The Falklands War 1982 (Full Documentary)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 січ 2025
  • The Falkland Islands have two names. To the people who live there and to Britain they are the Falkland Islands but to their closest neighbour across the sea Argentina and its people, they are Las Islas Malvinas. The debate over what to call the islands is a symbol of a much larger dispute which has raged for hundreds of years and continues to this day. On the Argentinian side a claim based on territorial integrity and a perceived historical injustice. And on the British side, a claim based on historical precedent and the right to self-determination.
    In April of 1982, that debate became a conflict. One which would take the lives of nearly 1,000 people. But for Argentina, it was never meant to be that way. In fact, when Argentina invaded the Falkland Islands they believed that Britain wouldn't even respond.
    This video is a supercut of a five part series previously posted to this channel.
    A short history of the Falklands conflict: www.iwm.org.uk...
    Licence the clips used in this film: film.iwmcollec...
    CC Attributions:
    HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT DSC by Henry Kellner. CC BY-SA 3.0 creativecommon...
    Washington, White House by Arian Zwegers. CC BY 2.0 creativecommon...
    Government House in Stanley by John5199. CC BY 2.0
    creativecommon...
    The Foreign & Commonwealth Office's main building in Whitehall by UK Government. OGL 2. www.nationalar...
    Map from Free Vector Maps: freevectormaps.com
    Argentina.gob.ar (Gobierno de Argentina), CC BY-SA 4.0
    Skyhawk: www.flickr.com... © Armada Argentina
    Bomb disposal team - Photo courtesy of MCDOA
    Sound effects via ZapSplat
    Music:
    Mount Pleasant images, Crown copyright, April 2022
    Margaret Thatcher images © University of Salford Press Office
    Landmine clearance photos via Safe Lane Global
    Scott Holmes Music - Conclusion
    Kevin MacLeod - Decisions
    Sound effects via ZapSplat
    #war #history #falklandswar

КОМЕНТАРІ • 943

  • @jguth6
    @jguth6 11 місяців тому +545

    It's absolutely incredible that we get this level of content for free on UA-cam! This is such a well made documentary

    • @arostwocents
      @arostwocents 11 місяців тому +11

      It's as free as television where it's taken from, we pay by watching ads

    • @nealbeard1
      @nealbeard1 11 місяців тому

      Use brave browser

    • @pistonburner6448
      @pistonburner6448 11 місяців тому

      Nothing is free. The price is subjecting yourself, your children, all of your society to the horrendously calculating and powerful propaganda and censorship which the clients of Google and Google itself wants to impose on you.

    • @GHOSTGHOST-jw1mi
      @GHOSTGHOST-jw1mi 10 місяців тому +4

      IMO ads kill it. 4 already popped out and it only been a few minutes yea some you can skip. But UA-cam barely had any back then now they are in every single documentary or any video you see ads come out here and there would be ok but every few minutes

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому +2

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

  • @JeffBilkins
    @JeffBilkins 11 місяців тому +191

    When I was young I also initially thought the Falklands are north of Scotland, and it was really confusing that Argentina would invade all the way there.

    • @reluctantheist5224
      @reluctantheist5224 11 місяців тому +11

      You might know already but Falkland is in the county of Fife , North of a town called Glenrothes.That might be where you heard it?

    • @daleyjeeper6188
      @daleyjeeper6188 11 місяців тому +26

      Same when I heard Russian invaded Georgia 🤣

    • @jacksimpson-rogers1069
      @jacksimpson-rogers1069 11 місяців тому +6

      I am an expatriate Scot, US citizen since just after the end of the deadly Vietnam foolishness, and am now appalled at the foolishness of the Edinburgh government in allowing Scotland's wild places to be infested by wind "turbines", instead of displacing fossil fuels the way France did, with civilian nuclear.

    • @reluctantheist5224
      @reluctantheist5224 11 місяців тому +14

      @@jacksimpson-rogers1069 Are you on the right video comments?

    • @jacksimpson-rogers1069
      @jacksimpson-rogers1069 11 місяців тому

      @@daleyjeeper6188 Brilliant!

  • @jam99
    @jam99 8 місяців тому +40

    Great job on clearing up the mines. I was last in the Falklands in 2010 and had no idea that goal would be achieved by 2020. Thank you for the production, IWM.

    • @Pedal2TheMetal
      @Pedal2TheMetal 5 місяців тому +2

      @@jam99 how is it being there? How are the people? I’m legitimately curious

    • @Tobiasu
      @Tobiasu 3 місяці тому

      @@Pedal2TheMetal me too, how was it??

  • @jeffshootsstuff
    @jeffshootsstuff 11 місяців тому +283

    Always nice when the BBC broadcasts the details of your surprise attack hours before LOL

    • @RichRobinson
      @RichRobinson 11 місяців тому +24

      Yeah! Imagine the board meetings that followed after that blunder.

    • @sergeanthowiefromthemainland
      @sergeanthowiefromthemainland 11 місяців тому +50

      Another good reason not to pay the licence fee.

    • @DarrenJamiesonJamieson
      @DarrenJamiesonJamieson 11 місяців тому

      I'd like to point out that even after we'd won Thatcher called it a draw (joint sovereigncy), to appease her UN masters, and this is whence The Freedom of Movement was bourne, the same as Churchill did after WWII (The E.C).
      Now they are handing out nukes to all and sundry.
      I don't think that they like us.

    • @FranzBieberkopf
      @FranzBieberkopf 10 місяців тому +6

      @@sergeanthowiefromthemainland You don't seem bothered that if a politician kept his gob shut, the BBC would have nothing to report.
      Try blaming the leaker-after all, the BBC reporter was only following his example.

    • @50shadesofskittles9
      @50shadesofskittles9 10 місяців тому +8

      @@sergeanthowiefromthemainlandlmao
      I no longer watch the Beeb and won't pay the fee. Netflix, prime and UA-cam will do me.

  • @alphonso391
    @alphonso391 11 місяців тому +77

    What’s fascinating is that it was an Argentine dictator trying to bolster support at home but failing to take into account that he was dealing with a Conservative pm who had nothing left to lose by military action because failure to act would have been political suicide.

    • @marcj3682
      @marcj3682 9 місяців тому +6

      "What’s fascinating is that it was an Argentine dictator trying to bolster support at home but failing to take into account that he was dealing with a Conservative pm who had nothing left to lose by military action because failure to act would have been political suicide."
      The irony of your comment.

    • @santiagoalfaro7855
      @santiagoalfaro7855 2 місяці тому

      Un dictador que creyó en el disparate de esta aventura por haber servido a los yankies en su plan cóndor y estos lo iban ayudar en esto... Pero el gorila de Galtieri se le pasó por alto el acuerdo de la otan. Saludos de lo que queda de Argentina.

    • @Scion3Sevens
      @Scion3Sevens День тому

      @@marcj3682 cute, but no sale

    • @lewis123417
      @lewis123417 14 годин тому +1

      ​@@marcj3682correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't thatcher elected in a democracy 3 times?

  • @natebartels1444
    @natebartels1444 11 місяців тому +117

    I wish HMS Invincible had been saved as a museum instead of being scrapped.

    • @slicedchicken4806
      @slicedchicken4806 10 місяців тому

      don't you guys have hms belfast?@boxlabs

    • @jdb47games
      @jdb47games 9 місяців тому +2

      @boxlabs There are several RN ships in existence built before 1945.

    • @jdb47games
      @jdb47games 9 місяців тому +1

      Who do you imagine is going to pay for that?

    • @sulyokpeter3941
      @sulyokpeter3941 7 місяців тому +5

      I wish HMS Conqueror had been saved as a museum submarine instead of HMS Courageous. Because HMS Conqueror was the 1st nuclear-powered submarine that sank a warship. Yes, yes same class but HMS Conqueror is the one that sank the General Belgrano during the Falknaks War.

    • @nphil93992
      @nphil93992 5 місяців тому

      @@jdb47games well, we could stop wasting money on illegal immigrants, Get a grip of our public finances, stop the obsence waste by all govt depts.............

  • @soxnation1000
    @soxnation1000 11 місяців тому +65

    It's so interesting how polite, gentlemanly and intellectual the British military leaders and soldiers are. If you didn't know they were battle hardened warriors, you'd almost think they were professors in college! I think it's a testament to the professionalism of the British military. No "talking tough" or bombast--they just do their job and let their actions speak.

