Having a Subaru is like having a plain-looking wife who is an excellent cook, a great mom, is thoughtful, kind, considerate, great with the budget, and never fails to surprise you in a good way and impress you. That's why a little extra maintenance now and then is never too much to ask.
Well, as a man, we all know there is only one thing we want from women.... How HOT is she? That's why we keep buy those beautiful European money pits. (a Subaru owner says)
Subaru’s isn’t that great either. An open diff and differential braking will never substitute for a limited slip and locking centre differential-or locking front and rear diffs.
Regardless of what type of 4WD/AWD system you have and you get stuck, try this. Slightly put your foot on the break while the tires are spinning. Applying the breaks will transfer torque to the tires not spinning and most likely get you out of your situation. But it does depend how stuck you are in the mud or snow. Depending on which tires are losing traction, you can also apply your hand break too. If your in the snow, lower your tire pressure and that will help a lot too to gain traction. This is an old off road trick to create a manual traction control. I wish I was driving the cars that didn’t make it up that ramp, I would apply the break while giving it gas and drive right up their ramp.
07 Forester XT owner here. They have a really good AWD system. I'd argue one of the best of all car manufacturers. However be aware taking a corner too fast in the dry and sliding on road will transfer power to the outside wheel and you will feel it lurch as the other side slams power to grip the tarmac. Pretty brutal and unexpected, just don't try be an idiot on the road :P
Martisan The opposite of that, I'm saying you will feel it transfer the power to the side with traction, thus you feel it grab the road hard and pull you straight. IE if you try to slide it on purpose, expect it to try counter it and put power to the wheels with grip which will pull you in the direction they are facing.
I have had two Subaru foresters a 2005 and now a 2011. I live in Northeast PA in the Pocono mountains and the Subarus go where most vehicles get stuck.
Got 5in of snow last winter and there were drifts of 8+ inches. Passed a 4x4 Honda Pilot that was stuck in the road with my inferior ground clearance Subaru Legacy. If only their bumpers were built for offroading, Subarus would be up there with Rover and Jeep I think.
Marco "just roasted Honda" yeah sure, imbecile. Hondas aren't made fast from factory, the people who buy them for a legitimate reason know this, every single one of them, they buy it because it's a fun car, and with a nice exhaust, in their opinion, they sound very nice. They're cruisers, touge racers, enjoyment cars, not race cars, but if you wanted to there's not a single Honda out there you couldn't turn into a race car, or atleast a drag car, now am I saying that I like them and that I would like to buy one, no, they're not my style, and I'm more of a I6 kind of guy, like an R32 or a supra, something of the nature, but from my expirience and the people I hang out with daily, and literally hundreds I've met over the years, that's what I've heard, they know they're not going anywhere ridiculously fast, but they're looking damn good doing it, and that's just that, no argument to it. Saying a Honda is beautiful is the EXACT same thing as saying a 2017 ZO6 looks beautiful, opinion, not a fact whatsoever. So much hate for Honda for literally no reason at all.
@@terragaia7092 R.I.P. Mitsubishi. Now that they're effectively gone, Subaru is the only remaining player, however now they have no competition. Hopefully they don't fluff off.
Good lord, the VW isn't failing at the ramp due to transverse engine mounting. It's because it lacks the ability to sufficiently lock any differential to transmit the required torque. Keep making the ramp steeper, and the subie will fail like all the others (or it will overheat its drivetrain). Make it less steep, and the VW and Toyota will do fine. A vehicle with lockable differentials will pass this test at much, much steeper angles. (Modified toyota pickup, land rover, land cruiser etc etc). That's why you buy true 4WD with a "PART TIME" designation. Aka: Can't use it on dry pavement because it grips so well. I will say, Subaru tends to have the best AWD system for mixed use driving. The thing is... you pay for it. It's not as fuel efficient, it needs more maintenance, and it is heavier. But it is probably the best full time AWD solution.
Have had a forester, full time AWD... fuel part is very true. any full time AWD car, alot of parts and especially the massive Subie trans and engine = heavy and will eat fuel, more wheels to feed whereas FWD will just pull the car and has less parts needed to send the power towards the wheels thats why they made massive 4 cylinder FWD vans. But if i am not wrong you can remove a fuse and start the car and the car should start in front wheel drive. not sure about the new models though. So about the forester, 6spd non turbo. took it 500000km no major issues! just serviced it, regular oil stuff, the engine was never taken apart and the gearbox never had issues even the diffs. Only changed belts, batteries, radiator and tyres like any other person. The car eventually died not an engine issue or trans as far as i could see, the car was running perfectly as you start moving but getting the car moving, it would bog down like something was restricting it, maybe electrical issues as you give it gas and it sounded like a refridgerator condensor as if it was the air con because it kept giving the car a super high idle every 10 seconds while at a stop and only at a stop and couldnt turn it off. might have been a driveshaft issue for all i know but its long gone now. Now i have a Gc8, 5spd non turbo, 200000km no issues as well. same as the forester
Oh you can buy An Sti as it has DCCD no need for modifications 50/50 power split and you can lock the centre diff and play around with Traction Control as well which in snow should so wonders
I'd love to see more tests like this including Volvo AWD and other manufacturers, as well as turning on/off options such as X-drive, ESP, differential locks, etc.
It's 2019 now. I'd love to see how Honda's awd compares the Ridgeline/Pilot and CRV compare tot he Outback and Forester. What did 12 years of technology do for non-Subaru vehicles?
😂😂😂😂 Scotty prefers Toyotas. I think he's mainly concerned with reliability. One of his major problems with Subaru is head gasket issues, and I think he'd go with the highlander.
Yeah in one of Scotty's new videos he acknowledged Subaru superior traction control. He needs to understand not every one needs a car to last 300k miles. Some people just need a car to help them not die.
I own a 2001 Subaru outback with the original engine and transmission. Currently at 378,671 miles on it. I did the head gaskets using a 6 star head gasket. Still good. The head gaskets were done at 123,464 k
best test methodology i've seen. i'd like to see this updated or done yearly with many more cars. just put out a sign have your 4X4 tested for winter traction free. outback is the skier's best friend
To everyone talking about Subbys and their bad head gaskets: MAKE SURE that you replace with a *SIX-STAR* brand head gasket kit and you're good to go. Just had head gasket replaced, timing belt, new radiator and hoses, valve seals/covers/guides, etc done on my 06 Subby Outback with 190k on it. Ready to go 300k no problem. If you replace a bad subby head gasket with another OEM head gasket, guess what? It fails again because you're replacing a bad part, with the same bad part. USE 6STAR BRAND HEAD GASKET KIT! If you find a used Subaru that you really like/want but needs a head gasket replaced, tell them take off the cost of repairs from listing price (or as close as you can get, $800-$1,500) then get the much higher quality Six-Star brand gasket kit and it's good to go for the life of the car. Ps. Stick with OEM for timing belt and water pump they are solid parts.
@I'm Still Alive explain more. The only spending you should spend is on regular scheduled maintenance and a head gasket repair **ONLY** if you buy a used subby and it hasn't been done yet, or if you take the price out of the sellers asking price. Because other than the head gasket, my 06 outback 2.5I 4cyl Automatic Limited trim has no problems at all. Replacing a CV axle and fixing small power steering leak are the only things on my to do list for hopefully the next 2 years, that and oil changes and a coolant flush soon. There is a reason you see so many on the road at 200k-320k
While I don't agree with the assertions that the offset transmission/drive axles are the cause of the inabilities shown, I am impressed by Subaru's ability to climb with just one wheel. I know this has much more to do with highly effective proportional braking of individual wheels, than it does with a symmetrical drivetrain.
Correct btw subaru does not recommend doing this as it is really bad for the cv axle having one tire move the car witch is why unlike vw they don't advertise this feature
Yea i highly doubt it has anything to do with that, is more of the issue with open differentials and not having a proper torque vectoring system onboard. Older subarus would probably have similar issues unless they have limited slip differentials. As for cars that didnt climb....they have just fake "AWD" sustems that cant be depended on that much they might toggle on during a slide but that's about it then they will instantly turn off its just 0 offroad/bad conditions capability. Older 4Runner would do much better but newer ones are as fake as most of these "AWD" systems in transverse engine cars.
