com/users/shortsiUlUFO9kghQ ua-cam.com/video/mVc4oW2OVhM/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/NhA_WTcMnic/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/bBV80MgmEz8/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/2_o6qLP85rM/v-deo.html
UA-cam Studio has a channel copyright tab that shows you when people have used your content. When attempting to copyright strike them, you must consider first if their video falls within the domain of "Fair Use". You can also use this feature to DM the offending party. You could ask for compensation for your work, or whatever you want to let them use your work.
I had this happen with one of my most recent videos. Got an automatic claim from an artist for using their music. Problem is, I didn't use their music. I used a sound clip from a 23 year old video game. The artist that UA-cam flagged as a copyright, sampled that same video games sound clip in their song. I'm disputing it hard, because if anyone is going to file a claim, i want it to be the person that actually made the original track.
as someone who makes videos in my niche, i get a lot of copyright claims and i mute the copyrighted sounds. however i don't know if my content is considered fair use. i hope i don't get rejected when aplying for the ypp
I clicked on some of those before and I thought it was okay just to leave them alone but it looks like I'm going to have to watch your video all the way here and finish watching it and see what I need to do
It’s hard to make music as a musician sometimes I had a copyright on my song…some other musician used the same music that’s royalty free music from my song
I got a copyright claim from a random anime opening channel but i don't even use any song it's in the game it's the main theme of game how do I remove it
Sometimes Claims will be evolved or backfired into a strike when a copyrighted video remains very long tho is only a chance and another chance for a block
i did not get monetized because UA-cam felt i had reused content. My show is a paranormal talk show and a lot of the guests I have on are making the rounds of other shows. I am a journalist in real life. I ask them questions and they answer. i am careful about copying anyone's content. The show is broadcast live. I don't know what to do. I guess ill have to find funding elsewhere.
Very fair the reused content is not, because they are only going to comment on it first if you want to be in the youtube program. Before that they did use the same videos to make their own money by showing ads when someone watches those videos, and then when you apply for monitazition they are going to say we won't allow it! Well smart considering they make money from it by showing ads and the owner of the channel is sent hiking.
Pardon me but I have reached minimum monetisation requirements but YT tells me I need to build channel history. I have not had any channel strikes... how do I go about this
Talking about copyright, how about videos or shorts, using AI to generate stories, images, scripts, etc. But I always mentioned it in my description for every video. And of course, I always use some of my own scripts. If a company likes you using their tools, it should be allowed because we are also promoting their tools. It's a win-win for both creators and the company. Maybe vidIQ can make a video about this or related if possible. Thanks. 🤔
Hello Fellow UA-camrs ,i have a question Do movie clip/trailer channels get monetized ,because when i tried to upload movie trailer UA-cam says Copyrighted content cannot be monetized .Please help
I started yesterday and i already have over 3000 views and more subscribers than people I know! The shorts get subscribers! I was just joking around had no idea. Put time into planning, i have no idea how to shoot or edit or anything technical but i have my next 10+ videos already planned out. I think it helps a lot if you know what you want it to look like, it will just take a couple shots to get it that way❤❤❤❤ I wish you all the best of luck, may all your dreams come true!!!
I had used music with commercial rights, and content from public places such as pixabay & utube and I keep getting copyrights notification, even strikes; wrongly, even for the music does not fall within copyright and it is not the music claimed by that artist. What to do in this case?
Thanks for another informative video. I got one going for a walk in the woods just the other day. I did do a short cover of a passenger tune and changed the key and and thought the timing was so off, i even got words wrong. I am very laid back about my vids and except clips even if I feel cringe from time to time. Never got a Dylan copyright. I hear people singing their favorite songs online everyday as i adore my music. I am starting to feel i just don't have the UA-cam face like you do. Take Care...🙏🙏
12:45 You can also erase songs, which keep all other sounds. This is the downside of recording videos weeks in advance. It's a newer beta feature which work quite well.
I know I must admit I have used that once or twice it is a life saver
Have you heard the results though? Sounds absolutely shocking!
Why is it that a company can strike your channel without any proof? Not claim, but strike. My content is original, fair use, but does use video game assets. I have hundreds of videos like this, but one day....a video game company just decided to strike my videos. No warning, no request for removal....just Strikes.