    • @anthonyeaton5153
      @anthonyeaton5153 10 місяців тому +1

      Very well said. That quote should headlines in every newspaper in Australia.👍✌️

    • @gregoryswidnicki7581
      @gregoryswidnicki7581 10 місяців тому

      That's a great comment, my thoughts exactly.

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому +5

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad, On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @tango6nf477
      @tango6nf477 9 місяців тому +6

      @@1988MaxVivas I do see your point Max but I would say that when Argentina hands back territory taken from Paraguay in the 1864-70 conflict it might strengthen their case. They wont of course because too much time has passed and the land taken is now 100% Argentina, just as the Falklands are 100% British.

    • @TheMerquis
      @TheMerquis 8 місяців тому +6

      @@tango6nf477 add the fact that 99.80% of the population of the Falklands doesn't want to be Argentinian (they voted - 1,513 to 3)

  • @ncatfishepu
    @ncatfishepu 11 місяців тому +31

    As a Chinese international students who currently live in UK, I was curious about every history I could acknowledge, including this one. I think UK did proof that the RN was still hard to be defeated.

    • @Foxtrottangoabc
      @Foxtrottangoabc 11 місяців тому +2

      Yes back then in 1982 the uk defence spending was around 5% gdp . From memory we had about 50 frigates in service, today about 15 frigate destroyers if we are lucky . At the time the UK armed forces was probably the best in the world for its size . Army navy airforce all highly trained and since ww2 the uk had seen action every year somewhere around the world in some size , so uk still had decent modern training of modern warfare

    • @oscarbosio9881
      @oscarbosio9881 11 місяців тому

      Logico, en esa guerra contaron con la importante ayuda de EEUU, la OTAN y la de un Dictador vecino de Argentina, muy cobarde que hizo que la guerra la hagan otros por el.

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому +2

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @yaqui4994
      @yaqui4994 9 місяців тому +3

      1806: First British invasion of Buenos Aires
      Criolla Victory !!!
      1807: Second British invasion of Buenos Aires
      Criolla Victory !!!
      1845 - 1850: War of Parana
      Criolla Victory !!!
      ........
      ....
      ................

    • @Valencetheshireman927
      @Valencetheshireman927 3 місяці тому +2

      @@1988MaxVivasBe gone bot!

  • @TomFynn
    @TomFynn 11 місяців тому +96

    After the surrender, Admiral Woodward was offered a meeting with General Menedez. He refused on the grounds that he felt that he would probably be unable to act fully within the bounds of the Geneva Convention. He was absolutely livid at Menedez for causing all that death and destruction.

    • @jacksimpson-rogers1069
      @jacksimpson-rogers1069 11 місяців тому +9

      Trifling keyboard error, I am sure you meant "absolutely livid".

    • @TomFynn
      @TomFynn 11 місяців тому +9

      @@jacksimpson-rogers1069 Well spotted. Edited.

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @yaqui4994
      @yaqui4994 9 місяців тому +1

      1806: First British invasion of Buenos Aires
      Criolla Victory !!!
      1807: Second British invasion of Buenos Aires
      Criolla Victory !!!
      1845 - 1850: War of Parana
      Criolla Victory !!!
      ........
      ....
      ................

    • @TomFynn
      @TomFynn 9 місяців тому +3

      @@yaqui4994 180ß6/07 were Spain v England what with all that Napoleonic trouble.
      1845 was England/France v Some Guy Who Wanted to be The One that Called Which Provinces Could Do Business with Europe. Argentina did not exist then.

  • @StephenLuke
    @StephenLuke 3 місяці тому +15

    RIP
    To the 255 British servicemen, 649 Argentine servicemen, and three Falkand Islanders who were killed in the Falklands War

  • @Marcus-p5i5s
    @Marcus-p5i5s 6 місяців тому +24

    There's no dispute. The islands have been under European control since LONG before the State of Argentina even existed AND no people from the America's ever inhabited the islands. They were first colonized by Europeans.

    • @LonzieSeal-lc4wm
      @LonzieSeal-lc4wm 3 місяці тому +4

      Speak louder for people in the back, WE SHALL NEVER SURRENDER 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

  • @ukmediawarrior
    @ukmediawarrior 11 місяців тому +33

    No one had seen trench foot since the first world war she says? Obviously not an expert in WW2 then as it was also a big problem there. One prime example is the defence of Bastogne during the Battle of the Bulge where the American 101st suffered terribly in the frozen conditions with little to no cold weather gear.

    • @qasimmir7117
      @qasimmir7117 11 місяців тому +1

      Yeah Major Dick Winters trying to have a shave in the freezing cold.

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @adamazzalino5247
      @adamazzalino5247 4 місяці тому +2

      I, too, saw a mini-series one time

    • @KevenHutchinson-gt1nn
      @KevenHutchinson-gt1nn 4 місяці тому

      @@ukmediawarrior I still would

  • @sonar357
    @sonar357 10 місяців тому +81

    There was a group of US Marines who were part of a "transfer program" serving aboard one of the UK carriers (Invincible, I believe). Though temporarily under the "command" of the British, they were ordered to depart the ship prior to the task force's departure. Naturally, (being Marines) they were unenthusiastic about it because, according to the British, they felt it was "improper to have a war without inviting the US Marines".

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому +3

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @TomFynn
      @TomFynn 9 місяців тому +1

      @@1988MaxVivasSpain established bugger all.

    • @RockyBobbieBuster
      @RockyBobbieBuster 5 місяців тому +8

      @@sonar357 oh my god, it's a British scuffle and the yanks STILL believe this country can't cope without them, what a load of pony

    • @rich667
      @rich667 5 місяців тому +2

      @@1988MaxVivas So Spain took possession of that area of South America from another civilization? and some of those Spanish settlers claimed Independence and renamed the area Argentina? The British then took some Islands now known as Falklands/ Malvinas from those settler, and settled and now the new Settlers known a Falklanders/Malvinas want their independence? Hmmmmm its almost as if history is very long and complicated...

    • @SuperOwls1867
      @SuperOwls1867 5 місяців тому +2

      Bollox

  • @ultrajd
    @ultrajd 11 місяців тому +20

    One thing that’s interesting is if you actually look at some history, you find out that the British government at the time we’re actually considering removing the Falkland Islands from their control. However, I don’t know if it was a vote or a pole. The Islanders all basically claimed they wanted to stay a British territory. And if I recall, all of this was done just months before the conflict started.
    I’ve also read that a number of the Argentinian soldiers, many of which were conscripts didn’t even really understand why they were even there.
    Many of them, apparently even claimed that they saw no real reason for these islands to be taken by Argentina, because they offered nothing in terms of mineral wealth or anything like that.

    • @Damo3445
      @Damo3445 11 місяців тому

      I read that some thought it was just another training exercise around the coast of Argentina, not sure how much of that is true but I can imagine their amazement when it got a little bit spicey!

    • @ultrajd
      @ultrajd 11 місяців тому

      @@Damo3445 do my knowledge. This was also one of the only conflicts, where, at least in terms of NATO type weapons. We’re both sides had basically the exact same weapon with only minor differences. Specifically, considering the fact that the British soldiers had the semi automatic FAL while the Argentinians had the one with full automatic.and there are stories of British soldiers picking up the fully automatic versions. Because they thought it was a lot better. Unfortunately, just like the M4, a fully automatic version of the FAL is not uncontrollable.

    • @oscarbosio9881
      @oscarbosio9881 11 місяців тому +1

      Te explico ya que comentas desde la orbita británica y está bien, pero hay que oir la otra campana. Yo ese año era soldado en Argentina ( Comando de Artillería 121) y si bien no fui a Malvinas si lo hicieron muchos compañeros, amigos y familiares. En primer lugar no eran reclutas, eran soldados que estaban haciendo el servicio militar obligatorio como en muchas partes del mundo, soldados con instrucción militar y sabian perfectamente a donde iban y porque lucharían, en todo caso los que no sabian porque luchaban en ese lugar eran los británicos ya que a ellos se les pagaba para combatir en determinados lugares y ni en la propia Gran Bretaña sabían donde estaban las Malvinas.. Por eso lo cruentos de los combates, esto dicho por los mismos ex combatientes británicos. Un ejercito de reclutas que no saben porque pelean no le ocasionan tanto daño a una potencia militar como Gran Bretaña y sus aliados, EEUU, la OTAN y un Dictador vecino a Argentina, muy cobarde que hizo que la guerra la hagan otros por el. Los soldados no luchaban por las riquezas de esas islas, si por su Soberanía, las mismas fueron usurpadas a Argentina en 1833, por la fuerza, expulsando a toda la población civil, guarnición militar y Gobernador Argentino de Puerto Soledad. Saludos.

