Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Wanna know how Quantum Physics and HINDUISM are linked?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2023
  • Main Channel: / scienceisdope
    Free Pseudoscience Game - Spot the BS: bingobaker.com...
    Biases and Fallacies:
    docs.google.co...
    One-time support:
    UPI: scienceisdope@icici
    buymeacoffee.c...
    Patreon: / scienceisdope_
    To join my WhatsApp community: nas.io/science...
    Discord: / discord
    Subbreddit: / scienceisdope

КОМЕНТАРІ • 242

  • @lahsunsingh2005
    @lahsunsingh2005 7 місяців тому +143

    Only sane channel in india..every other ytuber is trying to find science in hinduism...like trying to find rajma in cholle chawal.

    • @Comicscene.7289
      @Comicscene.7289 7 місяців тому +5

      Only sane na there are lot chanel making education video

    • @madishdwivedi5600
      @madishdwivedi5600 7 місяців тому +6

      Vimoh too😊

    • @b048peyyettipavankartikpra4
      @b048peyyettipavankartikpra4 7 місяців тому +6

      you would be surprised to see in chhattisgarh they put rajma in chhole chawal.. just pointing this fun contradiction out

    • @sk....3049
      @sk....3049 7 місяців тому +3

      😂😂😂

    • @ronak653
      @ronak653 7 місяців тому +7

      @lahsunsingh2005 @PranavRadhakrishnan I think Its only because most of the people are theists in our country in addition to that our population is very large, so no. of people who are theists is greater. So its majority vs very low numbered minority who thinks like him and people are easy to manipulate because spiritual aspect gives easy reasons to understand and people tend to believe because they don't want go in deeper analysis. some easy co-relation is enough to manipulate them. it keeps them into bubble of theism and they can't think beyond that

  • @jediknight8738
    @jediknight8738 7 місяців тому +45

    Misinformation se darr nahi lagta
    Confidence se darr lagta hai

  • @MG-qu9ig
    @MG-qu9ig 7 місяців тому +49

    Pranav actually expects these clowns to be somewhat smart & challenging everytime, which they never will 😅

  • @Genie890
    @Genie890 7 місяців тому +22

    From the way she is speaking it is clear that she has at best popular science level idea of physics. Give her a chalk and ask her to go to the black board to solve a college or university level problem in physics ... she will just drop down and play dead.

  • @meghanak9528
    @meghanak9528 7 місяців тому +30

    @pranav - 😂 Your genuine frustration towards the half knowledged arguments is insanely sane.

  • @tariq_sharif
    @tariq_sharif 7 місяців тому +14

    It is going to blow this lady's mind when she realises her nose has been fine-tuned for her glasses ... wow ...

    • @RR_theproahole
      @RR_theproahole 7 місяців тому

      As someone who is suffering from wisdom tooth pain, nothing makes me angrier than this "Our body is designed so perfectly!" argument

  • @vimohlive
    @vimohlive 7 місяців тому +21

    When you set out to prove Hinduism is quantum physics-friendly but end up making the same old classical fine-tuning argument.

  • @siddhantDevansh99677
    @siddhantDevansh99677 7 місяців тому +16

    She is confused between Einstein bhor and heisenbrg and even schrodinger theory...teenagers new sanatanies are happy what she is talking

  • @heybro345
    @heybro345 7 місяців тому +21

    1:54 that expression 😂

  • @divyam432
    @divyam432 7 місяців тому +13

    Bro is fighting world war 64 alone

  • @mainakjana6903
    @mainakjana6903 7 місяців тому +27

    I lost it when she misrepresented anthropic principal. Like, anthropic principal is the thing which is used to debunk fine tuning argument. This one principle destroys her whole career, and she is trying to use it in her own argument somehow? Mind boggling😂😂😂

  • @barnaliadhikary9421
    @barnaliadhikary9421 7 місяців тому +14

    I was noticing her face was full of confident joy while talking about these things... Really people can find so much solace and happiness in living a misguided life or being inside delusional bubble 😑😑🤷🏻‍♀️

    • @spuriusscapula4829
      @spuriusscapula4829 7 місяців тому +2

      Religion is a drug plus much more.