@@Kacpa2 While not AWD, the Mazda Miatas I've owned over the years, all had Torsen differentials. Unlike typical limited slip differentials that rely on friction disks, Torsen has a very clever combination of spur and worm gears, to deliver power to the non-slipping wheel. Completely mechanical without any computer or controller to function. I wonder how that would work on a Subaru for both axles?
@@ElementofKindness Just look at the subaru STI system. they have torsen (or torsen like) system front and rear with an adjustable torque distribution center diff
@@pascha4527 Oh, that's cool! I love the Torsen differential in Mazda Miatas. I'd run out of steering before I'd run out of traction when driving them in deep snow. 😅
Subaru used direct competitors against each other. The Tribeca was able to do this as well. In newer videos, the Forester with the base engine and Subaru's most basic AWD was also able to climb on one wheel. It's not a matter of weight, it's a matter of being able to put power where needed. The Passat's Haldex system is inferior to Subaru's most basic system.
4motion can be haldex, torsen or viscous. It depends on vehicle year and model. I assure you I did the research before I got my Subie and yes, Subaru has at least 3 different AWD systems. The new STi now uses Torsen differentials on both front and rear with a driver-selectable traction bias center differential. Just Google for Subaru viscous coupling and you'll find the information. Just like the 4motion, it depends what year, model, etc.
Great video, the thing is that the other brands all use haldex systems. And subaru har their own system on 4wd, subaru, bmw and audi has the best 4wd systems and they use their own systems. Except that audi a3/s3 had haldex
Great video with a really clever test bed. I am not a fanboy type at all, but I do own a 2004 manual Forester, which I bought used a couple of years ago. I could not be happier with it.
Pickup up a 2018 Forester MT6 base model from my folks, who moved up to automatics. I pulled our 1200 pound teardrop trailer, with dog, 2 babies, wife, and camp gear, at highway speeds for two days, and got 26mpg. Daily driving to work, it's getting 31.4 indicated on the display (more like 29.5 at the pump), it's smooth, quite (well, road noise), and the windows are like a greenhouse. I see all. Couldn't be happier!
Mercedes advertised the ML to be able to do this, when it first came out. Since then, many companies advertises they can do a one wheel ramp climb. Audi, back in the early 80's, had manual diff locks on the 4000 Quattro and semi auto on the 5000 Quattro. You could lock the center and rear differentials, giving you a positive 3 wheels driven, which is what got them up Pikes peak faster than any other. That, and big turbos. Eventually, they were outlawed altogether, because nobody could beat them, even after many custom restrictions were imposed against them, to make them less competitive. AMC mass produced cars (Eagles) with part/full time 4WD, that made them more capable than most pickup trucks! As far as the Passat failing this test, it has to be a software issue. VW synchro AWD is just as capable as Audi's Quattro, as it is the same company and they share the technology anyway.
The issue, though, is that a lot of the lower-end models like the Q3 use the older Haldex AWD systems that only operate when they sense a problem. So you have to check carefully that you are really getting actual 100% of the time on Quattro versus the part-time version, since they all say "Quattro" on them for marketing purposes.
Carefree6714 I bought a new 2018 Golf Sportwagen 4Motion S in July and have been anxiously waiting the first snowfall. Finally a couple of days ago we got pretty hammered here in the Northeast. After about 5 inches of unplowed snow was on the ground, I took her out to navigate our back country roads here in the hill country of Litchfield County, Connecticut. I was like a 16 year old kid driving his first car. I couldn’t believe how she ate up the steep inclines- without snow tires, just the original equipment tires. Granted, this is my first AWD car in my 40 years of driving, so perhaps I’m easily impressed. However I don’t think so- I think this is a superiority balanced vehicle and I’m not kidding- not a hesitation, not a fishtail, not a sideways slide- she was true straight ahead on all inclines. These cars are absolutely awesome. I traded in my 14 year old Volvo V40 FWD which I loved- hard to see her go- for this car. I looked at Volvo and just couldn’t stomach their new $50K+ price range. This car’s sticker price was $26K and change- the base model Sportwagen- and I got it online for $5200 off sticker. I couldn’t beleive it. The quality and performance feels like a $50K car. How long will it last? Only time will tell. But the styling blows away its Subaru counterparts and I think performance is superior too. I hope to see a lot more on the road!
this should be a promo video definitely should be worked into a commercial. I have tested Subaru's AWD system to the max one of the only cars I never got winter tires for. Could run with Summer tires and still dump the clutch and take off on a icy road gotta love the Subaru.
The engine in the passat wasn't just turned 90 degrees, it got a new AWD system too. The previous generation passat 4motion uses the same underpinnings as the Audi A4 Quattro. Torsen, not haldex.
I'm on my third subaru, and the sawd system has never gotten me stuck. Also, they're perfect for drifting (as long as the engine can handle it (rip subaru #2))
only got stuck once in my 08 forester, i framed it in snow. yeah don't try to drive in a parking lot that's not plowed lol. took about of foot of snow to frame it
I moved from the Chicago area to a small town in South Dakota and traded in my '02 Impala LS for an '05 Baja Turbo, given how much more snow SD gets and how much colder the temps are (they only use sand because salt is ineffective). It seems to snow 4 - 8 inches every weekend since November, and every weekend I take my Baja out for a joy ride before the plows get to work. It's so nice to have a car I can get into after some big snow without worry !
They keep stopping in order to pretend Subaru's AWD system is so great, its not, and they were starting and stopping the slip rollers with the computer system in order to make it look as though Subaru had no problems.
Had this same scenario, I was on at a light on the top of a hill that was icy in a FWD Audi and I could not move forward even with good snow tires, needed some people to help push me. Sold the car and got an Audi quattro, never looked back as the same situation happened again but this time I pulled up with ease.
I have a 2009 Honda CR-V and it works just fine in ice, snow, and mud. I will agree the 4wd system sucks but I live in Seattle so it works just fine here with it's weather. I got it for reliability. And don't forget this is also a Subaru ad so they try to point out all the reasons why Subarus are better.
A simple button press in the Highlander would have got it up the ramp...there's a 4WD lock button which locks it into a 50/50 torque split up to 25mph and would have had no trouble making it up the ramp. Does the Honda have anything like that? All these vehicles are FWD biased, they do not have the ability in normal settings to transfer enough power to get the vehicle moving...I think you should try the Highlander again except engage the 4WD lock mode wonder if the results would be different?
1st gen Highlanders have a 50/50 split at all times, it has a snow mode that’s basically a transmission setting which starts it in second gear to reduce wheel spin from a stop
The STI is Torsen in the rear, planetary gear in the middle, and a helical diff in the front. The DCCD also allows the driver to manually change the torque split between the front and rear wheels.
I think most of these systems would serve the average person in average winter weather just fine, but it’s nice to know that in a worst case scenario, you’d be okay. I will say that I recently rented a Buick Enclave to go up to Snowshoe WV. We were hit by a decent snowstorm up there and they don’t much clear the roads, strangely you can deactivate the AWD manually, which I discovered the previous renter had done, but once activated (and it stays on even when the car is turned off and back on) I literally did not slip once, even in deep snow and on steep hills.
It's a pretty good video, and comparison. It would be nice if you could do it on some never cars and models as well, like Subaru, Volvo, Audi, BMW and other competitors.
This is why my wife has an Outback and I have a Forester. Our AWD Toyota’s always had to have studded tires and every winter. Even when our Subaru’s had the factory tires on them, we still had no issues with traction even in our winter months when we get 5-7 feet of snow. Now that our factory tires had to be replaced, we replaced them with Michelin Cross Climate 2. They’re Awesome on dry, wet, and snowy conditions. They’re a quiet tire and they don’t lower our mpg. When they wear out, we’ll replace them with new Cross Climate tires. After switching from Toyota AWD vehicles and replacing them with Subaru’s, our insurance premiums DROPPED by $600 per year. This is due to the traction, accident avoidance and safety of our Subie’s. Both our Outback and our Forester Touring are 2019 year models. When our Subie’s wear out, we’ll be replacing them with another Subaru.