We emailed back and forth and they ended up removing the strikes. But they had zero grounds for the strikes in the first place. YT did nothing to stop them
Unfortunately, this can happen too... Glad the strike is removed!
because youtube only cares about big company's and not creators. ''the mythology guy'' has over a million subs and he still gets false copyright claims.
@@WiseTree2939 i basically got bullied into taking down my videos because they found them to be controversial. That was after 16 emails back and forth. We made a "deal." I dont have the money to fight their claims in court, so to get the strikes removed, I said ok.
Welp copyright claim or strike, all I know is I'll keep creating content for my 37 subs 🔥💪
This is AI response to the question “Can a copyright holder reserve the right to display their content on the internet with interactive features?”
>Yes, a copyright holder can reserve the right to display their content on the internet with interactive features, such as user comments and likes, while restricting others from doing so without permission.
>
>When a copyright holder licenses their work, they can specify the terms and conditions under which the work can be used, including whether it can be displayed with interactive features. If someone else displays the work without permission, or without adhering to the specified terms, they may be infringing on the copyright holder's exclusive rights.
>
>In the United States, for example, the Copyright Act of 1976 gives copyright holders the exclusive right to display their work publicly, including the right to determine how and in what context their work is displayed. This includes the right to decide whether their work is displayed with interactive features or not.
>
>It's worth noting that copyright laws vary by country, so the specifics of what rights are reserved by the copyright holder and what constitutes infringement may differ depending on the jurisdiction. If you have specific questions or concerns about copyright law, it's always a good idea to consult with a qualified legal professional.
Some scammer makes a BS copyright claim by downloading from the UA-cam audio library the same track as you and adds their bit like singing, rapping etc. You use that same music from the library and they know it is free, but UA-cam's copyright matching system says you used their content - they know you did NOT infringe on them in any way, but they STILL claim against you to fraudulently receive any potential income from your hard work and UA-cam refers to them as the copyright owner - really boils my you know what.
I want to know more about the fraudulent copyright claim and strike. Some company just claim everything even when them obviously doesn't own it.
One extra piece of advice I would have liked to know before: **Save a copy of everything you receive and send** because AFAIK there is no way to check your history of claims/appeals. I have a video using a public domain version of classical music and it's getting claimed again and again. One of the times it got to an appeal and I was ready to get the strike and go to court because I was pissed off.
The first time I had to dispute a claim the proof I sent was great but was lost once I sent it. You don't receive a copy in your email nor can check it afterwards. The time I had to dispute the appeal I ended up finding a video of the recording session of the piece and references of the license owner stating it was public domain. Now that text and links are stored in my docs so I can reuse it whenever it's claimed again.
It's frustrating to me when I compose a track from scratch and then I get a claim a week later. 70% of the time are fake claims , 30% similar melodies / soundfonts.
This is my main concern doing music on UA-cam even tho I make it write and record someone can still sit there and claim it or flag it or whatever.
Also, I love the lofi great work.
😂😂 they are so mean omg
@@l.t.3372 Music Thieves lol 👾🎵
This is the best explanation I've seen yet about UA-cam's copyright policy, including videos UA-cam itself has made about it. I do wish there were a more fair and clear system in place for creators, but it has gotten slightly better over the years.
If ever I get a copyright claim or a copyright strike on one of my videos, I won't linger on at all, because it is pretty serious. I'll immediately remove my concerned video. No time to waste! No discussion with the owner of a Copyright! 2:23
Removing a video wouldn't resolve the copyright strike. It would still remain on the channel.
I hope one day UA-cam lets us literally straight up replace the whole audio in a video. For example, think reediting the audio in your video in Premiere, then exporting it as an MP3 and uploading it, and UA-cam re-muxes the video with the new audio. :( Though I suppose bad actors would abuse such a feature somehow and ruin it for everyone.
I got hit by a scam artist on my channel with music that I created 100% on my own. No loops, beats or samples used.
I disputed it and the company still said they had a claim. I reported it to youtube. For mine, they're trying to claim monetization when my videos don't even make money. It's just bs and so draining to deal with. If youtube doesn't stop this, I'm just removing all my original music.