    • @mohit_10
      @mohit_10 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@spuriusscapula4829 religion isn't a problem, people using religion to sell their ideas, glorifying their ego over others is the problem

    • @spuriusscapula4829
      @spuriusscapula4829 7 місяців тому +3

      @@mohit_10 nah religion is definitely a problem. It sets arbitrary boundaries to thinking.

    • @mahikdm
      @mahikdm 7 місяців тому

      Yes ignorance is bliss ....but she is getting more than that here which will not be very graceful to write in here😅

    • @thegodbutcher1
      @thegodbutcher1 7 місяців тому

      "Religion is the opium of the masses"
      -Karl Marx

  • @shailendradas1661
    @shailendradas1661 7 місяців тому +17

    Some People think ancient Hindu text has all the knowledge of the multiverse 😂

    • @rverma7232
      @rverma7232 7 місяців тому +3

      Multiverse is philosophical notion so hindu scriptures did mention Multiverse

    • @padhlekyakarrhahaituyahanp1011
      @padhlekyakarrhahaituyahanp1011 7 місяців тому

      ​@@rverma7232multiverse is marvel fiction. Science doesn't support it. Because it does not have any evidence

    • @bingus6264
      @bingus6264 7 місяців тому

      @@rverma7232are you an idiot?

    • @castario_
      @castario_ Місяць тому

      ​@@rverma7232But still is backwards in science... couldn't protect themselves...

  • @0_truthseeker
    @0_truthseeker 7 місяців тому +15

    Why these guys are so eagerly want their religion to take validation from Science....this means that science is greater than religion even they think so

  • @sudhanvakashyap297
    @sudhanvakashyap297 7 місяців тому +7

    festival of Bharat partners are The Ministry of Tourism, The Art of Living and The Indian Debating Union,so not surprising,AYUSH first now this...

  • @sonuaryan5287
    @sonuaryan5287 7 місяців тому +13

    I think once again India will never start quantum physics in reality and just chanting about how quantum mechanics is our religion which is bshit. Once again we left over in new era again. Hope some scientists doing great.

  • @tatakaetatakae9959
    @tatakaetatakae9959 7 місяців тому +25

    Aunty - God is outside our observable universe.
    Me - Aayein.

    • @manojoy6913
      @manojoy6913 7 місяців тому +5

      Me - kon ghuma ke laya apko wahan aunty ji 😂

    • @thegodbutcher1
      @thegodbutcher1 7 місяців тому

      Baigan 🍆

    • @tatakaetatakae9959
      @tatakaetatakae9959 7 місяців тому

      @@manojoy6913 sarcasm hai bhai 😅

    • @mr.gamerkabir8142
      @mr.gamerkabir8142 7 місяців тому

      no jokes but this is a good argument which can be used by theist

    • @manojoy6913
      @manojoy6913 7 місяців тому

      @@tatakaetatakae9959 are AAPKO nahi 🙏 unhi aunty ji ko bola 🤣

  • @choudhurysaheb8326
    @choudhurysaheb8326 7 місяців тому +3

    The Festival Of Bharat channel again 😅😂

  • @sk....3049
    @sk....3049 7 місяців тому +4

    You and science journey doing great

  • @subhadeepghosh3961
    @subhadeepghosh3961 7 місяців тому +8

    Kaha milega aisa content?
    -Kunal Kamra

  • @YawningforReason
    @YawningforReason 7 місяців тому +6

    Bang bang zamana bole bang bang 😢😢😢 hence proved Big Bang was in Sanatan Dharma

  • @the...devil..
    @the...devil.. 7 місяців тому +13

    How do these people even clear their ssc 😂😂😂😂 aare itna wrong assumptions

    • @日本語大好き
      @日本語大好き 7 місяців тому +1

      Are yeh 1st class kaise pass hue hai yeh pucho 😂 10th to Durr ki baat hai

    • @haragopal1
      @haragopal1 7 місяців тому

      There's tons of scientists who believe in God.. LoL

    • @日本語大好き
      @日本語大好き 7 місяців тому +2

      @@haragopal1 does that make it real? a scientist can have beliefs but that shouldn't break scientific temperament like this people do.

