That @ didn't rule correctly on the first case. He was trespassing because he was not invited to the party. She just didn't like the pltf and wanted to help out the def. 🙄
The neighbor case was a bad judgment. Defendant should’ve paid it all but she should have at least split since she acknowledged he was in the wrong too. If I was the plaintiff, that 8pm agreement would be off.
That first plaintiff is my worst nightmare neighbor. Also, it's nice to see Judge Lake on a different show. I enjoyed her on Paternity Court, but sometimes those litigants made me want to throw something at my computer screen.
Drummer Drama: At the very least, they should have had to split the cost. There's no way the uninvited neighbor shouldn't have to pay something !!! That's a crap judgement, IMO. Running the Green: She didn't really try to sue her for that, did she? Stop it ...
I disagree with the neighbour judgement. The defendant should have shared in the cost. He didn’t have to replug it, when he didn’t know what he was doing. Going forward loud music every night and after 8pm.
I drive stoned since 2010(age 20) when I first started smoking weed…I’m more observant on weed than sober lol 😂 Plus weed controls my au(tis)m as well ❤
his is a bullshit judgement , the defendant should have had to pay . he shouldn't have invited his self on to the neighbors property . If i were the plaintiff, the defendant would never get any peace after damaging my property and not paying for the damage, i would be playing my music even louder at all hours of the night . the only way he would have peace would be to move ..
The music is about to get louder
I would not have liked that loud music either I sure would not like that no no no no no couldn’t handle that !!
He doesn’t have the right to desturb. The people s privacy
#case 1 Bad Ruling
I agree
I don’t know why people just don’t play their music at a decent volume and have partied ELSEWHERE! Nuisances and disturbances of the peace!
Why would he party somewhere else when he is having a housewarming? It’s a party for the house
Case #2 They Both are Beautiful 🥰😍🥰
That @ didn't rule correctly on the first case. He was trespassing because he was not invited to the party. She just didn't like the pltf and wanted to help out the def. 🙄
The neighbor case was a bad judgment. Defendant should’ve paid it all but she should have at least split since she acknowledged he was in the wrong too. If I was the plaintiff, that 8pm agreement would be off.
That first plaintiff is my worst nightmare neighbor.
Also, it's nice to see Judge Lake on a different show. I enjoyed her on Paternity Court, but sometimes those litigants made me want to throw something at my computer screen.
I respectfully DISAGREE!
Paternity Court had WAY MORE SUBSTANCE THAN THIS “WE THE PEOPLE” and these lame cases with hired ACTORS AND ACTRESSES 🤦🏾♀️
Bro trespassed
Drummer Drama: At the very least, they should have had to split the cost. There's no way the uninvited neighbor shouldn't have to pay something !!! That's a crap judgement, IMO.
Running the Green: She didn't really try to sue her for that, did she? Stop it ...
I disagree with the neighbour judgement. The defendant should have shared in the cost. He didn’t have to replug it, when he didn’t know what he was doing. Going forward loud music every night and after 8pm.
He was being courteous I think
I agree
The man with the music. Stop 🛑
FOLKS, THE WORD IS "TAKEN"! There is no such word as "tooken" (even spell check doesn't recognize the word tooken. )! 🙄
Lol, is that true? I had liketed you before you tooked my word away.
First time I see this show, Don’t like this show i will keep watching judge judy
Bye!
Watch both
Both cases are just ridiculous 😅😂😂 wasted the judge's time...both plantiff From the first And second case are just a waste of time 😂😂
Suing people when it is totally your fault lol
I drive stoned since 2010(age 20) when I first started smoking weed…I’m more observant on weed than sober lol 😂
Plus weed controls my au(tis)m as well ❤
his is a bullshit judgement , the defendant should have had to pay . he shouldn't have invited his self on to the neighbors property . If i were the plaintiff, the defendant would never get any peace after damaging my property and not paying for the damage, i would be playing my music even louder at all hours of the night . the only way he would have peace would be to move ..