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @yaqui4994
      @yaqui4994 9 місяців тому +1

      1806: First British invasion of Buenos Aires
      Criolla Victory !!!
      1807: Second British invasion of Buenos Aires
      Criolla Victory !!!
      1845 - 1850: War of Parana
      Criolla Victory !!!
      ........
      ....
      ................

  • @afrocentricalbion
    @afrocentricalbion 11 місяців тому +19

    The sinking of HMS Sheffield seems very sanitised in this account. The ship was lost as result of negligence/ineptitude, according to most accounts. A ministry of defence inquiry was less than complementary. The Argentine attack was spotted by another ship, and HMS Sheffield notified. The Sheffield failed to respond accordingly.

    • @sichere
      @sichere 11 місяців тому

      Not true - HMS Sheffield was on active Submarine searching. The missile was spotted but at that point the Radars would only identify it as friendly due to the Exocet also being part of the RN inventory.

    • @wor53lg50
      @wor53lg50 11 місяців тому +1

      The shiny shef was on picket duty, her radar was set high, whilst another vessels was set low when the sweep over lapped is where the fault lay as it still was figuring out the calibration, its by sheer coincidence that the jets came in very low, in fact lower than normal doctrine, and the Sheffield being the target is how she got hit...

    • @afrocentricalbion
      @afrocentricalbion 10 місяців тому

      ​@@sichereThe inquiry's findings are available online. See for yourself.

    • @sichere
      @sichere 10 місяців тому

      @@afrocentricalbion It's easy to criticize after the event but HMS Sheffield was concentrating and reacting to the very real and important submarine threat at the time and was commanded by an ex Submariner Captain Salt who went on to become a Rear Admiral.
      Salt volunteered for the sub-surface duty in which his father had lost his life. He commanded the submarine HMS Finwhale (1969-1971), was executive officer of HMS Resolution (1973-1974), and commanded HMS Dreadnought (1978-1979)
      HMS Sheffield had good air defense capabilities but due to the Exocets being identified as friendly there was no way of engaging them and if HMS Sheffield had evaded the missile by using chaff then it would have gone on to seek out the next large target, which by all accounts would have probably been Invincible.
      You don't get to become a Rear Admiral after losing your ship for nothing !

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

  • @mrt4937
    @mrt4937 7 днів тому +1

    Growing up I never really knew just how big this battle was. I've learned so much from this documentary. Thank you

  • @johnr7279
    @johnr7279 11 місяців тому +11

    One of the better documentaries I've ever seen on this very interesting and surprising--at that time--conflict.

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

  • @StevenKeery
    @StevenKeery 11 місяців тому +49

    Condolences to the families of troops who lost their lives or to those who were maimed or injured.
    It was an immense achievement on the part of British forces and testament to their courage and professionalism.
    Others around the World should be left in no doubt, that Britain will defend British people and British interests, no matter the foe, no matter the odds.
    God bless all those who served.
    God bless the Falkland Islanders, each and everyone.
    May you remain British forever. A salutary warning that aggressor nations can never be appeased.

    • @arostwocents
      @arostwocents 11 місяців тому +2

      Shame we confuse British interests for the interests of international finance in the modern day

    • @bagoistvan3182
      @bagoistvan3182 11 місяців тому

      🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

    • @SM-zm5xt
      @SM-zm5xt 9 місяців тому

      Britain left the islands in 1774, never protesting or challenging the 32 Spanish and 5 Argentine governors, any claim prescribed by acquiescence after 55 years of complete silence. They had absolutely no right to take them from Argentina that was already settled in 1833

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @SerpentineSeiđr
      @SerpentineSeiđr 9 місяців тому +7

      @@1988MaxVivas The people living on the islands identify as British, are of British descent, and speak English. Allowing Argentina to claim the islands overrules the people's desire for self determination, Argentina tried to take them by force at the start of the war.
      Declaring the islands as Argentine land now wouldn't be too dissimilar to when a part of Palestine was declared as Israel in 1948. Do you think that Argentina would respect the rights of the predominantly British-descent islanders, given the hostility that survives to this day? Because I think that would be incredibly naive.

  • @lashachakhunashvili1399
    @lashachakhunashvili1399 11 місяців тому +37

    Fun fact: the Spanish name for the islands (Islas Malvinas) originates from a French city of Saint-Malo which itself is named after a British monk. 🇬🇧

    • @wor53lg50
      @wor53lg50 11 місяців тому +1

      Type that name into Google at see what name it spits back out??, Enuff said...

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому +2

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @richgilmour5924
      @richgilmour5924 5 місяців тому +2

      ​@@1988MaxVivasand the fact that 99.9% of the islands population want to remain British 😂😂

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 4 місяці тому +1

      @@richgilmour5924 the population is british. That doesn't change the fact they were taking from Argentina by force.

    • @dorakizz5650
      @dorakizz5650 4 місяці тому

      @@richgilmour5924 They will beg to change that once they realize they can end up like Southport lmao

  • @stuckp1stuckp122
    @stuckp1stuckp122 11 місяців тому +7

    It was very interesting to hear about the aftermath, a part of history rarely talked about.

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

  • @alsaunders3937
    @alsaunders3937 8 місяців тому +3

    The BEST DOC. I have ever seen. Well documented, informative, and exciting! From SC in the USA 67yo male BA;MS;PhD

  • @tommaxson9798
    @tommaxson9798 9 місяців тому +10

    The Brits still make the finest documentaries.

  • @54mgtf22
    @54mgtf22 11 місяців тому +4

    Hi IWM. Love your work 👍

  • @alphonso391
    @alphonso391 11 місяців тому +49

    Let’s not forget that the Argentine dictator also wanted Chile on the same basis.

    • @cristianmolina8148
      @cristianmolina8148 11 місяців тому +7

      Yes, but in Chile we had generals who protected the country in those days, so it wouldn't be easy to Argentina..maybe even would lost against us...anyways, in these days, with the people we have in power now, would be a different story..

    • @estebanguajardo5809
      @estebanguajardo5809 11 місяців тому

      ​@@cristianmolina8148los generales de ese entonces eran austeros de acuerdo a un ejército que se decía prusiano, ahora hay corrupción en los generales y eso puede comprometer la seguridad de la nación.

    • @cristianmolina8148
      @cristianmolina8148 11 місяців тому

      Los generales de antes eran patriotas y profesionales..Argentina no la habría sacado fácil y capaz hasta se habría dado vuelta la cosa...Hoy día, con generales felices que no están en guerra con nadie, director de carabineros zurdo y vendidos y un pseudo- gobierno inepto, ultra zurdo y corrupto..mejor ni pensar qué pasaría@@estebanguajardo5809

    • @oscarbosio9881
      @oscarbosio9881 11 місяців тому +2

      Tampoco olviden que la ex Primera Ministra en su discurso ante las Cámaras dijo que jamas dialogaría con un Dictador, solo con Gobiernos Democráticos y tuvo de aliado en Malvinas a uno de los mas sangrientos Dictadores de Sudamérica, el Gral Pinochet, a quien no dudó de ayudarlo cuando fue detenido en Londres por crimenes de lesa humanidad, invocando su valiosa ayida en Malvinas. Una hipocresía total.

    • @Anglo_Saxon1
      @Anglo_Saxon1 10 місяців тому +8

      ​​​@@oscarbosio9881What about the 30,000 innocent Argentines who were "disappeared" by their own government?And you speak of hypocrisy.

  • @wmvdw1978
    @wmvdw1978 11 місяців тому +20

    Thank you! For some reason I'm fascinated by this conflict, even though I'm not British or Argentinian. Maybe it has to do with the competence displayed by both the British soldiers and the Argentinian pilots. It seems to have gone downhill from there.

    • @Poliss95
      @Poliss95 11 місяців тому +9

      The Argentine pilots weren't very competent at all. They were dropping their bombs to close to the RN ships meaning the fuses weren't activated. It was only after some plonker on British TV explained this that they altered their bombing technique.

    • @soxnation1000
      @soxnation1000 11 місяців тому +5

      Same here...I'm from neither country. For me, it's very interesting because of the logistics involved for the UK to fight a war 8000 miles away, and also because both sides had modern military equipment, so it's an example of modern warfare at sea, on land and in the air.