I deal with unintentional music playing in pretty much every video I film since I cover car shows. I've heard I can dispute it, but it takes thirty days. I have learned to keep the clips short even though it takes much longer to film and edit. When I get a copyright notice while uploading a video I just go back an re-edit and re-upload. I'm going to try the song removal feature next time I get copyrighted, but I'm worried it will take too long to process since most of my videos are over an hour long. Wish UA-cam had a button to check when uploading that any music in the video is unintentional since it should fall under fair use since I'm covering a newsworthy event and didn't add the music myself. I have also tried using AI music tracks I made to cover up copyrighted music, but it looks like the record companies are coming after that next.
We have exactly the same question. We film carnivals, parades, street parties. It is impossible to publish a meaningful video of the event without including the original audio which we have no control over. We are recording events officially recognised as being of international touristic importance. This is cleary a case of fair use but some videos have ten or more copyright claims on them. We are eligible to monitize the channel but have refrained form doing so at the moment. How should we proceed?
The most important thing is to always have proof that you have a license, or had one at the time you were using it. Everything else is just details, and you'll get that cleared, my friend 😉
A lot of the time that is not enough. For instance I had written permission to use someone photographs in an explanation video. However the video was still strciked by someone with multiple different names and was using one of my university friends images. he (assumingly) was placing a claim on the beauty of the photograph creator who me and the photograph creator had no idea who they were nor wanted the claim. The Copyright algorithm is great but it is also open to mass abuse. Even with evidence to counter the the fake copyright strikers claim and with UA-cam on Twitter getting involved. it was not enough for a computer to decide (literally no one on the copyright at UA-cam looked at the evidence).
I had to then re upload the video with the identity of the Photographs blued something that the photograph creator was as she wanted her story told without censorship.
@@ImmersiveSportsScience This is mad
@@TrendlineProject I was going to make a video about it but after seeing similar content from other creators and realising I would be posting something outside of my niche I just thought what would be the point. A minority might see it and it would nit change anything.
We film carnivals, festivals and parades, nightlife etc. We live in major tourist destination with over 5 million visitors per year. The street parades can have for example 100 floats with huge sound systems. Many of these events are officially recognised as events of international touristic importance. The people at the event which we are filming are reacting to the music, but we have no control over the music being played. Likewise it is not possible to publish a meaningful video of the event without the background sound because the audience are dancing to it, singing along etc. Having read all the 'best practice' guidelines that even UA-cam direct us towards, our channel comes under the category of journalism. Fair use says that the sound recorded during the events is incidental and accidental as we have no control over it, nor are we directing or requesting the DJs play any particular song. The topic and reason of our videos is to promote the actual event we are recording. We haven't monitized the channel yet though we are eligible to do so. Many of our videos have copyright claims that say they have no effect on the channel. In some cases there may be 10 or more claims on one video. If we find we can't monitize a video and want to be paid for the hard work we put in to making it (three camera operators working on most of them) then do we have to dispute every single claim on a video individually or can we just claim fair use on the video overall due to journalistic exemption?
Nice to see some likes, but where to find advice how to make sure we are paid by UA-cam for our videos? After all we are the ones doing the hard work here and UA-cam run ads on our original content so I assume they are getting paid.
You have no idea how perfect this videos timing is. One of my videos in getting super popular, but it got copyright claimed. I'll have to use these tips.
Lenghthy explanation... Direct to the point how to remove... Please
I had several copyright claims from a company in South America when my grandmother played her piano and sang old public domain gospel hymns on my channel. I disputed every one of the claims, and won the disputes, but haven't bothered to use any kind of music since.
I have heard of this. The company claims ownership of the basic melody of most gospel songs. Folks who post gospel videos run across this pretty much every time they post a video.
I upload original classical piano performances. I used to get a copyright claim for everything I upload because UA-cam bots can’t tell the difference between one artist’s performance of the same piece from a performance by another artist of the same work. I have noticed the number of those notifications has dropped to almost nothing now. I am not sure what changed. Perhaps the bots are becoming classical music savvy and can identify different performances. However, in the past I solved the problem by disputing claims as original content pointing to the video of me playing the piece as evidence of my original performance, and the claims would be removed within a few days.
