Not in the sense of string theory, but more radically, I have no reason to believe reality has to be describable all in just one "framework", so why not, it seems reasonable to me. Let there be an infinity of universes.
I think it will be cool if we ever start to actually be able to find things like that out. I'm rooting for us to do it for sure! Brian, your awesome! I really like who you are and the world is a better place with you in it.
I do not think our physical, noticeable universe is all there is. Instead, I see it as a compartment within reality itself, which includes additional dimensions and possibly more compartments. This is not exactly the same as believing in a multiverse.
This theory explains how the big bang and the photons from the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation can represent the beginning of our time line within a dynamic infinite Universe. And how the cosmological arrow of time with the Universe expanding from the big bang into the future is based on the same geometrical process that forms the concept of time that we have in our everyday life.
Dr. Keating....There was a "big bang" when I dropped the pot lid on the marble floor just now. Did that act spawn a new universe I wonder? Thanks for your great video presentations. Cheers
I learned from a great philosopher and teacher this very simple edict. If it happened once it can happen again. Also, it wasn't A big bang, there was a big bang and it's still going on, it has not stopped banging. We are just a part of the pattern, way out on the end of a spiral arm of the pattern. In an average size galaxy, according to what we can see. We, our special place and privileges in the pattern is to be able to recognize it and share our knowledge and love with our family, friends, neighbors, and the universe itself.
Eric lerner says in his book" the big bang never happened", the universe is nothing more than a cosmic energy grid, I believe as he does, the universe extends to infinity, and has always been in existance, no big bang, no creation, no beginning, no end. Just galaxies forming and unforming over and over forever, 😊
The universe is most likely a finite crystal-like ball of semi-quantised, close-packed +ve and -ve particles tightly bonded to form neutral field cells, with a finite, total amount of +ve and -ve charge. A matter formation then gravitational congregation event (most likely from a Big Hit from another universe) split cells into electrons (e) and positrons (p) and protons (pep) and antiprotons (epe) with electrons and positrons left over as there are always exactly the same number of electrons and positrons in the universe. -- The Antimatter Catastrophe was avoided as sometimes proton (pep) and muon (ep_e = malformed anti-proton) pairs were formed, and more-so than antiproton (epe) + antimuon (pe_p) pairs so it's a matter rather than antimatter universe. Matter formation and congregation concentrates universe charge from voids to matter, so voids expand and matter-containing field contracts. Black hole growth accelerates void expansion... NO QUARKS, Dark Matter, Higgs Field, maybe even neutrinos. These are modern day epicycles. -- Gravity and part of the Strong Force is surrounding, empty field trying to stay balanced locally (equidistant fields cells), repelling matter (field imbalances) from all directions. Magnetic Field is polarised (partially split) field cells, spin is a particle's centre polarisation axis, energy levels are polarised field cell spheres, light is a transverse cell movement wave with polarisation wave at 90'.
Hi Brian, what is the status of the CMB pol measurements at the Simons Observatory? Have you set a new upper limit for the tensor/scalar ratio? Neutrino masses?
The universe is almost like a huge expanding blanket, sometimes the parts of this blanket tear and generate energy, this mass is super hot and is dumped into the inner quantum foam and in the process a lot of elements are created, add so many billions of years and hyper gravity and there you have a universe
Measurements of the universe indicate it’s flat and thus an Infinite Universe. The Big Bang universe expansion is at a constant velocity. The acceleration component is the gravitational pull of the infinite universe on the Big Bang universe. Recent work on black holes suggest they are chaotic and unstable. I don’t see any reason a large enough black hole can become a big bang. Also no one seems to believe that a singularity exists at the heart of a black hole. This would remove the need for inflation at the Big Bang.
The multiverse is just too byzantine, inelegant and ultimately unobservable (like a unicorn on Uranus) for my sensibility, plus it defies the principle of Occam's Razor. Maybe this is not definitive, but for me it's a Genesis uni-verse.
The simulation makes us think so with our observations but we are in a position where the real story is in the programming, not our physical world. Imho
information entropy of the original universe (≈ 1×10^123 bits) = ((2 bits L_☉ Sun's age^2)/(c/(pi×10^51 meter/s^2))/eV) It was a 180° that made a big bang to Let There Be Light.
We have evidence (nucleosynthesis) for a time when the universe was about as dense as a neutron star, a few minutes after the possible singularity. I could be wrong but I don't think we have anything before that. It's quite possible that some kind of bounce took place long before the singularity, or that the universe wasn't created infinitely (or Planck) dense. Actually a fun thought, maybe the Big Bang ran through the universe from one side to the other, making one side a little cooler, and we interpret it as the Earth's motion relative to CMB. I wonder if precise measurement of CMB can distinguish between the two.
I believe in a big bang but not the one from classic physics, also not inflation, but its still a big bang. Start pondering what infinite realy means can you have then unity behind all? Nope as an inf inite system has an infinite information blur, it can only know a finite part of it self bit for bit and not one more!