@yngvaigilbsteen That is correct. For Subaru, VDC is integrated with the AWD. It's not slapped on top of it. Some manufacturers, like Volvo, have systems that are not fully integrated. A Volvo has to disengage AWD to engage ABS. Subaru uses steering, braking, accelerator, and individual wheel sensors to ensure that the vehicle is going in the direction where the steering wheel is pointed. It can do this by braking on individual wheels and managing engine output.
I loved this video. I own 2 pre owned Subarus and the 2007 3.6 Passat, second best. I would like to have seen this test also done on a level surface. I'm thinking the VW would've been able to move with that one tire and maybe it's a more realistic, daily encounter.
@robMD2010 This was done with traction control on and off for the audience. The video was filmed with it on, as it was thought to be the best way to demonstrate they way the systems fully integrate with their AWD and traction control systems. Traction control on and off didn't make a difference as the vehicles weren't "stuck." Subaru has the same instructions in the owners manual about vehicles being stuck. It is a condition where none of the wheels have traction.
@Solumic Not a BS test. The video was a recap for people that were actually there and could see the entire vehicles. It was never meant for public consumption. Anyone with any knowledge of mechanics and AWD can tell you that the system in the CR-V is inferior to many of the AWD systems offered by other companies, not just Subaru's.
Nissan's AWD systems are good aswell but kind of rare and far inbetween on most models. But ones that have it and have some performance or capability often work really well. Tho in cheaper and more pseudo SUV crossover cars like Juke it definetly is another of these fake nonfunctional AWD systems
I know this video is old, but jfc this data is cherry picked. First tests with the Forester involved the front and rear wheels, but the moment it came to the vw (a comparable car) they changed the test to feature only one of the front wheels... Then instead of making the comparison to a car that has similar power (the Forester) they switched to a car with roughly 50-100 more horsepower and a lighter frame for the one wheel test, by using the legacy gt.
You need to qualify that statement. All you need is one tire to move a vehicle. The traction is going to be based on that one tire... what compound? What tread? What tire pressure? Are there studs or chains? Traction is everything. I’ll take a 37 HP D2 Caterpillar and out pull a 1 ton diesel pickup truck on mud. So really, it’s the tires. And who’s going to driving around on crappy all seasons because they own the “best” AWD car in the world? Subaru drivers! That’s why I pass so many of them spun out in the ditch with my 2WD shit box with tires worth more than the whole vehicle is. Overconfidence in Motion.
Nothing beats Subaru AWD. I had a Legacy years ago that I loved. I drove it around 4WDs stuck in the ditch all the time. But, while many folks here talk about being on their third or forth Subaru I am still driving my first Honda. My wonderful Legacy lasted six years, blew a head gasket and, though I sank a couple thousand into it, they never could fix it to where it wouldn't overheat going up hill. My 99 CRV is still going strong, 398,000 miles, and all I've ever done to it (other than maintenance) is change out the ignition switch cause my key got stuck. Currently I am seeing recall after recall on Subarus. So, while I would rather have a Subaru, I guess I'll just call in sick when the snow is really bad and enjoy my Honda reliability. Most of the time, in most conditions, it does fine; but it's no Subaru.
@SparkDischarge You should check out an exploded view of the automatic transmission. It is located EXACTLYon the centerline. Subaru's VDC system reacts quicker than a LSD. In addition to that, it can run every parameter of controlling the power split through the ECU. The downside is for track use, it will contribute to brake fade. VDC allows all new Subarus to do what all none STI vehicles couldn't do, control left and right power split on the front wheels.
Guys torque steer does not dictate power to the wheels. It is only a by product of out dated hardware. The differentials control where the power guys. Open difs will always send all the power to wheel with the least amount of traction. Unless redirected electrically or mechanically. The last subaru had a special dif in the rear that will send equal power to both wheels
My first Subaru was a 2009 Outback 2.5. I now drive a 2015 3.6 Outback, and am in love with Subaru! While the VW did OK, it's so goofy looking, LOL! Anyway, I'll always own a Subaru!
I own a Subaru and I also know that part of the explanation here is a BS. A Forester climbs at 2:10 because with an auto gearbox it is almost a front wheel drive until clutch in gearbox clamps stronger and links front to rear. Just like 4motion, but in VW clutch is located in rear diff and is 100% open when not needed. It climbs with zero rear wheel slippage at 2:40 because it is back in FWD mode. No sensing of loss of traction, it just does not lose it because rear cannot spin faster than front. It would not pass a one front wheel traction test because of an open front diff, and either pass after a few seconds of spinning or fail with one rear wheel traction depending if it is equpped with rear diff with limited slip or not. Legacy has a same design with a clutch between front and rear, but is equipped with a clever traction control that can use brakes to stop a free-spinning wheel, a workaround when no locking differentials are provided. With a manual gearbox Forester would act slightly different - It would have a front-rear LSD differential so with rear on ice it would first slip for a second or two and then LSD clamps it would pull itself on front wheels.
@lostnumbr ofcourse it does. On a wet street, there is some traction. One wheel may have more traction than the other. If both wheels are on a surface with no traction. The shorter shaft will always slip. What you are experiencing in your 99 impreza is totally different than what's happening in this situation. You can start a fire with dry sticks rubbed together, a lighter, lightening, or a magnifying glass. We are talking about torque steer created by a lighter and not by a magnifying glass.
@SoDaSub actually a quick youtube search yields several videos of CR-V's either stuck or not able to plow through snow. You can even see the front wheels turn and the rears not turning on CR-V's that are supposedly 4WD.
Not a mythbusters quality test unfortunately. We can't even see what is happening with the rear wheels when these cars start to climb. Could be tied down haha
@chlarock The people this video was meant for were actually there and could see the entire vehicle. It was meant as a recap for the attendees.There's an independently conducted version in my other videos
Bit late but.. it's the drivetrains that differ. The tested Forester was Auto, the Legacy was manual; that's the difference. The autos have a different rear diff setup to the manuals (electronic control, rather than a limited slip mechanical diff); an auto Legacy also would not climb this, a manual Forester would.
There are 3 different awd systems from subaru currently the cvt,standard manual,and sti manual there the same in all cars and suvs in the lineup except us regulations now states all vehicles must have electronic traction systems so if you get stuck in a newer subaru you absolutely have to turn that system off
nearly all of these AWD comparison videos are rigged in favor of the brand they are trying to promote. sadly i would say just from personal experience 99% of people think they know how AWD works, but really don't fully understand it. then you get brand wars started and spread ignorance as a result. so this is how it works. there are mechanical viscous coupling units, mechanical torsen differentials and electronic coupling units. electronic units require sensor input before it reacts. viscous coupling units use gear oil in a clutch pack differential much like a clutch pack limited slip differential, just no ring and pinion gears. so when the wheels up front slip, they lock the driveshaft to the transmission and rotate all the wheels at the same speed. electronic units are FWD until locked together by a solenoid in the transmission but still allows for slip with clutch packs. torsen differentials use gears rotating in opposite directions that bind up to lock the output shaft to the driveshaft. every video compares vehicles with the same or similar AWD systems. the only difference is they turn off traction control and ESP in the vehicle they are trying to promote and leave it on in the others that are competition. traction control cuts fuel to the engine obviously resulting in a power loss and less rotation at the wheels. ESP applies brakes to the wheels that are slipping to stabilize the vehicle. if the front wheels slip and can't rotate fast enough to cause lock, the coupling unit or torsen can never lock. notice in every video demonstrating this they start to move forward on the rollers and then traction control kicks and they start rocking back and forth. even though each vehicle would climb the ramp and rollers if traction control was off, these videos use these tricks to sway your opinion in favor of the brand they are promoting. the Audi Quattro system is the best AWD system you can buy for the money, and it would still fail to climb the ramp if the traction control is on. don't believe everything you see on the internet.