    • @dte.introvert9311
      @dte.introvert9311 7 місяців тому

      ​@@日本語大好き i don't get the logic of 😂 yours God is something you can't prove neither disprove can you provide me the evidence that God doesn't exist

    • @haragopal1
      @haragopal1 7 місяців тому +2

      @@日本語大好き newton believes in god and Einstein dont believe in god.....
      just bcoz you believe in god doesn't mean you are as smart as newton.... just bcoz you rejected god doesn't mean you are einstien....
      it's their choice .. so calm down... instead of judging someone bcoz of their beliefs

  • @rishabhtripathi3859
    @rishabhtripathi3859 7 місяців тому +13

    Make a video explaining Young’s double slit. Some people relate it to God or consciousness

    • @itsoblivion8124
      @itsoblivion8124 7 місяців тому

      Consiousness is not only reason for wave function collapse

    • @bhuvaneshs.k638
      @bhuvaneshs.k638 7 місяців тому

      Wavelet collapses when someone observes. It doesn't mean conscious observer. It means any kind of measurement. Measurement at the end of the day sone kind of physical interaction to extract data

    • @itsoblivion8124
      @itsoblivion8124 7 місяців тому

      @@bhuvaneshs.k638 quantum decoherence is another reason for wave function collapse.

    • @0_truthseeker
      @0_truthseeker 7 місяців тому

      It was named god to make it interesting and viral across world

    • @bhuvaneshs.k638
      @bhuvaneshs.k638 7 місяців тому

      @@itsoblivion8124 decoherence is the name of the phenomenon. The act of wave collapse is called decoherence
      It's not the reason why it collapses.
      It might be due to time decay or measurements/ interractions

  • @PTSD..
    @PTSD.. 7 місяців тому +4

    Her research is based on a 9th standard physics textbook. 🤣

    • @whykoks
      @whykoks 7 місяців тому +1

      Not even that

  • @tariq_sharif
    @tariq_sharif 7 місяців тому +3

    Why is the lady conducting the interview (britihs accent) just sitting there nodding ?

  • @damn7637
    @damn7637 7 місяців тому +4

    Bro your opinion on government's broadcast bill?

  • @Viki-zo1bc
    @Viki-zo1bc 4 місяці тому +1

    Man I can imagine what a frustrating situation Pranav was in.

  • @ankur20010
    @ankur20010 7 місяців тому +2

    The professor is wrong about entropy (even 12th-class student knows who studied physics). She is very confused between what is the system in the laws of thermodynamics. The entropy of the whole system increases. But we can reduce the entropy of some part of it at the expense of increasing it in other parts of the system. So if you launch a rocket, for sure you are reducing the entropy but you are increasing the entropy of its surroundings. But you won't notice as the surroundings is immense. How did she even receive her Ph.D.?

    • @parth7300
      @parth7300 7 місяців тому

      In the world of theoretical physics, her degree is hypothetical

  • @dhananjaydagaonkar
    @dhananjaydagaonkar 7 місяців тому +4

    Why not a video on Existence of Ram and Krishna????

    • @jewelsofjuly7377
      @jewelsofjuly7377 7 місяців тому +9

      I am pretty sure people will go nuts on that topic

    • @dte.introvert9311
      @dte.introvert9311 7 місяців тому

      Are sort of f or something he wants to criticize people who makes these content linking science with religion he doesn't have any problem with religion atleast be logical thats why people of this channel are not some sort rational thinker but just blind hater😂

    • @amangupta-rz7hn
      @amangupta-rz7hn 7 місяців тому +1

      Very risky topic for sure😂😂😅

    • @mr.gamerkabir8142
      @mr.gamerkabir8142 7 місяців тому

      Because he can't make one?
      And is also a coward?

    • @Zeus-7778
      @Zeus-7778 7 місяців тому +3

      Well currently they don't exist

  • @gbap9787
    @gbap9787 7 місяців тому +1

    Woman on the left has left her consciousness already

  • @amangupta-rz7hn
    @amangupta-rz7hn 7 місяців тому +4

    Word salad 🥗😂😂

    • @mr.gamerkabir8142
      @mr.gamerkabir8142 7 місяців тому

      Word salad wouldn't be appreciated by Schrodinger Sagan Oppenheimer Nietzsche Hegel schoppenhauer Vivekananda and a lot more
      A random internet troll now knows more than these guys
      Wow

    • @amangupta-rz7hn
      @amangupta-rz7hn 7 місяців тому +2

      @@mr.gamerkabir8142 yeah linduism and its caste/varna system, sati pratha, misogynist, man-made gods and stories, idol worship, curses, prayers of those man-made gods, brahminism, etc 🤣🤣. It has secret knowledge you know🤣🤣. And, those scientists had their personal beliefs but science doesn't work according to those scientists. Many scientists believe in the Bible, Quran or Christ is coming back. Does this mean they are right, no , there is a proper process on this and science does believe in those things. Again, those scientists are not science.Also, Newton believed in a lot of weird things too. But, was he able to prove that no. And, for vivekananda, he got to know at the end. Anyway, I don't believe or follow vivekananda at all. He is no one for me.