A couple months ago I was just starting out and made a video but it got copyright claimed. I didn’t know what it meant at the time because I was stupid but I panicked because the copyright claim was a song I used for background music so I basically had to take the video down to get the claim off or just remove the song entirely making it a really bad video. The song I used was from CapCut so I thought it was fine because I got it from cap cut. Guess what I did between removing the song and taking down the video😂
well said: "it´s not perfect at all" ... From the view of a content creator: I fully produce my own material (reviews, diy-stuff, darts tipps) and found a channel, that uses parts of my content out of context and totally wrong messages. I couldn´t contact the other channel, because there was no mail, no adress and he deleted my comment directly and banned me of his channel. So i tried to claim my content and UA-cam not only gave the other channel my name and channelname, so that he knew it was me. UA-cam simply said "this is fair use" and gave ME a warning, that they will strike my channel if I go on with claims they decide for the other party. That said: since then the other channel insults me personally and pretty regularly for more than 12 months now and still uses my content as he wants to.
The one i get really frustrated with is I have paid for licenses to use clips of music and yet 2 or 3 different people will claim copyright on it even on UA-cams own music for creators and we are expected to remove it. If its not meant for content creators use then why have they added it to programs we pay for or why is UA-cam themselves allowing us to use the music when people are being copyrighted for it. It is incredibly frustrating for many people especially smaller channels and it appears to happen more the closer they are to monetization or if it is just after. It is almost like a spite attack by trolls.
I've even had one where the person who made the original claim was not the person cited when I put in the appeal with the license information and it was STILL turned down.
This was extremely helpful. I will often put the music I used in the description and it helps from getting copyrighted but it only works when the video is private first. I wish there was a way if your video gets copyrighted later on after being posted and you take action and put the music you used in the description and it goes away. I’ve tried all of those four ways and it really screwed up my videos.
Hi! I am using CAPCUT licensed music in many of my videos, so should I simply consider that the musical artists are making copyright claims unjustified, if they authorize their work to CAPCUT?
I'm having a similar problem with Clipchamp. I think it is mishandling of someone's copyright by third party websites that the apps are using. In the end, I stopped using music from editing apps because I don't trust that they've asked permission from the musicians or recording companies themselves but took a shortcut to third parties. That is my best guess when looking into it.
@@ArtemisGamingChannel same here
Fun fact: All views of this video are all UA-camrs
Thanks for this information!!! I do have a question. Regarding “Reused Content.”
Sometimes I like to publish both a “full version”of a video for those who want all the details and then publish another version that has been edited down with less details. Is using my own published content to create a shorter version from it a violation?
@ExpatInterview No it isn't.
Can we know more about cover songs?
If you have a video which you split into short clips - then do a long video with all the clips included together - will UA-cam class that as being Re-used content?
Not if it's your own content.
reused content.. i do videos for babies to sleep and I do my own animations with paid audio segments. I have the same video but with different lengths like 2 hours, 5 hours or 8 hours. UA-cam decided that this is reused content...
@@vidIQ I didn't think that was the case, but wasn't 100% sure
@@akaguv Do you use the same content over several videos?
Like share and subscribe guys 😢
I’m way too familiar with this on my Supernanny reaction channel 😆
Great explanation!
Thank you for watching!
Thank you so much 👍
Rob sir what if certain part of the thumbnail is copied and used will it create any problem
Can i use the fair use option for dubbed movies and tv series?
From your experience in copyright violations If we contact the content creator who gave us the warning Is it acceptable to agree to remove the strike in exchange for a sum of money?
This is AI response to the question “Can a copyright holder reserve the right to display their content on the internet with interactive features?”
>Yes, a copyright holder can reserve the right to display their content on the internet with interactive features, such as user comments and likes, while restricting others from doing so without permission.
>
>When a copyright holder licenses their work, they can specify the terms and conditions under which the work can be used, including whether it can be displayed with interactive features. If someone else displays the work without permission, or without adhering to the specified terms, they may be infringing on the copyright holder's exclusive rights.
>
>In the United States, for example, the Copyright Act of 1976 gives copyright holders the exclusive right to display their work publicly, including the right to determine how and in what context their work is displayed. This includes the right to decide whether their work is displayed with interactive features or not.
>
>It's worth noting that copyright laws vary by country, so the specifics of what rights are reserved by the copyright holder and what constitutes infringement may differ depending on the jurisdiction. If you have specific questions or concerns about copyright law, it's always a good idea to consult with a qualified legal professional.