Wesley Ash you tried to sound cool and act like you know something. But watch the fucking video. The Subaru proves to be best. What more do you need? Fucking idiot making excuses.
I have a Subaru SVX (vtd) 1994 since 1995, here in Paraguay. Is an absolutely solid car with a high level construcion and still in a really good shape.
Has nothing to do with longitudinal or transverse powertrain, has little to do with LSDs as most of the vehicles are not equipped with them. Where they are, it us usually a viscous LSD which requires wheelspin to lockup, notice the Legacy displays very little wheelspin. In most of these examples it is down to the effectiveness of the traction control system. I don't know why the Honda etc would not transmit enough torque to the rear, a Haldex unit should be capable of providing huge lock-up - certainly the one on my Nissan Panthfinder does. The best case scenario would be three limited slip diffs and junk off the traction control with a plate rear with aggressive ramp angles and high preload, a DCCD centre with semi-active controller and a plate front with light preload will give you the best traction and best efficiency for laying down the power. The 'Symmetrical AWD' is the stupidest strap line Subaru have come up with, the powertrain layout is good for weight distribution and serviceability (i.e. you can get the transmission out quicker), nothing else.
Any 4X4 truck with a locking diff would pass any of the one wheel tests. Powertrain layout is more for marketing than anything else I hate working on those pieces of crap spark plugs are way more annoying than they need to be luckily the head gaskets like to blow the exact same time the spark plugs need to be changed so that's nice. So you could do them both at the same time.
@@HimmelWeint I don't think the Ford track lok will do crap if one wheel has zero traction. The S-Spring gives about 20ft/lbs of locking power. Maybe a bit of movement on a level ground. Then you need a bit of traction on the other tire.
The Highlander has a button you can press to send more power to the rear wheels. If they're want intentional bias in the video, they would have enabled it.
@tos3rd Yes... as long as the VDC is turned on. The VDC acts like an LSD and brakes on the slipping wheel. This forces power to the side that has traction. VDC monitors wheel spin for each wheel and can brake on them individually.
Torque steer isnt caused by unequal length axle shafts. It it caused by the difference of angle of the shafts. If you have the right side flat and left up/down, it will pull towards the right and vise versa.
@robMD2010 That scenario specifically is applied to all 4 wheels being stuck. Subaru has similar instructions in its manual. This is a case of 2 wheels having traction and two wheels not. The vehicle isn't "stuck." It's just not able to transfer power to the wheels with traction.
@tomnwoo The left to right movement is torque steer. The traction control isn't swapping power left and right, it's reigning in the torque steer that is more visible because the wheels are "on ice." The Subaru Legacy doesn't do this because the drivetrain is symmetrical and the drive shafts axle shafts are of equal length. I have a video of an independently done test which shows other vehicles doing the same thing.
@MrMadmax900 You are obviously mad at Subaru for your shaking steering wheel and are doing your best to post negative things and are prepared to lie to further your cause.
@patbasanese It's called torque steer. The VW has a transversely mounted engine and transmission. As the traction and stability control turns on and off, it causes the wheels and thus the steering wheel to jerk to one side. This is more pronounced on the rollers due to the reduced traction on 3 wheels. The driver is reigning it in to stay on the platform.
The VW's computer sensed it was doing a test and therefore it worked.
:DDDD
touche! very funny comment.
4 motion💪🏽💪🏽
Rofl
#4WDgate
Having a Subaru is like having a plain-looking wife who is an excellent cook, a great mom, is thoughtful, kind, considerate, great with the budget, and never fails to surprise you in a good way and impress you. That's why a little extra maintenance now and then is never too much to ask.
Love. It’s what makes a Subaru a Subaru
For that she has to be allowed to show some violent drinking habits...
And the blowjobs.
Well, as a man, we all know there is only one thing we want from women.... How HOT is she?
That's why we keep buy those beautiful European money pits. (a Subaru owner says)
So you claim Subaru is plain-looking? Okay maybe it is, but thats part of it's greatness!
You know it’s a good awd system when you can’t tell if it’s a Subaru commercial or if it’s just that good
It’s what makes a Subaru, a Subaru *outro music
@@thebigcheese1889 999k
I am mawra
It's not the first video showing Honda's fake AWD system.
Jakub Kurzawa it's not a fake awd , it's just not the best, unless sh awd is the beast.
Subaru’s isn’t that great either. An open diff and differential braking will never substitute for a limited slip and locking centre differential-or locking front and rear diffs.
Jakub Kurzawa
My crv awd works great, mud snow ice, no problem
James Mcginn
Well no, that's unlikely a result of AWD. Front wheel drive vehicles already excel at snow.
I love 4 wheel drive
Regardless of what type of 4WD/AWD system you have and you get stuck, try this. Slightly put your foot on the break while the tires are spinning. Applying the breaks will transfer torque to the tires not spinning and most likely get you out of your situation. But it does depend how stuck you are in the mud or snow. Depending on which tires are losing traction, you can also apply your hand break too. If your in the snow, lower your tire pressure and that will help a lot too to gain traction. This is an old off road trick to create a manual traction control. I wish I was driving the cars that didn’t make it up that ramp, I would apply the break while giving it gas and drive right up their ramp.
This video made me buy a secondhand Subaru. Maybe it's just a Subaru's marketing trick, but it's really convincing.
07 Forester XT owner here. They have a really good AWD system. I'd argue one of the best of all car manufacturers. However be aware taking a corner too fast in the dry and sliding on road will transfer power to the outside wheel and you will feel it lurch as the other side slams power to grip the tarmac. Pretty brutal and unexpected, just don't try be an idiot on the road :P
I don't fully understand what you mean by this, are you saying the system makes the slide WORSE in the dry?
Martisan The opposite of that, I'm saying you will feel it transfer the power to the side with traction, thus you feel it grab the road hard and pull you straight. IE if you try to slide it on purpose, expect it to try counter it and put power to the wheels with grip which will pull you in the direction they are facing.
thanks for clarifying!
but are all of them besides subaru with the traction control off? don't think other cars cant climb
VTEC awd did not kick in
LOL! "Underrated" comment.
Slap a VTEC sticker on - fix that issue real quick.
It’s 2 am why am I watching this
same...
5 am for me
Because subie life.
Mdma and weed that's why
2:01 am here, had to know the results
I have had two Subaru foresters a 2005 and now a 2011. I live in Northeast PA in the Pocono mountains and the Subarus go where most vehicles get stuck.
I have a subie here in PA and love this thing.
How are the moutain curves there? may have to bring out my BRZ lol
As if... lol. I’d like to see it go through what my F-150 does with its whopping 7 inches of ground clearance.
Got 5in of snow last winter and there were drifts of 8+ inches. Passed a 4x4 Honda Pilot that was stuck in the road with my inferior ground clearance Subaru Legacy. If only their bumpers were built for offroading, Subarus would be up there with Rover and Jeep I think.
including pickup 4x4?
i wish companies would stop calling their 4wd awd hybrids 4wd
Yup, it ain't 4WD unless there's a transfer case.
Ben Mcghie yeah 3 diffs don't mean 4wd lol
Ben Mcghie 4x4 has a transfer case. 4wd/awd dousnt.
garry eluveitie doesn't 4wd imply 4x4
Exactly
U guys just roasted Honda 😂
it does not need roasting, anyone who knows cars knows that the CRV has the worst AWD of them all.
Marco "just roasted Honda" yeah sure, imbecile. Hondas aren't made fast from factory, the people who buy them for a legitimate reason know this, every single one of them, they buy it because it's a fun car, and with a nice exhaust, in their opinion, they sound very nice. They're cruisers, touge racers, enjoyment cars, not race cars, but if you wanted to there's not a single Honda out there you couldn't turn into a race car, or atleast a drag car, now am I saying that I like them and that I would like to buy one, no, they're not my style, and I'm more of a I6 kind of guy, like an R32 or a supra, something of the nature, but from my expirience and the people I hang out with daily, and literally hundreds I've met over the years, that's what I've heard, they know they're not going anywhere ridiculously fast, but they're looking damn good doing it, and that's just that, no argument to it. Saying a Honda is beautiful is the EXACT same thing as saying a 2017 ZO6 looks beautiful, opinion, not a fact whatsoever. So much hate for Honda for literally no reason at all.