  • @murthyadivirk
    @murthyadivirk 3 місяці тому

    You could just quote the anthropic principle when the fine tuning argument comes in. the anthropic principle can be expanded to explain why universe exists, or stars exist or life sustaining planets exist.

  • @LazySock
    @LazySock 7 місяців тому +3

    Miso is back🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @AlokKumar-ls4cs
    @AlokKumar-ls4cs 7 місяців тому +1

    Hi pranav, I want you to make a debunking video on a book known as surya sidhhant in sanatan dharma, that book is related to astronomy and that is said to contain some really genuine calculations and datas about today astronomy, please I request you to make a video on that

    • @seeker7090
      @seeker7090 7 місяців тому

      You make by yourself

  • @sphaleron10
    @sphaleron10 7 місяців тому +2

    This consciousness bullshit is getting on my nerves now.

    • @mr.gamerkabir8142
      @mr.gamerkabir8142 7 місяців тому

      Do you have a better definition for consciousness?

    • @sphaleron10
      @sphaleron10 7 місяців тому

      I just think consciousness is overrated@@mr.gamerkabir8142

    • @Zeus-7778
      @Zeus-7778 7 місяців тому

      You are aware of you surrounding and yourself ​@@mr.gamerkabir8142

  • @bhuvaneshs.k638
    @bhuvaneshs.k638 7 місяців тому +5

    As a Quantum Engineer and who consider myself as a "Right wing". I can definitely tell u theres NO connection between Hindusim and QFT. Even there was a urdu poet made a statements which sounds like QM as well but doesn't mean it's true

    • @日本語大好き
      @日本語大好き 7 місяців тому +4

      True. We should take those poets and verses as metaphorically rather than literally. But our people lack common sense buddy.

    • @surajborgave8284
      @surajborgave8284 7 місяців тому +5

      They try to justify there beliefs using science and they also say science is not everything.

    • @bhuvaneshs.k638
      @bhuvaneshs.k638 7 місяців тому +2

      @@surajborgave8284 it's a kind of inferiority complex

  • @amanrawat2508
    @amanrawat2508 7 місяців тому +1

    Its funny they are proving something of quantum level but in reality ancient Indians didn’t even knew about microorganisms.

    • @amangupta-rz7hn
      @amangupta-rz7hn 7 місяців тому +1

      Arrey they were doing Jaadu and stuff leave science alone.

    • @amanrawat2508
      @amanrawat2508 7 місяців тому

      @@amangupta-rz7hn 🤣💀

    • @castario_
      @castario_ Місяць тому

      😹they knew about atom but didn't know about micro organism 😹they knew about electricity but couldn't use it ...they knew so much but 😹but just made it useless

  • @sameensolkar6193
    @sameensolkar6193 7 місяців тому

    Engineer me: How did he get that texas instruments hoodie 🤔?

  • @murthyadivirk
    @murthyadivirk 3 місяці тому

    Whenever someone says quantum mechanics, they must also tell us what other kind of mechanics exist. and where they apply and why. else we already know that they dont know about the other 2 or 4 or 5 different types of mechanics one can study at high school or engineering level.

  • @rishabhthakur8773
    @rishabhthakur8773 7 місяців тому +2

    Universe cannot exist without any observer. So this universe only exist for You a Conscious being. Material reality is an illusion because it cannot exist apart from an observer. Consciousness is fundamental reality.
    -Advait vedant

    • @RR_theproahole
      @RR_theproahole 7 місяців тому +5

      "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
      -Carl Sagan

    • @mr.gamerkabir8142
      @mr.gamerkabir8142 7 місяців тому

      ​@@RR_theproaholedo you need evidence for consciousness?

