None. If not in 1975, Karpov would have beaten him in 1978. End of the story. Now maybe Kasparov's rise would have been belated, but he was every bit as inevitable as Karpov
@@aljiaothats so wrong lmao, bobbys almost always came out better in openings, Karpov was the one trying weird variations in Caro kann with Nc8-Nb6 which no one else played and Keres variation of ruy lopez
Many chess trainers and experts that I met has said to me that Fischer would win against Karpov. It is a big quotestion, due to the fact that Fischer havent played an official match from 1972 to 1975, while Karpov has played on tournaments non-stop, literally. Karpov also said that his winning streaks after 1975, were the cause of his hard preparations for the match with Fischer. So, everything heard and said, I would say it would be kinda 50/50. A tough duel, for sure.
Thats obvious because Karpov was no where close to his peak in 1975 whereas fischer was at his peak, Fischer couldnt even qualify for world championship when he was Karpov' sage
@@QhsjahajwFischer's short term dominance makes him shine for a moment but didn't last long. but I truly believe if he is more stable he will dominate everyone. if he is born in the modern days he will beat everyone else. Just because of how talented he is. I don't think even Magnus is as talented as he is.
@@timber_hearthian8499 thats a big if lmao, thats like saying, if maradona wasnt on drugs he wouldve been better, he is what he is, and nothing more. dont hype him for things he could never do
They're both known for their endgames. Fischer has endgames named after him. Hard to tell who was better at endgames but they had somewhat different styles/approaches.
Fischer had 2785 as his peak rating in 1972, Karpov on the other hand his peak rating was 2780 in 1994 which is a long time after Fischer. Fischer also had one of the highest accuracy in history with 98.4111.
No need to compare by this way It is enough to watch Karpov’s games from 1972 to 1979 There will be sure he was too weak to defeat Fischer Fischer was chess genius Don’t waste your time to compare
So many people wouldn’t have sat on the throne if fischer had stayed
Well said
fax
Fischer to objawienie, wskazał direction 🎉🎉🎉
None. If not in 1975, Karpov would have beaten him in 1978. End of the story. Now maybe Kasparov's rise would have been belated, but he was every bit as inevitable as Karpov
@@nuwandalton nope karpov would have been decimated by fischer .
It’s a shame they didn’t play each other. Karpov has said he would have been a better player had he been able to play Fisher
Middle game fischer
End game karpov
Karpov is known for his endgames
Magnus Carlsen is a lethal combination of karpov and Fisher
-Gary Kasparov
How is Karpov better than Fischer at openings when Bobby spent 14 hours everyday studying theory and games
Fischer wasn't that good at openings cuz he usually win in the middlegame with his creativity.
@@aljiaothats so wrong lmao, bobbys almost always came out better in openings, Karpov was the one trying weird variations in Caro kann with Nc8-Nb6 which no one else played and Keres variation of ruy lopez
Mental strength Fischer, the guy didn't showed up , cmon
Bro didn't even care about the second round and still won
Many chess trainers and experts that I met has said to me that Fischer would win against Karpov. It is a big quotestion, due to the fact that Fischer havent played an official match from 1972 to 1975, while Karpov has played on tournaments non-stop, literally. Karpov also said that his winning streaks after 1975, were the cause of his hard preparations for the match with Fischer. So, everything heard and said, I would say it would be kinda 50/50. A tough duel, for sure.
Thats obvious because Karpov was no where close to his peak in 1975 whereas fischer was at his peak, Fischer couldnt even qualify for world championship when he was Karpov' sage
@@QhsjahajwFischer's short term dominance makes him shine for a moment but didn't last long. but I truly believe if he is more stable he will dominate everyone. if he is born in the modern days he will beat everyone else. Just because of how talented he is. I don't think even Magnus is as talented as he is.
@@timber_hearthian8499 thats a big if lmao, thats like saying, if maradona wasnt on drugs he wouldve been better, he is what he is, and nothing more. dont hype him for things he could never do
@@QhsjahajwMaradona only was in drugs at the finals Years of his carreer.
@@lolproo wrong, he was caught in 1994, he starting using them since 82
Fischer would have been the longest dominant chess player for years if he hadn't gone crazy
если бы да кабы во саду росли грибы
He wasn't crazy. Bro was spitting fax and no one liked it.
@@user-zc9mf3ly5r Before he wasn't, but after becoming world chess champion his mental health started to deteriorate
@@NathanielSam fax dont care about your feelings
@@Laney322 What? Was that supposed to be an insult to me?
Giving Fischer endgame is insane, Karpov is literally known for his endgames
They're both known for their endgames. Fischer has endgames named after him. Hard to tell who was better at endgames but they had somewhat different styles/approaches.
Mentality fischer
It depends lol but great point.
☠
Megalomany mentality?
bro lost to karpov because he didnt show up idk about that one
Karpov was super defensive Fischer was way more aggressive
Winner-drunk magnus
Bobby fisher, is the best chess player ever even better than magnus carlsen
Magnus Carlsen has a higher elo.
LOL 😂😂
@@Sun-gs6hqhigher Elo won't make u stronger
@@JakeHenzo Magnus has more knowledge, as he learns from the past. And with your logic, Paul Morphy is the best player of all time.
Goated vid 🗿
🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
@@aljiao 🗿🗿🗿🗿
Short term dominance is a point ? And in the middle game even Kasparov said that Karpov is the best positional player
Fischer in the middlegame is a beast and matched up with his creativity he is unstoppable
@@aljiaoFischer played like a machine. Creativity was definitely not one of his main characteristics
Bruh mental strenght is bobby
no 😂
Fischers mental isn't that good cuz he quit chess right after he got the world champion title
Didn’t he get crazy at the end chess being the main cause of it? Nah he isn’t mentally strong
No
И в тот момент вспоминаем что Фишер не сыграл против Карпова.
Truth
Bobby Fischer better than anatoly karpov
♟️
Anatoly had better accuracy and elo id say
Fischer had 2785 as his peak rating in 1972, Karpov on the other hand his peak rating was 2780 in 1994 which is a long time after Fischer. Fischer also had one of the highest accuracy in history with 98.4111.
Sorry Fischer had a accuracy of 97.89 and Karpov had a accuracy of 97.61. But still, Fischer had a higher accuracy and elo.
@@aljiao i was considering consistency and longjevity
@@sergejmaher144 I kinda put that in as "the long term domination" one
@@aljiao fisher had aloooot less games and only slight procentage more accuracy, i think karpov takes that
Bobby fihser top 1
Anatoly karpov top 2
Magnus top 3
Profilaxis
No need to compare by this way
It is enough to watch Karpov’s games from 1972 to 1979
There will be sure he was too weak to defeat Fischer
Fischer was chess genius
Don’t waste your time to compare
I mainly just do this for fun
W
Karpov has more experience and he’s max Leo is higher than Fischer
Karpov's highest elo is 2780 while Fischer's is 2785 and achieved 20 years beforehand.
In my opinion if fischer had been for more years he would be unbeatable
Fischer would beat him in 1975.
Dude said that anatoly is better than fischer in openings ☠️
Karpov aggresive? lmao
Yes he was. Aggressive doesn't mean tactical
xin vdeo
Nice edit
ty
Both > Carlsen
Nah
Karpov w
Bobby American jimic only. one year champion. Below avg player
how? 💀
I doubt you can name any player that’s not extremely popular.
¿Eso lo mide a IA?
the 1v1 battle edit?