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @GregorTownsend-y8n
      @GregorTownsend-y8n 9 місяців тому +1

      What about the British FAA pilots that shot down all those Argentine jets for no loss?

  • @derrywalker7835
    @derrywalker7835 7 місяців тому +2

    Absolutely fantastic and concise documentary, so many facts I never knew. Thank you

  • @MoosePissUK
    @MoosePissUK 11 місяців тому +7

    Argentina such a friendly place and people 4 minutes into the video. It does boggle the mind when NAZI war criminals are given asylum, The Argentine goverment with authoritarion violations to their own citizens rights are suddenly forgotten when they invade the Falklands.

  • @kektuss
    @kektuss 11 місяців тому +16

    It’s strange seeing photos of British troops fighting around ‘British style’ homes.

    • @sichere
      @sichere 11 місяців тому +4

      They did it for years in Northern Island

    • @TomFynn
      @TomFynn 11 місяців тому +1

      That is what killed a lot of morale for the Argentine troops, since they suddenly found out that they had been lied to.

    • @harrymail7
      @harrymail7 3 місяці тому +3

      @kektuss Ever heard of the troubles in Northern Ireland? Plenty of that

    • @AlejandroLopez-ru4iv
      @AlejandroLopez-ru4iv Місяць тому

      Piratas

  • @alanmoore2197
    @alanmoore2197 3 місяці тому +5

    Good Documentary - but note - Ascension Island is a British Territory with an RAF & hosted USAF base - there was really no need for US permissions to use it - just notification of expected very elevated operations and of extra fuel requirements. We lived near RAF Lyneham airfield in the UK and went 10 pin bowling there once a week. During the Falklands war Lyneham was very very busy - accessing the base required lots of extra personnel & vehicle checks and the base was very active with C130 Hercules coming & going day and night for the supply airbridge via RAF Ascension Island.

  • @ianbell5611
    @ianbell5611 11 місяців тому +24

    I was serving in the Australian navy on a type 14 frigate or as the RAN called them Destroyer escort.
    We were heading East across the Pacific to Hawwaii to conduct RIMPAC exercises with the yanks.
    Word of the Falklands conflict spread round the ship with a strong rumor that we were going to be re-deployed to assist the Royal navy then the rumor changed and that we were to head to the Persian gulf to relive a Royal navy frigate so it could sail South to the Falklands.
    Obviously neither of these scenarios came true, but as a young nineteen year old whose father and uncle saw service in the RN during WW2 I was keen to get amongst it, Silly boy I was.
    Interesting to hear Israel assisted Argentina in the fight against Britain, when my understanding is Britain through Lord Balfour played a crucial part in the creation of Israel.🤔

    • @jacksimpson-rogers1069
      @jacksimpson-rogers1069 11 місяців тому

      I do not like theocracies. The Orange Order of Northern Ireland, where I lived for 14 years, held that "home rule is Rome rule", and in the time of Garret Fitzgerald, Pope Paul VI personally met with FitzGerald to tell him that "Ireland was a Catholic country", which confirms the reason for the Border when the southern counties gained their freedom from Britain.

    • @KKTR3
      @KKTR3 2 місяці тому

      @@ianbell5611 so somewhere it says that Israel helped Argentinian if that’s correct and my whole attitude to Israel is now changing completely completely come on Palestinians

  • @jeffshootsstuff
    @jeffshootsstuff 11 місяців тому +12

    Thanks for this. I lived through it but I was too young to understand what was going on.

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

  • @michaelhowell2326
    @michaelhowell2326 11 місяців тому +196

    Falklands then. Falklands now. Falklands forever.

    • @martinbrode7131
      @martinbrode7131 11 місяців тому

      And stupid comments forever. 😂

    • @tram7649
      @tram7649 11 місяців тому +3

      Wwe 🤣🤣🤣

    • @gaHuJIa_Macmep
      @gaHuJIa_Macmep 11 місяців тому +3

      Делай с нами. Делай как мы. Делай лучше нас.

    • @patrickedmunds2835
      @patrickedmunds2835 10 місяців тому +4

      Though I'm an American, even i agree.

    • @Georgianson
      @Georgianson 10 місяців тому +2

      Hm... I did not know the UK islands are that long- all the way from Scotland up to Argentina...)

  • @H-Zazoo
    @H-Zazoo 10 місяців тому +27

    The Falkland Islands does not have two names. Unless you count 1. Falkland 2. Islands. I suppose then it does.

    • @yaqui4994
      @yaqui4994 9 місяців тому +3

      1806: First British invasion of Buenos Aires
      Criolla Victory !!!
      1807: Second British invasion of Buenos Aires
      Criolla Victory !!!
      1845 - 1850: War of Parana
      Criolla Victory !!!
      ........
      ....
      ................

  • @YdobonLlata
    @YdobonLlata 9 місяців тому +21

    I didn't spend weeks from goose green to Stanley cold and getting shot for nothing.
    Yep Falkand then , now , and always. Still looks like we left it 42 yrs ago.

    • @MrBolshevik17
      @MrBolshevik17 5 місяців тому

      @@YdobonLlata thank you for your service!

  • @TheDutie
    @TheDutie 5 місяців тому +4

    It's incredible how humanity is at war with each other since the first tribes were formed, but we just recently learned about ptsd

  • @bravo2zero796
    @bravo2zero796 11 місяців тому +6

    Brilliant brilliant documentary 👏

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @bravo2zero796
      @bravo2zero796 9 місяців тому +2

      @Max1988_ Don't cry about it. The population of the falklands wants to be British.

  • @anthonyeaton5153
    @anthonyeaton5153 11 місяців тому +51

    Argentina fought for the Islands, Britain fought for the Islanders. Kudos.

    • @TomFynn
      @TomFynn 11 місяців тому +3

      I am going to steal that line.

    • @anthonyeaton5153
      @anthonyeaton5153 11 місяців тому +2

      @@TomFynn Be my guest Tom.

  • @Anglo_Saxon1
    @Anglo_Saxon1 10 місяців тому +32

    "Argentina believed that Britain wouldn't respond"
    I'd be truly interested to find out if there has been any point in British history where a foreign nation has been allowed to simply invade a UK territory and keep it while the uk government sits idle.

    • @griftinggamer
      @griftinggamer 10 місяців тому +4

      Yes, that point in British history is today, the past couple decades, and the foreseeable future.

    • @Anglo_Saxon1
      @Anglo_Saxon1 10 місяців тому

      @griftinggamer There's always a bloody clever clogs 😉

    • @wc8246
      @wc8246 10 місяців тому +4

      The Southern Thule occupation probably gave them that impression

    • @Anglo_Saxon1
      @Anglo_Saxon1 10 місяців тому +1

      @wc8246 You might be right there actually 👍

    • @lautaropinero7043
      @lautaropinero7043 6 місяців тому +2

      El gobierno argentino también creyó que USA no apoyaría a UK, otro gravísimo error

  • @michaelhowell2326
    @michaelhowell2326 11 місяців тому +18

    Let's just hope this was the last time Britain tried the appeasement route. In doesn't ever seem to work out.

    • @deadmemesrus1119
      @deadmemesrus1119 10 місяців тому +2

      It’s failed so many times now.
      Germany, Argentina, Russia. The alternative is a shame though.

    • @SM-zm5xt
      @SM-zm5xt 9 місяців тому

      ​@@deadmemesrus1119It's funny considering that, in this case, UK is like Germany/Russia in South America. You are the invaders

  • @FuriousFire898
    @FuriousFire898 11 місяців тому +14

    Second Falklands documentary I’ve watched this week LETS GO ❤

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому +2

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

  • @ramirogarcia1967
    @ramirogarcia1967 Місяць тому +3

    I never understood why the sinking of the Belgrano is or was controversial, its war, you find the enemy and you ensure its no longer a threat. It was the obvious thing to do.

  • @unbreakable7633
    @unbreakable7633 4 місяці тому +5

    Alexander Haig was right when he told the Argentines: "You're going to get the hell kicked out of you." A modern professional military against a bunch of rank amateurs.

  • @RTmadnesstoo
    @RTmadnesstoo 11 місяців тому +3

    That Rose is very impressive in construction, in meaning and as a symbol. It seems a shame to hide it in a box.

  • @martinerdozain1623
    @martinerdozain1623 3 дні тому

    For the rest of it, great documentary !!!