Marco hello
Marco hondas rt awd is garbage we all know that. But Acura's SH-AWD is the shit
Scott Gonzalez gotten out of more off-road situations and ice/snow in a Honda Pilot than my friends in some AWD cars
Subaru was making rally cars since the 80's and pretty much perfected traction control since then.
Ahmad Faris sorry to interrupt you but in rally the use a permanent AWD system and a diff that is basically almost like a welded diff
Don't forget the notorious active-yaw 4wd from Mitsubishi. Tommi Makinen doesn't settle for less.
@@terragaia7092 R.I.P. Mitsubishi. Now that they're effectively gone, Subaru is the only remaining player, however now they have no competition. Hopefully they don't fluff off.
as did Audi with Quattro and why they won so many rally/WRC race back in the day
I’m watching this in 2019 and wondering why they are testing cars from 10+ years ago. Then I looked at the publishing date. Makes sense now.
Is this issue still the same with current models?
I'm 10 I was born when this video was made XD
As soon as they said Tribeca I knew how fucking old this was. I work at a Subaru dealership and we try to pretend those were never made.
i hope subaru stay in business for a long ass time
I hope so too, but I can’t imagine what their vehicles will look like in 20 years time
Good lord, the VW isn't failing at the ramp due to transverse engine mounting. It's because it lacks the ability to sufficiently lock any differential to transmit the required torque. Keep making the ramp steeper, and the subie will fail like all the others (or it will overheat its drivetrain). Make it less steep, and the VW and Toyota will do fine.
A vehicle with lockable differentials will pass this test at much, much steeper angles. (Modified toyota pickup, land rover, land cruiser etc etc). That's why you buy true 4WD with a "PART TIME" designation. Aka: Can't use it on dry pavement because it grips so well.
I will say, Subaru tends to have the best AWD system for mixed use driving. The thing is... you pay for it. It's not as fuel efficient, it needs more maintenance, and it is heavier. But it is probably the best full time AWD solution.
Have had a forester, full time AWD... fuel part is very true. any full time AWD car, alot of parts and especially the massive Subie trans and engine = heavy and will eat fuel, more wheels to feed whereas FWD will just pull the car and has less parts needed to send the power towards the wheels thats why they made massive 4 cylinder FWD vans. But if i am not wrong you can remove a fuse and start the car and the car should start in front wheel drive. not sure about the new models though.
So about the forester, 6spd non turbo. took it 500000km no major issues! just serviced it, regular oil stuff, the engine was never taken apart and the gearbox never had issues even the diffs.
Only changed belts, batteries, radiator and tyres like any other person.
The car eventually died not an engine issue or trans as far as i could see, the car was running perfectly as you start moving but getting the car moving, it would bog down like something was restricting it, maybe electrical issues as you give it gas and it sounded like a refridgerator condensor as if it was the air con because it kept giving the car a super high idle every 10 seconds while at a stop and only at a stop and couldnt turn it off. might have been a driveshaft issue for all i know but its long gone now.
Now i have a Gc8, 5spd non turbo, 200000km no issues as well. same as the forester
Oh you can buy An Sti as it has DCCD no need for modifications
50/50 power split and you can lock the centre diff and play around with Traction Control as well which in snow should so wonders
THAVANI it might have just been a clogged or burned up catalytic converter or a timing sensor issue, possibly something relatively minor.. poor Subie!
2018 WRX weighs 200-500 pounds less than an Audi A4. So idk where you get “it weighs more”. Hell it weighs 1000lbs less than an S5.
@@FallenFriendly I hope it does. The WRX is a half rally car. The S5 is for fast driving on the Autobahn.
I'd love to see more tests like this including Volvo AWD and other manufacturers, as well as turning on/off options such as X-drive, ESP, differential locks, etc.
I would like to see how the manual versions stack up. My Legacy GT is meant to have 50/50 torque split but has LSDs front and rear
It's 2019 now. I'd love to see how Honda's awd compares the Ridgeline/Pilot and CRV compare tot he Outback and Forester. What did 12 years of technology do for non-Subaru vehicles?
ua-cam.com/video/7f1Uz8SqnzI/v-deo.html
This video is biased towards subaru. They were paid to fake this
@@brandonar868 lmfao how?
I can confirm that even my Acura SH-AWD system is worse than my Subaru 4EAT. Lmfao.
still the best. I guess you never drove one..
it would be nice if we could see the rear wheels too...
the last test was rear or do you mean from the VW?
SKOTTY KILMER HAS LEFT THE CHAT!
😂😂😂😂
Scotty prefers Toyotas.
I think he's mainly concerned with reliability. One of his major problems with Subaru is head gasket issues, and I think he'd go with the highlander.
Yeah in one of Scotty's new videos he acknowledged Subaru superior traction control. He needs to understand not every one needs a car to last 300k miles. Some people just need a car to help them not die.
I own a 2001 Subaru outback with the original engine and transmission. Currently at 378,671 miles on it. I did the head gaskets using a 6 star head gasket. Still good. The head gaskets were done at 123,464 k
He has mentioned in some of his videos that Subaru make the best AWD system
@@jeffreyschindler2289 I'm gonna need to do the head gasket on my 2000 legacy wagon with 130k miles on the odometer
I've seen several videos like this in the past few months. I went out and bought a used Forester and I love it.
Good choice
best test methodology i've seen. i'd like to see this updated or done yearly with many more cars. just put out a sign have your 4X4 tested for winter traction free.
outback is the skier's best friend
To everyone talking about Subbys and their bad head gaskets:
MAKE SURE that you replace with a *SIX-STAR* brand head gasket kit and you're good to go. Just had head gasket replaced, timing belt, new radiator and hoses, valve seals/covers/guides, etc done on my 06 Subby Outback with 190k on it. Ready to go 300k no problem. If you replace a bad subby head gasket with another OEM head gasket, guess what? It fails again because you're replacing a bad part, with the same bad part. USE 6STAR BRAND HEAD GASKET KIT! If you find a used Subaru that you really like/want but needs a head gasket replaced, tell them take off the cost of repairs from listing price (or as close as you can get, $800-$1,500) then get the much higher quality Six-Star brand gasket kit and it's good to go for the life of the car.
Ps. Stick with OEM for timing belt and water pump they are solid parts.
Thanks for the tip! Planning to buy my first car second-hand, and looking at a Subaru.
@I'm Still Alive explain more. The only spending you should spend is on regular scheduled maintenance and a head gasket repair **ONLY** if you buy a used subby and it hasn't been done yet, or if you take the price out of the sellers asking price. Because other than the head gasket, my 06 outback 2.5I 4cyl Automatic Limited trim has no problems at all. Replacing a CV axle and fixing small power steering leak are the only things on my to do list for hopefully the next 2 years, that and oil changes and a coolant flush soon. There is a reason you see so many on the road at 200k-320k
8:26 Subaru doesn't claim that, but lets validate that claim.
While I don't agree with the assertions that the offset transmission/drive axles are the cause of the inabilities shown, I am impressed by Subaru's ability to climb with just one wheel.
I know this has much more to do with highly effective proportional braking of individual wheels, than it does with a symmetrical drivetrain.
Correct btw subaru does not recommend doing this as it is really bad for the cv axle having one tire move the car witch is why unlike vw they don't advertise this feature
Yea i highly doubt it has anything to do with that, is more of the issue with open differentials and not having a proper torque vectoring system onboard. Older subarus would probably have similar issues unless they have limited slip differentials. As for cars that didnt climb....they have just fake "AWD" sustems that cant be depended on that much they might toggle on during a slide but that's about it then they will instantly turn off its just 0 offroad/bad conditions capability. Older 4Runner would do much better but newer ones are as fake as most of these "AWD" systems in transverse engine cars.