Do they get notified a sound has been erased?
Well-done. I like your contents here.
For videos with over 100k views you can't even edit it to remove the copyright material. I have a joint account with my sister where we make fanvids/AMVs/crackvids and we got a copyright claim for a 17 second song clip that completely blocked one of our crackvids. The video had over 100k views so we couldn't do anything to remove that part and it had been up for over 5 years before they claimed and blocked our video. We contested the claim and they rejected it, but luckily they modified the terms so that it was only blocked in certain regions and now it's back up. UA-cam should at the very least allow editing to fix copyright issues regardless of the view count.
Thanks for the info 😎👍
What frustrates me is when you download music from a Royalty Free website like pixabay and a 3rd party on behalf of the owner hits you with a copyright claim. I use a certain song on one of my youtube channels in the intro so I get a claim on every video I upload. If a song is on any Royalty Free website it should be intelligible for copyright claim at any time on UA-cam. I appreciate UA-cam working with creators to protect their original content and I applaud that. However, I think some adjustment still needs made and if any song is found to be on a Royalty Free site UA-cam needs to make it ineligible from copyright claim.
How do you know it's royalty free just because it says it on a website. Best advice here is to stick to music from the YT library
I know because it does say so on the site and they have cleared the claim on well over 15 videos.
What do you print on your 3d printer?
There are 2 channels who reused our videos, downloaded, then uploaded them,one replacing the live audio with a vinyl recording and UA-cam tells us that we reused their videos, apparently the AI and the person double checking cant read dates.
As someone who has faced both ends of the copyright/strike section I find it incredibly infuriating. When some one reuses large chunks of your original video and you cannot take money from it but only strike them (something that IMO limits free speech).
Also the one occasional I was illegally striked by someone with multiple names using an image of one of my university friends supposedly someone else (how on earth is that allowed). Even when the image creator had not only given me permission to use the images but also claimed that the copyright striker was nothing to do with them and actively tried working with me to counter the strike.
UA-cam atm are probably the best at representing copyright holder and protecting their rights (which is a must). However it also does not mean the system is perfect. The whole system is open to abuse, and they are countless examples including MR Beast where the system was abused . If I really wanted to I could create a bunch of random accounts and strike a number of Vid IQ channel of some one else and probably get away with it due to the lack of human moderation, and the fact I would have the final say (judge and jury).
Im not a law expert and don't pretend to be. But What there needs is slight adaptation in policy. Checks and balances to make sure that only legal companies and relevant individuals can claim on breath of someone. When Escalation happens there needs to be human moderation something in my case would had easily solve the claimant as being a fraud, and finally for governments and authorities holding UA-cam to account to avoid the high profile cases like 'ObbyRaidz' and the 'fat rat' incidents.
I'm finally a YT partner! Good video! Thanks. Shout out to all the other UA-camrs! Hope you have a great day!!!
How you can be partner, if your channel have subscribers less, then 1000?
@Factory_of_funny_videos you can apply after 500 and 3000hrs...you just can't get Adsense revenue until after 1000 subs 4000 watch hours
Every young youtuber watching this will grow 2024🫡🥰
🤖
@@Maskyn18 huh?
I'm a 17 year old beginning UA-camr... I'm shooting for 1k subs by the end of the year 💪🏾
🙌🙌 Can't wait
What about the older ones?😮
Very informative video. Thanks for sharing. Have a great day. 👍847 likes
1.4k view in just an hour🙌 Lord when will I get here🙆♀️
Thank you for this info😊
You will get there❤
@@Vlogandcookwithme Amen🙌🙌♥️ Thank you♥️
How do you check if someone else's UA-cam video is copyrighted????
What about the inshot music ... Does the copyright affect the channel
I haven't received a copyright strike, but how can i check that? Do i get a Massage or something like that?
@@MrBlackCheesus it would be under your video when you post it
@@Phiesyls thanks for the response! Might be useful in the future
Okay you’ve convinced me. I was just going to make my channel an art journal but now I’m going to plan for some educational videos as well as I have some ideas that I’ve been bouncing around in my head. Btw if anyone is wondering I do not intend to teach art on my channel. That’s been overdone and at this point in art side of UA-cam there are so many people selling shovels that it’s hard to see the actual mines.