  • @juanbautistaissel7655
    @juanbautistaissel7655 2 місяці тому +4

    I am from Argentina and I sincerely apologize to the British. 😞

  • @Brian-----
    @Brian----- 11 місяців тому +1

    Awesome video! I wish to indicate (re: start of video) that the islands are named, in Spanish and French simply as languages and not so as to further a dispute, las Islas Malvinas / les Îles Malouines because of the French port of St. Malo whence came 18th century French fishermen fishing around the islands. The Spanish name actually comes from French.

  • @pyeitme508
    @pyeitme508 11 місяців тому +15

    Oversimplified be like: "There's a tax for that.".😂

    • @wweminehead
      @wweminehead 11 місяців тому

      There's a tax 4 that. I can't believe it's taken him over a year to upload but it's nice to see him back

    • @peterkilbridge6523
      @peterkilbridge6523 11 місяців тому +5

      Did you take your medications this morning, Sir?

  • @TheTimGowen
    @TheTimGowen 11 місяців тому +2

    This was really terrific!

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @louisbeerreviews8964
      @louisbeerreviews8964 23 дні тому

      @@1988MaxVivasbollox

  • @GH-oi2jf
    @GH-oi2jf 11 місяців тому +28

    Argentina's claim is without merit. Evidence of the insincerity of their claim is that they invaded not only the Falklands/Malvinas, but also South Georgia. South Georgia is much farther from Argentina, and it has no Spanish or Argentine history at all. It has always been British entirely.

    • @oscarbosio9881
      @oscarbosio9881 11 місяців тому

      No es así. Nadie invade algo que le pertenece, en todo caso intentó recuperar un territorio que le fue arrebatado por la fuerza en 1833, expulsando a toda la población civil, guarnición militar y Gobernador Argentino de Malvinas, por algo recurrieron a la fuerza para hacerlo. Gran Bretaña reconoció la Independencia de Argentina en 1825 y no hizo ningún reclamo sobre su integridad territorial que ya contaba con Malvinas heredada por el principio de uti possidets de la Corona Españoal.. Simplemente se remitió a invadir parte de un pais Soberano que había reconocido como tal- Argentina tiene demasiados fundamentos históricos, geográficos y juridicos que avalan su posición, los cuales nunca han podido ser derrumbados por GB, y hoy para Naciones Unidas Malvinas sigue siendo una colonia, un territorio en disputa sujeto a la descolonización. Es verdad las Islas Georgias están un poco mas lejos que Malvinas de Argentina, pero muchisimo mas lejos, en la otra parte del mundo, de Gran Bretaña a mas de 12.000 km y fueron descubiertas por españoles, algo que el mismo Cook reconoció. El primer asentamiento humano en ellas fue en 1904 por una compañia de pesca Argentina al amparo de leyes argentinas y su bandera, en 1905 Argentina instaló una oficina meteorológica, que funcionó hasta 1950 cuando los británicos se apoderaron de ella. Nunca fue enteramente británica.

    • @SM-zm5xt
      @SM-zm5xt 9 місяців тому +3

      Britain left the islands in 1774, never protesting or challenging the 32 Spanish and 5 Argentine governors, any claim prescribed by acquiescence after 55 years of complete silence. They had absolutely no right to take them from Argentina that was already settled in 1833

    • @likeitout
      @likeitout 8 місяців тому

      ⁠​⁠@@SM-zm5xt. That’s not true. Britain left behind a plaque and flag reiterating her claim. That was not acquiescing to Spanish sovereignty claims. The Nootka treaty hadn’t been rescinded and it insured both nations agreed to leave aside contesting each others claim and British sealers and whalers, still continued to use the islands. Spain too, abandoned the islands in 1811, also leaving behind a plaque claiming continual sovereignty.
      There are only five recognised methods of obtaining sovereignty in international law.
      Conquest,
      Cession,
      Prescription,
      Effective Occupation and Accretion.
      Argentina cannot lay claim to any of the above. There is no law of inheritance and effective occupation wrests with Spain alone. If the centre of colonial administration was a factor in sovereignty claims then Equatorial Guinea was ruled from the viceroyalty of the Rio de la Plata. Good luck claiming sovereignty over that place.
      Spain only recognised the new state of Argentina in 1863 but without the inclusion of the Falklands within its borders. In that same year, Spain also recognised British sovereignty of the islands.
      The United Kingdom had invited Argentina as the plaintiff, to present a case before the UNICJ. On numerous occasions. Argentina refused which is proof of any was needed, that her legal and historic argument is false.

    • @Sparkypark
      @Sparkypark 5 місяців тому +2

      @@SM-zm5xtbollocks mate.

    • @SM-zm5xt
      @SM-zm5xt 5 місяців тому

      @@Sparkypark 😴👍🏼

  • @tonywoodham3760
    @tonywoodham3760 4 місяці тому

    Thank You, very interesting, informative.

  • @X737_
    @X737_ 8 місяців тому +7

    They thought Britain wouldn’t respond 😂 they don’t know Britain then

  • @usertakenagain
    @usertakenagain Місяць тому +1

    Does this documentary go back and forth or am I loosing my mind?

  • @andrewwmacfadyen6958
    @andrewwmacfadyen6958 11 місяців тому +5

    The BBC particularly the lunchtime programme. Pebble Mill at One had been warning about the impending invasion for weeks before it happend

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

  • @DocEmCee
    @DocEmCee 2 місяці тому +5

    The issue was settled in 1982; when we expelled the Argentine forces, that was the end of the matter.

  • @alexanderjacobsen7382
    @alexanderjacobsen7382 11 місяців тому +39

    They do have two names, I agree. West Falkland and East Falkland.

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому +3

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @alexanderjacobsen7382
      @alexanderjacobsen7382 9 місяців тому +7

      @@1988MaxVivas cry harder

    • @marcj3682
      @marcj3682 9 місяців тому

      Oh dear

    • @RaquelÁlvarez-z2i
      @RaquelÁlvarez-z2i 8 місяців тому

      ​@@1988MaxVivasXV. Arg. Nooooooooooo. Era. Pais. Era. Virreinato de. España

    • @sonnygamx9006
      @sonnygamx9006 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@@1988MaxVivas Dont waste your time arguing with this brishit. They dont even read the facts.

  • @timgosling6189
    @timgosling6189 11 місяців тому +5

    Good summary.
    FYI, 'Thule' as in Southern Thule is a Norse name and pronounced 'Too-lee', not 'Th-ewe-l'.
    I was with a Harrier detachment at Belize at the beginning of Apr 82. When we heard no one had any idea where the Falklands were, although I'd read of the place as a punishment posting in 'Brave New World'.
    The RoE for the Task Force weren't changed on 1 May 'to include warships'; I think you must have just mis-spoke. Clearly it was set up primarily to include warships. The change was to authorise Conqueror to attack enemy warships outside the Exclusion Zone.
    The attack on the Belgrano is also rather misrepresented. Yes, 20m of deck was ruptured but that would not have been fatal. Rather, is was the enormous hole ripped in the side of the ship that dealt the key blow, although the loss of the entire bow a few seconds early would not have helped the ship's navigability!
    The first description of the non-detonation of Argentine bombs is slightly off. The bombs are fused by a wee propellor on the nose that has to spin a certain number of times and screw in a contact before the fuse is made live. With the A-4s forced into ultra low-level release these props didn't have time before they hit to spin up and arm the bombs. So it wasn't the skill of the pilots that was the problem but over-conservativism by the armourers. Once of course as I understand it [a UK Red-Top Newspaper] had made the issue public they were able to rectify this.
    You repeatedly talk about there being just 20 SHAR, but this was the number embarked in UK on the 2 carriers. Another 8 came down on Atlantic Conveyor and transferred to the carriers before she was lost.
    I did wonder when we were going to get round to 1 Sqn and the GR3 Harriers, and it's a little odd to be talking about countering the Argie air threat while standing in front of a GR3, all of whose sorties were of course air-to-mud. So yes there were another 4 RAF Harriers on Hermes from the start and a further 6 arrived on the RFA. So the actual total Harrier force numbered 32, although 4 GRs were lost to ground fire and 6 SHAR to SAM, AAA and accident.
    In re Black Buck, the physical impact was the tactical impact. The word you need in 'strategic'. And before the debate starts, no, 1000lb bombs delivered at low-level are pretty useless against runways, retard tails or not, and the Harriers had no high-level bombing capability.
    The GR3s were never, at any stage fitted with radar!
    The main problem I have with this though is that is clearly stitched together from previous material so the timeline is frequently broken and there is lots of repetition, some issues being covered three times! Better editing would both shorten and improve!