@@Kacpa2 While not AWD, the Mazda Miatas I've owned over the years, all had Torsen differentials. Unlike typical limited slip differentials that rely on friction disks, Torsen has a very clever combination of spur and worm gears, to deliver power to the non-slipping wheel. Completely mechanical without any computer or controller to function. I wonder how that would work on a Subaru for both axles?
@@ElementofKindness Just look at the subaru STI system. they have torsen (or torsen like) system front and rear with an adjustable torque distribution center diff
@@pascha4527 Oh, that's cool! I love the Torsen differential in Mazda Miatas. I'd run out of steering before I'd run out of traction when driving them in deep snow. 😅
Now let's see those guys with "My X-Drive is better".
Subaru used direct competitors against each other. The Tribeca was able to do this as well. In newer videos, the Forester with the base engine and Subaru's most basic AWD was also able to climb on one wheel. It's not a matter of weight, it's a matter of being able to put power where needed. The Passat's Haldex system is inferior to Subaru's most basic system.
4motion can be haldex, torsen or viscous. It depends on vehicle year and model. I assure you I did the research before I got my Subie and yes, Subaru has at least 3 different AWD systems. The new STi now uses Torsen differentials on both front and rear with a driver-selectable traction bias center differential. Just Google for Subaru viscous coupling and you'll find the information. Just like the 4motion, it depends what year, model, etc.
I watched this when it was still a fresh vid, bought an outback because of this video. Absolutely loved that car.
Great video, the thing is that the other brands all use haldex systems. And subaru har their own system on 4wd, subaru, bmw and audi has the best 4wd systems and they use their own systems. Except that audi a3/s3 had haldex
Ridiculous how these companies charge extra for ineffective AWD. Great video. Very detailed.
"This is a full-time four-wheel-drive system."
No it's not.
Great video with a really clever test bed. I am not a fanboy type at all, but I do own a 2004 manual Forester, which I bought used a couple of years ago. I could not be happier with it.
Pickup up a 2018 Forester MT6 base model from my folks, who moved up to automatics. I pulled our 1200 pound teardrop trailer, with dog, 2 babies, wife, and camp gear, at highway speeds for two days, and got 26mpg. Daily driving to work, it's getting 31.4 indicated on the display (more like 29.5 at the pump), it's smooth, quite (well, road noise), and the windows are like a greenhouse. I see all. Couldn't be happier!
I feel like this was one big advert for Subaru.
it pretty much is. those stringed flags separating the seats from the car area have the Subaru logo on them. still its a good demonstration
Very useful! Love to see Rav4 being compared with similar cross-overs and older generations of these versus newer ones.
Mercedes advertised the ML to be able to do this, when it first came out. Since then, many companies advertises they can do a one wheel ramp climb. Audi, back in the early 80's, had manual diff locks on the 4000 Quattro and semi auto on the 5000 Quattro. You could lock the center and rear differentials, giving you a positive 3 wheels driven, which is what got them up Pikes peak faster than any other. That, and big turbos. Eventually, they were outlawed altogether, because nobody could beat them, even after many custom restrictions were imposed against them, to make them less competitive. AMC mass produced cars (Eagles) with part/full time 4WD, that made them more capable than most pickup trucks! As far as the Passat failing this test, it has to be a software issue. VW synchro AWD is just as capable as Audi's Quattro, as it is the same company and they share the technology anyway.
The issue, though, is that a lot of the lower-end models like the Q3 use the older Haldex AWD systems that only operate when they sense a problem. So you have to check carefully that you are really getting actual 100% of the time on Quattro versus the part-time version, since they all say "Quattro" on them for marketing purposes.
This is why I want one! Perfect for the winter!
i can't hear the engine cause ur voice is too loud
Carefree6714
I bought a new 2018 Golf Sportwagen 4Motion S in July and have been anxiously waiting the first snowfall. Finally a couple of days ago we got pretty hammered here in the Northeast. After about 5 inches of unplowed snow was on the ground, I took her out to navigate our back country roads here in the hill country of Litchfield County, Connecticut. I was like a 16 year old kid driving his first car. I couldn’t believe how she ate up the steep inclines- without snow tires, just the original equipment tires. Granted, this is my first AWD car in my 40 years of driving, so perhaps I’m easily impressed. However I don’t think so- I think this is a superiority balanced vehicle and I’m not kidding- not a hesitation, not a fishtail, not a sideways slide- she was true straight ahead on all inclines. These cars are absolutely awesome. I traded in my 14 year old Volvo V40 FWD which I loved- hard to see her go- for this car. I looked at Volvo and just couldn’t stomach their new $50K+ price range. This car’s sticker price was $26K and change- the base model Sportwagen- and I got it online for $5200 off sticker. I couldn’t beleive it. The quality and performance feels like a $50K car. How long will it last? Only time will tell. But the styling blows away its Subaru counterparts and I think performance is superior too. I hope to see a lot more on the road!
this should be a promo video definitely should be worked into a commercial. I have tested Subaru's AWD system to the max one of the only cars I never got winter tires for. Could run with Summer tires and still dump the clutch and take off on a icy road gotta love the Subaru.
The engine in the passat wasn't just turned 90 degrees, it got a new AWD system too. The previous generation passat 4motion uses the same underpinnings as the Audi A4 Quattro. Torsen, not haldex.
I'm on my third subaru, and the sawd system has never gotten me stuck. Also, they're perfect for drifting (as long as the engine can handle it (rip subaru #2))
I just totaled my legacy while drifting today. It was ridiculously fun to say the least
Oof
only got stuck once in my 08 forester, i framed it in snow. yeah don't try to drive in a parking lot that's not plowed lol. took about of foot of snow to frame it
I moved from the Chicago area to a small town in South Dakota and traded in my '02 Impala LS for an '05 Baja Turbo, given how much more snow SD gets and how much colder the temps are (they only use sand because salt is ineffective). It seems to snow 4 - 8 inches every weekend since November, and every weekend I take my Baja out for a joy ride before the plows get to work. It's so nice to have a car I can get into after some big snow without worry !
0:56 I dunno, this looked like it was gonna go up if the driver was a little more keen on allowing it to.
They keep stopping in order to pretend Subaru's AWD system is so great, its not, and they were starting and stopping the slip rollers with the computer system in order to make it look as though Subaru had no problems.
Great! Symmetrical is the key word to look for. That's what I want next! Thanks!
That was a long Subaru commercial.
Had this same scenario, I was on at a light on the top of a hill that was icy in a FWD Audi and I could not move forward even with good snow tires, needed some people to help push me. Sold the car and got an Audi quattro, never looked back as the same situation happened again but this time I pulled up with ease.
STEVE MOYER'S SUBARU(READING ,PA) THE BEST! I WANT A 6-CYLINDER(LOADED) LEGACY 2021 MODEL SO GET READY!
I have a 2009 Honda CR-V and it works just fine in ice, snow, and mud. I will agree the 4wd system sucks but I live in Seattle so it works just fine here with it's weather. I got it for reliability. And don't forget this is also a Subaru ad so they try to point out all the reasons why Subarus are better.
A simple button press in the Highlander would have got it up the ramp...there's a 4WD lock button which locks it into a 50/50 torque split up to 25mph and would have had no trouble making it up the ramp. Does the Honda have anything like that?
All these vehicles are FWD biased, they do not have the ability in normal settings to transfer enough power to get the vehicle moving...I think you should try the Highlander again except engage the 4WD lock mode wonder if the results would be different?
1st gen Highlanders have a 50/50 split at all times, it has a snow mode that’s basically a transmission setting which starts it in second gear to reduce wheel spin from a stop
The STI is Torsen in the rear, planetary gear in the middle, and a helical diff in the front. The DCCD also allows the driver to manually change the torque split between the front and rear wheels.
owner of a STI.... Best car I have ever owned in my life.Great video, it proves that you get what you pay for.
I think most of these systems would serve the average person in average winter weather just fine, but it’s nice to know that in a worst case scenario, you’d be okay. I will say that I recently rented a Buick Enclave to go up to Snowshoe WV. We were hit by a decent snowstorm up there and they don’t much clear the roads, strangely you can deactivate the AWD manually, which I discovered the previous renter had done, but once activated (and it stays on even when the car is turned off and back on) I literally did not slip once, even in deep snow and on steep hills.
