Really nice video. Glad to see the innovative use of glass balustrade and the glass platforms instead of metal/plastic elements seen in many parts of India.
Thank you for your valuable response, all the information mentioned is collected from various websites. Some of the Hindu sculptures (deities) and Sanskrit or Punjabi inscriptions are visible as well.
That's what happens when you don't know about history. Devas/Daevas and Asura/Ahura both are mentioned in Vedic Hindu and Avestan/Zoroastrians scriptures. If you are a Parsi, you would have known that deities like Mitra/Mithra is worshiped both by the Hindus and Parsis. Parsis have rejected the deity Indra whereas Hindus still worships him. Yajna/Yasna ritual is performed by both Hindus and Parsis. So both of them worships the fire (Agni/Atash). You should read some older Sanskrit and Avestan scriptures, else you will never know the similarities. The word 'Baku' is derived from Atshi-Baguan (Fires of Baguan). Baguan is derived from the word 'Baga' which means God in Old Persian and 'Bhaga' which also means God in Sanskrit.
There is much incorrect information. I was there two days ago, and the entrance attracted me due to the Sanskrit script. I was a student of Sanskrit until the 10th grade. The name of King Vikramaditya was mentioned on the second line of the stone after "(ॐ गणेशाय नमः)," which dates back hundreds of years earlier than the 18th century, as you mentioned. The nearest Vikramaditya of the 18th century was Samarth Hemu, who fought with Akbar and died in battle. The government has presented the history of this Ateshgah in the complex. I read the information very carefully, especially the timeline. Let me give you the bullet points: 1) The fire is expected to have been burning for the last 4,000 years. 2) The first worship of this fire started in the 2nd century by Zoroastrians, almost 2,000 years ago. 3) Hindu merchants started visiting in the 13th century during their travels on the Silk Route, almost 900 years ago. It is still confusing to attribute the name of King Vikramaditya to this site, as all Vikramadityas are much older than the mentioned construction date of 1802 Samvat.
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Really nice video. Glad to see the innovative use of glass balustrade and the glass platforms instead of metal/plastic elements seen in many parts of India.
Dr. Vinay Sahasrabuddhe has confirmed this is a shakti peeth and a Hindu temple.
❤❤❤
Our lost province we bring you back to somewhere you belong🇮🇷😭
thats a hindu temple. not persian. cry about it lil persian 😂
indian merchants = punjabi khatris/ sindhis
Sorry this is Baku Zoroastrian temple and has nothing to do with Hinduism
Thank you for your valuable response, all the information mentioned is collected from various websites.
Some of the Hindu sculptures (deities) and Sanskrit or Punjabi inscriptions are visible as well.
That's what happens when you don't know about history.
Devas/Daevas and Asura/Ahura both are mentioned in Vedic Hindu and Avestan/Zoroastrians scriptures. If you are a Parsi, you would have known that deities like Mitra/Mithra is worshiped both by the Hindus and Parsis.
Parsis have rejected the deity Indra whereas Hindus still worships him.
Yajna/Yasna ritual is performed by both Hindus and Parsis. So both of them worships the fire (Agni/Atash).
You should read some older Sanskrit and Avestan scriptures, else you will never know the similarities.
The word 'Baku' is derived from Atshi-Baguan (Fires of Baguan). Baguan is derived from the word 'Baga' which means God in Old Persian and 'Bhaga' which also means God in Sanskrit.
@@darkoptimisticvery true.
There is much incorrect information.
I was there two days ago, and the entrance attracted me due to the Sanskrit script. I was a student of Sanskrit until the 10th grade. The name of King Vikramaditya was mentioned on the second line of the stone after "(ॐ गणेशाय नमः)," which dates back hundreds of years earlier than the 18th century, as you mentioned.
The nearest Vikramaditya of the 18th century was Samarth Hemu, who fought with Akbar and died in battle.
The government has presented the history of this Ateshgah in the complex. I read the information very carefully, especially the timeline. Let me give you the bullet points:
1) The fire is expected to have been burning for the last 4,000 years.
2) The first worship of this fire started in the 2nd century by Zoroastrians, almost 2,000 years ago.
3) Hindu merchants started visiting in the 13th century during their travels on the Silk Route, almost 900 years ago.
It is still confusing to attribute the name of King Vikramaditya to this site, as all Vikramadityas are much older than the mentioned construction date of 1802 Samvat.
@@noorfaruque493 wow, I visited there. But I never noticed vikramaditiya there. I studied Sanskrit too
Rich of scammers