  • @MASTERATCOD4
    @MASTERATCOD4 11 місяців тому +3

    Seen this a few times before probably watch it again sometime 👍

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @philzz2000
      @philzz2000 2 місяці тому

      @@1988MaxVivasno one cares

  • @martm216
    @martm216 9 місяців тому +4

    Could we say that the Harrier was the Spitfire of its day?

  • @Spook277
    @Spook277 3 місяці тому

    Excellent documentary!

  • @Dadopŕsoblueboots
    @Dadopŕsoblueboots 11 місяців тому +4

    As a young army recruit . We were on standby to go.

    • @wor53lg50
      @wor53lg50 11 місяців тому +2

      More Brits would probably be more willing to fight for the falklands to stay British to keep heritage and culture alive for the future than there own nation, thats seems to becoming a loosing battle of staying With British values every day....

  • @Felipe-rw3vw
    @Felipe-rw3vw 11 місяців тому +2

    great documentary, thanks!

    • @mariocisneros911
      @mariocisneros911 11 місяців тому

      I find it ridiculous that nations thousands of miles away continue claiming land that is really belongs to the nearest inhabitants. I could list 5 but there are probably many more who commit this imperialistic aggression

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @louisbeerreviews8964
      @louisbeerreviews8964 23 дні тому

      @@1988MaxVivasbollox

  • @alaintremaine3302
    @alaintremaine3302 11 місяців тому +6

    Many thanks to the IWM for this in-depth look at the Falkland/Malvinas. You helped explain the political situation, whereas neither the U.S. nor Argentina ever did or would have.

    • @qasimmir7117
      @qasimmir7117 11 місяців тому +2

      Falkland Islands, never ‘Malvinas.’

    • @nestorsalto4778
      @nestorsalto4778 10 місяців тому

      @@qasimmir7117 Son islas que ocupan el espacio marítimo argentino, pertenencian a España en 1800. Cuando Argentina consigue su independencia también se queda con las Malvinas en 1816. Pero al no estar bien defendidas fueron usurpadas por la flota británica en 1833 desalojando a los argentinos que vivían ahí y a sus autoridades, en 1833 Argentina tenia muchos problemas internos, una guerra llamada "Unitarios VS Federales" por lo que no hubo una guerra contra Gran Bretaña. Pero no deja de ser una toma ilegal, esto se puede deducir por sentido común, el territorio continental británico queda a 12.800 kilómetros del territorio de las islas, mientras que el territorio continental argentino está a 340 kilómetros de éstas. Pero creo que no interesa a ningún país las islas en sí, sino el reclamo del territorio de la Antártida por proximidad. Seguramente se sucederán otras guerras en un futuro. Pero las Malvinas siempre van a ser territorio Argentino, por sentido común.

    • @nzgunnie
      @nzgunnie 10 місяців тому +1

      @@nestorsalto4778 Falklands have been British since before Argentina existed. That you tried to illegally occupy them in the 1800s as well, before being sent home the first time gives no more legitimacy to your claim.

    • @alessandrobanovich6847
      @alessandrobanovich6847 8 місяців тому

      ​@@nestorsalto4778 a nos otros no importa nada de eso. Ahora mismo, las islas son britanicas, especialmente porquè los abitantes quieren ser asì.

  • @Jakob_DK
    @Jakob_DK 11 місяців тому +2

    Is this changed? Or just a reupload?

    • @littleshep5502
      @littleshep5502 11 місяців тому +7

      They condensed all their episodes into one and uploaded them all together

    • @Jakob_DK
      @Jakob_DK 11 місяців тому

      @@littleshep5502
      Thanks.

  • @MC-nb6jx
    @MC-nb6jx 11 місяців тому +9

    The Argentinians heard the Gurkha’s were on the way and they knew it was simply a matter of time until they lost..
    So they got out of there before they arrived🤔

    • @DarrenMarsh-kx8hd
      @DarrenMarsh-kx8hd 11 місяців тому

      Got out of where?

    • @MC-nb6jx
      @MC-nb6jx 11 місяців тому +3

      @@DarrenMarsh-kx8hd … So you’ve never heard about the Gurkha's reputation as fierce soldiers??
      You’d definitely want them on your side and not have to face them..

    • @DarrenMarsh-kx8hd
      @DarrenMarsh-kx8hd 11 місяців тому

      @MC-nb6jx the question I asked, is "where did the Argentines 'get out of'?"

    • @MC-nb6jx
      @MC-nb6jx 11 місяців тому +2

      @@DarrenMarsh-kx8hd … Well if you watch the video they tell you!!🙄
      1:12:54 Mount William when the Gurkha's arrived the Argentines had left..

    • @SuperFunkmachine
      @SuperFunkmachine 11 місяців тому

      They where told by there press that the Gurkha’s where cannibal slave soldiers that had to be chain up outside of battle...
      odd that conscripts didn't fancy fighting them.

  • @MarkVickers-xq9si
    @MarkVickers-xq9si 11 місяців тому +7

    As I understand it (I'm open for correction) , G.B. was already willing to give the Falklands back to Argentina, but was in negotiations to ensure the residents some reasonable Rights . I'm really glad the Brits put them in their place . The Brits really try to be DECENT , but have a Steel backbone when they get Abused . Then ... they get as mean as anyone can . Good for them . And good for Thatcher !

    • @wor53lg50
      @wor53lg50 11 місяців тому

      Yet we constantly get labelled nasty little Brits and constantly bashed over our past and cherry picked over every other single nation, ethnicity, culture, religion thats has done the exact same things, although a lot worse for many of them!!,...

    • @SM-zm5xt
      @SM-zm5xt 9 місяців тому

      Britain left the islands in 1774, never protesting or challenging the 32 Spanish and 5 Argentine governors, any claim prescribed by acquiescence after 55 years of complete silence. They had absolutely no right to take them from Argentina that was already settled in 1833

    • @wor53lg50
      @wor53lg50 9 місяців тому

      @@SM-zm5xt another idiot clueless to facts and history or suffers from cognitive dis-association...

  • @downunderrob
    @downunderrob 11 місяців тому +15

    THE FALKLANDS ARE BRITISH!
    THE FALKLANDS ARE BRITISH!
    THE FALKLANDS ARE BRITISH! 🇫🇰 🇬🇧

    • @wor53lg50
      @wor53lg50 11 місяців тому

      Aye, indeed my cousins, make sure you watch who you let in or how many and what types if you do, or it could end up like london with the foreign mare if another vote comes... You know what i mean?....

    • @1988MaxVivas
      @1988MaxVivas 9 місяців тому +1

      Spain established its sovereignty starting in the 15th century over the Argentine territory and the Malvinas Islands. At the Nootka convention in 1790, England recognized as Spanish territory up to 18,520 kilometers (10 nautical leagues) from the coasts that its colonies occupied, with the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands only a little more than 500 kilometers away.
      In 1816 Argentina achieved its independence by claiming what was previously Spanish territory.
      In 1820 Argentina established its colony in Puerto Soledad and MAINTAINED POSSESSION OF THE ISLANDS FOR 13 YEARS.
      Rejecting illegal US fishing led to the attack by the war corvette Lexington on Puerto Soledad.
      On January 2, 1833, the British war frigate HMS Clio arrived, commanded by Captain John James Onslow, who took possession of the islands from the captain of the schooner Sarandí, José María Pinedo, because he was not in good condition. to resist.
      Let all good English people know that the Malvinas Islands are currently under the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. And the only thing that holds them back is British political and military power.

    • @downunderrob
      @downunderrob 9 місяців тому

      @Max1988_ Underachievers like Argentina sucking up to the UN, just because they failed miserably to get what they wanted by force? Is nothing new.
      But so long as the Citizens of The Falkland Islands practice self-determination and choose to be part of the Commonwealth.
      Then Argentina can choke on its own national bile.
      Seriously for a moment.
      What can they offer anyone except economic chaos, social discrimination and repression.
      🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

    • @TeamPiedru
      @TeamPiedru 9 місяців тому

      No

    • @downunderrob
      @downunderrob 9 місяців тому +1

      @@TeamPiedru Oh si`. Simplemte si. Absolutamente si`. 🇬🇧

  • @akherverullunjuk1954
    @akherverullunjuk1954 4 місяці тому +9

    To me currently, the Falkland islands are the Falkland islands and not "Las Islas Malvinas."