Nice share
I heard that a lots of people who makes music get copyright claims on their music. Sometimes even big music companies (upload services) are behind those false claims. But they win in the end. How to prevent that?
One time, one of my favorite UA-camrs got false copyright claims from a channel who was banned from a game for cheating that the youtuber used to post videos of, so they would try to get channels that made vids on that game taken down. Couple days later, the youtuber who got false copyright claims had their channel taken down, later that day they got back up, and I just checked, and the youtuber who gave the false copyright claims got their channel deleted.
If a channel produced 4 separate video tutorials with all original content… later makes a condensed montage into a new highlights video would that be ineligible reused content ???? Thanks to anyone who responds
This would be fine, you're re-purposing your own content into a new format.
@@vidIQ great 😊
So do shorts have copyright? I’m not sure
12:13 a question about that
UA-cam says that when this Copyright Match Tool found new matches in UA-cam Studio they will send bell notifications but i don't receive any notifications while the Tool is finding matches alot of times
I don't understand what happened
Cau ya help me please 🙏 😢
Thanks 😊
Maybe check your notifications are setup correctly to receive copyright matches. Otherwise, contact YT support through the studio dashboard (if you are monetized).
@@vidIQ where do I check this?
sir vidiq buy nhi ho rha hai kese upgrade kru plz help
This whole copyright "claim" issue is ridiculous. I get a "copyright" on some of my videos even when I give full, complete credit information for the music in my description box. I never get a strike, only a claim. I think UA-cam is trying to force people to use the music from their library. That's okay if the music is not especially pertinent but only for background purposes. But when the music is pertinent to the content, I think it's coercive and I'm going to leave the music in the video with credit info as I've been doing. I'm not going to waste my time when I'm following UA-cam's own guidelines.
I just my first claim and didn't know what it ment😂. Perfect timing
You honestly should only use the "remove song" feature. No risks, no problems, no big affect on your video. Gets back the monetisation, and you will get money, never give up 🚩
Brother, I have a question that if I delete the blocked and copyrighted video, then the copyright will be removed and there will be no effect on the channel. Please sir, please tell me about this.
Does all this apply to remixing shorts?
Great information. Thank you!
There’s an easy solution. Don’t add music. How much music did you hear on this video? Did you still stay and watch? There you go 😊
4:37 watch here for answers to my questions in comments
If you feel down if you get these just ignore them, use this as a lesson. Dont let a copyright strike slow you down!
I don't get copyright claims but if I use music from Share Factory Studio over the top of game play videos I get copyright issues. They say it's not a "copyright strike" so I don't bother doing anything. If my channel gets bigger I'll hire someone to do that tedious stuff for me, that's the dream.
You can find more information on copyright claims and copyright strikes here:
ua-cam.com/users/shortsjRRKK7kCnhA
ua-cam.com/users/shortskjHao9f3ggQ
ua-cam.com/users/shortsGcMeVYsp9Rc
ua-cam.com/users/shortsiUlUFO9kghQ
ua-cam.com/video/mVc4oW2OVhM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/NhA_WTcMnic/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/bBV80MgmEz8/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/2_o6qLP85rM/v-deo.html
Sir, please explain more about "Re-use content". I am confusing about this issue.
You can find more information on copyright claims and copyright strikes here:
ua-cam.com/users/shortsjRRKK7kCnhA
ua-cam.com/users/shortskjHao9f3ggQ
ua-cam.com/users/shortsGcMeVYsp9Rc
ua-cam.com/users/shortsiUlUFO9kghQ
ua-cam.com/video/mVc4oW2OVhM/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/NhA_WTcMnic/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/bBV80MgmEz8/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/2_o6qLP85rM/v-deo.html
Hi, loved this one, but it made me wonder, what if I am the owner and creator of a video yet someone is trying to claim copyright?!
UA-cam Studio has a channel copyright tab that shows you when people have used your content. When attempting to copyright strike them, you must consider first if their video falls within the domain of "Fair Use".
You can also use this feature to DM the offending party. You could ask for compensation for your work, or whatever you want to let them use your work.
I had this happen with one of my most recent videos. Got an automatic claim from an artist for using their music. Problem is, I didn't use their music. I used a sound clip from a 23 year old video game. The artist that UA-cam flagged as a copyright, sampled that same video games sound clip in their song.