This is not the truth. Will be good to find a better source of this information. "He" give her only the bank interest of the sum for a while. A load of the blue print of "His" papers has been found to be Milens's handwriting.
Claiming that 'let their be light" is a direct insight into the big bang is totally BS, anceint people thought god started with light before matter does not mean they concived inflation. Genisis also states the earth was created BEFORE the heavens, indicating immedietly that this narritive is incorrect.
Not the best idea to begin a scientific dispute with the wrong form of "there." I'll try to ignore the fact you also managed to misspell ancient, conceived, Genesis, immediately, and narrative. Oof.
The highest form of knowledge in science is laid down as theories. You cannot 'prove' any theory, you can only assemble supporting evidence for any given theory. However, you can overturn any theory by finding evidence that contradicts the theory.
@hansweichselbaum2534 I guess having easy access to so much information is maddening, but amazing ! I often wonder if I had this access in my youth, what may have been, never to late though. thanks ✌️
please invite Jason Lisle (phd in astrophysics from Colorado Boulder U) from Biblical Science Institute. That would be so much more interesting than echo-chamber talks xD
![Our Universe Is A Math Problem! Max Tegmark’s Brilliant Theory of Reality [Ep. 465]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EFO5lzA_0Og/mqdefault.jpg)
Is our Universe all there is or do we live in a Multiverse?
Thank you again! Great talk
Not in the sense of string theory, but more radically, I have no reason to believe reality has to be describable all in just one "framework", so why not, it seems reasonable to me. Let there be an infinity of universes.
I think it will be cool if we ever start to actually be able to find things like that out. I'm rooting for us to do it for sure! Brian, your awesome! I really like who you are and the world is a better place with you in it.
I do not think our physical, noticeable universe is all there is. Instead, I see it as a compartment within reality itself, which includes additional dimensions and possibly more compartments. This is not exactly the same as believing in a multiverse.
It's all one universe afaic!
I teach high school astronomy. I have enjoyed following your videos. I have usually following your videos and Dr. Becky's lately.
Is harder to get into a mid level high school in the UK than it is an IVY league social conditioning centre
This theory explains how the big bang and the photons from the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation can represent the beginning of our time line within a dynamic infinite Universe. And how the cosmological arrow of time with the Universe expanding from the big bang into the future is based on the same geometrical process that forms the concept of time that we have in our everyday life.
Dr. Keating....There was a "big bang" when I dropped the pot lid on the marble floor just now. Did that act spawn a new universe I wonder? Thanks for your great video presentations. Cheers
nowadays we call it freak-off. and there were many
I learned from a great philosopher and teacher this very simple edict. If it happened once it can happen again.
Also, it wasn't A big bang, there was a big bang and it's still going on, it has not stopped banging.
We are just a part of the pattern, way out on the end of a spiral arm of the pattern. In an average size galaxy, according to what we can see.
We, our special place and privileges in the pattern is to be able to recognize it and share our knowledge and love with our family, friends, neighbors, and the universe itself.
Yes, perpetual, never-ending banging goin' on.
(44:44) Fourth row back, fifth from left; Brian you handsome Cosmologist!
Eric lerner says in his book" the big bang never happened", the universe is nothing more than a cosmic energy grid, I believe as he does, the universe extends to infinity, and has always been in existance, no big bang, no creation, no beginning, no end. Just galaxies forming and unforming over and over forever, 😊
The universe is most likely a finite crystal-like ball of semi-quantised, close-packed +ve and -ve particles tightly bonded to form neutral field cells, with a finite, total amount of +ve and -ve charge. A matter formation then gravitational congregation event (most likely from a Big Hit from another universe) split cells into electrons (e) and positrons (p) and protons (pep) and antiprotons (epe) with electrons and positrons left over as there are always exactly the same number of electrons and positrons in the universe.
--
The Antimatter Catastrophe was avoided as sometimes proton (pep) and muon (ep_e = malformed anti-proton) pairs were formed, and more-so than antiproton (epe) + antimuon (pe_p) pairs so it's a matter rather than antimatter universe. Matter formation and congregation concentrates universe charge from voids to matter, so voids expand and matter-containing field contracts. Black hole growth accelerates void expansion... NO QUARKS, Dark Matter, Higgs Field, maybe even neutrinos. These are modern day epicycles.
--
Gravity and part of the Strong Force is surrounding, empty field trying to stay balanced locally (equidistant fields cells), repelling matter (field imbalances) from all directions. Magnetic Field is polarised (partially split) field cells, spin is a particle's centre polarisation axis, energy levels are polarised field cell spheres, light is a transverse cell movement wave with polarisation wave at 90'.
Eric Lerner and Hugh Ross will enjoy this! Lol
So 8 minutes in and nothing about the big bang yet. Enough already! Get to the meat.