    • @santiagoalfaro7855
      @santiagoalfaro7855 2 місяці тому

      Mirá,para mi al revés,son las islas Malvinas...

    • @jacobandrew2701
      @jacobandrew2701 2 місяці тому

      @@santiagoalfaro7855 obviously not

    • @damiangallo4185
      @damiangallo4185 28 днів тому

      @@santiagoalfaro7855 las malvinas son argentinas, the Falklands are British

  • @ale4176
    @ale4176 8 місяців тому +5

    Excellent documentary, greetings from Chile 🇨🇱

  • @davidturner4610
    @davidturner4610 4 місяці тому +1

    I feel for the losses and casualties on both sides. This war was a micro apocalypse in my opinion. Settling this dispute by peaceful means would have been better and saved lives.

  • @DaveSCameron
    @DaveSCameron 11 місяців тому +3

    8.000 Miles Away - Jegsy Dodd and the Sons of Harry Cross.
    #poetry #OurHistory ☘️ 📚 🌟

  • @FhrithctebjXg
    @FhrithctebjXg 11 місяців тому +2

    Great documentary

  • @TheBerendir
    @TheBerendir 5 місяців тому +3

    A thousand people! Ruzzia is losing that a day in Ukraine. Please don't hate as a Brit with family who fought in the war I'm not downplaying their service and bravery!

  • @GrenvilleP710
    @GrenvilleP710 5 місяців тому +3

    These Islands have one name. Self determination is a UN resolution.

    • @cipriano1066
      @cipriano1066 4 місяці тому

      La isla no tiene población nativa, la gente que vive allí son colonos. No pueden decidir.

    • @nzgunnie
      @nzgunnie 4 місяці тому +1

      @@cipriano1066 all those of European descent in South America are settlers too. They don't get to decide for the Islanders.
      If you accept self determination for the population of the mainland you must accept self determination for the Islanders.

    • @jacobandrew2701
      @jacobandrew2701 2 місяці тому

      You could say the same about Argentina, people didn't always live there either 😂​@@cipriano1066

  • @Radio478
    @Radio478 11 місяців тому +3

    That Vulcan aircraft is still preserved at RAF WADDINGTON Lincolnshire England 🇬🇧

  • @fastdust3410
    @fastdust3410 9 місяців тому

    Great documentary explaining, why things happened

  • @AndrewAHayes
    @AndrewAHayes 9 місяців тому +4

    I loved the lyrics of a Macc lads song " Frey Bentos and cheap red wine, Is all they have in the Argentine, But after a scrap with the English Navy they asked for the recipe for chips and gravy!.
    Hilarious

  • @zorroholla6024
    @zorroholla6024 7 місяців тому

    There is a mistake in the time line. In 1976 asume the junta, but Galtieri assume as president in 1981.

  • @Luceq
    @Luceq 11 місяців тому +4

    Argentinian Gov't unintentionally proped up Tatcher's. That's ironic.

    • @anthonyeaton5153
      @anthonyeaton5153 10 місяців тому

      Yes thank goodness.

    • @likeitout
      @likeitout 8 місяців тому +1

      Argentina gave her the opportunity to show how effective a leader she was and how she, a housewife and daughter of a greengrocer from Grantham, was worth more than Argentina’s top three military men. She certainly had a much higher intellect than them. A scientist and a qualified lawyer, who did her bar exams whilst in a hospital bed having just given birth. Britain gave Argentina the opportunity to show the rest of her Latin neighbours who had always been concerned about her bellicosity, how inept her military was. Thatcher also caused the downfall of the dictatorship that in turn, enabled the return to democracy.

    • @sergioandres7343
      @sergioandres7343 6 місяців тому

      el dictador argentino también estaba pasando tiempos de baja aprobación ciudadana por eso busco invadir falkland y después apunto a mi país chile

    • @juanbautistaissel7655
      @juanbautistaissel7655 2 місяці тому

      At least that dictatorial government that we had was a government that saved us from the communism of the Soviet Union.

  • @brianhodgson9547
    @brianhodgson9547 11 місяців тому +2

    It was another 'Nelson moment' - what other Wars probably didn't even start due to winning the Falklands War

  • @sichere
    @sichere 11 місяців тому +13

    There is only one name for the Falkland Islands

  • @TheColossalShadow
    @TheColossalShadow 2 місяці тому

    Reporting on and publicly releasing sensitive information concerning a surprise attack and then complaining that the government won’t let you report on the war is completely baffling to me. It seems obvious to me that they’re not gonna give you any information after you potentially cost people their lives.

  • @agl1138
    @agl1138 10 місяців тому +3

    Disappointing that there are no real legal arguments presented here. There is really nothing on the legal claims to the territory. And we get the usual load of old rubbish about the Belgrano: declaring an exclusion zone means that all enemy belligerent ships are on notice that they risk attack within the zone. It does not say anything about attacking them outside the zone, which the RN were at liberty to do subject to the Law of Armed Conflict. The Belgrano was a perfectly legitimate target. Why declare an exclusion zone at all if it so limits your freedom of action?

  • @andrewoliver8930
    @andrewoliver8930 27 днів тому +1

    At least the Argentinians got rid of their dodgy leader.

  • @gabrielpacana8596
    @gabrielpacana8596 11 місяців тому +4

    Excellent documentary on the Falklands War. I don't blame the guys who retreated from the Gurkhas. Lol

  • @carlosjose2979
    @carlosjose2979 Місяць тому +2

    I am Peruvian and I say that currently the Malvinas Islands are English. Although Peru has helped Argentina in the war, Argentina currently does not seem very grateful and even seems indifferent towards Peru, and even sold weapons to Ecuador in the face of a conflict between Peru and Ecuador. I have met English people who speak well of my country, Peru. I think we helped the wrong ones.

    • @louisbeerreviews8964
      @louisbeerreviews8964 23 дні тому

      Thank you

    • @BadEnoch-t7z
      @BadEnoch-t7z 23 дні тому

      British not English

    • @carlosjose2979
      @carlosjose2979 22 дні тому

      lol

    • @gabrielpoltronieri3910
      @gabrielpoltronieri3910 7 днів тому

      Error, hermanito peruano. La venta de armas a Ecuador fue realizada por un grupo de políticos corruptos, de manera ilegal y en total desconocimiento del Senado y la población. Creo que obvias el hecho de que volaron media ciudad para encubrir el hecho, y que un ex presidente fue CONDENADO por la Justicia por la causa.

  • @wolfhalupka8992
    @wolfhalupka8992 7 місяців тому +6

    I'm terribly sorry. sure, the Argentinians can call those islands whatever they like, but these are the Falkland Islands, no doubt about it. just ask the people who live there.

    • @gaston2379
      @gaston2379 5 місяців тому

      En 1833 cuando reino unido invade las islas, los habitantes de la misma eran criollos de las provincias unidas del rio de la plata (argentina oero con otro nombre) y ellos no querian ser britqnicos, los echaron de las islas a la fuerza

    • @nzgunnie
      @nzgunnie 4 місяці тому +1

      @@gaston2379 1833 the Islands had already been British for decades, and all Britain did was remove Argentina's illegal occupation. The Falklands were British long before Argentina existed, and remains so today.

    • @gaston2379
      @gaston2379 4 місяці тому

      @@nzgunnielas malvinas fueron descubiertad en 1520 por la corona española, y gueronintegradas al virreynato del rio de la plata (lo que hoy es argentina y uruguay), los ascentamientos franceses y britanicos que hubo en las islas alla por los 1700s fueron denunciados por españa y francia y reino unido se retiraron.
      las islas tubieron 32 gobernadores en nombre de la corona española hasta 1811, que debido a la revolucion de mayo españa abandono las islas.
      en 1816 las provincias unidas del rio de la plata se declaran independientes, y todo el virreynato del rio de la plata) incluyendo a las malvinas) pasaron a integrar la nueva nacion.
      a partir de 1820 las islas comenzaron a ser pobladas por criollos y varias generaciones fueron naciendo ahi hasta 1833, incluso en 1829 argentina habia designado a un gobernador para las islas.
      pocos años antes de la invasion britanica, el buque uss lexington de usa bombardea las islas ya que argentina les habia prohibido pescar en las islas... esto hizo que uda y reino unido hagan un tratado, usa reconocia la soberania britanica, y reino unido dejaba pescar a usa.
      luego de la invasion, toda la poblacion argentina en malvinas fue asesinada o obligada a abandonar las islas...