I'm disputing it hard, because if anyone is going to file a claim, i want it to be the person that actually made the original track.
We creating evergreen content with this one 🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🦅🔥🔥🔥
Busted...
i got wrongly copyright claimed. I made indian national anthem (its in public domain btw) i got claimed to some random songwriters . should i dispute?
Thanks for 62subscribers
as someone who makes videos in my niche, i get a lot of copyright claims and i mute the copyrighted sounds. however i don't know if my content is considered fair use. i hope i don't get rejected when aplying for the ypp
Hi, could you make a video on how to gain access to Content ID?
I clicked on some of those before and I thought it was okay just to leave them alone but it looks like I'm going to have to watch your video all the way here and finish watching it and see what I need to do
Thank you Mr 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏👍👍👍👍👍
It’s hard to make music as a musician sometimes I had a copyright on my song…some other musician used the same music that’s royalty free music from my song
I got a copyright claim from a random anime opening channel but i don't even use any song it's in the game it's the main theme of game how do I remove it
As shown in this video, you have options on how to remove it.
@@vidIQ thanks
Is there now (or was there ever) an option to blur out or place a black box over portions of a video’s visuals to remove a claim?
Learning and growing🤞🏻
Sometimes Claims will be evolved or backfired into a strike when a copyrighted video remains very long tho is only a chance
and another chance for a block
Thank you 🙏
Thanks Rob for this crucial info 😊
i did not get monetized because UA-cam felt i had reused content. My show is a paranormal talk show and a lot of the guests I have on are making the rounds of other shows. I am a journalist in real life. I ask them questions and they answer. i am careful about copying anyone's content. The show is broadcast live. I don't know what to do. I guess ill have to find funding elsewhere.
Did I do it wrong? 9:45
If I’m not yet monetized
Should I worry about copyright?
Very fair the reused content is not, because they are only going to comment on it first if you want to be in the youtube program. Before that they did use the same videos to make their own money by showing ads when someone watches those videos, and then when you apply for monitazition they are going to say we won't allow it! Well smart considering they make money from it by showing ads and the owner of the channel is sent hiking.
Ilmu yang sangat penting untuk dilakukan
Thank you so much I appreciate this 💟
Pardon me but I have reached minimum monetisation requirements but YT tells me I need to build channel history.
I have not had any channel strikes... how do I go about this
This is an underrated UA-cam channel
Thanks for the info!
10:36
Does it affect gameplay channels that literally share their gameplay? And what happens to channels that show gameplay shorts?
Talking about copyright, how about videos or shorts, using AI to generate stories, images, scripts, etc. But I always mentioned it in my description for every video. And of course, I always use some of my own scripts. If a company likes you using their tools, it should be allowed because we are also promoting their tools. It's a win-win for both creators and the company. Maybe vidIQ can make a video about this or related if possible. Thanks. 🤔
Hello Fellow UA-camrs ,i have a question Do movie clip/trailer channels get monetized ,because when i tried to upload movie trailer UA-cam says Copyrighted content cannot be monetized .Please help
I started yesterday and i already have over 3000 views and more subscribers than people I know! The shorts get subscribers! I was just joking around had no idea. Put time into planning, i have no idea how to shoot or edit or anything technical but i have my next 10+ videos already planned out. I think it helps a lot if you know what you want it to look like, it will just take a couple shots to get it that way❤❤❤❤
I wish you all the best of luck, may all your dreams come true!!!
Hey VIDIQ 😃👋
I had used music with commercial rights, and content from public places such as pixabay & utube and I keep getting copyrights notification, even strikes; wrongly, even for the music does not fall within copyright and it is not the music claimed by that artist. What to do in this case?
Thanks for another informative video. I got one going for a walk in the woods just the other day. I did do a short cover of a passenger tune and changed the key and and thought the timing was so off, i even got words wrong. I am very laid back about my vids and except clips even if I feel cringe from time to time. Never got a Dylan copyright. I hear people singing their favorite songs online everyday as i adore my music. I am starting to feel i just don't have the UA-cam face like you do. Take Care...🙏🙏
i’m a growing youtuber and this stuff helps because i really want to get big but half the time I don’t know how