It's a pretty good video, and comparison.
It would be nice if you could do it on some never cars and models as well, like Subaru, Volvo, Audi, BMW and other competitors.
Arpad-Jozsef Halmagyi did you not see two Subarus this n the video? Are you blind?
Arpad-Jozsef Halmagyi
Indeed I would love to see some German cars put to shame
ua-cam.com/video/xwPYTimG37M/v-deo.html :p
beernutsonline
That didn't help
On the old Top Gear, the boys showed a BMW X5 unable to climb a damp grassy slope. Range Rover did it with no trouble. Same tires on both.
This is why my wife has an Outback and I have a Forester.
Our AWD Toyota’s always had to have studded tires and every winter.
Even when our Subaru’s had the factory tires on them, we still had no issues with traction even in our winter months when we get 5-7 feet of snow.
Now that our factory tires had to be replaced, we replaced them with Michelin Cross Climate 2. They’re Awesome on dry, wet, and snowy conditions. They’re a quiet tire and they don’t lower our mpg. When they wear out, we’ll replace them with new Cross Climate tires.
After switching from Toyota AWD vehicles and replacing them with Subaru’s, our insurance premiums DROPPED by $600 per year. This is due to the traction, accident avoidance and safety of our Subie’s.
Both our Outback and our Forester Touring are 2019 year models.
When our Subie’s wear out, we’ll be replacing them with another Subaru.
Was the crv at full throttle?
Mine only engages with more gas. Which isn't ideal but how it works.
@yngvaigilbsteen That is correct. For Subaru, VDC is integrated with the AWD. It's not slapped on top of it. Some manufacturers, like Volvo, have systems that are not fully integrated. A Volvo has to disengage AWD to engage ABS. Subaru uses steering, braking, accelerator, and individual wheel sensors to ensure that the vehicle is going in the direction where the steering wheel is pointed. It can do this by braking on individual wheels and managing engine output.
I loved this video. I own 2 pre owned Subarus and the 2007 3.6 Passat, second best. I would like to have seen this test also done on a level surface. I'm thinking the VW would've been able to move with that one tire and maybe it's a more realistic, daily encounter.
My 2001 Dodge Dakota 2wd quad cab with mud tires and 600 pounds in the pickup bed would go just about anywhere.
Own 2 Subie. They are great. Live in state where it never snows. The traction and overall vehicle control is phenomenal.
This is biased because they didn't activate the VTM-4 button to make it all the time all wheel drive! Which is only activated in first gear.
@robMD2010 This was done with traction control on and off for the audience. The video was filmed with it on, as it was thought to be the best way to demonstrate they way the systems fully integrate with their AWD and traction control systems. Traction control on and off didn't make a difference as the vehicles weren't "stuck." Subaru has the same instructions in the owners manual about vehicles being stuck. It is a condition where none of the wheels have traction.
should have used an 80's audi quattro with optional locking diff.
This video was to compair most suvs that most common familys buy, when you dont have to fork out 40,000 for decency..
@Solumic Not a BS test. The video was a recap for people that were actually there and could see the entire vehicles. It was never meant for public consumption. Anyone with any knowledge of mechanics and AWD can tell you that the system in the CR-V is inferior to many of the AWD systems offered by other companies, not just Subaru's.
My Infiniti G35X has AWD package and it works just as good as my buddy's 2002 Subaru Impreza!
Nissan's AWD systems are good aswell but kind of rare and far inbetween on most models. But ones that have it and have some performance or capability often work really well. Tho in cheaper and more pseudo SUV crossover cars like Juke it definetly is another of these fake nonfunctional AWD systems
I know this video is old, but jfc this data is cherry picked.
First tests with the Forester involved the front and rear wheels, but the moment it came to the vw (a comparable car) they changed the test to feature only one of the front wheels... Then instead of making the comparison to a car that has similar power (the Forester) they switched to a car with roughly 50-100 more horsepower and a lighter frame for the one wheel test, by using the legacy gt.
volkswagen claims one wheel with traction can move the car..maybe they are talking about on flat ground and not an incline
Yeah that's what I was thinking
You need to qualify that statement. All you need is one tire to move a vehicle. The traction is going to be based on that one tire... what compound? What tread? What tire pressure? Are there studs or chains?
Traction is everything. I’ll take a 37 HP D2 Caterpillar and out pull a 1 ton diesel pickup truck on mud.
So really, it’s the tires. And who’s going to driving around on crappy all seasons because they own the “best” AWD car in the world? Subaru drivers!
That’s why I pass so many of them spun out in the ditch with my 2WD shit box with tires worth more than the whole vehicle is. Overconfidence in Motion.
Nothing beats Subaru AWD. I had a Legacy years ago that I loved. I drove it around 4WDs stuck in the ditch all the time. But, while many folks here talk about being on their third or forth Subaru I am still driving my first Honda. My wonderful Legacy lasted six years, blew a head gasket and, though I sank a couple thousand into it, they never could fix it to where it wouldn't overheat going up hill. My 99 CRV is still going strong, 398,000 miles, and all I've ever done to it (other than maintenance) is change out the ignition switch cause my key got stuck. Currently I am seeing recall after recall on Subarus. So, while I would rather have a Subaru, I guess I'll just call in sick when the snow is really bad and enjoy my Honda reliability. Most of the time, in most conditions, it does fine; but it's no Subaru.
Have fun with your Subaru's CTS transmission
CVT* and they aren't that bad, just have to drive one eventually
I feel this is a pro Subaru video. I’ll do it with my wrangler. Very cool video tho.
I have a subaru and i believe that subaru’s awd is amazing, but this camera angle just makes me think that someone was pushing the subi. 😄
@SparkDischarge You should check out an exploded view of the automatic transmission. It is located EXACTLYon the centerline. Subaru's VDC system reacts quicker than a LSD. In addition to that, it can run every parameter of controlling the power split through the ECU. The downside is for track use, it will contribute to brake fade. VDC allows all new Subarus to do what all none STI vehicles couldn't do, control left and right power split on the front wheels.
I’m glad I purchased 2001 outback llbean in 2019
I just got an '03 Bean a couple months ago as well!
Guys torque steer does not dictate power to the wheels. It is only a by product of out dated hardware. The differentials control where the power guys. Open difs will always send all the power to wheel with the least amount of traction. Unless redirected electrically or mechanically. The last subaru had a special dif in the rear that will send equal power to both wheels
My first Subaru was a 2009 Outback 2.5. I now drive a 2015 3.6 Outback, and am in love with Subaru!
While the VW did OK, it's so goofy looking, LOL!
Anyway, I'll always own a Subaru!
I love my 07 Forester and after watching this I’m going out to buy another one
I own a Subaru and I also know that part of the explanation here is a BS. A Forester climbs at 2:10 because with an auto gearbox it is almost a front wheel drive until clutch in gearbox clamps stronger and links front to rear. Just like 4motion, but in VW clutch is located in rear diff and is 100% open when not needed. It climbs with zero rear wheel slippage at 2:40 because it is back in FWD mode. No sensing of loss of traction, it just does not lose it because rear cannot spin faster than front. It would not pass a one front wheel traction test because of an open front diff, and either pass after a few seconds of spinning or fail with one rear wheel traction depending if it is equpped with rear diff with limited slip or not. Legacy has a same design with a clutch between front and rear, but is equipped with a clever traction control that can use brakes to stop a free-spinning wheel, a workaround when no locking differentials are provided.
With a manual gearbox Forester would act slightly different - It would have a front-rear LSD differential so with rear on ice it would first slip for a second or two and then LSD clamps it would pull itself on front wheels.
@lostnumbr ofcourse it does. On a wet street, there is some traction. One wheel may have more traction than the other. If both wheels are on a surface with no traction. The shorter shaft will always slip. What you are experiencing in your 99 impreza is totally different than what's happening in this situation. You can start a fire with dry sticks rubbed together, a lighter, lightening, or a magnifying glass. We are talking about torque steer created by a lighter and not by a magnifying glass.