    • @mr.gamerkabir8142
      @mr.gamerkabir8142 7 місяців тому

      Preaching vedanta here is no less than equal to teaching calculus to a 2nd grade student who hasn't even started algebra yet

    • @rishabhthakur8773
      @rishabhthakur8773 7 місяців тому +2

      @@RR_theproahole Evidence is objective. Vedant talk about subjective. You cannot provide any evidence that you are conscious ( having first person experience) . Only you can know You are Conscious, all other can just assume. Similarly, an objective proof of your subjective truth cannot possible. It is called category error.

    • @mr.gamerkabir8142
      @mr.gamerkabir8142 7 місяців тому

      ​​@@rishabhthakur8773what kind of "objective" evidence do you need?
      At one point vedanta talks about consciousness which becomes objective reality
      Where everyone turns to ONE
      Experiences are subjectives but the destination is no
      Also vedanta describes my own existence as the existence of god
      Universe existence itself is described as the existence of god

  • @Brain_Spy
    @Brain_Spy 7 місяців тому +2

    Bro you are doing such a hard work to make content and spending a lot to make a video and ur previous podcasts, Your subscriber rate is increasing so slow. Promote it more. Also one question my brother asked me seeing your video was , you have a deep knowledge about scientific things, But have u did some master course in science or some source who have a vast knowledge about such updated scientific information. So promote yourself and describe more about who you are for new audience . One more thing. Your Subscribers count are enough for getting any sponsor. If one genre of sponsor are not sponsoring you there are so many genres of sponsor trying to sell a wide variety of things, Dont pesture yourself to for editing and posting one video so much. YOU WILL GET A SPONSOR. I know you are trying to get one. But dont give up searching one.

  • @murthyadivirk
    @murthyadivirk 3 місяці тому

    creation needs a creator can be debunked with the infinte regression argument. If a creator created the universe, such a complex enitity must have evolved somehow. one cant just say the creator always existed.

  • @ramthyagarajan
    @ramthyagarajan 7 місяців тому

    7:22 The human mind has evolved in a way that it is very good at finding patterns example time, season etc. However one must not fall into trap of finding patterns where none exist.
    Creationist fall into this trap. Just because humans do well with idea of purpose doesn’t mean that the universe has to have a purpose.
    Changing the universal constants would result into a different universe- that’s it.

  • @KTS137
    @KTS137 7 місяців тому +3

    yeah react to the whole video

  • @mayursawant111
    @mayursawant111 7 місяців тому +2

    The pseudoscience that this lady is spewing with her calm composure is very concerning. People tend to easily believe in people with such calmness instead of an energetic person.

  • @milli3leven377
    @milli3leven377 7 місяців тому +1

    Kaha milega aisa content -Kunal Kamra

  • @gr8sparty
    @gr8sparty 7 місяців тому +1

    Cat owners jealous at the affection your cat shows to you.. 😒

  • @mithunbalaji8199
    @mithunbalaji8199 7 місяців тому +1

    TMM makes a good argument against the fine tuning argument :
    If a omnipotent omniscient entity exists and it intends to create us, then it is logically impossible for life to not exist, no matter different configurations or set up of laws of physics.
    But observation tells us that it is impossible for life to exist, if changes occur in the laws of physics just like the video claims
    Hence, such a entity did not create our universe

    • @mr.gamerkabir8142
      @mr.gamerkabir8142 7 місяців тому

      I didn't understand the argument
      Can you elaborate it further?
      God is the source of life and everything
      God is beyond the perception of time
      So is to observe it is next to impossible

    • @mithunbalaji8199
      @mithunbalaji8199 7 місяців тому

      @@mr.gamerkabir8142
      When the theist claims that the universe is fine tuned for life,
      It implies a creator who had finely tuned the fundamental constants and laws of physics so that it is possible for life to emerge.
      Making such a claim also implies that it is highly improbable for life to emerge without any such fine tuning.
      But a omnipotent, omniscient creator by very nature/definition can create a universe where life can exist no matter the differential configurations of constants and laws of physics itself. In other words there is no need for fine tuning if the creator is omnipotent and omniscient in the first place
      Think angels which are disembodied minds, if such entities can exist no matter how different the laws of physics could become (these entities don't have a corporeal form and are intangible)
      What I mean to say is you cannot claim that the universe is fine tuned by God as an argument since such a god can create Life without any need for fine tuning

    • @mr.gamerkabir8142
      @mr.gamerkabir8142 7 місяців тому

      @@mithunbalaji8199 oh ok
      But the problem is that we don't have a proper understanding of physics
      We are yet to even know even half of this universe
      God might have created another universe where gravity is a repelling force and it can still work as "aliens" could survive their
      Like plants require CO2
      We humans require oxygen
      By this argument
      Plants should also require oxygen?(correct me if I am wrong)

    • @mithunbalaji8199
      @mithunbalaji8199 7 місяців тому

      @@mr.gamerkabir8142
      We cannot perceive how life could possibly exist in world with different laws of nature but God by his very definition can.