Well wouldn't the big bang have happened when my existence began
Hi Brian, what is the status of the CMB pol measurements at the Simons Observatory? Have you set a new upper limit for the tensor/scalar ratio? Neutrino masses?
Did the Inflation reduction act of 2022 help slow it down a bit?
The universe is almost like a huge expanding blanket, sometimes the parts of this blanket tear and generate energy, this mass is super hot and is dumped into the inner quantum foam and in the process a lot of elements are created, add so many billions of years and hyper gravity and there you have a universe
Nice. but audio quality is soooo baddd......
Measurements of the universe indicate it’s flat and thus an Infinite Universe. The Big Bang universe expansion is at a constant velocity. The acceleration component is the gravitational pull of the infinite universe on the Big Bang universe.
Recent work on black holes suggest they are chaotic and unstable. I don’t see any reason a large enough black hole can become a big bang. Also no one seems to believe that a singularity exists at the heart of a black hole. This would remove the need for inflation at the Big Bang.
Cognitive inflation rate since Hubble is a parallel concept in Quantum. Linguistics
Both
Big Bang model is utter nonsense
How so?
The multiverse is just too byzantine, inelegant and ultimately unobservable (like a unicorn on Uranus) for my sensibility, plus it defies the principle of Occam's Razor. Maybe this is not definitive, but for me it's a Genesis uni-verse.
❤ Uranus 😂
👽 Probe 🔪
The simulation makes us think so with our observations but we are in a position where the real story is in the programming, not our physical world. Imho
It wasn’t a bang, it was a giggle; hence the ripples.
information entropy of the original universe (≈ 1×10^123 bits) = ((2 bits L_☉ Sun's age^2)/(c/(pi×10^51 meter/s^2))/eV) It was a 180° that made a big bang to Let There Be Light.
Multiverse theory does not cocern on Hubble tension
If the microwave background isn't the echoes of the biggest bang that has ever been, then wtf is it?
The CMB is the glow of the distant galaxies of the endless Universe behind the range of the visible light.
We have evidence (nucleosynthesis) for a time when the universe was about as dense as a neutron star, a few minutes after the possible singularity. I could be wrong but I don't think we have anything before that. It's quite possible that some kind of bounce took place long before the singularity, or that the universe wasn't created infinitely (or Planck) dense.
Actually a fun thought, maybe the Big Bang ran through the universe from one side to the other, making one side a little cooler, and we interpret it as the Earth's motion relative to CMB. I wonder if precise measurement of CMB can distinguish between the two.
Cuomo bridge, it’s still called the Tapan Zee pretty much by everyone
The ol' in-out
Classical astrology is the beginning of science. Astrology does not mean horoscope.
Something coming from nothing makes no sense to me.
Most don’t suggest from nothing
I believe in a big bang but not the one from classic physics, also not inflation, but its still a big bang. Start pondering what infinite realy means can you have then unity behind all? Nope as an inf
inite system has an infinite information blur, it can only know a finite part of it self bit for bit and not one more!
Im nine mins and no mention of why there was a big bang cmon man you beat around the bush a tad too much sometimes!
Please don't adhere to the imaginary Redshift. There are far more sane explanations for what you observe.
Funny story about Einstein, he gave his nobel prize money to his wife so she would give him a divorce so that he could marry his cousin.
This is not the truth. Will be good to find a better source of this information. "He" give her only the bank interest of the sum for a while. A load of the blue print of "His" papers has been found to be Milens's handwriting.
Claiming that 'let their be light" is a direct insight into the big bang is totally BS, anceint people thought god started with light before matter does not mean they concived inflation. Genisis also states the earth was created BEFORE the heavens, indicating immedietly that this narritive is incorrect.
BS?? Lol why would you use swear words to talk about this hahaha
Not the best idea to begin a scientific dispute with the wrong form of "there." I'll try to ignore the fact you also managed to misspell ancient, conceived, Genesis, immediately, and narrative. Oof.
There was none
I wish someone would write cosmology book on what we know to be factual
The highest form of knowledge in science is laid down as theories. You cannot 'prove' any theory, you can only assemble supporting evidence for any given theory. However, you can overturn any theory by finding evidence that contradicts the theory.
@hansweichselbaum2534 I guess having easy access to so much information is maddening, but amazing !
I often wonder if I had this access in my youth, what may have been, never to late though. thanks ✌️
Not cosmology but physical math. Roger Penrose. Road to reality.
There is only one rare book on this subject - "Theory of Everything in Physics and the Universe"
The book would have no pages or words.
please invite Jason Lisle (phd in astrophysics from Colorado Boulder U) from Biblical Science Institute. That would be so much more interesting than echo-chamber talks xD
I have Venus as about 700 Billion years old. So no big bang.
ba;dw
It looks like the physics community lost the script.😢
yes or no