Another Subaru advertisement 👀
This is my first winter with a Subaru and honestly it blew my mind, the Subaru goes right through snow like its not even there.
Which suburu?
why we can't see the rear tires?
Do you not see the wall there ? Dumbass
KYDuramax502 because its fake as fuck, unfair, and filmed in a subaru facility
Paper Chaser omg that’s not what he means...... You’re the dumbass smh
Rear wheels don't have steal beams !
What's there to see?
@SoDaSub actually a quick youtube search yields several videos of CR-V's either stuck or not able to plow through snow. You can even see the front wheels turn and the rears not turning on CR-V's that are supposedly 4WD.
I own a crv and live in Minnesota i can confirm this
Not a mythbusters quality test unfortunately. We can't even see what is happening with the rear wheels when these cars start to climb. Could be tied down haha
Exactly, it looks like they could have filmed the entire car if they would have shot it from the other side, inexcusable.
vfosterm you’re an idiot. Go drive these cars yourself. You’ll see that most “AWD” systems are garbage. Subaru is the best. It’s simple
Ok simple, theres more than one channel that do the same tests with rear wheels showing.
for all the idiots crying about the rear wheels. Subaru wins, again. ua-cam.com/video/RCuvwYd9JuE/v-deo.html
Nah you just never owned a subaru
@chlarock The people this video was meant for were actually there and could see the entire vehicle. It was meant as a recap for the attendees.There's an independently conducted version in my other videos
So, legacy is better than forester?
It was back then. They are all about the same now.
Bit late but.. it's the drivetrains that differ. The tested Forester was Auto, the Legacy was manual; that's the difference. The autos have a different rear diff setup to the manuals (electronic control, rather than a limited slip mechanical diff); an auto Legacy also would not climb this, a manual Forester would.
There are 3 different awd systems from subaru currently the cvt,standard manual,and sti manual there the same in all cars and suvs in the lineup except us regulations now states all vehicles must have electronic traction systems so if you get stuck in a newer subaru you absolutely have to turn that system off
This video is revealing, I would've never second guessed a 4wd system.
nearly all of these AWD comparison videos are rigged in favor of the brand they are trying to promote. sadly i would say just from personal experience 99% of people think they know how AWD works, but really don't fully understand it. then you get brand wars started and spread ignorance as a result. so this is how it works. there are mechanical viscous coupling units, mechanical torsen differentials and electronic coupling units. electronic units require sensor input before it reacts. viscous coupling units use gear oil in a clutch pack differential much like a clutch pack limited slip differential, just no ring and pinion gears. so when the wheels up front slip, they lock the driveshaft to the transmission and rotate all the wheels at the same speed. electronic units are FWD until locked together by a solenoid in the transmission but still allows for slip with clutch packs. torsen differentials use gears rotating in opposite directions that bind up to lock the output shaft to the driveshaft. every video compares vehicles with the same or similar AWD systems. the only difference is they turn off traction control and ESP in the vehicle they are trying to promote and leave it on in the others that are competition. traction control cuts fuel to the engine obviously resulting in a power loss and less rotation at the wheels. ESP applies brakes to the wheels that are slipping to stabilize the vehicle. if the front wheels slip and can't rotate fast enough to cause lock, the coupling unit or torsen can never lock. notice in every video demonstrating this they start to move forward on the rollers and then traction control kicks and they start rocking back and forth. even though each vehicle would climb the ramp and rollers if traction control was off, these videos use these tricks to sway your opinion in favor of the brand they are promoting. the Audi Quattro system is the best AWD system you can buy for the money, and it would still fail to climb the ramp if the traction control is on. don't believe everything you see on the internet.
Wesley Ash one of the best comments out there
the truth is simple
Wesley Ash would toyota climb if traction control was off?
Wesley Ash you tried to sound cool and act like you know something. But watch the fucking video. The Subaru proves to be best. What more do you need? Fucking idiot making excuses.
Ray45929 lol. Fucking idiots. Go drive all these cars and you’ll realize they’re all garbage except the Subaru.
I have a Subaru SVX (vtd) 1994 since 1995, here in Paraguay. Is an absolutely solid car with a high level construcion and still in a really good shape.
Has nothing to do with longitudinal or transverse powertrain, has little to do with LSDs as most of the vehicles are not equipped with them. Where they are, it us usually a viscous LSD which requires wheelspin to lockup, notice the Legacy displays very little wheelspin. In most of these examples it is down to the effectiveness of the traction control system. I don't know why the Honda etc would not transmit enough torque to the rear, a Haldex unit should be capable of providing huge lock-up - certainly the one on my Nissan Panthfinder does. The best case scenario would be three limited slip diffs and junk off the traction control with a plate rear with aggressive ramp angles and high preload, a DCCD centre with semi-active controller and a plate front with light preload will give you the best traction and best efficiency for laying down the power. The 'Symmetrical AWD' is the stupidest strap line Subaru have come up with, the powertrain layout is good for weight distribution and serviceability (i.e. you can get the transmission out quicker), nothing else.
Finally a sane comment from someone who understands that this symmetrical AWD is marketing bullshit. Nothing to do with torque distribution.
Any 4X4 truck with a locking diff would pass any of the one wheel tests. Powertrain layout is more for marketing than anything else I hate working on those pieces of crap spark plugs are way more annoying than they need to be luckily the head gaskets like to blow the exact same time the spark plugs need to be changed so that's nice. So you could do them both at the same time.
@@HimmelWeint I don't think the Ford track lok will do crap if one wheel has zero traction. The S-Spring gives about 20ft/lbs of locking power. Maybe a bit of movement on a level ground. Then you need a bit of traction on the other tire.
The Highlander has a button you can press to send more power to the rear wheels. If they're want intentional bias in the video, they would have enabled it.
I love subbies but you can't compare 4wd to a true awd system of course it's going to fail in comparison
@tos3rd Yes... as long as the VDC is turned on. The VDC acts like an LSD and brakes on the slipping wheel. This forces power to the side that has traction. VDC monitors wheel spin for each wheel and can brake on them individually.
Mitsubishi is the real competitor of Subaru.
Sean Zhong no....
Sean Zhong Suzuki?
True it will challenge Subaru
Well it was maybe not now
Sean Zhong
Naaaaah AUDI is the real competitor
Torque steer isnt caused by unequal length axle shafts. It it caused by the difference of angle of the shafts. If you have the right side flat and left up/down, it will pull towards the right and vise versa.
subaru is the best car in the world
Dilithium Crystals I want one.
only their marketing and CVT ideas sucks!!
Until is breaks down
No its not
TheSteelGamer lol. How many Subarus have you owned?
@robMD2010 That scenario specifically is applied to all 4 wheels being stuck. Subaru has similar instructions in its manual. This is a case of 2 wheels having traction and two wheels not. The vehicle isn't "stuck." It's just not able to transfer power to the wheels with traction.
Subaru are the best quality/price ratio cars on the market, plain and simple"
@tomnwoo The left to right movement is torque steer. The traction control isn't swapping power left and right, it's reigning in the torque steer that is more visible because the wheels are "on ice." The Subaru Legacy doesn't do this because the drivetrain is symmetrical and the drive shafts axle shafts are of equal length. I have a video of an independently done test which shows other vehicles doing the same thing.
@MrMadmax900
You are obviously mad at Subaru for your shaking steering wheel and are doing your best to post negative things and are prepared to lie to further your cause.
@patbasanese It's called torque steer. The VW has a transversely mounted engine and transmission. As the traction and stability control turns on and off, it causes the wheels and thus the steering wheel to jerk to one side. This is more pronounced on the rollers due to the reduced traction on 3 wheels. The driver is reigning it in to stay on the platform.
4:53
You're not fooling me.
That engine doesn't sound like 'petal to the metal'.
That's the entire point they're trying to make.
Did you mean "peDal tothe metal"?
This is an AWD CR-V. The CR-V was unable to shift power to the rear from a standing start. It needed to be in motion to initiate a power shift.