  • @zarombiste9158
    @zarombiste9158 35 хвилин тому

    No anti aircraft on this ships?

  • @welshie1979
    @welshie1979 3 місяці тому +4

    Show this to Two Tier Kier

    • @BadEnoch-t7z
      @BadEnoch-t7z Місяць тому

      Starmer and his anti British cabinet can't wait to give Britain away

  • @johndillon5290
    @johndillon5290 10 місяців тому

    I remember during the conflict being told by a Spanish translator that the Argentinians were told if they were captured by the British, they would be eaten. Guess that's one way to keep your men fighting.

  • @brunol-p_g8800
    @brunol-p_g8800 11 місяців тому +6

    5:09 funny, somehow that moral claim wasn’t taken into consideration when British settlers started to arrive to the falklands and took the place of French and Spanish settlers..

    • @qasimmir7117
      @qasimmir7117 11 місяців тому +4

      Well it was the British that discovered the islands and we didn’t take the French or Spanish places. The British and the French settlements were in two different locations and the Spanish weren’t even settled there. They just came along and said ‘this place is ours because the Pope said so’ and forced the British off the islands. Then the Spanish tried to give it to Argentina and that’s when the British came took it back.

    • @brunol-p_g8800
      @brunol-p_g8800 11 місяців тому +1

      @@qasimmir7117
      The island were first claimed to have been discovered by the (con-)man Amerigo Vespucci. The first real and proved trace of the islands is by the Spanish Esteban Gómez (1520), and then Simón de Alcazaba y Sotomayor et Alonso de Camargo (before 1540).
      Only in 1594 did the first Brit discover the islands, Richard Hawkins.
      Then a Dutch, Sebalf Van Weert in 1600.
      In 1690 another Brit names, like they have been many times named by others before, with the name of Falklands islands.
      The first recorded to stop and anchor at the islands is Frenchman Jacques Gouin de Beauchêne in 1700.
      The first settlement on the islands is Port Saint-Louis, by Bougsinville, in 1764. After a few years the colony was sold to and handed over to Spain and the French settlers left and were replaced by Spanish settlers, the name changed to Puerto Soledad and the new Spanish governor took office on April 1st 1767.
      In 1766, British colons illegally disembarked and established themselves in the Port de la Croisade, that they renamed Port Egmont. The. In December the British frigate anchored in Port-Louis facing the French fort. The captain, Mac Bride, went ashore, screamed some threats and then quickly went back aboard his frigate and left.
      Then comes the crisis of the 1770s..
      The Brits are crushed by the Spanish. Cramer capitulates and the Brits return to their country aboard HMS Favourite.
      Then without their French ally, Spain ends up talking with the UK. The Brits are allowed to return to and have back Port Egmont, on the condition of the recognition of the islands being Spanish. They do return.

  • @Snipe4261
    @Snipe4261 5 днів тому

    It's very weak reasoning to suggest that the Falklands should be Argentinian because they're closest to Argentina and a "colonial" possession when humans never inhabited the islands prior to European settlement. Decolonization normally involves returning control of land to it's native inhabitants but the Falklands "native" inhabitants are British descendants with a longstanding relationship with Britain that they don't want to terminate. I think it's disingenuous to not mention that the Argentinian scrappers that landed to dismantle the whaling station had a proper license to do so and the issue was not that they landed there but that they were accompanied by military personnel and an Argentinian flag was raised on British territory.

    • @martinerdozain1623
      @martinerdozain1623 3 дні тому

      You ar missing that 190 years ago there was in fact an argentinian civil settlement with an argentinian gobernor, whom were expelled from the islands…
      Prior to that the te unique civilian population there was many decades prior to that an was a French one, that recognized the sovereingty from spain… that recognize Argentina as the legitímate sovereign its territory including those islands.

  • @jenynce
    @jenynce 9 місяців тому +3

    The thing that I absolutely don’t understand is why did they think they can take Britain. Granted the mainland uk is far and Argentina is really close to Falkland which was massive advantage for Argentina but Britain didn’t have an empire the biggest empire ever 25% of total landmass of earth at one point without knowing how to launch an attack at far away land and surely they knew British military was far more advanced in fact all 3 aspect of military with British navy , British air force and British army was far superior to Argentina’s so they were never going to win. So either they massively misjudged and miscalculated and thought Britain might just not bother or they had supreme confidence in their military but the whole thing was suicidal and they lost a lot of good men for nothing except dented pride a loss of ships , aircrafts , loss of economy , money etc etc

    • @sergioandres7343
      @sergioandres7343 6 місяців тому

      cooperación secreta entre gran bretaña y chile , pistas de aterrizaje y espionaje

    • @jenynce
      @jenynce 5 місяців тому +1

      @@sergioandres7343 once again you don’t get an empire biggest in the world without knowing how to attack

    • @dorakizz5650
      @dorakizz5650 4 місяці тому

      @@jenynce Is the "biggest empire in the world" still with us?

    • @jenynce
      @jenynce 4 місяці тому

      @@dorakizz5650 no it’s not there anymore

    • @atrlawes98
      @atrlawes98 3 дні тому

      @@dorakizz5650The peak of Empire was still in living memory in 1982 and centuries of accumulated expertise didn’t just disappear.

  • @newyorkskier
    @newyorkskier 3 місяці тому

    A good documentary. But the constant going back and forth with the events in the story was extremely annoying. The continuity was broken at many points

  • @Foxtrottangoabc
    @Foxtrottangoabc 11 місяців тому +3

    Only one name , the Falklands

  • @AndreasHagen-q4d
    @AndreasHagen-q4d 11 місяців тому +1

    The Argentines could never win the Falklands war, but I can't say why!!!

  • @Simonj2109
    @Simonj2109 10 місяців тому +3

    England never never never shall be slaves. ❤

    • @DinoAlberini
      @DinoAlberini 10 місяців тому

      For an American, that’s impressive. However, you got it wrong.

    • @philiprice7875
      @philiprice7875 4 місяці тому +1

      just working a zero hour contract for min wage

    • @cattledog901
      @cattledog901 3 місяці тому +1

      Oh the irony lol 😂

  • @peterwhitaker4038
    @peterwhitaker4038 9 місяців тому +1

    amazing how the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (that is the name,) did it without the shameful help from any country in the commenwealth or the European union. we stood alone...again.

    • @TomFynn
      @TomFynn 9 місяців тому

      Not really, the US gave the Brits AIM 9L sidewinders, Stinger missiles, secure sat com and enough air lift to make Wideawake Field busier than Chicago O'Hare. If they also supplied at intel is a matter of conjecture. Also Chile helped by stationing soldiers at the border, pinning the best of the Argentine Army in place just in case. OK, the soldiers were already there, since the Junta had planned originally to take on Chile.

  • @iodescilla1246
    @iodescilla1246 9 місяців тому +4

    F A L K L A N D I S L A N D S F O R E V E R!!!

  • @Hopgoodd
    @Hopgoodd 8 місяців тому +1

    Am I missing something here! There are no Argentinians currently living or have lived on those islands, if we have to go back the 1700's to make a claim, then let's look at the indigenous population back in South America especially Argentina talk about the Spanish imperialist trying land grab ;-) x Nothing changes :-)

  • @peterkilbridge6523
    @peterkilbridge6523 11 місяців тому +3

    I read "The Falklands War" by Martin Middlebrook (Pen & Sword). The war was won by Admiral Woodward, the RAF Hurricane Pilots, the Paras, the Royal Marines, the Scots Guards, and by the Grace of Lady Luck and Almighty God. The war was almost won by the courageous and very professional pilots of the Argentine Air Force. The outcome was a closer call than most people even imagine.

    • @reubenjackson7829
      @reubenjackson7829 11 місяців тому +1

      Hurricanes?? I think you mean FAA Sea harriers and RAF GR3 Harriers

    • @anthonyeaton5153
      @anthonyeaton5153 11 місяців тому +1

      God almighty had nothing to do with the victory in the Falklands. It was great leadership and the sheer blood and guts fighting by the British and Gurkha forces, plus a submarine attack and that bit of luck you mentioned. No Yanks no Aussies to claim they won it, thank goodness

    • @郑颍
      @郑颍 11 місяців тому +1

      @@reubenjackson7829 I think he is right. Didn't you know that the RAF got together a squadron of Hurricanes, with original 100 year old pilots. They also planned to send a squadron of Sopwith Camels with 130 year old pilots.