    • @mithunbalaji8199
      @mithunbalaji8199 7 місяців тому

      What I intend to say is one cannot use fine tuning as a argument for God since such an entity is all powerful and all knowing can sustain life no matter the physics of the universe there is no need for him to act through the physics of the world to create life
      Bro think angels since they are immaterial beings they don't care about physics this concept is an example how God could create concisous entities without the need of finetuning

  • @punya455
    @punya455 7 місяців тому +2

    How can such institutions be existing with such ‘researchers’ - it must be the reason of existence of our universe… Too many misinterpretations and misrepresentations in one video.

  • @Hassan14003
    @Hassan14003 7 місяців тому +1

    no modern neuro science gives any accepted upon evidence or fundamental explanation of consciousness
    Correction bruh

  • @br0wnbess994
    @br0wnbess994 7 місяців тому

    For the entropy argument, most physics we know breaks down at a singularity so talking about it is meaningless as it is known that are theories fail at that point. Also for any spontaneous process, the entropy of the universe increases. As we are living in an expanding universe, we can safely say that the process was spontaneous. This means that every interval we go back in time, entropy decreases. This however does not mean that it was zero at the point of the big bang. Entropy is naturally low at lower volumes since the number of positional microstates the gas van occupy is low. So any small volume will have a low entropy whether or not a creator made it that way

    • @br0wnbess994
      @br0wnbess994 7 місяців тому +1

      Also measurements can be made by sensors and robots. Concious observer not needed. Some might say the data will be read by humans only, but even if that doesn't happen, let's say it's just stored on a hard disk somewhere, the observation has been made, by a unconscious observer nonetheless

  • @luv8365
    @luv8365 7 місяців тому +1

    anthropic principle n the video ends

  • @aryann899
    @aryann899 7 місяців тому +2

    Even god follow science not magic 🗿

    • @日本語大好き
      @日本語大好き 7 місяців тому

      Waah! 🗿🗿🗿🗿

    • @mr.gamerkabir8142
      @mr.gamerkabir8142 7 місяців тому

      God created science not magic

    • @castario_
      @castario_ Місяць тому

      ​@@mr.gamerkabir8142😹bro thinks science is a religion

  • @MukeshKumar-vx4tt
    @MukeshKumar-vx4tt 7 місяців тому

    These are same points made by creationists like Ken Ham from America. Westerners cite The Bible and she is just citing the Indian Scriptures.

  • @asadansari3341
    @asadansari3341 7 місяців тому +1

    So beautiful

  • @murthyadivirk
    @murthyadivirk 3 місяці тому

    oh crap, she redefined anthropic principle. i give up

  • @gargimandal5992
    @gargimandal5992 7 місяців тому +2

    Bro what is called Vedic Mathematics

    • @harsh9023
      @harsh9023 7 місяців тому +1

      He has a video on that on the main channel.

    • @RR_theproahole
      @RR_theproahole 7 місяців тому

      A book written in the 1960s which has some tricks for arithmetic and which is "Inspired from Vedas".

  • @doorstepcomedy.4178
    @doorstepcomedy.4178 7 місяців тому

    Hi, pranav I've seen your videos, they give a new viewpoint. But I had a question, is Hinduism completely philosophical and spiritual? Is there no scientific temperament and knowledge in Hinduism?
    Please answer.

    • @mr.gamerkabir8142
      @mr.gamerkabir8142 7 місяців тому

      asking an atheist regarding hinduism?

    • @matrixsmarther2325
      @matrixsmarther2325 7 місяців тому

      Philosophical yes, but whether spiritual or not, depends on your world view

    • @MuskanSingh-kw7ux15
      @MuskanSingh-kw7ux15 7 місяців тому +1

      No religion has scientific temperament, that's just not it's domain. Most basic thing in religion is attributing everything to God, without ever trying to find a reason for it.

    • @mr.gamerkabir8142
      @mr.gamerkabir8142 7 місяців тому

      @@MuskanSingh-kw7ux15 really?
      ancient mathematicians from india were hindus or religious
      brahmagupta bhaskaracharya aryabhatta?

    • @MuskanSingh-kw7ux15
      @MuskanSingh-kw7ux15 7 місяців тому +1

      @@mr.gamerkabir8142 I said religion doesn't have a scientific temperament. Religious people can have. These people would have made these discoveries even if they belonged to different religion. It's not the religion which gave them intelligence in these fields.

  • @mahikdm
    @mahikdm 7 місяців тому +1

    WhatsApp Gyan of aunty 😅😅😅

  • @anonymousindian7565
    @anonymousindian7565 7 місяців тому

    Man..., where do these people come from?

  • @Homosapien6666
    @Homosapien6666 7 місяців тому

    Need more cat appearance please

  • @Sankhyame
    @Sankhyame 7 місяців тому

    The emotion is same. Look how Pranav treats his cat, like a child, but it's a cat, an animal. Pet parent? Similarly, those people emotionally think their religion has all the sciences. It's the emotion that drives them not logic or reasoning.

  • @ronak653
    @ronak653 7 місяців тому

    why don't you watch videos at 1.25x, by doing this your video will be shorter and it wouldn't be so fast

  • @morosejourneyman5436
    @morosejourneyman5436 7 місяців тому

    Being BS is lucrative.

  • @morosejourneyman5436
    @morosejourneyman5436 7 місяців тому

    2% variation I say bullshit I say 3%.

  • @rodsingleplatinum5753
    @rodsingleplatinum5753 7 місяців тому

    Don't watch full video they are linked through quantum ranger from power rangers time force

  • @jiteshsharma8306
    @jiteshsharma8306 7 місяців тому

    Drinking challenge: Take a shot every time Pranav does a face palm.😂

  • @shreyasshetty8554
    @shreyasshetty8554 7 місяців тому +1

    Just say she is crazy and move on😂

  • @kurtwagner3059
    @kurtwagner3059 7 місяців тому

    If the universe is so fine-tuned to a certain degree or a fraction, we should be seeing Aliens. They would be visiting our earth like visiting every now and then for a cup of coffee or a large Jamba Juice.

    • @sunilrec85
      @sunilrec85 7 місяців тому

      Excellent presentation Pranav. Very proper explanation.

  • @winwinmilieudefensie7757
    @winwinmilieudefensie7757 7 місяців тому +2

    Waiting on your video about veganisme and the hindu hypocrisy

  • @user-pi9mw3eg5r
    @user-pi9mw3eg5r 7 місяців тому +1

    Please dubbed your video in hindi

  • @vinnytryclyst
    @vinnytryclyst 7 місяців тому

    I would like to state some facts about entropy and the anthropic principle, since I feel they were not properly explained in this video.
    The laws of physics can be broadly divided into two categories: Those that obey time reversal symmetry and those that do not. Newton’s laws of mechanics are an example of the former and the second law of thermodynamics is an example of the latter. For any closed system, equilibrium is the state of the highest probability and entropy is a measure of the deviation from equilibrium. If you start off from a random state, it is equally probable for the system to go to a low entropy state or a high entropy state, thus obeying the time reversal symmetry. But this is not what we observe in the world and the universe at large. We observe a direction of time, a direction in which entropy only increases. This is possible only if the universe started off with a low entropy state, a state which is highly improbable for the universe taken as a closed system. As of now, we don’t know why the universe started off in a highly improbable state. But as Pranav says, postulating the existence of a creator to explain this observation only raises more questions.
    The anthropic principle has broadly two versions, namely the weak and the strong. The strong anthropic principle states that human existence causes the universe to be in a certain way, which is what I think the lady states in this video. The weak anthropic principle says that human existence, or rather, the existence of life is an observed fact and this observation puts certain constraints on the properties of the universe. Both versions of the anthropic principle are scientific, but the strong version is not very useful. The weak version is useful in making predictions and has been used by scientists. The most popular example is the use of the principle by Fred Hoyle to predict resonance in an isotope of carbon, which was later found to be correct. Another example is you can predict that the cosmological constant has to be small but positive since if it is large and negative, then the universe would have collapsed long ago and if it were large and positive, then it would have expanded at a much faster rate, not allowing even stars to form. The anthropic principle is controversial in the scientific community because it is combined sometimes with the multiverse hypothesis, which is unscientific, to explain the values of the fundamental constants we observe in the universe.

  • @Pantheist2602
    @Pantheist2602 7 місяців тому

    3:30
    Sorry dude, there's no convincing evidence for it. Else present it. There's only correlative evidence.
    And correlation doesn't imply causation 😊
    10:55 Better? Like you how you define that word anyway? 😂😂
    Even though whatever she says doesn't make sense and has so many misinterpretations, it doesn't make either sides a win. And your take on Finetuning was way too clichéd. 😂😂

  • @mithunbalaji8199
    @mithunbalaji8199 7 місяців тому

    Came for vedantic stuff disappointed to see classic western thesism 101

  • @thunderbolt5859
    @thunderbolt5859 7 місяців тому

    Why not a video on existence of allah ?🤔🤔

  • @Genie890
    @Genie890 7 місяців тому +2

    "when you travel at the speed of light time itself slows down" ..... this is a typical popular science level rubbish statement often quoted by science junkies who has zero technical knowledge of science.
    Also size of any object is defined by its measured value in its own rest frame. It does not depend on the perspective of an observer.

  • @demonlord1million680
    @demonlord1million680 7 місяців тому +1

    😌😌👌👌

  • @sagaronline265
    @sagaronline265 7 місяців тому

    @2:52,Problem with scientific temper humans is they want everything validated by science which is kind of andhbhakti of so called modern science.
    1]Hindu religion is connected with quantum physics in the sense that it teaches about soul which is quantum energy ,smaller than sub atomic particles,billion time.
    2]yes,there exist a spiritual universe,which is infinite space of golden red light just above infinite physical universe having stars,galaxies etc.meditation is only way to know whether it exist or not as physical science is very limited and not capable to detect something which is infinite & eternal.
    Modern science has no clue about soul or aatma,soul world,spiritual universe,God-The supreme soul and Eternal world Drama of 5000 years.
    @3:37,and when you say people like this and make fun and say you understand and can believe mind exist because of electrochemical reaction shows how dumb and ignorant you are in knowledge of knowing mind.mind is not physical but subtle,it has nothing to do with electrochemical reaction in brain in the sense that these reaction exist because of mind and not the other way round to say that these reaction takes place so mind exist.

    • @smarathe301
      @smarathe301 7 місяців тому +1

      So no proof, just some made up speculation, and we have to believe you ?

    • @mr.gamerkabir8142
      @mr.gamerkabir8142 7 місяців тому

      ​@@smarathe301but is the order of science the last conclusion towards one matter?
      Science can be wrong
      Maybe 100 yrs from now Einstein model would be wrong
      Then?

    • @spuriusscapula4829
      @spuriusscapula4829 7 місяців тому

      @@mr.gamerkabir8142 that is the point of science.

  • @Beastfan1-hu2xy
    @Beastfan1-hu2xy 7 місяців тому

    In hinduism they say" Reality is Maya"
    Science say the same " Reality is a hallucination too but in a sense controlled"

    • @AnarchistDoc
      @AnarchistDoc 7 місяців тому

      When did 'science' said this??

    • @Beastfan1-hu2xy
      @Beastfan1-hu2xy 7 місяців тому

      @AnarchistDoc come on, bro,
      Just read the Wikipedia Max planck
      Not only him every physicist agree that matter does not have existence on its own, it isn't separate from consciousness
      Deep down, it's not things its releations
      It's all fields
      You think you are standing on the ground something solid Sorry mate you are just floating

    • @Beastfan1-hu2xy
      @Beastfan1-hu2xy 7 місяців тому

      @AnarchistDoc also, neuroscientists agree that everything you see ,hear or touch are just fantasies of brain its not like the color red exists on its own
      Brain is making this all up

    • @Beastfan1-hu2xy
      @Beastfan1-hu2xy 7 місяців тому

      @AnarchistDoc So if this reality is also a hallucination then the question is which hallucination is real ?

  • @anamika7051
    @anamika7051 7 місяців тому

    Facepalm